Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:24):
Welcome to Cryptic Chronicles, a show all about everything unexplained, mysterious,
and weird in the world today. In the show, we're
going to go over the first bit in a two
parter about the possibility that humans are actually not from
Earth at all, and that we didn't evolve here, but
we're put here or stranded here hundreds of thousands of
(00:45):
years ago. The majority of information I'm using comes from
the book Humans Are Not From Earth by Doctor Ellis Silver,
and links to resources will be in the details of
this episode. If you come from a grounded scientific point
of view, this may be a pretty weird pill to
swallow that just doesn't go down the tube, right. But
(01:06):
let's just set our preconceived notions aside and engage with
this information as a thought experiment with no need to
accept it or deny it. The ideas are fascinating regardless
of our inclinations, so myself, I'm just going to go
with it as a narrative without trying to debunk anything
or say what's true or not true or anything like that.
(01:29):
I'm just going to go at the flow and enjoy
the ride. Doctor Ellis Silver is a legitimate scientist, ecologist,
and environmentalist who holds a doctorate in the monology, so
pretty smart guy. Throughout his career, he's a massed and
mountain of research that he considers legitimate evidence that humans
didn't evolve on Earth. And this is in no way
(01:51):
our home planet or resembles where we came from. And
this idea instantly creates so many questions. If we are
not from Earth, how did we get here? Were we
put here? Are we stranded here somehow? And just what
is this so called evidence that suggests we didn't evolve
on this planet? Hm, let's hop into it, shall we.
(02:15):
I'm your host, Tim Hacker, and you are listening to
cryptic chronicles.
Speaker 2 (02:29):
This is this is the way, this is the way.
Speaker 3 (02:33):
You're lucks that seat see these, these entities they would
conquer with.
Speaker 1 (02:46):
M Ellis Silver PhD has accumulated a massive compilation of
(03:28):
evidence that is beyond mind boggling and paradigm shifting. But
there are so many others who have tackled this subject
as well, such as Lee Carroll, my favorite, Graham Hancock,
Phil Kurno, Susan B. Morgan, Zachariah Sitchen, and many many more.
Some have called this pantheon of researchers, unreliable, hacks or crackpots.
(03:55):
But honestly, this is going to happen to anyone who
goes outside the mainstream establishment dogma. And if you know history,
it is only people like this who go outside mainstream
establishment dogma that bring revelation and advancement to the human
global civilization. Throughout all of our history, these people have
(04:17):
been oppressed and demonized, Yet when looked back upon through
history's lens, you know, as time progresses, they looked at
as mavericks and brilliant. So at truth, such propaganda against
a researcher is actually a badge of honor. Elie Silver
begins presenting evidence in the book humans are not from
(04:39):
Earth with one of the most basic things that scientists
say give us life on this planet the sun. First off,
if humans evolved on Earth, we're missing one of the
most important things to actually thrive on this planet, a
working nicetating membrane. The fact that we don't have have
(05:00):
this and live on this planet as apex predators is
quite bizarre. You might have noticed that, unlike us, animals
don't ever have to shield their eyes from the sun. We,
on the other hand, get stupefied if the sun shines
directly into our eyes, and it actually damages them, even
causing blindness if done excessively. But animals don't have this issue,
(05:25):
and that's because of their siscitating membrane. However, humans do
have non functioning remnants of this plant in our eyes,
though it just doesn't work as if, according to natural selection,
we didn't need them anymore hundreds of thousands of millions
of years ago. But this obviously isn't the case. We
very much do still need this membrane. I mean, if
(05:48):
we actually wanted to live on Earth effectively because of
our sun. This membrane has even more positive effects for
animals because it's a natural shield for all kinds of
other possible day how much the eyes could take in nature.
According to natural selection, our eyes should have these membranes
if we evolved on Earth. It actually suggests that we
(06:10):
are from a planet where evolution decided we didn't need
them anymore. But on Earth, I mean, look around us,
we still very much do need them. How many people
a year die from driving in their cars and being
stupefied by sun shining in their eyes. The statistic is
actually pretty high. I happen to not write down in
my notes, but in the book does examples, and it's
(06:32):
like a lot of people died because of sun shining
in their eyes. And you gotta wonder, why is this
the thing? You know, maybe Homo sapien sapiens are secretly
from inside the earth. Maybe we're from some kind of
underground cave civilization where we never saw the sun. That's
a plausible theory. But for some reason, we're missing this
seemingly essential gland that I mean, if we're hunters, we
(06:55):
probably could have really used that don't spears, it animals
and stuff with the sunshine in our eyes. And a
good counter to this is that, like other people like
you can argument against this saying that other advanced primates
on Earth are also missing this membrane. But that's not
necessarily a good argument because it's not the same situation,
and it's not the same thing at all, because those
(07:17):
primates that have lost this gland exclusively live in the shade.
That's why, you know, one of the possible reasons people
say that humans don't have them is because we loved
think caves or underground. These primates that have lost this gland,
they exist solely in trees and shade and whatnot permanently.
They don't never go out in the sun, so that
(07:39):
it never had a need for it in their environment. However, humans,
as I'm sure you know, have always spent an insane
amount of our existence under the sun.
Speaker 4 (07:52):
We are natural explorers.
Speaker 1 (07:54):
We have this urge to travel.
Speaker 4 (07:57):
It's an instinct.
Speaker 1 (07:58):
We are natural explorer and always have moved about constantly
under the sky, which is just an objective and arguable
fact about our species. Concerning historical evidence, it makes no sense.
We don't have the membrane. Even Neanderthals had natural biological
protection from the sun for their eyes. If you come
(08:18):
from the view that humans are hybrids with aliens, like
such as Zacharai Sitchen and his work on the Annachy,
the aliens that spliced us together didn't take into account
in humanity's main attribute. We're wanderers and we have to
wander under the glory of a potent sun for our
biology to the point it is damaging and debilitating. Our
(08:40):
eyes are not adapted for potent forms of light, and
that includes artificial light. I mean, other than a couple
primates who exclusively evolved in heavily shaded trees. All other
animals on the planet have natural biological functions to protect
them from the sun, but humans don't. Ellis suggests in
(09:02):
the book that this is because we currently find ourselves
in an alien environment when compared to natural selection of
our ancient past. Africans in particular suffer from this, with
four hundred thousand becoming blinded yearly from cataracts caused by
the sun, and the continent has actually the largest population
of blind people in the world, which I did not
(09:24):
know unt i read this book. In fact, fifty percent
of the world's blindness is from cataracts caused by the sun.
And despite what some people believe as a myth, darker
eye color does not protect against cataracts. Bizarrely, encounterintuitively, blue
eyes actually offer more protection, but it still damages them.
(09:46):
And the reason why blue eyes do this is unexplainable.
