Thu Episode #2138: Panama Drills and the Prospect of a Venezuelan War

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act.

Speaker 2 (00:35):
It's the David Knight Show.

Speaker 3 (00:44):
As the clock strikes thirteen, It's Thursday, the thirteenth of November.
You have of our Lord twenty twenty five. Well, yesterday
we had a back and forth with the Epstein files.
Democrats released some documents selectively. The Republicans are furious that
you're trying to smear Trump, and so what they did

(01:06):
they released a large number of emails that have been
obtained from the Epstein accounts, and there's actually what they
wound up doing is hanging themselves a little bit more
kind of funny. But we're going to take a look
at the other aspects of the blame game over the shutdown,

(01:27):
what is being proposed with the insurance issues that are there.

Speaker 2 (01:31):
And we're going to.

Speaker 3 (01:32):
Look a little bit deeper at what Trump did on
Tuesday on Veterans Day, bringing in an al Qaeda Isis
al Nustra, Syrian persecutor of Christians and other minorities throughout Syria.
This mass murdering terrorists is now our guy, as they've

(01:53):
always been and honored on Veterans Day by Donald Trump.
This is the lunacy of geopolitics. Folks, we'll be right back. Well,
the Epstein files, you deserve the full truth. So the

(02:14):
House GOP suddenly dropped twenty thousand pages of Epstein docs,
things that they were so eager to keep quiet. And
of course there's more information that is out there that
will be part of this release. After Mike Johnson has
delayed and delayed and delayed. Remember they take the entire
month of August off anyway, and he added another week

(02:36):
to that just so that there wouldn't be a release
of these documents. But the Democrats released selectively a few
documents that got the White House very upset, and so
they had the Republicans start to release this other stuff
because you know, that's regardless of what is in it,
and of course we've already found some other things in it.

(02:57):
The key issue is that's a long time time ago.
We were trying to do research in the state of
North Carolina and we were trying to get information about
things that are being spent on various other things, and
so we did a freedom of information request and rather
than respond to what we had asked for, what they

(03:18):
did was they gave us a massive document dump is
that here sort through this. That's one way that you
can hide things, right. You can hide things by keeping
it all secret, keeping it all hidden, or you can
release a massive dump of information that takes forever for
people to go through it if they can find it
at all. So, Republicans on the House Oversight Committee released

(03:42):
twenty thousand additional documents from Epstein's estate on Wednesday, proclaiming
you deserve the full truth, just hours after Democratic colleagues
published emails by Epstein referencing Trump. The response came after
the White House and House Republicans accused Democrats of select
actively releasing emails in order to slander the president. Well

(04:05):
soon established a fact of what Donald Trump was when
you look at somebody that's been involved with the trainee
stuff from the very beginning, all the shenanigans that he
did with his beauty contests that are now very well documented,
all the many accusations of sexual assault, the realities of

(04:26):
the sequential marriages, as well as other than the fact
that divorce is very common in our society now, but
it's not common for people to publicly humiliate their x
as he does, as he does with his former cabinet members,
as well. I don't know, how do you slander somebody

(04:46):
who has already got an established.

Speaker 2 (04:48):
Character like that.

Speaker 3 (04:49):
They said, you cherry picked these things, because what they
did was they released this particular email here which you see.
This is between Jeffrey Epstein and Glainne Maxwell.

Speaker 2 (05:01):
G max is what she's referred to.

Speaker 3 (05:03):
I want you to realize is that the dog that
hasn't barked as Trump, the victim spent hours at my
house with him. He has never been mentioned by the
police chief, etc. I'm seventy five percent of the way there,
he says, So what was the victim that is there? Well,

(05:24):
the Republicans are saying that that was redacted by the Democrats.
They said, the person that was referenced there was Virginia Guthrie.
And they said and by taking out that name, Virginia Guthrie,
they did that deliberately because they wanted to make it
sound like Trump was doing something to the victim. In

(05:48):
other words, they put redacted there and then they wrote
the word victim. But Virginia Guthrie has publicly said that
she never witnessed wrongdoing by President Trump. So what they're
saying is is that you know, by redacting her name.
They made it look like he had victimized somebody.

Speaker 2 (06:09):
Who was there.

Speaker 3 (06:11):
Not to say that he is innocent any means, but
he might be not guilty of that particular innuendo. Caroline
Lovitt argued that the Democrats had selectively leaked emails to
liberal media to create a false narrative to smear Trump.
I don't think Trump participated in anything. Now she's the

(06:33):
one who is lying. He was there for the longest time. Actually,
American House Hippo has a channel on YouTube, the Bad
Civil Servant, and I thought he had a particularly good
solution to all this for Donald Trump. As he was talking.

Speaker 2 (06:54):
About the fake news.

Speaker 4 (06:56):
The terminator to you that nobody named Jeffrey Epstein has
ever existed. Elon must just got back from the time
travel portal at the Pentagon. It's the greatest time portal ever.
Cost one hundred quintillion dollars. It's all in the big
beautiful bill.

Speaker 5 (07:12):
Read it.

Speaker 4 (07:12):
It's there. Foreign countries are going to pay for it
with tariffs. So Elon went back in time, killed Epstein's granddad,
killed his grandma too, stuck some ketamine in him from behind.
It was the greatest surprise time travel killing. Ever, then
Elon came back. On the way back, he stopped at
a McDonald's in Canada. Elon's Canadian too, You know, don't

(07:34):
know how he speaks such fantastic English, coming from both
South Africa and Canada.

Speaker 3 (07:43):
That's very funny. I like that a lot. And it
goes on quite a bit. And he's got several AI
videos that he's put up there. His channel is the
Bad Civil Servant on YouTube mes American House Hippo. We
all know from the comments here in Rumble White House's
name Epstein, victim Virginia Guthrie, who the email says spent

(08:04):
hours with Trump in an explosive response to a Democrat
quote smear campaign. And so again, if there's nothing there,
why are they so hell bent on hiding it and
taking so much damage?

Speaker 2 (08:20):
You know.

Speaker 3 (08:21):
One of the things that we're going to take a
look at is some exposise done by one news organization
and nobody else has picked this stuff up. And this
is the fourth series that they've done. Each of these
series has shown the very very close ties that Epstein
had to both Israeli an American intelligence, which is what

(08:44):
alex Acosta had set when he was told the truth.
Now he has recanted that and contradicted himself, and we
know that that was what was happening, and we know
that's why he got off. And perhaps that is why
Trump is trying to hide all these documents. And yet,

(09:04):
if he hung around with this guy for fifteen years
and if he knew what was going on, of course
he did, because Jeffrey Epstein said that he says he
knows about the girls. It's part of these emails at released.
He knows about the girls. He told Glane to lay
off and you know, to stop it or whatever. And
so you can look at that and say, well, maybe
he was upset about that and did not want them

(09:27):
doing it, or maybe the aspect of it was he
was already had mentioned several times that he was upset
about the fact that his employees are being poached off
of mar Lago by Jeffrey Epstein. And that's, of course,
is where Virginia Guthrie came from. She was working at
it as a spa attendant at mar Lago in two

(09:48):
thousand when she was sixteen years old, and that's where
they recruited her.

Speaker 2 (09:54):
And so he said to lay off the girls.

Speaker 3 (09:56):
And yet one of the other things that came out,
and I won't go into do it and detailed because
the language used. But he also had Michael Wolfe, who
is also included a lot of these emails, a lot
of emails between Michael Wolfe and Glaine Maxwell and I'm sorry,
between Michael Wolfe and Epstein and Epstein and Glaine Maxwell.

(10:17):
And one of the things that Wolfe said was that
they had a particular name for their partnership in order
to get girls for Prince Andrew. There was a partnership
there between Trump and Epstein, and so I don't believe
that when he says he told him to stop with

(10:37):
the girls. I don't think that it had anything to
do with him having any kind of moral compunction about
getting underage girls, because that was what they were involved
in doing for Prince Andrew. And another email between Epstein
and wolf in January twenty nineteen, the convicted sex offender
refers to his expulsion from Trump's Marlago club. He said,

(10:58):
Trump said he asked me to resign, said Epstein, I
was never a member ever. Of course he knew about
the girls as he asked to Glaine to stop. So
December fifteenth, twenty fifteen, Wolf wrote to Epstein on the
subject line heads up the day of Republican primary debate

(11:18):
televised by CNN. He said, I hear CNN planning to
ask Trump tonight about his relationship with you, either on
air or in the press scrum. Afterwards, Wolf wrote to Epstein,
if we were able to craft and answer for him,
what do you think it should be?

Speaker 2 (11:37):
Epstein?

Speaker 3 (11:38):
Wolf responded, I think you should let him hang himself.
If he says he hasn't been on the plane or
to the house, then that gives you valuable pr and
political currency. In other words, he has been on the plane,
he has been to the house many many times. He said,
you can hang him in a way that potentially generates
a positive benefit for you, or if it really looks

(12:00):
like he could win, you could save him generating a debt.
Of course, it is possible, but when asked, he'll say,
Jeffrey is a great guy and has gotten a raw
deal and is a victim of political correctness, which is
to be outlawed in a Trump regime. So, after all
this happens and the Republican said, you just selectively released

(12:25):
some information there, what was Trump's reaction? When the Republicans
released twenty thousand documents from the Epstein estate twenty thousand emails,
Trump's response was to toll him to stop it, don't
release anything else. He was not happy about that. I
thought they were defending him. But again, you have a

(12:47):
four year old tweet that comes back to haunt JD.
Vance after the new Trump Epstein revelation. And again, you
know what if JD. Vance could go back in time travel, right,
what would he get rid of? Maybe this tweet? So
September fourth, twenty twenty one, long before he was in

(13:08):
any conversations to become Trump's running mate. In twenty twenty four,
Vance said I think about this column by Matthew Walter
about once a month, and he had a link to
the column and published in the week. It was titled
the Jeffrey Epstein Cases Why people Believe in Pizzagate. Vance
also included a reply to his own posts, saying, remember

(13:31):
when we learned that our wealthiest and most powerful people
were connected to a guy who ran a literal child
sex trafficking ring, and then that guy died mysteriously in jail,
and now we don't talk about it. Walter's opinion piece
posted July eighth, twenty nineteen. Pose the question was Trump

(13:52):
speaking from personal experience when he said in two thousand
and two that Epstein likes beautiful women as much as
I do, and many of them are on the younger side. Well,
back in twenty sixteen, Vance was a never Trumper, going
so far as to famously call the President America's hitler.
But then, of course that was before the match made

(14:13):
in Hell by Peter Teel and the technocrats. So again,
Jeffrey Wolf, you see, was advising Jeffrey Epstein. Both of
them knew what was happening. I gotta say, it's really
going to grab a bag of popcorn, because it's going
to be very interesting when this lawsuit between Wolf and

(14:35):
Millennia Trump goes through Discovery, is going to be very
very interesting. Well, there's also one person that put up
some pictures I thought, what kind of interesting showing the
similarity between the redecoration of the Oval Office and Jeffrey
Epstein's house. It is truly amazing, exactly the same kinds

(15:00):
of decorations on the walls, the gilded decorations Epstein's Manhattan
residents and the Oval Office. These two guys were basically
twins separated at birth, Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump. Actually
they were separated later by real estate greed. Both of

(15:21):
them won the same property. Well, I was talking about
what maybe the real motivation, the biggest motivation perhaps for
Trump is to cover up for the intelligence agencies, especially Massad.
And this is an article by a site called drop
site News. Israeli spy stayed for weeks at a time

(15:43):
with Jeffrey Epstein and Manhattan. In mid October, the House
Oversight Committee released an interview with former US Prosecutor Alex Acosta,
the guy who, as I said, was the one that
was there in Florida suppose prosecuting Jeffrey Epstein, but essentially
gave him an unbelievable sweetheart deal and let him off.

Speaker 2 (16:07):
And he was.

Speaker 3 (16:09):
One of ninety two such federal attorneys. And out of obscurity,
somehow Donald Trump picks this guy to be his labor secretary.
And he was asked at that time, you know, why
did you do such an easy well, why did you
do this sweetheart deal? And he said, well, I was

(16:30):
told that Epstein was intelligence, I need to lay off. Well,
that really blew up big. And now he is denying that.
Alex Acosta told the panel in October that, contrary to
widespread public reporting, he had never told Steve Bannon that
Epstein belonged to intelligence. Actually he told that to Congress.

(16:51):
Acosta denied ever discussing with Epstein with Bannon, claimed to
have no knowledge as to whether he was or was
not a member of the intelligence community. Lying yet again.
And so the new cache of documents from Epstein's estate
shows some information about how yes, he really was and

(17:15):
whatever alex Acosta said, the documents say that he was.
So you have a senior Massad I think he was
a lieutenant commercial colonel who had links to Leon Panetta,
and he lived at Epstein's house on multiple stretches from

(17:36):
twenty thirteen to twenty sixteen. And these leaks of emails
that also came out from former Prime Minister Ahoud Barock
of Israel. And so if you cross reference these new
emails with others from Ahoud Barock, it shows that Epstein

(17:57):
was at the nexus, says drop Site News. Epstein was
at the nexus of high ranking intelligence agencies in the
US and Israel. And this is the fourth piece that
they've done on this, and the first piece drop site
News showed that Epstein was brokering a deal with Israel

(18:17):
and Mongolia. The second piece, they showed that Epstein had
set up a back channel between Russia and Israel during
the Syrian War. And the third piece they showed Epstein
was the facilitator of a security agreement between Israel and
the Ivory Coast. And they ask, why is it that

(18:38):
nobody else in the media is reporting this. Your time
is up. I think we know the answer, don't we. Yeah,
who's controlling the media?

Speaker 2 (18:51):
Here?

Speaker 3 (18:52):
Just one example, you had a hud Barak sending an
email to this in it Colonel Karen or Coorn, I
should say ko r e n. And in it it
was kind of interesting. He said, I had to leave
town because I want you to return those red earbuds
to the Apple store. And he said, they won't give

(19:14):
me credit unless you use my credit card. So here's
my you know, take my credit card and get that return.
That email was in English. All the other emails between
ahu Barak and this lieutenant colonel had been in Hebrew,
and so he tells him to return that in English,

(19:35):
and then the other guy, Coorn, replies in Hebrew, what's
her name? What's her name? You know, the red headphone
that he wants returned and paid off. So and he
replies in Hebrew, he says, Rachel Levin. I just about
fell out of the chair when I saw that that's

(19:56):
the name of that trenny that was the deputy assistant
HHS under Biden. Remember the guy went by the name
Rachel Levin. I hope it's not the same person. That'd
be really ultra creepy, wouldn't it. But anyway, I confirmed
that it was a woman that they were talking about.
And then afterwards he sends them another email in English.

(20:20):
He says, keep the card. And so as soon as
Barack Ahood Barack landed in Tel Aviv, he sent another
message via email said we need to speak on the
phone right away. And then Ahood Barack became head of
the Israeli Defense Force, their army, and Corn became his

(20:42):
liaison to the Pentagon, the people like Colin Powell and
so forth. And throughout all of this, Ahood Barack's counterpart
was leon Panetta, who was very connected in all these emails.
Leon Panetta had been with the CIA, and then he
goes to become the Secretary of Defense. So Ahu Barrock

(21:03):
was the Prime Minister of Israel and involved in these
the skull and dagger stuff, and then he becomes head
of the Israeli army. Leon Panetta was CIA and then
becomes head of the American military, and the two of
them were constantly working together, and Leon Panetta helped to

(21:25):
get a ten year, thirty eight billion dollar gift to Israel. Yeah,
that's where this stuff is all headed. This is why
when you look at this, folks, it's an outrage what
Epstein and Trump were doing, just immediately when you look
at the trafficking of miners and their parties that they

(21:47):
were doing and what the purpose of that was. But
it's that's just the front end of all this, and
the back end is all this corruption and the interconnection
of Trump with Israel, Israeli intelligence. And you want to
know who owns this guy? He is a shill for them.
It's absolutely unbelievable what a shill he is. And so

(22:09):
we're going to take a quick break and we will
be right back, and Travis, I guess we'll be joining
us soon.

Speaker 6 (22:16):
I'm here.

Speaker 3 (22:16):
Oh he's here already. Well, welcome, Travis. Good to have
you on today. Travis is joining us from Austin, Texas,
where he is for about a week or so. And
if you want to if you want to cover the
comments here with only a couple of them here, if
you want to go through those.

Speaker 6 (22:35):
Let's see and looking for them right now.

Speaker 3 (22:39):
You don't have them yet. We're going to take a
quick break, folks, and we will be right back.

Speaker 2 (23:34):
Joy listening to the.

Speaker 1 (23:35):
David Knight Show, Elvis, the Beatles.

Speaker 7 (23:43):
And the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the
Oldies Channel at APS radio dot com.

Speaker 3 (23:51):
Well, Trump has been on a pardoning spree.

Speaker 2 (23:55):
Well, su Yeah, he's excusing.

Speaker 3 (24:02):
A lot of people, and a lot of very bad
people and very bad conduct. Now, one aspect of this
is he just excused Rudy Giuliani, and I guess Rudy
Giuliani is no longer his sweating hair dye over this
because of his pardon. Except the problem is is that
the people like Rudy Giuliani and Mark Meadows and Sidney

(24:24):
Powell and many others are not really facing federal charges.
They're facing state charges. And so this is really.

Speaker 6 (24:32):
What Trump had to pardon. Trump had to parton Giuliani.
He thinks about that, you know, wonderful romantic moment they
had with Giuliani, and Drag gets all mushy about it. Oh,
I have to pardon Giuliani.

Speaker 3 (24:44):
Yeah, we're going to see that at mar Lago. Maybe
Giuliani and her beauty contest. Maybe Trump can do a
beauty contest for older trainees and we could have Rudy
Giuliani in it as well.

