August 1, 2025 • 39 mins
Seg 1 – The Epstein Fallout
Seg 2 – The New 2026 Narrative Drops
Seg 3 – Illegal Immigration Gets a Coastal Makeover
Seg 4 – Western Globalism Heads East
Seg 2 – The New 2026 Narrative Drops
Seg 3 – Illegal Immigration Gets a Coastal Makeover
Seg 4 – Western Globalism Heads East
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
The views and opinions expressed on the following program are
those of the host and guests and do not necessarily
represent those of any organization, including one generation away.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Yeh, that's what was free.
Speaker 3 (00:11):
Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of enterprise, and
freedom is special and way.
Speaker 1 (00:17):
This is Liberty Nation with Markangeldes, a production of Libertynation
dot Com, going after what the politicians really mean and
making it all clear for your freedom and your liberty.
Liberty Nation with Markangeledes.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
Hello, welcome to Liberty Nation Radio, head coast to coast
on the Radio American Network. I'm your host, Mark Angelidis.
On today's special show, we are talking the Epstein Files,
illegal immigration, and a whole lot more. It's going to
be quite the show. Please remember liliutin Nation Radio sponsored
by Liberty Nation dot com. You can access podcast, breaking
news analysis and arrange of fighting and brediant shows to
what your apetite for freedom and your fundus for the
(00:55):
great American Constitution. And you're on Liberty Nation Radio with
your Mark Anthony's. We're joined by Liberty Nations chief political
correspondent and satirist mister Graham J. Noble. Thanks for joining us, Graham.
Speaker 4 (01:08):
Thank you, Mark. Pleasure to be here.
Speaker 2 (01:10):
So, Graham, the big hullabaloo that's been dogging the Trump
administration for the last it's a good few weeks now
is the Epstein saga, the Jeffrey Epstein saga. And it
seems to me, and i'd like, you're announced on this
because you've written, You've covered this whole saga on the
(01:31):
pages of Liberty Nation dot com so thoroughly that it
seems to me that there's no external information. I mean,
there could be coming out, of course, but it really
encapsulates everything that's taking place. My conclusion from that is
that this is a a media generated quote, We've got
(01:52):
Trump this time story end quote. Graham, what's your take?
Speaker 3 (01:59):
Well, I do think the Trump administration kind of, you know,
fumbled this one a little bit, because, after all, you know,
during the election last year, during the election campaign and
also even in the early days of this administration, that
the American people were given the impression that this was
(02:20):
this whole Epstein thing was going to get blown wide open,
that you know, we were going to see the famous
fabled client list, and you know, we were going to
see all the documents, and we were going to know
who was involved. And then all of a sudden, you know,
kind of first of all, they come out and say, well,
you know, this whole conspiracy about Jeffrey Epstein, you know,
(02:42):
not you know, not committing suicide. Yeah, that's that's nonsense.
He did commit suicide, apparently, But which is what they're saying.
I personally am still not convinced, and I'm sure a
lot of people aren't either. But then, you know, and
then Pambondi is pretty much comes out and says, well, oh, yeah,
those files I.
Speaker 4 (03:01):
Said I had on my desk, What files were they?
Speaker 2 (03:05):
Again?
Speaker 3 (03:07):
You know, and I'm sure you know, that must have
upset a lot of you know, a lot of people
in MAGA worlds would have been very upset about that,
because all of a sudden it's a big disappointment. But
apparently the poles don't reflect any major you know. It's
not like Trump supporters are suddenly just you know, throwing
(03:28):
in the towel and saying that's it.
Speaker 2 (03:29):
I'm done.
Speaker 4 (03:30):
I'm done with Trump because of the Epstein thing.
Speaker 2 (03:32):
So it's funny. It's funny that you say that because
there is a pervasive story within the more left leaning
for the State that Maga world is abandoning Trump because
he led them on this wild goose chase regarding Epstein.
But then Harry Enton of CNN pointed out, based in
(03:53):
one of their pollings that it wasn't They did like,
what's your top issue with Donald Trump? And one respondent
in the entire poll said the Epstein stuff was. And
that's not one percent, as Entin, it was one person one.
So I don't feel this is going to sing Donald Trump.
(04:14):
But it does seem that it was a misstep that
was so easily avoidable, and they tried to and this
is just opinion, of course, but it seems the Trump administration,
including the President, tried to p T Barnum this this
whole thing, and they thought they could deliver such something groundbreaking,
(04:36):
and maybe it's just not the case, and they've kind
of let everybody down with it. Now. Fortunately, Trump's been
keeping the let's say, the news industry afloat with a
lot of other things that are our key for his supporters.
But it really was a rare misstep, there wasn't it
(04:57):
It was it was so out of character to be
so off messaging and sort of dismissive of his base.
It kind of surprised me in that.
Speaker 4 (05:07):
Yeah, I think it was. It was really bad.
Speaker 3 (05:09):
And yeah, and as you alluded to, Trump's own response
to all of this, was was actually shocking, I thought,
I mean, you know, I think at one point even said, look,
you know, if the people who were concerned about Epstein,
you know, I don't want those people as my supporters have.
Speaker 2 (05:27):
Really, I mean, that was almost a Clinton esque mistake, almost.
Speaker 3 (05:32):
Was it was that was yeah, it was really it
was really bad. It was I don't know what he
was thinking when he said that. And true, you know,
I mean, look, the Epstein thing isn't the biggest issue
we've got going on in America today, not not by
a long shot. But nevertheless, this was a case of
being you know, that the Trump supporters were, you know,
(05:55):
basically Trump. Trump's team over promised and under delivered in
a massive way, and I think it was really kind
of shot themselves in the foot. I mean, you know,
of course, now the situation is that they've tried to
backtrack it a bit. They've tried to do damage control
by actually requesting that grand jury testimony is unsealed, and
(06:17):
in fact, an Obama appointed judge in Florida is the
one who can't do that, not unseeing it, which makes
you wonder, you know that the left loves to think
that somehow, you know, Trump is all intricately kind of
tied into the whole Epstein Zex crime thing, which, of course,
(06:39):
if he was, that stuff would have been out in
the media years ago. That's what If he was, why
didn't Obama appointed judge then not want to unseal this
information if it were so damaged and Trump?
Speaker 2 (06:51):
That's the thing that's so often overlooked during Trump out
of office, so January nineteen, twenty twenty one, sorry, until
he was back in office January twenty twenty twenty five.
In all that time, pretty much every law enforcement agency
(07:14):
you could shake a stick at was filing something against
Donald Trump. I mean, he's been dragged through federal courts,
through regional courts. He's had felonies attached to his name
thirty four I believe at the last count, and everybody
was gunning for Donald Trump. And there was and I'm
(07:37):
almost certain the evidence is going to come out on
this that there was at least limited coordination and communication
between the federal government and regional like Manhattan prosecutors, because
there were visits to the White House. I mean, that's
on the record. We don't know what was said at
those but you know, they leave the White House and
then all of a sudden they launched a case against
(07:57):
Donald Trump. So I'm sure something will come out of
that about that, or maybe not, who knows. It probably
disappears on Pambondi's desk. But there's this whole movement to
take down Donald Trump in the four years he's out
of office, and nobody thought, we've got all these Epstein files,
(08:18):
let's just leak. It's it's unthinkable that such a thing
didn't happen. If they were, they would be in any
way tangentially damaging to Donald J. Trump. I'll give you
the final word on this gram. Where do you think
this is going from now onwards?
Speaker 3 (08:38):
I I you know, you know what surprises me about it,
And I think the one thing that everyone really should
be it's a shame that's just become politicized because if
the allegations against Epstein and Justlain Maxwell, who's still sitting
in the federal prison despite apparently having trafficked underage, go
(09:00):
to newbody, and that's.
Speaker 2 (09:03):
Except Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 3 (09:05):
Yeah, and I think that's the big thing that we
lose sight of, is that is that what we should
really be wanting to know is who other than Epstein
was involved in taking advantage of, abusing or whatever these
underage females. And that's the that's the tragedy of the story.
