Mon Episode #2130: Nigeria: Another War for the Peace Prize President?

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:52):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act.

Speaker 2 (00:59):
It's the David Night Show.

Speaker 3 (01:05):
Well, as the clock strikes thirteen, it is Monday, the
third of November. I am your secondary host, Travis Knight.
David will be here shortly. We're gonna play you some
quick music once the intro ends, and then we'll get
right into the show and all the news that we
have for you today. So stay with us.

Speaker 2 (02:36):
Welcome back to the folks, to the show, folks. At
a rough start today, we got a lot of wars
to talk about. Actually we've got a new one being
talked about, Nigerian War. We have, of course, the Venezuela
War ramping up. We have a class war here in
the US. And underneath all this is a spiritual war,

(02:56):
in a fight for the Constitution as well. So let's
begin with the Nigerian War. Now, you know that I
care a great deal about this has been going on,
a massive, massive killing and real genocide has been going
on since two thousand and nine. Trump ignored it his
entire four years that he was in office, and of
course Obama and the Democrats are there as with their

(03:20):
own agenda ignoring it. The things that they want to do,
if not supporting it actively. And so this has been
a part of what has been happening. Now for how
long is this now? I guess about sixteen years or
so right, and now he is paying attention to it.
And the question is why is this in order to

(03:42):
virtue signal to his base after the tremendous missteps that
he's had. He has shot himself in the foot with
the Epstein stuff. He shot hisself in the foot with
this government shutdown and the snap program and the rest
of the stuff we're going to get into. That just
unbelievably stupid approach to all of this stuff. And so

(04:02):
is this a way for him to try to claw
back support? I think that's a part of it. There's
also the aspect that China is in that area and
there's a lot of resources and minerals that they'd like
to get, so that's always a big part of it.
But I think primarily this is virtue signaling from Trump.
And the question is, even though as you know, I

(04:22):
want to see this stop, there are ways to do
this and there's ways not to do it. I think
that the means that you choose to do things is
always even more important than the end goal that is there.
And this is just another example of an imperial caesar
who will go to war on his own whims anywhere
that he wants to do. I think he's got a

(04:43):
good reason. Unlike Venezuela. There's absolutely no reason to do
regime change there. But Celta Gabbert is saying, we don't
do regime change anymore, as it is happening all around here.
Question we don't do regime Well, these people ever tell
you the truth about anything. Everybody is even admitting it.
You've got senators threatening Maduro and saying, I don't know

(05:05):
what he's going to do. He just needs to get
out of there. He needs to go somewhere, he needs
to go to Rush or China or whatever. But he
needs to get out of there. We're going to kill him.
Don't tell me we don't do regime change, Tulsie. It's
just unbelievable. And so this is a good cause, it's
a really good cause to try to stop this. There's
a lot of ways that it could be done though,
rather than going in guns ablazing and declaring war. But

(05:27):
this is a part of his virtue signaling. So this
happened on Saturday. We wake up and we see Trump
is fantasizing about yet another war. I guess we could
come up with an acronym yeah yaw, yet another war.
And that's exactly the response to Pentagon Pete yah yah, sir, Yeah,
we do whatever you want. So he's an imperial president,

(05:51):
does as he wishons. So what he's saying is if
the government fails to protect the religious minority, he's going
to do something about it. And of course we know,
oh I've I guess I've been talking about this. We
just had a guest on last week, and the government
there is not only turning a blind eye to what
the Filani herdsmen are doing, but they're also essentially protecting them.

(06:16):
And so there's absolutely no question about this in the
mind of anyone except for the BBC and other mainstream
media going out there and saying, wow, there's no evidence
to show that they are targeting Christians more than any
other group. They're just killing everybody. Oh okay, so that's fine.
I guess this is the insanity that we're seeing here.

(06:37):
If the Nigerian government continues to allow the killing of Christians,
the USA will immediately stop all aid and assistance to Nigeria,
because we've got everybody on the welfare role except American citizens.
Not that I'm for welfare, and we'll talk about that
coming up. But there's the right way and wrong way
to do everything. Trump wants to do everything abruptly, with

(06:58):
no transition. He wants to do everything, and the way
he does it, he causes the maximum amount of destruction
and chaos everywhere. So he says, if they don't do that,
we may now go into this disgraced country guns of blazing,
said Trump, to completely wipe out the Islamic terrorists who
are committing these horrible atrocities. Well, we don't have that works,

(07:22):
don't we? Did anybody remember Afghanistan and Iraq? Do we
remember who these are? History? With a symmetric warfare, I'm
here by instructing the Department of War to prepare for
possible action. If we attack, it'll be fast, vicious and sweet. Sweet.
What kind of a sick person sweet describes a war

(07:45):
as sweet? Trump? That's the kind of person, does it?
The kind of person that executes people and boats without
knowing even who they are or what they have done,
no due process, He says, just like the terrorist thugs
attack our chair Christians. Warning the Nigerian government better move fast,
he says, an all upper case well, he said, the

(08:08):
day before Christianity's facing an existential threat in Nigeria. Thousands
of Christians are being killed. Radical Islamicists are responsible for
this mass slaughter. I'm hereby making Nigeria quote a country
a particular concern, but that's the least of it, he said.
And of course that is a term from the State
Department that has a particular meaning to it in terms

(08:31):
of sanctions and other things like that. One Boko Haram survivor,
his name is Paul Adamu applauds the president's designation of
Nigeria as a country of particular concern. And again I
have no problem with declaring that and having sanctions and
economic pressure. For once. I would support that type of thing,

(08:53):
but we shouldn't be giving welfare to a country that
has been killing Christians all throughout his first term and
most of the term of Bronck Obama. Matter of fact,
that through the entire term of Barack Obama and that
he got elected in two thousand and eight, came in
in two thousand and nine, so it's during Obama's entire

(09:14):
eight years, Trump's four years, Biden's four years.

Speaker 3 (09:18):
There's also the fact that this welfare for the world
is basically leading to a larger humanitarian crisis down the road.

Speaker 2 (09:25):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (09:25):
Yeah, These countries have not put it towards infrastructure, they
haven't put it towards increasing their ability to take care
of their own people. It's been largely taken by the
few people at the top, and then a little bit
has gone out to the people at the bottom, and
it's only allowed. And all they've done with it is
increase their population base, meaning there's now more mouths to
feed than there were. They've just expanded their population base

(09:45):
to what they can support at the moment. And that's
only possible because the US is stimulating their economies, which
means that now there's even more people.

Speaker 2 (09:55):
That are really even stimulating their economies. The people at
the top of the corupt people. And the person who
started all in a big way was Robert McNamara after
the Vietnam War disaster that he presided over. Then he
goes to the IMF and he started cutting loans to
these different countries, and they were not for infrastructure. They
were not for building up the economy of the country.

(10:16):
Even they were simply kind of a welfare payment to
the leaders. And everybody said, you're creating dependency, and they are.
And even though the leaders taking the line's share of it,
some of it is trickling down. A little bit of
it trickles down to the other people. What's going to
happen when the US dollar goes bully up? This is
going to be the SNAP issue. You know, we got

(10:38):
world wide welfare, not just here in America, but worldwide welfare.
You know, we've got more people on the SNAP program
than live in Canada. We got forty two million people
on this food welfare program. How did he get to
be that big? Well, we're going to talk about that
when we come back. How did we get to the
point where we got everybody in the world on American welfare? Well,

(10:59):
it's because you can see it when it's with other
foreign countries. You know that it's an instrument of control.
And this is why when I talked to the MAGA
people and they were talking about the emergency and oh,
it's just the bad democratic governors, I said, no, money
is a way that everything is controlled. And Trump declared
the emergency for COVID so he could release the funds

(11:20):
because it is a tool of control. He is the
one who is controlling everybody, bribing them or blackmailing them
to do the lockdown, just as they control other countries
with their sanctions or with their welfare. So this guy
survived the Islamist terror. He's a Christian living in Nigeria.

(11:41):
He was kidnapped two years ago by Jihadis militant group
Boko Haram while traveling to Cameroon to meet colleagues. He
said his ordeal reflects the growing danger faced by Christians
across the region and he hopes US action will end
years of brutal attacks. I would say that Nigeria is
the worst place to be as a Christian. We wake
up every day with news of killing, every day with

(12:03):
the news of massacres of Christians. That's what's happening here
in Nigeria. Trump announced Saturday the US will immediately stop
all aid and assistance to the West African nation if
the government continues to allow the killing of Christians, and
may even go into the country guns ablazing. His phrase
to completely wipe out the Islamic terrorists responsible a Nigerian

(12:27):
president is denying that widespread violence targets Christians. Again, it's
got about as much credibility as a Nigerian prints. The
characterization of Nigeria is religiously intolerant does not reflect our
national reality. That's unbelievable somebody make a statement like that,

(12:47):
Nor does it take into consideration the consistent, sincere efforts
of the government to safeguard freedom of religion and beliefs
for all Nigerians. I guess you know, what are these
people trying to say, you know, we know all these
people are being killed. Is that to say, well, we're
not doing it because we hate their religion, so it's okay,
and we're not going to do anything as a government

(13:08):
to try to stop it. Adamu, the guy who was kidnapped,
said he witnessed the persecution of Christians firsthand. Women mourning
their husband's children, crying for parents, and parents grieving for children.
There is nothing anybody will tell me, because I have
been there or as long as I know, I've been
in these places where these attacks have taken place. I've

(13:30):
been to churches that have been burnt down. These are
not things that I've heard from the news This is
not somebody telling me. This is something I witnessed somewhere
I've been myself. I've witnessed where terrorism is at the
highest point, where people are killed and slaughtered like chickens
every day. He said, Well again, Bena, God is preparing

(13:51):
for yet another war. Because you know, when you've only
got one tool, you've only got a hammer, everything looks
like a nail and you've got to hammer it right.
And this is what is so morally and legally bankrupt
about this Trump administration. Everything is a war. We're going
to send the military in for all of this, and
there has to be a reason for this. And if

(14:13):
you're going to have a moral war, you need to
have the principles that are laid out. And I'm not
saying that we just leave these Christians to die. Maybe
the answer is that you take them out as real refugees.
Remember the fraud about this massive wave of immigration is
the fact that you know these are refugees. Well, there

(14:35):
are some real refugees that are there, so they can
move them to another country, do something to help these people,
get them out of there. But it's not you know,
when you go to when you start a war, you
should understand that there are consequences for it beyond the
profits the military industrial complex.

Speaker 4 (14:53):
So a matter of you know, you can't be a
Christian in North Korea either. There are places in.

Speaker 2 (14:59):
The world that are terrible, that's right.

Speaker 4 (15:00):
It's not the US's military's job to go wipe them out.
That's it's only going to create more conflict.

Speaker 2 (15:08):
That's right. Yeah, we cannot be the world's policeman. That's
the Truman doctrine, and it it's been disastrous. That's been
the doctrine my entire life, even before I was born,
and that is a failed model. We do not want
to be the world's policeman. We don't have the resources,
we don't have the moral justification to do that type
of thing.

Speaker 3 (15:29):
Once you start down this pathway, there is always a
humanitarian crisis going on somewhere. Yeah, the world is always
in chaos. If your stated goal is to go out
there and remove the chaos, you will never be done
with it.

Speaker 2 (15:44):
Well, as John Adams said, we don't go abroad seeking
monsters to destroy it. There's no limit to the number
of monsters that will never be done.

Speaker 3 (15:51):
It's always the justification for further war, further militarization, just
anything you need, like, well, we got to make the
world safe. This country over here, it's terrible what they're doing,
and it is it is terrible what they're doing. Yeah,
But as I said, if it's your stated goal to
stop that, it will not stop there. There'll be another country,
and then another country and then another country.

Speaker 2 (16:12):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (16:12):
Yeah, little did the founders know that we'd go around
looking for monsters to fund. That seems to be the current.

Speaker 2 (16:22):
Yeah. So all, like I said, eight years of Obama,
four years of Biden, four years of Trump, and we
were funding the monster that we now seek to destroy.
So and that includes monsters like al Qaeda, which we
began when it was called the Mujahdeen, and we continued
to fund them as al Qaeda, We continued to fund

(16:43):
them as Isis, as al Nusra. We even used our
air force to help them in Syria.

Speaker 3 (16:49):
I bring this up every time. I'm pretty sure, but
I believe it's. At the end of Rambo three, the
text pops up and says, this film is dedicated to
the brave fighters of the muja Hadeen because the time
they were the good guys, they were our buddies, our friends,
they're helping us beat the Russians in Afghanistan. We love
the muja Hadeen. And then over time as things progressed
and we weren't so friendly with them, they went back

(17:11):
and they edited the movie so that text is gone,
it doesn't show up. He wouldn't want some modern audience
watching Rambo three and going what's the muja Hadeen and
then googling that and going down a rabbit hole.

Speaker 2 (17:22):
Yeah. Well, John McCain used to go around to Republican
women fundraisers and he would bring with him a muja
hadeen guy and tell them that they could donate and
fund amuje right, and so that's what we got. Yeah, Yeah,
he was smoosing with emotion. Boca haaram.

Speaker 4 (17:44):
Something you consider how Bush was friendly with what's his.

Speaker 3 (17:48):
Name, tim Osmon.

Speaker 2 (17:50):
Yeah, that's right. So Bokoharam. Shihad insurgency has killed more
than forty thousand people, has displaced more than two million
since two and nine, and this is according to the UN.
The UN is not out there with any real concern
for Christians of course, right, So but the BBC is
going to push back against this. I'm going to give

(18:11):
that to you here at the moment, majority Muslim herders
have repeatedly clashed with majority Christian farmers. Christian's played a
central role in Trump's campaign to return to office and
was fundamental in securing a large, reliable voting block among white,
evangelical and conservative Christians, says the UK Telegraph. Well, and
I think that is the primary that's my judgment. Primarily.

(18:35):
I think this is virtue signaling. Now. Of course, the
military industrial complex was war everywhere with everyone all the time,
because that's their money and they don't care that, just
like the pharmaceutical companies, they'll kill for profit. Last month,
Ted Cruz accused the Nigerian government of turning a blind
eye to the mass murder of Christians. And again, this

(18:57):
has been going on for sixteen years. In Nigeria. Ethnic religious,
and regional divisions have flared with deadly consequences in the
past and still shape the country's modern politics. And the
presidents say, no, no, no, we love everybody right. Religious
freedom and tolerance have been a core tenet of our

(19:18):
collective identity and will always be. So. This is like
the people as telling you how much they love freedom
of speeches. They're shutting it down on Sunday, Nigeria said
it would welcome the US help and fighting as long
as insurgents, as long as its territorial integrity was respected.

Speaker 3 (19:35):
I've got some bad news for them.

Speaker 2 (19:37):
That ain't the way that it works. So Nigeria has
vast reserves of rare earth elements and there it is
as well as lithium, cobalt, and nickel, which are all
needed for the battery stuff. No, I think this may
be why this has come up now, but I think
that the virtue signaling that Trump needs to do to

(19:57):
his base is a big part of this as well.

Speaker 3 (20:01):
They're Muslims are killing the end where they killing again Christians?
All right, yeah, those guys.

Speaker 2 (20:06):
I love those guys.

Speaker 3 (20:07):
We've got to stop them.

Speaker 2 (20:08):
But the most amazing statement, of course, you'd expect the
leader who has been complicit with these people to deny it.
But I think the most amazing thing is the BBC.
But of course we have seen how the British government
absolutely detests Christianity. They're not killing people yet, but they're
doing everything they can to shut it down. They're arresting
people who pray silently. You've got other EU countries, We've

(20:32):
got a former ministry official and has been elected many
times to the Parliament at Finland, and she has been persecuted,
literally persecuted by the prosecutor there. The guy has come
after her. This is now the third time. The first
two times she took it to the Supreme Court and

(20:55):
they unanimously shut down this guy. And so even though
he unanimously uses twice, he comes back for a third time.
And so again this guy is not a prosecutor. He's
a persecutor. So we see that Christianity is truly hated,
especially by the British government. So BBC says there is
no evidence to suggest that Christians are being disproportionately targeted

(21:18):
in Nigeria. Just an unbelievable line. But of course they
do it all the time. It's about climate change or
any of the rest of this stuff. Trump did not
say which killings he was referring to, but the claims
of a genocide against Nigeria's Christians have been circulating in
recent weeks and months in right wing US circles. I've
been talking about it for years. This is the dishonesty

(21:40):
of the BBC is truly amazing. And of course they're
trying to institute their own Muslim caliphate there in the UK.
Groups monitoring violence say there's no evidence to suggest that
Christians are being killed more than Muslims. What groups are
doing this? They don't name anybody, they don't talk about
any studies, they don't quote anybody with this except for

(22:01):
some Nigerian officials, so they have absolutely no proof of this.
This is some of the most dishonest journalism I've ever seen,
and that's saying, you know, this is even for BBC dishonest.

Speaker 3 (22:13):
There are no stabbings happening, says man holding blood knife.

Speaker 2 (22:16):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (22:16):
Well, asked the murderers if they committed genocide and they
said no, So you know this is all an absurd
conspiracy theory.

Speaker 2 (22:23):
Well, they say, the Jihadis are not targeting members of
particular religion. They kill people from all face. So there
we go. That's that's not the BBC's excuse for why
we should not be concerned about.

Speaker 3 (22:33):
This opportunity and hand it about it.

Speaker 2 (22:36):
That's right, we mass murder everybody.

Speaker 3 (22:38):
See, that's what made Hitler worse than Stalin in particular
groups he disliked. You know, if you're willing to murder everyone,
you're fine. You know, when you start getting selective about it,
that's when it becomes a problem. Otherwise, go for it.
You want to murder one hundred million people, that is
totally okay. Just as long as it's one hundred million

(23:00):
randomly selected people, that's fine.

Speaker 2 (23:03):
Well, people that you don't like politically somehow as well.
It's sollen so the country a particular concern. What does
that mean? Well, this is a designation used by the
State Department to provide for sanctions against countries engaged in
severe violations of religious freedom, and so again, I think
it would be justified to have sanctions. I think it'd

(23:23):
be justified to put the kinds of over the top
sanctions that they have done with Russia, in the sense that, well,
if you violate these sanctions, then we're going and you
trade with them anyway, then we've got sanctions against them.
But if you don't abide and go along with our sanctions,
we're going to sanction you as well. I mean, you
could do that type of thing. There's many things that

(23:45):
you could do to help these people, to get them
out of there, but to send in the military is
always their first response, and it is a foolish policy.
You've seen over and over again. Shiatis groups such as
Yokohaam and Islamic State West African Province have wrought havoc

(24:05):
in northeastern Nigeria for more than a decade, killing thousands
of people. Says the BBC, more than forty thousand, A
couple of million displaced real quickly.

Speaker 3 (24:17):
Just when people joined the American military. I've known guys
that went in there. What they wanted to do was
they wanted to defend America, at least the guy is
that you know, I grew up around. They were very
much into the you know, I want to protect freedom,
I want to protect America. You know, we realize that's
kind of bunk now, but when you're young and you've
absorbed a lot of propaganda.

