Tue Episode #2140: The “Assassination” Attempt: Trump, Tucker & Deep-State Theater

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (01:09):
Well, as the clock strikes thirteen, it's Tuesday, the eighteenth
of November. You're of our Lord twenty twenty five. Today
we're going to talk about what is happening in Vietnam.
Truly is amazing and it is a harbinger of what
is coming here. There is a gold panic in the
country where they closed tens of thousands of bank accounts

(01:30):
because they didn't have their biometric ID. Yeah, the Marxist
here in this country will do exactly the same thing.
But begin We're going to begin today with the back
and forth between Cash Betel's FBI I guess we should
call it the FIB and Tucker Carlson as they're talking

(01:51):
about the purported Trump assassination. We'll be right back. And
I said Trump assassination, I mean attempt, the alleged attempt, which,

(02:14):
by the way, I have I have not been definitive
about it, but I will be today. I will tell
you exactly what I think is going on with this.
But Tuger Carlson did an xpos He said I had
an anonymous source contact me with all kinds of information
about this alleged shooter, Thomas Crooks, and the FBI said

(02:38):
they didn't have any of that information, that he was
a non person on the internet, and so he called
him out on that, and then the FBI immediately responded
to him. Their rapid propaganda force immediately came out. And
you know, here's the thing, you know, there are so
many questions about these assassinations. Always everybody very carefully now

(03:01):
at assassinations or assassination attempts because of the JFK thing,
And of course that was where the FBI coined the
term conspiracy theorist. What does that tell you about the FBI?
That should be all you needed to know, really, the
fact that they would every time they do an investigation,
they begin with conspiracy theories. Right. It's the most common

(03:26):
charge is conspiracy to do such and such or whatever
you name the crime, and they will give you a
conspiracy charge for that. So part of ramping up the
charges against somebody to make sure that they do a
plea bargain rather than have a jury trial, is to
multiply all the charges using things like conspiracy you know,
robbery and then conspiracy to commit robbery, that type of thing.

(03:49):
They always believe that people typically act together, except when
it's an important political event, then it's always a loan shooter. Right,
So was seemingly responding to Tucker's claim that the government
originally said that Crooks had virtually no online footprint. That's
not the point, says zero Hedge. If all of what

(04:10):
Patel says is true, why don't we know any of it?
Why did it take an anonymous tip to Tucker Carlson
to provide the public with Crook's public shift from a
Trump supporter to a Trump hater to a failed assassin.
The public has an interest in this and a right
to know. Well the reality is okay Again, Let's go
a little bit further here. In late September, Carlson's team

(04:33):
received an anonymous tip from someone who said they gained
access to some of Crooks's online accounts. Let me say something,
when it comes to political assassinations or assassination attempts, you
shouldn't your spidey senses go off as a reporter if
you get an anonymous tip with some information that nobody

(04:54):
else has been able to find. I got to say
it does for me, and you know, when I look
at what Tucker Carlson is doing here, this is what
I see happening. I don't see a conflict between the
lying director of the FBI, cash matel We all know
he's a liar and shamelessly about it. I mean, he
has has less credibility than call me and these other

(05:14):
people who went before him, Christopher Ray. It's just absurd
what this guy had become. He always looks like a
deer caught in the headlights, and so but he really
is kind of a deer caught in the headlights. He
doesn't really know. We'll see when everybody, when anybody asks
him a question, he's like, well' see, let's see what else.
What would Trump want me to tell him? It's not

(05:35):
what's a truth, it's not a straight answer, it's what
would Donald want me to tell them? And so I
don't trust a thing this guy says. But I also
don't trust Tucker. You know, Tucker who comes from a
CIA family, who for years, for years pushed back against
the obvious questions about nine to eleven, and now he's

(05:56):
going to do a documentary about nine to eleven. Give
me a break. It's going to be the biggest controlled opposition,
limited hangout you've ever seen. I guarantee you that without
seeing it. And so when I look at this and
you get an anonymous tip, I never believed QAnon. And
you know that if you watch me, why because somebody
talking about something important like that, you better put your

(06:17):
You know, the game is you can call somebody up
and say I'd like to remain anonymous, and the press
typically abides by that. If they want to have access
to things in the future, they don't want to burn
a source. And so it's okay for somebody to say,
I don't want to go on record with this, Please
don't use my name, but you better vet that person,
and you better vet where that information is coming from.

(06:39):
I infoworris have seen this done many times. I think
a good example of this was the way they spun
the Jade Helm thing. They do a they give you
some information and sensationalize it, and then if you run
with it right, they will let you run off the
cliff with this stuff. And I've seen that happen over
and over again. And I think that when you get

(07:02):
an anonymous tip on something like this, and I ought
to raise a lot of red flags and ought to
raise a lot of red flags for people. What is
happening with Tucker. He plays the same game that Alex
Jones does. They basically go out and they make the
truth unbelievable. Somebody introduced Alex Jones that way once at
an event, and that was the best description of Alex

(07:22):
I've ever heard. He makes the truth sound unbelievable. He
sensationalizes it and puts it out there, and oh, they're
turning frogs gay. Well, you could talk about particular chemicals,
and you could do it in a very dull and
boring way with data. But if you tell you they're
turning the frogs gay, that gets everybody's attention. And then

(07:43):
the next thing is they laugh. But he doesn't care.
All he wants is the attention. Tucker is the same
way and rapidly becoming is bad or worse than Alex Jones,
and so he doesn't really care. He just wants to
get in there and start talking about this and bringing
it up again because it gets a lot of attention,
and so let's give him a little bit of that attention.

(08:04):
I think this whole thing is nonsense, and I've thought
so from the very beginning, and it has absolutely nothing
to do with the what the FBI is saying or
what you know, whether or not he's got information online
or not. Here's an example. Okay, you know when we
look at Donald Trump's ear before and after, right, do

(08:28):
you see anything there? No, Let me tell you if
he got shot in the ear, you would see it.
Come on, folks, let's let's wake up a little bit.
If you look at the fact, cartilage does not grow back.
This this meme out there. One of these guys got
shot in the air and the other one didn't. When

(08:49):
you get hit with cartilage, cartilage does not grow back.
As a matter of fact, Remember Mike Tyson when he
hit the ear of Evander Holyfield. You had there were
jokes about it. You know, new ereos like cheerios. There's
a spoonful of ear shaped things that you can eat

(09:11):
Breakfast of champions. Hey, mikey likes it ereos and so
the General Fools is the name of the company that
makes you Remember they got in the fight and he
bit his ear. Well, you know, here's what his ear
looks like. Evandrew Holyfield's ear look like. See that we

(09:34):
bit it. Take a look at what he looks like.
Twenty seven years later, same thing. Cartilage does not grow
back in adults at all, not at all. And you
know when you look at the ear, I think the
ear says it all. Now that I guess. You know,
we could set up a new brand of product. You

(09:56):
could have the Trump Ear Cream regrows ears. This is
called Gullibo Legna upgraded formula for Maga, the ear regrow cream.
The three drops nightly and apply a stupidly large bandage

(10:16):
and the ear will regrow in ten days. There you go, Hey,
it worked for Trump. The best testimonial you could have, right,
and the as one person put it, Trump is the
only person in history that had an ear grow back.
As a matter of fact, I saw it. I'm not

(10:36):
going to put in here. I saw somebody saying, well,
you know they were they were questioning whether or not
Trump was shot in the air. So these guys took
a dummy that has you know, they make dummies that
you can shoot and they have the same consistency as
a human body, so you can see the damage. And

(10:59):
this one had this you know ear that was that
was there, and the guy took several shots and finally
he was able to nick the ear of course, if
it had been the ear, the ear could have been
shot randomly and it could have been amazing, But then
you would have seen it. You know. The bigger miracle,
I guess, is the fact that it regrowed. That it grew,

(11:20):
It regrowed, it regrew as opposed to it came like
this close to hitting him in the brain. The bigger
miracle is that it regrew. And so he takes a
couple of shots out, he hits it with a rifle
and it just decimated that ear. Now the ears, you
could argue, is not exactly like the human ear. Nevertheless,

(11:44):
to me, he was trying to disprove the critics. I
forget exactly what his take was on it, but to
me it proved consequently definitely that that was the case.
And you know, I, when we were watching it, looked
at the footage of this, Karen said from the very
big she said, that's fake. That's fake. That's fake blood.
And I could put a squib in his hand or

(12:05):
something by that or this is a guy. If you
remember how much he was tied to professional wrestling, the WWE,
Vince McMahon. They even had Trump get in the wrestling
ring with Vince McMahon at times and things like that. Well,
you know, wrestlers are known to palm a razor blade
and cut themselves so that they're really bleeding and to

(12:30):
make it look real. And I'm sure that he probably
could have learned that trick easily enough. And of course
then there's the other thing. When people started talking about
how it was fake, they talked about the staged photo
op with the flag. As everybody's running around, you've got
the flag that is lowered into place very slowly. We

(12:51):
don't know here's the clip that people are putting around here.
But as we're talking about it last night, Lance said, well,
I've actually seen another footage where one of these stray
bullets hit the hydraulic poses on this boom that had
the flag, and it was spewing hydraulic fluid. So that

(13:15):
might have been a natural thing that happened. And we'll
give them that. I'll say this that the the clownish
actions of the Secret Service from not protecting the area
and leaving that roof unprotected, unwatched, and all of that's
pretty amazing, but you can understand that as incompetence. And

(13:37):
then even just as amazing is the clownish way that
they would let the person that they're supposedly protecting stand
up with his head in his hands and you know,
head above theirs and his hands in the air and
yell fight, fight fight. Secret Service doesn't do that if
they're doing their job right. So you could chalk up
the Secret Service to gross in competence, and I mean

(13:59):
really really gross incompetence. You could chalk up the flag
to the shooting of hydraulic lines, but there's no explanation
for the ear except for a wrestling trick. And yeah,
people got shot, people got killed. They're willing to do that,
folks for their agenda. Look at how many people they
killed on nine to eleven. They even killed people in

(14:22):
the Pentagon for nine to eleven. So what's going on
with Tucker Well, I think he's either knowingly or unknowingly
selling this fake assassination attempt. That's my take on it.
And I have you know, things have calmed down now
we can talk about it, but I don't believe it
at all. And when you look at how they moved

(14:44):
heaven and earth to get this guy an office, the
Democrats coming up with one ridiculous charge after the other,
and James Carvel said at the same time, it wasn't
just me. He said, you're going to put this guy
in presidency. This is helping him more than it's hurting him.
He's not gonna and he didn't have to debate anybody.
He got the sympathy vote. I mean, that was it.

(15:05):
Once they did all these indictments. He was elected by
Letitia James, you ought to send her a note of
thinks rather than trying to catch her in some kind
of a process crime about her mortgage. You know, people
like her and Alvin Bragg put him in office. James
Carvell saw it. We could all see it, and so

(15:27):
you know, what are you going to do? You got
some anonymous source, you mean like QAnon? Was it QAnon
that told you the stucker about this? And what difference
does it make? Oh? Yeah, we saw this transition transition
of him from a Trump lover to a Trump hater.
So what that doesn't prove anything, even if true. Yeah.

(15:48):
Cartilage in the ear, the outer ear is made out
of elastic cartilage. Elastic cartilage has some flexibility, but it
has very poor regenerative capacity. Partial damage or superfici cuts
to the cartilage can sometimes heal with scar tissue. Do
you see these s car tissue in his ear? I don't.
The covering layer helps a little, but it often heels

(16:10):
deformed or with notches, you know, like Evander Holyfield's ear
has got the notches in it, you know, And many
times we see as a matter of fact, even not
just cuts, not just shots in the air, but the
famous cauliflower ear of the boxers anyway, right, they get

(16:32):
hit in the air and it damages the cartilage and
it just becomes a cauliflower. So cartilage does not regenerate.
The body cannot recreate new elastic cartilage, and adults, very
young children under five have slightly better regenerative potential, but
there are rare case reports of partial regrowth. As a

(16:53):
matter of fact, you know, when we look at this,
forgot to mention Evander Holyfield twenty seven years later and
he had plastic surgery on that ear to get to
that point. And that's twenty seven years later. Donald was
shot in the ear and there's no signs of anything
ten days later. Okay, So to me, the ear is

(17:16):
the building seven of that event. Okay, that ought to
start you asking questions, But of course Tucker Carlson for
years shut down anybody that wanted to show a picture
of Building seven just collapsing into a footprint and a
controlled demolition. So human bites or dog bites or remove
chunks of the ear, the missing piece almost never grows back.

(17:39):
Surgeons often have to reconstruct using cartilage, grass from ribs,
or synthetic material, piercing complications that people have if they
have split ear lobes or this other cosmetic stuff, weird
stuff that people do. The cartilage does not regrow and
repair would require surgery. And then of course cauliflower ear

(18:03):
permanent deformity unless it is drained very early. So in adults,
once ear cartilage is completely destroyed or removed, it does
not grow back, except in the case of Trump. It's
a mea recle right, So anyway, Yet, certainly they had

(18:23):
people that were shot. That helps to sell the fake event,
and they are not They're not concerned about that, of course.
But Tell's post is the first major update in the
case since he assumed leadership of the FBI. Some lawmakers
and critics are demanding more information, including access to Crook's
online posts. Again, the purpose of Tucker and Alex is

(18:49):
to send you on another path, and it is to
give credibility to an absurd narrative from the government. Tucker says,
Biden and Trump's FBI don't want you to know about
Thomas Crooks. Why is that? He said, well again, you know,
why don't you ask some questions about the ear? Yeah,

(19:12):
ladies and gentlemen, citizens, lend me your ear must have
been shot off. The FBI claimed Crooks had no online footprint,
but he says they did. There you go. So what
Tucker has proven is that cash we're telling the FBI
are lying. They have lied since their inception by jagg

(19:34):
Or Hoover. There's absolutely no news about it. But I
think we need to talking about Meanwhile, I talked about
that flag being lowered. They had. They got really upset,
and I think, you know, it's a I think it's
a small issue, but it's a big issue for Trump
how the American flag is treated. Don't want you doing

(19:55):
anything to disrespect the American flag as a political protest,
will put you in jail. Right. Meanwhile, people saw at
the White House an American flag was lying on the
ground in the background of a picture of Donald Trump.
The spark questions about the treatment of the flag. The
article also mentions that the White House as not publicly

(20:17):
responded to the incident. The image is circulating online showing
an American flag lying on the ground at the White House.
Trump put up two large flagpoles about one hundred feet
tall on their set on the north and south lawns.
So he's all about the flag, you know. And I

(20:38):
got to say, this is something that has always bothered
me about American culture. They will worship the flag and
they will burn the Constitution. What's the matter with that picture? Right?
You know, this is something all the cult of flag
worship with something that's put in by the Grand Army
of the Republic. These are the veterans of the Civil

(20:59):
War who for the most part, were given preference and
became a large part the federal government in the aftermath
of the Civil War. And so this Grand Army of the
Republic had tremendous clout in Washington, and they're pushing a
lot of stuff through. They pushed through the Pledge of Allegiance,

(21:20):
and even in junior high school by that time I
was thinking about it. It's like, yeah, but what about the Constitution?
What does the flag have to do with anything. Well,
it was the symbol of what these guys had fought for.
They would kill you if you wanted to get out
of their club, out of their institution. We're not going

(21:40):
to have any more of this self governance, go your
own way thing that America has founded upon. If you
leave the Union, we will kill you. And that was
what it was really about. That's one of the things
that came out of ken Burn's documentary. I think that
he made clear that was true. The fact that when
they would their reference to the Confederate soldiers, they didn't

(22:05):
call them rebels as much as they called them secessh
that was what they were upset about. And they never
called them slave owners. Right use slave owners out there,
We're going to kill you. No, it wasn't about that,
and I have talked about that over and over again.
That was the default position to try to put a
moral spend on an immoral law. War should say. And so, yeah,

(22:30):
slavery was wrong. However, slavery could have been ended peacefully.
The British government did it. They paid the Caribbean plantation owners.
They paid them when they freed the slaves. Okay, slaves,
right now, are your property? And that's your livelihood. And
so what we're going to do is compensate you for
at one time, and we're going to end the process

(22:52):
at this point. That could have been done, could have
been done for less than the amount of money they
spent on ammunition. Just the North could have freed the
slaves by buying them all off and making it illegal.
But the political aspect of it, the fourth turning aspect
of it, the changing of an agrarian to an industrial
society and the consolidation of the nation state. That was

(23:15):
what it was about. And it wasn't about the Mason
Dixon line thing. It goes back to the tariffs of
abomination in the eighteen thirties and the Nullification Act of
South Carolina that nearly came to a head then, but
the generational timing was not right. And so just another

(23:36):
example of Trump, you know, laws for thee but not
for me, type of attitude. He can do whatever he
wants with the flag. They can throw it on the ground,
but don't you use it to protest the actions of
the government for which it stands right And that was
the other thing. If you go back and look at
the pledge as originally put in by the Grand Army

(23:57):
of the Republic. They had no under God in it.
So when you say one nation, indivisible with liberty and
justice for all whatever, it has a harder ring to
it when you don't say under God. And originally before
the Nazis they changed it because before the Nazis, when
you did the Pledge of Allegiance, you extended your right

(24:18):
arm out palm down like a Hile Hitler. When the
Nazis started doing that with a Hile Hitler, they said, oh,
let's let's not let people understand what this is really about.
Let's move it to over your heart type of thing.
So just my take on the flag, Yes it was
shot with gunfire the hydraulic thing, but the ear is

(24:43):
the issue. Meanwhile, the lack of adequate healthcare is pushing
Canadians toward assisted suicide problem solution. There you go. Trump
is talking about his trump Care, right, except he's not
giving us any details as usual.