(09:28):
It's not whether Trump was involved, or whether Bill Clinton
was involved or who else. That's the politics of it
are irrelevant. We're talking about victims here of sex trafficking,
but apparently other than Jeffrey Epstein himself, nobody else was
involved at all, allegedly, And I think, so where does
it go from here? Well, this is going to be
(09:50):
the subject of various conspiracy theories for four years to
come yet, But I don't think we're actually ever going
to maybe not get any more answers or not for
several years until eventually this information probably will be unsealed
and released to the public, and by then it may
have been sanitized so much that you know, even then
(10:12):
nothing will come out of it.
Speaker 2 (10:13):
Well, is it? Back to P. T. Barnum, He said,
advertising is to a genuine article what manure is to land.
It largely increases the overall product. Graham, We're going to
be back with Graham after this short break.
Speaker 4 (10:28):
Don't go anywhere.
Speaker 1 (10:37):
For your freedom and your liberty. Liberty Nation with Mark
Edge of Ladies.
Speaker 2 (10:43):
And you're back on libitin Nation, Radio Head Coast to
Coast and the Radio America Network. I remain your host,
Mark Anjedy's we'll continuing our conversation with the limitin Nations
Chief political Correspondent Instagram, Jay Noble, thanks for sticking around Graham. Now,
you produced a fascinating, fascinating piece on the page infination
dot Com that as soon as I read it, I thought, well,
(11:05):
of course they are. It's the it's an obvious headslap
moment after the fact, and that is that there is
a narrative forming around potential twenty twenty six mid term results.
Graham put us in.
Speaker 3 (11:23):
Yeah, well, this one is a kind of the narrative
du jour in the media, or was anyway for a
little while. And the backstory here, of course, is we've
got midterm elections coming up next year. Now, generally speaking,
almost always, in fact, the party in power, in words,
(11:45):
the party that has control of the White House usually
loses in the midterms, you know, lose a whole bunch
of seats. It's particularly in a president's first term. Well
kind of with Donald Trump, it's kind of weird, like
the first term. Yeah, yeah, it's his second first term.
(12:08):
It's kind of strange. So so who knows if president holds.
But even actually in presidents I looked back over the
over the numbers and over the midterm results for the
last multiple election titles, and actually, even in a president
second term, usually his party will will lose kind of
will will come up as the losers in the midterms,
(12:29):
and there's only a couple of There's only been a
couple of exceptions to that.
Speaker 4 (12:34):
I think George W. Bush, I think.
Speaker 3 (12:39):
I think Bill Clinton as well was an exception in
his first term, I believe. But but so anyway, that's
that's the backstory, is that you would think, you know,
kind of history tells us that the Democrats are going
to pick up a lot of seats in the midterms
and Republicans are going to lose a lot of seats.
But the way things are going, i mean, Democrats just
(13:01):
their approval ratings are just in the tank right now.
Speaker 2 (13:05):
I've just expanded that historic lows in pretty much every
poll over the last for each of these polling companies,
they go back about thirty to forty years. They're polling
on their historic lows and all of them.
Speaker 3 (13:17):
Yeah, and so so here's the question we could actually
be looking at, you know, unless things that change changed
quite a bit within the next you know, ten twelve months,
we could be looking at a I hate using the
word unprecedented, it's not quite accurate, but we could be
(13:40):
looking at an uncommon shellacking at the polls for the
Democrats next year. And I think they're already trying to
think about, well, how do we how do we mitigate that,
you know, in the kind of the in the publics,
in the public eye, how do we already kind of
make the optics look not as bad for us? And
so now they've come up with this all of a sudden,
(14:03):
And that's why the reason why my title to my
article you're talking about began with the words got the memo,
because as so often as the case, it suddenly seems
that all the media outlets, all the leftlandy media outlets
are reporting the same story in the same way. And
in this case, the message was and I'm not sure
(14:24):
how they think he's going to do this, but the
message essentially was Trump and the Republicans are going to
rig the midterm elections.
Speaker 4 (14:33):
They're going to rig it.
Speaker 3 (14:34):
Now I'm not Initially I said, I don't know quite
the mechanics of how they would do that, but apparently,
and also apparently it's no longer it's no longer shocking.
Speaker 2 (14:45):
Apparently to.
Speaker 4 (14:48):
Suggest that an election might get rigged.
Speaker 2 (14:52):
Yes, yeah, that was enough to get you canceled back
in late twenty twenty one, sorry, early twenty twenty one.
But yes, so there is that there's so much charter
going around that Donald Trump's trying to fix the election.
Part of that seems to be the accusations of major
taking place as if as if the Republicans are the
(15:16):
only party that have ever tried to to make a
seats safer for their core voters, right yeah, And of
course Gavin Knews some saying, well, if you know, if
Trump and the Republicans Jerry manned the Texas, we're gonna
we're just gonna do it everywhere. You've already been doing
it everywhere, you know, all.
Speaker 3 (15:37):
They well that's the thing, Mark, you know, see that
is that that is the key right there, the way
you what.
Speaker 4 (15:43):
You just said, because the Democrats.
Speaker 3 (15:46):
The reason, whether it's say and right now, the only
place Republicans are redistricting, and if you want to call
it jerry mandering, that depends on your point of view.
But where the Republicans are redistricting is in Texas. I mean,
it's not like they're doing it in every one of
the red states. But the thing is the Democrats they've already, like,
(16:07):
you know, states like Michigan.
Speaker 4 (16:10):
Have been already jerry mannered to the extreme.
Speaker 3 (16:14):
I mean, it's you know, we're at the point where
in some certain blue states it's pretty much impossible for
a Republican to win a seat in any congressional district
in some of these in some of these states because
they've already been jerry handed to the to the nth degree,
you know. So that and that's why I think the
(16:36):
Democrats are panicking because they're looking at Republicans doing some
redistrict in and then they're thinking, well, how can we
fight mac But they've already they've already done all they
can do. It's like, how do you how do you
redistrict anymore? It's like it's like you've cut the You've
cut the cake into into so many little slices.
Speaker 4 (16:55):
Now you can't cut it anymore.
Speaker 2 (16:57):
Drums crumbs is Nancy Pelosi might say about about anything really,
except of course that's her trading bankbook. So yeah, you've
got this basive idea being pushed by a lot in
the media. Also, some elected officials are talking about how
that's some bit big name ones as well. But the
(17:20):
fact is, if all of this redistricting or jerry mandery
goes ahead and and Democrats still win, I mean, what
has the narrative become Is we were so successfully overcame
the cheating that took place. Is that is that the
new narrative? And is there anybody in the country idiotic
(17:43):
enough to buy that as a particular story.
Speaker 4 (17:47):
Yeah. I think the way that the way a lot
of the left wing media operates, they are so blatantly.
Speaker 2 (17:56):
Willing to.
Speaker 3 (17:58):
Just completely dis regard what they were saying, you know,
a year ago, in order to say the opposite thing
today because it suits them.
Speaker 4 (18:06):
And I think, what's your scene?
Speaker 2 (18:08):
Mark?
Speaker 4 (18:09):
My view is that because of course you can't do that.
Speaker 3 (18:11):
You can't make all this hype about, oh, the Republicans
are going to rig the midterms, and then if the
Democrats actually pick up more.
Speaker 2 (18:18):
Seats than the Republicans.
Speaker 3 (18:20):
Yeah, exactly what do they say, Oh, they're stumped and
what But what the media will do is the media
will say, oh, we never, we simply never. We never
suggested that the Republicans were going to with the big terms.
Speaker 4 (18:33):
What are you talking about?
Speaker 2 (18:34):
You know, it's we've always been at war with East
Asia and don't let your your lying eyes tell you otherwise.
But yes, we will see what happens. And please do
go and read Graham's ar till on the pagers of
otnation dot com. It's fantastic, Graham Genoble, thanks for joining us.
Speaker 4 (18:51):
Thank you, Marx pleasure.
Speaker 2 (19:00):
You know that's what was free.