Speaker 2 (24:36):
So I saw that a lot with the Vietnam War,
right because we were told that it was really kind
of a you know, only one step away from a threat,
direct threat to the US because of the Domino theory.
And it was a Chinese communists that were doing it.
So the people that I saw when I was a
kid that were of draft age, they were going and
they were gung ho to go. And then as people

(24:58):
started to see what was happening with and that was
being conducted by mcnamaron, Johnson and Nixon, then they started
to wake up to what the real thing was.

Speaker 3 (25:08):
But it's just they sign up to defend America. That's
what their oath is about. Sending them to other countries
to defend anything else is not part of what they
signed up for. It is a tragic waste of their
life and a misuse of it. It is taking their
oath in vain and saying, yeah, I know what you
signed up for, I know what we promised you this
was about, but we don't really care.

Speaker 2 (25:29):
And this what's different about this. I'm not trying to
make this into even an indirect existential threat to the
United States like they have done, like even in Venezuela. Okay,
these people they're shipping drugsist lie, and they're killing Americans.
Why and so we've got to go kill them, lie,
so we can not have regime change and not take
over the oil.

Speaker 3 (25:52):
We're done with regime change. Yeah, that's that was killing
me last night reading this. Tulsi Gabbert saying, we're absolutely
done with regime change, guys, and you've got Trump in
the White House sitting on true social maybe some resive
regime change, maybe just a little bit might do a
little bit of regime change.

Speaker 2 (26:05):
You've been talking about having the CIA, they're openly talking
about using the CIA against them, and then the Senators
who are saying the same thing as well. Yeah, so anyway.

Speaker 4 (26:12):
Came first the guns of blazing tweets or her saying
that we don't do regime change.

Speaker 2 (26:17):
Yeah, that's right. Well again, here's the BBC. There is
no evidence that Christians have been disproportionately targeted. They just
repeat this mantra about every couple of paragraphs. So the
meanwhile you have on Fox News they show pictures of
Jihadis massacres and the bones stacked in the mass graves.

(26:38):
Even being conservative, it's probably four thousand to eight thousand
Christians killed annually, said Walker, who was a congressman. He said,
this has been going on for years, from I swap
to Islamist Fulani ethnic militias. The Nigerian government has to
be more proactive. They've not only been passive, they have

(26:58):
covered up. Walker is a former pastor in a Republican
congressman from North Carolina, although he has not yet been
confirmed he already works with church networks across Africa to
keep missionaries and local believers safe. There's absolutely no question
about what's going on. And you know, the BBC has

(27:21):
taken an absurd approach to push back on this systematically
targeted information. They denied that the Christians are systematically target
This is the information Minister Mohammed Idris told Fox News.
I question named Mohammed. It might be a little bit, yeah,

(27:42):
I mean, it is a religion of peace and a
country at peace right and as we've heard anyway, it is.
It is truly amazing that they would take this tack
and like I said, I'm very concerned about it, and
you know, we need to do something tangible to help people,
not just say this is a problem. These are the

(28:03):
wrong things. There's so many things that could be done,
and sending in the military with guns are blazing, as
Trump says, is not the right way to proceed. So
we're going to take a quick break. Do you want
to read the comments here?

Speaker 3 (28:17):
Yes, before we go, I R S machine gun. Thank
you very much, big support. Does anyone have sixty minutes
to set and listen to me? Tell you how great
I am. I'm assuming that's got to be about our
wonderful president.

Speaker 2 (28:30):
Yeah, I'm going.

Speaker 3 (28:32):
To tell you a speech. It's going to be a
speech about how wonderful Donald J. Trump is. That's me
in case you're wondering, con Think, Thank you very much,
con Think. Really do appreciate the support. Move over monster Mash.
It's time for the David Night Christmas album.

Speaker 2 (28:45):
Yeah, he'll be doing that pretty soon. That's right. It'll
be for ay support. And just let everybody know. We
went there and totaled everything up for the month, and
I really do appreciate your support. We've got after about
eighty two percent. The gas gauge has not been updated.
There's been a lot of things happening here. We've had
a death in the face and Karris brotherho normally does that.

(29:05):
I was not able to get that stuff up, So anyway,
just let you know and thank you all for your support.
Thank you so much. I had the list put together
of the names on zel and I forgot to get
it on my device, So I'm really ill prepared today.
So many things have been going on, that's right.

Speaker 3 (29:21):
Today, The show is ill.

Speaker 2 (29:23):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (29:23):
Defy Tyrants seventeen seventy six. Trump Cares about Christians in Nigeria,
but helps murder Christians in Gaza. How can anybody believe anything?
He says, that's right, it's a good point. Yeah, yeah,
that's going on. Israel is no friend of Christians. I'm
sure all of you have seen the videos of the
Christians getting spit on and mocked and ridiculed when they

(29:43):
go there to take the tours of the Holy Land
to see, oh wow, this is where Christ walked. This
is a special important place. And the people of Israel,
a lot of them hate Christians. They don't just have
a you know, well they're wrong, think about they specifically
hate Christians. Yeah, they hate christ Yeah, they are not
they're not friends.

Speaker 2 (30:03):
Well, the thing is that, you know, that's an aspect
of it as well. It's cost him a lot of
It's not just the Epstein thing. It's not just you know,
what's going on with the snap stuff and the farmers,
but it is also what's going on in Gaza. And
you know a lot of people realize that Christians have
been targeted by Trump and his controllers, and so this

(30:24):
is a reason for him to make a show of this.

Speaker 3 (30:28):
We've got bulldog, he says, peace or we will kill you.
That's right, you're gonna be good. I'll turn this car around,
so help me Denver Adaway. Oh yes, the USA and
Israel cares so much about terrorism, having been the primary
creators of it in the region, dating to the events
leading to the creation of Israel and the UK.

Speaker 2 (30:47):
Yeah, that's why I want to call people narco terrorists.
It's like, are you talking about the CIA? I mean,
these are the people who run the drug war for
their own benefit. They created crack cocaine, They did it
so that they could fund their secret wars, and they're
doing regime change and overthrowing countries all the time. So yeah,
let's start cleaning house here. Localists cast out the log

(31:10):
and our I before we look at the smaller fractions
in other people's eyes.

Speaker 3 (31:15):
The real octo spook. Nigeria's population is roughly evenly split
between Muslims and Christians, with most estimates showing a slight
majority for Muslims. Yeah, so they have a target rich environment.
There's a lot of people for the Muslims to attack
TOFI tyrants seventeen seventy six. Of course, the Muslim terrorists
are murdering Christians in Nigeria are heavily armed while the

(31:36):
government disarms Christians.

Speaker 2 (31:38):
Yeah, well, you know the other part of this is
that nobody is accusing. Nobody is accusing the Christians of
mass murdering Muslims in Nigeria. Isn't that interesting? BBC doesn't
say that, Well, we kill on everybody. That's okay, you know,
as long as they're not singling people out and doing
it as a hate crime, because there's no hate in Islam, right,
It's just a religion of peace. That's okay, except it

(32:01):
seems to go in one direction, just like it does
in the UK. And the BBC always makes excuses and
lies about what's happening in the UK just the rest
of the government. Does you know, you get attacked by
multiple Muslims, you know, stabbing you with a knife and
all the rest of it, you're the one to blame
because you said something or gave them a look, and
you know it's your fault. And we have to apologize

(32:23):
to the Muslims for the distress that your speech or
your look gave them.

Speaker 4 (32:27):
Yeah, the violence we're seeing in the UK and the
massive violence we're seeing there is what you always see
when you have a large number of the Muslims. A
large percentage of the population is Muslim.

Speaker 2 (32:38):
That's right, that's right.

Speaker 3 (32:40):
We have hero May says I lost my job recently
and the snap thing was helping fill.

Speaker 2 (32:45):
In the gaps, just saying yes, that's right.

Speaker 3 (32:48):
Very sorry to hear you lost your job. You praying
and those in the audience please pray for hero May
to find a job.

Speaker 4 (32:55):
It is sometimes needed. I mean, I think the church
should be the one uh doing that, But it's like
I said, with the breadlines at a certain point where
they're just pushing everyone onto it. You can't avoid that.

Speaker 2 (33:11):
That's right, that's right. You know. The interesting thing too,
is that, you know, in terms of job losses and stuff,
the it's not just the people that were recently fired
in terms of the federal bureaucrats that are there, but
it's also the people that are still working, you know,
the people who are the flight controllers, TSA A lot
of people like that. They're showing up in mass at

(33:32):
the food banks trying to get food as well. So
this is coming at a very bad time, and it
is you know, everybody's pointing fingers at everybody else, but
it just shows the big finger is how dysfunctional. This
government is. They have told you that they will fix everything.
You know, every problem that we have needs to be
done by the federal government. And it needs to be

(33:55):
done by the government, and needs to be done not
even by the state or local government. It needs to
be done by the federal government. Well, this is what
that looks like.

Speaker 3 (34:02):
Yeah, threal octo spook. Muslims tolerate no other beliefs and
they must be converted or murdered. Yeah, once they reached
the saturation point in the population, they have no interest
in coexisting. It's going to be their way or the highway,
and you're going to get out of their way.

Speaker 2 (34:19):
Well, there's many different strains of Islam and so and
they do have different attitudes about that. And it is
interesting we see some individuals. It was a Christian testimony
I haven't gone over it yet from a woman who
was the daughter of one of the Hamas founders and
she became a Christian. A very interesting conversion story. And so,

(34:42):
you know, we want to understand this religion and not
embrace it. Understand the danger of it. We don't want
to be foolish about this, but we also need to
understand that it is more than anything. It is a
spiritual war that should be our primary orientation. You want
to disarm a Moss, convert them to Christianity. That's what

(35:03):
they really need. It's what Israel needs as well.

Speaker 3 (35:06):
So Soylent Goy says, a civil war seems contrived to me,
born of the propaganda created by the one percent. It's
not conservative versus progressive issue. It's in oligarchs versus ninety
nine percent issue, and that's what the one percent want
us to ignore.

Speaker 2 (35:21):
Well, I think there's a concerted effort. As a matter
of fact. I've got an op ed piece here when
we get into the class war, we get an OpEd
piece from Brandon Smith, and in it, I was very
disturbed to see how he was become kind of a
partisan tribalist. And I think that what is being done

(35:42):
by Trump and by the Democrats and by the people
who write about this stuff, I think they're carrying the
water of these people who want a civil war. You're right,
it is the oligarchs. It is the people in charge
who want to have the great reset, and one of
the ways that they do that is with a civil war.
You know, before we take a break, I want to
play for you while talking about Muslims and what's happening.

(36:03):
This is a call into a talk show in London.
A woman talking about what it's like to live in
these areas where the Muslims have come in in such
large numbers.

Speaker 5 (36:14):
I live in the borough right next to Hillingdon, yep,
and I moved into my house in twenty nineteen. My
local shops has been free stabbing. One murder since then.
My friend was murdered last year up on the high
Street and I was murdered in Southwall Park. The government

(36:34):
of failing us. I'm both scared but my children. I
have a twenty two year old son and I'm begging
him to move out of the country.

Speaker 6 (36:43):
Oh my goodness, me, what are these politicians do to us?

Speaker 5 (36:49):
They're putting a children in so much danger. They're putting
they're putting everyone in danger and they're not doing nothing
el past, and.

Speaker 6 (36:57):
That's been a lot of us feel you know how many?
How many is too many?

Speaker 5 (37:04):
They're pushing us. It's the plan do something that we
don't want to do. We are peaceful people, British people
never a vote against their government. Yeah, they're going to
push us through it because they're not listening to us.
Our friends, our family are dying. I had a cousin
murder twenty years ago who was sleep and nothing has.

Speaker 3 (37:25):
Changed to the I'm so so sorry, Sarah.

Speaker 1 (37:29):
I'm sure.

Speaker 6 (37:29):
I'm sure I speak for everyone listening and watching right now.
My heart goes out to you, and that's that's that's
the reality.

Speaker 5 (37:37):
I don't need the house without a man.

Speaker 6 (37:39):
You're that you're that worried when I know.

Speaker 5 (37:43):
It's getting stabbed. I'm thinking raped. In part, this is
where I live, not where the politics live.

Speaker 6 (37:53):
Do you think that's part of the issue that they
don't live in the real world, Karma.

Speaker 5 (38:00):
If you're listening to this, please do something.

Speaker 2 (38:03):
He knows exactly what this law.

Speaker 5 (38:07):
In my life, I've been a Laura Biden citizen, I've
been a civil servant. Please do something. Is ask dying
on the streets. You're talk about being racist. We're not racist.
This mixed race. I was a white child brought up
in a in a mixed race family. Nothing to do
with Brave exactly. Do you know with our.

Speaker 3 (38:28):
Safety, Sarah?

Speaker 6 (38:31):
I mean, we agree with you every every single word,
and I'm so sorry. I'm sending you a big hug
over the easter, and I'm sure everyone else.

Speaker 2 (38:41):
Is oh that ether. Yeah, look let's let's cause bade
a spade. We understand what's going on. This is a plan,
this is deliberate. They're deliberately looking the other way, and
if you complain about what's being done, they make you
the enemy. We've seen this over and over again in
the in Britain, and so yeah, we understand what's happening,

(39:05):
and they have their means to get everybody set against
each other. And the Muslims being brought into the EU
is a big part of it. Here. There's also you know,
the immigrants that are coming in.

Speaker 3 (39:18):
I also think it's important members just like yes, it
is again. You know, the oligarchs are the ones fomenting this,
but they have created a class of people that hate
you and despise you everything you stand for, everything you believe.

Speaker 2 (39:30):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (39:31):
These people hate They would sell you down the they
would throw you into a camp in a heartbeat. They
would co sign whatever the politicians, the elite want to
do to you.

Speaker 2 (39:40):
That's right. So it's important if you look at what
has been done with media and entertainment, it's the same
pattern I saw after World War two with Germans and Nazis. Okay,
they were always the villains about everything, and you couldn't
you couldn't hate them enough, right, they were always portrayed
as evil. That's what they're doing to white people in general.

(40:00):
And that's the purpose of post.

Speaker 3 (40:03):
World War two. As you said, almost every villain in
a movie, well now almost, but a vast number of
villains movies were Nazis. It was the worst thing you
could be. They were the most evil people to have
ever existed. And then they started calling everyone Nazis. Yeah,
they think it is okay under any circumstances. You just
see a guy walking down the street and he's got

(40:23):
a swastika somewhere on his body. You could kill that
guy and they would applaud you, no questions asked. And
that's how they view anyone with slightly right wing policies.

Speaker 2 (40:32):
Well, you don't have to have a swastik on it,
you just have to have white skin. Now, that's what
they have trained. That's what all the CRT stuff, the
Project sixteen nineteen was all about. That's what all this
rhetoric that they keep throwing to people training them in college.
Now in K through twelve they're training them to hate
anybody with white skin. This is something that Bill Ayers

(40:55):
and Burnadine Dorn, the Communists were doing this, the white
skin privilege. They began with this and then just became
white privilege. And this has been fostered throughout the schools.
But it is a that is their approach. Rather than
listening to people, this is their approach to bring in
dangerous groups and then support them and to protect them

(41:17):
and then to attack you.

Speaker 3 (41:18):
We'll be right back real quick. Sprumford, thank you very much.
That's very generous, big support. Thank you, God bless the
night family. Travis, thanks for mentioning the general hate of
israeliswards Christians. I've never understood the ignorant support of the
o G christ haters by Christians Zionis. Yeah, it's very
strange to me. And again, I don't want anything bad

(41:39):
to happen to the Israeli people. I want them to
find Christ. That's the best thing that can happen to anyone.
Their geographical issues are nothing compared to their spiritual issues.
That's a much.

Speaker 2 (41:51):
And yet when you look at the Christian Zionists, they
don't you know, they don't need Christ. They're Jewish. It's
their salvation by ethnicity.

Speaker 3 (41:58):
Their bloodline isn't going to do anything to say to them.

Speaker 2 (42:01):
And so they are anti Gospel, anti christ.

Speaker 3 (42:04):
Archie Mark, New Jersey. Wow, thank you for the support.
We're not gonna be able to get out for a break,
says if just war calls for ending war when the
enemy is repelled, and should in the US have ended
the war with Japan after midway, the Japanese were soundly
defeated and no longer a threat.

Speaker 2 (42:18):
I don't believe that the I don't believe that the
nuclear bombs dropped on civilians in Japan or justified, not
by any means at all. No, that's true. And if
the if their goal was to have complete capitulation and surrender,
they could have used those nuclear bombs against the Japanese soldiers.
They said, oh, I have to find them island by island. Well,

(42:39):
not if we got nukes, you know, And so there
was another way they could do this. A just war
does not target civilians, and so I do not agree
with what Truman did, But I don't agree with the
national security state. They created the CIA, the NSA, and
this whole idea of being the world's policeman. I think
he was one of our horrible presents. I don't think

(43:00):
it gets enough credit for how horrible he was. We
all talk about FDR and Woodrow Wilson, but he kind
of gets a pass, and he doesn't deserve to get
a pass. He was horrific. We'll be right back. You're

(44:47):
listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 7 (44:51):
Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelenski. I'm so tired of wearing
these same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
all the billions skimmed off America, I could dress better,
And I could if only David Knight would send me
one of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new
black T shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue. But

(45:14):
he told me to get lost. Maybe one of you
American suckers can buy me some At the David Knightshow
dot com. You should be able to buy me several hundred.
Those amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful. I'd
wear something other than green military cosplay to my various.

Speaker 8 (45:32):
Galas and social events.

Speaker 7 (45:34):
If you want to save on shipping, just put it
in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from
the USA.

Speaker 9 (45:51):
Tell Alexa to add the APS radio skill and have
access to the best channels anywhere from country to blues,
classic hits to news. Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for
you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio dot com.

Speaker 8 (46:07):
Now the Weather full cost with gretzits On bug.

Speaker 2 (46:11):
Hot. That was the weather with gretits On bug. Yeah.
If you want to scare somebody, that's the costume to wear.
She has probably scared more young children than Frankenstein, Dracula
Wolfman all combined. Yeah. Hot, Well, here's something you should
be afraid of, and that is the depopulation agenda that

(46:31):
is behind all this climate change. The climate mcguffin Paul
Erlick and his Land of the Living Dead. This is
an article from What's Up with That dot Com? I
said always wrong, but never end oubt. Doesn't that describe
these people of the climate alarmist. Welcome to the end

(46:53):
is always near world of Paul Erlick. We're humans of
the problem, or at least everyone that does not see
what the Neo Malthusians worn against the Land of the
Living Dead. Something to think about this Halloween, fifty years
after the publication of his controversial book The Population Bomb,
biologist Paul Airlick warns over population and over consumption are

(47:16):
still driving us over the edge. He's going to be
undeterred even when his billionaire backers like Bill Gates see
the handwriting on the wall understand that this position is
no longer tenable or even needed, because they now have
the health mcguffin that they can wage all these same
things against us and do real population reduction.