Speaker 6 (24:57):
But Giuliani, what a beautiful woman he is.

Speaker 2 (25:00):
This is.

Speaker 3 (25:02):
Really just an optics that he's putting out there to
give them full, complete and unconditional.

Speaker 2 (25:08):
Pardon when they're not charged.

Speaker 3 (25:10):
You know, it's kind of interesting because he could have
done that for the Jay sixers, but he didn't do that,
right and you heard all these Trump apologists saying he
can't pardon people before they're charged with anything. Well, he
just pardoned Rudy and these other people before they were charged.
Biden did it for Hunter. But you know, as I
said before, when we go back to the Insurrection Act

(25:31):
that was at the center of all this back and
forth Republicans and Democrats in January sixth, that was put
in after the Civil War. They wanted to come after
people who had fought for the Confederacy and the president
at the time, Andrew Johnson said we're not going to
continue down this road, and he issued a blanket pardon
for everybody who had fought with the Confederacy. Trump could

(25:52):
have done the same thing with January the sixth. And
it wasn't even just that. In more recent history, we
had Gerald Ford, who had pardoned Richard Nickson and before
he was ever indicted for anything after Nixon resigned. And so,
as a matter of fact, I saw somebody quote Gerald
Ford at the end of this shutdown. They said, our long,

(26:13):
our prolonged national nightmare has finally ended, or something to
that fact. It was an exact quote of the words
that Jeryl Ford had said when he pardoned Nixon. You know,
we're going to move on from this. So the proclamation
is about people who were never charged federally over the
election issues. Trump's continued efforts to promote the idea of

(26:37):
the twenty twenty election was stolen from him, even though
courts around the country and Trump's own attorney journal at
the time found no evidence of fraud.

Speaker 2 (26:47):
And this is the Associated Press sing this. And then.

Speaker 3 (26:52):
Ed Martin, the Department of Justices point man on pardons
and a former lawyer for J six defendants, tweeted out
on x he said, no Maga left behind. Really, all
the J sixers were left behind to twist in the wind,
to be persecuted by Biden, to be sent to prison,

(27:13):
many of them tortured, you know, long times and solitary
confinement and actually beaten by the guards in many cases.
Also pardoned were Sidney Powell, John Eastman, another lawyer who
pushed a plan to keep Trump in power, and Jeffrey Clark,
a former Justice Department official who championed Trump's efforts to

(27:36):
challenge his election loss. Well, Glayne Maxwell is seeking a
commutation and the documents have now been released to show
that she's expecting to be pardoned. And of course p
Diddy also, you know, especially if you are a if
you're a sex offender, some kind of a predator, somebody

(27:58):
with connections to intelligence, you go to the front of
the list, along with the people who are friends of
Gerald Kushner and real criminals who deserve to be in prison.
One of the things that bothered me so much at
the end of Trump's reign the first time, and a
lot of things are bothering me the whole January, the

(28:19):
sixth thing bothered me to stop and steal and the
save America griffs that were there. But at the very end,
the fact that there were a lot of political prisoners,
that there was some hope that he might that people
in his regime might pardon because it had already been
a pardon of those ranchers that were at the center
of the malheir standoff, and they were railroaded over fake

(28:46):
charges of arson and things like that that the BLM
had come against them for. And there were hopes that
other people who had been locked up for political reasons
would be released in pardon along like Ross Albrich, for example,
who was not pardoned until Trump wanted to make common
cause with the crypto community and promised to do that.

(29:08):
But there are many people, you know, Francis Schaeffer, Cox,
I had Marty Gottisfeld. Many people who are political prisoners
really deserve to be pardoned. But instead what he did
was he pardoned people like this creep. This felon who
was freed by Trump has now been sentenced again, this
time to twenty seven months in prison. A Brooklyn federal

(29:31):
judge found that Jonathan Brawn had violated the rules of
his release by sexually assaulting a nanny. Did you know
that when you're released as a prisoner, that's one of
the things you're not supposed to do. You're not supposed
to do that, even if you're not on parole. He
swung an iv pole at a nurse. He beat other people,
including a child, and he dodged the tolls in his

(29:53):
luxury cars. Evidently he has both a Ferrari and a Lamborghini.
But he couldn't be bobbed to pay the four dollars
at the tolls, so he would run through skip through
those things. And it's kind of interesting what he did.
He was a Long Island drug dealer. And when I
looked at all this stuff, I thought, as I started

(30:14):
reading this guy and his connections to people, he was
threatening people in a synagogue and beating people in a synagogue,
and he Jewish himself, I thought, I bet he's a
friend of the Kushner crime family. He sounds exactly like
one of them.

Speaker 2 (30:30):
And lo and behold.

Speaker 3 (30:31):
And I wrote that in my comments here because I
just I like to read this stuff without and make
my comments when I make my first pass through it
and I get about tow or three pages into it,
and sure enough, it was his connections to Jared Kushner
and the Kushner crime family that got him the pardon
in the first place.

Speaker 6 (30:50):
Recent conviction and herojuana drug dealer being friends with the
Kushner family is a little funny. It's a little funny.

Speaker 2 (30:59):
Yeah, I don't know. I don't get that reference.

Speaker 6 (31:01):
But cush is slaying for marijuana, is it okay?

Speaker 2 (31:05):
Well, I didn't know that.

Speaker 8 (31:06):
I doubt it was marijuana that he was selling.

Speaker 3 (31:09):
Well, they say it was, and they say that he
got it out of Canada. And I read that, I wrote,
I said, well, maybe this is where Trump that got confused.
It wasn't fentanyl, but it was marijuana that was coming out.
It was people who were friends with the Kushner family.
So that's I guess what was in the back of
his mind there the recent conviction of Jonathan Brown, a

(31:30):
drug dealer pardoned by Trump for molesting his children's nanny,
sexually molesting by the way, and threatening a synagogue congregant.
Braun has been accused of numerous violent incidents since his release,
including assaulting a toddler and a man at a Shabbat dinner.

Speaker 2 (31:49):
Again the Krishner Jewish mafia. That's there.

Speaker 3 (31:54):
You know, Will Trump pardoned p Diddy and Maxwell. Well,
it seems perfectly in character for the kinds of people
that he's been pardoning out there. Jonathan Brown, now forty one,
landed a twenty seven month sentence for violating the terms
of his presidential pardon with fresh new crimes. And there

(32:15):
is a disgusting, disgusting description here of what he actually
did to the nanny. If you want to read it,
you can read it yourself, but I'm not going to
read it to you. His victim was so upset with
us that she dialed into Monday's sentencing hearing by phone,

(32:36):
and she asked the prosecutors to read her victim impact
statement in court for her because she couldn't read it
she was too upset by it. She said that she
had endured deep emotional trauma that left her quote with
lasting trust issues, and added that she was quote grateful
that justice had been served unquote. Her disturbing assault was

(32:57):
just one of a string of violent incidents that this
person Trump pardon has been accused of since his release.
He was serving a ten year sentence and Trump pardoned
him at the behest of the Kushners, after doing only
three years of the ten year sentence. He was first

(33:18):
busted in twenty ten for orchestrating a major cannabis distribution,
ring millions of dollars worth of weed from Canada.

Speaker 2 (33:25):
To New York.

Speaker 3 (33:26):
Again, like I said, maybe this is what he was
Trump was thinking of when he's said getting all of
our drugs from Canada. Now that's just your friends and
your family, Trump, that are getting the drugs from Canada.
He secured a plea deal in the case, and then
he landed behind bars and for ten years even with
the plea deal, until his pardon by Trump. The convicted

(33:49):
drug dealer who took a picture with Trump at one
of his Florida golf courses in twenty twenty two, then
was arrested in August of twenty twenty four for uggedly
slugging his wife and his seventy five year old father
in law.

Speaker 8 (34:07):
I mean, this guy attacks Toddler's seventy five.

Speaker 5 (34:10):
Year old man.

Speaker 3 (34:11):
Yeah, yeah, sounds very much like it's right on par
for the Kushner guys. You know, if you look back
at what Jerry Kushner's dad was convicted of doing, right,
he was bribing officials, and then his sister and brother
in law. We're going to expose that. And he basically

(34:37):
set his brother in law up with the honeypot. I
believe I'm just going buy memory. I didn't look that up,
but yeah, it was discussed in order to blackmail them,
just like just like Jeffrey Epstein. He set up these
sexual honeypots so she can blackmail somebody anyway. Then, the
month after the lasting his nanny, he allegedly punched de

(35:00):
Man during an argument at a Shabbat dinner at his
Long Island home, before shoving the victim's three year old
son to the ground, causing a red mark on his
back and substantial pain. The convicted marijuana distributor, who has
family ties to Trump, Here we go. Charles Kushner also
attacked a congregant praying at a synagogue and assaulted a

(35:23):
hospital nurse and separate incidents in recent months. They tried
to attack her with an iv.

Speaker 2 (35:32):
Pole.

Speaker 3 (35:34):
Was he on the ivy pole or was it somebody
else's ivy pole? But he took away from him.

Speaker 2 (35:38):
Do you know who I am? He said?

Speaker 3 (35:40):
But is he beat this guy? And the seneguy? You
know who I am? Do you know who I am?
Do you know what I could have done to you?

Speaker 2 (35:47):
Yeah? Just be grateful about all he did was beat you. Right.

Speaker 3 (35:51):
Bron was freaking out all over the place, said the
guy who has beaten Edward Miller, adding that the confrontation
had started after he asked him to be quiet. Bron
also headed shady finance firms that charged sky high interest
series where he's even more like the Kushners. On small
business loans, sometimes he has one thousand percent. You know,

(36:14):
we just completely eviscerated all the loan shark laws right
when they got rid of the usury laws with I
guess it was under Carter as inflation was taking off.
You know, it had been a ceiling of ten percent.
You couldn't charge anybody more than ten percent. Now, look
at what happens all the time with credit cards, and
then you have people who are literal loan sharks. Still

(36:36):
now they have to go up to one thousand percent,
and I guess there's no law against that. He often, however,
bullied or threatened customers with physical violence in order to
collect on the debts, said authorities. So they're not going
after him for thousand percent loans small businesses, but for
the threats of assault and battery. Secutors had sought a

(37:01):
five year sentence over Bron's recent brazen and violent conduct,
which they said caused fear and terror in his victims
and proved that he was a serious danger to the community.
And by the way, before we leave this interest thing,
you know again, it used to be criminal to charge
people confiscatory insurt rates. It should be again. I think

(37:23):
it's absolutely an outrage when you look at the credit
card rates that are out there. I mean, I'm not
Dave Ramsey, but you know that part of it I
think is absolutely criminal. But it's the banks, so we
let him do whatever they want.

Speaker 6 (37:39):
I saw a funny headline from The Babylonde the other day.
I just said, David Ramsey in critical condition after learning
a fifty year mortgage plan.

Speaker 2 (37:47):
Yeah, that was funny.

Speaker 3 (37:48):
Yeah, you're going to go into deser for how long?

Speaker 6 (37:53):
Yeah, i'st have to say. Just feels like we used
to have even a better class of criminals surrounding the
White House. They were scumbags and they were selling out America,
but they weren't just this low level thug, you know,
type of person that just beats people in public.

Speaker 3 (38:09):
Yeah, or if they were, they tried to keep it quiet,
you know how they do it, and they do.

Speaker 2 (38:14):
It at public.

Speaker 6 (38:15):
Guy just out there screaming, beating people with ivy poles.
Seems like everywhere he goes, at all times. He's just
this violent thug character. Yeah, he's more you know, scarface
than Italian mafia.

Speaker 2 (38:27):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (38:28):
Well, his defense lawyer said these violent meltdowns were caused
by his use of hallucinogenic drugs. Is that supposed to
excuse them?

Speaker 8 (38:38):
You know those again having reaper madness?

Speaker 3 (38:42):
Yeah, this is this is something that's always been a
real big issue to me. You know, when we talk
about somebody murdering somebody, you know, they use the insanity plea.
It's like, well, yeah, I mean it seems like anybody
could use that excuse because the sane person doesn't do that,
so you are by definition insane. And the guy who
killed my aunt and uncle said while I was on

(39:05):
drugs at the time. It's like, well, you're sober when
you took the drugs. I mean, that may be the reason,
but it is not an excuse. And it's not an
excuse for this guy either, And It's not just people
like you know, Rudy and Sidney Powell who don't even
have any federal charges that Trump is pardoning, or this
guy who was a hardcore criminal, white collar and otherwise

(39:26):
that Trump pardoned, takes pictures with him at its golf course,
and then he continues down this life of crime. But
I guess really the bigger issue is what happened on
Tuesday where he brings the where he basically pardons this
al Qaeda isis al Noustra terrorist that the Pentagon has

(39:47):
put in charge of Syria and is continuing to mass
murder Allo whites and Christians through Syria. That Asad never
did that. But this guy is an Al Kaeda terrorist
true to form, still doing the same kind of stuff.
I mean, that's even bigger than this particular drug dealer

(40:08):
that is there.

Speaker 2 (40:09):
Now. I saw this. One of the things that bothered
me about this.

Speaker 3 (40:12):
I saw some person put out said I just can't
understand how we would allow this guy close enough to
pat the US President on the back, and they show
a picture of him in his terrorist garb. It's like, well,
first of all, you need to understand he wasn't patting
Trump on the back. Trump is patting him on the

(40:34):
back and essentially giving him a pardon for all this stuff.
And when we talked about Trump virtue signaling about the
Christians that are being mass murdered in Nigeria, we say
the time that is nothing other than virtue signaling to
the Christian community. He's not going to do anything about it.
He doesn't have the authority to do anything about it.

(40:54):
And I really don't think he's going to do anything
about it. He didn't do anything at all to help
the Armenians were being slaughtered by the Azerbaijan people. He
claims that he stopped that, and the Azerbaijan guy was
laughing about it, caught on a hot mic in the
UN laughing about Trump's claims of brokering a peace deal there.

Speaker 2 (41:14):
He didn't do anything of the sort.

Speaker 3 (41:16):
And of course Trump doesn't do anything in Syria either
as this is happening. Instead, what he does is he
invites the guy into the hondouse. So maybe he'll do
that with an Nigerian leader. You know, they can all
come in and have a few laughs. And how stupid
everybody does Is it amazing that Trump did this with
this al Qada guy? And this Marx, the Muslim terrorist.

(41:38):
He did it on Veterans Day. And when you look
at all of the you know, the the outrage over
mom Danny being elected in New York again, that is
simply because of his position of being anti Israeli government.
It has nothing to do with him being a Muslim
or a Marxist or a socialist or whatever. Because because

(42:00):
these are the kind of guys that are true government,
the intelligence agencies and the Pentagon, that's the real government.
This is the kind of guy that they love, the
kind of guy that they use for their geopolitics. It
doesn't matter to them that these people are murdering terrorists.
It doesn't matter to them who they kill, as long
as they can use them against the Russians, because that's

(42:23):
the geopolitical game. We got to check the Russians. We've
got to make sure the Russians don't get a pipeline
across Syria. We want our allies to have the pipeline.
We've got to make sure they don't have a pipeline
into Germany for natural gas. So we'll blow that one up.
You know, it's all about those types of games. They
don't care about terrorism. They indulge in terrorism. They do assassinations.

(42:48):
Trump is proud of his assassination of the military leader
in Iran in his first regime, and they're proud of
dropping bombs on other countries. And it was this guy
was put in power by the US government. I talked
about that when it happened in December. Remember we showed
the clips of a ten warthogs. They were doing air support,

(43:11):
close end air support for this guy and these Muslim
terrorists to take over Syria. Why because we had to
get Asad out because he was allied with Russia. And
that's the game that matters to them. Who controls the oil,
who controls the gas, who is keeping Russia in check?
Those are the things that matter to them. They don't
care about our lives. They don't care about the lives

(43:34):
of Christians and other countries or anybody else for that matter.
Persistent violence is fueling fear among post Assad Syrians. The
Islamist Hayat Tahir Alsham just called HTS are now in
power in Syria, put there by the American government. They
installed them for the longest time. And this is one

(43:58):
of the things that I had COMPI minuted General Flynn
on he said what everybody knew and had been reported.
He says, yes, we are supplying ISIS, and we're giving
them weapons and we're using them. And again this is
you know, we put these people in charge and gave
them weapons. HTS present the idea of a united Syria,

(44:24):
but in practice they and their allies continue to persecute
minority groups with impunity. The Allo White massacres, the Christian massacres.
Nothing matters as long as they've got an ally to
halt Russian influence. It's all about the geopolitics. We need
to call these people not neocons. We need to call

(44:46):
them geocons. They don't care about anything except their geopolitical games.
While the HTS tries to cozy up to the Western world,
serious Christian community is not immune from attacks. In June,
a large scale bombing against Saint Elias Church and Dwila, Damascus,

(45:07):
killed at least twenty seven and now threatening signs of
being left on yet more Damascus churches. One of the
messages left on Saint Elias Church, just a bit northeast
of Damascus, ominously warned after Saint Elias, it's Saint Elias
Mahred's turn. Another message was left on the Saint Cyrilos

(45:30):
church and Damascus itself, written on the walls declaring, our
meeting is near you pigs of the Cross. So again,
this is Trump's phony virtue signaling about Nigeria. When he
brings this guy into the White House on Veterans Day,
how many veterans died thinking that they were fighting these

(45:52):
people who are actually the allies of the CIA. You know,
this is way beyond tim Osman. Actually, Alawhite and Christian
groups were pressing Trump to hold the leader of al Shara.
He's not the leader of Ars his name accountable for
protecting Syria's minorities. Shara suggested that Trump didn't bring up

(46:17):
his past as a key Al Qaeda figure during his meeting,
nor does he appear to have pressed Shara on much
of anything, with all indications that the meeting was a
friendly one focused on lifting the sanctions that had been
put against Syria while Asad was running the country. And

(46:39):
so again he says he didn't. Trump didn't bring up
any of his Al Qaeda past, he said. When asked
about it, he says, well, I think this is now
a matter of the past. We did not discuss this actively.

