From Charlie Kirk’s Assassination to Censoring You Is This the Blueprint to End Freedom

From Charlie Kirk’s Assassination to Censoring You: Is This the Blueprint to End Freedom?

https://rumble.com/v6z3oxm-from-charlie-kirks-assassination-to-censoring-you-is-this-the-blueprint-to-.html

https://gorightnews.com/from-kirks-assassination-to-censoring-you-is-this-the-blueprint-to-end-freedom/

https://youtube.com/live/UKwaf04Ci-E

https://www.spreaker.com/episode/from-charlie-kirk-s-assassination-to-censoring-you-is-this-the-blueprint-to-end-freedom--67863826

Congress is dragging tech CEOs into hearings over Charlie Kirk’s assassination, but the real target is your speech. From COVID lockdown censorship to 2020 election suppression, tragedy is being used as the pretext to silence America and attack the First and Second Amendments.

#FreeSpeech, #FirstAmendment, #SecondAmendment, #ProtectEncryption, #TechCensorship, #GoRight, #CharlieKirk, #DefendDissent

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/goright-with-peter-boykin-gorightnews-com--3096608/support.

📰 Read More About Peter Boykin:

📖 Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Boykin

📖 https://PeterBoykin.com

📢 LISTEN & WATCH:

🎧 Podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/show/goright-with-peter-boykin

📺 Rumble Videos: https://rumble.com/GoRightNews

📺YouTube Videos: http://youtube.com/@PeterBoykinForAmerica

📘 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GoRightNewsOfficial

🌐 Visit the Hub  — Home of #GoRightNews:  https://GoRightNews.com 

💬 Follow Peter Boykin:

🔵 Telegram: https://t.me/RealPeterBoykin

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:06):
What's this that canceled? Exactly canceled. This is hashtag go
right with Peter Boykin, and we're talking about from Charlie
Kirk's assassination to censoring you is the blueprint to end freedom?

(00:28):
You could follow about this on go rtnews dot com
and more information. So the story begins with single image,
a viral Oversight Committee post on x formerly Twitter showed
flashing red siren, the logos of Discord, Theme, Twitch and

(00:51):
Reddit and the faces of tech leader suddenly cast as villain.
The message Congress is calling for them to explain how
radicals exploited their platforms in the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Now,
at first glance, it looks like accountability, but the deeper

(01:12):
story is darker. This is not simply about Charlie Kirk.
His murder is being used as a lever, a sacrifice
to accelerate the long running scheme to chip away at
our first amendment. Batting off they were messing with our
second Amendment. Now they're messing with the first amendments and
eventually to set the stage for an attack on our second,

(01:36):
which is what they're doing. The vessel is the voice, folks.
The first Amendment was written to prevent government from silencing citizens.
For over two centuries, it worked, but the loophole has
finally been exploited. Government doesn't have to pass walls to
censor you. It just pressures corporation. If you control the vessel,

(02:02):
the platforms people used to speak, you can control the voice.
The modern public square is not the town hall. It's
the algorithm. Whoever manipulates it decides who gets heard and
who gets silent. And a lot of people use that
against me, and they're like, nobody's listens to your video.
There's no views. You know, well, I'm not paying to

(02:24):
boost it. And a lot of times it gets squished
and squandered. I know, a long time ago, before they
started messing with me, I had over half a million
followers on Twitter. It's talking to celebrities and everything that
kicked knew I was running for office. They assassinated my

(02:48):
digital online presence, probably a little bit better than being
assassinated person. Now, it took two hundred and fifty years,
but they found a way to punch through the First
Amendment without ever touching the Constitution. By intimidating our regulating
private company. They created censorship by proxy, and once the

(03:13):
voice is controlled, every other right becomes easier to attack,
especially the right to bear arms. Let's start with COVID.
In the silencing of dissent, the blueprint for the scheme
was tested. During COVID, citizens were told to shut up,
stay home, trust the silence, and stop questioning. Authority moved

(03:36):
on the Facebook and and the Biden administration. Mark Zuckerberg
admitted that the White House pressured Meta to remove posts
about COVID nineteen satire descent and even legitimate scientific debate
were scrumped. The government couldn't legally silence you, so they
learned on. They leaned on platforms to do it instead.
Remember this is the same platform. I don't agree with

(03:58):
them that they wiped out everybody that talked about Q
and on everything that's Q and on. They wiped out
everything about the Proud Boy. But yet spammers, fake profiles,
pornography and stuff still there didn't do anything about it.

