September 17, 2025 • 15 mins
Who Ordered the Hit on Charlie Kirk? Lone Gunman or Orchestrated Political Hit? Part 1
https://rumble.com/v6z2uk8-who-ordered-the-hit-on-charlie-kirk-lone-gunman-or-orchestrated-political-h.html
https://gorightnews.com/who-ordered-the-hit-on-charlie-kirk-lone-gunman-or-orchestrated-political-hit/
https://www.youtube.com/live/gZdcMZNR1AE?si=nN6qd2skt9fJLkTG
https://www.spreaker.com/episode/who-ordered-the-hit-on-charlie-kirk-lone-gunman-or-orchestrated-political-hit-part-1--67795857
Charlie Kirk’s murder has unleashed a storm of theories: Antifa plots, FBI false flags, Discord cover ups, even elite leadership sabotage. The official story names one suspect, but Americans are demanding transparency, not narratives.
#CharlieKirk #PoliticalViolence #GoRight #FBI #Discord #CandaceOwens #Leadership #TruthMatters #ConstitutionalRepublic #GoRightNews
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/goright-with-peter-boykin-gorightnews-com--3096608/support.
📰 Read More About Peter Boykin:
📖 Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Boykin
📖 https://PeterBoykin.com
📢 LISTEN & WATCH:
🎧 Podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/show/goright-with-peter-boykin
📺 Rumble Videos: https://rumble.com/GoRightNews
📺YouTube Videos: http://youtube.com/@PeterBoykinForAmerica
📘 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GoRightNewsOfficial
🌐 Visit the Hub — Home of #GoRightNews: https://GoRightNews.com
💬 Follow Peter Boykin:
🔵 Telegram: https://t.me/RealPeterBoykin
https://rumble.com/v6z2uk8-who-ordered-the-hit-on-charlie-kirk-lone-gunman-or-orchestrated-political-h.html
https://gorightnews.com/who-ordered-the-hit-on-charlie-kirk-lone-gunman-or-orchestrated-political-hit/
https://www.youtube.com/live/gZdcMZNR1AE?si=nN6qd2skt9fJLkTG
https://www.spreaker.com/episode/who-ordered-the-hit-on-charlie-kirk-lone-gunman-or-orchestrated-political-hit-part-1--67795857
Charlie Kirk’s murder has unleashed a storm of theories: Antifa plots, FBI false flags, Discord cover ups, even elite leadership sabotage. The official story names one suspect, but Americans are demanding transparency, not narratives.
#CharlieKirk #PoliticalViolence #GoRight #FBI #Discord #CandaceOwens #Leadership #TruthMatters #ConstitutionalRepublic #GoRightNews
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/goright-with-peter-boykin-gorightnews-com--3096608/support.
📰 Read More About Peter Boykin:
📖 Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Boykin
📖 https://PeterBoykin.com
📢 LISTEN & WATCH:
🎧 Podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/show/goright-with-peter-boykin
📺 Rumble Videos: https://rumble.com/GoRightNews
📺YouTube Videos: http://youtube.com/@PeterBoykinForAmerica
📘 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GoRightNewsOfficial
🌐 Visit the Hub — Home of #GoRightNews: https://GoRightNews.com
💬 Follow Peter Boykin:
🔵 Telegram: https://t.me/RealPeterBoykin
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Hey, folks, this is Peter Boyke and this is hashtag
go right with Peter Boyk, and I'm testing out a
new format doing this live, and uh I do it
as you should know if you pay attention. I do
an article at least once a day, if not multiple articles.
I do a lot of things doing with opinions, and
(00:23):
I try to get different angles. I know, while everybody
else goes live right immediately and says, hey there's news,
I gotta go live. I don't know all the details,
but I need to go live because I need to
be first and I need to get the advertisement out
there and everything like that. I take a little time.
Normally what I do with these is I record them,
(00:45):
I put them out there. Still might do this with
this video. But I usually start with facts first and
didn't do the commentary. But I'm going to start with
the commentary today. So this is basically about the article
I just put out that is called who ordered the
hit on Charlie Kirk loan gunman and orchestrated political hit?
(01:07):
So we're gonna start with the commentary. This is the
hashtag go right with Peter Boykin commentary, Question everything or
lose the Republic, and you can check this out on
go rightnews dot com. So, friends, patriots and citizens who
still believe truth matters, lend me your attention. We live
in a dangerous times for truth. A public figure is dead,
(01:31):
a single name has been handed to us as the answer.
