Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
This is a clip from BGCST.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
You can access the entire episode now on our website
and all podcast platforms.
Speaker 1 (00:10):
I can see these small actions have these profound effects
when it comes to reality, these large actions, and then
I would even say, we have massive actions. So yes,
keep going, man.
Speaker 2 (00:26):
The thing is, it can't rewrite physical reality. Is one
thing I realized because anybody, I've had the same Bible
for like twenty five years, it's always said the you know,
as far as me reading it, had always said in
the line would lay down with the lamb. And somebody said,
well those have been altered that now, says Wolf, And
(00:48):
I was like, okay, whatever, cool, pop it open. Sure enough,
the same Bible I have had here for twenty five
years now, says Wolf. Interesting, it's not an internet edit.
It's my Bible, and it actually the words, and it changed.
(01:08):
I think what they I think these Mandela effects are
able to change the documentation but not the memory, which
makes it a whole lot easier to hide to seven
and fifty years of history, massive rituals, and a lost
civilization in the ruins. You want to say, you want
to hear.
Speaker 1 (01:27):
A story, Yes, let's dive into this. Man, I'm looking
forward to this, and especially especially the the little bit
of evidence you are going to bring to the table,
because that's what absolutely blew my mind.
Speaker 2 (01:42):
Well, let's break it down. I discovered somebody in the
course of history diving by the name of Gunnar Heinsen,
and I'm not German. I apologize for the mispronunciation that
I know I just did. But mister Heindson, I should
say doctor. The man had two masters, he's no idiot,
(02:03):
and he was an archaeologist. So being the naturally inquisitive
crowd that he was, he ran through and said and
was looking at Rome. Okay, Rome collapsed during a massive catastrophe,
and around the year two hundred eight, thought, okay, that fits,
that fits everything. Constantinople also collapsed around six hundred in
(02:28):
a massive catastrophe. That's a little bit odd that you'd
have two major civilizations collapsed from essentially the same cause
four hundred years apart. He thought, well, are there any
other catastrophes, because you know, once is the occurrence, twice's coincidence,
third is oops. And it turns out most of the
(02:48):
Persian Empire was crumb went through a massive catastrophe and
crumbled around nine five. He thought that there's no way
this can be a coincident, that you could have cities
destroyed in massive disasters, end of civilization grade stuff. They
(03:09):
estimated that the casualties in Rome were ninety five percent.
Let that one sink in, and there's no way you're
going to have three things that happened three different times
over the course of one hundreds of years. It doesn't
make sense. And he thought, well, this sounds insane, but
what if it was the same catastrophe. He thought, Okay,
(03:30):
that's mad. Do I have any proof for this? And
he's like, well, I would have to prove that they
coexist at the same time. And I will spare you
a lot of detailed talk on this, but I've sent
the links to Stephen. They'll probably be listed in the
YouTube video description at some point. They're fascinating videos. I
(03:55):
would encourage you to go read through them, because I'm
condensing two months worth of work into two hours. What
he found was archaeological stratigraphy. Now, if you have a
civilization that has built and lived in an area and
it collapses and another civilization inhabits the same area, you'll
(04:16):
see artifacts from the first and then kind of a
layer with artifacts from the second, so you can get
a good idea of you know, these people came first,
then these because they built over top, and these because
they built over top. And he thought, well, surely we'd
see strata in Roman ruins, right, you'd expect it. I
(04:38):
mean they went out into two hundreds, it's now twenty
twenty five. You'd expect to see strata. There are no
in over four thousand sites in Europe of Roman nature.
There are no strata between Rome and around the year
(04:58):
eleven hundred. That's you have one layer here at two
hundred AD, and about nine fifty you have the next
layer of civilization. Nothing happened between those two, all the
(05:18):
the Dark Ages, the Middle Ages, the Low Middle Ages,
the High Middle Ages, all that. It goes straight from
Rome to High Middle Ages. And he's like, surely there
has to be a site. There's none. He checked over
four thousand archaeological reports. There are no occurrences of anything
between anything between Roman and about nine fifty. Strata would
(05:42):
be like if you ever look at a road cut,
you'll have different layers of dirt, so you'd have layers
of Roman, like in in Jerusalem you'd have Hebrew habitation,
then the Assyrian occupation, Babylonian occupation later on era Box occupation.
Each one of those would contain artifacts. There's no artifacts
(06:04):
between Roman at two hundred eighty and Middle Ages at
they go straight from one to the other. And it
actually he actually solved one of the mysteries because Sarlomagne's
castle is this massive castle built around that time.
Speaker 1 (06:24):
Yes, don hold, let me answer don real quick. Yeah, So, like,
don have you ever seen like when they try to
have you ever seen when they cut the earth? I
don't know if you've seen any of like the you know,
if you've ever watched National Geographic or anything like that,
and they'll tell you all the different time periods as
they're going down the dirt, Like the top layer of
(06:47):
dirt is the most recent time period, and then as
you go down you get to like a thousand years ago,
you know, fifty thousand years ago or vice versa. So
that's exactly layers of dirt. But continue Nick, this would.
Speaker 2 (07:03):
The mystery of Charlemagne's castle was that he had a
massive castle built in about nine hundred ish and there
was no village around it. There was no place for
any of the shops, tradesmen, any of that around it.
It was just a castle, a very large castle, and
(07:25):
then right next to it is a Roman village with
no fort. And he basically went one plus one equals too.
I'm cutting this horrifically short. But his assessment, and he
has a lot had a lot of evidence to back
(07:45):
this up, is that everything from two hundred AD to
nine p fifty a d was inserted in the timeline.
It did not ever happen because you cannot provide artifacts
between the Roman period and that Middle Ages period. There's
(08:08):
nothing between it. It goes from one to the other.
It'd be like if you dug down into your backyard
looking for the sewer line and instead you found an
Aztec pyramid.
Speaker 1 (08:22):
No exactly.
Speaker 2 (08:23):
So he said it was a pretty reasonable conclusion. And
I am going to have if I look over it's
because I'm checking my notes. I've got to actually keep
them track this time.
Speaker 1 (08:34):
Oh you're okay, man, No, no, no, no worries. No worries.
Speaker 2 (08:40):
One of the other interesting things in any engineering among
you will appreciate it. But one of his biggest evidences
came from doing chemical testing and glass. The glass that
the Romans used in their buildings, big pieces, and they're
not talking like the mosaic pieces had identical chemical opposition
(09:01):
to the stuff used in the Middle Ages. Stuff the
castles had the same glass down to the isotope numbers
that the Roman villages had and these are supposedly seven
hundred and fifty years apart, it's the same batch.
Speaker 1 (09:18):
This is just mind blowing in a lot of ways too,
because you know, like this is this is good evidence,
because we're using even today's consensual science to dissect this,
I mean in that and he was actually running these
tests like in a way that you can physically see
(09:42):
the evidence and showcase it. Man, it's beyond wild. It's
beyond wild, and it just brings like I said, it
brings up even more questions.