The Pandemic Incentive System

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:07):
Welcome back and joining us now is Zoe Smith. She
has set up a website a thrill Kill Medical cult
dot com. You can also find her on substack. The
name of the substack is Zoe. That's zwe dot substack
dot com. And we want to talk to her about

(00:27):
being a whistleblower and the things that she saw during
the pandemic lockdown. Zoe worked as a medical coder for
over a decade. Tell us a little bit about that.
What was that involved with? Is that for insurance purposes,
identifying the procedures and putting the right code on it.

Speaker 2 (00:44):
Yeah, Hi, thanks for thanks for being here. Yeah, so
a medical coder, A lot of people don't even know
that it exists because you don't really see it as
a patient.

Speaker 3 (00:53):
But everything that happens to you in a.

Speaker 2 (00:55):
Hospital, clinic, X ray lab, whatever has to have a diagnosed,
some procedure assigned, and that's how your doctor gets paid.
So the coder is the one who reviews that documentation,
assigns the right diagnosis code, assigns the right procedure code,
and that's what gets put on the bill and that
your insurance or Medicare uses to pay your doctor, ORB

(01:16):
or the hospital for their services.

Speaker 3 (01:18):
So it's really boring until would happen.

Speaker 1 (01:21):
Then you had a bird's eye view of what was
going on. I was just telling you off air, I said,
the AHA moment for me was the aha the American
Hospital Association, and I believe it was August of twenty twenty.
I've talked about this many times. They got very upset
because they said to CMS, who was paying them. They said,
you told us that we didn't have to have a

(01:42):
PCR documentation for this. He said that you didn't have
enough of them, and you said they didn't work, and
you said, we just pointed somebody to a clinical diagnosis,
and you would give us a twenty percent bonus on
everything that we did to the people, as well as
the upfront cash bonus of thirteen thousand dollars. And now
you want to have this new requirement. You know that's

(02:03):
not fair. And so they were complaining because they weren't
getting paid, and it kind of exposed the whole thing,
except nobody would cover that. It was amazing to me
how there was dead silence everywhere about that. I mean,
you incentiviize people to that degree. And I would always
say to people, look the money is the issue. You know.

(02:23):
The decoration of the emergency by Trump unleashed the money
and then they put out these rules through CMS and
paid these people to kill is really what was happening.
And that's what you saw as well.

Speaker 3 (02:36):
Right, Yeah, that's they did.

Speaker 2 (02:39):
I don't know if you're familiar with the vaxed bus,
but Children's Health Defense they sent out a third one.
So they've done a part one, part two, and now
part three. The part three is called authorized to kill
for that reason because the CARES Act really did. It
incentivized a behavior change in hospitals and with positions and

(02:59):
how they were able to practice medicine. It set everything
on its head and it incentivizes everything. What you're talking about,
what the AGA said about you didn't even need a
PCR test result to get that COVID diagnosis is absolutely correct.
And that was one of the things that I noticed
in the Pandora's box of things that changed right at

(03:21):
when they declared two weeks to flatten the curve in
March twenty twenty, they changed all the coding roles as well,
so they April first, twenty twenty is when the COVID
nineteen diagnosis went into effect, and we were actually told
to commit fraud before that time because we didn't have
a code to reflect COVID nineteen and we needed to

(03:42):
track that so much, and of course everyone had to
get the PCR test in order to get the diagnosis.
But then there was this official coding Guideline, which is
what we use as coders.

Speaker 3 (03:53):
It's like our bible.

Speaker 2 (03:55):
It tells us what's correct, what's fraud, and it's essentially
it lays.

Speaker 3 (04:00):
Out the rules.

Speaker 2 (04:01):
And in those rules, there's a part that says, in
order to be diagnosed with COVID nineteen, all your position
needs to do is write down in their medical opinion
that they think that you have COVID nineteen. They didn't
need to do an exam, they didn't need to have
a PCR test result, and it says right in that
official guideline. This is an exception to section two H

(04:23):
in patient Coding Guidelines, which says for every other diagnosis
they have to do an exam and they have to
have some sort of clinical documentation, usually some sort of
lab work or diagnostics to prove their working diagnosis.

Speaker 3 (04:39):
So COVID was an exception for.

Speaker 2 (04:41):
That, and that was one of the really big red
flags that came up for me, And of course I
noticed in my position, not only is everyone getting this
PCR test when we come in, they're not all sick,
but then they get this COVID nineteen diagnosis. And the
part that most people that still a lot of people aren't.

Speaker 3 (05:00):
Familiar with is when they did the two weeks.

Speaker 2 (05:03):
To flatten the curve and they locked down everybody. They
actually kicked people out of the ICU early, and they
shut down other wings of the hospital. They went down
to a skeleton crew, so they consolidated wings within the hospital,
so the ER and the ICU stayed open, but the
rest of the hospital was shut down.

Speaker 3 (05:24):
We were getting.

Speaker 2 (05:25):
Furloughed and laid off and hiring freezes and no raises,
no bonuses.

Speaker 3 (05:31):
During the time when the media was saying.

Speaker 2 (05:33):
These healthcare heroes are showing up to fight the onslaught.

Speaker 3 (05:36):
Of COVID nineteen patients. What was an onslaught of false
positive tests, But it wasn't an onslaught of a whole
bunch of patients. We were getting furloughed.

Speaker 2 (05:45):
So the hospital really really needed that money because they
were bankrupted right before those incentives came out, so they
really needed those incentives, so they were absolutely excited to
label someone as COVID nineteen at that twenty percent diagnosis,
and then he come up to the ventilator, which they
got another bonus for, and then the ren does appear,

(06:07):
which they were giving out like candy during this entire time.
The bonus really didn't go into effect until August of
twenty twenty, but they were using it from about April
all the way through.

Speaker 3 (06:18):
And I noticed how the protocols were killing.

Speaker 2 (06:20):
People, and doctors would just say, oh, this is a
progression of COVID nineteen. And to this day, a lot
of people will say, oh, I had a family member
that died of COVID. They went to the hospital because
they had COVID and they died of COVID. But I
asked them, did they really die of COVID or did
they die of the protocol? Were they not that sick
until they got there? And then they circled the drain

(06:43):
because in my experience, most of the patients within sometimes
a few days to sometimes it took up to a month.
But those protocols were killing people, shutting down their organs
and then they would die, and that wasn't normal. To
have that happen to a pneumonia patient.