We are told to accept closure. We are told to nod,
to move on, and to trust that the institutions charged
with protecting us had done their job. But ask yourselves this,
(01:52):
When a story it's huge, lands in our laps with
so many blanks, do we really have any obligation to
accept it without question? Or do we have a duty
to ask loudly and repeatedly every unsettling question that the authorities,
(02:15):
platforms and pundits try to sweep away. Fortunately for a
lot of us, we watched the video of Charlie Kirk
being assassinated, wondering if it was ai, wondering if it
was real, over and over again before we realized, yes,
it's apparently we're real. And then a lot of us said,
oh my god, and that image is stuck in your head.
(02:37):
It is nine to eleven. It is nine to eleven.
It's the twin towers following it is seeing something in
the brink of a moment, life than death. For some,
it's fascinating. We have to do it, we have to watch,
we have to analyze, and it's unfortunate. Go Great News
(03:01):
is here to do the hard thing. We asked the questions.
Other outlets shrink from asking because the most doublem are
you know, they're paid for, They're not independent. They worry
about what they're going to say. We asked us questions
not for sport or to stir the pod, even though
(03:21):
some people try to say that, but because democracy are
republic demands on the relentless examination of power, that is
citizen journalism. That is why independent voices exist. So let
us ask who identified the suspect, who did the investigators
(03:46):
get from zero to a day? And what was the
chain of evidence? There are raw affid davids, the surveillance footage,
the forensic report, the discord server logs, and the chain
of custody records for the rifle and the DNA matches.
(04:09):
Are those documents being redacted delayed? Are quietly filtered through
prosecutors and pr teams? And if so, why why did
a technologically technological platform at first seem to deny evidence
and then provided when discord. Are any social platform flips
(04:34):
like that, it's not a trivial error. It is a
crack in the public record. Platforms decide what is allowed,
what is amplified, and sometimes what is hidden. If they
cannot account for fundamental messages and a murder investigation, they
(04:54):
owe us a full accounting as timestamps, the account media data,
the IP history, the preservation logs. Anything less than half true,
it breeds rumor. And if you read the logs, I'm
sorry you read the logs, and I'm pulling it up
(05:15):
right now, and you're supposed to read this the text.
Read the text message between Charlie Kirk's expecting roommate and
it's the man accusing Charlie Kirk, and it's the unmain roommate.
And then you're supposed to read this romantic relationship that
they keep saying that they're gay and the roommate is trans.
But yet there's no evidence, absolutely no evidence. And if
(05:38):
there was, there was, if it is, it is, but
there's no evidence other than what people keep spreading. And
then the Washington Post says it, and the Washington Post
restricts it. The full record of text messages is like Robinson, trump,
what you're doing. Look under my keyboard. I had the
opportunity to take Charlie, and I'm going to take it out,
(05:58):
take them out. He says, what you're joking, right, Oh,
I am still okay, my love, but I am strucking
for an orum for a little while longer. Shouldn't we
belong till we come out? And we got to grab
my rifle? Still, to be honest, I had hoped to
keep the secret till I died of old age. And
I'm sorry to involve you. And roommate says, you weren't
(06:19):
the only one. You weren't the only one that did it.
And Robin said, oh, I'm sorry. I thought they caught
the person. Oh no, they grabbed some crazy old dude
and the intergrenaded someone in similar clothing. And I had
planned to grab my rifle a drop point. And you know,
the conversation goes on and on with this, and it's
so convenient that everything that they need with said supposedly
(06:40):
in this conversation. Anybody uses online knows that this is
not a real conversation. To me, it sounds like a
bunch of hogwash. But it'll be up to discord to
prove it. Now, why have we heard so little directly
from the cues? Maybe the lawyers are really good. Where
(07:03):
is the recorded statement? Why are they seeing informant retactions
or resuscitations rather than primary testimony? Are there other persons
of interest who were centered and this dismissed? I mean
we're at the fourth forthipsis suspect pretty much, folks, in
(07:24):
a country that values due process, I mean, I hate
to say it, but we are still a country that
has practically or almost are have, and of people arguing
they that haven't supported people who are legal citizens without
due process. Mistakes happen, Things happen, And a country that
(07:47):
values due process, every step of that investigation belongs to
the public, not only to the prosecutors. And this is
going to have to go to the court of law.
Let us also asked the hard political questions without failing
into the trap of blaming entire communities. Powerful people and
(08:10):
networks exist. Influence is real, lobbyist, financial leaders, global institutions,
and they tug, they push, and they've been politics every day.