But sea rise they do it in a way because
of you know, like snow. The reflection of the sun
on snow just kind of evolved them to maybe filter
out ultraviolet rays better. But it's not anything solid, it's
not something that's explainable, but yeah, it's theorized that they
(10:07):
just block more ultraviolet light than darker eyes, which makes
one wonder why it took them so long to evolve
through natural selection, because actually blue eyes are not that old.
At one point all humans have brown eyes, roughly around
ten thousand years ago, give or take. According to current science,
everyone with blue eyes evolved from a single ancestor around
(10:28):
seven thousand years ago, with this ancestor just having a
genetic mutation in Northern Europe or Scandinavia. Las Silver offers
a lot more evidence about how our eyes don't add
up to living on this planet, and also debunks to
a lot of common arguments against the idea with scientific facts,
(10:49):
such as the argument that lots of people spend most
of their lives inside, But that doesn't work because people
in the tropics have the same issues in comparison to
people who are homebodies first world countries, and those people
spend their whole lives outside basically, And then there are
the whole topic of our skin. Shades of darker skin
(11:13):
do give better protection, but everyone is vulnerable no matter
how dark they are, which is backed up by objectively
factual statistics in the book. People still try to argue
even in modern times like, I'm sure if you put
this online somewhere someone would instantly be like, no, people
with dark skin are immune to sunburns and.
Speaker 4 (11:33):
Excessive UV radiation.
Speaker 1 (11:36):
It's a pretty ingrained myth in modern times. However, the
truth is every single human being on Earth is vulnerable
to excessive UV radiation that can lead to death. So
it doesn't matter where you live, or how long you
spend outside during your life, or how dark your skin is.
Everyone is damaged by the sun. When thinking about natural selection,
(11:59):
you have to I think in many of thousands of
years or millions of years, even not a century of
the modern world having it easy, that's not long enough
to even put a dent.
Speaker 4 (12:10):
In evolution or natural selection.
Speaker 1 (12:13):
Ultraviolet light is a huge deal on Earth and we've
never adapted correctly to deal with it. People try to
argue that black people don't get skin cancer, but this
is easily debunked through facts. Black people actually get skin
cancer too, and tragically, statistically, black people die from it
(12:34):
more often because it's harder to spot on dark skin,
so by the time they get treatment for it, it's
too late. Now they do have better protection from the sun, absolutely,
but they're still vulnerable to it, and it kills them
just like anyone else through excessive exposure. Now the kicker
(12:56):
here is every other species on Earth does not have
this problem. There are exceptions, such as nocturnal creatures or
cave species or fish because they're underwater, But every other
(13:18):
species on the planet that walks under the sun like
us are not damaged by the sun like we are.
According to ellis and science. I guess technically we should
have heavy fur or even scales of some sort if
we truly evolved on Earth, especially since we are wanderers
and explorers naturally as our basic primal instinct. How long
(13:45):
were we hunter gatherers? I bet we did a lot
of that hunter and gathering under the sun, And in
order to hunt and gather you got to move around.
All this means massive exposure to the sun. We would
actually be evolutionary better at all that if we had
protection from the sun. But we don't, which spits in
(14:06):
the eyes of natural selection. The caustic influence the sun
has over our bodies suggests that this is not our
natural environments. Another odd evolutionary aspect of humans is that
despite the sun killing us and objectively being harmful, to
our bodies. We crave the sun. Humans naturally seek out
(14:33):
spending time in the sun, and it's a natural way
we suck up es central vitamins through our skin. Why
would we be evolutionarily programmed to seek something out that
harms our survival. This natural instinct to seek the sun
ingrained in humans suggests that our real home environment didn't
have much direct sunlight wherever it is that we are
(14:54):
truly from the whole. Vitamin D research is fascinating, but
it basically boils down to the fact that our bodies
don't efficiently produce vitamin D from the sun. Fifty percent
of Americans are vitamin D deficient as an example, and
it's even harder to produce the darker the skin gets. However,
this inefficiency can and is augmented by diet. In fact,
(15:19):
many researchers have concluded that if you have the right diet,
sunscreen isn't even necessary. No matter what the shade of
one's skin is, still the most efficient way to get
vitamin D is light, which is bizarre because the source
of our vitamin D kills us and ages us faster.
(15:41):
The conclusion is our biology does not quite sync up
with our sun through the scientific natural selection lens. The
theory that corrects this anomaly is that humans came from
a planet with lower levels of UV radiation and less
direct sunlight. But it also suggests that wherever we did
come from had far more stationary seasons or no seasons
(16:06):
at all. Oh, just a quick side note, there are
animals in modern times that do have skin issues when
exposed to the sun, and the animals that modern times
have issues from this extended exposure to the sun is
actually because of man made breeding and not natural. Also,
(16:28):
animals like elephants who have skin and not fur or
scales have super duper thick skin and also live near
water holes where they regularly cover themselves in mud to
keep cool. So those little side examples of exceptions. Now
(16:55):
we're moving on to fur and our unsuitable biology. We
come to the question about why humans don't have fur
to protect us from the sun. This is relatively up
in the air, and there is still a lot that
is unexplained, such as humans and their pubic hair, which
isn't found on any other mammal or even primates. Our
(17:18):
hair on our head is for UV protection but also
for the wicking effect of sweat, our armpit hair, and
genital hair emit pheromones, so everything seems like it.
Speaker 4 (17:29):
Has a purpose for the most part.
Speaker 1 (17:32):
Oh, genital hair is also for cushion and warmth, like
the hair on our heads, But where's the rest of
our hair. The theory is that we needed better cooling
because of our growing brains, but this doesn't necessarily add
up because there are animals who sweat and still have
fur with for having the wick effect that actually increases
the cooling of the skin. You have to remember the
(17:54):
whole vitamin D thing I mentioned concerning our skin as well,
So maybe we lost start fur to better absorb vitamin D,
but that doesn't make sense because it would hinder our survival.
So maybe natural selection was just being bipolar that day
or something. Our lack of fur can also be theorized
(18:18):
by our real homeworld having consistent warm temperature with never
any extreme or quickly changing in degrees. Not super hot,
mind you, just warm. Our skin would be perfect for
an environment like that, with also a lack of direct
sunlight as well as lower UV radiation levels. If we
came from a world like that, it makes perfect sense
(18:40):
our skin would be how it is it would make
perfect sense we are how we are if we evolved
in that type of environment. Another interesting fact is that
there is no archaeological evidence of clothes older than thirty
thousand years ago. All those images of cave men in
(19:02):
animal skins is not accurate. Some scientists believe that Neanderthals
went extinct because they never learned how to use clothes and.
Speaker 4 (19:10):
The ice age was just too brutal.
Speaker 1 (19:14):
Speaking of ice, human bodies are also not very good
at dealing with the seasons of Earth compared to all
the other species on the planet, but I'll get it
more into that later. In any case, based on all this,
we could put together a picture of what our hypothetical
home world might look like when compared to our biology.
(19:36):
For one, our planet would not tilt on its axis,
or if it did, it would only be a tiny bit,
which means that there are no seasons or very stable seasons.