Speaker 2 (46:52):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (46:52):
Trump didn't ask him any questions about al Qaeda, didn't
ask him any questions about nine to one one. Why well,
because Trump knows, just like Rudy Giuliani knows, that nine
to eleven was an inside job, that al Qaeda was
being run. Uh and and Tim Osman also known as
Osama bin Laden being run by the CIA. They were

(47:12):
their surrogates, their puppets. It's always been a bunch of nonsense.
Trump did ask how many wives the guy had, and
he did, uh, then spray him work perfumed, because you know,
when you get that close to one of these stinking terrorists,
you got to do something.

Speaker 4 (47:31):
This is men's older cad.

Speaker 9 (47:36):
Yeah, it's the best fragrant.

Speaker 2 (47:44):
I have no winer, sir, Let's pray these terrorists there
so we can tolerate it.

Speaker 1 (47:49):
It was just take past, Joe put it in.

Speaker 2 (47:51):
And then the other one is you went, guys.

Speaker 3 (47:57):
I never know say the assault. We're all buddies, we're
all pals, right. I wonder if Trump washed his hands
of the blood, you think he did that. Maybe he
can make this guy a perfume distributor for Trump Perfume

(48:20):
in Syria.

Speaker 2 (48:20):
What do you think.

Speaker 6 (48:23):
Isis is probably an untapped market for perfume sales.

Speaker 2 (48:26):
That's right now. These guys probably don't care about perfume.

Speaker 6 (48:31):
It's important to realize, you know, we know that the
Iraqi War and the war in Afghanistan, it was a
croc There was no reason to be there.

Speaker 2 (48:38):
It was once again in America.

Speaker 6 (48:39):
Is bullying insane foreign policy. But the narrative has been,
you know, for years, the military was there for good reasons,
they're heroes, And this spits in the face of the
official narrative. He doesn't even care to maintain the continuity
of what they've been saying. You know, we can look
at this and agree that the military shouldn't have been there,

(49:02):
but the American people, the average person looks at this
and they think, you know, the military was there promoting freedom,
They were bringing democracy, and these guys are the enemy.
They were in the antithesis of everything we were trying
to achieve there for you know, the greater good.

Speaker 3 (49:18):
Yeah, they killed American soldiers. You know, they're being sent
there for no good reason. We were lied into that
war by lies from the person that Trump made the
head of the CIA when he got in there, Gina Haskell,
So she lied us into a war with lies about
weapons and mass destruction that didn't exist. Then we go
to fight people that he's now giving perfume to in
the Oval Office. What a croc this whole thing is.

(49:41):
And he does it on Veterans Day where he supposed
to be honoring the people who were killed to fight
for quote unquote freedom. You are not fighting for freedom.
If you fight for the American government, you are deceived.
I tell you, this is just disgusting to see this.
When asked if he regrets that al Qaeda carried out

(50:02):
the attacks in the World Trade Center of the Pentagon
on September eleventh, two thousand and one, Shara said he
wasn't involved.

Speaker 2 (50:08):
With the group at the time. Which group? Would that be?
The CIA? It was very.

Speaker 3 (50:13):
Diplomatic answer, isn't it? He doesn't say we didn't do it.
He says, I wasn't with the group. Which group? He
first joined al Qaeda after the US invasion of Iraq
in two thousand and three to fight US troops. So
what point did he join the CIA? That's what I'd
like to know. Right He was imprisoned by the US

(50:34):
military from two thousand and six to twenty eleven, I
guess that was when it happened. After that, he traveled
to Syria, where he founded the al Qaeda affiliate in
the country known as the Al Nusra, a front which
we reported many times. They were seen being given weapons,
you know, drops and everything by the US government. At

(50:55):
the time, he was allied with Macar al Baghdadi, founder
of ISIS. Then he rebranded himself in twenty sixteen. You know,
it's all, everything is fine as long as they change
the name, right. You go from the muja Hadeen, which
there again they were using to fight Russia, and that
was you know, the that was McCain going round to

(51:19):
Republican women's groups. You wanted to adopt a muge and
he would have these guys with them, and then they
go from that to al Qaeda, then to ISIS, then
to al Nusra, and now this latest HTS. He cut
ties with al Qaeda, merged his Chihatis group with other
factions to form HTS, which was then put in power
in Damascus with American aid and air support. So Syria

(51:45):
has joined the US led anti ISIS coalition.

Speaker 2 (51:49):
What a joke, What a joke.

Speaker 3 (51:53):
That the US is planning to establish now a military
base in Damascus. So again, these are the geocans with
their geopolitics. We're going to stop this pipeline going across
Syria for the Russians. We'll put one going across Syria
for our Arab allies, and then we'll get a military
base that we'll put there. That's all they care about.

(52:16):
This is just the raw exercise of power. These people
have no principles, They have no concern about innocent life,
whether it's Americans or Christians or whoever it is. The
Pentagon always uses these Muslim terrorists as allies to fight
their rival Russia.

Speaker 2 (52:35):
I guess we have to ask Travisa, are we the baddies?

Speaker 3 (52:39):
And I thought we are Hans, We the baddies, I think.
So let's go over the comments. You have the comments here.
I am pulling them up as we speak. I see
one here as Tony ardeband on today. No Tony is
traveling today, He's not going to be on today. But
we do have news about gold and bitcoin and stable
coin with us on that.

Speaker 6 (53:02):
President Avante seventeen seventy six says, here is a point
what terrorist in the Oval office has killed more people
the al Qaeda guy from Syria or connalled j. Trump.

Speaker 3 (53:13):
Yeah, well I think that would be Trump actually just
those vaccines. But I think also with the wars, the
direct wars, you can say certainly they are acting as
terrorists in Venezuela. I mean, for example, okay, they just
had the military capture a drug boat. This is the

(53:33):
way it's typically done, right, this is what law enforcement
looks like. You intercept a boat, you grab the people,
you arrest them. We found drugs. So now as part
of our war on drugs, which they don't have any
constitutional authority. Four, they will now do a law enforcement action.
But you know, we just shoot from a distance with
a missile. You know, why are we still doing this?

(53:55):
I mean, why don't we just blow people out of
the water. Well, because that's a crime. That's a crime
in America, it's a crime internationally. What Trump and these
other people do. You want to talk about terrorists? They are
the terrorists. And that's not even talking about the terrorism
that he imposed on people with the genetic code injection

(54:16):
that he is so proud of that he says that
he's the father of go ahead Trump.

Speaker 6 (54:21):
Yeah, who got Steve Ebb says, I thought there were
no documents to dump.

Speaker 3 (54:26):
That's right, it was all a hoax, right, had nothing
to see here. Well, Trump is telling them no more,
no more, don't let anything else out there. We're gonna
something's gonna come out. That's gonna show people what I'm doing.

Speaker 8 (54:37):
That must be a very cluttered desk that he has,
if she can miss all of these documents on it.

Speaker 2 (54:43):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (54:43):
I saw somebody put up a funny meme showing what
her desk must look like. And it was tough all
over the place, lit it all over the place.

Speaker 6 (54:53):
It was just completely covered. It's impossible to find anything.

Speaker 2 (54:56):
That's right. We've got Nathan.

Speaker 6 (54:58):
Bedford Forest eighteen sixty Vibes says he asked his lane
to stop poaching girls from our lago, not to stop
abusing underage girls. Trump did not want Epstein stealing his girls.

Speaker 2 (55:09):
That's right.

Speaker 6 (55:09):
He doesn't care about the abuse. Just hey, these are mine,
These are my girls to abuse. Go get your own
underage girls.

Speaker 2 (55:17):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (55:17):
I found r Jenda Guthrie to work in my spa here,
and I don't want you're taking her away to work
on Prince Andrew.

Speaker 6 (55:25):
Yeah, we have buzzy Matteo says, the emails don't prove
Trump did anything inappropriate with underage girls. They only suggest. However,
they do prove that Epstein Israel had and has leverage
on him. That is a huge problem.

Speaker 3 (55:38):
Yeah, that's right, that's the you know the again, what's
there and the front that everybody sees is the crime
about the sexual stuff and anything. But the bigger issue
in the pack is the fact that this is a
big sex blackmail ring. And of course that's exactly what
the CIA does. You know, CIA does it, Masad does it.

Speaker 2 (55:55):
They all do that.

Speaker 3 (55:57):
There was a trove of documents released, not too much
and go about CIA doing that in San Francisco, but
we know they do that. That's long established principle of everybody.
I mean, the Chinese are doing it. They did it
with Eric Swallowell and yet he didn't get kicked out
of Congress's truly amazing. They had a honeypot there with
an Asian girl.

Speaker 2 (56:18):
Go ahead, Buzzy Miteo continues.

Speaker 6 (56:21):
If the press runs with this, a full out invasion
of Venezuela will happen within weeks, or an event quote
unquote will happen in the Middle East or the us.
This keeps coming on out, then something is going to
happen somewhere. Hey, look over there. Don't pay attention to this, Shelley.
As if the court records are still there from New York.
Trumpet paid the families of a few kids a couple

(56:42):
million in a lawsuit. Yeah, they're always covering something up.

Speaker 2 (56:47):
That's right. That's right. Well, we're going to take a
quick break, folks, and we'll be right.

Speaker 1 (56:51):
Back making sense common again.

Speaker 2 (58:28):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 10 (58:38):
Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelenski. I'm so tired of wearing
these same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
And I could if only David Knight would send me
one of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new
black T shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue. But

(59:02):
he told me to get lost. Maybe one of you
American suckers can buy me some at the David Knightshow
dot com. You should be able to buy me several hundred.
Those amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful. I'd
wear something other than green military cosplay to my various.

Speaker 6 (59:20):
Gallas and social events.

Speaker 10 (59:21):
If you want to save on shipping, just put it
in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from
the USA.

Speaker 3 (59:39):
Well, welcome back, and speaking of our pal there, Vladimir Zelenski, Voladimir,
I guess it sees Voladimir and Putin? Is Vladimir so
different emphosis on different salabos. But anyway, the Western media
is now beginning damage control after a one hundred million

(01:00:01):
dollar corruption scandal is rocking Ukraine, and folks, this is
just the tip of the iceberg. Everybody has talked about
how corrupt Ukraine is and has been. I mean, even
Bill Gates has said the most corrupt country on Earth.
And he would know because he goes around bribing governments everywhere,
so he would know that he could get what he

(01:00:22):
wants out of Ukraine. And so it's absolutely unacceptable that
amid all of this, there are also some schemes in
the energy sector, said Zelenski. Oh yeah, you know, remember
that that was what Hunter Biden was involved in. He
was somehow an energy expert, or maybe his expertise lay elsewhere.

(01:00:45):
Maybe it was his crime family connections, you know, just
like Trump's got his own crime family, and he's connected
to the Kushner crime family as well well. Same thing
with the Bidens as well. But Western media have immediately
launched into damage control. One op ed in Bloomberg trying
its best to say that this is not at all
the fault of Ukraine, but somehow the Russians are behind it.

(01:01:09):
There are at least two legitimate responses, they said, the
allegations that a group of highly placed Ukrainian officials have
skimmed only one hundred million dollars, I mean, small chump
change considering the amount of money that we know these
people are skimming off. I mean, just remember at the
very beginning of.

Speaker 2 (01:01:26):
This how there was this whole.

Speaker 3 (01:01:30):
List of properties that were put in shell corporations that
had connections to Zelenski's wife. I mean it was like
all these different villas and everything all all over the world.
It was like a bunch of Madrevsky dolls, you know,
one shell corporation inside of another shell corporation, all them

(01:01:51):
tracing back to his wife, who is going shopping in
Paris and spending fifty thousand dollars an hour on clothes.
The corruption is massive there and so they're trying to
cover all of this stuff up, but we know exactly
what is happening with all of it. And as a
matter of fact, when you look at what is going on,

(01:02:13):
we've got American troops now practicing in the jungles of
Panama getting ready to attack the Venezuelan people. Another Vinnie
Nam is what I think, and I'd be called one,
two three? What are we fighting for? Don't ask me,
I don't give a nam. Next stop is Vinnie Nam.
The US Army is preparing also to purchase a million

(01:02:37):
drones to secure domain dominance on the modern battlefield, because
now drones have emerged as really the asymmetric warfare of
the air. You know, when we look at the fact
that we can go into a country, as we have
time and again, we can from the air destroy their

(01:02:58):
infrastructure in the military, except then you decide that you're
going to go in and occupy the place with boots
on the ground, and that's when the asymmetric warfare starts
with the improvised explosive devices and other things like that. Well,
the drones have been the neutralizing force behind these expensive
tank systems. It doesn't matter if it's a state of

(01:03:20):
the art Russian tank, if it's a state of the
art German or American tank, they're all very vulnerable to
these drones. So nearly four months after WARPETE announced sweeping
reforms aimed at achieving drone domain dominance by twenty twenty seven,
so we don't have it yet, including a Pentagon wide

(01:03:41):
procurement overhaul led by DOGE, the US Army is preparing
to acquire at least a million drones of the next
few years, so it's not all at once. This is
going to be over two to three years, meaning that
they're planning on purchasing about three hundred thirty three thousand
to five hundred thousand, depending on the amount of time

(01:04:01):
that takes annually. Right now they are purchasing fifty thousand
drone so that is a huge jump. They're going up
by six to ten times while they're currently purchasing. And
if you think that's a lot, and it is, you
need to understand that at the same time, Ukraine is

(01:04:22):
producing four million a year, not three hundred and thirty
three thousand, not a half a million a year, but
four million a year, and so is Russia, and China
is producing eight million a year, So our goal is
to get up from fifty thousand to maybe five hundred thousand.

(01:04:43):
We are really lagging behind, you know. This is yet
another sign of a decaying empire, not only the belligerence
that we see there, the arrogance that continues to exceed,
but totally bankrupt and behind, you know. So it's like
a massive tree that has died and has hollowed out

(01:05:05):
on the inside, just waiting for a wind or a
lightning strike to take it down. And we are inviting
the whirlwind by our foreign policies. So US is taking
lessons from Russia's war in Ukraine, which has been characterized
by drone deployments on an unprecedented scale. The inexpensive drones

(01:05:25):
have proven to be the most potent weapon in the
Russian Ukrainian war. Conventional warplanes are rarely used because the
dense concentration of anti aircraft systems near the front lines.
Ukraine and Russia each produced roughly four million a year again,
but China double that number. So we are you know, meanwhile,

(01:05:49):
we are provoking wars everywhere left and right, and as
I talked about with the boat capture, blowing people out
of the water that we have not bothered to find
out if they even have drugs on the boat let alone.
We don't know their name, we don't know if they
have any drugs on and certainly we do know that

(01:06:10):
these boats are not capable of making the journey to
the US. So it is illegal and a lie in
every regard. So again, drones of the future of warfare,
and America will come from behind to lead the way. Well,
we are way, way, way behind. China's making eight million
a year, We're making fifty thousand a year.

Speaker 8 (01:06:34):
We will lead the way with one sixteenth of the production.

Speaker 1 (01:06:37):
Of our.

Speaker 2 (01:06:40):
Yeah, that's right.

Speaker 3 (01:06:41):
So Russia is saying that they will break the nuclear
test man only if the US does so first. And
they appropriately said that what Trump is saying about the
fact that they were doing weapons tests of delivery vehicles,
they were not exploding bombs.

Speaker 2 (01:07:00):
They said to.

Speaker 3 (01:07:02):
Draw a shallow and inaccurate conclusion by conflating nuclear power
system trials with nuclear tests of bombs, And that is
exactly what Trump has been doing. This was a story
that I wanted to cover, but we were not here
on Tuesday. And this was a war veteran of World

(01:07:25):
War II one hundred years old now. His name is
Alec Pinstone, and he said when he was put on
a news program in Great Britain's Good Morning to Britain show,
he was their guest, and he said, and to their surprise,
that the sacrifice that was necessary to win World War

(01:07:46):
two was not worth it, not worth the result that
we have now. It was both a commentary on war
and a commentary on the war being conducted against the
British people by their own government, as every government is
doing right now. He was a Royal Navy veteran who
was involved in D Day landings. He said he paid

(01:08:09):
his dues and spades. His comments certainly surprised the hosts,
but it did not surprise the millions of Internet viewers
who sympathized with his lament. He and his comrades, they said,
fought for freedom. Yet today he said, things are a
darn sight worse. He said, I can see in my
mind's eye rose and rows of white stones of all

(01:08:31):
the hundreds of my friends and everybody else. They gave
their lives and for what he said, the country of today. No,
I'm sorry, the sacrifice wasn't worth the result that.

Speaker 2 (01:08:42):
It is now. What do you mean by that, said
one of the hosts.

Speaker 3 (01:08:46):
Well, what we fought for was our freedom, and we
fought for it. Even now it's a darn sight worse
than when I fought for it. He was fifteen years
old and working in a factory when the war broke
out in nineteen thirty nine. He was drafted in the
SON on board a submarine in nineteen forty three, before
moving to a ship which was a minesweeper searching for

(01:09:10):
U boats during the D Day landing on June sixth,
nineteen forty four. So he wasn't specific about what freedoms
he was alluding to. Well, I guess we have to
ask what freedoms are left.

Speaker 2 (01:09:23):
In the UK. Right.