If a rising voice like Charlie Kirk was shifting from
(08:33):
one fashion to another, or if he was set to
become a national player who benefited from his silence. Benefits
not guilt. But motive is not proof. But motive is
why we ask ask about history. America has a thread
(08:54):
of political killings stone through its modern memory. Leaders who
pushed movements, who challenged entrenched power, who rattled the cages
of the uncomfortable are the comfortable Abraham Lincoln, MLK jor
Malcolm X the Kennedys. Each case is its own tragedy
(09:20):
and its own gauntlet of unresolved questions. That history means
two things. First, we must be vigilant when leaders are attacked. Second,
we must refuse to trade vigilance for paranoia. There is
a difference between demanding documentation and inventing malivedant conspiracies. We
(09:45):
pursue facts, we do not manufacture villains. And yet, let
us not forget the role of technology in amplifying doubt.
In a world of deep fakes, gender, no text, and
manufactured screenshots, every quote leak must be authenticated. We cannot
(10:05):
accept screenshots as gospel. We must demand server logs that
show presevenance and providence. We must insist on metadata and
original files, not JPEGs pass through a thousand DM chains.
If we fail to insist on providence, we will drown
(10:28):
in a sea of fabricated evidence. It looks real enough
to convince the gullible and the silence the skeptical, especially
if we're talking about possibly jury trials, trials. That's the
day and age we're living, folks. Some will call this
questioning dangerous. Some will say it feeds the conspiracies. I
(10:50):
say the opposite. Not asking questions is what kills trust.
Not demanding transparency is how narratives calcify and be unchallenged orphodoxity.
If institutions are confident in their case, they should welcome scrutiny.
(11:11):
Let the documents be public, Let the transcripts be released.
Let independent councils or a special prosecutor look at the
records under oath and on camera. If the cases are
air tight, openness will destroy rumor. If it is not
air tight, openness will expose errors and make reform possible.
(11:37):
So to the readers and the listeners, do not surrender
your curiosity to headlines. Read follow the source documents. If
a newsclip cites a FBI source, ask for the filing.
If a screenshot is presented, ask for the server logs
if a platform delivers a statement asked for the internal timeline.
(12:04):
Journalism is not opinion. Journalism is the collection and verification
of facts. Opinion has its place, but we must wear
a clearly labeled coat. Too many people's spout half truths
because they did not bother to read a court filing
or a timeline. That is our cultural problem, and it
(12:28):
is fixable. And folks, I have my ideas, I have
my opinions of ideas, but I never think of anything
as fact until I finally get the information to those
(12:53):
in power. Transparency is not weakness. It is only legitimate armor.
You can use the offense suspicion, release the filings, release
the rejected lugs if you must, but show us the chain,
Allow independent investigators, allow the press to see what you have,
(13:15):
under supervision if necessary. The alternative is worse silence, which
breeds rumor, which breeds violence, which weakens the republic. So
we go read news. We keep asking if we have
to do the Freedom of Information Act, well we can.
Freedom of action will demand oversight committees to hold public hearings.
(13:39):
We will push for platforms to disclose timelines. We will
never refuse hunger for the truth with a ReSpectacle. We
will call out lazy narratives on the left and on
the right, and we will not give weight to scapegoating.
We will not tolerate hatred masks as analysis, and we
(14:02):
will above all insist that every claim be tied to
evidence that everyone can inspect. If asking these questions makes
us targets, so be it. We will accept the heat
of scrutiny. We will accept these slings and arrows of
mockery because a republic worth defending requires citizens willing to
(14:23):
pry open closed rooms and demand air journalism, real journalism,
citizen journalism, opinion grounded at evidence is the firewall between
chaos and the rule of law.
Speaker 2 (14:36):
So ask us, demand the documents, Ask with us, demand
the documents, push for independent oversight, read the violence, don't
trust the found bite, question everything, because that's the only
way to honor the dead and the republic.
Speaker 1 (14:55):
Go write news. Will be watching, will you. I'll tune
back on later with the meat of this episode and
this article again. You can check the whole article out
at goretnews dot com. We'll be back
Hey, folks, this is Peter Boyke and this is hashtag
go right with Peter Boyk, and I'm testing out a
new format doing this live, and uh I do it
as you should know if you pay attention. I do
an article at least once a day, if not multiple articles.
I do a lot of things doing with opinions, and
(00:23):
I try to get different angles. I know, while everybody
else goes live right immediately and says, hey there's news,
I gotta go live. I don't know all the details,
but I need to go live because I need to
be first and I need to get the advertisement out
there and everything like that. I take a little time.