(04:18):
And that's when science became the narrative. The lockdowns, the
vaccine mandates, and the mass debates were declared untouchable. To
question them with labeled quote it's misinformation some people called
misinformation is hate speech. Countless accounts were suspended are deplatformed,
including politicians who raised concerns about liberty elections and medical freemen.

(04:40):
We did rally about it, and I risk getting canceled
multiple times, but like you canceled me one, how many
times you're gonna cancel me? The mechanism is controlled. The
phrase unfounded became the hammer. The truth didn't matter. What

(05:02):
mattered was silencing. Citizens learned that if you broke the narrative,
you lost your platform. COVID was never just a pandemic.
It was a test run for censorship at a scale,
and it worked. Then moved to twenty twenty election in
the Great Censory. The twenty twenty election became the next battlefield,
including the hunter Lockbiden laptops. When The New York Post

(05:25):
broke the story, Facebook and Twitter throttled it the excuse
quote hack and leak warnings from federal agencies. Later, much
of that was proven wrong, and the suppression, however, worked.
One of the most consequential stories of the election was buried,
which led to election to sent post questioning mail in

(05:46):
ballots voting their regularities. Our election audits were labeled as misinformation,
Some were deleted outright citizens weren't convinced or to by debate.
They were silenced by corporate decreed. I ran for office
at the time. I lost a channel on YouTube because
they wouldn't let me talk about election integrity, which is

(06:10):
a huge thing when it comes to politics. There were
government meetings, regular show records show that platforms were in
regular meeting with agencies about election content. Guidance quickly turned
into censorship demand. And this was no accident. It was
a state or outsourcing censorship, laundering it through Silicon Valley

(06:35):
to skirt the First Amendment. And the only reason I
think we kind of broke that mold is because Elon
must spit money to buy X And then Zuckerberg kind
of realized what was going on and he calmed down.
But they're going after their other platforms, and that's the
slippery slope of hate speech, folks. The most dangerous trick

(06:57):
in the book is redefining speech as hate. When Republicans
are in power, the promise is the silence Antifa and
radical lessons. When the Democrats take over, MAGA becomes domestic terrorism.
Just as President Biden himself, who labeled Trump supporters as extremists,
even terrorists. Once that line has crossed, the sense is criminalized.

(07:22):
During COVID, specticism was treated as hate. During twenty twenty,
questioning elections was treated as hate today, criticizing government policy
risky platforming. If we talk about you know, I'm the
leader of gage Trump, but if we talk about trans
people and other things that have to do with the LGBT,

(07:43):
you talk about, you know, things that having to do
with blacks, like the individual that kills that white girl
in Charlotte. The mental things like that could be labeled
as hate. We can't talk about the Jews, we can't
talk about the Muslims, we can't talk about anything, because
everything's going to be called hate tomorrow. Hate speech may
simply mean voting the wrong way. Whoever controls the definition

(08:08):
of hate controls the country. So here's some potential issues
in the free speech debate. America as the gate kicker
of liberty. For more than two centuries, the world has
looked toward the United States as the model of free expression.
The First Amendment isn't just an American invention, it's a

(08:28):
global standard. And when America chips away at free speech,
the ripple effects are felt everywhere. If we allow loopholes
in corporate censorship. The redefined speech here other nations will
follow and thus becomes the weaponis station of hate speech.
Hates speech sounds like a noble cause, but it's a