Speaker 3 (47:37):
This guy supposedly smart enough to see this problem coming
years back and write a book about it, can't tell
when people have had enough that's right, and the narrative
is shifting. This is supposedly one of our intelligentsia, one
of our big brains are thinkers.

Speaker 2 (47:54):
One of the experts out there. A shattering collapse of
civilization is a near certainty, he said decades ago. He
said this is going to happen in the next few decades.
And I can't tell you how many how this really
swept through high school. This happened in nineteen seventy and
I was in tenth grade. I tell you it was

(48:14):
completely bought, hook line and sinker by most of the
people that I knew, including my best friend who was
you know, Randy bought in all this stuff. Anyway, we
got too many people. There's just so many people, dude.
The humanity is continuing destruction of the natural world that
sustains all life on Earth, according to biologists, Professor Paul

(48:35):
Erlick Eric remains as outspoken as ever. The world's optimum
population is less than two billion people, he said, five
point six billion fewer than on the planet today, he argues,
and there's increasing toxfication of the entire planet by synthetic
chemicals that may be dangerous to people and wildlife then

(48:56):
may be more dangerous than the climate change. He predicted
that hundreds of millions of people are going to starve
to death and in the seventies, a fate that was
avoided by the green revolution and intensive agriculture. They say,
so this is where they say, yeah, we already we
saved everybody, so mission accomplished. It's not going to not

(49:18):
going to all die. Yeah. So that's part of what
Bill Gates is doing, is going to declare victory and
move on to the health attacks.

Speaker 3 (49:26):
That's the nice thing about not having a real enemy.
You get to decide when it's over. You need to
declare victory whatever point you wish.

Speaker 2 (49:34):
That's right. Yeah, if you were just jousting at windmills,
you can say, well, I kill the giants and.

Speaker 3 (49:39):
You're out there shadow boxing. You get to decide when
you've knocked the guy out.

Speaker 2 (49:42):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (49:43):
You need to give me your freedoms. You already owe
me for saving your life. But I hadn't been doing that,
you'd be dead.

Speaker 2 (49:51):
Many details and timings of the events were wrong. Paul
Erlick acknowledges that today, but he says the book was
correct overall. No, it wasn't. Growth, along with overconsumption per capita,
is driving civilization over the edge. Billions of people are
now hungry or micronutrient malnourished. Climate disruption is killing people.
The problem is that the real issue now is obesity

(50:15):
in the developed countries because of the kind of food
that we're eating. It is a near certainty in the
next few decades. He said. The risk is increasing continually
as long as perpetual growth of the human enterprise remains
the goal of economic and political systems. As I've said
many times, perpetual growth is the creed of the cancer cell.

(50:36):
And so he sees us as a cancer. He sees
humanity as a cancer, and when it was put out
by the Gaia theory, Gaia was mother Earth, a living
sentient organism, and human beings were the cancer.

Speaker 3 (50:52):
And you can see that in the matrix when agent
Smith is lecturing Morpheus.

Speaker 2 (50:57):
You know what I've decided, you are virus. High population,
high consumption by the affluent are driving a sixth mass
extinction of biodiversity upon which civilization depends for clean air, water,
and food. Well, what's he concerned about if we don't
have clean air, water and food. The people dyeing problems

(51:18):
solved right, Well, the Epstein emails are revealing a money
laundering probe that was taking place in the sex case.
And it's also showing that Acosta, Alex Acosta, the guy
that was the so called prosecutor and all this helped
to shut that down, lied about it at the time

(51:39):
and it's still lying about it. This is the guy
who was again the friend not just of Trump, Trump
put him in as Labor secretary. It's interesting how all
these strings keep tying Trump back to Epstein in one
way or another. Federal prosecutors expanded their probe into Epstein's
sex crimes in two thousand and seven to include potential

(52:01):
charges of money laundering, an effort that included an outreach
to one of the most important clients, according to documents
and emails from Epstein's personal Yahoo account, which they now
have obtained. Usually that's the way they go after people, right,
That's what they did with Dennis Haster, the pedophile that

(52:21):
the GOP selected, got him to run for Congress, and
then elevated him to Speaker of the House and kept
him longer than any other speaker. And it was the
money laundering issues, saying that he had structured his withdrawals
to avoid detection and that type of thing. But it
was also the way they went after al Capone, Right,

(52:43):
al Capone. They didn't get Alcopone for violating prohibition. They
got him for not paying his taxes. It's always the
financial crimes that they typically go after people for, except
with Jeffrey Epstein. Then they don't want to look at
the financial stuff. Don't show me the money. I don't
want to follow the money at all. The lead prosecutor
requested that a grand jury issue subpoenas for quote, every

(53:04):
financial transaction conducted by Epstein and his six businesses dating
to two thousand and three. The emails show prosecutors also
subpoened major banks for records about Epstein's accounts and financial activities.
According to two people familiar with the matter who asked
not to be identified to discuss a sensitive investigation, Marie

(53:26):
Villa Fauna, who was assistant US Attorney for the Southern
District Afford at the time, even contacted Epstein's longtime wealth
management client, Les Wexner, the Victoria's secret guy, about the investigation.
According to documents and emails. The previously unreported details of
financial crimes probe were contained in a trove of eighteen

(53:48):
thousand emails from Epstein's private Yahoo email account obtained by Bloomberg.
It also includes Epstein's aggrieved typo leyden missives about the
investigation to fens and business associates, including former chief officer
executive officer of the investment bank bear Stearns. The money

(54:08):
laundering probe adds a new layer to the narrative about
how the government conducted its investigation into Epstein. It also
raises questions about what evidence prosecutors may have gathered as
they followed Epstein's money long before the public began demanding
a full accounting of this case. A financial aspect also
puts the spotlight on Alex Acosta, former US Attorney for

(54:31):
the Southern District of Florida, who signed off on the
Epstein deal. Again, Trump picked him for Labor secretary. And
there's what was it ninety two to ninety four people
who have that same title in various districts around the country.
What was it that distinguished Alex A. Costa from the
other ninety plus people that were out there to have

(54:53):
Trump put him in as secretary of labor. He had
no experience in labor relations, not as a corporate corporate person,
not as a union person. But he was just this
attorney that had connections to Epstein. Last month, the Costa
tobea House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. They didn't
recall any discussion of political financial crimes as part of

(55:15):
his offices Epstein investigation. Yet emails and documents from Epstein's
Yahoo account show the prosecutors in his office discussed the
financial crimes component of the investigation with Acosta and copied
him on correspondence about it. Records obtained as part of
the money laundering probe were stored in the US attorney's office,

(55:38):
and a folder titled money Laundering, which contains attorney research
and handwritten notes, according to a partial list of the
government's evidence that was filed in a related court proceeding,
So he would be lying about that. Ron Wyden said
in the statement of Bloomberg that quote money laundering charges
surely would have been a centerpiece of any serious prosecution

(56:01):
aimed at bringing Epstein down for good. Yeah, because that's
what they always do, Like I said, Dennis Haster, al Capone,
you name it. That's one of the easiest things for
them to do, to come after people for financial crimes.
I'm not saying that's justified. I'm just saying that's a
trap that they've laid for everybody, and they typically make
that a big part of the peace there. He added,

(56:22):
the decision to drop the federal money laundering cases part
of the government's non prosecution agreement was quote a staggering
miscarriage of justice. These new details only raise additional questions
about alex Acosta's truthfulness. That's right, another person in the
Trump sphere lying to us about this stuff. And by

(56:44):
the way, you know, as we keep seeing this fall
by Prince Andrew, I should say the man formerly known
as Prince More stuff is coming out of Royal historian
Andrew Lowney told The Daily Mail that Andrew had forty
prostitutes brought into his five star hotel in just four
days during taxpayer funded trip to Thailand.

Speaker 3 (57:07):
This made me absolutely positive they are keeping some secret
medical technology from us because the fact the Royal family
hasn't dropped dead of some new bizarre std Yeah, that's
right after something like this, or just.

Speaker 2 (57:21):
Dropped dead from a heart attack. Forty prostitutes in four days, Yeah,
Andrew mount Batton, I guess I give a whole new
meaning to that word has no moral boundaries, and he
exploited his role as trade envoy to line his pockets
and to chase women, said the Royal historian Andrew Lowney.

(57:44):
He said the taxpayers funded his trip to Thailand, where
he instead of staying in the embassy. This is supposedly
about trade or something like that, but instead of staying
in the embassy, he demanded that they pay for a
five star hotel for him, and then demanded that they
pay for forty prostitutes to be brought in over four days.

(58:05):
Charles had advised against giving Andrew the trade envoy roll
in two thousand and one. I wonder if there's a
record of that, or if they're just trying to help
to distance Charles from his brother all of this. In
two thousand and he warned against it. He said He'll
just chase women and play golf. Lowney claims that Charles

(58:27):
was overruled by then Prime Minister Tony Blair and his
ally Peter Mandelssohn, because there is no love for Tony
Blair in the UK, so they can shift the blame
from the Windsor family to Blair, and that's what they're
trying to do. But again, this just underscores how tone
deaf Trump is about this whole thing. He embraces it,

(58:49):
and the more he embraces us cover up, the more
you see how the people that he has brought in
around him were all a part of this Epstein sphere,
just like alex Acosta, the so called prosecutor, and then
people like Alan Dershowitz, who was the defense attorney of Epstein,
and Ken Starr, who, as I've said many times, I

(59:10):
believe that what he did for Jeffrey Epstein was the
same thing they did for Bill Clinton. Ken Starr was
supposedly this conservative Christian, right wing prosecutor is going to
come after everybody, and yet his entire career was to
cover for sexual predators. So Uber has a vision of

(59:31):
a dark, driverless future, a glimpse into the globalist control grid. Right.
This is an article from based Underground dot com. I've
talked about this for the longest time. There's a different
CEO now at Uber again, somebody not from America. I
can't even begin to guess how would pronounce that name there.

Speaker 3 (59:53):
But data kas Rolshahi.

Speaker 2 (59:57):
I don't know, and I don't know what ethnic group
that it is. But you know, the previous CEO was
Travis Kalalnik, and he was very upfront about the fact
that he said, we have to replace that other dude
in the car. That's why you draw your taxi. Your
Uber drives are so expensive, is because that other dude
in the car. Well, that's not it at all. You

(01:00:18):
can just wait until they get rid of the people
who are driving the cars and look at how much
they go up on the Uber prices. But the whole
point of Uber was to set up a driverless future
and a globeless control grid. The guy who was the
CEO of Lyft wrote a long op ed piece. He
was trained as an urban planner. Urban planners love cities,

(01:00:43):
and urban planners who love cities hate cars. And that's
what he said. He said, the city is the greatest
invention of mankind and the car is the worst invention.
And he got that exactly the opposite way. The cars
gave us mobility and freedom, and city control give us
a control grid. That's what these guys ultimately about.

Speaker 3 (01:01:05):
He's Iranian by Oh, okay, he's an Iranian man.

Speaker 2 (01:01:09):
Okay, Well, he wants to run all of our all
of our transportation. And so anyway, they're going.

Speaker 3 (01:01:18):
About Travis Khalalnik. He's a last thing I saw about him.
He was talking to AI and talking about how he thought,
oh yeah, I'm really gonna be able to use this
to make some breakthrough in physics, and it's really smart.
I wouldn't be surprised if we see Travis Khalalnik in
a psych ward at some point because the AI A
the AI broke his mind.

Speaker 2 (01:01:40):
Yeah, he's one of these people that has been taken
in by the scam. Well, let's we're gonna take a
quick break and as we go out, we had some
interesting things that happened over the.

Speaker 3 (01:01:52):
We also have a lot of comments.

Speaker 2 (01:01:53):
Well, oh, I go ahead and do the comments. Big
brit Is.

Speaker 3 (01:01:56):
Back again, says ten people were stabbed on a train
in the UK during the weekend.

Speaker 2 (01:02:00):
Yes, that's right, that's right. I think I had the well,
I don't think I've got that in the thing.

Speaker 4 (01:02:06):
Here, But this was about the woman prime the well.

Speaker 2 (01:02:10):
She was in response to that, she was saying, it's
so bad, let me tell you my personal experience. But yeah,
there was the video of people running down the side
of the train trying to flee the person was stabbing them.

Speaker 3 (01:02:22):
We also have Hero May says they need guns, get
a three D printer or something. There comes a point where, yeah,
you know, if your options are death or deal with
the consequences of what the government is going to do
to you for defending yourself, you know you got to
weigh those options.

Speaker 4 (01:02:38):
Yeah, I was going to just saying I can't leave
the house without a man, and of course they can't
have any kind of personal protection. You couldn't carry a
hammer in Britain, that's right, unless, of course you're a
Muslim that's out there to use it. If you're there
to protect yourself. It's like that quote you use often,
Travis of the Your punishment for carrying a knife is

(01:02:59):
going to be different from the criminal's punishment under these
authoritarian rules.

Speaker 5 (01:03:03):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:03:03):
Well, just like what they tried to do that fifteen
year old Scottish girl when she's being harassed by that guy,
and you know, she said, I haven't got protection. She
shows what was it she had. She had a hatchet.

Speaker 3 (01:03:14):
I think she had a hatchet and a knife.

Speaker 2 (01:03:16):
Yeah, so they came after her. Okay, back off or
I'm going to use this. And she didn't threaten him,
she didn't come after him. She just shut I've got
I'm armed, don't protect myself. They came after her.

Speaker 3 (01:03:28):
Yeah, Assyrian girl says, I feel really, I really feel old.
I really feel for old folks who are still living
in the house or neighborhood where they always lived and
don't have the resources to move out. God please help us. Yeah,
there's a lot of people who are in that exact
scenario you described, where that's just been their home and
the neighborhood has changed around them to the point where

(01:03:48):
it is unsafe for them, where every day is just
a matter of am I going to get assaulted? Am
I going to get stabbed? Is someone going to kick
down the door of my home?

Speaker 2 (01:03:56):
Yeah, and just it's really sad.

Speaker 3 (01:03:58):
That's right, Fuzzy Mateo. You've been to Minneapolis, late Minneapolis lately.
It's going on here too. Don't fool yourself that somehow
the US doesn't have to deal with this. Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:04:07):
Yeah, that's a little mogod issue with a top of
people who live there talk about that, and that's the
political base of ohan Omar, the Marxist Muslim. Yeah, everybody's
freaking out about Mom, Danny and everything, but you know
ohan Omar, she's she's connected to this smiling crime ring. Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:04:26):
We are being overrun and it's not just happening in Minneapolis.
It's also happening in Texas as well. We've talked about that,
how they're building all this. They want to build their
own little compound city where it's you know, all Muslim
all the time. Mark Young twelve. That woman is what
gun control sounds like again, the woman crying on the

(01:04:47):
phone as she discusses the violence that she fears every
single day. Yes, Guard Goldsmith, good to see your garden.
Of course, Guard hosts Liberty Conspiracy, which you can find
at six pm on Rumble, so go check. Guard Goldsmith
out says the very concept of over consumption quote unquote
has a Marxist route, good point, applying arbitrary claims over others,

(01:05:07):
others who have to determine for themselves in a market
how much they want to consume based on price.

Speaker 2 (01:05:12):
Yeah, the Marxists are going to be there to re
distribute the wealth, and they're going to do it equitably
all to themselves.

Speaker 3 (01:05:18):
Well, you see, we're post scarcity, but only if you
put me in charge and being allocate where everything goes.
Guard Goldsmith also says higher consumption leads to higher price
leads to either conservation or new development.

Speaker 2 (01:05:30):
I'm right, there's a market mechanism for it. Well. Of course,
over the weekend we had the Halloween stuff and they
had the Great Gatsby ball. We're going to talk about
that when we come back. They make America Great Gatsby
again in a kind of nineteen twenties, out of touch
elite decadents that we see at mar A Lago. But
people are also making fun of JD. Vance And you

(01:05:53):
know this is if you've seen this meme of jda
Evans with a bloated face and this there straight ahead.
So these jd Vance meme are everywhere, and so jd
Vance decided that he would own it and make fun
of himself. And this is what he put out over
the weekend.

Speaker 4 (01:06:12):
Happy Halloween kids, and remember say thank you.

Speaker 2 (01:06:19):
So. Yeah, he has one skill that Trump does not have,
and that is self deprecating humor. But other people have
the humor.

Speaker 3 (01:06:26):
That makes JD Vance much more dangerous Donald Trump could
ever really be.

Speaker 2 (01:06:31):
That's right, That's right.

Speaker 3 (01:06:32):
Jd Vance is actually kind of likable if you don't
pay attention to who funds him and who he surrounds
himself with. You see a clip of jd Vance, You're like,
oh wow, he seems like somebody I could get along with.

Speaker 2 (01:06:41):
Yeah, very articulate, great great debater that time thing. He
is a dangerous person because of the teal connection and
other things like that, and because he is so adept
at communication. But Donald Trump, even though he doesn't like
to make fun of himself, other people do. This is
spitting image and they have a doctor jerkyl and mister Hyde.

Speaker 10 (01:07:08):
It's Halloween, my favorite time of the year. But I
don't like skeletons, particularly the ones in my closet.

Speaker 11 (01:07:14):
They're nasty, they certainly I President jerk Ill. President Jerkill,
folks are spending feathers about you bring a maid man
killing them there Venezuelan's I subduct the people on the
street and you refusing to release them. Epstein files.

Speaker 10 (01:07:30):
Those are all bad, so bad.

Speaker 11 (01:07:32):
And then there's they're sanctions, the personal vend at us
martial law.

Speaker 2 (01:07:36):
I get a JD.

Speaker 10 (01:07:37):
I'm not as bad as they could be. Sad people
really hate.

Speaker 8 (01:07:41):
You're not going to sit out in the East wing, sir,
I know.

Speaker 10 (01:07:43):
But things need to get far worse and right away.
Bring me my potion.

Speaker 11 (01:07:48):
You're a win potion, sir.

Speaker 2 (01:07:50):
Thanks Suki.

Speaker 10 (01:07:54):
Okay, Well is it, sir?

Speaker 2 (01:07:58):
What's that fruit? That's sir?

Speaker 10 (01:08:00):
Changing becoming or petty even more of a jerk crueler.
Everybody's saying it.

Speaker 11 (01:08:07):
By the way, President jerk Ill, No.

Speaker 10 (01:08:10):
I am President Hyde. Take this down, round up all
Canadians and turn them in a bacon and say how
they like it. Crucify sleepy Joe Biden on the Statue
of Liberty and judging for the nails and castraate anyone
who didn't vote for me, including Millennia, get ready to
run for my third, fourth, and fifth term, and no

(01:08:31):
Caracus twice.

Speaker 11 (01:08:35):
President High you call mina and a grizzly in a
ten house, And what about the East Wing?

Speaker 10 (01:08:42):
When it comes to total mindless destruction, there's only one
man I can turn to.

Speaker 2 (01:08:48):
I am baby Hellraiser, mister Haleraser.