Speaker 3 (07:03):
Normally, they'd be there three days, we pump them full
of antibiotics, which we weren't using for COVID nineteen, and
then they would go home. So this was totally backwards.

Speaker 2 (07:13):
And then I started to notice all the incentives because
even as a coder, they have all these checks and
balances in the electronic medical record system and it counts
against you if you miss something, So like if I
missed someone for COVID nineteen, I would get a notice
about it, like, oh, this is going to count against
your score and might not get a raised this year
because you weren't a good coder. And they were watching

(07:35):
that for Randesevir because the bonuses were so much on
the bill. Every single Randezevier infusion was four thousand dollars,
give or take a little bit throughout the country because
it's weighted based on where you live, so be more
expensive in New.

Speaker 3 (07:51):
York or California. But around four thousand dollars per dose
is how much they were getting.

Speaker 1 (07:59):
Yeah, the middle. I interviewed a woman who was a nurse.
She wrote a book called Pandemic Nurse, and she was
in Florida, and she said, I wasn't seeing, you know,
the kind of narrative that they were talking about with
the pandemic, and everybody was saying it was all happening
up in New York. So she left and went to
New York to help and set around for a couple
of days before after she told them she was there
before they brought her in. When they finally did bring
her in, she's like, you know, what's going on. They're

(08:21):
not busy either. When they brought her in, physician walked around,
showed the people on the ventilators and said, you know,
about ninety percent of these people are going to die,
and she said it was horrible. They were just killing people.
And of course, when you look at it, if you
get a thirteen percent, if you get a thirteen thousand
dollars bonus for pointing at somebody and saying they got COVID,
they may not even be sick, as you pointed out,
then if you put them on a ventilator, you get

(08:43):
thirty nine thousand dollars already right there, You got fifty
two thousand dollars for a machine that costs you fifty
thousand dollars. And then they will pay you twenty percent
on the charges that you've got for them to use
it until you kill them with that ventilator. And again
pullmonologists were looking at this and back and said, this
never made any sense. We never did it, like, as

(09:03):
you're pointing out, they'd get people antibiotics and things like that,
so we would never put people on a ventilator, you know,
for pneumonia or things like that.

Speaker 3 (09:10):
Exactly.

Speaker 1 (09:11):
All of it was so incredibly corrupt and counterintuitive, and
they turned the hospitals into killing machines for money, and
everybody who's willing to do that. I mean, if you
got somebody this there, and even if it wasn't an
economic emergency that had been created partially by the government,

(09:31):
you know, if you were to tell somebody, you point
to that person and say they've got this condition, I'll
give you thirteen thousand dollars. We know how human nature works,
and we know how the corporate hospitals work. I mean,
the incentives to do that are going to be huge,
just like the disincentives to report somebody when they've had
a reaction to the vaccines are going to be huge

(09:51):
as well. Were you still there when they started the
vaccination program or had you left because you say that
you left when they made the vaccine mandatory, it happened
before that.

Speaker 2 (10:03):
I started to wake up during really when they started
declaring two weeks to flatten the curb and I started
seeing people wearing.

Speaker 3 (10:10):
Masks in public.

Speaker 2 (10:11):
I knew this was not this was not a pandemic
and there was something some kind of psychological operation going
on because I had worked in the hospital for the
swine flu scare and it wasn't a thing in the hospital,
like it was just regular flu. I don't even talked
to people that were on the front lines, like er
doctors and nurses, and they said some of them even

(10:31):
said that they got it and it wasn't.

Speaker 3 (10:32):
That big of a deal.

Speaker 2 (10:33):
So when they declared COVID, I was really suspicious, this
is just going to be another vaccination campaign, because they
already had mandates for the flu shot for healthcare workers
for like a decade before that, and I had been
doing the exemption every year. And the reason I did
that is because the first year that they made healthcare
workers get the flu shot, everybody was getting the flu. Yeah,

(10:55):
And so that was the year that we came up
with the it was just a rumor within the universe
to do lab where I worked, but everybody was saying
it that you get the flu from the flu shot,
so ever since then, I just didn't want to do it.

Speaker 3 (11:06):
So during that whole year of operation work.

Speaker 2 (11:09):
Speed, the only thing that's going to get us back
to normal is this vaccine. I thought this, If the
flu shot never worked, the chances that the covid shot
is going to work is slim to nil. And the
amount of pressure for this one compared to the flu
shot is astronomical, so there's something to it. So that
made me actually not just look at the.

Speaker 3 (11:30):
Covid shot, but look at all the other vaccines.

Speaker 2 (11:32):
And what I learned was they don't teach coders or
doctors or nurses anything about vaccine side effects or adverse effects,
despite the fact that they have codes to assign for
vaccine effects. But I would see patients come in with
like eon beret before this, and the doctors would try
very hard not to relate it to a vaccine, and

(11:55):
there would be codes in there like adverse effect of
flu shot or adverse effect whatever, and those are supposed
to be like a safety signal code, like one of
the reasons why. The ICD ten system, which is owned
by the WHO, by the way, so every member state
that is part of the WHO has to report these codes,
and it's for statistical monitoring purposes. So this is how

(12:17):
they monitor pandemics. This is how they monitor cancer, like
how many cases of cancer there are throughout the world,
or heart problems or pneumonia cases. This is the system
that they use, and it's also supposed to be us
starting in clinical trials for devices and drugs to look

(12:37):
for a safety signal. So I thought, with this COVID
nineteen vaccine, there should be a code for adverse effect
of this shot, and it should be my job to
assign it. So I didn't my due diligence, and I
looked into all the warnings and what could happen if
people got the shot, And then I looked at.

Speaker 3 (12:55):
What could happen if people got the.

Speaker 2 (12:57):
Other vaccines, and I started to realize that they have
been varying all of the effects that people would get
from vaccines and not assigning these adverse effect codes up
until twenty twenty. And then when the COVID nineteen vaccine
came out, there was no code to report it. So
it should have been my job to collect that danger signal.
And I even went on a podcast called Deborah Gets

(13:18):
Red Pill. It was just a radio show in early
twenty twenty one, right after I quit my job.

Speaker 3 (13:24):
And I said, the COVID nineteen vaccine is.