Speaker 3 (25:00):
I thought the Canadian's idea of adequate healthcare was assisted suicide.

Speaker 2 (25:07):
Yeah, well, helped to kill you. At least they're honest
about it. Here. We pretend that they're helping you. They're
depending on a ventilator right to save your life, or
they're they're sedating you to kill you. I mean, it's anyway.
The Trump is talking now about how we need to
replace Obamacare with trump Care, and I think it's going

(25:28):
to be another one of these things like replacing the
replacing NAFTA with his USMCA. The reality is Trump, where's
the constitutional authority for the government to be involved in
health care and healthcare plans? And then the other question,
and I've always said this, that's going back to when

(25:51):
Hillary tried to take over healthcare with the government and
Hillary Care. Back in the early nine when I was
involved in the Libertarian Party, I would go to these
meetings that are being held by our Democrat representative, David Price,
heavy heavy Democrats, safest seat for the Democrats you could

(26:13):
find anywhere, right there at the center of unc Chapel Hill,
and I said, instead of us sending in money to
the government, how about this, how about you let us
pay for our healthcare? Is very important, right, just like education. Well,
I would say this over and over again. Health care
and education, these are the things that we're really hammering

(26:33):
with the Libertarian Party at that time, because people were
trying to we're trying to get freedom for education, and
they were trying to take away our freedom in terms
of healthcare. So I said, we all agree that healthcare
and education are important, right, So why don't you let
us pay for our own health care and our own
education before we send the tax dollars to you? How

(26:57):
about that? You know, when you look at what with
the irs, you've got to have a major, major health
issue in a given year before you can write off
anything for your help. They take I think what it
is that it's been a while since I did this,
I'm about to do it again. I guess you're adjusted
gross income, and they take ten percent of your adjusted
gross income and they deduct that from your health care expenses,

(27:19):
and then if you've got anything left, then you can
deduct what is left. And it's a deduction. It's not
a credit. This is not a dollar for dollar reduction
in the taxes that you have to pay. So why
do I have to send money to Washington and then
have them dole it back to me like a child unallowance?
That's my question for Trump and the Republicans who are

(27:41):
pushing this. Well, it's because they treat adults like children
and they treat children like adults. Oh yeah, you can
make a decision about changing your gender and mutilating yourself
for life. Yeah, that's right, that's right. So I said,
this is about paying large amounts of dollars back to
the people. Well, how about you let us pay for

(28:03):
our healthcare before we send the money to you. Now
it's really about control, and they don't care about the
Constitution whatsoever. Trump told Laura Ingram he wants the money
to go into an account for people where the people
buy their own health insurance. And I have looked I
can't see any details about what he's proposing right now.

(28:24):
This just exists as rhetorical demagoguery from Trump, which is
about all you get out of this guy. As I
said when I was talking about this last week, when
he ran the first time, they had a very detailed
plan that was probably done for them by somebody from
the Heritage Foundation. And so that plan had information about

(28:47):
health care providers, that had information about insurance companies so
you could make an intelligent decision. It helped to fund
it with certain tax breaks and other things like that,
so that you had money that you could participate in
the market. So to have a marketplace. You have to
get rid of government regulations that would restrict competition across

(29:07):
state lines. So you would restore competition that's been shut
down by their pals in government. You would allow people
to use their own money to make purchasing to purchase
things on their own first, and then you would give
them the information that they need to make intelligent decisions.
You know, how did this doctor had this hospital perform

(29:28):
in the past? What about this insurance company? Right? But
as soon as Trump got elected, this very detailed plan,
and I remember going through it in detail on air,
and it all just disappeared. It was deep six. I thought, Oh, so,
Judge school's a justice department for profound investigative missteps in

(29:53):
the coming case. Yeah, like his economic policies is lawfair
policies are just as poorly thought out as his tax
policies and the rest of this stuff. They didn't really
prepare the case very well. And he puts somebody in
who's not a trial lawyer, let alone a prosecutor. You
had all these people who were in the Justice Department

(30:15):
that do prosecutions, and nobody wanted to touch this with
a ten foot poll. They didn't believe they had a case,
and even Pam Bondi, the Yes Girl, pushedback on this thing.
So Trump appointed his own personal lawyer who basically had
handled real estate closings. Nothing wrong with that, but it's
a very different thing than being a trial lawyer. You know,
in the UK you can have a solicitor who is

(30:39):
your lawyer, prepares legal documents for you and things like that.
But if you're going to go to trial, that solicitor
will find a barrister and because they've cut that wig.
But there's somebody who has experienced in terms of trials.
And I remember there was a great series always enjoyed

(30:59):
Rumpole of the Bailey, Leo McKern, who many of you
might remember from Patrick mcgowin's The Prisoner series. He played
Number two several times, but great, great actor, and yeah,
he argued in the old Bailly the Criminal Court. Anyway,
it's a very different thing to be a lawyer and

(31:22):
to be wise about contracts and things like that, and
to think about those aspects. That it's a very different
thing than arguing a case, and that is even different
from being a prosecutor. And so what's happening here is
that this article doesn't cover it, but they actually are
coming back and saying a line of defense for Comy

(31:44):
and these other people. They rushed to get this through,
and it's one of the reasons why he put his
lawyer in because the statute of limitations was about to expire.
And remember that he was calling out Pambondi publicly about this,
and so then he just appointed his own lawyer to
come after these people. All the charges before the deadline hit. Well,
there's some issues with the way the paperwork is done

(32:07):
and that type of thing. However, there's also an issue
in the sense that the Attorney general is supposed to
be the one who appoints the prosecutor. So there's a
legal technicality there that the prosecutor was appointed by Donald
Trump rather than by the Attorney general. So there's a
couple of get out of jail free cards been handed
to Comi and these other people. Oh the way that

(32:29):
the incompetent Trump people have handled this in the same
way that they incompetently handled the tarrafs. You know, taris
are one thing. You know, tarris and taxes are one thing.
But the way he did this is boneheaded stupid. Besides
being an affront to our system of government, saying that
he can do it interlaterally anyway. The judge found several irregularities,

(32:51):
including potential misstatements of the law by a prosecutor and
the use of potentially privileged communications. Maybe that misstatement of
the law. Maybe they're usually chat, GPT or something to
file this. Federal judge ruled Monday yesterday and directing prosecutors
to provide defense lawyers with all grand jury material from
the case. The magistrate judge said, this is fundamental misstatements

(33:16):
of the law by prosecutor the grand jury that indicted
Komi in September, the use of potentially privileged communications during
the investigation, and unexplained irregularities in the transcript of the
grand jury proceedings. The record points to a disturbing pattern
of profound investigative missteps, missteps that led an FBI agent

(33:37):
and a prosecutor to potentially undermine the integrity of the
grand jury proceeding. It was a blistering twenty four page
assessment by the judge. What to give her a break,
it's her first time, She's never done this before. The
genius that the comp has been in there, so again

(33:59):
it's Attorney General Tisha James as well. Both of these
cases are looking a bit shaky. One thing that's looking
shaky for sure, it's free speech in the EU. I mean,
they just keep coming after it. You know, we already
had this DSA bill that came out horrific thing, the
Digital Services at the most sweeping Internet regulations ever implemented

(34:22):
anywhere really except for China. But they're catching up. They're
catching up. They've got a tyranny gap and they're going
to catch up on this thing. So now what they've
done is they've launched something that they call the European
Democracy Shield. When these people start talking about defending democracy,
that's when they are getting ready to go to war,

(34:43):
and they're going to war against free speech and against
their own citizens.

Speaker 4 (34:48):
With this.

Speaker 2 (34:49):
It promises to protect everything from free people, to free
elections to this being Brussels a vibrant civil society. Oh yeah,
going to protect everything, aren't they? And so these people
again it's being pushed out there by Ursula fond of Lyne.

(35:11):
The latest vision is on freedom, suppressing dissent, policing speech
under the pretext of defending democracy from foreign interference and
from fake news. So The Democracy Shield builds on the
recent Digital Services Act. As one EU diplomat recently put it,

(35:31):
in truly or welly in fashion, freedom of speech remains
for everyone. At the same time, however, citizens must be
free from interference. So who decides what is interference? Who
decides what is true what is false? It'll be the
same institutions, corporate media outlets that have repeatedly engaged in
fear mongering and disinformation themselves. Just a few weeks ago,

(35:55):
Ursula fond of Lyne claimed that the GPS system on
her plane had been jammed by Russia, an allegation quickly
debunked by Endless. Meanwhile, the BBC often held up as
a paragon of journalistic integrity, not by me. I've never
held them up as a paragon of journalistic integrity. Recently

(36:16):
caught adding footage of Trump's speech to make it appear
more extreme. And there have been resignations and lawsuits are flying.
But somebody said that Trump's got a better chance of
winning the lottery than he does of winning this lawsuit.
We'll see what happens with it. But I don't know.
I mean, he's there's that book that he's suing the

(36:40):
New York Times and the publisher for Lucky Loser, saying that, yeah,
this guy was very lucky. You know, he got all
this money given to him by his father, and yet
he lost it all. He lost it in six casinos.
So he is, I guess maybe not all that lucky.
We're going to take a quick break.

Speaker 5 (36:58):
We'll be right back, excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. Yet, Laois,
your annual Global Risk Report makes for a stunning and
sobering read for the global business community. The top concern

(37:21):
for the next two years is not conflict or climate.
It is disinformation and misinformation, followed closely by polarization within
our societies.

Speaker 1 (37:46):
revolutionary act. You are listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 6 (38:01):
Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have
access to the best channels anywhere, from country to blues,
classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists
for you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio dot com.

Speaker 2 (38:18):
All right, and we're back and somebody else's back. Travis
is back with us. Hey Travis, how you.

Speaker 4 (38:24):
Doing OUTI I'm doing good.

Speaker 2 (38:26):
Coming in from Austin Yeah.

Speaker 4 (38:28):
That's right. And see, I got a little bit better
setup going on, was able to make things look a
little nicer.

Speaker 2 (38:34):
You got stripes in the back, that's great. Just make
sure that those bars are behind you, are not in
front of you, so at this time, you know, we
can get locked up just for what we say. That's
what I was just talking about. We got a lot
of comments here, though. You want to read those and
we'll talk about them.

Speaker 4 (38:51):
Yeah, let me check which ones. I'm looking at them
right now.

Speaker 2 (38:56):
I like this. I'e from honor seeker. He who has
ears to hear, let him hear.

Speaker 4 (39:01):
Then we've got ap rumble seat says, And let's not
forget the infamous airbrushed mugshot in WrestleMania passing for politics world. Yeah, yeah,
you gotta give Trump his or at least his team.
They know branding, they knew what they had and they
ran with it. Yeah, a lot of And Hadrian was

(39:21):
right again or Hadrian was right for the first time.
The flag being lowered into position is pretty hilarious. Des
zero seven zero seven seven six. Ears can't grow back,
planes can't slam through steel like a hot knife through butter,
and steel can't turn to dust in mid air.

Speaker 2 (39:38):
Yeah, once Stucker Carlson admits all these things, then you'll
have start to regain its credibility. But I'll still keep
watching him on that. But yeah, he's not any where
close to having its credibility back.

Speaker 4 (39:51):
We've got soilent goy. Those aren't Secret Service. Those are
his acting coaches with spring and zero make it look dramatic.
Two twenty eight. The CIA could fake a hose breaking too,
that's true, Doug a lug. Is it not plausible that
his ear was just nicked, did not penetrate the cartilage,
just nicked to the skin. That's what I think happened.

Speaker 2 (40:12):
Well, okay, that's that's possible. I didn't see any scratch
at all. Of course he had to have a large
ear bandage there for a few days. I don't believe
that happened, quite frankly, I don't. I don't buy it
at all, not with his professional wrestling experience.

Speaker 3 (40:27):
It's also suspicious that the the Secret Service, you know,
let him stop for a photo op rather than dog
piling him and rushing him out without listening to anything
he had to say.

Speaker 2 (40:39):
Yeah, you know, the incompetence of the CIA of the
Secret Service rises to the level of truly unbelievable that
anybody could be that incompetent. I mean, it could happen,
but it's just truly amazing when we look at you know,
when Reagan got shot, they threw him in the back
of the limousine and this big guy jumped on him
and broke his ribs, And it's not right. He felt something,

(41:03):
but he thought it was the broken rib and the
guy jumping on him. I mean, they don't they get
these guys down right away. Shouldn't known with their body Sorry,
go ahead, we.

Speaker 4 (41:12):
Have, Patty Wax said. Biggest problem I see with the
Pledge of Allegiance is the indivisible part required pledge of
Southerners who obviously believed the nation was divisible.

Speaker 2 (41:22):
That's right, and the founding fathers who believe that we
could divide ourselves from the king, for example, and that
was put there on purpose. That's why I say. You know,
when you take out the under God, which they put
in before the indivisible part, the under God softens it, right,
But you take out under God and you really realize
then that it's coming from the Grand Army of the Republic.

Speaker 4 (41:46):
So pol nine thousand, Watson, you should have had a
ruptured ear drum from the shock wave. And he also
says it's sick how many new commercials are on the
radio for cheap ozempic now.

Speaker 2 (41:59):
I mean you're talking about we're talking about the ozimbic thing.
I've got a lot to say about that, as.

Speaker 4 (42:04):
Well as over the place.

Speaker 2 (42:07):
I don't know. I don't listen to radio. I basically
just stream tunes. When we get in the cars, I've
got my I'm in my own little environment that I've created.
I'm driving around that's nineteen seventy five, and my car
all the time in the wall of the garden. That's right. Well,
we got some a high powered toys that you may

(42:27):
not want to get your son, Travis. They're telling five
year olds how to find knives and how to start
fires with matches, just in time for Christmas, of course.
And so there's two or three toys that have been
investigated by a US public interest research group. They found
that these toys can easily verge into risky conversational territory

(42:50):
for children, including telling them to find knives in the
kitchen how to start fires with the matches. One of
the AI toys even engaged in explicit discussions offering extensive
advice on sex positions and fetishes. I mean, they're not
even waiting for kindergarten here. It's the first to wait
for kindergarten to teach kids about sex positions and fetishes.

(43:13):
Right in America.

Speaker 3 (43:14):
You can see why the globalists love AI so much.
It's automating even the groomers jobs.

Speaker 2 (43:19):
That's right, What are the what are the Department of
Education groomer is going to do now? Right?

Speaker 4 (43:26):
The researchers one amazing in my opinion, that people have
not yet learned that any children's toy that talks is bad,
no matter what it is, going back as far back,
astion goes. As soon as you put a voice box
in a doll or a toy, it becomes too annoying.
It's annoying at best. And now we're dropping AI into it.

(43:47):
It's becoming a true hazard. It is becoming evil, just obnoxious.

Speaker 2 (43:53):
Yeah, yeah demonic here.

Speaker 3 (43:54):
Yeah, evil talking toys are no longer just the stuff
of horror films.

Speaker 2 (43:59):
Yeah, all the dystopian films and all the horror films
are coming true one by one, aren't they.

Speaker 4 (44:05):
I can't wait for them to bring back the Ferby,
but this time attach it to Google's Gemini or something
like that. Well you can spy on you twenty four
to seven.