Speaker 4 (19:01):
Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of enterprise, and
freedom is special and rate.
Speaker 1 (19:07):
This is Liberty Nation with Markangeldes, a production of Libertynation
dot com, going after what the politicians really mean and
making it all clear for your freedom and your liberty.
Liberty Nation with Markangeledes.
Speaker 2 (19:24):
And you're back on libitin Nation radio head Coast to
Coast on the Radio America Network, our Manu host Mark
Anthony's We're during conversations with libert Nations Enterprise reporter Joe Schaefer,
who covers so many different beats, many of them with
a globalist bent, which I find one of the most
fascinating topics to cover because it's really masquerading Joe, isn't
(19:47):
it that these globalist ideas are masquerading as mainstream thought
when really they're quite outside the the Overton window. And
I think the one that's really taken root in the
last let's say six or seven years, maybe well longer actually,
to be honest with it, it is illegal immigration. And
(20:08):
while Trump now seems to have the US southern border
under control, I mean he's really got that under control,
it's quite surprising that it's happened without actual legislation having
to be put into place. We are still seeing an
influx of illegal migrants coming in by boat. And the
(20:32):
I've forgotten the name of the agency, it's the US
Naval Institute said that something along the lines of illegal
immigrant interdiction operations. We're in a state of emergency because
people are just coming in by boat and they don't
really know what to do about it because you can't
man every I mean, covering the southern border's tough enough,
(20:55):
but covering the entire coastal regions of the United States.
Is I mean, it's an impossible task, isn't it.
Speaker 5 (21:03):
Yeah, And I've written about that a couple of times. Uh,
Florida in California has had a major problem with this.
In California, they have these panga boats I believe they're called,
and they can just zip right in there and drop
off these legal aliens and they're in the heartland. And
of course under the Bodied administration, they really weren't making
(21:23):
much of an effort to to you know, to help
the state. South Florida would have loved to have cracked
down on it, but they weren't getting any federal help.
Speaker 2 (21:30):
Uh.
Speaker 5 (21:30):
You So Trump has stressed that they're gonna they're going
to step up you know, this in California and Florida.
And you know, again we see California doesn't want to
cooperate at all with the Trump administration. So that's an
interesting battle front. People are talking about Los Angeles and
San Francisco, they should be talking about the coastline, and
they know all these blue you know, because you've got
(21:53):
these blue radicals and these you know, fashionable towns on
the California coast. They're welcoming these boats. It's going to
be another major headache for ICE. You know, we've already
got these protests in the cities, So yeah, it is
a major problem that has kind of gone under the
radar when we're talking about this massive deportation operation.
Speaker 2 (22:15):
Yeah, it's it's almost a backdoor way of facilitating illegal immigration.
Boats turn up like San Diego, and they just get
off the boats, they disappear into the interior the United States.
Who knows who they are, who knows where they're going,
who knows what their intentions are. And because it's not
(22:37):
the kind of places that's really patrolled by anyway, because
you can't due to the sheer size it is, it's
the perfect entry point for people who wish the United
States harm because they know they're not going to encounter
border patrol agents. They know that in certain locales they're
going to get a welcoming blanket and a hot meal
(23:00):
and be on your way, good sir, And then they
wander off and who knows what they're doing. And this
is a particular interest to me because I'm from the
United Kingdom and what we've seen over the last few
years there is just a massive surge of what the
(23:20):
media always terms asylum seekers, even though these are people
that have traveled through numerous safe countries to France, and
France is not at war. There's no good reason to
be fleeing France, I might add. And then they embark
on an admittedly dangerous journey across the Channel in boats
(23:40):
that are often unfit, and they get ashore, they get processed,
they get put up in hotels, they get put up
in houses of multiple occupancy and strange new bill barracks
or things in small towns and villages across the United Kingdom,
and it is really, it is really pushing Britain's to
(24:07):
the brink, made worse by the fact that just this
last week an online Digital Safety Bill came into being,
which was made law by the former Conservative government the
Tory Party, and came into force just this week passed
(24:28):
and it was billed as this will stop children accessing
pornography online. And what it actually did, as we've now seen,
is it means that anybody sharing pictures of, for example,
anti legal immigration protests, all these pictures get blocked out
and you have to verify who you are to look
(24:50):
at the pictures. And at the same time we hear
that the government is setting up I believe the term
is I might have this slightly wrong, but it's the
worse the effect of a crack police unit that will
be looking for anti illegal immigrant sentiment online. And it's
almost as though the UK government doesn't want people complaining
(25:12):
about people breaking laws to get into the United Kingdom.
And it seems to me that the two stories, the
US side and the UK side, they're both linked, they're similar,
and it's for the same reasons.
Speaker 5 (25:27):
It's for that I tried not to smile when you
were talking about a very you know, or welly in
an unpleasant situation, but it's hard not to smile when
you see them using the same playbook over and over again.
They've done it my entire life. I was a child
in the seventies, in nineteen eighties and I saw it.
Then they say, this is for your own good. They
(25:48):
take something hideous like your child pornography, pornography. We have
to protect the kids. The Simpsons did the TV show,
they would make this a running joke, the hysterical woman saying,
won't some any think of the children?
Speaker 2 (26:02):
You use that line.
Speaker 5 (26:03):
And you could do anything. You can absolutely do anything.
So they use that, hey, we got to protect these kids,
come up with this harsh you know, online censorship law,
and now they are going to My understanding is they
have already arrested people for making anti migrant comments on
the internet. That's going on in this supposedly free United
(26:23):
Kingdom right now, and so that the footprint, the way
they got their foot in the tyrannical door is saying
we've got to protect kids from pornography, and then zoom,
they go right for their globalist agenda. They've been doing
it literally my entire life. I'm sure they've been doing
it your entire life in the UK. And you know
they use these cultural you know tools weapons to such
(26:46):
and they've used it to great effect for decades. So
why should they stop. There's no reason for them to stop.
Speaker 2 (26:51):
The the author and known as the Big Conspiracy theorist
very political as well, I might add David Ike he
calls it the totalitarian tiptoe, where they introduce something and
move it several steps further along by using what he
(27:12):
calls a problem reaction solution. So there's a problem, or
there's a problem that's created and then the people say
that people have the reaction, Oh no, won't someone think
of the children, which is the desired reaction, And then
they have a prepackaged solution that just happens to infringe
upon your individual rights. But people are clamoring for it,
(27:34):
and it's a disaster from which there appears to be
no stepping back. I think that's quite a tragic situation
that liberty's wants given away are so rarely returned.
Speaker 5 (27:51):
Yeah, I mean, that's it in a nutshell, and I'm
kind of I didn't get the chop to talk about
it in greater terms. We Rannning Nero the conversation and immigration,
but it.
Speaker 2 (28:01):
Is just a total cultural.
Speaker 5 (28:03):
Weaponization against the citizens of a nation, and we see
it over and over again. I think they know it's
not convincing anybody anymore, which is why you're seeing it
being more harsh, more tyrannical, more out in the open, punitive,
because that's really the only card they have left at
this point is to scare people to threaten number, jail time,
(28:25):
et cetera, et cetera. They've lost the argument on immigration,
in my opinion, in nation after nation, they've lost the argument,
and now it comes can they hold on to their
Fortress because there's no winning on their side anymore. They
just want to keep trying to push something that the
people of these countries do not want.
Speaker 2 (28:46):
We're going to continue this conversation with Joe Schaefer after
this shortbreak.
Speaker 4 (28:49):
Don't go anywhere.
Speaker 1 (28:55):
For your freedom and your liberty. Liberty Nation with more.
Speaker 2 (29:00):
Lees, and you're back on Liberty Nation Radio. We'll continue
our conversation with Liberty Nations Enterprise reporter Joe Shaffer. Thanks
for sticking around, Joe. Now, we touched on this briefly
in the last segment, but I kind of want to
expand on it a bit because there's been and for me,
it's kind of flown under the radar. People have put
out a couple of oh, look at Donald Trump, isn't
(29:22):
he being silly type articles in the left leaning Fourth
Estate discussing at re changing the names of Washington, DC's
sport teams. But it's not. It's not a silly story,
and it's not a silly behavior to try and bring
(29:43):
something back to what it was when it's been destroyed
or changed due to what's the best way to say this, Joe,
an ideology that seeks to pattern itself on top of
everything and say that this is the this is the
dominant thought process, when it's not really the case. It's
(30:03):
a very elitist bubble thought process that's being put over
the top of things.