Speaker 2 (13:27):
More dangerous than all of the other vaccines combined. And
that was with my That was just an observation, but
it was ten years of medical coding experience and then
learning what I learned about vaccine side effects and all
the cases that I saw of children in the er
constantly having XMR rashes or even anaphylactic responses, and then

(13:50):
I look at the record. They just got a vaccine,
but the doctor's not connecting the two. So when COVID
nineteen came out, people were having strokes and sephalitis and
blood class like I've never seen before my own card
eyed just they were getting COVID nineteen immediately after getting
the shot, like the same day or the next day,
and then being hospitalized.

Speaker 3 (14:09):
There were people with paralytic.

Speaker 2 (14:11):
Problems, seizure disorders, blood disorders where they couldn't even figure
out what was going on because the patient was plotting
and bleeding at the same time.

Speaker 3 (14:19):
And they didn't even know how to treat it.

Speaker 2 (14:23):
Crazy stuff started happening just in the first four months
of the vaccine rolled out, so it wasn't even available.

Speaker 3 (14:29):
To the rest of the public yet.

Speaker 2 (14:31):
But by summer in twenty twenty one is when they
started saying you at home, like this is the hospital leadership.
They would have videos that they would send to all
staff all the time monitoring COVID and they were really
really pushing us to get that shot. They were saying,
we're not doing as good as the other hospitals who
are getting incentivized for meeting their vaccination quota, and we weren't.

(14:54):
So they were pointing to us, people who worked from home,
who never saw patients, who never walked into a hospital, Well,
you guys are spreading it around society, and we're going
to have to fire you if you don't get your shots.

Speaker 3 (15:07):
So at that point I couldn't take it anymore.

Speaker 2 (15:10):
I knew that my job had been to get them
money for murdering patients, and I was having a crisis
of conscience over that. And then before the vaccine went out,
I decided I was going to be a spy at
that point and just see if the vaccine really was
as bad as old warnings said, and then it turned
out to be far worse than I anticipated. And I

(15:32):
didn't think that the chances would be very good that
I would get an exemption.

Speaker 3 (15:37):
Because they changed the rules for getting an exemption.

Speaker 2 (15:41):
A lot of people got fired, and I didn't want
to work for them anymore. I didn't want to continue
helping them get money to murder people.

Speaker 1 (15:49):
Good for you, Good for you. Yeah, you really do
have You really did have a bird's eye view of
this whole thing, because you're seeing the diagnostic codes as
well as the treatments that are there, and so you
could get a good picture of what was actually coming
on and seeing the trends that were there. That's very

(16:10):
interesting your perspective. You know, I've got something, and I
apologize it because we can't feed this to you, so
you can't hear this. I'll kind of talk about it
and describe it, but I want the audience to hear
what Lutnick. I call him lucky Lucky Lutnick. What he
said in terms about the money that can be made
off of this kind of stuff, and he uses an
example of the vaccines.

Speaker 4 (16:33):
The United States government the most powerful, the greatest customer
buy stuff. We walk in, we're going to buy is
the example I like to use. We're going to buy
two billion COVID vaccines. When we buy it, Faiza and
Maderna stocks are going to triple, going to triple. So
then we say everyone's going to have this vaccine. If

(16:57):
I were after Jared Start negotiated the best daily could
Howard lettnik walked in the room, Howard Letnig would say.

Speaker 1 (17:05):
What do you think twenty percent warrants? Twenty percent warrants right?

Speaker 2 (17:09):
Right?

Speaker 3 (17:10):
What?

Speaker 4 (17:10):
So we'd make fifty billion dollars off of who nobody.

Speaker 1 (17:14):
We didn't take from anybody to do it.

Speaker 4 (17:16):
Okay, the shareholders and Pfizer, who we've just trimpled them
with our order.

Speaker 1 (17:21):
Now, how many of my customers? Yeah, Zoe what he's saying.
Zoe says, yeah, you get the US government's most powerful customers.
So we're going to go in and we're going to
buy two billion dollars worth of these vaccines from Pizer. Moodnna.
We're going to force people to take them. He goes,
So I'm looking at this, I'm saying, well, I'm going
to get some twenty percent warrants. I want some action

(17:42):
of that. I know what's going to happen with all this,
and he says, and you know, and who have we
harmed with all this stuff? It's like the people who
got the shot, obviously, but he doesn't even see that.
He sees nothing but dollar signs. This is the guy,
of course, that is now the Commerce secretary for Trump,
and he's the guy who's pushing through the stable coins
and all the rest of this stuff. Makes you wonder

(18:04):
what he is going to be doing to this with
the stable coins and the resetting of the financial system.
This is These are people who see nothing other than money,
and they don't care what they have to do to
other people in order to make money. It truly is amazing,
the greed and the system and the corruption.

Speaker 2 (18:22):
Right it is so hard for me to wrap my
brain around how many people they killed. It was a
science silent genocide that is still invisible. But there's no
family that I've talked to in the last five years
that hasn't been touched by it in some way. Either
someone they know is suffering from cancer or some horrible

(18:44):
chronic condition after getting the shop, or they've lost somebody
like I lost my cousin who was seventeen, who suddenly.

Speaker 3 (18:52):
Just drove into a tree, and they didn't do.

Speaker 2 (18:54):
An autopsy or look into it. And there's countless other
people out there like that. I mean, this was our family,
and people are still just kind of baring their heads
in the sand and wanting to go on like.

Speaker 3 (19:08):
It didn't happen.

Speaker 1 (19:09):
The amazing system is.

Speaker 3 (19:11):
Still set up to where it could still happen again,
Like we haven't even held those people accountable.

Speaker 1 (19:17):
As a matter of fact, we put them back in
office again. And so you know, that's why to me,
I look at it, and what astounds me the most
is just how effective the control of information has been.
That's why what you're doing is so important. You've got
to get out there and tell people what happened, because,
as you point out, allmost everybody I know as well,

(19:39):
there's been somebody in their family, immediate or extended family
that's been harmed by this. But everybody thinks that this
is a one off, it didn't happen to everybody else.
They don't realize that it happened, how broad this is
and how extensive it is, And I think that they're alone,
just like they wanted us to think that we were
loone if we saw what was happening and we weren't
going to participate in it. Well, you're the one who

(20:00):
thinks like that, and we're not. You know, there's a
lot of people out there who saw what was happening,
and we're onto this scam from the very beginning. And
I had the help of a person who gave me
a heads up about a year before this happened. He said,
there's a lot of chatter about Dark Winter two and
he goes, you know what Dark Winter one was, and
he's like, yeah, I know about that. And so when

(20:22):
I saw this, it was falling right in the pattern
of all these germ games. The very first one was
two months before nine to eleven, So I knew exactly
what was happening with this, and also knew about the
PCR test and what Krrie Mollison said, talk a little
bit about what you saw with the PCR right.