The planet's orbit would be close to circular around the star.
The star may be larger than our sun on Earth
because the planet is shrouded in some way, probably by
(19:58):
never ending clouds of some sort that still allow light
through but makes the planet eternally shaded. The amount of
light is the same, but the damage caused by UV
radiation is lessened to nonexistent, which would be perfect for
our skin, eyes, and vitamin D intake. If the planet
(20:21):
is not shrouded in clouds or some other gas, then
the star that our hypothetical homeworld would orbit must be
a different type of sun, such as a red or
brown dwarf star. These emit softer light and UV radiation,
so it would be make more sense with our evolutionary biology.
(20:43):
The planet could also have a different sized star but
be further away than the Earth is from the Sun.
All these add up to the evolution of our human
biology and also just cooked note on that whole skin
and staring animals are a lot faster than humans.
Speaker 4 (21:03):
This is obvious.
Speaker 1 (21:04):
However, humans can greatly outdistance animals long term, so humans
have greater endurance, and this is from our sweating and whatnot.
But what like it says in the book is that
those animals that sweat and still have fur and protection
from the sun. And I know that you might be
thinking that, because that's one of the first things that
I thought when I was reading through this, But then
(21:26):
later on in the book it's gone over and explained,
so just compartmentalize that.
Speaker 4 (21:35):
Anyway.
Speaker 1 (21:35):
Let's take a quick break. You're listening to Crypto Chronicles.
Speaker 4 (22:45):
Do you like food?
Speaker 3 (22:46):
Do you not like going places? Do you like staying
home and having food brought to you? Well, you're in
luck because a thing called Blue Apron exists with multiple pricing.
There's a way to get the gourmet, delicious meals under
any budget, and it's totally worth. Cryptic Chronicles would not
promote Blue Apron unless it knew how good it is
for you. With all the junk and everything these days,
the majority of people sustain themselves on poison and don't
(23:09):
even know it. A healthy spirit, mind, and body requires
a healthy lifestyle and the ability to take care of
yourself and feed your body all the nutrients it needs
to function at its best in our highly demanding lives.
You get to choose your own meals. The chef designed
recipes include balanced Mediterranean delicacies, quick one pan dinners, and
top rated customer favorites. Unpack your home delivered box with
(23:31):
enthusiasm because there's a guarantee on freshness and the highest
quality of all Blue Apron products and ingredients. Create magic,
following our step by step instructions. You'll experience the magic
of cooking recipes that the master Blue Apron chefs created
with your family's tastes in mind, with step by step instructions,
so you never miss a beat and have to get
frustrated about making the meal. I know I do that
(23:51):
at least when I'm not eating A delicious Blue Apron
meal that is responsibly sourced quality ingredients like fresh produce,
sustainable seafood, and exclusive spice blends means you're going to
have a meal that stopped here over the common fast
food garbage most people eat. And Blue Apron cares about
the environment, which is another reason I love them so much.
With recyclable ice packs and packaging to ensure your ingredients
(24:12):
stay fresh until your home and ready and easily disposable
for the health of mother Earth, do yourself a favor
and take care of your body and mind the way
nature intended it with a healthy meal that's also gloriously delicious.
With Blue Apron, the yummy goodness is dropped off right
to your very doorstep. So if you like food and
you like not going places, then why not try Blue
Apron and give your mind a rest from going to
(24:33):
crowded grocery stores and writing a list of stuff to get,
only to forget half blue our own's got you.
Speaker 5 (25:00):
Hi there, Thanks for listening to Crypto Chronicles. The show
is sponsored by Blueberry, and if you're interested in starting
your own podcast user link We'll leave and give your
podcast a shout out. Go to Crypto Chronicles podcast dot
com and click on the Blueberry link on the homepage.
By doing so, you'll be helping the show. Blueberry is
optimized for iTunes as well as all podcast hubs. You
(25:20):
won't have to worry about expensive contracts or fees. In fact,
you won't have to leave your own website. You'll have
your own RSS, speed and no third party sites. Try
it for a month free by going through Crypto Chronicles
and Crypto Chronicles. Also, if you're a fan of cryptic content,
please support the show on Patreon. By giving just one
dollar a month, you can really assist us in posting
(25:41):
more content frequently. You'll also have access to bonus at
three episodes of the show and the Discord channel and
the Discord channel. To keep up with all Cryptic Chronicles content,
follow us on Twitter, Instagram, Tumbler, and of course Facebook.
Give the Facebook page you like and join the Crypto
Chronicles group. I'd love to hear from you. Thanks for
supporting the shows, well most of all.
Speaker 1 (25:59):
Th all right, we're back and we're talking about how
(26:38):
there's evidence that researchers have compiled that suggest that humans
might not actually be from Earth. Moving on to the
next part, Our bodies don't work right on Earth, and
we suffer physical afflictions more than other species to a
vast degree. As it's said in the book, Hypothetically, if
(27:01):
humans were dropped off on Earth or crash landed on Earth.
The reason anthropology shows us coming out of Africa is
because the light levels and warmth are the most consistent
on the planet, which would be the least likely place
to shock our bodily systems and give us a chance
to adapt to the Earth without all dying off like
(27:21):
fish out of water. It was probably incredibly harsh and taxing,
but survival would be probable when compared to if we
were dropped off on anywhere else on the planet. If
we were dropped off by aliens, it's possible the experiment
at dropping us off over many locations to experiment where
(27:43):
best we might be able to survive.
Speaker 4 (27:44):
And adapt.
Speaker 1 (27:46):
And also they could have changed our genome to make
us better adapt based on the data they got from
the people who died from exposure on Earth, who were
like scent in ahead of time, you know, and their
bodies weren't capable of adapting. So those all kinds of
hypothetic possibilities going on. The natural nature of humans is
to migrate and explore and colonize and spread. The fact
(28:09):
that in our mainstream history humanity was unable to colonize
and spread to many parts of the planet in our
early stages kind of backs up the theory that our bodies
were not yet suited to the environments. Otherwise, where there
is a way sh humans always find it to fulfill
(28:30):
our inbuilt instincts to explore and discover and wander. However,
in that far distant prehistory, humans were only able to
move out slowly over Earth, which it does indicate our
adaptation at work, But there are still many environments yet
suited for us. If you look at human history on Earth,
(28:52):
it is a story of trying to make the environment
suitable to us, when if we evolved here, the planet
should have suited us in the first place. Just like
all the other animal species on Earth. My bodies just
don't do well here. Some say cancer is a modern problem,
(29:12):
even though they are just ignorant, because there's evidence that
cancer goes back really, really, really far. I think the
oldest not necessarily in humans, but the oldest example is
one point six million years ago. But I digress, because
look around you. Basically everyone you know has some type
of issue. Don't get me wrong. Animals have issues too,
(29:35):
but not nearly on the same level, and it usually
only afflicts animal species in old age. The majority of
human afflictions are incredibly rare in animals. Not to mention
the pain receptor differences. Pain that a dog shrugs off
as nothing would make a human scream in agony. Animals
(29:56):
have it way easier concerning their biological conditions. On the
other hand, have biological issues a million times more than animals.