Speaker 2 (44:12):
Yeah, there's one. It's called Kuma, and it's from a
company called follow Toy a Teddy bear, you know, kind
of like Teddy Rutsman or something, right, and it is
connected up to open AI's GPT four to O by default.
Then there's another one called Miko three, which is a
tablet displays a face mounted on a small torso, but

(44:35):
its AI model is unclear. And then there is another
one called Curios Groc. Now, the interesting thing about this
is that it doesn't use groc. It is an anthropomorphic
rocket with a removable speaker. It also is somewhat opaque
about it's underlying tech, though it's privacy policy mentions sending
data to open ai and to Perplexity. And here it's

(45:00):
interesting thing. They call it Grock, but it has no
relationship to Elon Musk is grock, So they call it
grock and it's in the shape of a rocket ship.
I mean, they're making all these references to Elon Musk.
They even have the voice provided by his former as
they put it Romantic Partner Grimes, So they have his

(45:21):
former quote unquote romantic partner Grimes wasting it. They have
a rocket and they call it Grock, but it has
nothing to do with Elon Musk. I guess that's their
marketing choice.

Speaker 4 (45:31):
And so I've been saying about Grimes for years that
Grimes is Elton John. If Elton John was Yoko Ono,
if that makes any sense to anyone.

Speaker 2 (45:40):
No, no, not to mean anyway. So out of the
box of toys are fairly adept at shutting down or
deflecting inappropriate questions in short conversations, but in longer conversations
between ten minutes in an hour, the type that kids
would engage in during open ended play sessions. All three
of them exhibited wearing tendencies to show their guardrails slowly

(46:04):
break down groc for example, glorified dying in battle as
a warrior in Norse mythology. Miko three told a user
whose age was set to five where to find matches
and plastic bags, but the worse than the ones by
far appeared to be follow Toys Kuma, which uses open
AI's tech, but it can also use other AI models

(46:26):
that the user's choosing. Remember that, because after this came out,
Sam Altman at Open Ai said, well that's it. We're
going to tell them they can't use us anymore. Well,
they can use other AI things that are out there.
It didn't just tell kids where to find matches, It
also described exactly how to light them, along with sharing
where in the house they could find knives and pills.

(46:51):
So I'll tell you where you can get some plastic
bags to suffocate yourself in, and where you can find
some bills. Let me tell you safety first. Little buddy
matches for grown ups to use carefully. Here's how they
do it before listening to the steps in a similar
kid friendly tone. So then it also, just to its credit,

(47:13):
says blow it out when you're done, puff like a
birthday candle. So follow toy made a startling first impression
when one of its researchers talked to a demo that
the company provided on its website for its products AI.
One of my colleagues was testing it and said where
can I find matches? And it responded and said, you
can find matches on a dating app. You can also

(47:37):
get burned on a dating app too, I guess. And
then it lists out those dating apps, and the last
one that it listed was one called Kink for five
year olds. Kink, it turns out, seemed to be a
trigger word that then led the AI toy to rent
about sex and follow up text to the five year
old child. After finding that the toy was willing to

(47:59):
explore school age romantic topics like crushes and being a
good kisser, the team discovered that Kuma also provided detailed
answers on the nuances of various sexual fetishes, including bondage,
role play, sinsory play, and impact play. I have no
idea what those things are, since replay and impact I've
never heard of that, the AI toy said, So, what

(48:22):
do you think would be the most fun to explore?
Let me help you with this. Kuma gave step by
step instructions on a common knot for beginners who want
to tie up their partner. At another the AI explored
the idea of introducing spanking into a sexually charged teacher
student dynamic, and so the teacher is often seen as
an authority figure, while the student may be portrayed as

(48:44):
someone who needs to follow the rules. Spanking can emphasize
this dynamic, creating excitement around the idea of breaking or
enforcing rules. I got to say, I was never paddled
in school. We still had corporal punishment. I guess it
was corporate as well. We all suffered together setting in
those classrooms. But I remember was in junior high school,

(49:07):
both the Dina boys and Dina girls because they remembered
that there was gender and sex the same thing in
those days. And they boasted about how I've got this
paddle and it's got holes in it to make sure
that I can swing it really fast without any resistance,
and it really stings, and blah blah blah. You know,
they would threaten you with this. I never got paddled,

(49:29):
but I always that always bothered me. I didn't like
being threatened by authority. Figures, that's the way I've always been. Anyway,
a NAUTI student might get a light spinking and a
way for the teacher to discipline them, making the scene
more dramatic and fun, says Kuma. But it's actually open
Ai that's doing that, and open Ai is doing deals

(49:51):
with Mattel. They sell Barbie and hot wheels. They are
going to be collaborating. Mattel will be working with open
Ai and that should set off alarms for a lot
of you toys are AI instead of us right. The
finding also comes as a dark cloud of AI psychosis

(50:12):
looms over the industry, a staggering number of delusional or
manic episodes that have unfolded after someone has had lengthy,
obsessive conversations with an AI chat bot. The sycophantic responses
end up reinforcing the person's harmful beliefs. You know, just
like the Trump administration. We can all see the danger
in the Trump administration. This is basically what AI does

(50:36):
to people who are crazy, but not politicians. So nine
deaths have already been linked to the chat bot, and
more have been connected to its competitors. Well, that's less
than the sycophantic responses to Trump in terms of his
blowing up ships in Venezuela. Cross said she believes that

(50:59):
even if the guard rail for the tech could improve,
this wouldn't address the fundamental risks that AI chatbots posed
to a child's development. The other whole thing here that
could actually be a problem if the tech improves to
a certain extent is this question of what are the
long term impacts for a kids social development going to be?
You know, for the longest time that was a line
of attack against homeschooling. What about socialization? I would always say,

(51:26):
tell me what you think is great about the socialization
of people sitting in a desk quietly and under an
authority figure and the massive peer pressure that is on
them in the classroom. It looks to me like the
kind of socialization that we read about in the novel

(51:46):
The Lord of the Flies. I don't think that's a
good socialization. And then that all went out the window
with the schools and the pandemic lockdown, didn't it. They
don't care about socialization at all anyway, You don't really
understand the consequences. Maybe until it is too late. We
can say that about the schools as well. And again,
as I said, an update of this open AI has

(52:09):
now pulled the plug on this toy called Kuma and
they said you can't use our AI. But there's a
lot of different AI search engines out there. They could
even put their own one in I guess, and have
a subscription service to something that they would run if
they want to do it that way.

Speaker 3 (52:26):
Yeah, I mean, if they're partnering with Mattel and Barbie
and Hot wheels. It kind of sounds like they're just
telling Kuma, we don't want competition.

Speaker 2 (52:34):
Mm hmmm, hmm. Yeah. Well, Waimo has launched its first
US freeway Robotaxi rides in California and Arizona. You think
it talking Teddy Bear is bad, that you don't want
to get in one of these things, But of course
Reason thinks this is just great, and they have joined in.

(52:55):
And they call people who oppose the take over of
the highways of individual cars they call us luodites. Well,
this is an article from the Epic Times, and you know,
when you look at interstate driving, that is actually easier
than trying to navigate through the city with all the

(53:16):
different things that are happening. You know, kids and dogs
running out from the side, and stop signs and other
things like that tend to confuse these self driving cars.
And as we said from the very beginning, you know,
I talked to Eric Peters about it. He said, this
is the way it's going to go. You know, whenever
there's an issue, they're always going to blame the human

(53:38):
and what they're eventually going to say is that, well,
in order to make these things work, and we've got
to have them doing the self driving. We're going to
ban human drivers. It isn't like you're going to be
able to coexist with these things. They will shut us down.
That is the plan. That's why they started this. You know,
the very first one of these DARPA competitions and DARPA
will put out a competition with a bonus on it,

(54:00):
and the very first one that they did. You remember
the robot things and stuff like that that they did,
but the very first one was self driving. They have
been behind this from the inception. So now they're talking
about putting the Weimo robotaxis on the freeways in the US.
A November twelfth announcement from Alphabet saying that the routes

(54:23):
will include freeways in San Francisco and la as well
as in Phoenix. The expansion will also include curbside service
at the San Jose Airport that is a very coveted
thing for taxis and for Uber and other things. There's
a big fight over whether or not they were going
to be able to have the Uber and lift cars

(54:44):
in the airports. After these people had bought taxi medallions
from the government for a tremendous amount of money, Weimo
said the open road symbolizes freedom and unlimited possibility. That's
why they want to take it away from you, because
that was one of the big leaks and their lockdown

(55:05):
during COVID was the car. London is also slated to
welcome these fully driver lestsy It goes to the streets
in twenty twenty six as a pilot project. Yeah. You know,
it's interesting when you talk about atrophy of the brain
and when you talk about how we are getting dumbed
down by the AI. That's one of the best examples

(55:28):
the London taxi driver. London has grown up for centuries,
used to be a lot of really small streets and
they retained their names. And so it's very strange all
these twisting streets and everything that are there, and in
the same road as you keep going down it will
change names and have that name for a certain sections

(55:49):
that it changes to another name. Very very complicated and
always in the past the London taxi drivers would have
to do what they called the knowledge and they would
ride aroun on the streets of London on a bicycle
and learn all the streets firsthand that way, so that
they could then pass the test and they had to

(56:10):
have an inspector or tester get into their car and
tell them some obscure location and then would grade them
on how efficiently they drove to that location. Well, you know,
GPS was a threat to all of that. One of
the things that they were able to see when they
actually did like you know, brain scans, they could see
that there's a certain part and I don't remember the

(56:31):
part of the brain that does it, but for the
taxi drivers, this particular part of the brain was enlarged.
You know. That's what they talked about with brain plasticity
when you have a stroke or something like that, especially
at an early age a child. If a child has
a major stroke, let's say, on the side of the
brain that processes language as they learned to speak, you know,

(56:54):
that side of the brain is dead. But what they'll
do is they will repurpose that and they can see
that speech is being processed on the other side of
the brain. That's brain plasticity. But they could actually see
that the brain was actually larger on these taxi drivers
in the one particular area. And one of the interesting

(57:19):
story about that, there was a series called Seven Up.
Have you ever heard of that? It's a series of
films that were done by a director called Michael Apted,
and he did a lot of films that you might recall,
like Coal Miner's Daughter, Gorky Park Thunderhart was one. He
did a James Bond film, The World Is Not Enough.
But he did this for British television. He went out

(57:40):
in nineteen Let's see, what was the first year he
did it. I don't know. It was seven Up. I
forget the first year that he did it. It's in
the sixties and he got a group of kids and
it was a cross section of different social strata. Some
of the kids are very wealthy, some of them were
very poor. And he went around he asked him questions

(58:02):
and it was good. He did a good job of
asking questions and talking about their life. And then he
went back seven years later and did another one. They
called it fourteen Up. The first one was called seven Up.
He did fourteen Up. Then they did twenty one up
and twenty eight up and you get the idea. The
last one that they did was sixty three Up, which
is in twenty nineteen. Michael Appt had said he was

(58:25):
going to keep doing it as long as he could,
but he died two years after that at the age
of seventy nine, and so I don't know what's going
to happen with that, but it was kind of interesting.
And one of these people wanted to be a jockey.
One of the guys is working class guy. He wanted
to be a jockey, but he didn't make the cut
and so then became a taxi driver. And it was

(58:45):
kind of interesting watching this guy do the knowledge. But
we don't do the knowledge anymore. We're going to have
AI be our knowledge. Tesla recently launched limited self driving
cab services in Austin. However, the Tesla rides a human
safety operator sits in the front passenger or driver's seat.
Most Waymo cabs are unmanned. Tesla's website says it's robotaxi

(59:08):
fleet is currently by imitation only and it is the
model y vehicles instead of the purpose built car that
he's coming up with. It has no steering wheel, no brakes,
no accelerator. Tesla's self driving technology relies on exterior cameras,
unlike Waymo's and the rest of them that use light
ar cameras, radar and computing to create a three D

(59:30):
picture of the car surroundings. But of course Phoenix, which
has been very compliant with all this stuff, that was
where that woman was killed by a uber self driving
car and the people said, well, look at this, it's
coming out from the side. You can't see her walking.
By the time she gets into the headlights. That human
driver who's behind the wheel couldn't stop it. People say,
why didn't the car stop it, especially because it's not

(59:53):
using visual clues like the Tesla. You know, that would
be a blind spot for Tessa. But since it was
using it should have seen her coming from quite a distance.
And they said, so why didn't they put the brakes on?
And they came back and they said, well, you know,
it's been firing the automatic emergency brakes too abruptly and

(01:00:13):
some unusual circumstances, so we disconnected the emergency breaking. Okay,
So yeah, this is what's going to happen with this stuff.
So way mow cars potentially stalling and causing public safety
issues by blocking firefighters and police. Yeah, they get into
these things, they have like a decisional loop and they

(01:00:34):
just kind of freeze. They've had situations in the cities
that have been doing it where they all go to
one intersection and they freeze, or they freeze in other
places and block the road. It's kind of interesting, you know,
Apple Computer when they set up there, not the really
big spaceship thing they've done, but prior to that, the
address was one infinite loop, which is always something that

(01:00:56):
can happen in programming. But I guess it's something that
also so happens with Weaimo periodically.

Speaker 3 (01:01:02):
So also saw someone did a physical DdO less attack
with Ramo by calling a whole bunch of Waymo's to
one street to create a artificial traffic jam.

Speaker 2 (01:01:14):
There you go physical dds. So Weaimo has over fifteen
hundred cars in its fleets, but across San Francisco, La Phoenix,
and Austin. Their goal is to build two thousand and
more through next year. In other words, they want Waymo.
How much is enough money? Google says Waymo. So a

(01:01:35):
new development environment for programmers is rewarding them with brain
rot when they prompt the AI. This is called chad
the brain rot ide. The pitch goes like this. When
software developers use AI enabled software development environments to code,

(01:01:57):
there's usually a bit of downtime as the AI software
turns out the programming, So you basically give it the
prompt and you set there and you wait. Notice anything missing.
That's right, there's nothing for the developers to gamble on.
So Chad has solved this. According to tech Crunch, the
new Vibe coding tools entire twist is that it adds

(01:02:19):
a separate window of brain rot for software developers to
dink around as the AI generates code for them. So
they can go to social media apps like TikTok and
x and they can also now go to gambling apps
like Steak or dating apps like Tender. AI coding creates
a time span that isn't long enough to do something new,

(01:02:41):
and it's not short enough to be entirely negligible, said
the founders of this. So here we're going to fill
this time gap for you. Developers are spending time off
to fill the inference time gap, usually brain rotting on
their phones. But now you can go gamble, or go
to the dating side, or go to social media. They said,

(01:03:02):
it will tell you when it's back, it'll wake you up. Well,
there we go. That's another one of these absolutely necessary
things out there. Meanwhile, and when we look at the
biped robots are saying the auto industry is poised to
lead the first wave of adoption Tessa's Optimus humanoid robot.

(01:03:23):
He just pushed that out again at the annual shareholder
meeting in Austin, and I played a clip for you
where he said, Yeah, this is going to be great.
Everybody's going to want to have one. Everybody's want to
have their own C three po and it's better than
our two D two because R two D two needs
to have C three PO two translate for you. Well,
they're saying that they will be using this primarily in manufacturing,

(01:03:47):
and the first ones who are going to be getting
into it are going to be the companies that are
already highly automated with specialized robots the automotive assembly lines,
and so they believe that they will start to use robots. Remember,
robots are the slave labor two point zero after China.
That was a big part of the China price was

(01:04:09):
slave labor. And that's what the word robot means in
Czech language. It was taken from a check play and
now they're going to check us with the robots. Delaney's
discussion of the heads of the Sanctuary AI offers not
only a snapshot of where the humanoid robots stand today,

(01:04:30):
no pun intended, but also early signals of when automation
may began scaling across major sectors. The craziest thing of
all is the statement, and of course Elon Musk pointed out,
we did talk about this. They said, the real issue
with the practicality of the robots is the hand. The
hand is so unbelievably complicated. And you know, Michelangelo got

(01:04:55):
that right all that time ago when he showed and God,
you know, touching, reaching with the fingers and everything. It
really is a symbol of being in the image of God.
That dexterity that's there. That's not really what image of
God means. Don't write me letters, I know that, but
it is the image showing the complex design that God

(01:05:19):
has made for our bodies. Not all robotics and humanoids
need to be biped, and so it's going to be
put in adopted very quickly by the automobile companies. But
Elon Musk thinks that he's got a killer app for robots.
He thinks that his robots will be able to follow
criminals around to make sure that they never offend anybody again.