Speaker 2 (20:38):
So that was another part of the Pandora's box that
changed right at the beginning of March twenty twenty when
they declared two weeks to flatten the curve and changed
our whole lives upside down.

Speaker 3 (20:49):
I noticed that before COVID.

Speaker 2 (20:53):
I worked in the University Love when I was in college,
and we had what's called a rapid flu test, and
it was something that it was a nose swap too,
or it could be a saliva swab, but it wasn't
something that went all the way up to your brain
like the COVID PCR swap did, and even the instructions
like us in the lab as lab assistants, the one

(21:14):
of the number one things we did was coach people
on how to collect specimens properly, because it was our
job to screen them make sure they were going to
work for the test, and if they weren't in a
correct format to accept for the test, then we'd have
to tell the nurser doctor we needed to go recollect
that specimen. So these rapid flu tests, they had to
be done within fifteen minutes, and it was basically a

(21:36):
PCR test. It didn't have the same cycle threshold part,
so it was kind of a predecessor to the COVID
nineteen PCR test. But it wasn't done on every patient
that had a cold or flu symptom or a pneumonia
at all.

Speaker 3 (21:51):
It was only done on patients that came in, like
with a recurrent pneumonia that they couldn't cure, or a
recurrent cold, and it would be done to try and
figure out which types of medications this particular disease would
respond to. So it was like a case by case basis.
It wasn't just everybody that walked into the hospital.

Speaker 2 (22:11):
And so when COVID nineteen came around and they said,
you need to stick this all the way up into
people's brains, no.

Speaker 3 (22:17):
Saliva, and it has to be on every single person,
because I mean, it really flipped it. At one point.
It went from you can't get the PCR tests, like because.

Speaker 2 (22:27):
They had a drive through where you could go out
into society at first and you have to go to
one of these PCR testing centers and they'd say you
have to have symptoms.

Speaker 3 (22:36):
You can't get it unless you have symptoms.

Speaker 2 (22:38):
And then people were mad that they couldn't get the
PCR tests. And then like overnight, it flipped to now
everybody has to get it for everything. You have to
get it if you walk in the er, even if
you don't have COVID symptoms, And I thought that was weird.
We never did that before. That is not supposed to
be a screening test. It's supposed to be a diagnostic
test because the screen is done when you don't have symptoms.

(23:00):
It's trying to rule out if you're developing something. And
they were telling us asymptomatic spread. Well, I could see
in the hospital there is no such thing as asymptomatic spread.
This six feet thing is made up. Masks don't work.

Speaker 3 (23:14):
I knew that from the very beginning because.

Speaker 2 (23:17):
Masks in the hospital had only been used for like
collecting spittle over like a surgery case. It wasn't meant
to prevent germ spread. That was never part of our
infection control. So I knew there was something up with
these PCR tests, and I kept looking at the results,
and finally I find that it's done by PCR.

Speaker 3 (23:37):
And I recall my time at a.

Speaker 2 (23:39):
University lab when we were just starting PCR testing, because
this was early two thousands and Mulla's invented it, like
late eighty six is when the NIH took it up
and started using PCR, so it.

Speaker 3 (23:50):
Got into healthcare early two thousands, and all the.

Speaker 2 (23:53):
Texts like my mom was a medical technologist, it was
her job which she actually ran one of these labs.
It was her job to run those tests, and they
were all talking like this was like their new tech,
like they were a kid in a candy store, excited
about it, this PCR thing.

Speaker 3 (24:09):
But it was all genetic testing. It was genetic.

Speaker 2 (24:11):
It was done for cancer screening, which they thought was genetic,
and it was done for like.

Speaker 3 (24:17):
Women that would like they would call it genetic counseling.
If you were a couple.

Speaker 2 (24:22):
And you're a female, and you go and you want
to have genetic counseling, you can see if you have
like a hereditary disease like Huntington's and then maybe decide
if you want to continue with appropriation or not. So
it was genetic. So I thought, why all of a
sudden are we testing for viruses with PCR. Well, while
I wasn't looking because for ten years I was a

(24:45):
medical coder, so I wasn't really looking at what was
going on in the lab until COVID happened. So then
I find it's by PCR, and I start looking at well,
there's obviously this problem with false positives.

Speaker 3 (24:57):
Even Elon Musk was saying, I got two tests in
one day. One of them was negative, one of them
was positive.

Speaker 2 (25:02):
And I could see the hospital was running over and
over and over these PCR tests, waiting to get a
positive result if they didn't get the right result, and
I'm like, this doesn't make any sense. What is going
on here? And fast forward to like after the PCR
test evolved a little bit towards the end of twenty
twenty into twenty twenty one, they had it what's called

(25:25):
a PCR multiplex assay, so it was four different viruses.

Speaker 3 (25:29):
They were actually monitoring flu.

Speaker 2 (25:31):
A, flu B, RSV, and COVID nineteen and the only
one that ever came up positive out of a whole
year of running all four of these viruses was covid,
not one flu, not one RSB.

Speaker 3 (25:49):
And they say, we have an RSB pandemic.

Speaker 1 (25:51):
Now that's such an amazing thing. And you know, we
go back and we used to play the clips all
the time of Malis calling out FAUCI because you know,
FACI used the PCR test claim that AIDS was caused
by a virus, and that created a big back and
forth between them, and Mala said, well, I'm not going

(26:11):
to get involved in that fight, but I'll tell you
this that you can't prove it using the PCR test.
They can't be used as a diagnostics like that, and
so it was very interesting because they also did not
isolate the HIV, you know, the the virus that supposedly
caused AIDS either, and so this whole thing has been
kind of a bluff. What it reminds me of, Zoe

(26:33):
is the polygraph tests. My wife used to be a
district personnel manager for convenience stores, and what they would
do if they would have massive shortages somewhere and they
thought there was theft that was going on with the employees,
they would call them in and polygraph them. And the
polygraph did not work. But it only worked if people
believed that it could tell them tell whether they were lying,

(26:56):
and then they would tell the truth about it and
make a confession. Right. Simply a mind game that was
being played on the people that were there. And that's exactly, Yeah,
that's what the PCR thing is. It really is a
mind game, except that it's become something of a lie
detector for the people who are administering it. We realize
now that they are the liars who are putting this
stuff out. I just had in a comment lance put

(27:17):
up my producer. He said, that video of Lutnik where
he's talking about that reminds him of this scene out
of the Big Short, which we just went back and
watched again because of the AI bubble, And at one
point this guy gets up and he's talking and one
of the guys who's onto the whole scam says, why
is he confessing, And the other guy says, he's not confessing,
he's bragging. Basically what Lutnik was doing. He wasn't confessing

(27:42):
about all this stuff. He was bragging about it. And
now how he continues to get away with this kind
of stuff truly is amazing. Yeah.