Why do human suffer so much more than animals by
a ridiculous degree. A common fallacy people try to counter
this idea with is that all these ailments and whatnot
(30:16):
are all modern afflictions caused by chemicals, microplastics, pesticides, processed food,
em waves, and on and on. I could listen a
lot more, and I'm sure that some are popping into
your head as I'm saying this. However, this just isn't
the case. There are some aspects, like when it comes
(30:36):
down to fertility, that's definitely an issue with all this
stuff I just mentioned, But a lot of things that
people think are modern ailments are not modern ailments at all,
and our ancestors suffered from them as well. You know,
there's also stuff like other than stuff like maybe you know,
(30:56):
like the modern man made viruses or this stuff that
popped up through mutations or whatever. You know, you could
think of like HIV as one. Anything recent that popped
up obviously wouldn't be going on back then. So there's
always exceptions to this. But in the book Humans Aren't
from Earth, the evidence goes into great detail of examples.
(31:18):
I don't really want to go in depth into them,
but let's just say they've been documented back to antiquity
and the earliest recorded history after all, asthma was even
documented by ancient Egyptians. Cancer has been found on human
skeletons one hundred and twenty thousand years old, and found
even further back on fossilizations. So the objective factual answer
(31:42):
is yes, our ancestors suffered from the same massive amounts
of afflictions we suffer from as a species in modern times.
In the book, there's all kinds of objections to this idea,
and Ellis Silver debunks them all with facts, and the
references are listed too, so anyone can go prove it
to themselves as well if they want, just get the book.
(32:05):
But essentially humans have had a harder time biologically than
any other species on the planet. The next idea is
(32:28):
we are not meant to eat meat, even though we can,
but biologically we really don't seem like we should from
an evolutionary biology sentence, not in a modern term sense,
because obviously we can eat meat. No, I'm not here
to preach to anybody about anything or push any modern
diet bads. I do personally happen to be mostly vegetarian,
(32:52):
but that's my business, and I don't really care in
the slightest what other people choose to eat or what
they do with their lives. So don't think that there's
any like agenda with me saying this. But Ellis gives
a convincing argument, and the research that our physiology does
not match that of a carnivore. The way our bodies
(33:14):
are shows natural selection pushing us into a plant based diet.
Even the American Diet Association states that for most of
human history we lived on a vegetarian or near vegetarian diet.
So those who say that's impossible or deadly in old
times and whatnot are just wrong.
Speaker 4 (33:33):
But that's okay.
Speaker 1 (33:33):
It doesn't matter because there's more to the story, and
some of the main forms of evidence for this idea
is our teeth, jaw, and digestive system. We are anatomically
designed to be herbivores from an evolutionary view on basic
comparison with carnivores. At least carnivores have claws. Herbivores don't
(33:54):
have claws, just like humans. Meat eaters don't have skin
pores sweat through their tongues, but herbivores sweat through skin pores.
Humans sweat through skin pores. Meat eaters have sharp teeth
and no flat molars for grinding. Herbivores don't have sharp
(34:15):
teeth and do have flat backed molars for grinding. Humans
don't have sharp teeth, and we too have flat molars
for grinding. The intestinal tracks don't match up either, our
saliva two is different from meat eaters, once again on
par with herbivores. Now, obviously humans can eat meat because
(34:36):
we've adapted through millennia of natural selection as well as
other technological discoveries. However, it is not a very good adaptation,
and we're still working on it even now. That's why
humans have to cook meat or we get sick. You know,
it has to be cured. Meat has to be processed
(34:59):
in some way before humans can consume it effectively. I mean,
we've been eating meat for a hell of a long
time now, but we are still, like biologically, not very
good at it. If it was a natural thing, it
shouldn't take all this processing and work. We should just
be able to eat that meat. It does give us
(35:19):
huge boosts of energy and protein, though, and that is
not easily replicated on a vegetarian diet. It was very
useful to our ancestors who were in dire states of survival.
So I'm not trying to say it's a negative thing,
just that it was not part of our original evolutionary process.
According to this, you know, all this information our bodies
(35:39):
were objectively herbivores, backed up by irrefutable evidence. The first
signs of butchering animals found through archaeology goes back super
far two point five million years ago. In fact, however,
(36:02):
archaeologists of the mainstream state that humans were not around
until three hundred thousand years ago. Who the hell was
butchering animals a million years ago? Well, we will get
into that mystery later.
Speaker 4 (36:14):
You just be patient.
Speaker 1 (36:16):
It gets weird ancient alien ancient modern human like lore.
But obviously ancient hominins were eating meat all that time ago,
and most likely humans started eating meat too the day
we arrived on Earth out of necessity and survival. We
can speculate that the plants found on Earth did not
(36:37):
give us the same nutrients that were on the plants
back on our homeworld or wherever we came from, so
eating meat had to happen or we'd be too weak
to survive in the harsh wilds of Africa. Something along
these lines is likely concerning our biological makeup. It could
also be that the plants on Earth are just fine
on a nutritional level, but they are just grifs to us,
(37:01):
unlike the plants from where we came from. It's also
likely that humans saw hominins eating meat and copied them,
such as the Neanderthals. There are many more scientific and
biological factors that put humanity in the herbivore camp that
I could go into, but I want to get too
stuck in the mud, and I think you get the point. Essentially,
(37:25):
the diet on Earth isn't the original diet. Our bodies
evolved to consume. Food is good too, but it actually
rots our teeth in excess. So the argument is, how
could humans have come into being through natural selection on
a planet where natural, healthy food rots our teeth, The
sun actively harms us, the oxygen damages our lungs. Our
(37:50):
bodies don't work right, the food doesn't match up to
our biology. We suffer more afflictions than any other species
on the planet, and basically every bacteria and virus is
out to get us. A steady found widespread tooth decay
and early hunter gatherers with evidence showing they would have
(38:11):
been in constant agony. So the counter argument to all
this not modern food and fruit and whatnot is genetically
altered to have more sugar. This argument doesn't work and
is easily debunked. These ancient humans just didn't have food
that matched up with their biology, our evolution would dictate
(38:32):
that we didn't have this problem earlier in our existence,
which doesn't quite add up. So our adoption of eating
meat was actually pretty advantageous, even if we're not originally
meant to the adoption of meat eating countered the inadequate
diet on Earth that was unsuitable to us based on
(38:53):
wherever we came from originally. And now let's look at
the next source of evidence that says humans might not
(39:14):
be from Earth, and that's that we can't drink the water.
On top of our food not matching up with the
evolutionary biology, humans possess the water.
Speaker 4 (39:26):
Too, is kind of an issue.
Speaker 1 (39:30):
Know the species on the planet has an issue with
the water, but humans can absolutely not drink from water.