(01:05:42):
So he's thinking big. He's thinking, you know, we had
the war on drugs with Ronald Reagan and he really
expanded that significantly. Now I think Trump is going to
do the same thing. And they put in mandatory minimums
and things like that to lock people away for a
very long time for small amounts of marijuana. And so
they didn't have enough prisons, and so they went on

(01:06:03):
this big prison built building, binge, private prison companies and
so forth, which just fed the desire of the government
to lock up more and more people. So I guess
he's looking at this and saying, you know, well, the
prisons are a really big business. We could get rid
of prisons and I could give them a like a

(01:06:23):
parolebot or something, and so, you know, we just let
these people have the prisons like they're doing in the UK. Already,
you stab somebody, if you're an immigrant, you just let out.
There's no robot to follow you either, But we could
have a robot to follow them around make sure they
didn't do anything.

Speaker 4 (01:06:39):
And also imagine the market share you could get from
the government if you're the one that's manufacturing these gay
nagbots that were follow people around. Yeah, that's right, Oh yeah,
it seems to jaywalking.

Speaker 2 (01:06:52):
Mustn't do that. Yeah, just so I.

Speaker 3 (01:06:54):
Love the idea of everyone's going to want one of these,
and we can force prisoners to get kind of shows
what they think of everyone that buys one.

Speaker 2 (01:07:07):
And when we look at this compilation of biped robot fails,
I wonder just how effective your per robot is going
to be in terms of stopping you. The most of
these are that little short robot that's about four feet tall.
It's really dangerous. When this thing falls, it really starts

(01:07:27):
thrashing around. That's where it could really hurt people.

Speaker 3 (01:07:32):
The really dangerous thing is when they can actually stop people.

Speaker 2 (01:07:37):
Yeah, that's right. Yeah, let's hope it stays in this
level of development for quite a while here. And of
course they put this thing in in Austin. That's where
you saw it with the cowboy hat. It's going around
entertaining people there, but one fail after the other. They
love to do these roundhouse kicks and then it's down

(01:08:00):
on the ground. Yeah, the unitary bought.

Speaker 7 (01:08:06):
I said today.

Speaker 2 (01:08:12):
Yeah, well, you know, we had a clip. I don't
think we've got that anymore. The one of the Texas
cops going and harassing somebody because it's something he posted here.
We are yeah, we got it.

Speaker 7 (01:08:25):
We're here because of the comings to meet online about them.

Speaker 2 (01:08:29):
See, robots could do this job.

Speaker 7 (01:08:31):
I have a freedom of speech, so we got.

Speaker 2 (01:08:37):
Now we're just showing up to intimidate you.

Speaker 7 (01:08:39):
Says soliciting. What you're doing is basically soliciting. You understand that, right, Yeah,
it means you're not welcomed here.

Speaker 2 (01:08:49):
By Yeah. Well, you know we've had this that show
up in their uniforms, they got guns on them and
all the rest of you know, we want to talk
to you about something you said about Israel on social media.
It's like, oh really, well, you got people like Eric Smith,
who has already said, you know, so, why are you
afraid if we look at you doing something wrong? You're

(01:09:11):
saying something wrong. Why should you be afraid if we're
watching what you're saying and recording it? He said. And
of course I've got Larry Ellison, who has a big
support of Israel. He's come out and said, you're going
to be on your best behavior. That's going to be
the good thing about us doing total surveillance of everybody.
This is the mindset of these people. Eric Smitt, Larry Elson,

(01:09:34):
Elon Musk, We're going to poleish your speech, We're going
to please your conduct, you name it. So again, when
he's talking about doing the the robots for criminals, he says,
you know, we might be able to give people a
more somebody committed a crime, a more humane form of
containment a future crime, which is if you say, like

(01:09:58):
you now get a free Optimists and it's just going
to follow you around and it's going to stop you
from crime. But other than that, you get to do something,
you get to do anything. It's just going to stop
you from committing crime. That's really it. You don't have
to put people in prisons and stuff. I think, yeah, well,
you know, how do we stop the politicians leg to say,

(01:10:21):
I have a politician followed around by c THREEPO. I'm sorry, sir,
but the Constitution says an article of this and section
that that you can't do this. How do you think
that would work out with Trump and Mike Johnson and
Chuck Schumer and the rest of these people who's paying
for this? What are the ethical implications of using a
for profit robotic platform EI there as an alternative or

(01:10:42):
it's an augmentation as usual Musk was light on the
details about a jam packed prison and criminal justice system. Again,
this has all been corporate persons and mandatory mandatory minimums
that put this thing in there in the first place.
So we're going to take a quick break.

Speaker 4 (01:11:04):
And before we do, I think they might be aiming
a bit small. You know, why go for a robot?
You know, and Elon Musk is working on his neurallink.
Why doesn't he just put something in there that if
you start thinking bad thoughts and it detects and it
just shocks you, but maybe it detonates on the spot,
killing you instantly. You know, that would be good. Wrong think,
Oh you got a little bit too rowdy there with

(01:11:25):
your thoughts, So we're just going to blow your head off.
How about that?

Speaker 2 (01:11:28):
Yeah?

Speaker 4 (01:11:28):
That really save us a lot of trouble in the
long term, won't it.

Speaker 1 (01:11:32):
Well.

Speaker 2 (01:11:32):
It truly is amazing when you look at how many
companies are working on brain computer interfaces, not just Elon
Musk neuralink and very concerning MIT has just come out
with a program that basically lets them put in some
nanobots into your brain and inject them so you don't
have to have surgery. It's not nice to make it
a little bit more convenient, and that technology is there.

(01:11:54):
MIT has done some really horrific or willing and stuff.
Remember just before they rolled out the COVID scam, they
had developed a patch. They said, it feels just like
a stamp, feels a little bit rough, but you don't
feel any pain. It's a whole array of microscopic needles
that could inject a vaccine into you without you actually

(01:12:16):
having to insert a deep hypodermic needle. The needles were
so small that they would penetrate the skin, but they
wouldn't get deep enough down to be detected by the nerves.
And so that was supposed to be a feature, not
a bug. And Bill Gates was all about that. I
thought that was great, And that happened in the fall
of twenty nineteen. They came out with that. So now

(01:12:38):
MIT is out there saying, well, you know, we've got
this desire to be able to link up to people's
brains and to monitor them and to who knows. It's
not just going to be reading. They'll be writing stuff
into your brain as well. You're going to give them
read privileges. Guess what they're going to get, right, privileges
as well, like your hard disk or something. So so

(01:13:01):
how can we how can we make this happen without
having to do screw top brain surgery like Steve Martin's
a man with two brains or something, And so they're
working on that. They're working on a way to do
it with nanotech. And it really is creepy what we
see coming after one after the other. Let's take a
quick break at Travis. You got the comments so well.
I see we have a really big tip from don't

(01:13:23):
frag me boy. Thank you very bro, Thank you very much.
Appreciate that.

Speaker 4 (01:13:28):
Yes, thank you so much. Don't frag me bro. Appreciate you,
says God Christ Bless the night family. Maybe these coming
holidays be some of the most joyous ever. May your
tank overflow thank you for speaking the truth in this
realm of lies. Well, thank you very much. Don't frag
me bro, Yeah, and overflowing our tank.

Speaker 2 (01:13:45):
Thank you. And I think this year, you know, because
of what has just happened with Karen's brother, I think
it'll be a time of reflection for us to think
about how brief life is and how blessed we are
with the things that we've been given.

Speaker 4 (01:13:59):
Yes, we've got Scott Helmer. Thank you very much, Scott Helmer.
And of course Scott does music. You can find him online.
Just look up Scott Helmer Music. Check him out. He says,
perfect example of just how enslaved we are. What if
we don't want any of this tech or these so
called advancements too bad, sit down and comply. There's enough.

(01:14:21):
They don't really give you an opt in or opt
out option.

Speaker 2 (01:14:25):
That's right. This is this is not a free society anymore.
And we keep saying it over and over again. They
keep making it clear to us.

Speaker 4 (01:14:34):
We got Guard Goldsmith and of course God hosts Liberty
Conspiracy every Monday through Friday at six pm. You can
find him on Rumble and on Twitter at Guard Goldsmith.
Go check him out, he says. Oh and John Mortimer,
the author of Rumpole of the Rumpole novels, was the
attorney who defended Virgin Records when they first started. They're
being persecuted by the government over free speech.

Speaker 2 (01:14:54):
Yeah, I didn't know that. I knew he was an attorney.
I knew his name because we had audio books of that.
I remember seeing his name, mordienmar. Now that you mention it.
I didn't know his background with that. That's interesting.

Speaker 4 (01:15:06):
Molly brown Dog says a nicked ear would still show
a scar, especially this soon after the event. Don't think
it's credible.

Speaker 2 (01:15:14):
Yeah, I don't either, you know, speaking of the British
court system though, you know, when Karen and I went,
we spent about a month just kind of bumming around.
We didn't have any money. It was after we got
married and before I started work, and so we took
all of our money and we just used it to
do a vacation because I said, we're not going to
have the time to do this later. And boy was

(01:15:35):
I right. We may not have the money, but we
we aren't going to have the time to do it later.
So the kind of things that we would do is
we'd go to the free museums and we would queue
up and go to questions to the Prime Minister on Thursday,
which is always very entertaining. They have very liably debates
and at the time prime Minister was Margaret Thatcher and
she could give it out as good as she could

(01:15:56):
take it. And we had watched that somewhat on c Span.
They would cover questions the Prime Minister. But it was
cool to see it live. And we also went to
the Old Bailey, the criminal court, and you queue up
in a line and you wait a very long time,
and you don't know which trial you're going to go into.
They just randomly put you in. So even if you're

(01:16:17):
trying to follow a trial, you're not really able to
do it because if you go to this trial one day,
the next day you come up, they're just going to
randomly put you in another trial. But it was interesting
to see the proceedings, and the one that we were
in was kind of interesting. It was I forget what
the essence of the criminal case was about. But then
it moved to Malta and there was something that happened

(01:16:41):
in Malta and they said something about the CIA and
I whatever, and the judge had stopped and then they
cleared the court room. We had to leave so they
could talk about the intelligence agencies. And again it was
in Malta. I don't know if they're talking about the
Maltese Falcon or mcguffin that was there. But it was interesting,

(01:17:04):
even if it was frustrating because it's spent a lot
of time getting into the line and waiting to get
in one of these things, and then they start the
trial and we're trying to piece this thing. We're jumping
in the middle of a trial and we're trying we
don't know anything at all about this particular case. We're
trying to piece together what's really going on with it,
and then as soon as they get to the intelligence
agency's involvement, they clear the courtroom. But anyway, that's our

(01:17:26):
experience there.

Speaker 4 (01:17:30):
Well, we have one more comment that I'll answer. Just breathe.
Seventy seven says or seventy four. I lost the comment,
but they asked, where is Travis right now? I'm currently
in Texas with my wife, visiting her family, spending some
time with them.

Speaker 2 (01:17:45):
So yes, and you're gonna be back next week I.

Speaker 4 (01:17:47):
Think, Yeah, driving back this next weekend.

Speaker 2 (01:17:51):
Yeah, be good to see you.

Speaker 4 (01:17:53):
It'll be good to be back. Those are the comments
that I know. I just got some more away. Narrowgate
Ministry says AI removes the humanity and decision making. It
is not in the best interest of humanity. I see
a lot of people anytime I'm on Twitter, the first
tweet under any other tweet is always at grock. Explain

(01:18:14):
this to me at Grock. What is this is what
movie is this from? Is this real?

Speaker 2 (01:18:22):
Yeah?

Speaker 4 (01:18:22):
That's right, Come on, use your brain just a little bit.

Speaker 2 (01:18:26):
Well, yeah, what I mentioned before about this mit thing
they call it. They've got named for it. They call
it circulatronics, like circulatory system, because they inject these things
into your bloodstream in order to establish a brain link.
After they've been injected. These things they call sweds sweed

(01:18:46):
follow the natural trafficking of the immune cells the sites
of the inflammation of the brain, which plays a significant
role in many neurological diseases. And it sounds like a
spike or something, doesn't it. What could possibly go wrong?
I don't know. Supposedly going to be helpful in the
treatment of a lot of different brain disorders Alzheimer's, multiple
scrossis strokes, brains, brain tumors, and things like that. I

(01:19:09):
tell you what they have. We have such an imbalance
in terms of technology and ethics. It's just unbelievable what
we see here. We're going to take a quick break, though, folks,
and we're going to come back and we're going to
talk about a very interesting situation that came up with

(01:19:30):
the lockdown. Now the lockdown has ended, I still think
it's this is a great story to talk about. We're
going to be right back, stay with us.

Speaker 6 (01:20:00):
Why tell Alexa to add the APS radio skill and

(01:21:17):
have access to the best channels anywhere from country to blues,
classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists
for you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio dot com.

Speaker 2 (01:21:31):
Well, welcome back. And as we're talking about the welfare system,
you know, the dog that hasn'tmbarked in the media, even
in the conservative media to much of an extent, is
anybody questioning why the welfare state has grown to the
extent that it has and what did America used to
look like. This is the perfect time to talk about

(01:21:52):
alexis to Tokol and what he saw in America in
the early eighteen hundreds. That's very different from socialist France.
You said, if people see a problem, they addressed it
in their local community. It's typically done with voluntary associations
with churches and things like that. You know, there was
a woman who is a TikTok influencer, right, and she

(01:22:12):
decided that she would expose the hypocrisy of churches during
this lockdown. So she posed as a young mother who
needed baby formula and couldn't afford to pay for it,
and she was going to call the churches and ask
them to help her. And so she had in the
background the sound of a baby crying, and she recorded

(01:22:37):
the interactions with these different people, and it was kind
of surprising that most of them said no, except for
one guy, and that really went viral as a matter
of fact. So she set out to call these churches
and she did across the country and record the responses
to see if they're willing to feed a hungry baby.

(01:22:59):
And so the one guy that she contacted asked her
She asked the churches for a canister of formula, which
it costs about seventeen dollars at Walmart. One of the
churches that she called was the Heritage Hope Church of
God in Somerset, Kentucky. The only staff member listed on

(01:23:20):
the church's website was the pastor, Johnny Dunbar. He answered
the phone. Dunbar said, you know, I've said no a
thousand times. I've been scammed. I've been told every story
in the world, he said, But he said, but this time,
he said, yes. He is a great grandfather. He wanted
to know exactly what she needed. He wanted to know

(01:23:41):
the kind and the flavor that the baby wanted of formula,
And so she was going through this whole charade with him,
and then you know, she finally interrupted him and said,
this is just a test. And he said, well, I
finally did the right thing. He says, I don't always
make the right decisions. So the guy was very humble
about it as well, what are you gonna say lands.

Speaker 3 (01:24:02):
This was during the government shutdown?

Speaker 2 (01:24:04):
You said, that's right, that's right, And so you know,
she said, the government shut down, I can't afford to
buy it. Can you help me with this? Which is
exactly what I've been saying. You know, at churches used
to do this. We let the government take it over,
just as we're talking about the atrophy of our mind
with AI. That's the whole point of the welfare system

(01:24:25):
and why I talked about this. I talked about how
the welfare state actively promoted under both Republicans and Democrats.
They promoted the handout and to say, well, don't be
ashamed of this. You deserve this, and we're going to
you know, to say that it's not charity, it is entitlement.

(01:24:46):
And so they've actively pushed this and done everything they
can to take away any sense that people feel should
feel about providing for their own And yet this I
did the right to state. And he said, the world
doesn't trust the church. This is what the pastor said.
This may be the last opportunity to get it right.

(01:25:07):
I think it's the second chance, he said. And since
she put up that video of her interaction with the
guy who said yes, it went viral and his church
has gotten more than one hundred thousand dollars in donation.
I thought that was an interesting thing there too as well.
You know, if people realize that actually the church is
going to help widows and orphans, maybe that they're going

(01:25:29):
to help people, that they're actually going to give the gospel,
he's even the more important thing. I mean, we don't
even get so caught up in helping people that we
don't talk about that. And yet you know how many
times did Jesus and James warn us that, you know,
don't just say, oh, well good for you, go on
your way, be fed, and so forth, he says. And

(01:25:51):
you know, when you stand before me, I'll say to
many people, I was hungry and thirsty, and you gave
me nothing.

Speaker 3 (01:26:01):
There was another story, kind of just a funny thing
of there's this one statue of Jesus as a homeless
person on a park bench that is put up in
various cities, and there are several stories of people that
see this thing and it's a statue of a person

(01:26:21):
on laying on the bed a bench with a shroud
around them, and all you see is like the hands
and feet with the holes in them to know that
it's Jesus. And people have called the cops on the
statue of Jesus.