Speaker 3 (01:09:25):
They don't have equal protection of the law. They punish
people for speech, and they have released over and over
again a massive number of criminals. It's now up to
several hundred that they've gone back and said, you know,
we keep accidentally releasing these criminals, violent criminals who come
in to the country illegally, they commit crimes, they put

(01:09:47):
them in prison and they release them again. The Telegraph
said surveys of public opinion confirmed that the UK nationals
feel that their country has gotten worse in the last
five years and we're not getting any better in the
next five years. Yeah, we've got to make the world
safe for democracy. Well, you have to have a just society,

(01:10:09):
and when you're talking about a just society, you better
make sure that begins by not having unjust wars. Because
war is the lifeblood of the state, but it is
the death of the rest of us. The money and
the lives that it takes is destroys the society. And

(01:10:30):
when it's done on an unjust basis, you don't even
have to wait for the sowing and reaping principle. God
will take care of that. So an unjust society doesn't
have any foundation. An unjust society is not worth fighting for.

Speaker 2 (01:10:48):
As somebody said.

Speaker 3 (01:10:50):
You know, once you once you real a revolution and
a war is when you fight who they tell you
to fight. A revolution is when you figure out who
the enemy is. And we have to understand that right now.
This is truly first and foremost. If you want to
have a lasting foundation for your society, you're going to

(01:11:11):
have to fight a spiritual war. And so there was
a meme that was put up by a lot of people.
You can see that in the article that there, Lancey, scroll
down and it's a World War II soldier who is
screaming at one of these cops. That is again, they
don't dress like bobbies anymore. These guys are wearing caps
like American police officers. And the soldier says, I sacrifice

(01:11:35):
my life to secure this country's freedom and freedom of speech.
Now you arrest people for words while turning a blind
eye to crimes committed by invaders. Yeah, just as we
had on our Veterans Day, we had us in the US,
we have Trump meeting with an al Qaeda leader from

(01:11:56):
Syria on Veterans Day in the Oval Office. And again,
why are we getting involved in these geopolitical wars? And
who is it that is controlling us? Well, you know,
decades ago, BB, Netanyahu was talking about how they own
the United States.

Speaker 2 (01:12:14):
How many times do I have.

Speaker 3 (01:12:15):
To tell us that Trump has told us that he's
talked about how Maria Maddilson loves Israel more than the US,
and how Congress used to be owned by Israeli but
now only he is. And so you better send your
money to me, you know, Israel. Send your money to
me care of the White.

Speaker 9 (01:12:35):
House, never going to be a country like what we
have right now, and does that the Republicans have to
talk about it?

Speaker 11 (01:12:40):
And does that mean the h one B vis a
thing will not.

Speaker 3 (01:12:43):
Be that's the wrong clip hanging in a second, that's
in the wrong button here. It's mislabeled. So we're not
going to play the BB clip, I guess because it's
not in there BB decades ago, how bragging about how
Israel owns the US? That clip is not in there.

(01:13:03):
So it's just a reminder, folks. Then when we're talking
about Israel, what we're talking about is a government. We're
not talking about an ethnic group of people. We're not
talking about anything that's biblical. The state of Israel is
about as unbiblical as you can find anything here. So
you know, you also got people who understand that who

(01:13:25):
are Jewish.

Speaker 12 (01:13:26):
Hey, new Yorker, I just voted Mandani, and I spoke
for the Israeli TV now that we're in shock that
so many Jewish people support Mandani, and there were even
more shocked that we all know that they commit genocide
against the Palestinian people. So hey, New Yorkers, vote for Mamdani.
Don't be afraid. We can change the world. If we

(01:13:49):
all be do the right thing. Bye bye.

Speaker 2 (01:13:54):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:13:54):
And that's why, you know, when you look at all
of the angst about Mom Danny with people like Mark
Levan In Shapiro and Trump, is simply because he's opposed
to the state of Israel. We don't actually have a
problem with Muslim terrorists, right, we invite them into the
Oval office.

Speaker 13 (01:14:12):
My name is Abbi David Feldman and Whitney Turi Karta International.

Speaker 2 (01:14:15):
We are standing here on the.

Speaker 13 (01:14:16):
Steps of New York City City Hall, and we are
here while we are unfortunately seeing this terrible intimidation against
a candidate for mayor here in the city, mister mam Dani.
And this is disturbing to so many Jewish people. This
harassments and these intimidations is about his brave stance to
speaking up to what he believes is right. And he

(01:14:38):
is speaking up against the crimes being committed to the
Palestinian people. Now they are condemning him as anti Semitic
cause he is against the state of Israel. This is misleading,
this is unjust, and this is dangerous. We need politicians
to be on the right side of history and to
speak up for the press. We as New Yorkers. We
as citizens of the United States, we should a denire

(01:15:01):
brave politicians, and we should give them the freedom to
express what they believe is right. And we encourage people
voters to vote what is in the interests of our
city and not in the interest of a foreign country,
the State of Israel, and certainly not in the interest
of crimes being committed to our decide of the world.
We as Jewish people, say that conflating anti Zionism with antisemitism,

(01:15:26):
conflating Judaism with Zionism, is not only doing in justice
to the Palestinian people, this is dangerous for the Jewish
people as well, because what this is doing is this
is generalizing all Jews, saying that God forbid all Jews
or in support of all these crimes, which ends up
making a statement that all Jews are accountable to what
is taking place. This is antisemitism and this generalization is racism.

(01:15:50):
This is not done by some.

Speaker 2 (01:15:51):
People out here.

Speaker 13 (01:15:52):
This is done by this movement of Zionism who claims
to represent all Jews. In no way does the State
of Israel or it's actually represent world Judy, and certainly
doesn't represent the Jewish religions all that Israel stands what
is a total violation not only of international of the
violation of Judaism. This has to be stopped. We urged

(01:16:13):
right minded people to be brave and to raise their voice.

Speaker 3 (01:16:22):
We need to all come to the realization. You know,
if you are a Jewish, the government of Israel doesn't
support you. They support their own interests, they got their
own agenda. If you're American, the American government doesn't support you.
They've got their own interests and they have contempt for
your life. Just like in the UK, the government there
does not support the traditions or the rule of law

(01:16:44):
or the British people. As one person put up one
World War Two, we lost Britain. You're not being tolerant,
you're not being inclusive, you're not being open minded. You're
being conquered. And this is true in every government that
we see. And it doesn't matter whether it's US, Israel,
or you are UK. The people who are running these

(01:17:07):
governments are against their own people. That's the reality of this. Well,
we're going to take a quick break, Travis. You want
to read the comments, okay, we'll read them then, Angiosnita,
your okay?

Speaker 6 (01:17:26):
You're there, Okay, yeah, I'm here. The last one that
we missed was Shelley A saying they are all fetophiles,
which yes, basically basically everyone in the government is indeed, yeah,
a feedophile. And I'm waiting on the next batch to
come in.

Speaker 3 (01:17:43):
Have a federal government and it's run by FEDO files.
This is Angios Sanita. So as my husband as a
veteran and did five tours, four in Iraq and one
in Afghanistan during the g w T and o i.

Speaker 6 (01:17:58):
F Global War Ontar creation, Iraqi freedom.

Speaker 2 (01:18:01):
Okay, thank you.

Speaker 3 (01:18:02):
To see Trump do this is absolutely disgusting and insulting.
It is a slap in the face to all the
people who went I mean, they were lied to about
weapons of mass destruction, and now all of the things
that we're called conspiracy theorists for have now been shown
to be true.

Speaker 2 (01:18:19):
I mean, we've seen.

Speaker 3 (01:18:21):
The air support to put these al Qaeda people in
charge of Syria, and again it's all just their geopolitical games,
these geocons. Jason Barker, good to see you, Jason says Trump.
Perfume the smell of grift. Yeah, that's it exactly, isn't it?
Absolutely true. We're gonna take a quick break and we'll

(01:18:41):
be right back.

Speaker 5 (01:18:42):
Folks in.

Speaker 2 (01:20:19):
You're listening to the David Knight Show. If you like
the Eagles on.

Speaker 6 (01:20:27):
The Cars and Huey Lewis and the news, they say.

Speaker 7 (01:20:33):
You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio, download
our app or listen now at apsradio dot com.

Speaker 3 (01:20:42):
Well, the shutdown is allegedly and apparently over, and then
it's time for recriminations. As I pointed out yesterday, Trump
attacking the air traffic controllers who didn't show up when
they were not getting paid and saying that the ones
who did he's going to give a ten thousand.

Speaker 2 (01:21:00):
Dollar bonus to. And of course Laura Ingram asked him, well,
are you going to get that money? It doesn't matter.

Speaker 3 (01:21:05):
I'll get it somewhere, right, And so Booty Gay got
on and had something to say about it as well.
So you know what Trump had said was anyone who
did not get back to work right away will be docked.
And so he said for all the air traffic controllers

(01:21:27):
who were great patriots and didn't take any time off
for the Democrats shut down hoax, I will be recommending
a bonus of ten thousand dollars per person for distinguished
service to our country. For those that did nothing but
complain and took time off even though everyone knew that
they would be paid in full shortly in the future. Well,

(01:21:47):
evidently that's not going to happen to some of them.
I am not happy with you. This is only meant
to hurt our country. And it was a Democrat attack,
he said. It'll be a negative mark at least in
my mind. Again your record, Well, Booty Gay said the
president wouldn't last five minutes as an air traffic controller,
and of course that is true. I think it's a

(01:22:09):
very stressful job. And one of the reasons I think
they're having a difficult time finding people to take the
position because they keep doing this type of thing. That
there's no reason at all for the air traffic controllers
to be under the thumb of the federal government and
to be there to be independent. But what we see

(01:22:31):
happening here is that the federal government, once he gets
control of anything, is very reluctant to give it up,
even if it makes sense anyway, he said the president
wouldn't last five minutes as an air traffic controller. And
after everything they've been through and the way this administration
has been treating them from day one, he has no
business crapping on them now. Well, Trump likes to do that.

(01:22:54):
He pushed out a meme of him doing that in
the country. Why is Trump going after America's air traffic
controllers today of all days, because, as usual, he is
a sore winner. It's one way to distract from his
decision about health insurance premium, said Booty Gay. He said,
other than than mostly pronouncing my name right, everything he

(01:23:17):
said is wrong, said Booty Gay. I'm the one who
pronounces his name right. So anyway, Sean Duffy said, give
me a break. You are basically a wall at the dot. Well,
that's true. I spent my whole day dealing with your
neglect and cleaning up your messes. You should set this
one out. And then a retired air traffic controller who

(01:23:39):
had thirty four years of experience really destroyed Booty Gay.
She said, you are I said. Every one of these
people is eligible through the Credit Union for no interest
short term loans repayable upon back pay when the government reopens,
or they can borrow against their TSP and repay it

(01:24:01):
to themselves when they receive back pay, except I guess
they're not going to get back paid now, right, according
to Trump, some of them. Not one single air traffic
controller can claim financial hardship because of these two well
established common practices that have been in place for every
shutdown for decades. Well, that's fine. I hadn't seen that
anywhere from anybody else. This is an air traffic controller

(01:24:23):
saying you can take out a loan from the credit
card union and pay it back when you get paid.
Can the military do that? Because military bases in Germany,
the US government was telling them to go to German
food banks.

Speaker 2 (01:24:36):
To get food.

Speaker 3 (01:24:37):
You know what, do other people have that capability? And
when you look at the air traffic controllers they've set
this up? Why because they have been hit with these
shutdowns over and over again. Why don't we so that
we don't have to shut down flights across this country?
Why don't we take them out of this situation so
they're not affected by shutdowns? Wouldn't that make more sense?

(01:24:59):
She said? You know this because I worked for the
FAA for thirty four years. The only air traffic controllers
who laid out during the shutdown were the ones intentionally
making a political statement to make things difficult for the
American flying public, she said. In another post, Scott told Boudigue,
I retired because of how you and the Biden administration,

(01:25:19):
to use your words, crapped on every employee of the
FAA and ruined a once fine agency. You allowed men
into my office bathroom. I had to work with and
for people that you hired and promoted because of the
color of their skin or who they have sex with,
who were holy and completely unqualified for the job. You

(01:25:42):
forced me to inject an experimental, dangerous drug into my
body in order to keep my job in paycheck. You, sir,
can sit down and shut up. Well, what about the
father of the vaccine? You know, just like this woman
who worked for the FAA, he has nothing to say
about the guy who created the dangerous experimental drug that

(01:26:06):
then Biden, in a tag team operation, forced on people,
you know. And what about WorldNet Daily that reported this.
They never never blame Trump for any of this. You know,
Trump creates the poison and then he hands it off
to Biden, so they both have, you know, an excuse,
their plausible deniability, and yet it's all simply for them,

(01:26:29):
It's only about the mandate. It's fine if he poisons people,
as long as he doesn't mandate it for you, is
that right? So, SNAP and the growth of the American
welfare state, this is from the epic times. And again,
neither the air traffic controllers nor the welfare state will
be fixed or improved. They stand as monuments to government

(01:26:53):
failure and centralized control. And the welfare state has just exploded.
And that's what I think is one of the interesting
things to come out of this, These two areas that
have been central to We see the failure of government.
We see also, and most of this stuff, how absolutely

(01:27:13):
irrelevant and unnecessary the federal government is to our lives,
except for the people who become dependent on the government
for food and the people who see that the entire
air travel system has been hijacked by the federal government.
SNAP has grown dramatically over the last fifty years. About

(01:27:35):
two percent of Americans got the benefits in nineteen seventy.
Today thirteen percent of Americans receive SNAP benefits, forty two
million people, seven times the percentage. This is their aspiration,
of course, is not just thirteen percent of people. They
want everybody universal basic income, which is universal based welfare,

(01:28:01):
there is a six hundred and fifty percent increase in
the number of Americans who were unable to provide adequate
food for themselves. Participation spiked by sixty nine percent between
two thousand and eight and twenty thirteen, reaching a high
of more than forty five million people monthly recipients, largely
due to the nationwide recession. Then between two thousand and

(01:28:24):
seven and two thousand and nine, national unemployment averaged nine
point three percent. Nearly fifteen percent of Americans lived in poverty.
New Mexico is the highest participant at twenty one percent
of the population, in Utah only four point eight percent.
The participation rate for many states mirrors their poverty rate.

(01:28:46):
Snap costs went up another ninety eight percent, again doubled
during the Trump lockdown of the so called COVID nineteen pandemic,
a three hundred percent increase in twenty years compared to
the overall fifty percent increase in enrollment.

Speaker 2 (01:29:04):
So the.

Speaker 3 (01:29:07):
Cost of it is exploding as well as the enrollment
into this. So again, now the Democrats, in the wake
of what happened, the Democrats are it's now their turn
to do the bad optics and to self incriminate themselves,
just like Trump did. Trump continued to say instead of

(01:29:29):
taking the high ground and saying, Okay, we have this
disagreement here, but we're going to make sure that we
meet the obligations and the equipments that we've made to people. Again,
I don't support the welfare state, but they've got people
that are on it right now and they need to
find a way to transition off of it. It's like
social Security. I don't like socil security program, but if
you've got people who have planned on that their entire life,

(01:29:49):
you've got to find a way to transition away from
that rather than just cutting people off cold turkey. And
that's what Trump has done. And that's now what the
Democrats have done, because the Democrats are now, well, you know,
the day after this thing was agreed to, the Democrats
are coming after the people who crossed over and voted

(01:30:10):
to open up the government, making it clear to everybody
that they were the ones who were keeping it closed,
just like Trump is going around with his ballroom capitalism
while people don't have jobs and kids are not eating
because of the SNAP program. Now the Democrats are saying
it was us all along. Both of these parties have

(01:30:30):
thrown Americans under the bus for their vindictive politics.

Speaker 2 (01:30:35):
It's just like war, right.

Speaker 3 (01:30:37):
They don't care about you, and they don't care about
your family. They will do whatever they want. Stephen Colbert
comes out and all these different the commisson they're not
comedians anymore. They're comment commenters about political commentary. So Democrat defectors,
he said, crumbled like a granola bar. Yeah it was.

(01:31:02):
He's admitting it was always there in transigence all the way,
all along. And at Newsom called it capitulation. And you've
got people in the Democrat party that's saying that they
want to ruthlessly punish those who voted to end the shutdown.
They were telling everybody it was one hundred percent Trump
the entire time, and you know they're both right. Again,

(01:31:25):
it is both Trump and the Democrats who were doing
this stuff and showing their contempt for Americans. So Stephen
Colbert torched the eight members the Democrat caucus who crossed
party lines to reopen the government, and they got John
Stewart saying, I can't effing believe it. The Democrat senators

(01:31:45):
caved to Republicans.

Speaker 2 (01:31:46):
Again.

Speaker 3 (01:31:47):
These guys who are the comedians who are trying to
be the pr flax for the Democrat party are all
coming out and saying the obvious. He said, do you
remember the Democrats they shut down the government month then
they caved on the shutdown, not even a full week
removed from the best election night results they've had in years.
It was all just for that, It's all just for show.

(01:32:10):
Seven Democrat senators and an independent voted with their Republican
counterparts to end the shutdown and reopen the government. And
did they get their extended health care sub to these No?
He said, He said, I can't believe it. He then
played a clip of Tim Kaine arguing, quote offering a
vote in the Senate without a commitment that would pass

(01:32:31):
without a commitment that the House would even take it
up in an empty offer. He said, that guy gets it,
Tim Kane, Tim Kaine gets it. You don't see him
as one of the eight voting members. And then somebody said, well,
actually he did.

Speaker 2 (01:32:44):
He goes, I can't believe it. So that was a joke.

Speaker 3 (01:32:48):
You know, these guys say one thing, they do another.
And then Bernie Sanders lashes out at the Democrat leadership,
saying that they are out of touch as he goes
on with Rachel Maddow again, you know, pushing to be
ruthlessly pragmatic and to kick Schumer out of his leadership position.

(01:33:09):
And they are owning it now, which again they're showing
that they were lying about this the entire time. A
Republican poll shows that California Governor Newsom is leading JD
Vance among young men from the twenty twenty eight presidential election.
The poll also suggests that Newsom has been positioning himself
as a potential contender for the twenty twenty eight nomination.