Have you ever gone on a hike and drink the
river water and then had diarrhea for days? Yeah, that
doesn't happen to any other species on the planet.
Speaker 6 (39:50):
Now.
Speaker 1 (39:50):
Dogs can even drink from still water swirling with nasties
and be just fine. Humans, on the other hand, we
have to boil our water, either boil or have some
other kind of filter or treatment. In modern times, we
got chemical treatment, which is pretty neat unless it's the
kind that's like a neurotoxin stuff.
Speaker 4 (40:10):
But I have used.
Speaker 1 (40:14):
Iodine, that's what it's called iodine, when I've been backpacking.
Speaker 4 (40:18):
It's really the only way to.
Speaker 1 (40:20):
Drink from streams and whatnot while you're backpacking, unless you
want to get sick, that is, and you don't want
to get sick in the Montana wilderness. But the mystery
here is that both meat eater and herbivores on Earth
that are naturally evolved on Earth can drink from just
about any water source just fine. And we have the
(40:40):
internal intestine engine of a herbivore. So it kind of
doesn't make sense why humans have issues with drinking natural water,
other than the idea that this is not the water
that we originally developed to drink through our natural selection
of process and evolution and stuff like that. The water
wherever we came from was a different water. All the
(41:02):
resistances that we had developed over our millennia of progress
were useless to this new environment with different microorganisms. Species
from other Earth like planets coming here would suffer the
same kind of issues. An entire evolutionary process built up
fighting microbes of certain kind. That's when presented with a
(41:24):
new environment is utterly useless against microbes of a different biome.
This adds up to the conclusion that humans don't have
a fixed diet unlike all of the species on the planet,
and we have to bend over backwards and jump through
hoops to get what comes natural to all the other
species on Earth. Only humans need supplements and added processes
(41:48):
to consume a healthy diet. Another thing pointed out in
the book is the excessive growth of internal parasites that
humans have. This is actually really normal because pretty much
all creatures have worms and other parasites and microorganisms that
live in their guts. For the most part, this is
(42:10):
actually pretty beneficial or in most other cases, what's not
our natural go down there? It's harmless to symbiotic I
don't know, but anyway, The weird part is that when
they explain in a human.
Speaker 4 (42:26):
Gut, which for some reason, these things.
Speaker 1 (42:28):
Grow way larger than normal and multiply out of control.
Even they grow so big and multiply so fast that
in some cases it even kills people if not treated
in time. However, these same gross life forms don't do
this when inside any other species on the planet.
Speaker 4 (42:48):
Only humans.
Speaker 1 (42:49):
It's once again like our defenses are just not up
to par as the creatures who fully evolved on Earth.
Our defenses should be way better if we actually evolved
here through natural selection. And I there's a lot more
to this. I don't want to go into too much
detail because it's super gross, So let's move on, shall we?
(43:12):
Back problems? Ninety percent of all humans experience back problems
at one point in their lives. This issue is way
more common than we think, and roughly half the population
are walking around gritting their teeth, with a recent study
that concluded fifty percent of working adults walk around experiencing
back problems daily on a yearly basis. It is also
(43:36):
the single most common cause of disability globally, even over
the ones that like might more quickly pop into your mind.
Now it's back issues. Most people from the mainstream paradigm
will say that this is because we are bipeds and
walk up right on two legs, but the list of
different types of back problems don't add up to this
as a thing. You've got to remember too, how natural
(43:58):
selection works. So if being a biped always leads to
back pain, that inhibits our ability to survive and pro create, Hunt, fight,
and adapt. The natural selection would have ditched it a
long time ago or altered it in some way so
that it only affected us when we were useless like
an old age, like it does with animals kind of.
(44:20):
And not only that, even if natural selection thought that
bipedal was the design to go with, even though where
there's there were some flaws in the design, some kinks
in it, then it would have solved the problem by
now naturally on its own hundreds of thousands of years ago,
if not longer. And there is no evolutionary benefit to
back problems. People try to counter this by saying, you know,
(44:45):
being a biped is a new thing and evolution just
hasn't caught up yet. But that's totally us because there
have been bipeds on earth for millions of years. The
evidence shows that they were also way more robust than
us and probably didn't even have close to half the
issues we have. And Neanderthal has the strength of a
(45:05):
bodybuilder in its forearm and could easily be considered superhuman
and strength compared to us. Recent researchers discovered Neanderthals didn't
have back problems at all. There's a lot of theories
on why Neanderthals went extinct, and it seems likely the
most correct one is we killed them. Even though they
(45:27):
were much more robust and stronger than us, they didn't
have the ability for like they didn't have I don't
have to explain it, you know. They just weren't as
smart as us. But at least they didn't have back pain.
They're muscular. Limbar cyphosis allowed them to have backs that
lasted basically their whole lives in pristine condition. If humans
(45:51):
evolved on Earth, then we should actually have this same
type of robustness, but our spines suck even bent differently,
with not nearly as much micromuscular support. Humans have small
bits of Neanderthal DNA obviously, which I'm sure that you're
thinking of right now as I'm talking about all this,
which means that we actually might have gotten a small
(46:13):
amount of their robustness after interbreeding with them. But this
also means that we were most likely even weaker before
breeding with Neanderthals. Human height and size can actually fluctuate
based on nutrition of a society and the environment. The
(46:34):
alien food and gravity must have been horrific to adapt
to when we came over here from wherever we came from.
I mean, we are mostly stabilized now obviously, but in
the past human height and robustness could vary drastically from
group to group. This also changes muscle mass and bone density.
A bizarre nominally surrounding this is when astronauts go into space,
(46:55):
they lose muscle mass and bone density within days. It
doesn't even matter how much the exercise, and they have
all the nutrients their bodies could ever want or need.
There is no reason why the reverse shouldn't happen on Earth.
But even if that process took a few million years,
(47:16):
then we shouldn't have all the back problems that we have.
Humans adapt to space in a matter of days, but
we haven't even adapted to our own planet yet. Scientists
have concluded an estimate that concerning our biology, the gravity
of Earth is about twenty to forty percent too high
for us. And this is mainstream science here.
Speaker 4 (47:38):
So what the fuck?
Speaker 1 (47:40):
If we evolved on Earth, then our biology has had
up to seven million years to fix all these problems
through natural selection, but it hasn't, which defies logic, not
only back issues, but everything else. I've already mentioned the
conclusion from this body of evidence is humans evolved on
a planet with different gravity than Earth, and that's why
(48:01):
we have issues where all the other species on the
planet do not.
Speaker 5 (48:16):
One thing you can invest in that does not lose
value is gold and silver. There is no better place
to go for financial security than gold Co. Rated A
plus by the Better Business Bureau. Get the free twenty
twenty three gold iray kit Americans are using to protect
their retirement savings. Get your free twenty twenty three gold
IRA Kit at gold Cocoldkit dot Com. Gold Co is
(48:41):
a leader in the precious metals industry. From Precious Metals
IRA to direct purchases of precious metal coins and bars.