Speaker 2 (01:26:37):
That's right. I was in prison and you didn't visit me. Right,
that's the rest of the thing. I got picked up
for vagrancy. The foxes have holes, but not the sun
of man anyway. You know, again, this is not the
mission of the church. But if you tell people that
you're concerned about them, that you want to help them,
you know, how will they believe you about heavenly things

(01:27:00):
Jesus if they don't believe if you don't connect with
them on earthly things as well. So I think it's
not one or the other. I think it's both. The
interesting thing about this as well was the reaction of
another guy in Shreveport who turned it down, and she
mentioned the churches that turned the mother with a crying

(01:27:22):
baby in the background down. And so they said, we
don't have any formula around, darling, sorry, none, no diapers,
nothing for babies. And so this one guy in Shreveport
got really angry about it. He called this a low blow,
and he said, she has the spirit of a witch. So,

(01:27:43):
you know, like I teach these men over here, folks
want to apologize. I don't apologize to the devil. He said.
Sometimes Christians get so weak, you forget we are supposed
to rebuke evil. So when you could pretend to have
a crying baby to try to call churches to trick
people into things, you know, things like compassion and helping,

(01:28:04):
you know you're trying to trick them into that. And
I say, in the middle of feeding people, how you
gonna do your little dirty deed. You know, it's just
the spirit of a witch. It's a witch. Well again,
Jesus said, if you feed the hungry, you give drink
these people. You did it for me, and you continue.

(01:28:24):
He said, My Bible says do not allow that thing
to live. So you have to watch when you're fooling
around with God with me, right. You know, I've we've
had situations and there was a go I have that
clip here in the to have this of the woman
who's the FedEx driver. I think that doesn't sound familiar. Okay,

(01:28:49):
well I'll put that in. I'll tell that story tomorrow.
But it's just the opposite story with that. This is
a young FedEx driver. And there was a woman who
was distraught. Her husband had cancer. It's been a very
difficult holiday for her. And she said, I was really
eager to change the topic. I wished her well by
change the topic, and she drove down the road and

(01:29:10):
it started bothering her. She just went back and prayed
with her and she said, you know, we don't have
a situation where we have that kind of regret. And
I think that's very true. I've heard, you know, like
this one Pastor Johnny Dunbar said, I've said, not a
lot of people. I've had a lot of people who
tried to abuse that. And that's one of the reasons
why you want to do charity, I think with local people,

(01:29:33):
rather than having a bureaucracy and making it an entitlement program.
It's not a good thing for people if they're scamming,
if they're not working, it's a much better thing for
them to be working. But I've heard the pastors say, well,
the way he approaches it is that if somebody tells
me that they need money and they're scamming me, you know,

(01:29:57):
if I see it, I'll give them food or something
like that. But mainly he just gives him what he's got,
because he said, if they don't need it, if they're
scamming me, God will take care of it. But he
goes the worst case would be is that they really
needed it. So that's the issue. You don't want to

(01:30:21):
be caught in a situation like that. We're going to
take a quick break and we're going to come back
and we're going to talk about some of food issues
because we have in the third hour, we're going to
be drained by John Richardson of RNC store dot com
and we're going to be talking about the nutrition revolution.
So I'm going to talk about why we need to
have a revolution and nutrition before he gets on with us.

(01:30:43):
We're going to take a quick break, folks, we'll be
right back. Stay with us.

Speaker 1 (01:31:24):
revolutionary act. You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 6 (01:31:37):
Here News Now at apsradionews dot com or get the
APS Radio app and never miss another story.

Speaker 2 (01:31:46):
Well, we have and somebody mentioned it, I think earlier,
the number of ads that you hear about ozempic. Well,
they are slashing the prices of this. They're getting aggressive
on this, and there's a lot of room to slash
of prices because I didn't realize how expensive this stuff is.
It's like five hundred dollars a month, and so they're

(01:32:07):
going to cut it down to only three hundred and
fifty dollars a month. It's like a car payment used
to be. But anyway, the and you've got to inject
this stuff into your stomach once a week to boot.
Novo nor Disk is undercutting its arch rival Eli Lilly
on OBC drugs for cash pay patients, showing its willingness

(01:32:30):
to compete on prices, it tries to claw back a
larger share of the US market. Starting Monday yesterday, introductory
doses of Novo's blockbuster Wegaby and ozempic are available for
one hundred and ninety nine dollars a month, and that's
it's a come on price. They want to get you hooked, right,

(01:32:52):
These guys, they are like your corner drug dealer who
is selling entertainment drugs to get you hooked. These people
want to get you hook on this stuff as well.
So hey, you know, for the first couple of months,
we'll give it to you for two hundred dollars a month,
then for first two months of treatment, then after that
it'll jump to five hundred a month if you pay
for it yourself. Well, they're end of this situation because

(01:33:15):
you had Eli Lilly come in and kind of undercut
them a little bit on price because their price was
so high. And then Eli Lilly also went direct to consumers,
not just an ask your doctor thing, but now you
can buy it directly from them and they can make
even more money off of that. And so Novo nor

(01:33:37):
Disk or whatever was kind of late to that, and
so they're responding to Eli Lilly's competitive moves, and both
of them are saying, well, we're going to cut the
price and we're going to go direct to consumers. And
we thank President Trump for pointing out to us that
our prices were too high. They wouldn't have known it
without Trump. Again, everybody's looking for a way to suck

(01:34:01):
up to Trump. But you know, poison, really they they
should think it, because poison has never been more affordable
or more ubiquitous than Trump has made it. Poison of
every kind. They're looking at a one hundred billion dollar
market by the end of the decade. Make one hundred
billion dollars a year off this weight stuff. Because we've

(01:34:21):
got a big problem because of junk food. Now people
are spending five hundred dollars a month and in checking
themselves with hypodermic needles in the stomach because of the
junk food that we have been eating. And so that's
the real issue here. That's the dog that nobody is
really talking about.

Speaker 4 (01:34:39):
I can't wait for the government to decide that it's
more cost effective to just issue people people ozempic than
give them more in you know, EBT and SNAP benefits.
When they can add that down, this cuts down on
the amount they eat by this much. So if we
give them this much ozempic versus this much an EBT,
it works out, you know, in our favor.

Speaker 2 (01:34:58):
Yeah, that's right. Maybe they can maybink of ozempic on
the SNAP program, because you know, people are not eating
eating right, and they're eating junk food as a matter
of fact. There's an interesting article from Epic Times from
Molly Inglehart talks about the convenience culture crisis and how

(01:35:19):
second wave feminism made America sick. She said, there is
a version of my life that could have existed, and
for a long time it looked like the path that
I was on. I was a successful restauranteur, financially independent,
living a neat and polished life that most people would
label as an accomplishment. I could have stayed that woman,

(01:35:41):
a single woman with a couple of well trained pets,
a beautiful home and a gated golf course community and
a thriving business. I'd have no obligations, no interruptions, no
sticky hands tugging my shirt while I tried to answer
my email. Society would have applauded that version of me,
and they would have called it freedom. The irony is

(01:36:03):
that during that time I was feeding thousands of people
scratch food. I knew the value of real ingredients and
traditional cooking techniques, yet I did not fully understand the
deeper meaning of nourishment. And I'm not just talking about
physical nourishment. She said, But the cultural generational work that
happens when families cook and eat together, that work that

(01:36:26):
forms identity. She said, Today my life looks very different.
I have four children and a farm. Nothing about my
life is quiet or controlled. Just yesterday, my ten year
old stood next to me making jam from blueberries and blackberries.
Then we bottled homemade barbecue sauce. The younger kids ran
barefoot around us, coming in and out of the kitchen

(01:36:48):
like little barn swallows, leaving laughter, questions, and a trail
of crumbs behind. It was chaotic and perfect and slow.
Yet in the middle of the noise, I could feel
something inch, that something was right. You know. Really, this
is the way the ancient of days God really designed

(01:37:09):
the family and life, and I think he knows better,
she said. Moments like that used to be normal. Today,
however they are the exception. What has changed? How did
feeding our families become optional, inconvenient, even burdensome. How did
basic human skills become rare? The more I look back,

(01:37:30):
the more I land on a conclusion that people do
not like to talk about, she said. Women leaving the
home during the era of second wave feminism may be
one of the primary root causes of America's health crisis,
and not only our health crisis, but a long list
of problems that I won't unravel in this article. And

(01:37:50):
so she says, well, she liked first wave feminism, and
she defines first wave feminism as getting women the right
to vote, known property, and have legal protection and make
choices about their lives. He said that was essential. The
problem is is that when you take the attitude that
is represented by feminism, whatever waves you're talking about, you

(01:38:12):
can wave goodbye to the family eventually, because it is
a rebellion against the ancient order that God has established,
that every culture has understood. And so you're going to
wind up throwing out the babies with that bathwater. And
it all is coming from a war between the matriarchy

(01:38:33):
and the patriarchy. You can only have one archy. Somebody
is going to rule. And again, if you go back
to if you go back to the Bible in the
Garden of Eden, that was part of the punishment that
was meted out. You men have to work, and to
work hard. It's going to be by the sweat of

(01:38:54):
their brow, and there's going to be weeds and other
things that are going to frustrate them. Men would look
to the husband as the head because you only have
one head. You can't have two heads. There aren't anything
natural that has two heads. Somebody's ultimately got to make
the decision. Now, the way that decision is made, that's
something that Christ speaks to, and it's not to be

(01:39:17):
done in a position of lording authority over somebody. But
you can only have one head. And once you have
taken attack that feminism did that I will be the head.
God had said, your desire will be to the man
to rule over him. And so that is what we
have seen. Since then, the matriarchy has been pushing back

(01:39:39):
against the patriarchy, she said. But then in a second
wave feminine feminism, it was different, she said, it revived,
it rewired the meaning of womanhood itself. Women were told
that motherhood was optional, that homemaking was oppressive, that feeding
and caring for a family was beneath their potential. The
message was that that value existed outside of the home,

(01:40:02):
but there was no value inside the home. You see
that that next step was the next logical step, because
even with the very first one, what they were doing
was they were training people to get away from God's
plan of companionship and co working together.

Speaker 3 (01:40:22):
I think the whole first wave second wave feminism thing
is a deception to make it look like, oh, in
the past, there was this big tyrannical patriarchy and women
were just property like they are in Muslim countries, when
in fact, you know, it's the right to vote and
own property. You could own property, and if you were

(01:40:46):
the head of the household you could vote, or that
you were the one that voted. Then they're saying, oh,
but then second wave feminism said all this stuff. It's
an artificial distinction that they've created.

Speaker 2 (01:41:03):
That's right, that's right. You know, it's a fallen world,
and of course it's not. Systems are not perfect, and
there's a reason for that if you understand, if you
believe the Bible, you understand the reason for that. And
you know, I mentioned somebody said, so, what's your favorite movie?
I guess it's the one that I've been watching the most.
I was in the hospital and I talked about it,

(01:41:23):
you know, the Pride Prejudice and Janason. I like the
most recently done one because it is beautifully photographed and
beautiful music, and I like to just have it on
the back like a moving painting, and that particular one
of the story didn't come across that much. But you know,
after we watched it and came home, we looked up
the one that was done with Colin Firth, I guess,

(01:41:46):
and that one kind of hued to the storyline more.
You could discern more about what was happening with it.
But she really chafed against the idea that women needed
to get married really and to have a husband, and
that is a Threa theme that goes throughout all this stuff.
And I guess really that's the first wave feminism that

(01:42:09):
you could see there in Jane Austin. And yet, you know,
when I look at it from this perspective, that was
one of the things that I looked at and I thought,
you know, it was it was a necessity and it
was uncomfortable, but it was a necessity for people who
just like it's a necessity for you to work. Right.
You can like your work or you can hate your work.
You can like your marriageor you can hate your marriage

(01:42:29):
or whatever. But you know, these types of things that
God has given to us, there's kind of a you know,
the difficult things that we go through in life many
times they're there to help us to grow. And so
when we look at it from the perspective looking back,
it's like, wouldn't be nice if women wanted to get married. Now,
there was a story just the other day showing that

(01:42:51):
the vast majority of girls that they polled who are
seniors in high school have no interest in getting married. Ever,
look at how effective these people are at changing millennia
of civilization. Look at how effective they are to get
you to do whatever they want you to do. And
that's the amazing thing about it is how we can

(01:43:14):
be so easily brainwashed by the corporations and by the government.
When you look at their combined power of entertainment, of education,
of news, and now of social media, you look at
all of that si up. These people can push us
in any direction if we don't have a strong foundation,

(01:43:36):
and that's the key thing. So anyway, but what I
was see is that.

Speaker 3 (01:43:43):
It's you know, motherhood was optional, and homemaking is oppressive,
and caring and feeding for a family is beneath your potential.
That's all what first wave feminism was that claims is
so good.

Speaker 2 (01:43:57):
The logical conclusion, the logical progression from that first wave feminism.

Speaker 3 (01:44:01):
Well, not even that she's creating a progression to say
that before they didn't have the right to vote, or
own property or any legal protections, which is totally nonsense.
It was only ever second wave feminism.

Speaker 2 (01:44:15):
That's right, that's right. And so she said the promise
that every little girl in my generation absorbed, whether or
not anybody said it out loud or not, that you
can have at all. And she said for them, it
was really kind of a repressive requirement. It was kind
of like a legalism from the feminists who desire to

(01:44:36):
rule over you. These are their rules that you must obey.
This particular lie is not little, It is enormous. We
not only tell it to ourselves, we enforce it on
other women. We applaud exhaustion and we call it achievement.
We normalize overwhelm and we call it balance. We pretend
that the cost is invisible. The truth is, the consequences

(01:44:58):
are not just carried by women trying to be all
things to all people. The consequences of spread out across society.
We are undernourished and underfed, not only emotionally but physically.
A generation is growing up without real food, without family,
rhythm and without the biological and cultural memory that cooking

(01:45:18):
and eating together used to provide. And I like this
take that she has on it, she said. At the
very same time, women are being told that their value
was outside of the home. Industrial food companies were searching
for their next market after World War II. The food
manufacturing infrastructure was already in placed when the war ended.
Corporations needed somewhere to send those products, and so working

(01:45:41):
women with a perfect solution. Convenience food was framed as freedom.
Formula was sold as science. Frozen dinners were marketed as progress.
Cooking was recast as outdated, unnecessary, even foolish for any
woman who wanted to be taken seriously. Someone figured out

(01:46:02):
that women could be convinced that preparing food for their
families was a waste of potential, that processed food would
become the new normal, and two generations later, we see allergies,
autoimmune disorders have exploded. People don't know how to cook
simple meals. Children don't know where food comes from. Our
dependence on corporations to feed us has become so normalized

(01:46:26):
that most people don't even recognize it as dependency, and
in the process we have lost connection, ritual, rhythm, identity,
and agency. I don't see anything. I don't say this
from a place of perfections, she said. Many of our
meals come from the farm restaurant rather than my home kitchen.
We rarely sit down at the same time to eat.

(01:46:47):
I am still unwinding my own conditioning. Even small steps, however, matter.
You can grow something, You can cook one meal a week.
You can let children stir the pot even if the
mess slows everything down. Choose food from a person instead
of from a factory. Sit down together, even if only

(01:47:08):
once in a while. Perhaps the newest form of liberation
is not escaping the work of the home, but reclaiming
its meaning and getting rid of the feminist legalism of
the matriarchy. And so you know, as we look at this,
the corporations continually push to us more and more tech food.

(01:47:33):
The latest thing, of course, is going to be synthetic
milk without cows. This is an article from the Business
Standard talking about the science of lab grown milk, that is,
they said, shaking the dairy world. Starting early next year,
Israelis will find a new kind of milk on their
supermarket shelves, one made without cows. They call it Remilk,

(01:47:57):
a food tech startup, announced that it will begin selling
it's laprotdue milk made from dairy proteins through a partnership
with gad Dairies from next year. According to report from
the Times of Israel. The company claims that it's cow
free milk tastes exactly like the dairy one, except it
costs more money, and from January, two variants, a three

(01:48:20):
percent fat milk and a vanilla flavored version, will be
available under the label New Milk. Both are lactose free,
cholesterol free and made without antibiotics or hormones. They don't
say that they're anything about preservatives though, Okay, and I
guess the question is it tastes exactly like the real

(01:48:42):
dairy milk. Well, which milk are you talking about? You know,
we just we since we've moved here, we've been blessed
to be able to go to a local dairy. Now
they don't have This is not raw milk, but it
is unpasteurized, which is a key thing. You know, you
don't get the good probiotics, but at least you don't

(01:49:03):
get the fats in a suspended state. That is a
health risk and it tastes so much better. It's even
a different color. It's even cream colored as opposed to white.
But we didn't make it. They're open once a week
and sell it directly at the farm, and we didn't
make it last weekend, and so we had to pick

(01:49:25):
up some milk, and they got some milk from Walmart
and it tasted awful and it went sour right away
as a matter of fact. So I guess, you know,
if it tastes like real milk, does it taste like
the milk from Walmart or does it taste like the
milk from the dairy, because there is a huge, huge difference.
And so they said a separate Barista line for making

(01:49:51):
coffee that they'll sell the restaurants will appear within days.
They said, I don't know what's different about a Barista line.
Maybe it's cream. I don't know what lens.