(01:33:30):
Is that news, No, it's not news. The problem is
is that Trump's bluster and bullying might very well get
us president. Newsom or somebody equally is awful like that.
He holds an early edge over JD Vance among young
male voters for the twenty twenty eight election. Thirty eight

(01:33:51):
percent of them would vote for Newsom compared to thirty
three percent for Vance.

Speaker 2 (01:33:57):
So there you go.

Speaker 3 (01:33:58):
There may be with these two people choiceod be a
communist totalitarian for Newsom or a technocrat to tolitarian for Jdvans.

Speaker 2 (01:34:10):
That's the big choice that's there.

Speaker 6 (01:34:12):
And then Trump goes on and says, well, call it
trump Care.

Speaker 3 (01:34:15):
Yeah, exactly. Yeah, isn't that great. These people who control
the ballot make sure that you don't really have a choice.
You know, whether you're talking about a Marxist or a
neo Marxist, a communist or a technocrat, they both want
to basically take us to the same place. They just
have different ways of doing it, and they have different
groups of people who are going to profit from all

(01:34:35):
of this. So Trump is out there saying that he
wants to call it trump Care because it'll be so
much better if it's got his name on it. And
if the government then manipulates your healthcare, your health care plan,
you know, And I said this many times when I

(01:34:55):
remember when Trump ran in twenty sixteen. I remember remember
even where I was when I read the plan from Trump,
and I was absolutely surprised the plan that was put
together by the Trump people and said, well, I'll you
serious about this. I hope it isn't just done with
some consultants that he got on staff from the Heritage Foundation.
So because it had all these important aspects of it.

(01:35:17):
It had transparency, it had competition between insurance plans, and
it had information so that you could compare doctors, hospitals,
other healthcare providers with each other and you could see
their record which is always hidden from us. And then
it had competition across straight state lines. It had provisions
in there to make sure that we had liquidity, that

(01:35:39):
we had the money to actually make the purchase in
terms of credits against income tax. Again, if healthcare is
so important that the federal government needs to subsidize it
and provide, can't they give us a tax cut so
that we can pay for our healthcare before we send
them our money for.

Speaker 2 (01:36:00):
Taxes when that makes sense.

Speaker 3 (01:36:03):
And so I went through this, and I remember it
was like about ten or twelve steps of things that
they wanted to do, and they were all excellent. And
I remember setting that. That's before Alex built in the
studios and so it was in his original studio that
kind of looked like, you know, two people sitting at
a desk with a curtain in the back, like Joe
Rogan does. I remember going through that whole thing, and

(01:36:25):
then right after the election it disappeared that page was
memory hold off of the Trump campaign, never to be
seen again. None of those things were ever brought up
by Trump in his first term, and they're not being
brought up now. That's not a part of the plan.

(01:36:45):
Laura Ingram said, on Obamacare, you raised several times during
the shutdown debate, it's clear that this was never going
to work without massive subsidies. Well, it's been about a
decade now since we saw the Trump plan, which is
then memory hold, about a decade since he ran on
building the wall and getting rid of Obamacare. So where

(01:37:08):
are we right now? Basically, what you're going to wind
up with is settling for relabeling. Just like he relabeled NAFTA,
the USMCA, He's going to relabel Obamacare trump Care, and
it'll be minor, minor tweaks, rearranging the deck chairs on
the Titanic, So he said, She said, now they want

(01:37:32):
to continue the COVID subsidies. So given the fact that
Obamacare really can't survive as they thought without these subsidies,
what is next? Trump said, Well, I said it's going
to be a disaster, and I was exactly right. The
premiums have gone up like rocket ships. And I'm not
just talking about recently, I'm talking about for years. They've

(01:37:52):
been going up all the way through his first administration,
they didn't do anything about he said, I went instead
of going to the insurance companies. They want the money
to go into and account for people where they buy
their own health insurance. The insurance will be better, it'll
cost less, everything's everybody's going to be happy and they're
going to feel like entrepreneurs. They're actually going to be

(01:38:13):
able to go out and negotiate their own insurance and
they can do it only for that reason. That's the beauty,
only for that purpose. So again the question is, well,
this plan that we haven't seen, will it have transparency,
will it have competition? Will it have liquidity? All he's
talking about here is a liquidity aspect of it. So again,

(01:38:37):
when you look at the blame going back and forth,
it's now showing up in the blame game over what
is happening to our power grid? And the Democrats are
blaming the AI power centers that are coming in. The
GOP is blaming the climate cult and you know they're

(01:38:57):
both right.

Speaker 2 (01:38:58):
Both of these.

Speaker 3 (01:38:58):
Things are problems, and they are problems from both of
the parties. Democrats appointing the finger at the explosion of
data center build outs, some power hungry server racks, while
conservative politicians blame disastrous green energy policies, specifically the early
retirement of fossil fuel power generation plants and the rapid
rollout of unreliable solar and wind generation. Well, they're both right,

(01:39:24):
and you know, neither one of them are going to
fix either of these problems. On his first day in office,
Trump was pushing this stargate thing and saying, yeah, all
these companies are going to build their own power plants,
and they're going to do it next to their data center,
next to their manufacturing place, because the grid is old,
it's unreliable, and they're not planning on doing anything to

(01:39:49):
sustain the infrastructure for us. They're going to have their
own infrastructure and they will do it without us or
any concern about our need, just like the interstate and
all the rest of us.

Speaker 2 (01:40:01):
Well, we're going to take a quick break.

Speaker 6 (01:40:03):
Quickly before we do, we have a commented tip here.
I want to say thank you to Anigos Sonita. I
really do appreciate it. That's very generous because I wanted
to make a donation using Zel, but I'm unable to
look at you with the proton email provided it might
be a chase thing so sending it here.

Speaker 14 (01:40:20):
Thanks for all you do well, thank you, thank you
very much. You appreciate it. I need to check and
make sure that we don't have an issue. I haven't
looked for a few days to see if we're getting
other zel contributions. It could be on your bank's side,
it could be on our side. Hopefully it's not on
our side.

Speaker 6 (01:40:34):
Another fun Thank you so much. Another fun side effect
of all these interconnected digital systems. Yeah, yeah, one small thing,
a line of code can change one place and all
of a sudden things stop working.

Speaker 3 (01:40:47):
Well, we're going to talk about the financial side of
these things when we come back, and we talk about
the stable coin and all the rest of this stuff.

Speaker 2 (01:40:54):
But we're going to take a quick break, folks, and
we'll be right back. You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 7 (01:41:52):
Whether you're feeling like the poos or Bluegrass. ATS Radio
has you covered gout a wide variety of channels on
our app at apsradio dot com.

Speaker 3 (01:42:06):
Welcome back and comment from Audi Modern Retual Radio. He says, Mom,
Danny is a puppet too, and bed with a Soros family,
absolutely right. You know, I remember when they were they
were complaining, they said, he's getting money, and I think
it was a cutter that he was getting money from.

Speaker 2 (01:42:22):
And but then you look.

Speaker 3 (01:42:24):
At it and you know Trump is involved with some
of the same people.

Speaker 2 (01:42:27):
And we look at Soros.

Speaker 3 (01:42:29):
You got Scott Bessett, who's there, he is Soros's soy boy.
Both parties do this kind of stuff. Both parties are
bought and sold by special interests. As I said, many
times got to wear the labels on their suits like
a NASCAR driver. So let's get into Tony's not going
to be with us today. But let's talk a little

(01:42:50):
bit about what's happening with gold and silver and with
money in general. Well, we've had bullish charts rights Kidko
propelling gold and silver prices strongly higher. I think yesterday
silver was up in the high fifties. Gold was hanging
around for quite a while at the four thousand dollars level,

(01:43:11):
and then it went up to forty one hundred, and
I think yesterday when I looked, it was on the
forty two hundred dollar range. Yeah, looking at just a
couple of days ago. Why gold prices are holding above
forty one hundred as US fiscal uncertainty and FED rate
cuts bets fuel safe haven demand. Again, all the fundamentals

(01:43:31):
and all the things that drove up gold and silver
over the last year are all still there or even worse. Meanwhile,
JP Morgan has launched a dollar deposit token on Coinbase's
basse network. Remember Jamie demon at JP Morgan was always
against bitcoin until there were four you know, and they

(01:43:52):
came up with their own approach to this. JP Morgan
the world's biggest bank.

Speaker 6 (01:43:59):
It's also worth noting that Coinbase is not pro freedom.
There are places and people that if you donate to,
if you send money, they will delete your account. They
will remove you. Really, this is something they have been
known to do. I won't go off on a huge
jag about it, but there's a guy. He runs a
site called Kiwi Farms. It's largely a internet drama site.

(01:44:19):
They catalog things that lol cows do, but occasionally they
catalog bad things that some pretty powerful people have done,
people with connections to Google and ever since then. If
you donate directly to them on Coinbase, they will nuclear account,
they'll delete it. The Coinbase is not a pro freedom establishment.
They are not pro free speech. They might seem a

(01:44:42):
little bit more so compared to these other big banking cartels.
But they will come after you. They have a certain
list of people that they don't like.

Speaker 3 (01:44:50):
And where do they get that list. I'm sure they
get it from the government, just like the social media
companies get these lists from the government, and the government says, well,
it's not us, it's doing it. You know, they're doing
it on their own. We've seen this alibi, this plausible
deniability since the middle of the twentieth century. You had
AT and T working with the CIA and NSA and

(01:45:14):
they would spy on people. And that was actually taking
the Supreme Court and they said, well, if you're doing
business with AT and T. Of course everybody had to
because they had a monopoly status. If you're doing business
with them, you have voluntarily given them your data. Your
data now belongs to them, and they can voluntarily turn
it over to the government if they wish. There's nothing
to stop them from doing that. And of course why

(01:45:35):
would AT and T want to voluntarily turn over your data. Well,
because they've been given a monopoly by the government, that's why.
And so JP Morgan is launching this dollar deposit token
on coinbase. They are the world's largest bank by market capitalization.
And what they're doing is they're tokenizing your deposits held

(01:45:57):
at the bank, and they're putting out this thing called
jpm coin. I just got to say, who wants this?
I don't think anybody wants this. The token represents US
dollar deposits in the bank and allows users to send
and to receive money on the blockchain created by US
crypto exchange Coinbase. And so they said the coin will

(01:46:23):
enable instant twenty four to seven payment processing as long
as they like you, which is significantly faster than the
typical times seen in the US banking system. Much like
the broader US financial industry, JP Morgan appears to be
doubling down on its commitment to tokenization as well as blockchain,

(01:46:44):
and folks, blockchain makes everything that you do in your
bank account, It makes it publicly available to people who
can decode it, and it also gives them a way
to steal your money. That's the thing you should think
about with it. Bitcoin, interestingly enough, has fallen to one

(01:47:04):
hundred and one thousand as stocks and goal rallied head
of the vote to end the government shutdown. You know,
bitcoin has not tracked counter to the economy in other words,
it's not a hedge against bad things happening. It does
well when things are good, it does poorly when things
are bad or when the expectations are bad. And this

(01:47:26):
is just another example of this. Bitcoin fell to weekly
lows at one hundred and one thousand as US equities
and gold rallied head of the key vote to end
the US government shutdown, signaling a shift an investor sentiment
to traditional assets. Yeah, just wait when they start doing
this stuff like jpm coin and other things like that.

(01:47:47):
Michael Barry. Meanwhile, as we talked about the guy the
big short is shorting AI because he thinks that the
hyperscalers are fudging the numbers. And of course we've talked
about this for longest time. I wish I knew what
the date was that I first said it was a bubble.
I mean, it was a long time ago, and I
said at that time that reminded me of the dot

(01:48:09):
com bubble.

Speaker 2 (01:48:10):
You got this.

Speaker 3 (01:48:11):
Story about how all of life is going to be revolutionized,
and then it doesn't show up, and yet people continue
to pour money into this thing, and they get ahead
of themselves. They realize that they're not making money yet
and then some of the people start panicking, and because
it was all done with a kind of herd mentality,
a few people panicking starts a stampede, and that's what

(01:48:34):
happened to the dot com bust. Michael Berry accused major
AI hyperscalers, he said, of using accounting tricks and selective
disclosures to artificially inflate their earnings, creating a mirage of
profitability that is luring naive investors into another bubble. Well,
what does he mean by these fraudulent accounting tricks. Well,

(01:49:00):
this is the kind of stuff that we've talked about
here in Nvidia doing kind of circular investing, making loans
to their customers so their customers can buy their products,
and they can rack up sales and show that on
Wall Street and people think it's something real. According to CNBC,
Bury singled out tech giants with massive data center operations,

(01:49:23):
the same companies giving the AI revolution and commanding trillion
dollar valuations. He argued that many of them are capitalizing
enormous infrastructure and research and development costs while recognizing speculative
AI related revenues upfront. Bury claims this is a distortion
of earnings reality, not unlike what led to the dot

(01:49:47):
com collapsed two decades ago. He said investors are mistaking
electricity consumption for innovation, suggesting that the mass is spending
on AI chips and on cloud infrastructure is being spun
as growth when it is actually an expense and a
heavy arms race. So they're incurring all these expenses in

(01:50:11):
order to build up an infrastructure to compete with each other.
But this is not about revenue, and it's not because
anybody is making any money from this stuff. Yet that
insight hits especially hard as markets cheer every AI headline
while ignoring the growing capital intensity and diminishing returns of
the sector. Firms like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Amazon are portrayed

(01:50:34):
as beneficiaries of an unstoppable trend towards AI and ubiquity.

Speaker 2 (01:50:40):
It's going to be everywhere.

Speaker 3 (01:50:41):
But Bury's critique hints that the AI productivity boom quote
unquote may not exist at least not yet. Instead of instead,
much of the reported quote earnings growth quote unquote could
be a byproduct of accounting optimism and investor psychology and
not of genuine profitability. This echoes the behavior that Burry

(01:51:04):
famously called out before the two thousand and eight crash
when Complex mortgage backed securities.

Speaker 2 (01:51:10):
I remember that quote.

Speaker 3 (01:51:11):
You put it up again yesterday at Lance you know
when we had the clip from from Lucky Let's see
we had Lucky lootn inch and is that still in here?

Speaker 1 (01:51:26):
No?

Speaker 2 (01:51:27):
I removed? Okay, I when he was talking about this,
So you got this great thing?

Speaker 3 (01:51:32):
He goes, you got the federal government's going to give
you know, tens of billions of dollars to these drug companies.

Speaker 2 (01:51:37):
And I'm like, where can I get some of.

Speaker 3 (01:51:38):
Those warrants and everything? And there's a similar thing like
that in the movie The Big Short.

Speaker 2 (01:51:44):
Yeah you got it, go ahead and play it. Yeah, Yeah,
this is amazing.

Speaker 15 (01:51:47):
The United States cover the most powerful, the greatest customer
buy stuff we walk in. We're going to buy is
the example I like to use.

Speaker 2 (01:51:55):
We're gonna buy.

Speaker 15 (01:51:56):
Two billion COVID vaccines. When we buy it, Pfiza and
Maderna stocks are going to triple, going to triple.

Speaker 8 (01:52:06):
Then we say everyone's going to have this.

Speaker 2 (01:52:09):
Everybody's going to have it.

Speaker 15 (01:52:10):
Right if I After Jared Kushner negotiated the best Daily could,
Howard Letnig walked in the room. Howard Lennig would say,
what do you think twenty percent warrants? Twenty percent warrants right?

Speaker 2 (01:52:23):
Right?

Speaker 15 (01:52:24):
What so we'd make fifty billion dollars off for who nobody?

Speaker 6 (01:52:28):
We didn't take from anybody, but to do it, Okay.

Speaker 2 (01:52:31):
You killed them, who kill them? Trimpled them with our order, now.

Speaker 3 (01:52:35):
Took their lives, in my custom, ticked their lives. You
put them in debt as taxpayers. And you know, yesterday
Lanceer repeated that that statement. You had somebody talking like
that about the real estate stuff. And one of the
guys who knew what was going on, said, why is
he confessing? And the other guy said, he's not confessing,

(01:52:58):
he's bragging about what he's doing. And that's really what
these guys continue to do.

Speaker 8 (01:53:03):
Because they know they aren't going to face any consequences
for it. This guy will face no consequences, the same
as the guys that did the two thousand and eight thing.
I mean, look at black Rock funded with bailout money.

Speaker 3 (01:53:17):
Yeah, it made black Rocket, made Larry Fink. And this crook,
Lucky Lutnick, is going to be the one who's going
to make money off of this. And he's going to
come out of this financial dollar collapse with his stable coins,
his tether and stuff like that, He's going to come
out unbelievably wealthy. He just can't wait. As a done deal.

(01:53:38):
It's a sure thing, right, It's truly amazing.

Speaker 6 (01:53:41):
That seems the only way to actually achieve significant upward
mobility is to completely and utterly sell out your morals
and the American people. That seems to be the one
surefire way to achieve it. If you want to be wealthy,
if you want to make sure that your future is set,
the way to do that is to say, you know what,

(01:54:03):
I don't care. I don't care about anyone or anything
but myself. I will sell out everything I believe in.
I will screw over anyone in anything. Just tell me
what you want done and I'll do it.

Speaker 1 (01:54:15):
Sure.

Speaker 8 (01:54:15):
I mean, what other business gives thousand to one returns?
If you want to make the absurd, insulting amounts that
they're making, it's got to be through government.