Speaker 3 (27:49):
Yeah, Well, what's even more nefarious about the PCR.

Speaker 2 (27:52):
Test is so the false positive narrative that is only
it's about the cycle threshold. But you're correct, they didn't
actually see what. They didn't sequence stars COVID too, so
they never had a sequence. They have what's called a
consensus sequence, which is an average that an AI came
up with, and that's what they've used because they knew

(28:14):
they would find this in a percentage of people and
then they could dial it in with the cycle threshold
up or down. Same thing with the AIDS thing. They
never isolated AIDS, and they used their antibody tests at first,
which could be dialed up or down in the same
way as a cycle threshold. And David Rasnik, PhD, who
I've interviewed, can vouch for that.

Speaker 3 (28:34):
He's got all the science on his web page to
prove all of that.

Speaker 2 (28:38):
But what I was looking past the cycle threshold because
I knew this test is dialed in for some reason,
like they can predict the results somehow, and I needed
to know how they were manipulating the test. And so
I looked a little bit further and I find a
document from the CDC that says for every COVID test,
every CLIA five lab, which.

Speaker 3 (29:00):
Is all of them, they all have to be in
order to build insurance or anything, have to be CLIA certified.

Speaker 2 (29:07):
Then they have to send a genetic sequence to one
of two gene banks, either NCBI or GISAID gene banks,
and it listed like eight different sequences. So they're saying,
you know the variants in the details.

Speaker 3 (29:25):
But if you look at some of these labs that
were running PCR tests and making all the money off
running these PCR tests, they.

Speaker 2 (29:35):
Could also take that same sample off that machine, put
it on another machine run a sequence, and they needed
to in order to comply with the CDC's directive to
send genetic sequences to these gene banks. And I interviewed
David Rasnik, who is a chemistry professor who worked with.

Speaker 3 (29:52):
Kerry Mullis and new Kerrie Mollis.

Speaker 2 (29:54):
I asked them directly, do you think that they were
just clipping a tiny little section of the genetic code
and then sending it to these gene banks or do
you think they were getting the entire sequence?

Speaker 3 (30:06):
And he says, well, they're running a lab.

Speaker 2 (30:09):
They're busy, they're not really thinking about, you know, taking
the time to clit out a sequence.

Speaker 3 (30:15):
So could they yes, but would they really do that?

Speaker 2 (30:18):
No, It'd be so much easier for them to just
send the whole thing and then let the gene bank
decide which part that they want to determine is the
variant of concern.

Speaker 3 (30:29):
So they were. And you look at the different gene banks.
There's one called.

Speaker 2 (30:34):
Data vant which is now a public private partnership. You
look at the Human Genome Project, which is now BGI
BGI Gene Genetics I think in China, which is their
biggest biotech company, and there's billions of billions of dollars
in collecting our DNA, and what they say they're using
it for is to And now we have Larry Ellison

(30:56):
actually admitting it day two of the Trump administration that
they're going to use AI, which is what they use
to get the consensus sequence that they dial the PCR
test in with. They're going to use AI to look
at our blood and then make a drug or a
therapeutic or a vaccine tailored to our individual genome. And

(31:18):
now there's a massive industry of all these big tech
oligarchs that are using AI to develop different vaccines or
different therapeutics, biotech therapeutics tailored to the individual genome.

Speaker 3 (31:30):
So whether or not they're successful.

Speaker 2 (31:32):
With this technology, there's a whole bunch of money invested
in it. So I think PCR was actually a data
mining operation as well as the money laundering operation.

Speaker 1 (31:42):
That's interesting. Yeah, And of course if they want to
make a bioweapon that is going to target certain groups
of people, that makes it very easy to do that
as well. You know, and when you look at the PCR.
Handy who also has a substack and he's been a
regular listener comment or on the program, he worked in
hospital and he said he was suspicious of these things.

(32:03):
Finally got a nurse to take one of these swabs
right out of the package and run it through and
got a positive test without swamping anybody. So some of these, yeah,
it was. It was such garbage. I mean, either it's
preloaded with something or the PCR test is just so
off the charts with its magnification whatever. You can find

(32:23):
anything anywhere carry mallis So.

Speaker 3 (32:25):
Didn't be the president of Tanzania.

Speaker 2 (32:27):
I think he did some like a papaya and like
a Coca cola.

Speaker 1 (32:33):
That's right, it's total nonsense in garbage. And I remember
when they had the con Film Festival. It was in
the summer of twenty twenty, and he had all these
elitists who somehow they got there, I guess on their
private jets and didn't have to get screened too much.
But anyway, they're there and they were complaining that they
had to do spit tests. They said, that's disgusting. We
got to spit in this thing and they got a

(32:54):
test it and so forth. I said, yeah, so why
don't they allow us to do a spit test? Right?
They got ram that thing up your nose but you
don't get that. But the elites, the jet setters, the
private jets, they get the spit test or whatever. Oh
my god, all this stuff.

Speaker 2 (33:11):
In the university lab, there was something called sputum testing,
which is exactly that you basically at hakalugi into a
cup and like it was the most disgusting sample I
ever had to deal with when I worked in the lab,
and I make a joke in my book, we all
were spared that they that they didn't make that the
test that we had to do. But I'm telling me,

(33:35):
that's what the elites do.

Speaker 1 (33:36):
Yeah, I think that's preferable to have that thing ram
rotted up your nose. I guess I didn't have that
done to me, So I went to the whole thing
without having a PCR test. Sorry, go ahead me neither.

Speaker 3 (33:47):
That was another reason why I walked out, because if
I were to stay in the hospital, they are stay
working for them and get the exemption that I was
going to have to take a PCR test every week.