Speaker 10 (01:08:55):
You've raised the West Bank, and you do the same
with my east wing.

Speaker 4 (01:08:59):
The suffer is sweet sweet suppery.

Speaker 2 (01:09:02):
Shall I destroy before the next correspondence.

Speaker 10 (01:09:05):
Ball, No, Jerry try, My potion.

Speaker 2 (01:09:13):
Needs more evil. Yeah, well, you know Trump might be
just the guy for that. He was the one who
said we'll send them in guns a blazing. How sweet
that'll be. You know, he just knows that doesn't Well,
we're gonna take a quick break. We'll be right back.

(01:09:34):
I was working on the news. The lady one guy
for my eyes beheld and recited for the monster's head rehearse.
To my surprise, the tactics to inject what they divide.
The monster is the jab, the spike's a graveyard stand

(01:09:56):
I caught on, and a fly is the jab. The
monster is the jazz from the dark labs in the
cattle east to the FDA where farm of vampires feast.
The cools rehearsed before nine to one. One had to
poison us, which is what they've done.

Speaker 4 (01:10:16):
Feature.

Speaker 2 (01:10:17):
The monster is the Jazz teacher. The spikes of the
graveyard stands now put you on a slab. The monster
is the Jab. Big Pharma was having fun. The party
had just begun. The guests included Fauci Donald. Then by

(01:10:41):
then the scene was a lockdown. All we're fearing the
news supply chains were broken. We were singing the blues.
The coffins, they told us, were about to drive. You
can see it all on Channel five. The monster is
the Jaz Jab. The spikes a graveyard stand. It'll put

(01:11:05):
you on a slab. It is the Jab. The monster
is the Jab. From the Oval office, his voice did ring.
Hospital cash registers went a ching. When people caught on
to keep on the lift, they said, whatever happened to
the wuhand Lab is the Jab. The monster is the

(01:11:27):
Jaz monster Jack, the spikes a graveyard stand, He'll put
you on a slab. The job. The monster is the Jab.
Now a very hings cool Lively's part of the plan.
Their alibi echoes throughout the land for you the living,
and they will try it again when they get to

(01:11:49):
your door. Tell Big Pharma, no mars jab. The monster
is the jaz jat the spikes a graveyard stands. It'll
bit you on a slab.

Speaker 10 (01:12:03):
Jab.

Speaker 2 (01:12:04):
The monster is the job.

Speaker 8 (01:12:11):
You wait a minute, Where am I sorry?

Speaker 12 (01:12:30):
Jefferson. The scoundrels who put America on Central Bank Fiat
currency used our heads on their coins as some sort
of trophy. Despicable.

Speaker 13 (01:12:39):
This is outrageous, Washington. I spent my life fighting centralized power.
Now the Federal Reserve monopoly parades us around on their
monopoly money.

Speaker 8 (01:12:49):
Tell me there's some good news to all this.

Speaker 12 (01:12:52):
Well, there is a coin they can't control, one that
isn't backed by the FED, but backed by the fed
up the All New David Knight Show comemor Raative coin.
But now patriots can support a show that won't sell
out with a limited edition coin that's sure to sell
out quickly.

Speaker 14 (01:13:07):
They say, money talks, and this coin has something worth
listening to. The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.

Speaker 2 (01:14:08):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 3 (01:14:15):
Welcome back, folks. Got some comments here Jerry Alatalo says,
poor ex Prince Andrew can no longer wear his gaudy
fake military uniform around with medals and now has to
live in a countryside dump of a house. I know,
I feel so.

Speaker 2 (01:14:28):
I don't know how many rooms system's got. I mean,
they got kicked out of the thirty one room mansion.

Speaker 3 (01:14:32):
Surely he couldn't get forty prostitutes into his new home.
That's going to be a struggle.

Speaker 2 (01:14:38):
Yeah, with thirty one rooms, you get put a price
suit in almost every room, and they have a couple left.

Speaker 3 (01:14:42):
Over, especially since I mean it was forty over a
few days, so average outs like ten a day. You
easily fit ten prostitutes into a thirty one room home.

Speaker 2 (01:14:51):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (01:14:51):
They wouldn't even have to see each other OUTI Mr
r Trump's approval ratings are in the toilet, but he
seemingly doesn't give a crap.

Speaker 2 (01:15:00):
Is that the marble toilet in the Lincoln bathroom that
it's in the toilet of. I don't know.

Speaker 3 (01:15:06):
Real Hocto spooks as I hope we see more of
that from Lance talking about the monster Jeb.

Speaker 2 (01:15:12):
We're going to try to do that a little bit
more regular basis. Here, the question is are Democrats trying
to start a civil war? Well, of course they are,
and so is Trump. Right, both of them are trying
to do this. This is from Brandon Smith, and I've
interviewed Brandon, I've covered many of his articles in the past.
I was kind of surprised, though, by his take on this.

(01:15:33):
There's this partisan trap that everybody seems to be falling into,
and I think Brandon has stepped in it as well.
He says, whenever you delve into the modern history of
international of internal national conflict, you're bound to come across
post crisis accounts from people who said we never saw
it coming, or the violence hit us from nowhere. Generally speaking,

(01:15:55):
these were the people who weren't paying attention. They just
happened to survive by sheer luck. I would say that
maybe they weren't paying attention because they were caught up
in a partisan cult like mentality. He said, I think
this dynamic a lot of days when I see a
large contingent of American society, perhaps twenty five percent of

(01:16:17):
the population, which has been radicalized or brainwashed beyond all
reason or repair. I would agree with that, But then
he sees this as only a left thing. I would
agree with him. It's probably about twenty five percent of
the people who are hardcore Democrat propagandized cult members. But
I would say there's easily another twenty five percent of

(01:16:37):
people who are the same on the other side, on
the Maga side. He said these people, and he puts leftists,
But I would also say magists as well operate deep
within a protective bubble of propaganda and zelotry. Is that
not true of the Migao people as well? They function
within a hive mind that does not deviate from the

(01:16:58):
demands of their gatekeepers. They cannot be reasoned with, nor
that can they be satisfied. And then it's really their
leaders who lust for power and the suffering of anyone
who opposes them. Is this not the Trump administration? You know?
We look at things like the Epstein files, We look
at what Trump has done on Snap. He has basically

(01:17:21):
played himself into their hands. He has shot himself in
the foot, and I think this weekend shows it better
than any other time. Anybody that wants to think that
Trump is a master four D chess player, you must
have been completely asleep.

Speaker 3 (01:17:38):
The best shot went right through, clean, very clean.

Speaker 2 (01:17:42):
Yeah, it truly was. I mean, you know, while he
is saying that there is no way they can release
emergency funds from the USDA, think about this is the
guy for whom everything, everything is an emergency, except when
you got children on welfare food, which is not any
fault of their owns. It's their parents' fault, if you
want to put it that way. But it's not necessarily

(01:18:06):
When we look at this again, we have and I'm
talking about the people who have been on this incessantly,
not the people who are on it temporarily because of
circumstances and life circumstances and life can overwhelm all of us.
I would say, at one point in my life, I
was pretty arrogant about that type of thing, and God
gave me some life examples to show me that can

(01:18:28):
happen to anybody. But I don't tell any of people
who say that will never happen to me. Right, These
are the same people who think that. In a sense,
they think they're never going to die as well. But
apart from that, you know, when you look at what
is going on with this, and he's just going to
cut off these kids and cut off these people who
basically have become dependent on this, and he's got to

(01:18:51):
know how this is going to look. He's got to
know how it's going to be used by his opponents,
but he does it anyway, and then he doubles down
with a great Gadsby party on Friday, the night before
he's going to cut off all of the food stamps
the Snap program. Just amazing to me, How could you
be any dumber than that? But it's just that he doesn't.

(01:19:11):
He thinks that it's not that he's dumb. He just
is thinking that the people who follow him are that
dumb and that tribal. As he points out, he said,
you know, I could shoot somebody on Fifth Avenue, they
still vote for me. And as Michael Keaton point out,
he says, he's telling you you're stupid when he says that,
and that's really what he thinks. I think one can see.

(01:19:33):
Getting back to the Brandon Smith, he says, one can
see the immediate difference between the sides. Conservatives are so
independent that we fight constantly. You might agree on basic values,
but in terms of policy and action, we rarely shake hands.
But he says, for the political left, any disagreement with
the majority leads to immediate ostracism. I would say that

(01:19:54):
that is not what we see anymore with the Maga equation. Now,
it isn't about principles, it's not about conservative values. It's
not about the constitution or the rule of law. It's
about loyalty to Trump. And just like these people on
the left, you must be loyal to their DEI agenda
or their LGBT agenda or their CRT agenda. And if

(01:20:17):
you're not, you have to be ostracized, and you have
to be anti racist. You can't just not be racist.
You have to oppose yourself and like these communist struggle sessions.
But the same thing is demanded on the right. You know,
you just can't not be a leftist. You must be
anti anti leftists right and all this, and you must

(01:20:41):
be anti against more importantly, it's not about the philosophies.
It's about you've got to be anti against anybody who
doesn't love Trump. So you must declare your loyalty and
love of Trump. And then if you don't do that,
and if you don't hate anybody that you say has
Trump arrangement syndrome, they'll come after you. That is the
delusion of the right, the Trump delusional syndrome on the right,

(01:21:05):
and so ostracism. That's what these hive minds demand. They
do not tolerate individual rebellion, they do not tolerate debate.
They don't care about issues on the right either. The
question is can communists a version be defeated without using
authoritarian measures? He says, is a constitutional republic equipped to

(01:21:29):
deal with this kind of threat. Let me just say, Brandon,
we long ago passed that question because the you know what,
this is what the technocrats are saying, Well, we have
to have we want to have a libertarian society, but
we're going to have to have a benevolent dictator who's
going to do it. That's why they call it the
dark Enlightenment. You know, we're going to have to go

(01:21:49):
dark here, and we're going to have to have an
authoritarian who's going to lead us there. So that's what
he's saying. He said, you know, maybe these guys are
so bad, we're going to have to go through a
period of dictatorship. That's what they want you to think.
They don't realize. And it is kind of interesting because
Brandon has made a study of the left and What

(01:22:10):
he seems to have missed is the whole idea that
major tactic of the left has been to goad people
on the right into a reactionary dictatorship. This is a
stated goal of people like the Bottom minehoff Gang and
the Red Brigade in Germany and Italy. We later found

(01:22:31):
out that was Operation Gladiol that was actually being run
by NATO. But what they said when they were shooting
people in the streets, particularly CEOs of corporations, they said,
we want this to get bad enough. We're engaging in
terrorism because we want the government to overreact to terrorism. Okay,
the kind of stuff that you see being done now

(01:22:52):
with ice and all the rest of these things. So
we create a problem, and we want the government to
overreact to that problem in a way that going to
become dictators and then people will revolt against the fascist dictator,
and then that's our opportunity to step in. You see
how that works, the one two step. I mean, come on,
wake up. This is NATO that was doing this. But

(01:23:15):
it's also what the Marxists want to do. They want
to have terrorism because they want to bring to power
a right wing, fascist, authoritarian government, which is why he's saying, well,
you know, maybe we need to have that. Maybe there's
no way to get these leftists in line unless we
have some kind of an authoritarian fascist government. And then
when you do that, that paves the way for these

(01:23:36):
people to come in. And he says, is the constitutional
republic equipped to deal with this kind of threat when
somebody who wages warn your society internally? Is there a
way to fight them while remaining civic minded? Probably not.
This is the excuse that he's giving that'll be used
for the people say, yeah, that's why we're going to
get rid of the rule of law. We've got to

(01:23:57):
suspend the constitution and we have to do it. I
don't know how long, but we'll bring it back someday.
Guess what, you get rid of it never coming back.
Most of it's gone anyway, But now that they make
a pretense of lip service to it, so you get
rid of the rule of law so you can get
rid of your enemies. Is that not the group think
of the right that he is reflecting right now? It
absolutely is. I couldn't believe it when he put this

(01:24:18):
stuff in. I mean, I really thought he had more
discernment than this. What we're witnessing in the US and
Europe today is in every way a Marxist communist insurgency.
I agree. And yet it was a false flag Marxist
communist insurgency that was doing this, that was being run
by NATO and Operation Gladio. He said, now we see

(01:24:39):
the you know, now we see the authoritarian reactionary disaster
that they wanted. It's now come to fruition. And he
got people, even people who were students of history who
don't see this. Whenever activists cause harm or death, he says,
the media and the political leaders immediately moved to defend
that action. Now, the right what that looks like is

(01:25:00):
whenever the law enforcement people create harm or death, immediately
the right wing comes in to defend them and says
we have to do that because the radical leftists, you
should always support the law enforcement officers no matter what
they do. I mean, over the weekend, these people are
out there just to show that it's a game to them.

(01:25:21):
I guess they were wearing these ice guys who are
instead of wearing their usual masks, they put on Halloween mask.
You know, so they're going to attack people wearing Halloween mask.
It's just disgusting. I'm absolutely disgusted with these people. When
asked why Democrats are continuing down the path of militancy,
the response is that Trump is a dictator and a fascist.

(01:25:43):
Yet these same people seem to come up with a
single legitimate example of how Trump is acting like a dictator. Hey, Brandon,
I can. I've got a long list of what he's doing.
If you think that getting read of the constitutional Republic
is a dictatorship, We've got a long list. So he goes,

(01:26:06):
how about using the National Guard in US cities? Well,
you have to do it because they're disrupting ICE operations.
What is ICE doing that people are pushing back on?
Is there anything that the federal government could do that?
If that, people should not engage in civil disobedience against
I absolutely disagree with him. They have destroyed the rule
of law. I mean, just like posse committatis for example.

(01:26:29):
We know how this works. So anyway, then he cheers
the drug war, which is truly amazing US troops when
they're killing people in Venezuela, they're just countering drug smugglers.
And this is all being blown out of proportion by Democrats.
You know what's being blown out of proportion. Are people's
boats in their lives without any due process? You cheer?

(01:26:53):
You have the audacity to chair extra judicial killings like this.
What does it matter with you? This talk about a
hive mind. It's taken over people who used to be rational,
like Brandon Smith. I can't believe it. Just amazing to me.
Take this thing to the logical extreme. The drug war,
the UN drug war. Do you realize that's where it

(01:27:15):
came from, Brandon, It came from the UN. Do you
realize it's never worked? Do you realize what it has
done to the rule of law, How they have used
it as an excuse to militarize the police, to destroy
the Bill of Rights and due process. It's just amazing.
And now they want to use it for n actual
war and it's not going to accomplish. You see all
this stuff happening because people still got glassy eyes saying, yeah,

(01:27:38):
we've got to stop drug use. I agree, but you
don't do it this way. I never needed the DEA
to get me off of drugs, to stop me from
using drugs. I stopped it myself. And it's an educational issue.
It's a spiritual issue. It's not a law enforcement issue.
Trump is already being held accountable for a prolonged shutdown

(01:27:59):
of EBT, you know, the snap stuff. Well, I just
got to say how disingenuous it is for the Trump
administration to invent emergency after emergency after emergency so that
he can act like a dictator and avoid the rule
of law. But then when there is a situation like this,
he says, no, I can't release those emergency funds. That's

(01:28:21):
what they're there for. He can't help the farmers, he
can't help the people who are on food stamps in
the US. But he can certainly help Javier Malay and
Argentina because they are the buddies. They party together and
things like that. So that's a top priority for him.
They get on that right away. But you know, when

(01:28:41):
it comes to a problem that affects farmers or the
poor people on welfare, you can't think about that right now. Yeah,
we'll get to that later on, but it's not an emergency.
So they fought it. They said, legally, we can't do it.
When have you ever heard Trump in this administration saying
I don't think legally I can do that. That's never
an issue. Whenever there's a law against something. He declares

(01:29:04):
an emergency and does what he wants to do, except
this time, when it's a real emergency, he says, I
can't do anything because the law is there. So it's
just unbelievably disingenuous. So the Democrats are pouncing on Trump
for his completely blind he doesn't realize how people are

(01:29:26):
going to take this, or maybe he just doesn't care. Right,
it's like shooting somebody on Fifth Avenue. It's great gaspy
party that he had on Friday night, and you've got
people like Newsom. I mean, please don't put Newsom in
office by your idiotic actions, saying that Trump just doesn't
care about you. Right, he doesn't give a damn about you.

(01:29:47):
It's what he said, and that's what it looks like
to everybody. I think it's I think that is true. Actually,
so he's tone deaf, it's bad optics, and he's absolutely
blind to how everybody sees it. Democrats pounced on Saturday's
photos emerged from Trump's lavish Halloween Great Gasby theme party
at mar Lago, where they deemed tasteless on the event

(01:30:11):
of snap benefits running out for millions. Yeah, you'll never
hear the end of this, by the way, and I
think rightfully, so you know this is going to be
featured and all of their campaign videos is going to
go over and over and over again.

Speaker 3 (01:30:25):
Because wary Donald Trump thinks you should be allowed to
eat cake.

Speaker 2 (01:30:29):
Yeah, yeah, all the way through. Everybody's referring to that.
You know, the contrast of the decadent opulence of the
French Revolution and the decadent opulence even of the Great
Gasby situation. That was even the way that the author
described it, f Scott Fitzgerald when he wrote about what

(01:30:50):
he was when it kind of summarized what he was
writing about in Great Gasby, he said they were careless people.
They smashed up things and creatures and then retreat back
into their money or their vast carelessness or whatever it was.
They kept them together and they let other people clean
up the mess that they had made. But if that
doesn't describe Trump and his billionaire cronies, what does this

(01:31:15):
only fitting that they would be so arrogant and isolated
from everybody else that these elitists you want to talk about,
the elitists running the world. Okay, here they are right here, folks. Amgill,
wake up and take a look at this, and so again,
Gavin Newsom says, having a great gasby party while snap

(01:31:36):
benefits are about to disappear for forty two million Americans,
he doesn't give a damn about you. And that is
absolutely right. And then you know what he was doing
on Friday was he was focusing on the renovation of
the Lincoln bedroom bathroom and all marble renovation of the bathroom.

(01:31:56):
He said, I renovated the Lincoln bathroom in the White House.
It was renovating eighteen forties in an Art Deco green style,
totally inappropriate for the Lincoln era. I did it in
black and white polish statutory of marble. So he's very
proud of that. It's kind of you know, what was
happening with the Charlie Kirk thing. You know, reporters ask

(01:32:17):
him and say what do you think about Charlie Kirk
after he was murdered. He says, oh, that was horrible.
Oh by the way, have you heard about the ballroom
that I'm doing. I mean it's like yeah, oh no.
But meanwhile, you know, anyway, as Jeremy Clarkson would say,
so they would crash and go oh no, well anyway,

(01:32:37):
and that's the way he's doing it with this as.

Speaker 3 (01:32:39):
Well, and on that crushing disappointment.