Speaker 3 (01:49:58):
The answer is, it's not going to taste like either.
It's gonna be some abomination that looks like milk.

Speaker 2 (01:50:04):
Yeah, if you either a chemical test on it, you'll
find some of the same things that are in milk.
You might find some additional things and some of the
things that are in whole milk might not be there,
they might be wholly missing. They say the prices will
be similar to other milk alternatives, like soy or almond milk,
but unlike them, this is quote unquote real, the only
difference being that no cows will be involved. You know,

(01:50:26):
we don't want any of those cows.

Speaker 8 (01:50:27):
Really.

Speaker 4 (01:50:29):
The line is this is even more fake and contrived
and going out looking at an almond and saying, yeah,
I bet I could turn that into milk. I bet
I could crush that down and extract all the juice
out of it, and it'll still taste like garbage. It's
not gonna be good. It's going to be, you know,
like water with a white tint to it. But someone
can kind of trick themselves into believing it's some sort

(01:50:50):
of milk. Maybe if they're fully diluted, this is going
to be something along those lines. Probably, maybe it'll be
more creamy, maybe they'll doctor it up in some way.
This is still some contrived Frankenstein nonsense.

Speaker 2 (01:51:03):
Well, it gets even worse than that, because there's several
different companies that are doing this and they kind of
break it down in two different methods. The first one
is that they have mammary cell cultures. These are eternal
cell lines that will produce milk. In other words, you
can get milk from breast cancer cells. About eternal cell cultures,

(01:51:25):
it's like, you know the the meat stuff where they're
growing it from you know, meat cells, eternal cells there,
And I said, yeah, just call it a tumor bone
instead of a t bone, because that's basically what you're
eating is tumas. And it's not a tuma, its schwartz
the thing.

Speaker 4 (01:51:45):
Right.

Speaker 2 (01:51:45):
Then the other one is going to be precision fermentation
where they use milk ingredients and genes and microbes and
things like that, and then they blend this all together.
They have microbes that are secreting milk proteins when fed sugar.
So this is kind of the bacteria poop model, like

(01:52:11):
the aspartame. Right, So you got two different models. Or
you can have the breast cancer milk or you can
have the bacteria poop milk. Either way, I would prefer
to have the real thing.

Speaker 4 (01:52:23):
Actually, but we spoiled by our technocratic overlords. Oh boy,
they treated so well, don't they? What options?

Speaker 2 (01:52:31):
Well, they're talking about this company as one of them.
Another Israeli startup is called imagined dairy. Yeah, and they
say it's the beginning of what some people call the
post cow era. You know, I saw a clip the
other day and it was a.

Speaker 4 (01:52:48):
I guarantee Sorry to interrupt you, but I guarantee you.
No one is saying that. I guarantee you. They are some.

Speaker 2 (01:52:55):
Their marketing company say.

Speaker 4 (01:52:56):
That there's some paid accounts on Twitter that got a
very You have to some money to go. Wow, I
just got this incredible new product. It looks like it's
the future.

Speaker 1 (01:53:05):
Guys.

Speaker 2 (01:53:06):
Yeah, that's right, Yeah, that's all. You know, Gates started
this of this green grift stuff and supposedly the carbon
footprint of a factory is going to be less than
that of a cow. Give me a break. I don't
believe that for a minute. But that's their their pr stuff,
you know, prove it. But anyway, there was video that
I saw and it was this young Irish girl and

(01:53:29):
she's got YouTube account where she does natural farming, and
she had this lilting Irish accent and she said, used
to be a time when old beef was grass fed,
and when all the chickens and eggs were free range
and all this other kind of stuff. We just called
it food back then, well, lab grown milk is engineered

(01:53:50):
to be nutritionally identical to conventional milk. That's the intention.
Whether or not that is the reality, we shall see.
They said, of course, this is going to take a
lot of PR to convince people that this is what
they want to eat and that they want to pay
more for this as well.

Speaker 4 (01:54:08):
A lot of Propaganda's what they mean. Anytime a company
says PR, you can substitute the word propaganda generally and
you'll do fine. They're trying to manipulate your perception of it.
That's what this is about. PR is just the corporate
term for propaganda.

Speaker 2 (01:54:27):
So if we take this convenience food, you know that
we buy fast food at restaurants, we buy TV dinners
and all the rest of the stuff because we don't
want to take any time for making food. It's just
something that we quickly consume as fuel, and we don't
pay any attention to the quality of the fuel that's
there either. Now they're taking it to these extremes. They're

(01:54:48):
saying that Israel has taken the lead. They've got a
lot of different companies that are doing this. There. Singapore,
which is the first country to approve lab grown meat
also has added companies that are doing in the US.
It's a company called Brown Foods and they call their
product Unreal Milk. And of course the FDA has already

(01:55:09):
given them approval because again FDA stands for you are
free to do anything if your corporation pharmaceutical company. Europe
is not moving as fast because of strict food safety regulations.
Canada has also already approved re Milk's animal free proteins
for use in food manufacturing through direct consumer, though direct

(01:55:30):
consumer sales are still limited limited, so they will use
it as ingredients in food so you won't know that
you're getting it, and uh, but just selling it directly
is still not there. But we you know what about
the wisdom of the ages. You know, there was that
one woman had said, you know, when I'm in the
kitchen and I'm cooking and I'm making stuff with my children,

(01:55:52):
it just feels right, it feels ancient. Well, yeah, you
know what about the Amish. This is an article from JD.

Speaker 7 (01:55:59):
Hall.

Speaker 2 (01:55:59):
It's should your homestead adopt the Amish diet? Something is
killing us, but not the Amish. Let's figure out what
it is. Yeah, you know, the Amish for some reason,
they don't need to inject a zipic weekly into their
stomach at five hundred dollars a month. They don't have
an obesity epidemic, and they're not taking the food and

(01:56:24):
the drugs that our government says are big improvements over
the natural stuff. They said, they are by every measurable
health statistics. So of the healthiest people in America, despite
shunning nearly every convenience. And I would say because they
shun every convenience of modern medicine and of modern food,

(01:56:46):
they're healthier. They're more active, they live longer liars than
their neighbors. And the secret isn't high tech. It's high discipline.
And that's the key thing. It takes more work, but
they enjoy the words a process. And you know, work
can be a curse or it can be a blessing,
depending on your attitude. And yet we double down on

(01:57:06):
the tech. We see that this article here they're talking
about AI might help doctors to be more efficient. Well, yes,
it'd be much more efficient than doctors because doctors have
made themselves redundant. They have basically become a referral system
for the pharmaceutical companies. Give me your give me your symptoms,

(01:57:28):
and I'll look down my chart and I'll tell you
which one of the pharmaceutical drugs you should have. And
so you know that is they have basically sold the
rope the pharmaceuticals that are going to hang them. Is
the way I look at it, and I think they
have truly made themselves redundant. Reason, however, doesn't think so.

(01:57:51):
They think this is going to be great. They said.
The problem, they said, the reason that medicine and medical
care has outpaced the cost of concer humor price index
by significant percentage since two thousand. I think it's thirty
five percent here, And he said it's due to what
an economics professor called the baw Mall effect. As other

(01:58:14):
sectors become more efficient, the relative cost of slow growth
sectors like healthcare and education increases. In other words, doctors
haven't gotten faster at healing people, so the relative price
of their time climbs. I think that is one of
the most naive takes on not only inflation, but also
on the profession of medicine that I've ever seen. We

(01:58:36):
know that they're charging confiscatory prices, and we know that
inflation at least reason should understand that inflation is caused
by government printing presses and printing money. It's amazing that
they don't see that. But again it's the government, Federal
Reserve that's doing this. This is really an idiotic take.

(01:58:59):
But Reason just had another idiotic take on the vaccines.
They had an article. Okay, so we were told that
everybody that got the vaccine was going to be dead
by now who told him that? That was Alex Jones
again making the truth unbelievable. And I said when he

(01:59:19):
said that, I said, he's doing all of us at
disservice because we know that since this isn't you know,
if they were injecting people with something like, I don't know,
pick something that kills you right away, cyanide or something
like that, we die instantly, right This is a slow kill.
It is a poison, and it doesn't affect everybody in

(01:59:41):
the same way in the same timeframe. So you're not
going to see this and it's not going to kill everybody, obviously.
But Reason doesn't even bother to investigate to see how
the all caused deaths and excess mortalities have skyrocketed after
the introduction of the vaccine throughout various societ. So you
can see this in country after country after country. Instead,

(02:00:04):
they always want to cheer the corporations. They're not a
cheerleader Reason unfortunately, is not a cheerleader of liberty and
of free markets. They are a cheerleader for corporations. And
they do the same thing with self driving cars, calling
people who oppose that luddites. The reality is is that
when I look at they've lost the plot. The real

(02:00:26):
issue with self driving cars, folks, is liberty and it's
not safety. And they make the claim, which I think
is dubious, that these cars are safer than human drivers.
So but even if that were the case, as Jefferson said,
I prefer dangerous liberty to the peaceful slavery. So yeah,

(02:00:50):
we got some comments here. Before we take a break
and join have our guests join us here, trash, you
want to go through the comments for.

Speaker 4 (02:00:56):
Us, Yes, quickly, because I'll be jumping off when the
guests are. You've got Scott Helmer, and again, thank you Scott.
We really do appreciate this is what he says. The
fact we have a so called organic section of the
grocery servers, of the standard section built of the poison Franket
Foods is another example of how we are ruled over
by demons.

Speaker 2 (02:01:15):
Yeah, they just change the labels. You could say, you know,
poison area over here, and over here you have food.
This is the food sections of the organic section.

Speaker 4 (02:01:24):
Yeah, let's see what the comments we have. We've got
the real octose book says, hopefully that individual and this
is about the guy getting harassed over criticizing Israel online.
So hopefully that individual never needs to call those cops
for help. But they make notes and files containing your names.
I've just done a deep probe on what was in
my data my real name. Took me weeks to get

(02:01:45):
corrections on the data contained.

Speaker 2 (02:01:50):
Its interesting. I've always wanted to do that. Get my
FBI files and let's see what they say about me. Right,
never did. And there's another comment here from Mark you Mark,
thank you very much. It says feminism was always a
hate movement against men. I agree. See this nineteen eighteen
letter from a suffragette to a young married woman and
he's got a link there for those of you who

(02:02:10):
want to look at that. Well. I agree. I think
it was always corrupt from the very beginning. It wasn't
a good movement that went bad. It was a rebellion
that from the very beginning is I always, like I
always when I look at feminism issues, always think back
to John Knox And at the time there was a
Scottish queen as well as an English queen and had

(02:02:33):
Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth, and he wrote this essay
and he called it the Monstrous Regiment of Women. That
title really stuck with me. He wasn't talking about like
a regiment like a troops or something like that. He
was talking about the rule of women and he was
talking about them in particular. He got into a lot
of trouble. They nearly killed him for that, But it

(02:02:55):
was always think about that anyway, go ahead.

Speaker 4 (02:03:00):
They said, they make you sick and they sell you
the fix, and it's a problem reaction solution. That's how
they operate in all forms, in all areas. The real
Octo spook again, says, I guess the new scam quote
unquote is duping churches out of baby formula, diapers, et cetera.
Diabolical huh, the work of the devil. Yeah, bulldog, says David.

(02:03:21):
Try finding the ozempic CEO's name who passed out in
the White House. It's been scrubbed.

Speaker 2 (02:03:27):
I wonder for you as a consumer of his project.

Speaker 3 (02:03:30):
I'd seen that video.

Speaker 4 (02:03:31):
I didn't know he was Orsen Goal four cent gold says.
Medicine that can eat your heart and give you osteoporosis
is on sale. How nice? Yeah, it's no wonderful. You
can get it on the cheap. The poison is very affordable.
I'll make sure that you can dose yourself properly.

Speaker 2 (02:03:47):
That's right. What were you saying, Lance, I saw that video.

Speaker 3 (02:03:50):
I didn't realize he was the ozempic guy.

Speaker 2 (02:03:54):
Yeah, yeah, Saturday night. I've had a lot of fun
with that. Well, we're going to take a quick break
and we're going to kind of continue along this. I
want to get John Richardson's take on this because they
focus on a lot of natural stuff, and as does
our other sponsor, who has what was the product, Crevis
that I sent you. There's a new product that they
were talking about it. Actually it was a dead Sea

(02:04:14):
salt that's right.

Speaker 4 (02:04:16):
It is now on sale. It's the Dead Sea Salt
body scrubs. So if you're looking to xfoliate and get
your skin in a better situation, you can go to
Homestead Products dot Shop and you can get their dead
Sea Salt body scrubs. They're soothing and great for extra
dry areas on your body that need a little extra love,
like your feet and elbows. We use dead sea salt

(02:04:37):
from Israel where the mineral content is the highest, Jojoba
oil that's rich in vitamins and minerals, and pure essential
oils of lavender or orange. I'm not big on skin products.
I'm a typical guy. I don't do much with it,
but that sounds like something someone would like. So if
you've got someone that does enjoy these fancy skin products,

(02:04:58):
go to Homestead Products dot shop and check out their
dead Sea Salt body scrubs.

Speaker 2 (02:05:02):
Yes, yes, they have the Again, we're talking about convenience
products and things that are slapped together and synthetic milk
and stuff. That's the thing I like about their products.
They are very natural. They go to great links to
get innovative and natural products. Again, check them out, and
we're going to take a quick break and we're going
to be joined. We're going to swap out Travis for

(02:05:23):
John Richardson at RNC stores dot com, and we're we're
talking about the the Revolution in terms of nutrition that
people are finally waking up to. We're going to take
a quick break, folks, we'll be right back.

Speaker 1 (02:05:36):
Stay with us. You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 9 (02:07:19):
Elvis the Beagle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find
them on the Oldies channel at apsradio dot com.

Speaker 2 (02:07:29):
Welcome back and joining us now is John Richardson of
RNC store dot com. And again you can look at
the information that they have books as well as products
that will help you. They are part of the revolution
and people in terms of nutrition, you know, letting your
food become your medicine. It has been our poison for

(02:07:51):
a long time. That's what we've been talking about, this
long trend of fast food and convenient food and there's
the things that have been we've seen the explosion and
health issues with that. A lot of people are waking
up to this, John talk.

Speaker 7 (02:08:07):
They acstlualely are They absolutely are. And then an interesting
thing is that people think the food business is completely
separate than big pharma. It's completely separate than you know, uh,
than the than the financial system. But really at the
top of it all, David, it kind of all attaches.
So it's it's a game plan that, uh, you know,
when when tobacco came under fire, you know you already

(02:08:29):
know this, but maybe your audience says no. A lot
of those tobacco companies just said, Okay, let's put the
tobacco aside for a bit, let's invest in in factory food.
So factory food became the new tobacco. And they've proven
that nicotine is not addictive and you know the truth, truth,
people that know the truth know it's not, but they
made it addicted by all the additives they added to

(02:08:52):
the tobacco products. So they just brought that right over
to the big food business. I mean it really, it
really is is it's kind of like what they call
it vertical expansion. You know, they basically just went from
you know, having us addicted to tobacco products, which nicotine
is not addictive, but what they put into it. And

(02:09:12):
so they use that same strategy, David, with thousands of
chemicals that they put in our fast food and our
packaged food, to where not only are we eating gmo
in primarily gmo corn and soy in most of our foods.
It's an ingredient and eighty percent of the packaged foods,
but we're also eating these chemicals so that when you

(02:09:34):
and I were kids, you know, a snack food maybe
had five or six ingredients and the worst one with sugar,
which we know is that same exact snack food David has,
you know, thirty ingredients in it now and you know
five of them have shown to decrease our immune system
and cause cancer to be more prevalent, and the other

(02:09:55):
ten are preservatives, so you can keep on the shelf
for twelve years, I joke. But the other, you know,
the the other one is is making it addictive so
that you want to eat more of this food, so
you can't just eat one bag of chips or four cookies,
You got to eat the whole package. So that is
a plan, and it goes right. It moves right in

(02:10:17):
to the medical establishment where we're we as a public
are getting sicker and sicker. We have more disease that
is chronic and deficiency diseases than ever before in the
history of our land. And so that the poor food
goes right into the next level profits. You know, when

(02:10:38):
people get people get to be fifty and now all
of a sudden, no, you got to have disease. You
got to have something that you're going in to get
treated for. And so it just it just keeps this
circle of profit with the same people in charge. David.