Speaker 5 (30:13):
There's a lot of ways we can go on this one.
I call it deliberate demoralization. First of all, because if
you notice when they change these sports names, they always
go to the lamest, most bland, dull name possible. That's
not a coincidence. They take a beloved, cherish name. The
Cleveland Indians, as Trump has said, was one of the
original teams, you know, going back to the eighteen nineties,
(30:37):
early nineteen hundreds. Uh, you know, the Washington Redskins, an
iconic NFL franchise, the Redskins, Redskins Cowboys, a great rivalry,
you know, really captures your imagination. And so they want
to dull your imagination. They want to you know, they
want to pound you into blendness. Let's call them the Commanders,
the lamest name we can come up with. Let's change
(30:58):
the Indians to the clean lynd Guardians, which I guess
is named after a bridge or something like the icons
on a bridge. Again appeals to nobody. So that's that's
not a coincidence. They want to dull it down. They
want to they want to demoralize you. But I also
think they realize that this is a very potent weapon
in their arsenal, the cultural arsenal. I just wrote an article.
(31:21):
If this is where you talk about globalism being interesting, fascinating,
the psychological side of it, it's very important to them.
So I wrote an article about populism is on the
rise in Japan now because they're having the same problems
that we're seeing in nation after nation in the West, immigration,
suffering economy, that they're feeling that a corrupt government only
(31:43):
serves itself. Well, as what I wrote up in the
article is that the populist party that is on the
rise specifically pointed out that multinational corporations are feeding globalism,
and so I quoted I quoted the leading crowd company
in Japan. The ceo, who's who was born in India
(32:05):
is all he wants more immigration to Japan, came out
and said we need to hire less Japanese, we need
to hire more foreigners because we just can't have Japanese
employees in our increasingly global cooperation. So he he is
backing up everything the Populist Party said, and again this
(32:25):
is this is like the Dorritos of Japan. I don't
even know if I don't know Japanese culture well enough
if that's but that's how popular they are. They are
like a cultural icon in Japan, and so it's no
mistake that they'll be part of this globalist cartel. You
see it with Dorito's is owned by Fredo l which
is owned by Pepsi. Pepsi was one of the worst
(32:46):
woke companies of the past ten twenty years. You see
it with Guinness in Ireland, you know, which is like
the unofficial official you know, alcoholic beverage of Ireland or
one of them. You know, they're owned by de Jo,
a multinational corporation for years have pushed globalism on Ireland
in the world though the most woke stuff. They are
(33:07):
one of the worst companies and they own just they
own so many companies around the world. So this isn't
a coincidence. You see in Ireland, Japan, America. I'm sure
you can point out examples in England of beloved cultural sports,
entertainment institutions repurposed for the for the globalist propaganda mantras.
Speaker 2 (33:29):
It's it's even worse. In the United Kingdom. We've had
elected politicians in high positions say that they're offended by
seeing the flag of England being flown, and it's it
is demoralizing you right there. There's this concerted effort to
to make people either turn away from symbols that used
(33:55):
to matter or denigrate to the symbols that used to matter.
Because you can't build a new world order if the
old world order is still standing, Joe, it just doesn't work.
You've got to you've got to break down the foundations
of it. Now, let's dive a little deeper into this
(34:18):
what's happening in Japan, because it's it's actually quite fascinating.
Speaker 5 (34:21):
Now.
Speaker 2 (34:21):
We have seen across Western countries, Europe, the United States,
we have seen the rise of populists, and it's it's
quite apparent. It's the it's the growing political ideology of
the day. I think it is a more populous bent
(34:42):
towards politics. But we didn't expect to see that in
somewhere like Japan that you know, from the outside looking in,
it's always been this is a very stayed, a very
conservative monoculture, as it were. But it's true, they are
having the same globalist problems, and it's driven in part
(35:05):
by a multinational corporations that want to see the same affication.
I think I've just made up that word, but I
love it, the same affication of the world. So no
matter where you go, you see the same shops, you
can buy the same pair of shoes, and politicians who
look to globalist enfranchisement as the way of the future.
(35:31):
And I think it was Bertrand Russell who wrote that
socialism is the only way forward, and the only way
to do that is by having a one world government.
And sure a lot of people tried it after Bertrand
Russell wrote about it, and that's what led to one
hundred million deaths. But I don't blame Bertran Russell, of course.
(35:55):
But we see it with politicians. They want things more global.
They're not interested in the now national corporations are the same.
They're one thing's global. They'm not interested in the national.
What do the people want?
Speaker 5 (36:06):
Yeah, I was addressing I can't even pretend to be
an expert on Japan at all. A lot of this
was new to me. But as you said, I've been
writing about globalism for so long, so you.
Speaker 2 (36:16):
Go into it.
Speaker 5 (36:17):
It was literally like going into a new country for me,
already knowing that the playbook the playbook that they were out.
So it's like, Okay, what am I looking for here?
An entrenched, increasingly unpopular government trying to hold on the
power that they've had for decades that they feel slipping away.
And what else am I looking for here? The powerful
corporate interests who want to go global? And I found
(36:40):
them both right away. You know, I could have written
a ten thousand word article on that. You guys don't
like that when I write that. Wait, when I write that, body.
Speaker 2 (36:47):
We prefer them a little shorter, just a little you know.
Speaker 5 (36:50):
I got to hit stop. But there's just so much material.
So let's go with Japan. You talk about a UNI
party and I did not know this at all. The
ruling construct and hip has been in power for sixty
five out of the past sixty nine years. I mean,
that's just insane, that's crazy. And so that came up
with the idea that the Japanese are satisfied with their government. Well,
(37:11):
they were satisfied when they had a booming economy for
decades after World War Two, but that's been gone for
a while now, and they the Japanese people feel that
the economy today, which is going global, which is thinking global,
is not concerned with the Japanese people. And so they
have the same problems that you see in America in Europe,
(37:33):
where prices are rising, the people can't afford it. They
have a demographic crisis, the birth rate crisis. And they've
got politicians these saying politicians that just want to hold
onto power, saying in the corporations saying I've got the solution,
more immigrants, Let's bring more people in. And this people
of the country Japan, Europe, America are saying, what about us,
(37:57):
Why don't we have a government that takes care of
us us? But the first thing they hear from from
their their politicians and their big corporate leaders is we
need to bring in others, you know, others to to feed,
to keep feeding the monolith that they control, but that
the people feel doesn't serve them at all. So why
(38:17):
should they Why should they be invested in this monolith
that they don't care about anymore. And so that's that's
the tension you're seeing it in nation after nation. It's
really not a surprise that it would happen in Japan.
I'm surprised people are so surprised because the entire formula,
all the ingredients that we've seen in Europe and America
(38:39):
are absolutely there in Japan.
Speaker 2 (38:42):
Yeah, it's a it's a it's a cut and paste
form of globalism. Put the things that take it from here,
you can apply it over there. And when you hear
that there's a populist party on their rise, you can
almost guarantee that, all right, let's let's look at the
fact as contributing to it. And as you say, it
always seems to be the problem to all of the
(39:02):
globalist issues. As they say we need more immigration, it's
almost as though that's their driving force. Joe Shaefer, I
want to thank you for coming in talking with us. Audience.
Please do go and check out Joe's writings over at
libertinnation dot com. They are eye opening. Thanks for being here, Joe,
thank you, and that's all we have time for this
week's edition of Liberal Nation radio head Coach Coast on
(39:24):
the Radio American Network. I've been your host, Mark Angela's
I'd like to thank our guests for today, Graham, j
Noble and Joe Shaffer and of course extend my thanks
to you the audience, for tuning in each and every
week here on the Radio American Network. You are appreciated.