Speaker 2 (01:32:42):
That's right. Another person, Democrat commentator said this is very
on brand for him. Absolutely is. So the question is,
you know, we want to get people off of welfare. Okay,
But again everything that he does, and he does it
col turkey. You know, we let we let these people

(01:33:04):
set up these supply chains that are stretched all over
the world and so forth, and it evolves into that
you can't change that. I understand the issue of having
shorter supply chains for national security and other things like that.
We want to have jobs here at home. There's a
lot of different things that could be done. As I said,
you want more jobs here at home. Get the foot
of government off the neck of the businesses. It's the regulation.

(01:33:26):
It's the taxes that are killing us more than foreign competition.
The biggest problem that you had learned this from growing
up in my home, where we had everybody had a business.
They were always they weren't talking about the competition. They
were always talking about the oppression from government and how
difficult government was making it, constantly adding more and more
burdens and regulations to make it impossible to do business.

(01:33:49):
So that's the real issue. You know, we have the
enemy are us. The enemy is the US government, and
they need to do something about that. And when you
look at the bigger part of the issue, you know
what they have done in terms of you know, Lennon
Johnson's Great Society. I hate it when people use great.
It seems like it always that ought to be gr

(01:34:11):
ate But anyway, what he's done is he's created this
vast welfare state of forty two million people. And they
had to look at the government's role in creating this
and then orderly with an orderly transition and a path
for people to be able to do this, rather than

(01:34:32):
Trump's role is just to come in and kneecap everything
and everybody cut it all off all at once. That
kind of abrupt movement is just total chaos, and even
worse to say, well, we're going to stop this and
then we're going to start this other thing. That he
doesn't start the other thing, then he changes it like
he's doing with the tariffs. That in decision is the

(01:34:53):
worst aspect of it. The only people who were positive
about this was News Nation, their White House correspondent. And
remember when they put out the rules for coverage of
the Pentagon. News Nation was the only one that said
that they would sign that rule. And so here they are, sir, yes, sir,

(01:35:13):
how high so sick of it again? It was a little party,
never killed anybody, right, And of course they will not
criticize News Nation, will not criticize Trump when he does
kill people, when he does blow up people and ships
real quickly.

Speaker 3 (01:35:30):
I just want to say it's important to acknowledge that
there are two separate reasons people are looking at this
and saying this is tasteless. There's this Marxist grasping envy
of you're taking my free stuff while you're rich, give
me your money, which is important not to give into that.
It's important to realize that you can be upset about

(01:35:51):
him wrecking the economy through his policies making it impossible
for people to earn a good living and then flaunting
this in their face.

Speaker 2 (01:36:00):
And all he's doing is he is building up the
Marxists who wanted to take everything from us. He's building
up Newsome, and he's building up the opposition. We know
what they want to do, and it's horrible. And with
this kind with the optics and with his abrupt moves
that he's doing and his emergencies for everything except for this.
That's what he's doing. He's setting us up for the
Democrats again, okay, and he's going to hand the baton

(01:36:24):
off to them just like you saw, like Lance did
in the video he hands the torch over to Biden.
He's in the process of handing the torch over to
the next Marxist Democrat right now when he's doing this
kind of stuff.

Speaker 3 (01:36:36):
Yeah, we don't want to. It's the elite. The rich
are very dislikable. They have all these different reasons that
you should dislike them and be concerned about what they're
up to. But the amount of money they have isn't
one of them. It allows them to enact their agenda.
Chances are they got it through immoral means. Chances are
it's very difficult to make a billion dollars ethically. I

(01:36:58):
agree with them on that point. Where chances are.

Speaker 2 (01:37:00):
And when you look at what these people want to
do with a technocracy, right, and it is these people
who are insanely wealthy and they want to make sure
that they control everything. It's not enough. It's always got
to be just a little bit more as John d
Rockebeller said to the reporter, So it's never enough for them.
They've got to have everything, and that's their plan. They're
just like the Marxists, that's the and and so when

(01:37:23):
you when you do this kind of stuff, what he's
doing is he is strengthening the Marxists that are out there.

Speaker 3 (01:37:30):
And that's what I see so much of is there's
you know, there's people in the libertarian right that are
upset about the policy behind what he's done and what
it's caused and the damage it's inflicted. And then there
are just the people on the left that are mad
that Donald Trump is rich and they don't have that money.
How why does he get that money? And I don't

(01:37:51):
get that money.

Speaker 2 (01:37:52):
That's right, and that is socialism is built on mb
okay and and you want to build socialism this kind
of thing to make people angry about the decadence that
he engages in him.

Speaker 3 (01:38:06):
Just having a large quantity of money is not reason
enough to dislike him. And that's what we see in
so many of these leftist circles is just you could
see it with Luigi Mangioni. People not knowing anything about
the case, people not knowing anything about why he did
it or how bad the insurance company was just like, oh,
well the guy was rich, so you know, hey shoot him.
Who cares?

Speaker 2 (01:38:27):
So Trump gets on social media he says, I don't
think I've got the legal authority to pay people using
the emergency funds from SNAP. Again, like I said, the
first time you've ever heard him say I don't think
I've got the legal authority. First time you heard him
say that about anything, isn't it? And the first time
he's never wanted to use an emergency either. So this

(01:38:49):
is so Newsom and the rest of them are using
this and really making hay with it. The Democrat Party said,
the emergency reserves and the SNAP program we're meant exactly
for a government shutdown and other funding disruptions. Why do
we think that, Well, because it's literally written into the bill.
Why did it take a court order for the Trump

(01:39:11):
administration to do the right thing and prevent Americans from
going hungry. Why did the Trump administration say we're not
going to release SNAP funds sue us? Why did it
take a judge saying this is clearly written in the
bill that these emergency funds will be used in the
case of a government shutdown to feed Americans. Why did
it take that? And then again, you know, we have

(01:39:36):
the president while that is all happening, tweeting photos of
his newly gilded bathroom. So this is a Democrat who
went on with a Fox News and the Fox reporter
that was there hunt when she said that, she said, sure,

(01:39:57):
they don't go hungry. We have a president who tweeted
photos of his gilded bathroom, and that left the reporter
hunt at Fox scrambling forwards. She said, the uh, moving
on from that as quickly as you can. He was
so fun that he said what he was thinking. You know,
we're got to move on from that as quick as
like hey, they actually said it out loud.

Speaker 3 (01:40:18):
This just the dichotomy of things going on. Just imagine
some poor soybean farmer just his business absolutely decimated by
what's going on. That's right with this just comes up
to Donald Trump hadhand. You know, mister president, I believe
that you're trying to do the best for us. I
voted for you. I truly have faith that you are

(01:40:38):
trying to help us as a people. He goes, yes,
that's great, that's great. Have you seen my new bathroom.

Speaker 2 (01:40:43):
It's gold. It's very great.

Speaker 3 (01:40:44):
Yes, I know you're suffering. That's too bad for you.
My bathroom is great.

Speaker 2 (01:40:49):
Okay.

Speaker 4 (01:40:49):
We have a video on the deck of a farmer
saying essentially that not too Trump. But obviously Trump wouldn't
be bothered to go listen to a farmer.

Speaker 2 (01:40:58):
That's right. Yeah, we're going to get to that in
a moment. The luxury gap. Trump is building his palace
as Americans face going hungry. This is The Guardian, and
this is something else that was said by one of
his opposition in America. We don't build palaces. You say.
This is again the king and his palace and all

(01:41:18):
the narrative. Trump is feeding all of this stuff, and
I think he is doing it because that's the role
that he was chosen to play. It is a civil
war that they're trying to push us into. It is
a class war that they're trying to push us into.
So again, he's out there hoaring with a super rich
in order to fund a three hundred million dollar ballroom

(01:41:39):
while cutting food aid for those on low incomes through
the president's architectural folly into sharp relief, says The Guardian. Again,
they're leftist socialists. They're playing the class warfare card, and
Trump is giving them all of the ammunition that they need.
Truly is as they portray him as and out of

(01:42:00):
touch king along the lines of the French Revolution. It
was a feast fit for a king. From gold rimmed
plates on gold patterned table claws decorated with gold candlestickholders,
they gorged on heirloom tomato, panzanella, salad, beef wellington, and
a dessert of roasted angou pears, cinnamon crumble and butterscotch

(01:42:20):
ice cream. On the fifteenth of October, Trump welcomed nearly
one hundred and thirty deep pocketed donors, allies, and representatives
of major companies for a dinner at the White House
to reward them for their pledged contributions to a vast
new ballroom now expected to cost three hundred million. Think
about how this thing has inflated, right, It's only been

(01:42:43):
kicked around for a few months here, and it's already
gone from two hundred million to three hundred million, a
fifty percent increase. So again, they go back to Louis
the sixteenth Marie Antoinette, who spent lavishly at the court
of Versailles, or to Ferdinand and a mind Marcos of
the Philippines who siphoned off billions while citizens endured deepening

(01:43:05):
poverty and everybody. For her, it wasn't the marble bathroom
or the gilded ballroom. For her, it was her collection
of thousands of shoes, or however many she had. I
don't know. Now America has a jarring split screen of
its own between an oligarch president bringing a Midas touch
to the White House and family's going hungry, workers losing pay,

(01:43:27):
farmers going broke. This is what he's bringing to us.
You know. The interesting thing is that did you get
the Hillary video that I sent this morning? Lance?

Speaker 4 (01:43:38):
No, I didn't see that.

Speaker 2 (01:43:40):
Okay, so Hillary is There was a clip from Hillary
and a quote from Hillary saying somebody needs a present
like Trump, who can't be bought because he bought her, right.
I guess she figures he can't be bought he's got
so much money. But that kind of tells you something
about both Hillary and Trump.

Speaker 3 (01:44:01):
I know I bring him up all the time, but GK.
Chesterton has a very good quote relating to this, yeah,
you know, relating directly to the rich man. He says,
you know, people look at the rich man and say
we need to elect him because he cannot be bought.
But the truth is about the rich man that he's
rich because he has already been bought. He already sold

(01:44:21):
out preemptively before you ever saw him, before he got
to this station where he is, where you're looking at
him saying that's the guy we need because he's got
billions of dollars. He accumulated those billions of dollars by
selling out everything he held dear, all of his values.
Everything you hold dear is just something to put up
for auction for that man, something that he can sell
away from you and take from you.

Speaker 2 (01:44:42):
Yeah, that's right. Well I'm paraphrasing, right, he said, the
root of all evil is a love of money. There's
not money, but it's love of money. Quite frankly, the
laft dude, doesn't You can still love money if you
don't have it, right, so.

Speaker 3 (01:44:53):
Said, it's just a lot more fun when you do have.

Speaker 2 (01:44:56):
It, that's right. So you know the socialist revolutionaries that
are out there that are envious of this. So socialism
is built on him by and it's built on the
love of money for people who don't have who want
it so badly.

Speaker 3 (01:45:08):
Which tends to make them even angrier and more bitter
and less pleasant to be around.

Speaker 2 (01:45:13):
Yes, image, you said, Yeah, there, it is right there,
Hillary Clinton in nineteen ninety four, we could use someone
like Donald Trump as president, someone who could not be
bought or changed. Well, I don't know, but I think
he's been changed. The only thing hasn't been changing with
the business diapers.

Speaker 3 (01:45:29):
It's nice to think that nineteen ninety four Hillary Clinton
and modern day maga voters share the same opinion. Apparently, Yeah,
that's right.

Speaker 2 (01:45:39):
For years, Trump has cultivated the image of a blue
collar billionaire. Last year's presidential election, he beat Harris by
fourteen percentage points among non college educated voters, doubling his
margin in twenty sixteen. Yet he grew up in an
affluent neighborhood of Queens, New York, joined the family business
as a property developer, received a million dollar loan from

(01:46:01):
his father to get started. He attached his name to
luxury hotels, golf clubs, and achieved celebrity through the New
York tabloids and his host of the reality TV show
The Apprentice, and especially with wrestling. I mean, you know,
he was there with Vince McMahon doing a lot of
wrestling stuff. So that's what the image that he carefully
cultivated through the Apprentice and through professional wrestling. But here's

(01:46:25):
the newsflash, guys, he's not an anti globalist either. It's
not just that he's not a blue collars doesn't have
affection for blue collar people or farmers or whatever. He's
also not an anti globalist. He's also not a Republican.
He's been a lifelong Democrat and he still is a Democrat.
You look at his policies. He's tax and spend, he

(01:46:47):
wants foreign intervention all the time, he wants the LGBT promoter,
and a deviant with all that, he's a gun grabbing,
war mongering world policeman type of guy. He is a Democrat,
and everything that he does I mean to me. You know,
the Republican Party used to stand for limited government and

(01:47:08):
limited involvement in other countries. At least they would say
they would campaign on that regardless of what they did.
They would campaign for a las a fair foreign policy
as well, especially economic policy domestically, but not Trump.

Speaker 3 (01:47:23):
I also have to say, I am so thoroughly sick
of this relatable billionaire stick.

Speaker 2 (01:47:29):
They are going for.

Speaker 3 (01:47:31):
Oh look, Mark Zuckerberg is a regular guy. He wears
T shirts and pukashell necklaces and he's just a normal guy. No,
he's not. Mark Zuckerberg will never have to worry about
money for the rest of his life ever again, he
never has to devote a single thought to it. This
whole relatable shtick is sickening to me. This guy could

(01:47:51):
afford him.

Speaker 2 (01:47:52):
Some kind of a weird power trip too, because otherwise
a normal person money, they would just relax or help
other people anything, except these guys got to get more,
got to get more, got to control the entire world.

Speaker 4 (01:48:03):
They wouldn't have become billionaires in the first place. They
wouldn't have gotten that opportunity if they were normal people.

Speaker 3 (01:48:09):
Yeah, and it's just the average person is closer to
being the destitute bum on the street than they are
to being Mark Zuckerberg or Donald Trump or any one
of these guys. And again, this isn't about NB. I'm
not sitting here like, oh.

Speaker 2 (01:48:22):
Mark, I should have Mark Zuckerberg's They've been sold a
fantasy image on TV and they bought it. You know,
this is like somebody believing in when they see Erison Ford.
He says, I'm so sick and tired of that song
that follows me around. They were that. You know, it's like,
I'm not Indiana Jones, stop it. That was a role
I played in a movie. And yet people, you know,

(01:48:44):
Trump openly embraces these roles that he's put himself in.

Speaker 3 (01:48:48):
It's just no more relatable billionaires. You guys can afford everything.
I'm tired of people sitting there pretending, oh, look, he's
just like he's not. If this guy wanted to, we
could afford the most ridiculous excent. If Jeff Bezos wanted
to launch a peacock into space, he could think about that.
If Jeff Bezos wanted to be the first man to
put a peacock in space, he could do it for

(01:49:09):
no reason other than he could.

Speaker 2 (01:49:11):
Yeah, well, and that's the type of thing. He already
kind of did that with those women that he claimed
that the.

Speaker 3 (01:49:18):
More worthless endeavor even than a peacock.

Speaker 2 (01:49:20):
They were peacocks, but it's a question as to whether
or not they actually went up.

Speaker 3 (01:49:24):
It's just like back like Howard Hughes, in my opinion,
was a more respectable billionaire because he was crazy and
everyone knew it. He indulged his eccentricities and insanity because
he could. And that's what these people have hidden from us. There.
Insanity is darker and deeper, and it is buried and hidden,

(01:49:45):
but it's down there, and it's not just oh, I'm
not going to cut my fingernails and so I'm going
to poison the world.

Speaker 4 (01:49:50):
Yeah, people like Peter Thiel and others will hide behind
libertarianism in the free market, as though that's what got
them their money, as though they weren't, you know, bought
and paid for agents of the state. Right, it's not
a criticism of the free market to criticize these billionaires,
that's right.

Speaker 2 (01:50:08):
Trump has successfully branded himself as a voice of left
behinds and towns hollowed out by industrialization. I wouldn't say
industrialization hollowed out by government, because this is the guardian
they're going to. They're taking the left s viewpoint, and
so he was able to sell them make America a
great again nostalgia and they don't realize that was what's

(01:50:30):
killing America is the government that he wants to make
a bigger part of their life and to take over
more of their life. His speeches are peppered with aspirational
promises that his policies will guarantee his supporters a share
of the nation's wealth. Let me just say to Maga,
America became great because it didn't have government. When government

(01:50:50):
became great, America diminished, and it's continuing to diminish. And
it is utter folly to think that you're going to
have some kind of a government savior. It was going
to act like a benevolent dictator on your behalf and
make government even stronger, even more centralized, even more controlling
of your life. That is not going to make America

(01:51:11):
great again. It's going to make America something it never was.
Trump voters turned a blind eye to the largest of
the first term and how it might benefit his family,
But it was clear from his inauguration in January, when
he was surrounded by the tech titans like Jeff Bezos,
Tim Cook, Elon Musk, Sundar Peachhai, and Zuckerberg that part
two would be different. Trump has made a personal profit

(01:51:33):
of more than one point eight billion over the past year,
according to a new financial tracker run by the Center
for American Progress think tank, which says the lion's share
came from launching his own crypto ventures while he was
shutting down regulation of it. Sources of income include gifts,
legal settlements, and income from a forty million dollar Amazon

(01:51:56):
documentary about Millennia and May. Trump's said that he would
accept a four hundred million dollar luxury plane from Cutter
and use at as Air Force one, despite concerns that
it could violate the US Constitution's emullience Claus again, you
didn't hear him say I don't think I'm legally allowed
to do that. He says that when it comes to
giving food to poor people, as the government has been

(01:52:20):
has gotten everybody accustomed to so. In October was reported
that he was demanding the Justice Department pay him two
hundred and thirty million dollars in compensation over federal investigations
that he faced well that he claims were politically motivated.
They were politically motivated. But not a penny to the
people of January sixth, who suffered the far worse than

(01:52:42):
he did. They went to jail, they were tortured in jail.
Not a penny to any of them, and not a
penny to any of the farmers that he shot with
his tariffs. But he's going to write a check for
himself for two hundred thirty He said, Hey, it's kind
of interesting. I can write this check to myself because
it's my Justice apartment is I'm going to tell them
what to do them. They're going to pay me two

(01:53:03):
and thirty million in compensation.

Speaker 3 (01:53:05):
You would think that even from just a pr perspective,
as someone who is as rich as Donald Trump is,
he could at least look at it and say, the
jan six people have suffered greatly.

Speaker 2 (01:53:14):
Yeah they were.

Speaker 3 (01:53:15):
They were the ones that really suffered through this. It
wasn't me, No, I'm going to force this.

Speaker 2 (01:53:19):
It was that made him president. Okay, he benefited from
all that stuff, and so if it cost him two
in thirty million, he I'd just look at that as
card doing business cost of his campaign. He never spent
a day in jail, he was never tortured in jail.

Speaker 3 (01:53:32):
No, but he should look at this and say, I'm
going to force them to pay, but I'm going to
distribute this two hundred thirty million among the January six people.
This is going to be recompense for what they suffered.
The DOJ stepped way out of bounds. They were obviously entrapped.
The FBI has admitted it, despite what other people are
trying to say. And just from a pr perspective, he
could look at that and say, this will buy me
so much goodwill.