Speaker 2 (33:59):
And I didn't want to have to take a PCR test.
I was pretty sure they were going to be collecting
our DNA with it or sensing if we're vaccinated or
not or somehow tying that in with the vaccine passport.
It wasn't entirely sure how it was going to work,
but I knew that it wasn't what they were telling us,
and I wasn't about to play long.

Speaker 3 (34:17):
Yeah, So that was another reason why I couldn't.

Speaker 1 (34:20):
And of course some of the other things too, where
some people did some you know, zoomed in a microscope
looking at the tip of the swab and said, look
at this. You know, here's one of the cotton swab
and here's this PCR thing. It's got all these spikes
on it. And if I run it across, some of
these things of spikes stick and stay. So are they
actually implanting something into you? You know?

Speaker 2 (34:39):
There's some research on it, and I found there were
two chemicals on the tip of the swab. One of
them was ethylene oxide, and that alone can like they
were putting it, you know, way up in your nose
where you're piny old land is your third eye, which
is right at the top. So putting that chemical right
there is known to cause cancer. And so the more

(35:00):
you do it, the more personogenic it's going to be.

Speaker 3 (35:03):
And then it also has a.

Speaker 2 (35:04):
Chemical property where it will basically block and calcify your
pineal gland, so.

Speaker 3 (35:09):
It like closes your third eye. And it's also a
way that your brain can sense light. It's how your your.

Speaker 2 (35:15):
Body basically like synchronizes hormones throughout your whole body.

Speaker 3 (35:20):
So it can like turn change your whole.

Speaker 2 (35:23):
Endycurrent system if you set off your if you close
or calcify your pineal plan so all sorts of things
could happen just with that one chemical. But I think
there was also graphene oxide on there. There was different
schools that said they have been given the special masks,
even that had graphine in them similar like the exact

(35:44):
same phenomenon about the fibers that actually move and respond
to magnetics.

Speaker 3 (35:49):
Graphine oxide has.

Speaker 2 (35:51):
A magnetic property to it, That's why they wanted to
use it. But it's also supposed to be clean. So
they were saying, like, we're using this to make it
anti bacterial because it has anti bacterial properties. But both
the swabs and some of the masks had graphene fibers

(36:13):
in them that could maybe do that.

Speaker 1 (36:16):
And so if they can't inject the idea what.

Speaker 3 (36:18):
That would do if you shove it off your nose
over and over and over.

Speaker 1 (36:22):
So they can't inject the graphene into you. They can
get it in there another way. And of course I
mentioned this many times too. There's a couple of different batches,
each of them over a million of these shots in Japan,
and they noticed that they were getting black particulates. I
don't know if it happened because they didn't keep them
at the super cold temperatures or whatever, but they noticed

(36:42):
black participants in they particulates, and they said they reacted
with magnets. Yeah, so what is that? But they would
end the story, no more talking about that, and the
Japanese government threw away a couple of million of these
vaccines because of that type of thing. But yeah, there's
there's so many issues there, and people have been lied

(37:04):
to so thoroughly about all the stuff. This is why
it's not a dead issue. It is still alive, and
they're going to try to do all this stuff again,
and since it worked so well, they will use the
same tactics again. That's why it's very important to talk
about these different tactics. And that's amazing.

Speaker 2 (37:21):
Yes, right, they're moving forward with the mRNA. I mean
they're not only putting it in our food. Like we've
probably heard. I'm sure your audience has heard about the
bird flu and how they're doing the self amplifying bird
flue injections for poultry and they're trying to get it
in cattle, and they've had mRNA shots in pork, so

(37:42):
almost all all the pork is tainted now since like
twenty eighteen. Now they're rolling it out for pets. So
now when you go in, you try it, and you
have to get your annual RABY shot for your pets.
Now that's going to be mRNA.

Speaker 3 (37:54):
They're moving over to the m RNA platform for all
the vaccines. Yes, so norm is that who might be
a little like.

Speaker 2 (38:03):
Cautious about COVID nineteen because they've heard the rumors by
now most of them, but.

Speaker 3 (38:07):
They haven't heard that now.

Speaker 2 (38:09):
Your RSV, your flu, and a lot of even like
the childhood vaccines are moving over to this mRNA platform
where they get to bypass clinical trials.

Speaker 3 (38:20):
So it still hasn't been This is an experiment that is.

Speaker 2 (38:23):
Now being rolled out to all our vaccines under the
guise of this is totally fine, this is normal science.
We've totally tested this, but it's absolutely not.

Speaker 3 (38:35):
I mean they've.

Speaker 1 (38:36):
Had that's right.

Speaker 3 (38:37):
People have understood for like three years. Yeah, for the
first one, we just barely passed the first part of monitory.

Speaker 1 (38:45):
That's right. And people need to understand that the guy
who boasted about being the father of the vaccine. First
things he did is you pointed out Stargate thing with
Larry Elison where he's talking about, well, we're going to
use AI to design custom design this for your genetics,
and then we will deliver it with an mr platform.
And the person that they put in as they chose
to put in at the head of the CDC, was

(39:07):
Susan Monirez and that had been what she was working
on with BARDA and with ARPA H and these dark
bioweapon companies that are part of the of the government
and the the military industrial conflicts and the bioweapon platforms
and things like that. That's what. So there's all these

(39:29):
different threads that tie this throughout the Trump administration pushing
m RNA for all these various things. And of course
then broke Rawlins, who's the Agricultural Secretary. She decides on
her own initiative that she's going to end this mass
culling of chickens by authorizing the mRNA bird flu for chickens,

(39:51):
and then they authorize it for other livestock as well.
It is the signals are all there that this is
all still going on, that Trump is right at the
epicenter of all this mr and A stuff. And I
guess what we can call now the m RNAi as
an AI artificial intelligence. It's all connected together, isn't it.

Speaker 2 (40:11):
Absolutely, It's a giant web and it is going to
be tied to our behavior scores and if we comply,
how much we comply with it? Looking at you know,
who's monitoring the DNA where they have to report the
PCR results, to who's hiding the adverse effects of the vaccine?

(40:36):
Putting that all together and looking at where are they
actually where are we reporting all of these PCR results,
and where are we reporting the COVID nineteen case numbers.
And now we actually have a code to report the
COVID nineteen adverse effects, but it's.

Speaker 3 (40:57):
Still not being used. So looking at that and trying.

Speaker 2 (41:02):
To figure out where the code was and why we're
not able to report it still, I happen to find
that every agency involved in monitoring COVID nineteen cases and
vaccination tracking specifically because there's so many vaccine.