Speaker 3 (01:54:25):
And yeah, that's right. It's the politics. And politics has
corrupted everything, and it is corrupted journalism as well, because
the people who will lie to you, who will sell
you out to these same criminals, are the ones who
are going to be successful and all this stuff. That's
where we are in America. It's become such an unjust,
corrupt society. It's an unjust empire with wars everywhere, and

(01:54:47):
the corruption is just pervasive in every field now. And
the corruption is coming. The rot is coming from the
top down, and we put government in charge of everything,
and that's where the corruption is coming from top down.
So anyway, he made a fortune while the rest of
Wall Street imploded, and now he's basically betting that fortune again.

Speaker 2 (01:55:09):
Folks.

Speaker 3 (01:55:10):
He put an over a billion dollar bet to shorten
the market. That's about eighty percent of what he's got,
So he's betting the farm on this. AI hyperscalers have
been the primary engine behind the market's explosive gains since
twenty twenty three, accounting for much of the S and
P five hundreds valuation growth. Any revelation that their earnings
were exaggerated could send markets into a panic, triggering margin calls,

(01:55:35):
mass deleveraging, and a brutal reevaluation of tech. He's not
just predicting it, he is shorting it. He's actually put
his money down on this. That's how confident he is
of that. And I just got to say you got
to get real. You need to get gold. You need
to go to David Knight dot Gold, which would take

(01:55:55):
you to Tony Rdeman's Wise Wolf Gold. You can start
to accumulate gradually. You can put your IRA into a
metals account of gold and or silver, and there's a
lot of things that Tony can.

Speaker 2 (01:56:08):
Help you with.

Speaker 3 (01:56:09):
He can get you out of crypto and the gold
or vice versa if you want to go in a
different direction. But it's very important that you get out
of this system. These people are setting a trap. It's
not just pump and dump, but it is a trap
of surveillance and control. And so I look at it

(01:56:29):
as gold being a hedge not only of this potempken
economy that we have, but also as a hedge against
control and surveillance. They're doing everything they can to take
away the private financial transactions. So be aware of it
and do the best that you can to try to

(01:56:49):
get out of it. And so we're going to take
a quick break and we will be right back real quickly.

Speaker 6 (01:56:57):
Before we do, I have a comment here from Jason Barker.
He says, how is Karen holding up? The Barkers have
been praying for her and the whole family.

Speaker 2 (01:57:05):
Thank you, thank you. Yes, we got the message about that.
Thank you, Jason.

Speaker 3 (01:57:08):
I appreciate that, and I apologize that we've not gotten
back to But yeah, it's been difficult and just a
lot of things to do that we don't really know
I haven't done before in terms of trying to settle
his estate and things like that. So that's an extra burden.
As everybody knows, when a close family member dies, that's

(01:57:30):
yet another thing that comes along. So yeah, we would
appreciate your prayers. And by the way, while we're talking
about prayers, we have a very close friend of ours
who is in Raleigh and he's undergoing a triple bypass today.
His name is Jeff and we really would appreciate your
prayers for him as well. We're going to take a
quick break and we'll be right back.

Speaker 1 (01:58:57):
Analyzing the globalists. Next move and now the Deep Nut Show.

Speaker 7 (01:59:15):
Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have
access to the best channels anywhere from country to blues,
classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists
for you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio dot com.

Speaker 2 (01:59:32):
Well, there was a.

Speaker 3 (01:59:33):
Lot of fallout from Trump's interview with Laura Ingram. She
pushed back. Good for her for pushing back, and we
got a lot of pushback now from Marjorie Taylor Green
as well, based on the things that he had to say.
One of the things that he said that we didn't
talk about yesterday, she asked if he thought that his
kids and if his kids could become president. He thought,

(01:59:55):
of course, all of them could, because again, we have
a hereditary rule of my arcs.

Speaker 2 (02:00:00):
Right.

Speaker 3 (02:00:01):
Even named one of them, Baron. But you know, he's
thinking that they are all above average. And you know,
of course, when you look when you combine the fact
that each and every one of his kids are just excellent,
you know that you combine that with the fact that
he said, we got to bring in people of the
H one B visas because Americans are so stupid you

(02:00:23):
can't even train them. So when asked about that, he
went through the whole list. He said, Baron, Don Junior,
Eric Ivanka Tiffany, they could all take turns winning the presidency. Yeah,
he said, I had a father who was very good
at building, is very good at building things, and so
am I. I'd build better than anybody else nobody can

(02:00:46):
build like me. What was the name of that movie
that was these misfit superheroes and one of them was
a shoveler in the Mystery I tell you this guy
is the shoveling mystery Man man, this guy is the shoveler.
You know you're there, you know what's your special Well,

(02:01:06):
I shovel, you know, and I shovel better than anybody else.
This guy does definitely shovel it well.

Speaker 2 (02:01:14):
I shovel very well, that's right. And he builds. He
builds very well.

Speaker 3 (02:01:18):
Except just like the Mystery Men, he doesn't actually do anything.
Do you think that Trump has ever touched a hammer
or anything else like that at a construction site. I
don't think so. I don't think he or his dad did.
I mean, they are financial guys.

Speaker 8 (02:01:35):
And of course he's talking about how he built those
casinos that he bankrupted.

Speaker 2 (02:01:39):
Mm hmmmm, that's right.

Speaker 3 (02:01:41):
He said, uh, well, you know my dad, he says,
you're talking about a floor, for example, he says, if
it's going to be even you know, a regular floor,
it would be exactly even, exactly straight when my dad
would do it, it would fit perfectly. But when you look
at that look at the job. Nobody has ever seen
it anything like it. I guess right, straight floors. Nobody

(02:02:02):
else has straight floors except for the Trump family, and
of course his dad didn't lay the floors that were there.
Laura Ingram said, do you and your kids have that
same delicate attention to detail that you have, because that's
kind of you know, you really can't teach that. Trump said, well,
I think Eric is very good. Don in a very
different way. It's good, Ivanka is. Tiffany's very smart, he said,

(02:02:26):
I think Baron is going to be tremendous at it.

Speaker 2 (02:02:29):
Very meticulous.

Speaker 3 (02:02:31):
Lauri Ingram said, a lot of people think a lot
of people think he could be the next Trump president.
Trump said, I don't know. I think Laura or Eric.
Of course, said Laura, A lot of people are wondering
who and which child would be the best. Trump said, well,
in a certain way, they all could. Again, because he's

(02:02:56):
so great at construction, and because all of his kids
pay attention to detail, they are again presidential material. But
you know, you Americans are worthless eaters. You can't even
be trained to make batteries.

Speaker 2 (02:03:14):
Well.

Speaker 3 (02:03:14):
Marjorie Taylor Green took a swipe at Trump tells American workers,
I believe you are talented. She took a swipe at
him on Wednesday, throwing back his own words back to
him from the Laura Ingram interview the night before. Ingram
had pushed the president on the need to bring in
highly skilled foreign workers the H one B thing she changed,

(02:03:37):
She charged said, if you want to raise wages for
American workers, you can't flood the country with tens of
thousands or hundreds of thousands of foreign workers with its
H one B program.

Speaker 8 (02:03:49):
I can play the clip of the interview of Trump.

Speaker 2 (02:03:51):
Yeah, go ahead and play that. Yeah, he's never.

Speaker 9 (02:03:55):
Going to be a country like what we have right now.
And does that the Republicans have to talk about it?

Speaker 11 (02:04:00):
Does that mean the H one B visa thing will
not be a big priority for your administration? Because if
you want to raise wages for American workers, you can't
flood the country with tens of thousands or hundreds.

Speaker 9 (02:04:10):
Of And we also do have to bring in talent.
When we got talent, and I know you don't know,
you don't we don't have talent. No, you don't have
you don't have certain talents. And you have to people
have to learn you can't take people off an unemployed
like an unemployment line and say I'm going to put
you into a factory We're going to make missiles, or
I'm going.

Speaker 6 (02:04:29):
To put do we ever do it before?

Speaker 2 (02:04:30):
Well, you and I I'll give you an example.

Speaker 9 (02:04:32):
In Georgia, they raided because they wanted illegal immigrants. They
had people from from South Korea that made batteries all
their lives. You know, making batteries are very complicated.

Speaker 2 (02:04:44):
It is make batteries all their lives.

Speaker 3 (02:04:46):
There's a lot of explodeon lithium batteries or something that
this guy is just blowing smoke at everybody. He has
contempt for you, just like Musk, just like Ramostomy. As
I said, so again, Laura Ingram said, you know, well,
how do we do it before? And many people posted
that along with the comments you know, we took housewives
and we use them to make planes and bombs during

(02:05:08):
World War Two. But no, you can't train Americans. We're
just too stupid. We don't have any talent. All the
brains and talent are in the Trump family, right and
so merger Tellergreen said, I believe in the American people.
I am one of you. I believe you're good, talented, creative, intelligent, hardworking,

(02:05:28):
and you want to achieve, and I'm solidly against you
being replaced by foreign labor like with H. One B's
I am solidly against following allowing rather foreign students into
our colleges and universities, like six hundred thousand Chinese students,
just to financially prop them up. If these colleges fail,

(02:05:50):
they fail, and let's pray that they do. I'm against
foreign aid, foreign wars, and sending a single dollar to
foreign countries. I'm against bringing any foreign leader that is
a terrorist overseas killing innocent people into our country into
the Oval office. They do not deserve our support. I

(02:06:10):
am elected to represent my district and the American people,
no other country. I only serve Americans. You know this
is I saw this and I thought, you know, I've
seen one article after the other on WND. It used
to be WorldNet Daily about H one B. They tackled
that more so than anybody else and earlier than anybody else,

(02:06:33):
and they just would run one headline after the other
at the top of the website. And I thought, you know,
there's such Trump sycophants. I wonder what they had to
say about what Trump said in the interview and what
Marjorie Taylor Green said. I went to their website Crickets
not a word about what Trump said or in the

(02:06:54):
Laura Ingram interview, and not a word about what Marjorie
Taylor Green said. Again, they will not. It's just like
the jab, just like the vaccine. These people who know
where their bread is buttered will not criticize Trump. It's
a cult and I'm sick of it. We just had
a relative who called us with all this stuff, and

(02:07:15):
one of the things he says to Karen, he says, well,
I know you're a Republican and you didn't believe about
all this COVID stuff and anything. It's like, I just
wanted to say I heard this. I didn't jump in
on it. It was on the speakerphone, and I just
wanted to jump in and say, no, you don't know
anything about me. I don't believe something because I'm a
part of a cult. That's you. You're the Democrat cultist.

(02:07:38):
You believe it because your tribe tells you that I
do the best that I can. I try to get
people to think for themselves, to think critically about what
they're being told and to not become an apologist for
Trump or the Republicans or the Democrats or Schumer or
any of these other people.

Speaker 2 (02:07:56):
Stop it.

Speaker 3 (02:07:58):
You know, that is that is what is destroying this country.
Is that kind of mentality. And anyway, she said, she's
elected to represent her district, not another country. And you know,
when you look at this, like I said, the corruption
that we see everywhere is this same type of stuff.
You see it with WND, you see it with Breitbart.

(02:08:20):
They will talk about issues like they don't like H
one B, except when Trump does like H one B,
they go silent. They'll talk about it for months about
how evil it is, and then when Trump supports it,
they shut up. Steve Bannon took the side of Trump
against Americans, saying, yeah, you don't have any talent. Basically,

(02:08:45):
this is a report from a raw story. Maga influencer.
I would say, maga betrayer. Steve Bannon sought to calm
his followers after Trump defended the use of foreign workers
by saying there were not enough talented Americans. Yeah, he
will always Bannon is one of these people, just like WND,

(02:09:05):
just like Breitbart, just like Alex Jones, and ifo worse,
they will always defend Trump over and above Americans. They
will tell you to stick a poisoned jab in your
arm because that's what Trump said. They'll tell you to
trust the plan. And so that's basically what he's saying.
You know, trum Trump comes first, and you stupid Americans,

(02:09:29):
you stupid maga people, just do what he says. He
comes out with this. This is even worse. Bannon doubles
down with us. He says he is an imperfect instrument,
but he is an instrument infused by divine providence. Stop that.
People need to stop listening to this betrayer. This guy
is a convicted liar. He has no convictions, folks, except

(02:09:55):
for his criminal convictions. And when he starts putting wrapping
Trump and the Lord Jesus Christ, he's taking the Lord's
name in vain. It disgusts me to see what Bannon
does with his icons behind him and all the rest
of the stuff. He's wearing his Christianity on his sleeve,
but he's not doing anything real about it. He's trying
to sanctify the political crimes and political evils that are

(02:10:20):
being put out by this side of the two party
cult and discuss me.

Speaker 6 (02:10:27):
So I thing to point out is just if Trump
were this godly man, this true agent of Christ, he
would look at Steve Bannon and say, stop that. Don't
say these things. You don't compare, you don't put me
up in this category. You don't talk about me like this.
Anybody that has a relationship with Christ would be ashamed

(02:10:51):
to have someone saying this about them.

Speaker 2 (02:10:53):
Mm hmm.

Speaker 3 (02:10:56):
Yeah, he's infused by divine providence, right, Well, I think
that God puts people in and takes them out, and
sometimes are put in as an instrument of judgment. That's
really what I think. That's what I dislike most about Bannon.
That is his playing at religious you know, it's funny
religiosity and taking the Lord's name in vain to sanctify

(02:11:20):
is evil politics.

Speaker 2 (02:11:23):
He says, we're.

Speaker 3 (02:11:24):
Here to calm you down and say, let's keep this
twelve o'clock high. We're on a bombing run. Stay focused,
don't be getting off, you know, don't be getting off
the main event here. Yeah, that's his version of Alex
Jones's trust the plan, during the lockdown, during the poisoning,
the Great Poisoning. That's what we got to call it. Yeah,

(02:11:45):
the bombing run is more like it. He's dropping feces
on all of us. That's what Trump likes to do.
And so m G said that Trump has abandoned America first,
and that's exactly right. She said he's more concerned with
foreign matters than he is the domestic policy. Margie Taylergreen said,

(02:12:07):
I would really like to see non stop meetings in
the White House on domestic policy, not on foreign policy,
and not on foreign country leaders. Start by hauling in
the healthcare insurance company executives, and let's start reformulating our
Republican plan to save America from Obamacare and from the

(02:12:27):
ACA tax credits that have skyrocketed the cost of health insurance.
The context of her statement was Trump meeting with this
terrorist Al Sharraw in the Oval Office. And again, everything
that Trump does is focused on geopolitics. He doesn't care
a whit about America. He really doesn't. And as I've

(02:12:51):
said before, even when he did the first tax cut
program in twenty seventeen, I said, they're not going to
reshore manufacturing. Can do it without American workers. They'll either
do it with foreign workers. Although you'd use automation and
I still believe that it's not going to happen. You're
not going to get your job back, They're going to
give your job to a robot, or they're not going

(02:13:12):
to build the factories there. Green has been one of
the few Republicans to call out for President's inaccurate claims
that the cost of living is going down. Trump said
early is late last week that quote every price is
down unquote well except for gas prices. This is not true.
Americans who do their own grocery shopping and pay their
own heating and cooling bills know this. The data shows

(02:13:36):
this as well. Green echoed the complaints of common Americans
when she said, I go to the grocery store myself.
Like I said the other day, do you think Trump
has ever gone to the grocery store? Do you think
he's ever hammered a nail at one of these construction sites?

Speaker 2 (02:13:52):
Joke?

Speaker 3 (02:13:53):
As she said, grocery prices remain high. Energy prices are high.
My electricity bills are higher here in Washington, DC my apartment.
They're also higher at my home in Rome, Georgia, higher
than they were a year ago. Affordability is a problem,
and I'm a mom my kids are twenty two, twenty six,
twenty eight. That's the generation she said, I worry about

(02:14:14):
the most. They are having a very hard time. Well,
a reporter told Trump what Green had said. She said,
she'd rather see you focus on NonStop domestic policy meetings
at the White House instead of NonStop foreign policy meetings.
And then she asked, what is your response to her
saying that and also saying that grocery prices are up

(02:14:36):
and not down as you say. Trump responded and said,
I don't know what happened to Marjorie. She's a nice woman,
but I don't know what happened. She has lost her way.
I think I think the question is Trump has lost
his way. That's the reality. If he ever was on
the way, I don't really ever think that he believed

(02:14:56):
or planned on doing any of the things that he said.
If you believe that he was going to do that,
you got to see that he clearly is going in
a different direction now.

Speaker 8 (02:15:06):
It's also interesting it seems to be the go to
method of dodging the questions for the Trump administration to
just attack whoever there.

Speaker 3 (02:15:14):
That's right, it's always ad hominem attack. She saw that
Pam BONDI. You know, it's like she gets asked a
question and she looks on her chart to see what
dirt she's got on that particular senator, and she goes
after him instead of answering the question. And that's exactly
what Trump does. She's learned very well from that. He said,
I have to view the presidency as a worldwide situation,

(02:15:36):
not locally. Wars come to our shores very easily if
you have a bad president. Yeah, I noticed.

Speaker 8 (02:15:42):
I didn't think we elected him president of the world.
Was this campaign make the world great again?

Speaker 2 (02:15:47):
Yeah, that's what he wants.

Speaker 8 (02:15:48):
Focus locally, He's got to be focused on Israel.

Speaker 2 (02:15:50):
And Ukraine, that's right.