Speaker 2 (01:53:53):
But he doesn't care about them because he already fleeced
those people before he sent them to January sixth, He
fleeced them for two hundred and fifty million.

Speaker 3 (01:54:00):
It's his second term. He's got nothing to worry about.
These people are still in his pocket despite the fact
that he sold them down the river.

Speaker 2 (01:54:07):
That's right, and he picked their pocket on the way.
He got turned fifty million dollars from them in order
to do a legal fight, which you didn't really do.
And he made more money after the election they did before.

Speaker 3 (01:54:19):
But this is just from every perspective other other than
the most directly beneficial, like what makes me the most money?
Giving away this two hundred thirty million dollars to the
victims that really suffered would earn him so much goodwill.
It would reignite his base. It would give them something
to point out and say, look see, I know you
guys been complaining. I know he's been doing some stuff,

(01:54:40):
but look at what he's really for the people look
at what he's doing. He's got no interest in that. No,
he didn't even mention it as one of those things
like sometimes he'll make these throwaway comments. You're like, that
would be a good idea if he did that. He
doesn't do it, but sometimes he spit balls a good idea.
Not even once has he brought up something about them.
Was the last time even mentioned the January sixth people.

Speaker 2 (01:54:58):
As far as I'm.

Speaker 3 (01:54:59):
Aware, I haven't heard talk about them in months.

Speaker 2 (01:55:01):
They didn't even have to go to jail. As I
said many times, he could have preemptively pardoned them, and
his apologists in the press were saying, he can't do that. No,
it was done when the Insurrection Act was put in.
The Insurrection Act was put in to punish people who
had fought for the Confederacy, and the president at the
time said, that's it. I'm going to pardon all these

(01:55:21):
people before you get a chance to do that. And then,
of course it also happened with Gerald Ford, who pardoned
Nixon before they indicted him. And then we see after
the that all was in place before, you know, before
Trump had that opportunity to help these people for two weeks,
and then you had. Afterwards, we see what Biden did

(01:55:43):
in terms of preemptively pardoning his son. Trump doesn't care about.

Speaker 3 (01:55:48):
If Biden can preemptively pardon a crackhead degenerate. Yeah, Donald
Trump could have pardoned these people that were roped into
and suckered into this.

Speaker 2 (01:55:59):
Well as bad as part hardening a dope d degenerate
like Biden, Hunter Biden, you had Gerald Ford pardon Richard Dixon.
I mean, who's worse. I don't know. Well, when the
president doesn't, that's right. It's not illegal, yeah, or on
illegal either. So anyway, he's all about funding his ballroom.

(01:56:19):
But all of this money that's being transferred, it's not
being funded, of course, by the taxpayers, but by the
new masters of the universe. This is government folks buy
for and of the technocrats. That's what Trump is about.
And in terms of what he's getting out of this,
we keep seeing this over and over again. He's using
public power for private gain. You can see it over

(01:56:43):
and over again. And what he does good example of it,
I think again is that sixty minutes thing is you
got people are sore losers, but he's a sore winner.
And so his ego was was hurt. He thought that
they unfairly edited the stuff. They released it and saw
that you could see that they did not edit it
to make La La Harris look good, and it was

(01:57:04):
not deceptive the way that they had edited. But still,
rather than fight him, you had the owner of sixty
Minutes gave him the sixteen million dollars because she wanted
to sell the company and he was using public power
the FCC to block that sale, and they blocked the
sale and twisted her arm into settling with him for

(01:57:26):
sixteen million dollars. Right there, that's public power for private gain.

Speaker 3 (01:57:30):
Got a comment here from Trump Berger says, but Trump
pardoned Lil Wayne and Roger Stone though.

Speaker 2 (01:57:36):
It's just so public pardon p Diddy. Yeah, And I
think he is building up to pardoning Maxwell because he's
just not arrogant. He thinks that he can do that,
and his people still won't abandon him. We'll see millionaires
and billionaires whine with him and dine with him, and
everything is fine with him because it's public power for

(01:57:57):
private gain. They're not donating this money because it's nice
thing to do. There's some sort of benefit to them.
And I tell you what, it's not just that it's
going to be a great place that we can go
party when we go to Washington as usual. The best
investment you can make as a politician. You give politicians
money and you wind up getting a thousand times the

(01:58:17):
amount that you gave them back. We've seen this over
and over again. You give somebody millions, you get back billions.
You give them thousands, you get back millions. We see this.
This is the way the game is played. This is
one of the ways that these people got to be
so wealthy. So this is interesting. John Zibie and I
put off playing that clip of the farmer to this

(01:58:38):
point because John Zigbie, the pollster, said, for the first
time in quite a while, Democrats have an opening with
rural voters. Medicaid and snap our infrastructural necessities in the
porest counties, and without programs like this being funded, you're
not just talking about hurting poor people or rural people
who are invisible. You're talking about shutting down hospitals and

(01:58:59):
clinics that matter to people. And then add to that
the now the farmers were struggling as they always are,
and then he adds the tariffs like gasoline to a
burning fire, and this is what one farmer is saying
about this.

Speaker 15 (01:59:17):
This is my thirty ninth crop. I started in nineteen
eighty six, the year I graduated high school. I could
plan an acre of beans in nineteen eighty six for
thirty bucks. It irritates me that you don't have the
guts to acknowledge that the people do not pay the tariffs.
I don't care if it's John Deere, case Caterpillar. All

(01:59:42):
that stuff is outsourced overseas, and the guy that pays
it is the guy that purchases. I can buy a
bearing for a combine and it's made in Taiwan.

Speaker 2 (01:59:54):
Or who knows where.

Speaker 15 (01:59:57):
Parts have overdoubled in the last year, if you can
get them. The dealer at Marshall has a backlog for
almost four months, so they can't get parts because of
Trump's stupid terriffs. I think agriculture has taken a heck
of a hit on a lot of misinformation, and he

(02:00:20):
is not helping the farmer. I mean, we farm about
thirty five hundred decres.

Speaker 2 (02:00:27):
We are going to be so far in the red.

Speaker 15 (02:00:30):
When are you going to stand up for us instead
of kissing his ass for these trade dealers.

Speaker 2 (02:00:36):
And the tariffs, more so the terriffs than the trades.
Well there you go, right, it's the tariffs that are
hurting them, and it's tariffs are hurting domestic manufacturers as well.
Here's a farmer saying, now I can't get parts for
this stuff. It's incredibly expensive and we can't get him anyway.

(02:00:56):
And that's Trump's tariff program. That's there also doing the
same thing to people who want to manufacture things domestically.
They can't get the parts to manufacture domestically. We don't
have a vertically integrated country. We have a supply chain
that has for decades been incentivized to spread all over
the world. And I don't have a problem with it.

(02:01:18):
I mean, I'm just looking at this is to whatever
is most efficient. It's the government that thinks that we
need to be vertically integrated within the country. But this
doesn't vertically integrate us either. Right. His policies are stupid
in the sense that they don't accomplish the stated purpose.
You want to have domestic manufacturing, Well, people can't do it.
They can't pull themselves up by their bootstraps. They can't

(02:01:38):
get the parts that they need here. So yeah, they
do have an opening in the rural areas. And I
don't want to see the Democrats in power. I want
to see some traditional Republican policies put in place. But
Trump is not a traditional Republican. He doesn't believe in
free markets. He doesn't believe in free trade, he doesn't
believe in free speech. He doesn't believe in say Amendment.

(02:02:00):
He doesn't believe in the rule of law. He doesn't
believe in due process. He believes in war and control
through emergencies, except when it's an emergency for the people,
then he looks the other way. So you have a
Sorous's soy boy. Bessant was on with CNN's fake Jake Tapper,

(02:02:21):
and Tapper hit him on the optics of Trump's Great
Gatsby Bash. I guess we said we're going to make
America Great Gatsby again. The kin decadent affluence that's shown
with that. So Bessnt served up a healthy dose of
what about ism with Jake Tapper when he was asked
about the optics of Trump's Great Gatsby Party. Obama told

(02:02:44):
the crowd of this last week that Trump had been
focused on building a three hundred million dollar ballroom and
he says that if you don't get an invitation to
the next White House shindig, you can always watch the
festivities on Trump's live feed on True Social And so
Jake hits him with these comments to see what he's

(02:03:04):
going to have to say, and he says, Tapper said
to Bessant, he said, I've heard Republicans even expressed concern
about the optics here of parties and lavish ballrooms and such,
while a lot of Americans are hurting. What is your response,
he says, Well, my response is that Democrats should reopen
the government. And you know, I believe Obama played a
record amount of golf for any president, So you know,

(02:03:25):
I'm not sure why he's out there throwing stones. You know,
that is unfortunate. We've got two fifty two Republican senators
who voted to reopen the government and two brave Democrats,
and I'm calling on five moderate Democrats to be heroes
and reopen the government. But the reality is is that
if you look at in terms of golf, maybe we've
got a new metric care for bad presidents. Obama did

(02:03:49):
play a lot of golf. In eight years. He played
three hundred and thirty three rounds and five years. Less
than five years, Trump has played three hundred and seventy
seven rounds. So maybe that is a good metric of
bad government because the person who holds the record is
actually Woodrow Wilson, who I would put right up there
the top for really really bad presidents. He played twelve

(02:04:13):
hundred rounds of golf during two terms, and so it
remains to be seen whether Trump can play as many
rounds of golf as with Wilson. Maybe he'll create something
like the Federal Reserve in place of the Federal Reserve.
We'll see what happens. But it's not just limited to
Trump and his corrupt parties. He's also got a lot

(02:04:35):
of corrupt people in his administration, people like Cash Battel.

Speaker 16 (02:04:38):
For example, a breaking new report indicates that FBI Director
Cash Pattel used a sixty million dollar jet, this one
right here, to ferry around his twenty six year old
girlfriend to a wrestling match and then back to her
home one thousand miles away. This can all be seen
in publicly available flight tracking data. So is the average

(02:05:00):
American struggles to put food on our table. The government
shutdown goes on day twenty nine cash hotel's using our
money to ferry around his girlfriend.

Speaker 2 (02:05:08):
Yeah, he's cashing in just like his name.

Speaker 3 (02:05:12):
So Bes says, really not have the money to pay
for his own girlfriend's flight.

Speaker 2 (02:05:16):
Yeah, that's right to go to a wrestling match, of course, Right.

Speaker 3 (02:05:21):
We're ruled by such interesting people, aren't.

Speaker 2 (02:05:24):
We Never think a girl on a date to wrestling match.

Speaker 3 (02:05:27):
I can't say I have either, that's my wife.

Speaker 2 (02:05:30):
Yeah, it's anyway, Best said SNAP food benefits could restart
by Wednesday. Well, that may be because we've had two
federal judges in Massachusetts and Rhode Island ruled on Friday
that they have to use the emergency funds to pay
Snap benefits. They said, that's what it's there for. It's
there in the in the document, they said. So again,

(02:05:54):
this is Trump saying I have to obey the law,
when he's not obeying the law, and he's saying that
it's not an emergency when it is an emergency. He's
turned this whole thing upside down. He's got nobody to
blame but himself. So by the end of the week,
Democrats will be responsible for millions of Americans losing their
food stamps due to the refusal to pass a clean

(02:06:15):
continuing resolution, says zero Hedge. This is what aboutism to
the nth degree. Trump could be smart and Trump could
have blamed them, but instead he just like with the
Epstein thing, he makes it all about him, right, It
all becomes a streisand effect. And so pull up this

(02:06:36):
article Lance, This is the one from zero hedge best
and says snap food benefits could restart by Wednesday. I
want you to show the New York Post. This is
their optics. They've got Schumer with his head down and
they say they don't give a chuck food benefits for

(02:06:57):
poor runout Saturday. But DEM's still won't open the government. Okay,
So that's what the conservative approach is right there that
you can see. Now, is that going to be more
effective than Trump pardoning with a great Gatsby crowd and
cash Mattel going to wrestling matches with a private jet,
spending millions of dollars on that? All right?

Speaker 3 (02:07:17):
So personally, I think even if you can't get the
government back open, let's say these nasty Democrats are holding
everything hostage and you're just hamstrung. There's got to be
something you can do. Why don't at least put out
some executive order saying like, all right, the regulations on
food disposal have been a bit too tight for years.
It leads to massive waste and lost because these companies
a second, it's an hour out of date, they take

(02:07:39):
it off the shelves and they have to throw that
stuff away. We're going to acknowledge that perhaps it's been
a bit extreme, and we'll waive those laws for now
and let these companies start donating this food to certain places,
and we'll give them some kind of tax incentive right
off for it. You donate a bunch of your somewhat
spoiled food to these food shelters, they can assess whether
it's still viable, and you get a rite off for it,
and these you know, food starts getting put out to

(02:08:01):
these people. How about that. There's a little bit of
solution right there. Yeah, I mean, they started cutting regulation
that makes this impossible.

Speaker 2 (02:08:07):
Even when you look at the farmers who are hurting
because they can't sell their stuff to China. How about
the government buy up some of this stuff, right, Help
the farmers buy some of their food, hand it out
to other people. But we like we saw with the lockdown,
where farmers were destroying food on their farms because of
the government intervention, and then people cann't find any on
the store shelves. Kind of a situation like that. There's

(02:08:30):
so many different things that could have been done that
weren't done. You got MSNBC talked to a food bank
director who said, for every meal that a food bank provides,
the SNAP program provides nine. There's no way that we
can meet that gap. And just like I said before,
you know, just like you know, tearing apart the fabric
of the supply chain that he's doing with his tariffs

(02:08:52):
that are on again, off again. You know, we look
at this and there is but you know, this kind
of abrupt change without any kind of transition, without any
concern for the welfare of the people that it's going
to affect. This is what has been the hallmark of Trump.
His means are just purely destructive, with chaos as the

(02:09:15):
object appears to be, and with no path forward to
improve things or have structural change. As I said before,
you know, we've got a lot of people recently fired
from the federal government. They're showing up at these food
places as well. They were on the SNAP program. And
then You've got TSA agents that are showing up even
though they still have a job. They're not being paid

(02:09:35):
because of what the Democrats and Republicans are doing. But
Trump can't figure out a way to make this work
for him instead, and the Democrats aren't having to do
this to him. You know, the Democrats are just setting
back and watching him self destruct. And he's not just
self destructing himself, he's self destructing the opposition to the Democrats.

(02:09:56):
Massive lines for free food, as federal workers go unpaid,
the US shutdown, and so as all this is happening,
we had a lot of AI videos that went out
where they put people saying they were going to riot
and so forth. And one there was a large article
with a lot of different videos that were on social media.

(02:10:19):
This woman wrote that's actually done by the reporter was
alba qbas Fantausee. So she posted videos that were all
done by AI about SNAP beneficiaries threatening to loot stores
and the government's shutdown. Now they're not all done by AI.
And that's the problem. You know, when people put out

(02:10:41):
this kind of stuff without vetting it, and they jumped
the shark. And you used to see that at Info
wars all the time. What they do then, is they
make the real story unbelievable. You know, there are people
who are out there saying that we needed to loot
and so forth. But what this does is as inoculates
them against that. It was originally headlined Snap beneficiaries threatened

(02:11:02):
to ramsack stores over government shutdown, And we saw these
types stories on info Wars and Breitbart and other places
like that. I have seven different baby daddies, and none
of them know good for me, said one purported Snap recipient,
except this is all done by AI. The site was
promptly called out for running with phony video, and one

(02:11:23):
seven minute video titled fox News got duped by AI
and lied about it. The Bulwarks Tim Miller trashed the
site for horrific news judgment and falling for the fake footage.
After getting called out, the headline of the post was
amended to read AI. Videos of Snap beneficiaries complaining about
cuts go viral. The change was accompanied by a brief

(02:11:46):
editor's note at the bottom saying this article previously reported
on some videos that appeared to have been generated by AI,
without noting that this has been corrected so people who
were complained CNN, others were calling them out on I'm
not sure if I've seen anything like this before. Fox
fell for the AI video basically rewrote their whole story

(02:12:08):
when called out again. They were following many MAGA sites
that were doing the same sort of thing, and so
some states are trying to do this as a matter
of fact, when you look at Virginia, not that I'm
not a fan of Glenn Youngkin, but Glenn Youngkin saw
this coming probably before anybody else, and he started talking
about what they're going to do in Virginia to stop

(02:12:30):
this from actually happening, any measures that could be done
in the state, And so there are some states that
are working on this. A majority of states actually enacted
some sort of contingency plan ahead of the scheduled benefit end.
Many reallocated state funding to food banks to prepare for
the expected strain on resources, while others compiled a master

(02:12:52):
list of food security resources at local and regional levels.
Several states, including Alabama, Alaska, Florida, Idaho, indian In, Montana, Nebraska,
and Texas, confirmed that benefits would be disruptive, but have
not appeared to enact any supplementary measures, and so that
story goes down on a state by state basis. Sarah

(02:13:13):
Huckabee Sanders has decided she's try to move this in
a private way, in private direction, and she refers to
it as her ten thirty three initiative, referring to Luke
chapter ten, verse thirty three talking about the good Samaritan
and that the Samaritancy travel came where the man was,

(02:13:35):
and when he saw him, he took pity on him.
And so what she's trying to do is to set
up a pilot program that would help people who are
in difficult times to try to get them to where
they can feed themselves rather than just keeping them on
a roll forever. But it is still doing, still government
doing what Christians should be doing, and she even referenced

(02:14:00):
is that, but she's taking the responsibility again.

Speaker 3 (02:14:03):
The government makes it so difficult to engage in actual charity.

Speaker 2 (02:14:08):
Yeah, they do, whether it's rules about the food that
you can hand out to people.

Speaker 3 (02:14:12):
Or whether it's simply the amount of money they take
from you and the difficult they give you in viling
your taxes in all these other ways they make it
hard for you to give money. It's much harder to
give money when the government is taking a huge portion
of it. You've got less disposable income, so you can't
sit there and go, oh, well, my friend really needs

(02:14:32):
help right now. You're sitting there thinking I need help
right now. It makes it so much more difficult to
engage in charity.

Speaker 2 (02:14:40):
That's right. Well, and again, you know they're not going
to give you, you know, tax credit for taking care
of They're still going to tax you. They're going to
get paid first. And I've said that for the longest
time in terms of both health care and education, if
those are so important that the government needs to take
them over, that the federal government needs to take it over,
how about if they let us pay for it first

(02:15:01):
before we send our money to them. But no, they're
not going to do it that way. Question is why
are forty two million Americans relying on snap benefits? As
the story on zero hedge, forty two million Americans, a
number larger than the entire population of Canada, depend on
government subsidized groceries. It wasn't until lbj's Great Society Project

(02:15:24):
in nineteen sixty four that food stamps slowly became a
permanent mainstay of American life. By nineteen sixty nine, food
benefits were in full swing, yet only one point four
percent of the population used them. Strict eligibility requirements kept
the participation rate down until nineteen seventy seven. Candidates had
to have a gross income before the below the poverty line.