Please do remember Liberty Nation does not endorse candidates, campaigns,
or legislation, and this presentation is no endorsement.
The views and opinions expressed on the following program are
those of the host and guests and do not necessarily
represent those of any organization, including one generation away.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Yeh, that's what was free.
Speaker 3 (00:11):
Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of enterprise, and
freedom is special and way.
Speaker 1 (00:17):
This is Liberty Nation with Markangeldes, a production of Libertynation
dot Com, going after what the politicians really mean and
making it all clear for your freedom and your liberty.
Liberty Nation with Markangeledes.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
Hello, welcome to Liberty Nation Radio, head coast to coast
on the Radio American Network. I'm your host, Mark Angelidis.
On today's special show, we are talking the Epstein Files,
illegal immigration, and a whole lot more. It's going to
be quite the show. Please remember liliutin Nation Radio sponsored
by Liberty Nation dot com. You can access podcast, breaking
news analysis and arrange of fighting and brediant shows to
what your apetite for freedom and your fundus for the
(00:55):
great American Constitution. And you're on Liberty Nation Radio with
your Mark Anthony's. We're joined by Liberty Nations chief political
correspondent and satirist mister Graham J. Noble. Thanks for joining us, Graham.
Speaker 4 (01:08):
Thank you, Mark. Pleasure to be here.
Speaker 2 (01:10):
So, Graham, the big hullabaloo that's been dogging the Trump
administration for the last it's a good few weeks now
is the Epstein saga, the Jeffrey Epstein saga. And it
seems to me, and i'd like, you're announced on this
because you've written, You've covered this whole saga on the
(01:31):
pages of Liberty Nation dot com so thoroughly that it
seems to me that there's no external information. I mean,
there could be coming out, of course, but it really
encapsulates everything that's taking place. My conclusion from that is
that this is a a media generated quote, We've got
(01:52):
Trump this time story end quote. Graham, what's your take?
Speaker 3 (01:59):
Well, I do think the Trump administration kind of, you know,
fumbled this one a little bit, because, after all, you know,
during the election last year, during the election campaign and
also even in the early days of this administration, that
the American people were given the impression that this was
(02:20):
this whole Epstein thing was going to get blown wide open,
that you know, we were going to see the famous
fabled client list, and you know, we were going to
see all the documents, and we were going to know
who was involved. And then all of a sudden, you know,
kind of first of all, they come out and say, well,
you know, this whole conspiracy about Jeffrey Epstein, you know,
(02:42):
not you know, not committing suicide. Yeah, that's that's nonsense.
He did commit suicide, apparently, But which is what they're saying.
I personally am still not convinced, and I'm sure a
lot of people aren't either. But then, you know, and
then Pambondi is pretty much comes out and says, well, oh, yeah,
those files I.
Speaker 4 (03:01):
Said I had on my desk, What files were they?
Speaker 2 (03:05):
Again?
Speaker 3 (03:07):
You know, and I'm sure you know, that must have
upset a lot of you know, a lot of people
in MAGA worlds would have been very upset about that,
because all of a sudden it's a big disappointment. But
apparently the poles don't reflect any major you know. It's
not like Trump supporters are suddenly just you know, throwing
(03:28):
in the towel and saying that's it.
Speaker 2 (03:29):
I'm done.
Speaker 4 (03:30):
I'm done with Trump because of the Epstein thing.
Speaker 2 (03:32):
So it's funny. It's funny that you say that because
there is a pervasive story within the more left leaning
for the State that Maga world is abandoning Trump because
he led them on this wild goose chase regarding Epstein.
But then Harry Enton of CNN pointed out, based in
(03:53):
one of their pollings that it wasn't They did like,
what's your top issue with Donald Trump? And one respondent
in the entire poll said the Epstein stuff was. And
that's not one percent, as Entin, it was one person one.
So I don't feel this is going to sing Donald Trump.
(04:14):
But it does seem that it was a misstep that
was so easily avoidable, and they tried to and this
is just opinion, of course, but it seems the Trump administration,
including the President, tried to p T Barnum this this
whole thing, and they thought they could deliver such something groundbreaking,
(04:36):
and maybe it's just not the case, and they've kind
of let everybody down with it. Now. Fortunately, Trump's been
keeping the let's say, the news industry afloat with a
lot of other things that are our key for his supporters.
But it really was a rare misstep, there wasn't it
(04:57):
It was it was so out of character to be
so off messaging and sort of dismissive of his base.
It kind of surprised me in that.
Speaker 4 (05:07):
Yeah, I think it was. It was really bad.
Speaker 3 (05:09):
And yeah, and as you alluded to, Trump's own response
to all of this, was was actually shocking, I thought,
I mean, you know, I think at one point even said, look,
you know, if the people who were concerned about Epstein,
you know, I don't want those people as my supporters have.
Speaker 2 (05:27):
Really, I mean, that was almost a Clinton esque mistake, almost.
Speaker 3 (05:32):
Was it was that was yeah, it was really it
was really bad. It was I don't know what he
was thinking when he said that. And true, you know,
I mean, look, the Epstein thing isn't the biggest issue
we've got going on in America today, not not by
a long shot. But nevertheless, this was a case of
being you know, that the Trump supporters were, you know,
(05:55):
basically Trump. Trump's team over promised and under delivered in
a massive way, and I think it was really kind
of shot themselves in the foot. I mean, you know,
of course, now the situation is that they've tried to
backtrack it a bit. They've tried to do damage control
by actually requesting that grand jury testimony is unsealed, and
(06:17):
in fact, an Obama appointed judge in Florida is the
one who can't do that, not unseeing it, which makes
you wonder, you know that the left loves to think
that somehow, you know, Trump is all intricately kind of
tied into the whole Epstein Zex crime thing, which, of course,
(06:39):
if he was, that stuff would have been out in
the media years ago. That's what If he was, why
didn't Obama appointed judge then not want to unseal this
information if it were so damaged and Trump?
Speaker 2 (06:51):
That's the thing that's so often overlooked during Trump out
of office, so January nineteen, twenty twenty one, sorry, until
he was back in office January twenty twenty twenty five.
In all that time, pretty much every law enforcement agency
(07:14):
you could shake a stick at was filing something against
Donald Trump. I mean, he's been dragged through federal courts,
through regional courts. He's had felonies attached to his name
thirty four I believe at the last count, and everybody
was gunning for Donald Trump. And there was and I'm
(07:37):
almost certain the evidence is going to come out on
this that there was at least limited coordination and communication
between the federal government and regional like Manhattan prosecutors, because
there were visits to the White House. I mean, that's
on the record. We don't know what was said at
those but you know, they leave the White House and
then all of a sudden they launched a case against
(07:57):
Donald Trump. So I'm sure something will come out of
that about that, or maybe not, who knows. It probably
disappears on Pambondi's desk. But there's this whole movement to
take down Donald Trump in the four years he's out
of office, and nobody thought, we've got all these Epstein files,
(08:18):
let's just leak. It's it's unthinkable that such a thing
didn't happen. If they were, they would be in any
way tangentially damaging to Donald J. Trump. I'll give you
the final word on this gram. Where do you think
this is going from now onwards?
Speaker 3 (08:38):
I I you know, you know what surprises me about it,
And I think the one thing that everyone really should
be it's a shame that's just become politicized because if
the allegations against Epstein and Justlain Maxwell, who's still sitting
in the federal prison despite apparently having trafficked underage, go
(09:00):
to newbody, and that's.
Speaker 2 (09:03):
Except Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 3 (09:05):
Yeah, and I think that's the big thing that we
lose sight of, is that is that what we should
really be wanting to know is who other than Epstein
was involved in taking advantage of, abusing or whatever these
underage females. And that's the that's the tragedy of the story.