We partner with individuals seeking to diversify and safely grow
their retirement portfolios. Allow gold Coe to make your gold
and silver investments easy, seamless, and secure. Our investment is
in good hands.
Speaker 3 (49:02):
Chuck Norrith, what.
Speaker 5 (49:05):
Oh I'm recording.
Speaker 7 (49:08):
Thirty dollars off Weed with Code podcast? Did someone say
thirty dollars off weed with Code podcast? Amuse delivers over
five hundred high quality cannabis products from the Bay Area
brands you love at everyday low prices. You can also
rest assured that everything will be up to your high standards.
So what are you waiting for? Start shopping now at
amuse dot com. Use promo code podcast to save thirty
(49:31):
bucks off your next order. That's amusee dot com.
Speaker 2 (49:44):
Is your brain always hungry? Do you have a mental
appetite that often goes unstated? You may be suffering from
hungry brain syndrome, a debilitating and sometimes life threatening condition
experienced by humans who require double, sometimes even quadruple the
amount of mental nutrition needed to sustain the general population.
But now there's help. For years, our dedicated team of
(50:05):
world class researchers have been developing a thicker, more nutrient
dense podcasts specifically for sufferers of hungry brain syndrome, and
now we want to share it with you. All you
have to do is search for our podcast, The Whole
Rabbit in your podcast player of choice and select from
one of our delicious flavors like Slovenian succubied narcissism or
Ancient Egypt. It's no wonder The Whole Rabbit is the
most recommended treatment for hungary brain syndrome on the market.
(50:27):
So what are you waiting for? Try The Whole Rabbit today?
Do not listen with deep sea diving. Side effects may
include eating carrots and shooting lasers.
Speaker 8 (50:49):
Hello, dear listener, have you ever had a paranormal experience,
a spiritual or esoteric experience? Have you ever seen a
UFO or something that you could not explain? Have you
ever witnessed anomalous activity that defies reality? Have you ever
experienced unexplained mysteries of existence? If you have your own
cryptic tale and would like to have that shared on
(51:09):
the podcast, then call one eight hundred seven five seven
six zero four nine and leave a message of your experience.
If it's what Cryptic Chronicles is all about, then it
will be shared on the show. Just make sure you've
thought about what you will say ahead of time and
give a clear and concise account. Also make sure.
Speaker 5 (51:27):
To leave your name, where you're from, or.
Speaker 8 (51:29):
Any information that will assist in making a clear picture
to portray it to listeners of Cryptic Chronicles. Once again,
call one eight hundred seven five seven six zero four nine.
That's one eight hundred seven five seven six zero four nine.
We look forward to hearing from you.
Speaker 1 (52:11):
Many people also may not know that the human circadian
rhythm doesn't match the modern eight hour sleep cycle, which
goes along with the earth twenty four hour clock. This
is easily provable do scientific tests that always have the
same outcome, such as experiments where individuals are removed from
any external stimuli whatsoever and are placed in artificial environments
(52:32):
that don't give any clue as to what time of
day it is or whether it is day or night.
After around two weeks of adapting, the participants naturally always
alter to a twenty five hour cycle. So if humans
arrived on Earth around four hundred thousand years ago, we
(52:54):
still have not fully adapted to the twenty four hour
cycle of Earth. Also, some participants naturally would sleep in
two five hour cycles or two four and a half
hour cycles, whatever the case may be. The eight hour
sleep cycle of modern times isn't the natural one that
(53:16):
we fall into when external stimuli are removed, and people
who go into this natural state don't typically get jet
lag or have difficulty getting out of bed in the morning.
So if humans arrived on Earth around four hundred thousand
years ago, we still have not fully adapted to the
(53:37):
twenty four hour cycle of Earth. Also, some participants would
naturally sleep in two five hour cycles or to four
and a half hour cycles. Whatever the case may be,
the eight hour sleep cycle of modern times isn't the
natural one that we fall into when external stimuli is removed. However,
(53:59):
there are many counters to this, and it's elaborated upon
to a decent degree in the book, giving a bigger picture,
because there's also people who have screwy genetic wiring that
make their sleep patterns unique, such as people who feel
more awake at night and don't really like being awake
all throughout the day. I am one hundred percent one
(54:20):
of these people and feel far more awake at night
and prefer it. Also, over millions of years, the hours
in a day would definitely change, but where coming from
the perspective humans have only been on Earth for four
hundred thousand years. Another argument is that the length of
sleep some people require when compared to the general population,
(54:43):
can get pretty diverse, but as a general common denominator,
the twenty four hour day cycle is dropped almost immediately
naturally if humans are removed from external stimuli. This basically
means removing all ability to tell time or if it's
day or night. So humans just seem to be able
(55:05):
to survive on Earth, but not thrive. We also can't
sense the coming of natural disasters, but pretty much all
other creatures on Earth can, including spiders, and our natural
sense of direction is garbage compared to every other species
on the planet as well. We can also hardly see
(55:25):
the em spectrum on Earth or into basically any of
the other spectrums, and our hearing is also very subpar
when compared to all the other animals on Earth. Next,
(55:46):
we go into our lack of natural defense mechanisms and
modern predators. When the majority of humans were dropped off
in Africa around four hundred thousand years ago. According to
this narrative, the temperature there, because it was so stable
and consistent and warm, was the best for us to
(56:07):
adapt to Earth, but the place was swarming with predators.
If humans had naturally evolved on Earth in Africa, these
monsters would still have been there, and they would have
been a huge issue. Like think about modern Africa today
and multiply that by like one hundred thousand million. That's
(56:30):
how deadly it was with all these monsters everywhere. Yet
humans don't have any natural defenses. The beasts were stronger, faster,
hunted in well coordinated packs, had large claws, and massive
teeth and could hunt us nocturnally when we were at
our most vulnerable. Remember the other heminids like Neanderthals, Chrogue, magnum,
(56:53):
basically all of those guys. They were all much stronger
and more robust than humans to a great degree, and
Neanderthal could be pretty much, quite literally punch a lion's
face off. On the other hands, Homo sapiens sapiens not
so much. The only thing we have in our corner
(57:14):
is a higher intelligence and awareness. And by awareness, I
don't mean physical senses, I mean self awareness, consciousness. I
don't mean physical senses, being able to think abstract, see
the bigger picture, coordinate, plan, strategize. That's all we had
(57:38):
in our corner. Set in the book, humans aren't from Earth.
This isn't an evolutionary thing either. We didn't arrive on
Earth equipped with natural defense mechanisms sharp teeth, claws, speed, agility, strength, durability,
and so on, and then lost them and the need
(58:00):
went away. This isn't that factor. This isn't as if
we evolved on Earth, because we never had these defense
mechanisms in the first place.
Speaker 4 (58:13):
If humans had.
Speaker 1 (58:14):
Naturally evolved on Earth, then our biology would have been
well suited to defend ourselves against these beasts. People may
think that it wouldn't be too big of a deal,
but our modern day beast population is a tiny fraction
of how many there were.