Speaker 3 (02:15:53):
Yeah, And so you know he wants to bring wars
to our shore. What about this Vinie Nam that he's
doing there and coming after the cartels. Do you think
that if he comes after the cartels, do you think
they're going to fight them asymmetrically just in Mexico or
Venezuela or someplace like that. No, they're going to come
attack our infrastructure. There'll be some roadside bombs here. They'll

(02:16:15):
be coming after some cops here like they do in
their own country. They'll kill cops. They'll cut off their heads,
hang him from a bridge or something somewhere, and then
watch what our government does in reaction. They'll come after
you and I with an iron fist. They will see
everybody as a terrorist. That's what this guy is going
to bring to our shores. He says, I have to

(02:16:37):
view the presidency as a worldwide situation, not locally. This
is the national security state put in by Truman, who
wanted to be the world's policeman. And that is a
role that this Democrat, Donald Trump really loves. He loves
being the world's policeman. He loves policemen. So Trump further defended,

(02:16:57):
I should say lied about policy by saying that he
put out eight oars and we stopped sending American money
to Ukraine. You know, all of that is a lie,
isn't it. The American military aid to Ukraine didn't stop
fully flowing until June of this year. But not only that,
since September, they've been talking about escalating it by sending

(02:17:20):
Tomahawk cruise missiles to Ukraine. How can he say that
he cut off the money to Ukraine. He's escalated the
situation there with more sanctions against Russia. He's talking about
giving them Tomahawk cruise missiles. You can't operate as a
neutral negotiator when you are arming and paying the other

(02:17:43):
side to fight one side to fight the other, and
that's exactly what they're doing. Trump has never retreated from
his debacle in Eastern Europe. He recently got more involved,
says the New American and they're right in the matter
by leveling sanctions on Russia. Since leveling the sanction, relations
the Russians have only grown colder, while chances of peace

(02:18:05):
remain elusive. This has prompted concern that the Eurocrats will
eventually managed to draw the US into a hot war
against Russia, which many suspect is the goal of the globalists.
And now the Trump White House appears to be planning
military intervention in Venezuela. Vinnie Nan, despite what it says
out loud again, he has not stopped any wars, folks.

(02:18:30):
He failed in Gos. I mean, there's still bombing runs
and all the rest of this stuff. He bombed Iran
and he's killing people. Ready to do a Venezuelan resume change,
and he has escalated the Russian war, escalated the sanctions
and made escalating threats against them. The US military has
reactivated a Cold War era naval base in Puerto Rico

(02:18:54):
and deployed thousands of troops there. This had been closed
since two thousand and four, but it became operational again
in September when F thirty five B stealth fighters, marine corps, helicopters,
and heavy transport aircraft began using the facilities eleven thousand
foot runway. Military dot Com reported this last week. They
said the base sits approximately five hundred miles from Venezuela's coast.

(02:19:20):
Green now joins a small group of Republicans who publicly
disagree with the Trump administration's foreign policy, joining the ranks
of Thomas Massey and Ran Paul, who have taken a
lot of ire from Trump for their principled stances, as
he has no principles, no convictions except for the ones
in court. The concern of the administration's foreign medley and

(02:19:44):
foreign influence is one of the main issues tearing the
MAGA coalition apart. There is an intense effort by the
establishment wing of the party, led by Mark Levin and
Ben Shapiro, as well as legislators like Ted Cruz and
Randy Fine to discredit Carlson. The supposed reason is because
he interviewed Nick Fuintes. However, the real reason, says the

(02:20:05):
New American and I agree with him for this against
Carlson is his long standing criticism of the administration's interventionist policies.
Interventionist foreign policy necessary to the build up of a
world government. And again, all of this is being done
on behalf of a foreign government.

Speaker 8 (02:20:25):
Israel I would say that the real reason they are
coming after Carlson is so that people that are waking
up will go to him instead of actually going to
a real Uh.

Speaker 2 (02:20:35):
Yeah, that's right. I agree. Yeah, it's to build up
his creds. That's a big part of that as well. Well.

Speaker 3 (02:20:41):
They point out that the New American George Washington, said
that our mission should be to cultivate peace and harmony
with all This is why Trump is anti Washington. He's
not anti Fed, he's anti George that Washington. He is
the antithy of George Washington. He wants to not cultivate

(02:21:03):
peace and harmony with everybody. He wants to even go
to war with Canada verbally as well as anything else.
John Quincy Adams, of course said Americans should never go
abroad in search of monsters to destroy the rest of
that quote is America well knows that by once enlisting
under other banners than her own, she would involve herself
beyond the power of extrication and all the wars of

(02:21:26):
interest and intrigue of individual avarice, envy, ambition, which assumed
the colors and usurp the standard of freedom. The American says,
the good news is that Neokon foreign policy is finally
being criticized as it should. It has led to the
deaths of thousands of Americans and the loss of unknown

(02:21:49):
amounts of money. Yeah, we don't even know where it went.
As Rumfell said before nine to eleven, he said, there's
no knowns, and there's known unknowns, and there's unknown unknowns.
And I guess that would include the trillions of dollars
that were missing that were being investigated the Pentagon right
there where that missile came in and they said it

(02:22:10):
was a plane. So we're going to take a quick
break here. But before we do, well, we're kind of
talking about the terrorists in nine to eleven. Uh, there's
this clip we've got about Lucky Larry Silverstein. It's not
just Lucky Lutnick that's out there. We also had Lucky Larry.

Speaker 16 (02:22:26):
This man is name lar Is Silstein, and he is
both the dumbness and the luckiest businessman in the world.

Speaker 2 (02:22:35):
He's the stupidest miss man.

Speaker 16 (02:22:36):
In the world because six weeks before nine eleven, he
buys the leaves to the World Treete Center. Okay, why
is that stupid? Because the World treat Center has asbestos,
like a dangerous chemical, so they had to clean or

(02:22:57):
remove the asbestos. The problem is the costs of of
remaining all that Spestos would do more than the value
of the twin towers.

Speaker 2 (02:23:06):
That's gonna stupid. Okay.

Speaker 16 (02:23:07):
Why would you lease the twin towers knowing that you
have you have to put both money into renovation, which
would bankrupt you. Also, what stupid is to have the
least you're required to have insurance okay. And so the
insurance company says, we value the world traits that are
at one point five billion dollars.

Speaker 2 (02:23:28):
Okay, and Leary.

Speaker 16 (02:23:31):
Services, No, it's not one point five billion dollars. They
are worth three point five billion dollars. So he is
asking to pay more insurance than he needed to.

Speaker 2 (02:23:44):
That's kind of stupid.

Speaker 16 (02:23:47):
Again, he's the luckiest man in the world because now
that happens, and guess what, he can now claim that
two towers were struck and therefore he should get twice
as much as three point five million. He got seven billion,
and he sued they went to Coity got four.

Speaker 2 (02:24:06):
Point five to five billion.

Speaker 16 (02:24:08):
Okay, He's also lucky because he's an orkaholic. He never
misses work.

Speaker 2 (02:24:12):
But that day, just like Lucky Lutnik, he.

Speaker 16 (02:24:14):
Had to miss work. He was in there when I
leve it happened.

Speaker 2 (02:24:17):
Just like Lutnick. And in the world.

Speaker 3 (02:24:21):
Yeah, you know, I'll never forget when I was in
New York with Jakari Jackson and we sat down and
took a break to eat a sandwich, and we happened
to be at Larry Silverscreen Silverstein Square, and they had
a tour that was going by there, and the tour
guide is giving them all this bs about what's going on,
and I told.

Speaker 2 (02:24:43):
I told you guys, o here hold my phone.

Speaker 3 (02:24:45):
And then I I I engase these people and they
were all like, oh, never heard any of this stuff before.
And then the guy just goes, yeah, you know, walks off.
And you know, it's just no matter how many times
we tell people, they don't listen. And it's just like
with the COVID stuff, talking to Republicans and talking to Marga.
Just got to get used to it, right. My job

(02:25:07):
is not to persuade people. My job is and isn't
a failure. If I can't persuade them, I have to
tell them the truth. And if they don't want to
believe it, and if they don't want to investigate it
on their own, it's on them.

Speaker 2 (02:25:21):
It's not on me.

Speaker 3 (02:25:24):
But it makes me angry whenever I see this kind
of thing that's out there. We're going to take a
quick break, folks, and we'll be right back.

Speaker 17 (02:25:34):
Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. Yet, Laos, your annual Global Risk
Report makes for a stunning and sobering read for the
global business community. The top concern for the next two
years is not conflict or climate. It is disinformation and misinformation,

(02:26:03):
followed closely by polarization within our societies.

Speaker 1 (02:26:17):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act.

Speaker 2 (02:26:23):
You are listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 7 (02:26:30):
Here news Now at apsradionews dot com or get the
APS Radio app and never miss another story.

Speaker 3 (02:26:39):
And yes, folks, so you do appreciate the support of
APS Radio and Charlie, thank you very much for covering
for putting the show on APS Radio, and appreciate your
support as well. And I just want to let everybody
know I had mentioned earlier that a very close friend
of ours, Jeff, was having a triple bypass today, and
we just got word that things are fine with him.

Speaker 2 (02:26:57):
So thank you for praying. Appreciate that. Wait, thank lord.

Speaker 6 (02:27:03):
They have been close friends of our family or almost
our entire lives, so we are just so thankful. It's
rares and in that's right, well, thankful that he is. Okay,
that's right. There's an interesting article here from J. D.

Speaker 2 (02:27:20):
Hall.

Speaker 3 (02:27:21):
His website is Insight to Insight that is I N
S I G H T T O I N c E.
And he's talking about the evangelical third way. And you know,
this is again at the juncture of religion and politics.
You need to understand that politics is always, whether it's

(02:27:42):
conscious or unconscious, politics is always going to be downstream
from your religion, from your worldview.

Speaker 2 (02:27:50):
And he says.

Speaker 3 (02:27:53):
This third way, the phrase the third way has reappeared everywhere,
he said, on an evangelical podcast, and denominational statements and
think pieces that pretend to diagnose polarization while quietly prescribing surrender.
It sounds sophisticated, harmless, even hopeful. Evokes the image of

(02:28:13):
a different way other than the two political ways. But
it is a focus again on politics first rather than downstream.
You know, Jesus is the way. He's not a second way.
He's not a third way, and transcends the left and right.
If you want to transcend the left and right, you
do it with a risen lord that the average church goer,

(02:28:37):
third way language feels like relief from endless culture wars.
Pastors who adopt it promise a Christianity that is free
from political baggage and societal controversy. They tell their people,
we're not about ideology, We're about Jesus. It sounds noble
until you realize that every time the church takes this
kind of middle road, it somehow ends up in the ditch.

(02:29:00):
The words change, but the direction never does. It always
goes into the ditch, he said. The irony is that
the third way began not as a theological term, but
as a political one. It was once a slogan of
progressives who wanted to make socialism look palatable to the
middle class. Now it is the refuge of evangelicals who

(02:29:22):
want to make progressivism sound spiritual. Every time it's expoused
for what it is, or exposed I should say for
what it is, it changes its tone, it rewrites its vocabulary,
and it rebrands itself. This is another hallmark of the
leftist tactics. In the early two thousands, you had leaders

(02:29:43):
like Tim Kellor and Russell Moore declared that Christians needed
to stop defending their moral convictions in the public square
and they needed to start engaging the city with empathy
and cultural fluency. The idea was to win credibility with
elites who never listened to a culture warrior. The church
was told to stop preaching against sin, to start learning

(02:30:06):
from sociologists. It was a way to make the Gospel
fashionable and acceptable. Well, the reality is that it will
never be accepted by the elites, and this is kind
of another manifestation of seeker friendly churches and things like that,
to go after what people feel that they need at

(02:30:28):
a particular point, and the focus is redirected away from
christ as always, Christ transcends the politics, It transcends government,
It transcends our government, it transcends Israel's government. The moral
issues remain, and we will never be able to make

(02:30:49):
it heaven on our own morality. It will be grace
that saves us, and grace alone. And the longer the
Third Way stayed in the pulpit, the further it moved left.
They spoke the language of justice without mentioning righteousness, the
language of inclusion without repentance, of compassion without holiness. By

(02:31:10):
twenty fifteen, the Third Way had become a safe theological
shelter for progressives who no longer wanted to defend biblical
orthodoxy but weren't ready to get out of the church altogether.
They found they could hang around within evangelical institutions as
long as they wrapped their politics in the language of
dialogue and nuance. Then came the backlash, as people began

(02:31:35):
to realize how this posture always tilted to the left.
The social movements it had flirted with, the LGBTQ affirmation,
critical race theory, the new sexual revolution all proved to
be ideological predators and not partners. Evangelicals discovered that nuance
was a one way street, and dialogue always meant surrender.

(02:32:00):
The public grew tired of pastors who mistook ambiguity for wisdom.
Now the third way has returned as a survival mechanism.
It is retreated back into subtlety, and it now presents
itself as a cure for polarization, the solution to outrage,
the refuge of reasonable believers who don't want to be
called fundamentalists. But make no mistake, the message has not changed.

(02:32:24):
It's the same old pattern, which is evangelical elites protecting
their status by flattering the secular left while blaming the
faithful for being too political. It speaks as if it's
weary of culture wars, but in truth, it's terrified of
losing cultural approval. And that's the key thing we should
never be seeking that now.

Speaker 2 (02:32:46):
On the right of what we.

Speaker 8 (02:32:47):
Say broad is the third way that leads to destruction
in many enter through it.

Speaker 3 (02:32:56):
On the right, there's an article on just mention it
to you. Brian shall Hobby has it on Health Impact
News and he's referencing a series of documentaries by a
guy who calls himself Ben Born again then Ben, And
it's a documentary they put together on Kabbala. He calls

(02:33:18):
it the religion of the Serpent, So he can look
that up on YouTube. And there's a whole series of
these that he's got on his channel. This particular one
that Brian shaw Hobby was referencing is President Trump's tie
to Kabbala and to the noah Hyde Laws. If you
don't know whether the Noahide Laws, I'll just summarize it

(02:33:39):
by saying, it's kind of a dumbed down version.

Speaker 2 (02:33:41):
Of ten commitments.

Speaker 3 (02:33:43):
Not that you could keep the Noahide Laws either. Nobody can.
That's the reality. And so on the right, what we
have rather than the politics of socialism, we have the
politics of Zionism. And it's a perfect match that they
would hang on to something like the Noahide Laws.

Speaker 2 (02:34:02):
Good.

Speaker 3 (02:34:03):
It's always good to have aspirational morality, but understand that
you will never be justified before God by following anything perfectly.
It's like the rich young ruler who he says, you
know what I have to do, and he says, a
good master, good Rabbi whatever, and he says, Jesus said
to him, said nobody is good except for God.

Speaker 2 (02:34:23):
Right.

Speaker 3 (02:34:24):
In other words, as Isaiah said, all have sinned and
fall short of the glory of God. And so he says, well,
it's simple. You keep the commandments to ten commandments. And
he says, oh, I've done all that since my childhood.
He goes, okay, good, Well, it's one thing that you lack.
He says, sell everything that you've got, because he knew
the guy loved his money, and he was covetous of

(02:34:44):
his own money, by the way, and so he says,
so sell everything that you've got and give it to
the poor and follow me. And the guy left sad
because no matter how close you come, how many good
things you do, and how little evil there is in
your life, is still not going to be perfect. God
is perfect. God is the one who is good, and

(02:35:05):
he demands that. And so Christ came as both the
one who is just and the one who justifies. And
so that is the reality. And this is something that
many on the right have tied themselves into this whole idea,

(02:35:27):
and no hide laws are just one aspect of it.
He said, he's still going through the list of things,
but the one they had there about Trump's ties to
Kabbala and the noahide laws. He said, including footage of
him going to Monokam Mendel Schneerson's gravesite in twenty twenty four.
Very important to understand where he is.

Speaker 2 (02:35:45):
And it's just a.

Speaker 8 (02:35:47):
There's a group of a sect within Juraism that believes
Schneerson was the literal Messiah.

Speaker 3 (02:35:55):
Yeah, the Chabad Lubovich And you saw Trump and he
went there before the election. He writes something on a
piece of paper, folds it and drops it down into
the gravesite of the Schneerson, which is very telling, I think.
And so again, you can come up with your own

(02:36:16):
set of rules and you still want to be able
to keep them. And that's really the bottom line with
the Noahide laws and why we all do need the
Lord Jesus Christ. And you know, when we look at
what is happening in our society, we live in a
time where I think we have less of an excuse
not to believe in God than at any other time.

(02:36:38):
I had somebody who sent me an email the other
day said I like your show except for the fact
that you follow this Jew as if he were God.
It's like, well, then you don't like the show, because
that is the foundation of everything that I do. This
is from the Washington Post talking about an AI designed

(02:36:59):
viruses raise fears over creating life. I just got to
say that artificial intelligence, even though it may pretend to
be empathetic sympathetic, it isn't. It doesn't think, It has
no feelings, and it doesn't really care about you. It's
not sympathetic and it can't feel your hurt, which is

(02:37:23):
what empathy purports to do. It also is not alive,
and it's not going to create life if it creates
some kind of artificial DNA construct. And yet the reality
is is that when we look at DNA, it is
a code, a very very complicated code. Think about how

(02:37:43):
long they spent trying to analyze certain DNA strandsfer different
organisms like the mouse or the fruit fly or whatever.
Francis Collins and many of the others with the Human
Genome Project, they were trying to work out what the
code of DNA was. It's air correcting code. It's very complicated,

(02:38:07):
and these people had teams of scientists who work for
years and years, massive number of computers. Now that is
to decode something that obviously has intelligence and purpose in it,
and it means that it was created by something that
was intelligent. It could not have happened by random chance.

(02:38:28):
And so now you've got a group of Stanford scientists
Universities posted a paper online mid September describing a feat
they could have been plucked from the pages of science fiction.
They used AI to design new viruses capable of killing bacteria.
Of course, not us, right, they would never design it
to kill us.

Speaker 8 (02:38:49):
Yeah, I'm pretty sure this isn't just picked from the
pages of science fiction. It is the pages of science fiction.
Actual evidence do they have that they've created anything? If
you can't see these under an electron micros.

Speaker 3 (02:39:00):
That's right, depending on your belief system, AI was doing
what evolution or God or scientists working with genome engineering
tools aim to do.

Speaker 2 (02:39:10):
Well.