(09:28):
It's not whether Trump was involved, or whether Bill Clinton
was involved or who else. That's the politics of it
are irrelevant. We're talking about victims here of sex trafficking,
but apparently other than Jeffrey Epstein himself, nobody else was
involved at all, allegedly, And I think, so where does
it go from here? Well, this is going to be
(09:50):
the subject of various conspiracy theories for four years to
come yet, But I don't think we're actually ever going
to maybe not get any more answers or not for
several years until eventually this information probably will be unsealed
and released to the public, and by then it may
have been sanitized so much that you know, even then
(10:12):
nothing will come out of it.
Speaker 2 (10:13):
Well, is it? Back to P. T. Barnum, He said,
advertising is to a genuine article what manure is to land.
It largely increases the overall product. Graham, We're going to
be back with Graham after this short break.
Speaker 4 (10:28):
Don't go anywhere.
Speaker 1 (10:37):
For your freedom and your liberty. Liberty Nation with Mark
Edge of Ladies.
Speaker 2 (10:43):
And you're back on libitin Nation, Radio Head Coast to
Coast and the Radio America Network. I remain your host,
Mark Anjedy's we'll continuing our conversation with the limitin Nations
Chief political Correspondent Instagram, Jay Noble, thanks for sticking around Graham. Now,
you produced a fascinating, fascinating piece on the page infination
dot Com that as soon as I read it, I thought, well,
(11:05):
of course they are. It's the it's an obvious headslap
moment after the fact, and that is that there is
a narrative forming around potential twenty twenty six mid term results.
Graham put us in.
Speaker 3 (11:23):
Yeah, well, this one is a kind of the narrative
du jour in the media, or was anyway for a
little while. And the backstory here, of course, is we've
got midterm elections coming up next year. Now, generally speaking,
almost always, in fact, the party in power, in words,
(11:45):
the party that has control of the White House usually
loses in the midterms, you know, lose a whole bunch
of seats. It's particularly in a president's first term. Well
kind of with Donald Trump, it's kind of weird, like
the first term. Yeah, yeah, it's his second first term.
(12:08):
It's kind of strange. So so who knows if president holds.
But even actually in presidents I looked back over the
over the numbers and over the midterm results for the
last multiple election titles, and actually, even in a president
second term, usually his party will will lose kind of
will will come up as the losers in the midterms,
(12:29):
and there's only a couple of There's only been a
couple of exceptions to that.
Speaker 4 (12:34):
I think George W. Bush, I think.
Speaker 3 (12:39):
I think Bill Clinton as well was an exception in
his first term, I believe. But but so anyway, that's
that's the backstory, is that you would think, you know,
kind of history tells us that the Democrats are going
to pick up a lot of seats in the midterms
and Republicans are going to lose a lot of seats.
But the way things are going, i mean, Democrats just
(13:01):
their approval ratings are just in the tank right now.
Speaker 2 (13:05):
I've just expanded that historic lows in pretty much every
poll over the last for each of these polling companies,
they go back about thirty to forty years. They're polling
on their historic lows and all of them.
Speaker 3 (13:17):
Yeah, and so so here's the question we could actually
be looking at, you know, unless things that change changed
quite a bit within the next you know, ten twelve months,
we could be looking at a I hate using the
word unprecedented, it's not quite accurate, but we could be
(13:40):
looking at an uncommon shellacking at the polls for the
Democrats next year. And I think they're already trying to
think about, well, how do we how do we mitigate that,
you know, in the kind of the in the publics,
in the public eye, how do we already kind of
make the optics look not as bad for us? And
so now they've come up with this all of a sudden,
(14:03):
And that's why the reason why my title to my
article you're talking about began with the words got the memo,
because as so often as the case, it suddenly seems
that all the media outlets, all the leftlandy media outlets
are reporting the same story in the same way. And
in this case, the message was and I'm not sure
(14:24):
how they think he's going to do this, but the
message essentially was Trump and the Republicans are going to
rig the midterm elections.
Speaker 4 (14:33):
They're going to rig it.
Speaker 3 (14:34):
Now I'm not Initially I said, I don't know quite
the mechanics of how they would do that, but apparently,
and also apparently it's no longer it's no longer shocking.
Speaker 2 (14:45):
Apparently to.
Speaker 4 (14:48):
Suggest that an election might get rigged.
Speaker 2 (14:52):
Yes, yeah, that was enough to get you canceled back
in late twenty twenty one, sorry, early twenty twenty one.
But yes, so there is that there's so much charter
going around that Donald Trump's trying to fix the election.
Part of that seems to be the accusations of major
taking place as if as if the Republicans are the
(15:16):
only party that have ever tried to to make a
seats safer for their core voters, right yeah, And of
course Gavin Knews some saying, well, if you know, if
Trump and the Republicans Jerry manned the Texas, we're gonna
we're just gonna do it everywhere. You've already been doing
it everywhere, you know, all.
Speaker 3 (15:37):
They well that's the thing, Mark, you know, see that
is that that is the key right there, the way
you what.
Speaker 4 (15:43):
You just said, because the Democrats.
Speaker 3 (15:46):
The reason, whether it's say and right now, the only
place Republicans are redistricting, and if you want to call
it jerry mandering, that depends on your point of view.
But where the Republicans are redistricting is in Texas. I mean,
it's not like they're doing it in every one of
the red states. But the thing is the Democrats they've already, like,
(16:07):
you know, states like Michigan.
Speaker 4 (16:10):
Have been already jerry mannered to the extreme.
Speaker 3 (16:14):
I mean, it's you know, we're at the point where
in some certain blue states it's pretty much impossible for
a Republican to win a seat in any congressional district
in some of these in some of these states because
they've already been jerry handed to the to the nth degree,
you know. So that and that's why I think the
(16:36):
Democrats are panicking because they're looking at Republicans doing some
redistrict in and then they're thinking, well, how can we
fight mac But they've already they've already done all they
can do. It's like, how do you how do you
redistrict anymore? It's like it's like you've cut the You've
cut the cake into into so many little slices.
Speaker 4 (16:55):
Now you can't cut it anymore.
Speaker 2 (16:57):
Drums crumbs is Nancy Pelosi might say about about anything really,
except of course that's her trading bankbook. So yeah, you've
got this basive idea being pushed by a lot in
the media. Also, some elected officials are talking about how
that's some bit big name ones as well. But the
(17:20):
fact is, if all of this redistricting or jerry mandery
goes ahead and and Democrats still win, I mean, what
has the narrative become Is we were so successfully overcame
the cheating that took place. Is that is that the
new narrative? And is there anybody in the country idiotic
(17:43):
enough to buy that as a particular story.
Speaker 4 (17:47):
Yeah. I think the way that the way a lot
of the left wing media operates, they are so blatantly.
Speaker 2 (17:56):
Willing to.
Speaker 3 (17:58):
Just completely dis regard what they were saying, you know,
a year ago, in order to say the opposite thing
today because it suits them.
Speaker 4 (18:06):
And I think, what's your scene?
Speaker 2 (18:08):
Mark?
Speaker 4 (18:09):
My view is that because of course you can't do that.
Speaker 3 (18:11):
You can't make all this hype about, oh, the Republicans
are going to rig the midterms, and then if the
Democrats actually pick up more.
Speaker 2 (18:18):
Seats than the Republicans.
Speaker 3 (18:20):
Yeah, exactly what do they say, Oh, they're stumped and
what But what the media will do is the media
will say, oh, we never, we simply never. We never
suggested that the Republicans were going to with the big terms.
Speaker 4 (18:33):
What are you talking about?
Speaker 2 (18:34):
You know, it's we've always been at war with East
Asia and don't let your your lying eyes tell you otherwise.
But yes, we will see what happens. And please do
go and read Graham's ar till on the pagers of
otnation dot com. It's fantastic, Graham Genoble, thanks for joining us.
Speaker 4 (18:51):
Thank you, Marx pleasure.
Speaker 2 (19:00):
You know that's what was free.
Speaker 4 (19:01):
Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of enterprise, and
freedom is special and rate.
Speaker 1 (19:07):
This is Liberty Nation with Markangeldes, a production of Libertynation
dot com, going after what the politicians really mean and
making it all clear for your freedom and your liberty.