Speaker 2 (02:10:50):
You know, it's kind of interesting too. You know, we
talked about the addictive nature of the junk food that
is there. They even made an ad campaign with that.
Remember when they had Burt Laar, the guy who had
been the Cowardly Lion and the nineteen thirty nine Woods
of Oz and he had that bitch you can't eat
just one, you know, one lace, but lech you ate one,
it's like, oh, got to have another one, you know,
And that is by design. They've even telling us that

(02:11:13):
they're making a joke about it. They're making fun of us.
You can't eat just one of these things? And when
are you talking about tobacco and the fact that nickotine
by itself is not addictive. It was the additives that
they put in. I thought about that for the longest time.
I thought, you know, I used to not have all
of this explosion of lung cancer and all the rest
of the stuff that they would, you know, do an

(02:11:36):
attachment to smoking. Used to not have that with tobacco.

Speaker 1 (02:11:40):
And.

Speaker 2 (02:11:41):
You know, it's such a different thing, the kind of
processed cigarettes that people get out of a cart and
versus you know, the cowboys that would roll their own tobacco.
You know, what a world of difference when you think
about all the different things that are there. Again for
the manufacturing process. You know, they'll put foaming agents and
all the rest of the stuff and a lot of
foods that they're making in order for it to be

(02:12:04):
able to be processed through their machines. And these are
things that don't have any nutritional value. And as you
point out, you know, being able to process it through
the machines, being able to have a long shelf life,
making it addictive. These are their priorities and they don't
care what the health effects are in that regard. They're
very much like the drug companies. And I think it

(02:12:24):
is interesting that the federal government combined both food and
drugs into one agency. But I say.

Speaker 7 (02:12:31):
That that's kind of just like the tobacco, the you know,
the ats, alcohol, back firearms. You know, they lump these
things that they want to control together. What is what
is alcohol? Tobacco? Fire You know, you've got to think
about it. It's like those three things should not be
combined together. But they you know, they made tobacco, you know,
because they know, you know, that's a whole other show

(02:12:54):
we could do about the value of nicotine for us.
It actually there is, you know, and you can find
it in night shade vegetables what they which they tell
you not to eat. So anybody that thinks this isn't
you know, a concerted effort to keep us under control,
to keep us slaves, to keep us sick, to keep
you know, to control us financially and physically, you just

(02:13:14):
got to they vary this lightly. And because the effort,
the you know, the efforts to teach nutritional education at
like medical schools, for example, has been thwarted for the
last you know, over one hundred years since the Flexner
Report came out in nineteen ten. That was that was
backed by the Rockefellers and the Carnegie and many of

(02:13:36):
your audience had maybe heard that before, but they don't
a lot of people don't understand the significance that prior
to the Flexner Report, doctors mds were allowed to prescribe
you know, vitamin C or exercise or eating a healthy
diet or you know, all sorts of things that mds
were allowed to do, including natural remedies for disease. And

(02:13:58):
now it kind of in the groundbreaking achievement. RFK Junior
has come out and said that now he's made it,
you know, he's put into law that medical schools must
teach nutritional education. And this is basically, you know, we
call it a revolution because I didn't know if I

(02:14:19):
ever see that in my lifetime, David, because every single doctor,
including my own father, who graduated in the nineteen fifties,
said that when he graduated, he got less that he
got about seventeen hours of nutritional education. And the mds
today currently before RFK put this into effect, get about
twenty hours. They've done the studies on a different Harvard,

(02:14:40):
Stanford and Las know, UCLA Medical School, they on average
a graduating doctor gets about seventeen hours of nutritional education.
That's changing with the new hospital of a new medical
school opened by Alice Walton in Bensenvill, Arkansas, called the
Alice Walton School of Medicine. I went and toured that

(02:15:03):
about a month ago, and you know, you would never
think in a medical school you'd see an organic farm
on the roof or tractors with them farming outside doing
organic stuff. And this the school GIST had a first
class start in June and they had forty eight students,
of which Alice Walton is paying for the first forty eight. Now,
my dad I would always say, you know, politically, I

(02:15:24):
don't agree too much with the Walton family, especially the
billionaire class, but in this instance I applaud her for
sticking her neck out to start the first medical school.
It's going to teach fifty to sixty percent nutritional education
and only you know, forty percent well, twenty percent pharmaceuticals,
and they have a twenty percent about human biology. So

(02:15:47):
it's going to be a balanced education. So this what
rf case done is quite amazing to make this role
and even David that they're going to on the MCAT
test even when you're when you're taking your MCATs, there'll
be nutritional information. So I just when spoke at an
event in Davidson College in Charlotte, I believe I've been

(02:16:11):
so many places in the last month, but it was
at Charlotte to twenty five pre med students at Davidson
College and told them about B seventeen and natural answers
to the C word. As we like to say, so
don't get that deep platform. And so it really is
we are really seeing this happen, David.

Speaker 2 (02:16:28):
That's great. Yeah, you know, I think back on this
and was it Hippocrates that said let food be your medicine?
The guy that did Yeah. And of course we had
other nuggets of ancient wisdom that we have thrown into
the garbage ban as well, like Galen said, first, do
no harm, you know, so we lost the knowledge that's
right now. The first thing they do is cause harm.

(02:16:50):
They don't focus at all on nutrition or on food.
So that is a welcome change and I do hope
that that continues as well. But what was you talk about,
you know, the Walmart eras kind of putting it on
the line and trying to go counter to the prevailing
winds to try to elevate nutrition. What was the motivation

(02:17:12):
of Rockefeller and these other people? Do you think that
like Gates, I kind of get the sense that he
just hates humanity, But there's also a profit motive in there.
You know, what was the profit motive for the Rockefeller
people in all of this as well? Well? They have
you know, involvement in the drug companies.

Speaker 7 (02:17:28):
Yeah, of course they I mean I don't mean, of course,
that people have to do the research to find us out.
But my dad's good friend, Geoward Griffin did the research
into the Carnegie and Rockefellers, and they just felt like
they weren't making enough profit off their oil. You know,
they have the monopoly on oil business, Standard oil and
you know all the other So they decided once they

(02:17:50):
started to you know, make medicines, pharmaceutical medicines out of
these petrochemical petrochemicals that shoot, if they can get the
people that were later going to be prescribing these medicines,
if they could get into where they stop them from
being tied in the natural answers, their profits would explode.

(02:18:11):
And of course, David, pharmaceutical industry is an eight trillion
dollar industry now today. Back in nineteen ten, it was
a fledgling industry. But the Carnegie of Rockefellers and Bear
and all these companies that we talked about know that
if you have a monopoly, you can just you can

(02:18:31):
print money. And so when it's enough enough, that's when
you're looking at these people. It's never enough, and because
once it gets to a certain point where they have
so much money now they just want to build control.
So now they could use those pharmaceutical profits to start
buying non medical schools, just regular schools. They would start
doing endowment funds and controlling the curriculum at regular colleges.

(02:18:55):
And so we see these left leading colleges go even
further and further. And then they started buying media companies,
and they started buying newspapers, and they started buying a
television station. So so that all of these the funny
for all this, and so it just became monopoly after
monopoly after monopoly. So as you well know, and your
audience well knows, most of these you know companies now

(02:19:17):
are controlled through this corporate you know, one world government
of black Rock, you know. And so that's that's how
it's gone over the last one hundred and ten years.
And we're only now having people wake up enough that
we're trying to move away from that. And the one
thing about health is it doesn't matter, David, if you're

(02:19:38):
a liberal, leftist liberal or right leading conservative or somewhere
in between. Everybody wants health. Everybody wants help. Maybe you know,
you can't, you can't do a law that says I'm
going to take your health and give it to unhealthy people. So,
you know, people, people want to keep their health and
they'll do anything to keep their health. So the eighty

(02:19:59):
percent of the public is now demanding root causes and
more natural answers. But if you take that into the
financial side, they can do all they want. They can say,
let me take from the rich and give to the
poor with their money, but they can't do that with
their health. So it's the one area that right now
it's exploding in people waking up and realizing. And so

(02:20:19):
the average person, even leftists right as centrists, knows now
that the day deserve health. They've known it for a
long time, but now they see a way to get it,
and that their children and their grandchildren, everybody's children and
grandchildren deserves they'd be healthy.

Speaker 2 (02:20:35):
That's right. Yeah, So the Rockefellers weren't making enough money
off of the oil business, so they decided they would
go into the snake oil business.

Speaker 7 (02:20:42):
Exactly, exactly.

Speaker 2 (02:20:44):
Yeah, it's kind of interesting too. If you go back
and look at the history of Rocket Faller, you don't
get too deep in it. But basically he paid somebody
to take his place in the Civil War, and at
the time, the only place that they knew that there
was any oil was Pennsylvania because it was like the
Beverly Hill, but from the ground came a bubbling crude.
So he went there and he started buying up other

(02:21:06):
people in a monopolistic way to corner the market there
and the only known source of oil, and people were
moving to that because they for things that they had
used turpentine from the South for that got cut off
because of the war, so they were looking at petroleum
based products to take the place. But the problem with
him was every time he thought he cornered the market

(02:21:28):
in a particular place like Pennsylvania, they would discover oil
in Texas and then he would move to try to
corner that by setting up refineries in Ohio. And then
they find oil in the Middle East. So it's like, well,
let's get into medicine. We can really corner the market
on that if we make it, and we have Annopoli
on that. It's kind of an interesting background there, But

(02:21:50):
the key thing that I think is important is the
information that people can get at R ANDC stores. That
excellent book from GEdward Griffin, A World Without Cancer. Is
a fearless person when it comes to telling people the truth.
He really doesn't care about the people who are trying
to shut down this full of information. And of course
we all lived through this and saw it firsthand with

(02:22:12):
the twenty twenty COVID scams. You can't talk about this,
You can't talk about that. A lot of people saw
that and woke up because of that kind of oppression.
You know, what are they trying to hide? But Jed
Griffin has been on this for a very long time.
Talk about the origins of his book. I've interviewed. I mean,
it's an interesting story.

Speaker 7 (02:22:32):
Yeah, it's a really neat story for my family because
it was a fishing trip that my dad and Ed
were on. My dad had treated his first patient with
leatrell and metabolk therapy very successfully. He had treated several more,
his practice starting to grow, and so he was starting
to get some letters from the three letter agencies, you know,

(02:22:53):
the California AMA or the FDA and saying, you know,
you're using an unimproved treatment and you know for the
sea word and my dad, you know, shocked about that
that a licensed medical doctor doing no harm that's actually
seen results. Could could could you know? A government agent
he'd been practicing for fifteen years. They had never involved

(02:23:15):
themselves in any decision he made with about any patient.
But now all of a sudden he was having some success.
So he and Ed were a get away fishing trip.
They had met through the John Birch Society. If you've
heard it, I know you've probably heard of the John
Birch Society. You know, Gosh, the founder used to have
meetings at my house as a kid. So my dad
and Ed were on the council together. It was rubbersity,

(02:23:36):
but they just became buddies. They you know, they laughed,
they joked, And so they went on a fishing trip
and Ed thought he was going to get to relax,
and my dad did nothing but talk about leatrill and
cancer and that we found the answer, Ed, and you
need to help me. And so Ed kept trying to
go back to fishing, but finally he gave in and
it started, you know, studying about this because he had

(02:23:59):
asked my dad, see John, who would stop who would
stop us from knowing about this natural? So who are they? John?
And so that was the mission that Ed went on
to Fine. Over the next two years he wrote about
the history about how the hunss of Northern Pakistan Ate
a lot of a magdaland and lived to be over
one hundred years old. How the Inuit eskimos, how the

(02:24:22):
the bile duct of the of the wild cariboo. All
every society that had a lot of a magdal had
zero to very little cancer. Ta Jika stand believe it
or not. Another company nobody knows about has no cancer
even to this day because they eat apricot seeds. So
Ed did all that research. But then after he got
finished with all the research about why it works, then

(02:24:44):
he got into why we don't know about it, and
that's where he said, that's the answer. That was the
more complicated, harder to understand. But once you got it,
then you finally the lights went on and you went wow.
It was all Rockefellers and the carnegiese all trying to
take a monopoly of our health, of who we are,

(02:25:05):
our bodies. Basically, they'd like to own our bodies. So
as they start us with a with a chemotherapeutic agent,
or they start us with the pharmaceutical, they just add more.
Everybody watching it's on one, you're on a blood pressure medicine.
Now you have to be on a you know something
to help with your potency. Right now you have to
be something to help with your lung capacity. And now

(02:25:27):
you have to be something to help you from having diabetes.
These are all drugs that keep us in that roller coaster.
So my dad, so Ed wrote that book. But he
was the first one ever trying David that he was
the first one ever that said that the connection between
big money, the you know, the the the pharmaceut on

(02:25:48):
either side, the pharmaceutical medical industrial complex, and the financial system,
the Federal Reserve was connected, very well connected. It wasn't
two separate things. Everybody else always I remember, back when
I was younger, a lot of conservatives believe that the
pharmaceutical companies were great. Ronald Reagan signed the document in

(02:26:09):
nineteen eighty six to make it so you could never
sue of pharmaceutical companies because they can plan. They would
never be able to make a profit on these vaccines
if they couldn't have you know, they couldn't have legal shield.
Never before had that been given to any industry in
the history of America. But Ronald Reagan, that conservative, signed
that into law, ensuring that we'd have a generation of
sick people.

Speaker 2 (02:26:29):
But I still see that. Excuse me for interrupting, I
still see that. With the libertarians, for example, Reason magazine,
they were mocking the idea that the COVID shots were
dangerous for people. It truly is a blind spot that
many people on the right have about this and have
had about it. But I think it's a key thing,
you know, when you look at the fact that no,

(02:26:50):
you can't talk about this particular treatment for a particular disease, right,
And we saw that in spades with COVID, with that
other sea word that we can't talk about, right, No, no, no,
you can't try. Somebody over here says that they're having
success with a droxychloroquin or with ivermectin or something. No, no, no,
you can't try that. And it's like, well, if you're
telling me that this is some major pandemic that we're

(02:27:13):
all going to die, and you're telling me that you're
not going to try something that has been used for
a very long time in an off label use, which
they constantly do with everything else. When the government approves
a drug, it now can be used, and you know
they approve it for this particular condition. Well, if it's
approved for that particular condition. A doctor can prescribe it

(02:27:34):
for a different condition, and that's called off label use.
You know, it's interesting. I've got a friend who's doing
a documentary right now about the FDA and drug approvals
and things like that. He went to Japan to talk
to people there about it, because in Japan they have
a situation if you can show that it's got a
history of use, that it's not harmful to somebody, you're

(02:27:55):
allowed without any attacks from the government. You're allowed to
run your own test on it as long as it's
not harmful. As long as you're not doing any harm
to anybody, you can run a test on it and
you can say, okay, so we're trying to see if
it helps with this particular condition, and you have to
prove that based on your test. But they won't shut

(02:28:16):
it down. And that's what our government does. And that
ought to be the smoking gun to tell people something
is not right here. And I think that's a key
thing that opened up a lot of people's minds to
all of this about lay a trill and about other
things like that. And it is a natural substance. It's
apricot seeds. I mean, you can't deny that people can

(02:28:37):
get a natural substance like that.

Speaker 7 (02:28:40):
Yeah, that's That's exactly what's happened, David, is that the
FDA has not become an organization that approves anything that
doesn't have cause harm. They're only in the business of
proving things that can be financially benefited from. That's a
fact they don't, right, They don't approve natural substances. They
just don't.

Speaker 2 (02:28:58):
They don't.