Normally what I do with these is I record them,
(00:45):
I put them out there. Still might do this with
this video. But I usually start with facts first and
didn't do the commentary. But I'm going to start with
the commentary today. So this is basically about the article
I just put out that is called who ordered the
hit on Charlie Kirk loan gunman and orchestrated political hit?
(01:07):
So we're gonna start with the commentary. This is the
hashtag go right with Peter Boykin commentary, Question everything or
lose the Republic, and you can check this out on
go rightnews dot com. So, friends, patriots and citizens who
still believe truth matters, lend me your attention. We live
in a dangerous times for truth. A public figure is dead,
(01:31):
a single name has been handed to us as the answer.
We are told to accept closure. We are told to nod,
to move on, and to trust that the institutions charged
with protecting us had done their job. But ask yourselves this,
(01:52):
When a story it's huge, lands in our laps with
so many blanks, do we really have any obligation to
accept it without question? Or do we have a duty
to ask loudly and repeatedly every unsettling question that the authorities,
(02:15):
platforms and pundits try to sweep away. Fortunately for a
lot of us, we watched the video of Charlie Kirk
being assassinated, wondering if it was ai, wondering if it
was real, over and over again before we realized, yes,
it's apparently we're real. And then a lot of us said,
oh my god, and that image is stuck in your head.
(02:37):
It is nine to eleven. It is nine to eleven.
It's the twin towers following it is seeing something in
the brink of a moment, life than death. For some,
it's fascinating. We have to do it, we have to watch,
we have to analyze, and it's unfortunate. Go Great News
(03:01):
is here to do the hard thing. We asked the questions.
Other outlets shrink from asking because the most doublem are
you know, they're paid for, They're not independent. They worry
about what they're going to say. We asked us questions
not for sport or to stir the pod, even though
(03:21):
some people try to say that, but because democracy are
republic demands on the relentless examination of power, that is
citizen journalism. That is why independent voices exist. So let
us ask who identified the suspect, who did the investigators
(03:46):
get from zero to a day? And what was the
chain of evidence? There are raw affid davids, the surveillance footage,
the forensic report, the discord server logs, and the chain
of custody records for the rifle and the DNA matches.
(04:09):
Are those documents being redacted delayed? Are quietly filtered through
prosecutors and pr teams? And if so, why why did
a technologically technological platform at first seem to deny evidence
and then provided when discord. Are any social platform flips
(04:34):
like that, it's not a trivial error. It is a
crack in the public record. Platforms decide what is allowed,
what is amplified, and sometimes what is hidden. If they
cannot account for fundamental messages and a murder investigation, they
(04:54):
owe us a full accounting as timestamps, the account media data,
the IP history, the preservation logs. Anything less than half true,
it breeds rumor. And if you read the logs, I'm
sorry you read the logs, and I'm pulling it up
(05:15):
right now, and you're supposed to read this the text.
Read the text message between Charlie Kirk's expecting roommate and
it's the man accusing Charlie Kirk, and it's the unmain roommate.
And then you're supposed to read this romantic relationship that
they keep saying that they're gay and the roommate is trans.
But yet there's no evidence, absolutely no evidence. And if
(05:38):
there was, there was, if it is, it is, but
there's no evidence other than what people keep spreading. And
then the Washington Post says it, and the Washington Post
restricts it. The full record of text messages is like Robinson, trump,
what you're doing. Look under my keyboard. I had the
opportunity to take Charlie, and I'm going to take it out,
(05:58):
take them out. He says, what you're joking, right, Oh,
I am still okay, my love, but I am strucking
for an orum for a little while longer. Shouldn't we
belong till we come out? And we got to grab
my rifle? Still, to be honest, I had hoped to
keep the secret till I died of old age. And
I'm sorry to involve you. And roommate says, you weren't
(06:19):
the only one. You weren't the only one that did it.
And Robin said, oh, I'm sorry. I thought they caught
the person. Oh no, they grabbed some crazy old dude
and the intergrenaded someone in similar clothing. And I had
planned to grab my rifle a drop point. And you know,
the conversation goes on and on with this, and it's
so convenient that everything that they need with said supposedly
(06:40):
in this conversation. Anybody uses online knows that this is
not a real conversation. To me, it sounds like a
bunch of hogwash. But it'll be up to discord to
prove it. Now, why have we heard so little directly
from the cues? Maybe the lawyers are really good. Where
(07:03):
is the recorded statement? Why are they seeing informant retactions
or resuscitations rather than primary testimony? Are there other persons
of interest who were centered and this dismissed? I mean
we're at the fourth forthipsis suspect pretty much, folks, in
(07:24):
a country that values due process, I mean, I hate
to say it, but we are still a country that
has practically or almost are have, and of people arguing
they that haven't supported people who are legal citizens without
due process. Mistakes happen, Things happen, And a country that
(07:47):
values due process, every step of that investigation belongs to
the public, not only to the prosecutors. And this is
going to have to go to the court of law.