Liberty Nation with Markangeledes.
Speaker 2 (19:24):
And you're back on libitin Nation radio head Coast to
Coast on the Radio America Network, our Manu host Mark
Anthony's We're during conversations with libert Nations Enterprise reporter Joe Schaefer,
who covers so many different beats, many of them with
a globalist bent, which I find one of the most
fascinating topics to cover because it's really masquerading Joe, isn't
(19:47):
it that these globalist ideas are masquerading as mainstream thought
when really they're quite outside the the Overton window. And
I think the one that's really taken root in the
last let's say six or seven years, maybe well longer actually,
to be honest with it, it is illegal immigration. And
(20:08):
while Trump now seems to have the US southern border
under control, I mean he's really got that under control,
it's quite surprising that it's happened without actual legislation having
to be put into place. We are still seeing an
influx of illegal migrants coming in by boat. And the
(20:32):
I've forgotten the name of the agency, it's the US
Naval Institute said that something along the lines of illegal
immigrant interdiction operations. We're in a state of emergency because
people are just coming in by boat and they don't
really know what to do about it because you can't
man every I mean, covering the southern border's tough enough,
(20:55):
but covering the entire coastal regions of the United States.
Is I mean, it's an impossible task, isn't it.
Speaker 5 (21:03):
Yeah, And I've written about that a couple of times. Uh,
Florida in California has had a major problem with this.
In California, they have these panga boats I believe they're called,
and they can just zip right in there and drop
off these legal aliens and they're in the heartland. And
of course under the Bodied administration, they really weren't making
(21:23):
much of an effort to to you know, to help
the state. South Florida would have loved to have cracked
down on it, but they weren't getting any federal help.
Speaker 2 (21:30):
Uh.
Speaker 5 (21:30):
You So Trump has stressed that they're gonna they're going
to step up you know, this in California and Florida.
And you know, again we see California doesn't want to
cooperate at all with the Trump administration. So that's an
interesting battle front. People are talking about Los Angeles and
San Francisco, they should be talking about the coastline, and
they know all these blue you know, because you've got
(21:53):
these blue radicals and these you know, fashionable towns on
the California coast. They're welcoming these boats. It's going to
be another major headache for ICE. You know, we've already
got these protests in the cities, So yeah, it is
a major problem that has kind of gone under the
radar when we're talking about this massive deportation operation.
Speaker 2 (22:15):
Yeah, it's it's almost a backdoor way of facilitating illegal immigration.
Boats turn up like San Diego, and they just get
off the boats, they disappear into the interior the United States.
Who knows who they are, who knows where they're going,
who knows what their intentions are. And because it's not
(22:37):
the kind of places that's really patrolled by anyway, because
you can't due to the sheer size it is, it's
the perfect entry point for people who wish the United
States harm because they know they're not going to encounter
border patrol agents. They know that in certain locales they're
going to get a welcoming blanket and a hot meal
(23:00):
and be on your way, good sir, And then they
wander off and who knows what they're doing. And this
is a particular interest to me because I'm from the
United Kingdom and what we've seen over the last few
years there is just a massive surge of what the
(23:20):
media always terms asylum seekers, even though these are people
that have traveled through numerous safe countries to France, and
France is not at war. There's no good reason to
be fleeing France, I might add. And then they embark
on an admittedly dangerous journey across the Channel in boats
(23:40):
that are often unfit, and they get ashore, they get processed,
they get put up in hotels, they get put up
in houses of multiple occupancy and strange new bill barracks
or things in small towns and villages across the United Kingdom,
and it is really, it is really pushing Britain's to
(24:07):
the brink, made worse by the fact that just this
last week an online Digital Safety Bill came into being,
which was made law by the former Conservative government the
Tory Party, and came into force just this week passed
(24:28):
and it was billed as this will stop children accessing
pornography online. And what it actually did, as we've now seen,
is it means that anybody sharing pictures of, for example,
anti legal immigration protests, all these pictures get blocked out
and you have to verify who you are to look
(24:50):
at the pictures. And at the same time we hear
that the government is setting up I believe the term
is I might have this slightly wrong, but it's the
worse the effect of a crack police unit that will
be looking for anti illegal immigrant sentiment online. And it's
almost as though the UK government doesn't want people complaining
(25:12):
about people breaking laws to get into the United Kingdom.
And it seems to me that the two stories, the
US side and the UK side, they're both linked, they're similar,
and it's for the same reasons.
Speaker 5 (25:27):
It's for that I tried not to smile when you
were talking about a very you know, or welly in
an unpleasant situation, but it's hard not to smile when
you see them using the same playbook over and over again.
They've done it my entire life. I was a child
in the seventies, in nineteen eighties and I saw it.
Then they say, this is for your own good. They
(25:48):
take something hideous like your child pornography, pornography. We have
to protect the kids. The Simpsons did the TV show,
they would make this a running joke, the hysterical woman saying,
won't some any think of the children?
Speaker 2 (26:02):
You use that line.
Speaker 5 (26:03):
And you could do anything. You can absolutely do anything.
So they use that, hey, we got to protect these kids,
come up with this harsh you know, online censorship law,
and now they are going to My understanding is they
have already arrested people for making anti migrant comments on
the internet. That's going on in this supposedly free United
(26:23):
Kingdom right now, and so that the footprint, the way
they got their foot in the tyrannical door is saying
we've got to protect kids from pornography, and then zoom,
they go right for their globalist agenda. They've been doing
it literally my entire life. I'm sure they've been doing
it your entire life in the UK. And you know
they use these cultural you know tools weapons to such
(26:46):
and they've used it to great effect for decades. So
why should they stop. There's no reason for them to stop.
Speaker 2 (26:51):
The the author and known as the Big Conspiracy theorist
very political as well, I might add David Ike he
calls it the totalitarian tiptoe, where they introduce something and
move it several steps further along by using what he
(27:12):
calls a problem reaction solution. So there's a problem, or
there's a problem that's created and then the people say
that people have the reaction, Oh no, won't someone think
of the children, which is the desired reaction, And then
they have a prepackaged solution that just happens to infringe
upon your individual rights. But people are clamoring for it,
(27:34):
and it's a disaster from which there appears to be
no stepping back. I think that's quite a tragic situation
that liberty's wants given away are so rarely returned.
Speaker 5 (27:51):
Yeah, I mean, that's it in a nutshell, and I'm
kind of I didn't get the chop to talk about
it in greater terms. We Rannning Nero the conversation and immigration,
but it.
Speaker 2 (28:01):
Is just a total cultural.
Speaker 5 (28:03):
Weaponization against the citizens of a nation, and we see
it over and over again. I think they know it's
not convincing anybody anymore, which is why you're seeing it
being more harsh, more tyrannical, more out in the open, punitive,
because that's really the only card they have left at
this point is to scare people to threaten number, jail time,
(28:25):
et cetera, et cetera. They've lost the argument on immigration,
in my opinion, in nation after nation, they've lost the argument,
and now it comes can they hold on to their
Fortress because there's no winning on their side anymore. They
just want to keep trying to push something that the
people of these countries do not want.
Speaker 2 (28:46):
We're going to continue this conversation with Joe Schaefer after
this shortbreak.
Speaker 4 (28:49):
Don't go anywhere.
Speaker 1 (28:55):
For your freedom and your liberty. Liberty Nation with more.
Speaker 2 (29:00):
Lees, and you're back on Liberty Nation Radio. We'll continue
our conversation with Liberty Nations Enterprise reporter Joe Shaffer. Thanks
for sticking around, Joe. Now, we touched on this briefly
in the last segment, but I kind of want to
expand on it a bit because there's been and for me,
it's kind of flown under the radar. People have put
out a couple of oh, look at Donald Trump, isn't
(29:22):
he being silly type articles in the left leaning Fourth
Estate discussing at re changing the names of Washington, DC's
sport teams. But it's not. It's not a silly story,
and it's not a silly behavior to try and bring
(29:43):
something back to what it was when it's been destroyed
or changed due to what's the best way to say this, Joe,
an ideology that seeks to pattern itself on top of
everything and say that this is the this is the
dominant thought process, when it's not really the case. It's
(30:03):
a very elitist bubble thought process that's being put over
the top of things.