Speaker 3 (41:17):
Registries that blows your mind. It's tied to national security.
Oh yeah, so it's a matter of national security if
you participate in this scheme or.

Speaker 1 (41:28):
Yeah, this is all DARPA and it's all the military
and the intelligence agencies and all of the Dark Winter
stuff they had, you know, Fauci and the former head
of the CIA was playing the role of the president
during the first Germ game of Dark Winter. I mean,
it's all the usual suspects that are involved in all
this stuff. It really is a bioweapon that is really

(41:50):
targeted to the population, and it truly is amazing.

Speaker 2 (41:54):
I think they're even going to try and do more
data mining that go even further than PCR testing with
the wearables where rollout that we're getting now because the information,
like when I learned that our COVID nineteen case numbers
the PCR test is actually getting reported to foreign countries

(42:16):
and our DNA is being data mined, and they're able
to tell if we've had a vaccine or not, what's
our ethnicity, where we are, how much money we make.
Like they're layering all of this information and during Operation
work Speed, they had a program called Tiberius, which was
used in hospitals. There's different palanteer programs that are used

(42:38):
in hospitals to monitor and manage the hospital down to
like staffing. There was even a program that was part
of Operation work Speed called HHS Protect and the hospitals
had to report how many ventilators were in use, how
many patients were there.

Speaker 3 (42:54):
I don't know why my camera just stopped. That was weird.

Speaker 1 (42:58):
Well I still have audio, literally, just I didn't do it.
You're that's good, You're back.

Speaker 2 (43:06):
So they had this program that hospitals had to report
how many ventilators, how many patients are in the ICU,
how much rendzivier.

Speaker 3 (43:14):
We were using what's our census report?

Speaker 2 (43:17):
Like all kinds of information that we that even the
hospital didn't want to have to report, in addition to
all the other data mining we were doing.

Speaker 3 (43:24):
And that program was a pallunteer.

Speaker 2 (43:27):
Program called Tiberius, which it's used in Gaza, and that's
the one that they used to assign risk scores.

Speaker 3 (43:36):
Well, they've used that here already in America during.

Speaker 2 (43:39):
Operation Warp Speed to figure out if you were vaccinated
or not to target different ethnic groups for vaccines, and
then to figure out where the counter measures, as in,
where did the ventilators need to go? Where did the
rend deesevir need to go. So they've already had these
programs in place that are tied into our medical records.

Speaker 3 (44:00):
And then to hear Larry Ellison.

Speaker 2 (44:01):
Say we're going to use your medical records and your DNA,
your personal data to design stuff directly to you. And
then in addition they say we're going to put wearables
on you. They're going to monitor your body at all
times for the purposes of national security. And I don't
know how that doesn't send shivers down the spine in

(44:22):
this country.

Speaker 1 (44:23):
Yeah. Absolutely. I mean, we look at their big data
thing that they have to have total information awareness. Remember
how everybody was creeped out about that, and yet that
is what this really is. The implementation of this. The
big data is looking at everything that you're doing, not
just online, but they've got to get it out of
cyberspace into physical space with all these other aspects of it.
And companies like Palanteer they have been focused on geospatial

(44:47):
intelligence and data mining and making all these drawing all
these conclusions about people's politics or religion so forth, based
just on even geospatial intelligence. When they get to additional
factors like this, they know everything about you and we're
not allowed to know anything about what they do or
the results. That's why it really is, at its essence

(45:09):
that is an information war, because you know, it is
all the information that's flowing in one direction, and they
have an insatiable appetite to know everything about everybody. It
is part and parcel of their control, this total knowledge
about everyone and everything. And now AI and especially companies
like Palanteer have given them the ability to go through

(45:32):
and collate this massive amount of data that they've been
collecting for some time. Now they can make sense of it.
Because it was so much information they've been collecting on people,
they couldn't sort through it with humans, and so now
they've got the AI that can sort through this. That
is what's so concerning about all of this, And it really.

Speaker 3 (45:50):
Is because when you go on social media and you're
fed an algorithm of like which which posts do you
get to see today? That's going to be how are
our whole lives run?

Speaker 2 (46:00):
And I don't know how many people I've known complain
about their algorithm.

Speaker 3 (46:04):
Oh it's just it's.

Speaker 2 (46:05):
Triggering me today or I don't know why my algorithm's
all screwed up and it's showing me blah blah. Well,
imagine if that same algorithm is now your government gets
to make decisions about if you're a good person or not,
and if you get to go out today, or if
you get to eat today, or if you get to
use your money today.

Speaker 1 (46:20):
Yeah, that's right. Yeah, it's all about total control. And
of course that guy Lucky Loutnik, Howard Lutnik, who is
bragging about how much money he can make knowing that
the government was going to just flood cash into these
pharmaceutical companies. Now I can go in and I can
make money off of that. Right, So he's got this
insider information. He's the guy that's going to be doing

(46:42):
the new public private version of a CBDC. And once
they know all your financial transactions, all the rest, any
part of this puzzle would give them pretty much total
control over your life. But they've got so many different
facets where they are monitoring and information about you that

(47:02):
it truly is just overwhelming to even try to think
about it. But again, it's the ignorance and the darkness
that they have fooled everybody with. That's why it's so
important what you're doing. And again the site is thrill
Kill medicalcult dot com. And you're also on substack and

(47:22):
people find that at Zowe dot substack dot com. And
it's very important for people to use this information try
to wake people up as to what's going on. They've
not only hidden stuff from people, but they have in
terms of inoculation. The one thing they've inoculated you against
is the truth, and they've inoculated you against questioning what

(47:45):
they tell people. And that's why you need to try
to wake people up with sites like Zoe's as well.
So is there anything else that you would like to hit.

Speaker 3 (47:55):
I just if anyone is interested.

Speaker 2 (47:58):
I'm going to be doing arial for the people that
we've lost to hospital protocols and vaccine injured, including women
who may have had a stillbirth or a miscarriage.

Speaker 3 (48:13):
Due to the shot. So if you go to my website,
there's a page called vigil and if.

Speaker 2 (48:20):
You'd like to submit a name of a loved one,
you don't have to tell us anything more, just the
name of a loved one. You could even just put
you know, baby boy, or baby Girl if you like,
and we're going to be lighting a candle in remembrance
of your loved ones.

Speaker 3 (48:37):
So if you like, please go and submit a name
and we will.