Let us also asked the hard political questions without failing
into the trap of blaming entire communities. Powerful people and
(08:10):
networks exist. Influence is real, lobbyist, financial leaders, global institutions,
and they tug, they push, and they've been politics every day.
If a rising voice like Charlie Kirk was shifting from
(08:33):
one fashion to another, or if he was set to
become a national player who benefited from his silence. Benefits
not guilt. But motive is not proof. But motive is
why we ask ask about history. America has a thread
(08:54):
of political killings stone through its modern memory. Leaders who
pushed movements, who challenged entrenched power, who rattled the cages
of the uncomfortable are the comfortable Abraham Lincoln, MLK jor
Malcolm X the Kennedys. Each case is its own tragedy
(09:20):
and its own gauntlet of unresolved questions. That history means
two things. First, we must be vigilant when leaders are attacked. Second,
we must refuse to trade vigilance for paranoia. There is
a difference between demanding documentation and inventing malivedant conspiracies. We
(09:45):
pursue facts, we do not manufacture villains. And yet, let
us not forget the role of technology in amplifying doubt.
In a world of deep fakes, gender, no text, and
manufactured screenshots, every quote leak must be authenticated. We cannot
(10:05):
accept screenshots as gospel. We must demand server logs that
show presevenance and providence. We must insist on metadata and
original files, not JPEGs pass through a thousand DM chains.
If we fail to insist on providence, we will drown
(10:28):
in a sea of fabricated evidence. It looks real enough
to convince the gullible and the silence the skeptical, especially
if we're talking about possibly jury trials, trials. That's the
day and age we're living, folks. Some will call this
questioning dangerous. Some will say it feeds the conspiracies. I
(10:50):
say the opposite. Not asking questions is what kills trust.
Not demanding transparency is how narratives calcify and be unchallenged orphodoxity.
If institutions are confident in their case, they should welcome scrutiny.
(11:11):
Let the documents be public, Let the transcripts be released.
Let independent councils or a special prosecutor look at the
records under oath and on camera. If the cases are
air tight, openness will destroy rumor. If it is not
air tight, openness will expose errors and make reform possible.
(11:37):
So to the readers and the listeners, do not surrender
your curiosity to headlines. Read follow the source documents. If
a newsclip cites a FBI source, ask for the filing.
If a screenshot is presented, ask for the server logs
if a platform delivers a statement asked for the internal timeline.
(12:04):
Journalism is not opinion. Journalism is the collection and verification
of facts. Opinion has its place, but we must wear
a clearly labeled coat. Too many people's spout half truths
because they did not bother to read a court filing
or a timeline. That is our cultural problem, and it
(12:28):
is fixable. And folks, I have my ideas, I have
my opinions of ideas, but I never think of anything
as fact until I finally get the information to those
(12:53):
in power. Transparency is not weakness. It is only legitimate armor.
You can use the offense suspicion, release the filings, release
the rejected lugs if you must, but show us the chain,
Allow independent investigators, allow the press to see what you have,
(13:15):
under supervision if necessary. The alternative is worse silence, which
breeds rumor, which breeds violence, which weakens the republic. So
we go read news. We keep asking if we have
to do the Freedom of Information Act, well we can.
Freedom of action will demand oversight committees to hold public hearings.
(13:39):
We will push for platforms to disclose timelines. We will
never refuse hunger for the truth with a ReSpectacle. We
will call out lazy narratives on the left and on
the right, and we will not give weight to scapegoating.
We will not tolerate hatred masks as analysis, and we
(14:02):
will above all insist that every claim be tied to
evidence that everyone can inspect. If asking these questions makes
us targets, so be it. We will accept the heat
of scrutiny. We will accept these slings and arrows of
mockery because a republic worth defending requires citizens willing to
(14:23):
pry open closed rooms and demand air journalism, real journalism,
citizen journalism, opinion grounded at evidence is the firewall between
chaos and the rule of law.
Speaker 2 (14:36):
So ask us, demand the documents, Ask with us, demand
the documents, push for independent oversight, read the violence, don't
trust the found bite, question everything, because that's the only
way to honor the dead and the republic.
Speaker 1 (14:55):
Go write news. Will be watching, will you. I'll tune
back on later with the meat of this episode and
this article again. You can check the whole article out
at goretnews dot com. We'll be back
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.