Speaker 5 (30:13):
There's a lot of ways we can go on this one.
I call it deliberate demoralization. First of all, because if
you notice when they change these sports names, they always
go to the lamest, most bland, dull name possible. That's
not a coincidence. They take a beloved, cherish name. The
Cleveland Indians, as Trump has said, was one of the
original teams, you know, going back to the eighteen nineties,
(30:37):
early nineteen hundreds. Uh, you know, the Washington Redskins, an
iconic NFL franchise, the Redskins, Redskins Cowboys, a great rivalry,
you know, really captures your imagination. And so they want
to dull your imagination. They want to you know, they
want to pound you into blendness. Let's call them the Commanders,
the lamest name we can come up with. Let's change
(30:58):
the Indians to the clean lynd Guardians, which I guess
is named after a bridge or something like the icons
on a bridge. Again appeals to nobody. So that's that's
not a coincidence. They want to dull it down. They
want to they want to demoralize you. But I also
think they realize that this is a very potent weapon
in their arsenal, the cultural arsenal. I just wrote an article.
(31:21):
If this is where you talk about globalism being interesting, fascinating,
the psychological side of it, it's very important to them.
So I wrote an article about populism is on the
rise in Japan now because they're having the same problems
that we're seeing in nation after nation in the West, immigration,
suffering economy, that they're feeling that a corrupt government only
(31:43):
serves itself. Well, as what I wrote up in the
article is that the populist party that is on the
rise specifically pointed out that multinational corporations are feeding globalism,
and so I quoted I quoted the leading crowd company
in Japan. The ceo, who's who was born in India
(32:05):
is all he wants more immigration to Japan, came out
and said we need to hire less Japanese, we need
to hire more foreigners because we just can't have Japanese
employees in our increasingly global cooperation. So he he is
backing up everything the Populist Party said, and again this
(32:25):
is this is like the Dorritos of Japan. I don't
even know if I don't know Japanese culture well enough
if that's but that's how popular they are. They are
like a cultural icon in Japan, and so it's no
mistake that they'll be part of this globalist cartel. You
see it with Dorito's is owned by Fredo l which
is owned by Pepsi. Pepsi was one of the worst
(32:46):
woke companies of the past ten twenty years. You see
it with Guinness in Ireland, you know, which is like
the unofficial official you know, alcoholic beverage of Ireland or
one of them. You know, they're owned by de Jo,
a multinational corporation for years have pushed globalism on Ireland
in the world though the most woke stuff. They are
(33:07):
one of the worst companies and they own just they
own so many companies around the world. So this isn't
a coincidence. You see in Ireland, Japan, America. I'm sure
you can point out examples in England of beloved cultural sports,
entertainment institutions repurposed for the for the globalist propaganda mantras.
Speaker 2 (33:29):
It's it's even worse. In the United Kingdom. We've had
elected politicians in high positions say that they're offended by
seeing the flag of England being flown, and it's it
is demoralizing you right there. There's this concerted effort to
to make people either turn away from symbols that used
(33:55):
to matter or denigrate to the symbols that used to matter.
Because you can't build a new world order if the
old world order is still standing, Joe, it just doesn't work.
You've got to you've got to break down the foundations
of it. Now, let's dive a little deeper into this
(34:18):
what's happening in Japan, because it's it's actually quite fascinating.
Speaker 5 (34:21):
Now.
Speaker 2 (34:21):
We have seen across Western countries, Europe, the United States,
we have seen the rise of populists, and it's it's
quite apparent. It's the it's the growing political ideology of
the day. I think it is a more populous bent
(34:42):
towards politics. But we didn't expect to see that in
somewhere like Japan that you know, from the outside looking in,
it's always been this is a very stayed, a very
conservative monoculture, as it were. But it's true, they are
having the same globalist problems, and it's driven in part
(35:05):
by a multinational corporations that want to see the same affication.
I think I've just made up that word, but I
love it, the same affication of the world. So no
matter where you go, you see the same shops, you
can buy the same pair of shoes, and politicians who
look to globalist enfranchisement as the way of the future.
(35:31):
And I think it was Bertrand Russell who wrote that
socialism is the only way forward, and the only way
to do that is by having a one world government.
And sure a lot of people tried it after Bertrand
Russell wrote about it, and that's what led to one
hundred million deaths. But I don't blame Bertran Russell, of course.
(35:55):
But we see it with politicians. They want things more global.
They're not interested in the now national corporations are the same.
They're one thing's global. They'm not interested in the national.
What do the people want?
Speaker 5 (36:06):
Yeah, I was addressing I can't even pretend to be
an expert on Japan at all. A lot of this
was new to me. But as you said, I've been
writing about globalism for so long, so you.
Speaker 2 (36:16):
Go into it.
Speaker 5 (36:17):
It was literally like going into a new country for me,
already knowing that the playbook the playbook that they were out.
So it's like, Okay, what am I looking for here?
An entrenched, increasingly unpopular government trying to hold on the
power that they've had for decades that they feel slipping away.
And what else am I looking for here? The powerful
corporate interests who want to go global? And I found
(36:40):
them both right away. You know, I could have written
a ten thousand word article on that. You guys don't
like that when I write that. Wait, when I write that, body.
Speaker 2 (36:47):
We prefer them a little shorter, just a little you know.
Speaker 5 (36:50):
I got to hit stop. But there's just so much material.
So let's go with Japan. You talk about a UNI
party and I did not know this at all. The
ruling construct and hip has been in power for sixty
five out of the past sixty nine years. I mean,
that's just insane, that's crazy. And so that came up
with the idea that the Japanese are satisfied with their government. Well,
(37:11):
they were satisfied when they had a booming economy for
decades after World War Two, but that's been gone for
a while now, and they the Japanese people feel that
the economy today, which is going global, which is thinking global,
is not concerned with the Japanese people. And so they
have the same problems that you see in America in Europe,
(37:33):
where prices are rising, the people can't afford it. They
have a demographic crisis, the birth rate crisis. And they've
got politicians these saying politicians that just want to hold
onto power, saying in the corporations saying I've got the solution,
more immigrants, Let's bring more people in. And this people
of the country Japan, Europe, America are saying, what about us,
(37:57):
Why don't we have a government that takes care of
us us? But the first thing they hear from from
their their politicians and their big corporate leaders is we
need to bring in others, you know, others to to feed,
to keep feeding the monolith that they control, but that
the people feel doesn't serve them at all. So why
(38:17):
should they Why should they be invested in this monolith
that they don't care about anymore. And so that's that's
the tension you're seeing it in nation after nation. It's
really not a surprise that it would happen in Japan.
I'm surprised people are so surprised because the entire formula,
all the ingredients that we've seen in Europe and America
(38:39):
are absolutely there in Japan.
Speaker 2 (38:42):
Yeah, it's a it's a it's a cut and paste
form of globalism. Put the things that take it from here,
you can apply it over there. And when you hear
that there's a populist party on their rise, you can
almost guarantee that, all right, let's let's look at the
fact as contributing to it. And as you say, it
always seems to be the problem to all of the
(39:02):
globalist issues. As they say we need more immigration, it's
almost as though that's their driving force. Joe Shaefer, I
want to thank you for coming in talking with us. Audience.
Please do go and check out Joe's writings over at
libertinnation dot com. They are eye opening. Thanks for being here, Joe,
thank you, and that's all we have time for this
week's edition of Liberal Nation radio head Coach Coast on
(39:24):
the Radio American Network. I've been your host, Mark Angela's
I'd like to thank our guests for today, Graham, j
Noble and Joe Shaffer and of course extend my thanks
to you the audience, for tuning in each and every
week here on the Radio American Network. You are appreciated.
Please do remember Liberty Nation does not endorse candidates, campaigns,
or legislation, and this presentation is no endorsement.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.