Speaker 1 (48:40):
Honor your lost It's important. We cannot forget what they've
done to us, and we cannot forget those that they
have killed. That's absolutely vital. Thank you so much for
what you do. Again, Zoe Smith. Her website is Thrill
Kill Medical Cult dot com and you can find her
on substack at Zoe dot substack dot com and she's

(49:02):
felled Zoe z Owe. Thank you so much for joining us.
We take a quick break, folks, and we will be
right back. Stay with us.

Speaker 3 (49:25):
M H.

Speaker 1 (49:56):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 4 (50:00):
Here News now at apsradionews dot com or get the
APS Radio app and never miss another story.

Speaker 1 (50:09):
Well, let's take a look at the AI bubble, and
of course it's kind of interesting. Soft Bank. You know,
we were just talking about Stargate project Larry Ellison and
the bank that came in was this Japanese bank called
soft Bank. They're very much invested in technology issues and
that was what Trump kicked off his second administration with well.

(50:32):
Soft Bank dumped every single share of Nvidia, and that
had an effect on the entire market, not just on
Nvidia stock. Remember we talked about Michael Burry, the guy
behind the the who sussed out big short who sussed
out what was going on the market, real estate market

(50:55):
fraud and bubble, and he focused on shorting in video
as well as Palenteer. And so we've had a lot
of big players and people who are very professional, very savvy,
who are calling bubble and so in Video went down
by one and a half percent after soft Bank sold

(51:16):
all of their shares, and and then of course Pollenteer
is also going down. And Volenteer was really the biggest
bet that Michael Burry, of the big short put on.
It was actually when he did the big short of
over a billion dollars, which is like eighty percent of
his company or his fond or whatever. So eighty four

(51:36):
percent of that short was Palenteer and fourteen percent or
sixteen percent was the in Vidia And somebody put this
up in verse Kramer. So look at Kramer as being
a contra indicator of what they should invest in. The
said Jim Crater. Jim Kramer. Kramer remains undefeated and so

(51:57):
what they have there is a suite that he put
out as recently as the twenty ninth of October, and
he was saying, I'm taking my price target for Pollenteer
from two hundred to two hundred and fifty exclamation mark.
Well it went from two hundred when he said that
down to now about maybe one hundred and sixty five
one hundred and seventy. As I said, he remains undefeated

(52:19):
as always being the counter indicator of where things should go.
And you know, when I look at all of this
hype about AI robots, so we got from Elon Musk
last week and so many others, you know, the AI hype,
the robotic hype and everything. This is Russia and their
robot that they wanted to demonstrate. Again, we always hear

(52:40):
about Russian bots, right, they're talking about AI that is
putting out narratives on social media, But here's a literal
Russian bot and people's comments are about this. It looks like
they used a drunk to teach us robot how to walk.
So that's walking there, that's what happens. Takes another couple

(53:01):
of steps and just like a drunk, it falls down
on the side watches. It's coming staggering that goes down.
So let's hope that that is a metaphor for robotics
and for AI. Again, as I said last week, a
lot of people are looking at this and they said, well,
you know what, how does this end. Well, there's only
two or three combinations of this that could go. Either

(53:25):
the AI hype and the bubble bursts and takes down
the economy big time or global economy big time, or
it is successful and it takes everybody's jobs. And I said, well,
there's a third alternative that it is sustained by the
governments who use it to control us. And I think

(53:46):
that is true of both AI and robotics. I think
that the best use case for all this stuff is
tyranny and totalitarianism. Well, soft Bank dumped their entire Nvidio stake,
but they're not getting out of AI completely, so it's
not a complete pushback against AI. They just decided that

(54:09):
they would move from Nvidia to some other platforms. They
are still involved in AI, and they had just under
six billion dollar steak in Nvidia. And the guy who
is the head of soft Bank, his name is go To.
I guess he's the go to guy, if you want

(54:30):
some tech capital. I can't say if we're in an
AI bubble or not, said go to adding that the
sale was for capital and can be utilized for our financing.
So he's not going to say that we're in an
AI bubble because he's got some other irons in the
fire and he doesn't want to tank this thing. I
can neither confirm nor deny that we are in an
ALI bubble. Yeah, but a lot of people have been

(54:53):
confirming that. As a matter of fact, Zero Hedge pointed out, said, well,
we've had four recent articles that are really must read.
Here's ahead lines the AI bubble watchout Metric has just snapped.
AI is now a debt bubble too, quietly surpassing all
banks to become the largest sector in the market. And

(55:15):
Sam Altman denying open AI needs a government bailout. He
just wants massive government subsidies. So yeah, we do the
subsidies so we don't have to do the bailout. So
it had in fact the course on Nvidio, but also
on a lot of different stocks. The futures slid down
as AI jitter's return, and yet no matter how many

(55:38):
people come out, no matter how many people who are
large and connected come out against this, you still have
the bubble continues to inflate. And another company was involved
in that as well, core Weave. They rent out access
to the AI chips and they had some interesting issues

(55:58):
there and setbacks as well. But this article from Free
Thought Project is very timely. They said it is time
to pay attention. Europe has just eviscerated monetary privacy and
it's going to be coming here to the United States next.
They're basically starting down the path of banning all cash,

(56:18):
state run digital money. That's the law that has passed
and it goes live in only four hundred days, and
so they're going to make it criminal to pay cash
for anything over ten thousand euros. But of course that
level is going to continue to come down. That's why
you need to get into physical gold and silver. You've
got to get out of this system, and that's what
they're talking about. They have a lot of different alternatives

(56:40):
in this Freethought Project article. One thing they don't mention,
strangely enough, is physical gold and silver. I think that
is the simplest, easiest, most direct thing to essentially short
the tautalitarianism that's what you need to be doing. Don't
short the market. Short that tatalitarianism. Go to David Knight,
Dye Gold. I'll take you to Tony Ones Wise Wolf Gold.

(57:01):
Have a good day. Thank you for joining us the
common Man. They created common Core and dumbed down our children.
They created common past track and control us. They're Commons

(57:24):
project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the
communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in
the image of God. That is what we have in common.

(57:45):
That is what they want to take away. The most
powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's
time to turn that around and expose what they want
to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find

(58:05):
at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank
you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please
keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Ruthie's Table 4

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}The Pandemic Incentive System

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Ruthie's Table 4

The Joe Rogan Experience

All Episodes

The Pandemic Incentive System

On Purpose with Jay Shetty