Speaker 4 (58:30):
Back then. They would have been everywhere.
Speaker 1 (58:33):
And all humans just a single mistake away from a
grisly demise. We were outnumbered a billion to one. Our
biology suggests that the planet we evolved on didn't have
any natural predators towards us, and that would explain why
we don't have any natural defenses against the beasts of Earth.
Evidence shows that though humanity was mainly dropped off in
(58:56):
Africa in large number, they were dropped off elsewhere in
the world as well well, but in smaller numbers. And
one of these places was Israel, And we're going to
go deeper into that stuff next episode, like we'll go
deeper into those other locations and the evidence that support it.
(59:17):
Israel was not as dangerous as Africa, but it was
still pretty crazy.
Speaker 4 (59:23):
In the old days.
Speaker 1 (59:23):
There were bears, lions, wolves, leopards, and all kinds of
nasties that didn't have their populations in check, and so
much later down the line in historical narratives, but pretty
much anywhere humans were dropped off four hundred thousand years
ago was insanely deadly. An argument in the book that
(59:44):
the author goes over is, well, humans don't need natural
defenses against monsters because of our intelligence. We could sharpen
sticks and form groups for protection.
Speaker 4 (59:58):
And yeah, this is.
Speaker 1 (59:59):
All well and good, but it kind of misses the
point to develop our level of intelligence, self awareness and
all that good stuff. Develop our consciousness to the level
that it is. That would have been a huge aspect
of our evolution over possibly millions of years, not just
(01:00:19):
pop up out of nowhere four hundred thousand years ago.
Speaker 4 (01:00:23):
And at the same.
Speaker 1 (01:00:24):
Time we would lose all of our robustness and ability
to defend ourselves biologically. That makes sense, right, It wouldn't
have happened like this, and the natural defenses we would
have needed before that would have taken hundreds of thousands
of years for natural selection to decide that we didn't
(01:00:45):
need it anymore. Look at primates. They are insanely stronger
than humans and have thicker skins and are much more robust,
much like the earlier hominid bipeds, chromagnums and neanderthals. Punch
Aline's face off, and their skin would also have been
resistant to their claws and teeth. Humans are not even
(01:01:06):
remotely close to this type of primal prowess. It would
have been a long time before our intelligence would bear fruit,
but once it did and we had our bearings on Earth,
it was on. It probably took a long time to
adapt to Earth, but after we did, it was only
(01:01:27):
a matter of time before we would be able to
fight back against the monsters if we survived that is,
which luckily we did. In the book Humans Aren't from Earth,
the author suggests that this intellect may not have been
as pronounced back when we were dropped off. It's possible
whatever put us here saw how unequipped we were and
(01:01:47):
were getting wiped out by the monsters. The author suggests
that whatever placed us here saw this and either pushed
us to mix with Neanderthals or spliced some other sort
of DNA to up our brain power and even the odds.
(01:02:19):
Another aspect of our biology that is perplexing is that
though our bodies are spot on herbivores, we do not
have eyes on the sides of our heads.
Speaker 4 (01:02:28):
In nature.
Speaker 1 (01:02:28):
On Earth, all predators and carnivores have eyes on the
front of their heads, which is ideal for hunting. This
evolutionary biology says that we evolved to be hunters, but
and this is the kicker, not eat what we hunted,
which is quite bizarre concerning species in existence that we
(01:02:51):
know of. What is what this odd mix actually suggests
is that we evolved to hunt other humanoids but not
eat them, which fits perfectly with the underlining shadow of humanity,
that is violence. We didn't evolve to have any natural
(01:03:16):
predators other than each other. We evolved to hunt each
other based off of our biology.
Speaker 6 (01:03:24):
Dark ray.
Speaker 1 (01:03:27):
But that's what this researcher suggests. Despite our fragility concerning
all other species and past humanoids like Chromagnum and Neanderthal,
all that good stuff going down that line, humans are
natural soldiers and our natural predator is ourselves or maybe
some other type of humanoid species of alien that we
(01:03:48):
don't have any idea of. That was back on our
home planet or wherever we came from. However, that's a
different story we'll talk about later. And with the vegetation
not as nutrient wherever we came from, it could be
a sign that it was a planet on decline, or
that we were on the brink of extinction and that's
(01:04:09):
why whoever put us here on Earth brought us here.
But that's just speculation, and I go into this a
lot later. So hold on to that idea, because without
natural predators and the abundance of modern civilization, our overpopulation
is damaging the planet, according to this researcher. But again
(01:04:29):
we'll go into that later next episode. And don't worry,
you know, I won't preach to you about anything and
tell you how to think, so don't worry about that.
I'm just covering this as objectively as I can. And
if you thought that we were going to like a
utopian origin idea of humanity, sorry to disappoint you. This
(01:04:50):
idea of humans being natural warriors beats into later speculation
that Earth is our prison. Perhaps at one point we
were a highly advanced in our stellar species that struck
out into the stars and brought our violence with us,
and an alien civilization a billion years more advanced than us,
(01:05:11):
said nope, then wrecked our face. But instead of wiping
us out, they chose to let us survive, but placed
to somewhere we couldn't hurt anyone couldn't hurt anybody in
the galactic community. Maybe the other aliens of the galaxy
are scared of us, or maybe not scared of us,
(01:05:31):
but scared of what we could become and the threat
that we could be towards other alien civilizations, especially peaceful
ones or ones that can't defend themselves. Maybe Earth isn't
quarantine from the rest of the galactic community, and it's
our prison. But I'm going to go into the whole
(01:05:54):
what if Earth is our prison hypothesis in the bonus
segment for supporters. For now, let's look at the next topic,
our odd reaction to carbon dioxide. Another thing that makes
it seem like humans might not be from Earth is
our reaction to carbon dioxide. If Earth is our home planet,
(01:06:15):
we probably shouldn't have such reactions because all the other
species on the planet have very quick reaction to rising
carbon dioxide.
Speaker 4 (01:06:22):
Levels, whereas humans do not.
Speaker 1 (01:06:25):
Animals will wake up from sleeping every single time, but
people will just snooze right through it to their doom.
Humans either get sleepy from it, or if already asleep,
go into an even deeper sleep. And this is bad
for avoiding a whole bunch of different fatal possible situations
that humans constantly find themselves in throughout their lives. What's
(01:06:48):
even stranger about this is that it remains unexplained why
humans react this way to carbon dioxide, but all other
species on Earth act the opposite. The next bizarre thing
(01:07:08):
about humanity's relationship with Earth is our children's adverse nature
to eating vegetation, and this is a pretty universal aspect
of childhood across all cultures. I'm pretty sure in the
book says yes, this is universal. It's possible that this
is natural selection at work. It is a leftover of
(01:07:29):
when we were dropped off on Earth around four hundred
thousand years ago, when we were very unfamiliar with the
vegetation of the planet, and a lot of it was
poisonous or dangerous to eat, just like it is in
modern times. Kids had no natural ability to discern what
was okay to eat and what wasn't, and you know,
or leon, neither did the adults. So it makes sense
that this would become kind of like a natural selection
(01:07:51):
evolutionary instinct, as like a drive of survival. In modern times,
kids don't like vegetable even though we are natural herbivores.