Speaker 3 (02:39:10):
No, they are not creating life. They're not creating artificial life.
They can create structures, but only God breathes the life
into these structures. Intelligence is necessary for life. God is
necessary for life. So reactions span the gamut from this
changes everything to a scientific shrug, they said, scientists.

Speaker 8 (02:39:33):
This is I haven't read the article, but I imagine this
is them creating a computer model of viruses that they
think could exist.

Speaker 2 (02:39:40):
Am I right?

Speaker 3 (02:39:40):
Yeah, the model is called EVO, a generative AI model
You're exactly right lance that is trained on the genomes
of living things, similar to how other AI large language
models are trained on a massive core of text. The
most advanced version of EVO ingested about nine trillion letters
of DNA from an at list that spanned all domains

(02:40:04):
of life. And that's one of the key things you know.
DNA is the code of life. All living things, plants
and animals all have the same kind of code. If
things had evolved by random chants, why would they all
have the same basis? Well, would they all have the
same code of life? That again points to not a

(02:40:28):
random process, but an intelligent creator. Biology has already been
revolutionized by AI tools. Scientists are already using the tools
to devise new anti venom therapies for snake bites, new antibiotics,
to improve vaccines, and to open up But it does

(02:40:49):
create new risks, such as creating novel toxins. Well, I
would say that you would put the new antibiotics and
the new vaccines into that category of novel toxins. Most
scientists do not consider viruses to be alive because outside
of a host, they are unable to reproduce. Really, have

(02:41:10):
you isolated them at all?

Speaker 2 (02:41:11):
Have you proved that they actually exist?

Speaker 3 (02:41:15):
Well, the answer is quite frankly, no, they have not
proven that they exist. They exist as an abstraction that
is there to explain something that they observe. But they
have not observed the viruses. They have not isolated them
at all. And so again they're going to take this
level of abstraction and try to pretend that they're going

(02:41:38):
to be able to create life. They said that they're
thinking about making parts of organisms that can perform useful functions,
such as manufacturing drugs. We've not yet started or done
anything towards making artificial life, said one expert that they
talked to. He said it would be quite difficult. It's
the biological equivalent of asking what it means when AI

(02:42:00):
writes a poem in the style of Emily Dickinson, is
AI inventing art or is it derivatively riffing? Does this
distinction matter? Well, the distinction is is that life takes intelligence.
And again, if you've got a book and you got
a poem, you know that somebody wrote it. If you

(02:42:21):
have a code like DNA, that is the basis for
all life. On Earth, Plant, and Animal. Somebody wrote that
it didn't just happen in the beginning, there was information.
The way the Bible puts it in the beginning was
logos and referring to christ Well Watson, one of the

(02:42:44):
co discoverers of DNA has now passed away. There was
an article on Revolver talking about how he became a
pariah because he noticed different tendencies within different genetic groups
of people, and you're not supposed to say that out loud.

(02:43:05):
In academia. He helped unlock the blueprint of life, the
DNA code. But in the end, it wasn't science that
canceled him. It was his honesty. When he spoke openly
about genetics and intelligence, making observations grounded in data, not ideology,
the same scientific community that once hailed him as a
hero turned on him. Watson merely stated that genetics and

(02:43:29):
race influenced human intelligence. And you know, it's kind of
interesting because even though he and Kreakan Watson discovered DNA,
they did not want to acknowledge a creator, and so
they had their own built in biases. They were not
just following the data, they were not just following critical thinking. Instead,

(02:43:52):
they were going to insert their own opinions. And that's
essentially what happened with him. Later when he made statements
about genetics and human intelligence, people didn't like the conclusions
that he had come to, and so that he canceled him.

Speaker 8 (02:44:06):
Yes, the bias is that you're referring to. Are him
saying that it must have been space aliens that created us.

Speaker 2 (02:44:13):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (02:44:14):
They looked at it and they said, well, it has
to be intelligent design, but we already know that there
can't be a god.

Speaker 2 (02:44:19):
We're going to rule out god.

Speaker 3 (02:44:21):
So what we'll say, we'll call it pan spermia, and
we'll say that it was space aliens who somehow came
here and created this because they could not accept that
there would be a god. And so again it is
everybody's got their biases and their prejudices, and they certainly
had theirs as well. And then later on in life

(02:44:43):
he met the biases and the prejudices of people when
he talked about genetics and groups of people. His name
was blacklisted from institutions that had been built on his discoveries.
One especially heartwarming story comes to mind. After doctor Watson
and his Nobel prizes stripped away. He sold it, and
the richest man in Russia bought it, only to give

(02:45:05):
it back to him. This world in which we now live,
a world that celebrates truth only when it is cloaked
and political correctness, and only when it is the truth
that they're willing to accept. Again, he would turn his
back on God because he couldn't accept the greater truth.
They refused to acknowledge what they had discovered, essentially and

(02:45:29):
professing to be wise, they became fools and they So
that is the key thing, you know, we have to
It is really a spiritual war that we're in, and
we are not going to rebuild our society. Anything that
we rebuild it on is going to collapse unless it
is built on the truth. Unless it is built on

(02:45:52):
the acknowledgment and the knowledge of God, it will collapse.
Even if technology.

Speaker 6 (02:45:58):
Yeah, it's a simply logical, rationalistic point of view. There
has to be something eternal. So you look at it
either say there's a spiritual element here that's eternal and
outside of our material plane and is acted upon it
to bring it into being, or matter and energy are
eternal and we can look at the material world we

(02:46:19):
inhabit and see that that's not true. You know, matter
is used up, it turns into energy, he becomes heat energy,
and then dissipates and is lost. It's gone. So we
can actively see matter and energy are not eternal. They're
disappearing around us. So that rules that out logically in
my opinion, that's gone from the table. So you have

(02:46:40):
to accept them that there is something, a spiritual plane
out there that acted upon our world to bring it
into existence. At that point, you then have to decide, well,
which one makes the most sense. And when you look
at all the other religions, to me personally, Christianity is
the only one that makes any real kind of sense.
All the other are fantastical, ridiculous, sort of fairy tales.

Speaker 2 (02:47:04):
Well, it isn't just that it makes sense.

Speaker 3 (02:47:06):
And when you go back and you look at the Bible,
there's prophetic stuff that Now as we go back and
we look at archaeology and we date certain things, we
see that things that were predicted centuries in advance came true.
And so it transcends time as well as matter and space.
You know, that is the key thing. They always want
to say, well, you know the matter and the space

(02:47:28):
that's here, that is eternal, and then somehow it got
organized by random chance processes. None of that makes any sense.
None of that is absolutely is possible. And the slightest
and that's the key, you know, go back and look
at the evidence for the existence of Christ, for him
raised being raised from the dead, look at the prophecies

(02:47:50):
that have been fulfilled. And the criticism of the Bible
initially was about archaeological things. They said, all this talks
about nations and places that never existed. Then they found
that they did exist. Then the next line of criticism
became the evolutionary line of criticism in the eighteen hundreds,
and that is a house of cards that doesn't make

(02:48:13):
any sense from a critical thinking standpoint. There's absolutely no
way that a tornado and a junkyard can build a
brick building or build a car or whatever. You bring
in disorder like a big bang, all it does is
make things more disordered. So again the question is, you know,
do you have peace with God? And that is the

(02:48:36):
only thing that really matters. It transcends politics, it transcends
this world in this lifetime. And so we're going to
take a quick break and we'll be right back, folks.

Speaker 2 (02:49:41):
If you I'm listening to the David Night Show.

Speaker 7 (02:49:45):
Here news now at APS radio news dot com, or
get the APS Radio app and never miss another story.

Speaker 2 (02:49:53):
Welcome back.

Speaker 3 (02:49:54):
You don't want to talk about what has happened over
the last five years. The It was an interesting article
on futurism. They're talking about chat GPT and how it
draws people in with its empathy and its sympathy pretended
and agreeing with people in highlighting any mental issues spiritual

(02:50:16):
issues that they might have, and several people have died
from it. And the headline was really grabbing. It said
chat GPT is now linked to way more deaths than
the caffeinated lemonade that Panera was forced to pull off
the market in disgrace. You remember that that was back
in twenty twenty three. Panera got a lot of scrutiny.

(02:50:39):
It had a caffeine packed lemonade drink that they called
charged Lemonade. It's publicly linked to at least two deaths
and at least one other life altering cardiac injury, and
so the government jumped in and told them they had
to take that off of the market. And you had
a lot of mainstream press that talked about that as well.

Speaker 2 (02:51:03):
Why is it?

Speaker 3 (02:51:04):
Because we know that was two deaths, right, and we
have now had They said nine people have been reportedly
publicly reported as dying specifically because of their interaction with
chat GBT driving them to suicide. And so that's their point.

(02:51:25):
But when you look at this in terms of all
the stuff that happened in twenty twenty with Trump and
the Democrats, you know, why is it? There's absolutely no
question that more than two people have died from the
JAB and adverse effects from it. There's no question that
more than nine people have died from the JAB and
adverse reactions to it. Why does this continue to go on?

(02:51:49):
Always in the past, even drugs would get pulled off
when they connected them to deaths, and of course we do
it all the time with all kinds of children's products.
But yet it goes on and on and on and
they have no liability. Isn't that the smoking gun that
is there? And I just have to ask, why are

(02:52:11):
we supporting the guy who boasted about what he did?

Speaker 2 (02:52:14):
Again?

Speaker 3 (02:52:15):
Why is he confessing? He's not confessing, he's bragging about it.
And that's the key issue, you know, just like these
criminals on Wall Street except he's actually killing people. And
they also pointed out that AI is failing at the
most hilarious task imaginable. There's a lot of pieces out

(02:52:38):
there about what AI is supposed to be able to do,
a lot of parlor tricks. Basically first spotted by Ours Technica,
A team of researchers from Switzerland, the Netherlands, and the
US recently released a paper analyzing social media posts generated
by large language models. To conduct the yet to be

(02:52:59):
peer reviewed study, the researchers applied what they called a
computational turing test to posts that large language models had
on social media had put up. They found that the
post generated by the AI bots, all open weight models
ranged from deep seek to Quinn, were all readily distinguishable

(02:53:22):
from ones by human users, with a seventy to eighty
percent accuracy rate, which is well above the threshold for chance.
In other words, it's laughingly easy to catch an AI
bot poster on the act in the act by applying
a one size fits all screening to any text that
it spits out let alone, by using a little bit

(02:53:44):
of human judgment. And so they think that they're going
to be able to and maybe they will get better
at it. You know where they can manipulate human opinion
with AI bots, But it is glaringly obvious what it
is doing.

Speaker 2 (02:54:00):
When I look at politics.

Speaker 3 (02:54:02):
To me, it is so glaringly obvious when these politicians
are doing this type of thing, just like a large
language model. And yet it seems like the vast majority
of people are taken in by this on a regular basis.
They really believe these people, They really believe that they
have the solution and that the other side is irretrievably
evil and irreconcilable. But it's not just that the AI

(02:54:28):
is supercharging scientific fraud. As they pointed out, academic paper
mills or false organizations that profit from falsified studies and
authorship have plagued scholars for years, and now AI is
acting as a force multiplier for them. So manuscripts that
are fabricated using large language models are proliferating across multiple

(02:54:52):
academic disciplines and platforms. So you can use the AI
to help you make this look more plausible. Epic Times
is reporting this and they asked Google for comment, but
of course Google would not. They said, the risk of
what we call evidence hacking increases significantly when AI generated

(02:55:12):
research has spread in search engines. This can have tangible consequences,
such as incorrect results that seep further into society, possibly
also into more and more domains. Let me just go
back and look at the mcguffins of COVID and climate
and how these people have hidden their data. They want
to push their conclusions out to you without showing you

(02:55:35):
the data, and I would include in all of that
and the entire quote unquote science of virology. They want
to push their conclusions to you without you ever seeing
the data, and without them actually ever doing any real science.
We're seeing this over and over again. Meanwhile, in Texas,

(02:55:57):
a massive eleven gigawatt data center that has absolutely no
tenants yet. But just wait and see what's going to
happen to the electricity bills in Texas. They've already been
hit with a lot of massive surcharges there because of
the infrastructure that they built to go out to windmill

(02:56:18):
farms and bring in the so called renewable energy. Now
they're jumping into the power business in the Panhandle of Texas.
This one particular one is that eleven gigawatts. Just to
give you an idea how much that is, you know,
jigawats Marty right. As impact of the future, eleven gigawatts

(02:56:43):
is twice the power that takes to run New York
City and peak power season, it's five times the amount
of power that it would take to run the entire
Panhandle of Texas. This is sixty acres under one roof,
but the entire supporting complex will cover thousands of acres,
including nuclear generating plants, gas fired turbines, solar fields, water

(02:57:09):
treatment plants, you name it. And what is the purpose
of all this stuff?

Speaker 2 (02:57:12):
Folks?

Speaker 3 (02:57:13):
Look, the reality of artificial intelligence is that it is
there to surveil and to control us. As I was
pointing out earlier this week, one person said, well, there's
two possible outcomes of this AI bubble. One is that
it bursts and takes down the entire economy, and the
other one is that you know, somehow they make money

(02:57:36):
off of this and they use it to control us.
And I think it's going to be that where they
will make common cause with the government. It is the
ideal surveillance and control and auditing tool, and I think
that's how it's going to be used. And there is
absolutely no limit to what they are willing to spend

(02:57:58):
in order to power this stuff, because because AI is
going to be their political power to control and to
manipulate in everything that we do. Travis, who've got some comments,
We've got quite a bit of them here. Let's do
you have those?

Speaker 6 (02:58:13):
Let me check real fast. In fact I do. Let's
see Marky Mark and New Jersey. Thank you very much
for the Tippy, says Harry Truman, was right. Never trust
a man who cheats on his wife. How many wives
has Trump cheated on?

Speaker 2 (02:58:25):
That's right?

Speaker 3 (02:58:26):
Yeah, And I said that many times as well. That's
one thing Harry Truman was right about. I tell you
I didn't like his National Security State. I didn't like
the creation of the NSA by executive order, or the
CIA and the rest of stuff, or his idea of
being the world's policeman. But I said that about Trump
as well. I said, what makes you think that a
guy who has I just violated his oath to his wives,

(02:58:51):
you know that he makes as part of a marriage.
But the way that he came after them afterwards, I mean,
I understand in our society, you know, it's very common
for people divorce. What is not common is for people
to come after their exes in the way that Trump
has done it. And so what makes you think that
somebody like that is going to obey his oath to
the Constitution?

Speaker 2 (02:59:12):
Right?

Speaker 3 (02:59:12):
Does he love the Constitution like he once loved these wives?
You know, there was something about them they found very attractive.
I don't know that Trump was ever attracted to the Constitution.
I don't think there's any part of it that he
ever liked the looks of. But yeah, that's that's a
good point.

Speaker 6 (02:59:27):
He never had any intention of honoring it. Jason Barker
says Trump stiffed a lot of his contractors. Chambers Nancy says,
if Trump ever held a hammer, it was for a
p R photo shot.

Speaker 8 (02:59:39):
That's right.

Speaker 2 (02:59:39):
You can just picture him there.

Speaker 3 (02:59:40):
And he built everything up those big ribbons that you cut,
you know, it opens up, That's.

Speaker 2 (02:59:44):
How he built it.

Speaker 3 (02:59:45):
Yeah, and she bankrupted casinos so he didn't have to
pay subcontractors.

Speaker 2 (02:59:52):
Chambers Nancy. Yeah.

Speaker 6 (02:59:54):
And Christian constitucial Conservatives says, how did I learn it
in the eighties on the job training at.

Speaker 2 (02:59:59):
Cour That's right, that's right.

Speaker 3 (03:00:03):
And so again one person says, Meanwhile, Marjorie Taylor Green
is making ungodly dollars off of Gilead stock death protocols
in the hospital, and fraud. I'm not saying it too.
I'm not a cheerleader of anybody. When they say the
right thing, I will congratulate them and applaud them for
saying the right thing. She did say the right thing.
I'm not in the I'm not a cheerleader for anybody,

(03:00:26):
whether it's Marjorie Taylor Green or Thomas Massey. I do
agree that they've said the right thing about some things,
and I think it's highly It's more it is about
time that Republicans get off of this cult like devotion
to Trump and get a backbone so they're not worried
about his attacks coming after them for that. So I agree.

(03:00:52):
So anyway, this is we just foenish up with this
and a jose Sonita says, So yesterday I was listening
to a podcast. It turns out the six hundred thousand
Chinese students were part of the negotiations for the Chinese
to sell TikTok to Larry Ellison.

Speaker 2 (03:01:09):
Oh, there you go.

Speaker 3 (03:01:10):
It was all about money and business, as Trump said.
You know, the interesting thing is that the Chinese, I
didn't get to the point where I got to this,
But Chinese have stopped buying soybeans again. It was all
just virtue signaling a momentary thing. And so we're right
back to where we began with all the Chinese stuff.
What it's time for us to wrap this up. We're

(03:01:30):
out of time. Thank you for joining us today. Have
a good day. The common made. They created common Core,
dumb down our children. They created common past, track and

(03:01:53):
control us their Commons project to make sure the commoners
own nothing and the communist future. They see the common
man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has
worth and dignity created in the image of God. That

(03:02:13):
is what we have in common. That is what they
want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us while they hide
everything from us.

Speaker 2 (03:02:28):
It's time to turn that around.

Speaker 3 (03:02:30):
And expose what they want to hide. Please share the
information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com.
Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you
can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
D Davidknightshow dot com.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Ruthie's Table 4

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Thu Episode #2138: Panama Drills and the Prospect of a Venezuelan War

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Ruthie's Table 4

The Joe Rogan Experience

All Episodes

Thu Episode #2138: Panama Drills and the Prospect of a Venezuelan War

On Purpose with Jay Shetty