(02:15:47):
I think now you can get it. If your income
is like a one hundred and thirty one hundred and
fifty percent above the poverty line, you can still get
food stamps. Able body adults without children were lost largely excluded.
College students and immigrants were barred from the program. Able
bodied adults had to work or to be in training.

(02:16:07):
Monthly income and expense verification were required. Food stamps were paper,
and that created a shame factor when you started paying
in food stamps, so they got rid of that, so
nobody knows how you're paying. Just because someone was under
the powery line did not mean that they could qualify.
Even Most of the barriers have been absent from SNAP
in the past few decades, which is why the percentage

(02:16:31):
of users spiked from one point four percent to as
high as fifteen percent of the population. Today, the rate
stands at twelve and a half percent, which is still
extraordinarily high. Approximately nineteen million Snap users have been on
the program for longer than a year, and over eighty
percent of people on the program or able bodied and

(02:16:51):
below retirement age. See what happens is this safety net
becomes a trap to entangle you in it, to create you,
to create. We could see that with everybody when Trump
blocked everybody down and put out the stimulus program. That's
what they want to do with your universal basic income.
It is universal welfare program for everybody.

Speaker 3 (02:17:11):
That also comes a point where you basically are a
sucker yourself. If you're thinking, you know, I'm gonna go
out and work for Walmart. Walmart, I'm gonna make minimum
wage and I'm going to be exhausted, I'm gonna work
long hours. I'm not gonna get to spend time with
my family. And this guy is gonna sit home and
do nothing and collect a check that's more than mine. Right,
And just you're sitting there, it's like, what am I doing?

Speaker 4 (02:17:32):
Why?

Speaker 3 (02:17:32):
Why am I doing this? Why am I putting up
with the indignity and abuse that I suffer at my
job daily? When I could sit back, do nothing and
enjoy my life more. And they have made it so
that life is difficult, it's hard, it's stressful, and you
could you're sitting there thinking, Man, I could just kick back. Sure,
you know, maybe you know I've got to economize in

(02:17:54):
certain areas. Maybe I'm gonna have to deal with the
strings that come attached with it. But I'm already dealing
with all the these other strings in my life, am I?
If I'm just trading one set of strings over here
for this set of strings, who's to say they're not
going to be better than what I'm dealing with. And
it's very easy to understand how this becomes just a
lifestyle for these people, something they don't have any interest

(02:18:15):
in getting away from. Well, it's like any job I
could be qualified for, any job I could get, they're
going to pay me less than what the government gives
you for nothing.

Speaker 2 (02:18:21):
And then the government is doing this because it wants control,
same reason that it wants public transportation and not private cars,
they want the control over your life. And so this
article from zero Hedge then goes through and references a
bunch of these AI videos that were faked and said,
and here's an example of people that should not be
getting any of this stuff, and they were AI. But

(02:18:43):
this does not mean that SNAP needs to be shut
down entirely, And even if you shut it down, it
shouldn't be shut down abruptly. Give people a chance to transition.
I guess transition is not something that's in the vocabulary
of the Trump administration. If the program was relegated to
the elderly, the disabled, and short term support for people
in emergencies, then the cost could be reduced dramatically. The

(02:19:07):
fact that eighty percent of food stamp users are able
bodied and under sixty years of age is mind boggling,
not to mention the fact that one point eight million
non citizens that took SNAP in twenty twenty four the
same people that don't exist according to the Democrats. Again,
this is what I've said from the very beginning. You know,
why do we have this welfare magnet to pull people in,

(02:19:30):
say come here, We'll give you free rent, free housing,
will give you free food, on and on. The US
spends over one hundred billion dollars annually in food subsidies,
the largest food welfare program of any nation in the world.
No other single country comes close. Perhaps greater attention needs
to be paid to who qualifies for this program, which

(02:19:53):
with far more requirements and obstacles in place, says a
zero Hedge article. As a matter of fact, we have
one one out of every five kids is at risk
of losing snap in the shutdown, and it shows the
flaws and the federal program, says reason. This is how
they have woven their tentacles of dependency within society, just

(02:20:14):
like they try to do with the stimulus check and
the lockdowns and other things like that. This is when
you've got kids whose parents are on this. It's not
any fault of the kids, and they're the ones who
are going to suffer as well.

Speaker 4 (02:20:28):
Yes, Larrence, just you see these leftists talk about how
we need to make America like these successful socialist countries
in the Netherlands or where ever, you know, the one
that they talk about the most afficate in which exact country.

Speaker 2 (02:20:44):
Or Sweden or something.

Speaker 4 (02:20:46):
And if you look at it, though, the actual per
capita amount, the percentage of people's wealth that gets taxed
away is smaller than in the US in a lot
of these you know, so called socialist country.

Speaker 2 (02:21:01):
Yeah, that's right, because they you know, we're putting so
much money into the military industrial complex as well. We
spend more than everybody else combined.

Speaker 3 (02:21:09):
There's also the fact that from what I've heard, I'm
gonna preface this by saying I've never been to Norway
or Sweden or any of these Scandinavian countries. People love
to praise for their socialism, but from what I've read
and what I've seen, it's seen as kind of a
shame to be on the social benefits, on the social welfare.
It's not something they're proud of. It's just simply there
in case you need it. They have a hard working culture,

(02:21:31):
and when you end up on welfare, most people see
that as I need to get off this, I need
to work hard. I want to work hard and earn
my keep. It's simply there.

Speaker 2 (02:21:41):
The European countries used to have a market economy that
let them build up the wealth that they're now living
off of.

Speaker 3 (02:21:48):
And quickly going away.

Speaker 2 (02:21:49):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (02:21:50):
So you have a much smaller population, you have a
homogeneous population that gets along with itself fairly well, and
you have a culture that prioritizes not living on welfare.
These are incredibly different things from the welfare system that
we have here. It's still not good. I don't support it.
It is still socialism, but it explains how they've been

(02:22:10):
able to kind of carry on with it for so long,
and especially considering the fact that America has been putting
their military budget for years, so they don't have to
worry about that, they're free to chuck all that money
the welfare way.

Speaker 2 (02:22:21):
Right. Well, you know, this reason article basically looks at
two things. First of all, instead of it being a
temporary assistance for somebody who needs it, okay, this is
a program that the government is anxious for more people
to get enrolled. They would love for everybody to be
on it, quite frankly, and so they look at it
from that standpoint. And they also look at it as

(02:22:42):
a failure of centralization. So any think worse than a
socialist state is a centralized socialist state, gets to paraphrase it,
because they're saying a lot of these things could be
handled more effectively if they were at the state level,
and I would say at the local level. And I
would say if they were being handled by individuals as

(02:23:02):
it used to be handled in the United States, who
when somebody had a need, and they can happen to
any of us. When somebody has a need, the community
comes together, the churches come together, and they can see
that somebody really needs this rather than just gaming the
system and getting lazy. That's the reality that is being
lost here. But Benny Johnson got an article written on

(02:23:26):
zero Hedge because he said that we need to require
the recipients to reapply and prove that they're US citizens.
I've been saying that for the longest time. The welfare magnet.
You know, how about we just right there, you cut
off two million people who need to go support themselves,
maybe go back to their own home where things are
cheaper for them if it's too expensive for them to

(02:23:48):
live here.

Speaker 4 (02:23:49):
Now they expense They want masked ice people to just
go to random Americans and create problems. They don't want
any actual solutions. They're getting checking if someone's a citizen
at critical points such as getting snap benefits or when
they're arrested and let go m M.

Speaker 3 (02:24:08):
That's another thing is they set up these no win
scenarios where realistically, the government has a point. If you're
taking the government's money, the government should be entitled to
know if you're one of its citizens collecting its benefits.
So they set up this problem where you're looking at
you're like, well, logically, it makes sense the government does
want to know who you are. It does want to

(02:24:30):
make sure that you're not a leech from another country
here to suck out the substance. So it gives them
this probable cause to go, Look, we got to give
this idea to people. We've got to give it to them. See,
it's the illegals fault. They're all over the place. We've
got to know who's a citizen or not. And it's
just this back and forth that they lay.

Speaker 2 (02:24:49):
With it, and whatever it takes, you know, give them
the back or your hand, whatever it takes.

Speaker 4 (02:24:52):
It's always these false solutions to the real problems. It's yes,
we've got a major problem with immigration, so instead of
deporting these people when they're arrested, will let them go
and then have a separate police force that tracks them
down and also harasses American citizens while they're at it.

Speaker 2 (02:25:10):
Yes, that's right, which I was. Let's take a look
at the comments here before we take a break.

Speaker 3 (02:25:15):
That's right. Ton of Lord one three three seven says,
is that an ai background singer. It's obviously edited, but
it sounds real. You can hear the inhale before each
line is sung. That's actually my wife. That is.

Speaker 2 (02:25:27):
Yeah, it's a great job. You're doing that just a
couple of takes. Ye.

Speaker 3 (02:25:31):
She's actually a very talented singer. She's very good. She
spent a lot of time training. It had original aspirations
of going too Broadway, but you know, things changes you
get older, so that didn't happen. But she has a
very very pretty voice, very good singer. Yes, Jerry Alatalo
Gulf of Talking two point zero slash Venezuela coming in
three two one.

Speaker 2 (02:25:53):
Yeah, I think we should call this war the Vinnie Nam.
It's beyond. I just can't believe watching this thing developing
in slow motion as the carrier group is moving to Venezuela.
I guess that's when it's going to happen. Audi.

Speaker 3 (02:26:09):
Mr R cutting snap benefits while bragging about a ballroom
is mocking the people.

Speaker 2 (02:26:14):
That's exactly right. He's doing it in their face, and
you got to believe that that is intentional. I really
do think. You know, when you look at well the
Democrats dead for Trump, you know, James carvill said stop it,
you go and put that guy in office. You know,
I'll saying the same thing and then let him skip
all the Republican stuff and the Democrats put Trump in

(02:26:36):
the optics of all that stuff that was happening, and
Trump is now going to return the favorite because they've
got to keep changing teams there so that you don't
see that the real problem is you got to be
blinded by your partisan loyalties.

Speaker 3 (02:26:48):
There, Angie Oswalts, I agree, David. God delivered me from
my session with drinking alcohol, not the government or any
of its programs.

Speaker 2 (02:26:56):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (02:26:57):
I'm glad to hear that you have been to leverage
from that.

Speaker 4 (02:27:00):
Yeah, we mentioned this frequently when the topic of prohibition
comes up. But people die of overdoses of illegal drugs
in prisons all the time. It's a very common cause
of death in prisons. So clearly there is no level
of restriction that can actually stop this.

Speaker 2 (02:27:17):
The drug war will never save anybody. What it does
is it creates more intense versions of the drugs. We
even saw that in alcohol probation. And it destroys a
rule of law, it corrupts the government, and you know,
it's just one bad thing after the other, but it
doesn't accomplish the main purpose. We've got to get off
of that.

Speaker 3 (02:27:37):
Yeah, the Real Octos book says, let us face at
half the cost of your living or more. Is government taxes, taires, fees, finds, charges, licenses,
et cetera. Yeah, the government is an equal partner in
your life. Well, and they better start going out and
picking up some groceries.

Speaker 2 (02:27:51):
Because they're not going to give you the groceries the.

Speaker 3 (02:27:56):
Real octos who government produces nothing and is all of
our largest expenses in life. And if you don't know.

Speaker 2 (02:28:02):
Your biggest competitor in business too, you know, it's usually
people that started going to business. Usually they run a
foul of some kind of government regulation where they get
behind in taxes somewhere.

Speaker 3 (02:28:14):
And there's a billion different government regulations making it impossible
you'll never be able to know everything you're doing wrong.
So basically you are sitting there waiting and hoping that
some government bureaucurret, some officious little tyrant doesn't come in
and say, oh, looks like you didn't hold up your
end of the bargain on Code ninety two to a
subsection C. We're gonna have to dig you for that.

(02:28:36):
There's basic I'm as far as i'm aware, there's so
many different regulations that every business is just sitting on.
Who knows how many violations. New Republic Rising eighty three.
Trump's timing and habits of divisiveness favor communist and authoritarian regimes.
They salivate at the opportunity for inner division in the US,
riots louting the possibility for civil war.

Speaker 2 (02:28:58):
That's right timed.

Speaker 3 (02:28:59):
Non time. There's envious socialist revolutionaries, and there's those who
want justice to hold the guilty accountable. But we damn
both as if they're the same. Just bow out and
keep from being thought associated. No, I think it's just
important to make your agree.

Speaker 2 (02:29:14):
Well, I will damn all the socialists because it's a
damn ideology that needs to be damned, and it is.
It is horrible, and you know, you can have agreements
with the government, but if you want to correct it
by putting in socialism, that's only going to make things worse.

Speaker 3 (02:29:30):
Yes, I think it's just too excuse me, important to
make where you stand clear. Like I have a grievances
with the police. I want them reformed, I want changes made.
But I'm not going to stand up and go to
a Black Lives Matter protest where they're protesting the police either,
because their reasons for protesting are wrong and different, and
any reform they would enact would make things worse. Senior Garcia,

(02:29:54):
Today's black culture was specifically created to keep us divided.
The blacks are actually unknowing victims.

Speaker 2 (02:29:59):
In fact, really the Black Lives Matter stuff. Okay, that
whole movement was set up to keep there from being
a solution. If you wanted, if you're a minority and
you want to fix something that you are suffering at
a greater rate, okay, what would you want to do?
You would want to make common cause with everybody, because
there's more people who were white in terms of absute numbers,

(02:30:20):
not in terms of percentages. And this is what they're
left and the right to you know, they talk about
the fact that there's the right will say there's more
white people that are suffer from police brutality. The blacks
will say, we have a higher percentage of people who
suffer from police brutality. Both of those things are true,
but either one of those can be selectively used to

(02:30:40):
push forward your agenda. But instead of people coming together
and saying, why don't we stop this, why don't we
have a different set of rules for these people to follow, instead,
what they did was they made it only about skin color,
so they could keep the division there, and they could
keep the division there so that nothing was ever done
or change about the police and the way they interact

(02:31:01):
with people.

Speaker 3 (02:31:03):
Audi Mr R for those who have forgotten. Hillary Clinton
recruited Trump to be the GOB nominee. She was instrumental
in the media elevating his profile. As exposed by wiki.

Speaker 2 (02:31:12):
Leaks, he's an entry and candidate for the Democrats.

Speaker 3 (02:31:15):
Yes, there was clarified. That was in twenty sixteen high
boost No no more free handouts. I support the government
snap shut down, shut allwear welfare, off all of it.
And I agree with you in principle in the sense
that we the government does not have the authority or
the right to be doing this. That's right, But I

(02:31:36):
am also I am piteous of the people that are
dependent on it. I do not want them to starve.
It's a very difficult situation. They've created this sort of
no win scenario. Things have to be moved to the cycle.

Speaker 2 (02:31:48):
With the tariffs. There are people, are farmers, there are
manufacturers in the US who are dependent on this system
of a global supply chain. And if you're just going
to cut it off right now, just a plan for
chaos and unrest. And destruction. And that's the way I
see what Trump is doing with everything, and by abruptly doing.

Speaker 4 (02:32:09):
It, I would say, it's like the withdrawal from Iraq.
You know, we should never have been there, but you
can create more problems with how you fixed the other
problems that they've created.

Speaker 2 (02:32:20):
That's right. Trump had four years to get out and
he didn't do it in an orderly way, and so
then the thing collapsed with Biden and the Republicans. Cee
CEE Biden did that. It's like, well, you fail to
do anything to get out of there, you desired to
stay there forever. And that's the point. They want to
get everybody on welfare. They want to last forever for everybody.

(02:32:41):
They wanted to be universal and call it UBI. Yeah,
so they pacify and control all of us.

Speaker 3 (02:32:48):
And I understand that a lot of these people on
welfare are entitled, selfish and would basically seize the assets
of anyone that's even slightly better off than them. But still,
it's important to not just pity the people that we like,
the people that we can look at and go, oh,
oh that's a good guy. He's down and is luck

(02:33:08):
he needs some help. It's you know, think about Lord
of the Rings.

Speaker 2 (02:33:13):
Well, think about the Good Samaritan. I mean that was
a situation where Christ used that story because the Samaritans
were mixed ethnic group that was despised by the Jews,
and it was largely mutual for both of those and
so he used that to have a person who is
a different ethnic group, a different social group take care

(02:33:34):
of someone else. And that was the whole point.

Speaker 3 (02:33:38):
And it's just whatever solution there is, this isn't it,
And it's a really bad situation we're all in now
and other way.

Speaker 4 (02:33:47):
I also want to be clear that there are people
that aren't, you know, trying to game the system, people
that genuinely need help but eventually wind up on these things.
That doesn't mean that there aren't a ton of people
that are gaining the system, probably the majority of them.
But it is just a horrible situation that needs to
be fixed.

Speaker 2 (02:34:07):
That's right. When you get forty two million people and
the ones who are on it through no fault of
their own would be the one out of five children
who are on this as well.

Speaker 3 (02:34:16):
Yeah, so it's just it's a bad situation just to
be a transition. Yeah, you can't just rug pull people
like that. And like I said before, easy thing to
do is start removing a lot of the regulations that
make charity so difficult.

Speaker 2 (02:34:30):
That's right. When you do a rug pull like that,
would you do is you guarantee that things are not
going to change, You're going to get a blowback to
get the status quo.

Speaker 3 (02:34:39):
Even more so, I think we have narrow away narrow
gate ministries. How many disabled vets cannot qualify for SNAP
because VA disability is considered income for SNAP purposes, and
it puts them above the income range to qualify that.

Speaker 4 (02:34:54):
Illegals can get it though, just not vets.

Speaker 3 (02:34:58):
Real Jason Barker, when I was a kid, the church
took on the role of feeding the poor in our
small towns. You know, that's a something you don't get
as much of it.

Speaker 2 (02:35:07):
And he says, whereas the church, now, that's right, you
know when America was young, that was the situation, as
Alexis to tofold pointed out, and where is the church now? Well, again,
they are entertaining themselves for the most part. So I
just say, in a lot of these churches.

Speaker 3 (02:35:26):
Now, yeah, Audi m are are relying on government for
one's mere survival is what they want. Yes, you're going
to get just enough to live.

Speaker 4 (02:35:36):
That's what UBI is.

Speaker 2 (02:35:38):
They want you relying on them for the longest time
for food, for housing, for transportation, and on on. Now
you want you under their complete control. With UBI.

Speaker 3 (02:35:48):
They want you just comfortable enough that you wouldn't ever
think about doing anything else. Well, they give me enough.
I survive a Syrian girl. I don't know how you
could transition off welfare and snap gradually. The difference between
government welfare and entry level salaries is pretty large, and
the people on those programs have become experts at grifting
the game. And I think that's where you just, you know,

(02:36:09):
sometimes the chips do have to fall where they may.
And if these people don't want to work and are
simply refusing and are demanding their welfare back till them, well,
you're just simply not going to eat that.