This is another aspect that separates humans from other species
on the planet, because animals actually don't have issues with
eating poisonous plants.
Speaker 4 (01:08:10):
Did you know that? I didn't know that.
Speaker 1 (01:08:12):
They naturally just understand what they can eat and what
they cannot. They don't even have to worry about it.
Not humans, though, And if humans evolved on Earth, shouldn't
we be able to have this ability to How come
the rest of the species on the planet know that
you can't eat those mushrooms, but we don't, And every
other animal on the planet can do this from birth
(01:08:33):
with no direction. It doesn't make sense, right And from
this idea, if we ever returned to wherever we came from,
we would probably instinctively just know what stuff we can
eat and what we can't. We wouldn't even have to
think about it, and it would probably trip us out
pretty hard. And the next topic is birth issues. No
(01:09:10):
other species on the planet has the birth issues that
humanity has. Giving birth is ridiculously less dangerous and painful
to all other species on the planet.
Speaker 4 (01:09:22):
Now, I know, from.
Speaker 1 (01:09:23):
A religious point of view, we have an answer to this,
but we don't from a mundane, secular, scientific evolutionary point
of view, and that point of view that why humans
suffer this way is only from specific Abrahamic religions. If
even the slightest thing goes wrong for humans giving birth,
(01:09:47):
we're screwed. I mean, modern medicine is great, but concerning
human history, like the human story on Earth, it's not
really a thing.
Speaker 4 (01:09:56):
Right. We've only had.
Speaker 1 (01:09:58):
Basically modern medicine making birthing safer for like the blink
of an eye, all things concerned. I mean, historically, primate
type animals give birth with plenty of room to spare,
but humans throw a hot dog through the eye of
a needle. In the old days, a woman with narrow
(01:10:18):
hips giving birth was basically a death sentence. And on Earth,
female bodies just don't quite sink up for birth. Now,
is this a gravity thing? The author says that this
probably plays a factor, but it could also be other
unknown factors, such as hybridizing with Neanderthals to a degree
(01:10:39):
we just don't know. Also, when compared to all the
other species on the planet, with primates as a particularly
good example, is that human babies take a ridiculously long
time to do anything and are pretty useless and helpless.
Even primates can cling to their mothers after just a
couple of days of being born, but human brains require
(01:11:00):
an insane amount of time to start getting heated up
and the engine running right. The research argues that this
is because we have to learn everything from scratch, because
we have little to know pre programmed instincts to live
on Earth. Like all the other species on the planet
do they just get it naturally. In the end, our
intelligence does make up for this, but it starts us
(01:11:22):
with a bad hand essentially. And despite all that, it's
safe to say that spotted hyaenas have it way worse
than humans, but they are likely the only species on
Earth that has worse birth issues than humans. Also, as
far as science knows, no other species but humans suffer
from morning sickness when pregnant, and I know this either
(01:11:43):
until reading this book. Maybe it's because the unborn children
growing up in the womb are rejecting the Earth's sustenance
being given by the mother who's in an alien environment
in comparison to our evolutionary norm. On top of this,
they're one of the few species on Earth to have
hidden ovulation, and science has debated for decades if men
(01:12:06):
can tell if a woman is ovulating subconsciously or through pheromones,
but there is still no consensus. But basically all other species,
the males can easily tell if the female's ovulating or not.
Fully concealed ovulation is incredibly rare, with dolphins being the
(01:12:27):
other example, and if you remember the Alien Races episodes,
some people out there actually do believe that dolphins are aliens.
Speaker 4 (01:12:35):
Anyway, that's all for the Normal Show.
Speaker 1 (01:12:40):
In the supporter bonus segment, we're going to go into
how Earth could be a prison planet, as well as
the possible violent evolution of humanity through this mysterious place
we came from.
Speaker 4 (01:12:51):
Hope to see you there. If not.
Speaker 9 (01:13:12):
Usial usual usual usual, usual, usial usual, bush, pustashtash Sasha
(01:13:42):
school usual, hush usual, usial usual, hush, usual, usual, hush.
Speaker 6 (01:14:38):
That's all for today's episode. I hope you enjoyed this
first part of Humans or Not from Earth. I haven't
decided yet if I'm gonna do the next one right
away or I'm gonna kind of do some episodes and
other topics and then come back to this one. But
I'm definitely gonna do the second part of this soon ish,
(01:14:59):
because they're still a lot more to cover anyway. Crypto
Chronicles is available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Podbean, Spreaker, Stitcher,
Google Podcasts, and then basically all podcast hubs. You look
for us and we're there. If you can listener, please
make sure to like, share, comment, or review wherever you
hear this content. The interaction makes algorithms like the episode
(01:15:21):
and so will help spread it and grow the show.
Though Crypto Chronicles is free to listen to, the cost
to produce it and sustain it is substantial. By pleasing
the gods of the algorithm, you are doing more than
your part and support, as well as ensuring that this
show goes on forever until my last breath. And if
you like Crypto Chronicles and you happen to be awesome,
(01:15:45):
then support the show either on Patreon, Subscribe, Star, PayPal, whatever.
Depending on the pledge, you can unlock all kinds of
goodies and even have a show dedicated to a topic
of yours choosing, or come on the show and co
host with me and the first The first pledge is
the dollar and get it break the bank. You'll get
full uncensored shows with no ads, as well as bonus
(01:16:08):
segments and exclusive content only on Patreon or you know
as a supporter, so with all the other platforms I
use for that as well. Just go to cryptochronicles dot
com and at the top click on the Chronicles vault.
It's a link to Patreon, so you'd be good to go.
Merely means a lot to me. Thank you, and as
(01:16:29):
always i'd like to thank some of my supporters MJ. Calvo,
Adrian Celestial Weavers, Alien X, Lorna Grubb, Linda Gonzalez, Angela Dlaire,
just Nick, Matthew Lawson, Trusty Old Sempi, Brandon Wigglesworth, Cody George,
Annie the Down, Emily Schmemily six ' one, Zane Servius,
(01:16:51):
Paul Robert Roxandy Flynn, Alberto Elijah, Uria, Oakes, Dave Baxter,
b Messina, Don't Father asking why, Miran Gottet, Nyrizard, Brandy Carter,
Amanda Jean, Lord of the Flies, k Vision, Carlos Moran, Takasa,
and all my other supporters that I didn't mention because
(01:17:13):
there's so many now, thank you so much for supporting
Crypto Chronicles, but most of all, thanks for listening. And
as the greatest Roman emperor who ever lived, once said
be tolerant with others and strict with yourself, self self, self,