(08:51):
political weapon. The term itself is subjective. One administration uses
it the silence Antifa, A Number one uses the silence
mac The danger is that whoever defines it, whoever defines it,
wins the power to decide what Americans are allowed to say.
That's the law. It's controlled by vocabulary. And like they said,

(09:14):
the winners are who writes history. So what is actually illegal?
Free speech protections are not unlimited. The law already draws lines.
Direct threats, incitement to violence, criminal conspiracies, and radicalization into
violent groups are not protected. Now those are crimes, and

(09:34):
they should be handled by law enforcements. By equating unpopular
opinions our controversial political speech with crime is a shortcut
to tyranny. So here's the global stakes. When Americans accept censorship,
the rest of the world, or the rest of the
free world, loses its anchor. If the gatekeepers of liberty

(09:56):
become gatekeepers of narratives, then the short of free expression
becomes dark America's enemies watch and smile as we dismantle
ourselves from within, which leads to a sacrifice to close
the public square. Some believe Charlie Kirk's assassination was more

(10:18):
than a personal tragedy. It was a sacrificial act used
as a pretext to launch a full scare war on
free speech. Whether or not coordination has ever proven, the
pattern is undeniable. Take a horrific event, amplify it, and
then use it as justification to close the gates of

(10:40):
the public square. That's how liberty is dismantled, not overnight,
but brick by brick, app by app. Again, let's talk
about Charlie Kirk. The sacrifice in the pretext. Charlie Kirk's
death shocks, griefs angers, and that's exactly the opportunity those

(11:01):
needing for speech control need. This theory holds that his
assassination is being used as a sacrificial accident or incident.
The narrative radical voices calls this platforms failed to stop radicalization.
If the public is riled up enough, regulations follow, platform

(11:22):
restrictions follow, hidden censorship becomes acceptible. Whether or not the
sacrifices plan, someone is benefiting the public square shrinks, privacy arose,
control shifts away from people and toward corporations and government.
And I question this, if you make it harder and

(11:44):
harder and harder to find those those really bad people,
big are getting in darker and darker and darker corners,
and that's puts our safety at risk. To raver them,
expose themselves up in public, keeping an eye on them
and taking them down when needed, then to shut down
the whole system. Now what the CEOs really should answer for?

(12:06):
If Congress truly wants to wants accountability, they should stop
pretending CEOs or speech police and start asking the real questions.
Who bids and sells user data? How are algorithms amplify
and outrage while silencing dissent, Why does spam fries while
political speech disappears. What backroom deals exist between the government

(12:30):
and tech companies to coordinate censorship that's discord, What contracts
to tie these platforms to intelligence agencies? And why are
encrypted apps like telegrams speared when their only crime is
protecting privacy? These are the questions that exposed power. Everything

(12:51):
else is just the ear, and this is why they
fear encryption platforms like telephone telegrams terrify the cover because
they can't be spied on. Ended in concryption means conversations
are private, not even the servers can read them. They
say that is exactly why bureaucrates. Bureaucrats hate they hate it.

(13:15):
They say that extremists hide there and truth. Encryption protects
dissonance journalists and ordinary citizens. Privacy is not the enemy
of freedom. It is as shield. And if encryption falls,
liberty follows. And that's it, folks. If you want to
get the rest, you have to check out the other

(13:35):
podcast where I talk about the description, I talk about
Charlie Kirk and the blueprint of tyranny. If you want
to check us out, you can check us out on
all the platforms while I'm still there on Go writnews
dot com, We're on Spreaker, We're on Spotify, We're on Apple,
We're on YouTube one of the youtubes. We're on Rumble

(13:58):
really great put platform, True Social Rumble, that's Rumble dot com, Slash,
Go write News, check us out. Please share this and
speak out, folks, speak out while we still have a voice.
Do not think that if you give the government just
a little bit more power, just a little bit more power,

(14:20):
just a little bit more safe, just a little bit
more safe. Fill Me, nineteen eighty four. Thank you, bye,
God bless every really bye