Speaker 2 (02:36:18):
Well, I mean, you could go back for starters, you
could go back to the rules that were there at
the inception when one point four percent of the people
were on it. The way that this thing started. It's
now metastasized and grown. So you gradually start reducing the
program back to where it was and when it started,
and then maybe you get it off completely and let

(02:36:41):
private individuals take care of it. And then one of
the things that you do is Travis was saying, you
let people take a tax deduction if they help people,
you know, and some of that is there with the charities,
but you would maybe make that a little bit more
available to incentivize that through the eternal income to tact system.
It's never going to go away, right, so it's always

(02:37:04):
there about controlling people's behavior.

Speaker 4 (02:37:07):
As well as This simple solution here would get rid
of a good percentage of it. Just acquire people to
prove that they're a citizen. There's a lot of things
that you could do to curtail this that would have
a big effect.

Speaker 2 (02:37:20):
That's right. Yeah, And you limit it to children, to disabled,
to you have a time limit as to how long
somebody can be on this program. So it's a transitional thing.
So there's a lot of things like that that you
could do that would be gradual. Yeah.

Speaker 3 (02:37:35):
The real Octo Spook says, with automatons and robots, everyone
will be on snap and welfare unless we own those
automatons and robots. Why every one cannot wait for my
own automaton.

Speaker 2 (02:37:48):
As these guys are looking for their robot armies, and
of course Elon Musk has talked about that. Now, this
is what this thing looks like. This is kind of creepy. Actually,
you look at this clip here. Deep Yeah, you talk
about when you get a lot of Muslims and whatever words,
when you get a certain critical mass of mechanical people,
it's not going to be a good thing either. I

(02:38:08):
think we leave this armies of robots, robots making more robots,
they breed, they reproduce their everywhere. Yeah, so again, you
know what, what is it that they're planning on. See,
that's why the UBI thing is so important, because they

(02:38:34):
are planning on taking away our ability. They want to
make us dependent. That's another way to make us dependent,
make us dependent on them intellectually through AI, make us
dependent on them in terms of doing anything because of
their robots, and then having us completely under their thumb.
It is all simply about control. Well, we're going to
take a quick break, folks, and we will be right

(02:38:56):
back well.

Speaker 1 (02:38:58):
Before analyzing the globalists next move and now the David

(02:40:19):
Knight Show.

Speaker 9 (02:40:23):
Here News now at apsradionews dot com or get the
APS Radio app and never miss another story.

Speaker 2 (02:40:31):
Yes, and as we're going to break I cut you off. Lance.
I'm sorry about that. But Jan an interesting comment about
the robots and what one of the first one of
these robots is really like. Tell us a little bit
about that.

Speaker 4 (02:40:42):
Yeah, I just saw a bunch of headlines about the
first at home humanoid robots. And if you look a
little closer, it's something you can pay for now, but
it's you'll receive it once they fix the AI. Currently
the AI, and it is overcase of the AI being
actually Indians. And that's another thing they can do with

(02:41:04):
these robots is they can reduce the price of labor
down to the level that it is in India.

Speaker 2 (02:41:11):
That's right. And you know during the lockdown, I remember
they had somebody's using a virtual headset and they had
a robot that was actually physically in the store stocking
the shelves. And I don't know who'd be allowed to
come into the store because they got the lockdown stuff,
But anyway, this guy was working virtually. Of course, they
could be anywhere in the world. They could be in
India or any other poor countries, so they could outsource

(02:41:33):
the labor to these other countries and that's what you're
talking about. What a creepy thing to think that this
robot that you've got there is actually being remote controlled
by somebody with eyes on everything that you're doing and
access to everything in your house. And I can't think
of any worse scenario than that, and how creepy that is,
you know.

Speaker 4 (02:41:53):
And as I understand it, even after they fix or
even after they release it, it's still going to be
a matter of when you give it a new task,
they'll have some human do the task the first time
in order to teach the robots. So they'll always be
a camera feed from your robot to this company.

Speaker 2 (02:42:14):
And that's some people. Some people have talked about that
with rumbos and other things like that, that you know,
it's getting giving information about your house, but this is
far more involved and more direct and intimate and all
the rest of this stuff. And yet you know it
disguises it by having the person you know remotely and inside,
yet inside that robot. So we've had let's talk about

(02:42:37):
Vinnie and am the coming war that Trump so desperately needs.
Three killed and US attack on boat, says RTI. Actually
the headline should say three more killed. All three were
supposedly Narco terrorists. And we know that because we're told
that by Pete Hegseth and by the Trump administration, and

(02:43:00):
they have made this designation. They have labeled them as
Narco terrorists. And so just like these emergencies, once they
put that label on, they're free to do whatever they
wish if they designate you as a terrorist organization. And
remember during the Biden administration, those of us who were
pushing back against the lockdowns and the vaccines and things

(02:43:24):
like that, we were labeled as terrorists by some people.
We were called murderers, and you know, we were What
was it that Scott Adams said? It was like, it's
harder to tell the sociopaths, harder to tell the freedom
lovers from sociopaths. So again, you could be designated that
by any government in the future. The US has a

(02:43:46):
massed about sixteen thousand troops, eight US Navy warships, a
special ops vehicle, a nuclear powered to attack submarine, and
an entire aircraft carrier strike group is led by the
USS Gerald Ford is going to be arriving this week.
Trump said he had authorized CIA operations in Venezuela and
swol claiming that they would target drugs coming in from

(02:44:09):
the Latin American country. And so the president there in
maduro I said, Venezuela is innocent. Imperialism is only seeking
to justify war, to steal our riches and to bring
about regime change. That's what it's about. It's about regime change.
It's also about a wag to dog distraction, yet another
one for Trump. Should we have soldiers go and die

(02:44:31):
so that you can get Trump's follies off of the headlines.
Russia ratified a strategic part a partnership of Venezuela this week.
They've expressed their strong support for Venezuelan leadership and defending
its national sovereignty. Meanwhile, as the New American points out,
Pentagon doesn't know whom it's killing and the boat bombing

(02:44:56):
they said, well, this is part of a designated terrorist organization.
Well do you know that these people are part of
that designate a terrorist organization? No, you don't. You don't
know that. You don't know their name, you don't know
what organization they're with, you don't know if they've got
any drugs on their boat. And what we do know
is that they can't use those boats to get drugs
to the United States, So the Trump administration can't or

(02:45:19):
won't identify the sixty one people that the military has
already killed and the fifteen different alleged narco terrorist boats
that it has sunk in the last two months. The
meeting with a House Armed Services Committee was conducted by
Department Party policy officials, but interestingly enough, they did not

(02:45:40):
have any military lawyers there. The JAGGED people who were there,
and the purpose of the JAG people they don't make
these decisions. What they do is they are like the
ethical and legal advisors to the people who do make
those decisions. But the Pentagon and Haigseth have been hell
bent on getting these people out from the very beginning,

(02:46:01):
and they're trying to decimate the JAG corps even more
by moving a lot of them to immigration law. The
Pentagon's answers to lawmakers ongoing requests for legal justification for
the strikes failed to satisfy Democrat committee members, they told
reporters quote. Republicans also pressed the administration officials for more information,

(02:46:23):
said Politico. Democrat Sarah Jacobs of California said the level
of transparency was not okay. There's nothing that we heard
in there. That changes my assessment. This is completely illegal,
that it is unlawful, and even if Congress authorized it,
it would still be illegal because there are extra judicial

(02:46:45):
killings where we have no evidence. So these people have
not been taken to court. That's what an extra judicial
hearing is about, presenting evidence. And even if they were
found guilty, as I've said, there is no death penalty
for what they are accusing them of, So everything about
this stinks to the high heavens. The argument coming from

(02:47:07):
the White House was to say that, well, okay, we
know there's no fentanyl labs there, but they're probably involved
in cocaine, which is a facilitating drug a fentanyl. Give
me a break. The Department officials said they do not
need to positively identify individuals on these vessels to do
the strikes. They just need to prove a connection to

(02:47:29):
a designated terrorist organization or an affiliate. Well they haven't
done that either, right. We tried to get more information,
they wouldn't give us any answers.

Speaker 4 (02:47:39):
And so that whole statement is shocking. We don't need
to identify the people were killing so long as we
can connect.

Speaker 3 (02:47:46):
Them to someone.

Speaker 2 (02:47:47):
Yeah, yeah, think about with these people.

Speaker 4 (02:47:49):
Therefore, we can kill them regardless of who they are.
We don't even need to find out their identities before
we kill them. If we say that we're associated with
someone else.

Speaker 2 (02:47:56):
That's right, and they will be the ones who will
sociate you with those other people. Right. And we've seen
this play out on the left. Why is it that
Republicans are not having a problem with this? We know
how this is going to be done when the left
and the Democrats get in place. Representative Jason Crowe, another
Democrat in Colorado, told reporters that the briefing failed to

(02:48:18):
convince them that the strikes were going to achieve what
the administration claims. We need to get serious about the
flow of drugs. But I heard nothing today that shows
how they're actually going to end that. Well, you might
say that about everything in the drug war. You know,
say drugs are horrible, but how does any of this
affect any of that? Right, It's total. The drug war
is a total non sequitur to getting people off of drugs,

(02:48:44):
and yet they continue to use that as a scare
tactic to give them an excuse to do whatever they want.
So the last word that I gave rear Admiral Brian Bennett,
who was there, was I hope you recognize the constitutional
peril that you are in and the peril that you
are putting our troops in. And so Jacobs, the Democrat,

(02:49:08):
claimed that the administration only cited Article two of the Constitution,
which makes the president the commander in chief of the
armed forces. That was the only justification for the killing.
I am commander in chief of the armed Forces, so
I can do whatever I wish. I don't need to
have a decoration of war from the Congress. I don't
need to follow the law in any regard that being

(02:49:31):
the commander in chief of the Armed Forces does not
empower the president to undertake offensive military action without authorization
from Congress, nor does it give him the right to
violate the Fifth Amendments guarantee that no person shall be
deprived of life or liberty without the process of law.
And let me just stress that that's what the Constitution says,
you know, said the Constitution doesn't say, no citizen. And

(02:49:55):
I've had people here complain to me, say, well, I
don't care. They're foreigners. And you know, foreigners don't have
rights and anything. No people do, and humans have rights
and the Constitution refers to no person. It does not
say no citizen. Because if we allow our government to
take the life of human beings, it will feel eventually

(02:50:19):
that it can do whatever it wishes to us in
terms of taking our life extra judicially. And we've already
seen it in the Philippines from du Terte, and Trump
boasted and complimented him, And I remember at the time saying,
how in the world could he say this guy's doing
a great job. He was doing a horrific job. He's
now on trial for murder, for mass murder, for extra

(02:50:41):
judicial killings. He killed tens of thousands of people. There's
only several dozen that he's being charged with. They summarily
execute people about presenting evidence to the public. So it's wrong,
said ram Paul. But of course that's what Duterte was
doing in the Philippines, and Donald Trump in his first
loved what he was doing. It's another one of the

(02:51:03):
reasons why I said I could never support Trump ever,
wouldn't vote for him for dog catcher. I don't think
we're necessarily going to ask for declaration of war, said Trump.
I just think we're going to kill people that are
bringing drugs into our country, but you haven't proven that
they are. As a matter of fact, those ships that
you're blowing up are not bringing drugs into our country.

(02:51:24):
They're not capable of making the trip, and you haven't
proven that they've got drugs on the ships in the
first place. Democrats were excluded from a Wednesday briefing. Senator
Mark Warner was furious. He said, when an administration decides
you can pick and choose which elected representatives get the
understanding of their legal argument of why this is needed
for military force, and only choose as a particular party,

(02:51:48):
it ignores all the checks and the balances. When you
politicize decision making about putting our service members in harm's way,
you make them less safe. According to Politico, Republican lawmakers
said meeting was meant to be an informal event to
address specific lawmaker requests, not a formal briefing for all
the members of the chamber. That didn't help the anger

(02:52:10):
of the Democrats. They said, it is totally unprecedented in
my fifteen years of service in the US that intelligence
briefings on a matter of this consequence would be held
by one party alone, said Richard Blumenthal. Democrat, so Warner
pointed out, he said, if you've got a valid legal opinion,
wouldn't you want to share it with every member? If

(02:52:31):
you believe, I think the administration does that. We know
these guys are bad guys. Wouldn't you want to catch
them and show the world the drugs and show their
history of bad activities. Well, of course, it's not about
any of this stuff. And we can debate the war
on drugs, and we can debate what they're telling people
about this, but we all know that this is really

(02:52:52):
about regime change, pure and simple. The drug war itself
has been illegal and unconstitutional and a failure for fifty
plus years, So why wouldn't Trump jump on that and
use that for his illegal war here for regime change.
Trump seems intent on doing whatever he pleases regarding the

(02:53:12):
boat strikes, counting on compliance from a GOP Congress with
the desire not to be seen to be soft on drugs.
He told Pentagon Pete recently, Pete, go to Congress, tell
them about it. What are they going to say, Gee,
we don't want to stop the drugs pouring in? And
that's what people always say if you oppose the drug war.

(02:53:34):
If you oppose the unconstitutional drug war. There was never
a constitutional amendment to ban a single one of these drugs.
It was all based on a UN agenda. We have
a constitutional amendment to ban alcohol, number eighteen, and the
twenty first was to make it legal. Again, they ignore
the constitution in the drug war from the very beginning.
They ignore the fact that it hasn't done anything other

(02:53:55):
than give us a more concentrated forms of drugs and
to corrupt the government. And so this is the logical
continuation of this conclusion of it. And again, like Trump
is saying, so what a they're going to do? You
complain about this? Oh you want drugs, right? And I've
heard that many times from people when I complain about
the War on drugs, about its legality, about the way

(02:54:17):
that it's conducted. I always say, oh, so you like drugs, huh, yeah,
you libertarians like drugs. Well, there's some libertarians who do.
I don't agree with them, but you know that it
is not worked at all. So Pentagon tells Congress that
doesn't know who it's killing in Latin American boat strikes. Again,
this is from anti war as well, and I guess

(02:54:38):
it also tells them it doesn't care, right, so they
don't know, they don't care, and when the Democrats try
to get information, they don't give them any answers. They
argue that the cocaine is a facilitating drug of fentanyl,
but they haven't even proven that these people have cocaine
on these boats. And meanwhile, Pentagon lawyers were pulled from

(02:54:59):
the meeting. As I said, the deep dive on all
this is what's really going on with the JAG people
because this is unconstitutional, illegal and the people who are
engaging in it are actually engaging in criminal actions. Even
if the Congress authorized it, it would still be illegal

(02:55:19):
because these are extra judicial killings. And as I said before,
even if they gave them a trial and found them guilty,
there's still no legal death penalty for this. Meanwhile, WND
has got Victor Avilaw. It reveals the inside plan to
hit cartels with war level force before the drugs reached
the US. WorldNet Daily is pushing pedal to the medal

(02:55:43):
to sell this as a long awaited answer for the
drug war. This is something that was started with Tom Clancy.
It's clear and present danger. They were preparing public saying yeah,
that's right, this is bad. We know where those drug
cartels are, we know where their labs are, and so forth.
Why don't we just strike Mexico and, you know, just
go to war with the cartels that are down there.

(02:56:03):
They've been pushing this for a very long time, and
the real issue here is that the politicians have odd
on a power trip, a political power trip. So this
is a guy who is on with WorldNet Daily, who
is a former ICE agent and now he's with the

(02:56:24):
Drug Control Policy Group and talking about how the US
is finally treating the cartels as a foreign terrorist organization. Again,
that was the logical conclusion of where it would go.
Let's talk about who the real terrorists are, who the
real narcotics traffickers are. It's the CIA, it's the people
he used to work for.

Speaker 3 (02:56:43):
A really good movie, at least one of my favorite
movies is Ciicario. It's about, you know, the drug war,
in the back and forth and the clandestine operations that
go on in the background of this sort of thing,
and it does a very good job of showcasing the
type of monster that it creates when you were engaged
in these extra judicial killings and these people we know,

(02:57:06):
the cartels are evil. They do horrible things, and it
turns these men into monsters. They become monsters willing to
do anything to get their revenge on these people. And
that's what you will create if you indulge this by
any means necessary, doesn't matter who, doesn't matter, when, doesn't
matter where we're going to get our revenge. You're going

(02:57:26):
to create monsters. And that's not what we should be
trying to do.

Speaker 2 (02:57:30):
Yeah, you can become the monsters that you fight because
of the things that you engage in, and which is
basically well this article from Bloomberg says Hegseth is waging
war against the laws of war and against the JAG Corps,
which is there to advise them ethically, constitutionally, and legally

(02:57:50):
what they should be doing. If you're still not sure
whether the US is at risk of sliding into authoritarianism,
talk to some Americans who know all about the proper
and the proper uses of violence. These are the men
and women who were, who are or were in the
military so called Judge Advocate General Corps, the JAG Corps,

(02:58:11):
independent apolitical lawyers in uniform. These so called jags advised
the commanders of the world's mightiest war machine about how
to comply with domestic and international law. So they were
some of the first people that purged by Pete Hegseth,
and he's trying to get rid of even more because
none of this is legal, none of this is morally justified.

(02:58:34):
So much of what the Trump administration is doing. But
it's war after war after war. We didn't even get
to all the different wars. Yeah, can't even get to Russia.

Speaker 3 (02:58:42):
And surprize President everyone before we go. Jersey Boy, thank
you so much for the tips. He has job interview
coming up. Please pray for him. We have your guest recommendations.
We have them noted down. Thank you very much, Jersey Boy.
We appreciate it. For love of the Road, asked David
mentioned the first hour. If they got over three corps
for the last month's funding.

Speaker 2 (02:59:01):
God, yes, we did eighty two percent. Thank you so much.
Thank you, Thank you, Ryan. I appreciate it. You're a
big part of that too. Thank you so much. Ryan.

Speaker 3 (02:59:08):
Thank you to everyone. You have a great rest of
your day. We'll catch you tomorrow.

Speaker 4 (02:59:11):
And I don't know if you were thanked on Friday,
but thank you to for the love of the road.
Spencered Along and Nights of the Storm for gifting subs on.

Speaker 2 (02:59:20):
Kick Yes, thank you so much, thank you, thank you
for your support, and they are two very very faithful supporters.
Thank you. The common Man, they created common Core, the

(02:59:44):
dumbed down our children. They created common Past to track
and control us. Their comments project to make sure the
commoners own nothing and the communist future they see. The
common man is simple, unsophisticated, ordinary, But each of us
has worth and dignity created in the image of God.

(03:00:08):
That is what we have in common. That is what
they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us while they hide
everything from us. It's time to turn that around and
expose what they want to hide. Please share the information

(03:00:29):
and links you'll find at the Davidknightshow dot com. Thank
you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't
support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow
dot com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Ruthie's Table 4

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Mon Episode #2130: Nigeria: Another War for the Peace Prize President?

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Ruthie's Table 4

The Joe Rogan Experience

All Episodes

Mon Episode #2130: Nigeria: Another War for the Peace Prize President?

On Purpose with Jay Shetty