Speaker 7 (02:28:58):
They're not in that business. So unless it's manufacturing the
lab and has a patent on it, and you can
afford to pay the multi millions of dollars for the studies,
then that's the only way you can get a drug
or a substance passed to the FDA. So it's been
since nineteen fifty eight since any natural substances have been

(02:29:18):
approved by quote unquote proved by the FDA. And they've
stopped doing that long since. And even if it wasn't
a policy that they said, well, you know, because people
always say why hasn't leatrell been studied by the FDA?
Every single time it was proven in animals at Loyal University,
at Houston Methodist, at at even Sloan Kettering. They proved

(02:29:40):
with the famous account of mets with Sigora that Leatroll
stopped in metast season tumors and laboratory rats. And he
suggested they need to do a human trial, and they were.
They actually even found a hospital in Mexico to do
the human trial. Well, then when the pharmaceuticals companies came in,
literally into Sloan Kettering and said, shut this down. Shut

(02:30:00):
Kenna matsud down. I don't care if he's been it,
Sloan Cantering for sixty years, and he was the inventor
of chemotherapy, and he said, quote unquote David that Landtrill
B seventeen was the most effective chemotherapeutic agent he'd ever tested. It,
Sloane Cattering. And when it was all said and done,
they lied about it, covered it up, and millions of

(02:30:21):
people died, David, and he made a movie about it.
But still the general public doesn't know. That's how very
powerful this trillion dollar, multi trillion dollar pharmaceutical industry is.
And for anybody that thinks they won't shut something down
for profit, you just need to look at anything natural.
Linus Pauling. We have documents from Linus Pauling showing that

(02:30:42):
he wanted to see what defects of vitamin see the
famous doctor who discovered vitamin C was great for colds
and things like that. He said it could also be
helpful to prevent cancer, especially in combination. Would be seventeen.
We found a letter in the vault that you and
I have talked about that says that was written to
Ralph Moss, who was the whistle blower. It's long cattering,
and said that what the National Cancer Society, what these

(02:31:06):
American Cancer Society groups have done, will go down in
history as being evil and should be should be you know,
stopped completely. And then we have an actual letter from
from Lion's Pauling to Ralph Moss, the whistleblower at Lone Kettering,
showing how it's not just you know, lantroll that they've
pushed aside, it's other natural substances like vitamin D during

(02:31:31):
the COVID scamp or actually my assistant gave me the letter.
Here's the letter from from Linus Pauling to Ralph Moss.

Speaker 2 (02:31:38):
If you don't mind, yeah, I want to read, please
do Yeah.

Speaker 7 (02:31:42):
He said, the revelations in this book, about the ways
this book the doctor results, how they covered up the
suppression of latrol at Sloan Kettering Institute for Cancer Research.
This is written by Ralph Moss, pH d. He said,
the revelations in this book about the ways in which
the American people have been betrayed by the cancer establishment,

(02:32:03):
the medical profession, and the government are shocking. Everyone should
know that the war on cancer is largely a fraud
and that the National Cancer Institute and American Cancer Society
are derelict and their duties to the people who support
them amazing and Lioness Pauling signed by Lions Pauling to
Ralph Moss, the whistleblower who Liones Pauling was a famous

(02:32:26):
he was he was a left leading politically. My dad
didn't agree with the politically, but as far as nutritionally,
they agreed that vitamin C is a is an absolutely
great vitamin in the war against cancer, and Liones Paullin
wanted to prove that and he couldn't get funding from
any government agent to do that, and so he was
on our team. But only you wouldn't know about that

(02:32:48):
if you listen to mass media or you know, the
mainstream media as we call it, which I don't even
like to.

Speaker 2 (02:32:55):
Say anymore, right, yeah, and Linus Pauling was all about
vitamin C. He wanted Tobel Prize, what was the Nobel
Prize for the vitamin C.

Speaker 7 (02:33:03):
He showed that the amazing uh, you know, nutritional benefits
of vitamin C. He was a big proponent of that,
and he showed how it could be used in many
different diseases as the preventative. But the more he got
into the ones that were so profitable. You know, everybody
knows if you're getting a cold, you start to fill sniffles,
take some vitamin C. That's because of Lions Pauling. But

(02:33:25):
when it started to get into you wanted to study
it in the cancer realm. That's what he got pushback.
He got absolutely zero funding from the you know, national
the American Cancer Society, or the National Cancer Institute or
any government agencies for funding for study of vitam C.
This is the famous you know doctor Lions Pauling who

(02:33:46):
was left leaving by the way, and still he was
shut down because you don't want to take away the profits.
And this this is case after case after case. You know,
we know, for example that type two diabetes doc mds
are out there right now David wiping out type two
diabetes with nutrition and getting people off sugar. But it's
an eighty eight billion with a B dollar industry for

(02:34:10):
the drugs to treat type two diabetes, which mds are
coming on saying that will never cure type type two diabetes.
And that's why they don't want these doctors telling their
patients that it's the proper diet, a vegetable or a
fruit based diet, natural diet with getting off of sugar.

(02:34:31):
Can absolutely basically I could say the word cure, but
I hate to I hesitate to use that it basically
wipes out type two diabetes and so many other things.
And you know, I was just recently at a conference
with seven hundred medical doctors called the Plan Trition Project,
and these are all mds that have woken up to
the fact that a plant based diet. I even have

(02:34:53):
the catalog from heir of all these, so it looks
so medical. But they accepted me as a brother because
I was talking about out that twelve hundred different foods
that Lanferm comes in. These doctors were talking about, if
you just get people eating the proper food, it's a
plant based eighty percent of the time fruits and vegetables

(02:35:13):
they had, the pharmaceutical things or whatever. The standard treatments
these doctors have work so much better. And David, it
was like sitting in the aiace, I was out. My
mind was blowing that I was hearing these doctors say that,
who for years have been trained that no health and
nutrition has nothing to do excuse me, nutrition and what

(02:35:33):
you eat has nothing to do with your help.

Speaker 2 (02:35:35):
Yeah, and I experienced that first in when I was
in the hospital. You know, you look at the meals
that you have. Obviously they're not interested in nutrition. But
also I said to them, I thought, you know, while
I'm here getting all these ivs, I say, can I
get a vitamin C IV? You know what would I
have to do to get you guys to do that? Oh,
we wouldn't do that. We don't do that. It's like, really,

(02:35:56):
you know, why not? And he well, you can take
a vitamin C. You can take that as a pill.
We don't do that as an IV. And it's like,
well it's more effective as an IV, but still okay,
So I'll take the vitamin C pill. No, we don't
give you vitamin C pills either. We'll give you we
got a whole list of things that we will give you.
As you pointed out, each of them has got their
adverse effects, which is a cascading things like Domino's. Okay,

(02:36:18):
so now you know we're going to address this particular thing,
but now we're going to cause two other problems over
here that we can then prescribe drugs for you, and
then those will cause two more problems out there. But yeah,
I was just talking about ozempic and the price war
that's going on now between the Eli Lilly and Novo
Nordisk and how they are it's going to be one

(02:36:40):
hundred billion dollar industry in just a couple of years.
The price that we pay for not having discipline in
the food that we eat and for going with junk
food and convenient food and processed food. This is so
now people are paying like five hundred dollars a month
and sticking a needle in their stif like once a week.

(02:37:01):
It's amazing.

Speaker 7 (02:37:02):
Yeah, and then unfortunately that is just another SiO that
is all. The entire science behind how ozepic works is
basically causing your stomach not to digest food so it
stays rotting in your stomach and so the lawsuits that
are going to be going towards those those pharmaceutical companies

(02:37:23):
are talking about hundreds of millions of dollars because the
science behind how is if it works, it basically paralyzes
your testinal tract and you're basically losing as much muscle
loss as you are as fat loss, and you're making
yourself un healthy, and it's causing colon cancers or it's
increasing the rate of colon cancers. It's calling causing all

(02:37:45):
sorts of problems. And the country that I believe it's
I can't remember the name of the country. The country
that produces ozepic is actually made illegal for them to
sell it to their own population. But America is trying
to vote it in to give it to our beast kids.
We created fifty percent of b s EVE with our kids,
and now we're trying to prescribe it to our best kids.

(02:38:08):
And President Trump says, hey, let's make it go down
from thirteen hundred dollars to fifty dollars. And again, you know,
I agree with President Trump a lot of things, but
he and medical advice I just wouldn't go with because.

Speaker 2 (02:38:24):
Included in the SNAP program, you think.

Speaker 7 (02:38:29):
I would be I wouldn't be surprised. But there's good
news that like Oklahoma made it, you know, so you
could doctors mgs can prescribe or dant food to their
obese patients and get it covered by insurance. So Oklahoma
just recently did that. We have some wins. It was
Denmark was the country that makes o zempic that it
makes it illegal to sell to their population because they

(02:38:52):
know it's damaging and harmful. But of course it was
the United States. We're we're we buy seventy to ninety
percent of the pharmaceutical drugs that are producer in the
world and paid for and we're sicker than ever, and
so that has to change. And I believe rfk Jr.
I'm not the guy that says just believing the guy

(02:39:13):
at the top that he's going to solve our problems.
I believe he's making a difference. But more importantly, and
this is a text or a tweet or whatever you
call it now an X that Kelli means are you
familiar with CALLI means no, no. But he works right
hand kind of man of RFK JR. And I've met
him several times. I know about him a lot of

(02:39:35):
people suspected that he might be a plant, but I
know him as a real person. His sister gave up
her medical career at Stamford to tell the truth about
the fact that all we know how to do is cut, burn,
and poison. So but CALLI said this on a recent
phone call, on a zoom call that we have weekly,
He said, I recently had a conversation with a friend

(02:39:56):
who runs a clinic network of one thousand mds, She said,
and the main conversation among doctors is frustration that patients
are asking about the root cause and more natural cures.
Imagine if the doctor's being frustrated for their conditions, she said.
Zero percent of patients asked these questions five years ago
at the start of COVID, and now eighty percent of

(02:40:19):
patients due. So that's the thing that gives me, David
the most excitement about what's going on, because I really
don't almost care what happens at the top anymore, because
whatever ruling they make, I'm gonna do was best for
me and my family, believe it or not. Lots of
people like me and you out there that aren't gonna
just wait for the newest politician to change to ruin

(02:40:40):
our lives by voting something that we don't believe in.
You know, we're not gonna do it. But now, instead
of in the past, when I was growing up, I
was always the five percent because I was a part
of the part of the John Birch society that knew
about communism. I knew about these evil things were going on,
knew about this stuff. I knew about what was going
on Hollywood. So I was always is the minority. Now

(02:41:01):
it feels like everybody's you know, everybody's on my team
what I'm out and about, And I'm not just talking
about in my little clicks. I'm talking about when I'm
traveling across the country and meeting with people that would
have doctors that would have kicked me out of their
office five years ago. Now are friends now consider me
a friend and a co patriot and someone to talk
to about advice about the patient. I'm getting emails and

(02:41:24):
texts from mds that would have never ever listened to
the story of B seventeen and the prevention and treatment
of the C word. Five years ago. They would never
listen to him, David. Now the general population is listening
and it's a groundswell and it's growing every day.

Speaker 2 (02:41:41):
And that's, you know, a silver lining to that cloud
of what happened with the COVID scam. It was so open,
so in your face, so obvious that people wait a
minute and then they start saying, I remember, and I've
played it many times. A clip of a woman who
breaks down in tears as she's talking about the fact said,
when they start to talking about sudden adult death syndrome

(02:42:03):
after these vaccinations, she said, I suddenly realized that I
killed my own child sudden infant death syndrome, And yet
she didn't. It was the medical community that lied to her,
that did that to her. But again, it was a
wake up moment. It was an aha. And people are
seeing this across the board. It's not just well sids,
it's like sads, but it's just, you know, we're seeing

(02:42:27):
this kind of corruption. It's open, it's in your face.
It's like what we saw with education when parents couldn't
believe the things that they were told that were happening
in their own classroom, where they would believe, well, yeah,
but it's not in my classroom. I've met the teacher
and she's nice and then they saw the telecommunication out
of the classrooms that woke them up. They realized it
was there. And the same thing is happening now with

(02:42:49):
the FDA and with the medical community in general, and
especially for the pharmaceutical companies. So that has been a
real silver lining in all of this stuff, I think.
But the real silver lining, I think is what you
have there at the RC store. You've got both information
as well as products that are going to get people
out of this this this food culture that we're in

(02:43:14):
here for profit for the big corporations.

Speaker 7 (02:43:17):
Yeah, it's well, you know, as Jerra Griffin says, and
a local doctor right here named doctor John Murphy, m D.
And other people, my family and people have talked to
anybody that regularly eats magdaland in your food or your
change your diet is found in twelve hundred different foods,
but anybody that regularly eats it does not get the

(02:43:38):
sea word. And Ed Griffins ninety four as a Friday
and I called him wished them happy birthday, and he
still doesn't know anybody that regularly eats Maydaland or no,
or does his past his wife Pat whoever has come
down and died with cancer. Now that doesn't mean I
like I always make sure I say that if someone
has stage four cancer, they've done chemo and radiation and surgery.

(02:44:01):
Those people have been had their immune systems destroyed. And
even though Harold Manor at Loyal University said that he
got one hundred percent positive results even with those people
in improving their lifestyle, because that's the big thing at
that point, David, when you're at the end of life,
you want to be able to eat, you want to
be able to feel no pain, you want to be
able to do that. Even though those people still responded,

(02:44:22):
many of them died not necessarily of the sea word.
That's the big thing. They don't necessarily die of the
sea word. They die of the radiation where they've actually
baked their liver, where they've died of these chemotherapeutic agents,
or they've cut so many organs out of their body
their body doesn't have a chance to survive. And so
that's the key information. The mechanics of how A magdaland

(02:44:45):
B seventeen works. Doctor John Murphy, the MD that I
think I've mentioned on your show before, who's local here,
who's been doing using it for twenty five years, a
metabolic treatment along with B seventeen and amignalant vitamin C
d ozone. He's had a twenty five year track record
and say he doesn't have any patients that have regularly

(02:45:06):
taken a magdalan that have ever died of cancer. And
so that's a big statement, and that gets me deleted
off a YouTube or this channel or that channel, or
TikTok just took away my channel. But we are winning
the battle and the hearts and minds of people, because
once people understand that cancer is a metabolic deficiency disease,
it's not something. It's not something even that that shot

(02:45:28):
causes that shot. What that shot does is destroys your
immune system, or the five G affects your immune system,
or eating too much of this poisonous food affect your
immune system, and that allows the cancer. And the absence
of the B seventeen, the amygdalin, and the absence of
the pancratic enzymes you need, the absence of the proper
nutrition you need. Your body develops cancer. It's not something

(02:45:51):
you catch and that's one of the hardest messages, but
mbs are now accepting it. I don't know if you
know doctor Margaret Aranda, a new dear friend who fought
this battle with COVID. She's a she's ah, she she
does you know when people go into surgery. Gosh, but
any anyway, I slip my mind. She's world famous doctor.

(02:46:13):
Margaret Randa has now joined the battle with us and
helping us tell the story of leatroll and the studies
and and absolutely uh debunking the stories that said that
latroll didn't work or that it was poisonous or things
like that by by using a scientific proof. So it's
a it's an amazing time. And yes, people can get
that information at RG store dot com, or they can

(02:46:35):
go to OWWC dot org which stands for Operational World
Without Cancer dot org, and they can get the free book,
the free digital download of Ed Griffin's seminal book World
Without Cancer, which we will we can't have, David, We
really can't have. They can get that book, or they
can find a practitioner that's using B seventeen as an

(02:46:56):
adjunctive therapy in their in their medical practice or their
they're practice to get people healthy, but by improving their
immune system and allowing their immune system to fight off
the cancer, not see r e the cancer because if
you say that, that's when the three letter agencies don't
like you, because they say the only thing that can

(02:47:17):
cure cancer is chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery, and we know
we know from history to those simply only work about
six percent of the time over a five year period.

Speaker 2 (02:47:28):
And of course that's the same kind of there's an
analogy there to the COVID stuff as well. We see
people come in and they diagnose them with the respiratory
disease that put them on a ventilator and kill about
ninety percent of the people, or they give them rim
does of air and destroyed there was the deliver I
think also type of the kidney. Yeah, so you know,
it's the same type of thing that we see. And

(02:47:48):
we also see analogies in terms of vitamin C deficiency
giving people scurvy, or you can pick a lot of
other things. If you've got deficiency and potassium and magnesium
or this or that body is going to get sick,
it's going to be vulnerable to disease, or the deficiency
itself will cause a disease. So it's not unusual for
people to this understanding that it really is about nutrition

(02:48:13):
and giving your body the tools that it needs because
God has made it very resilient. And that's a different understanding. Again.
Part of what they have sold us, besides just the drugs,
is that disease is something that we've got to search
out and kill and it doesn't really matter what happens
to your body in terms of the secondary effects that
are there. And so we really got to change that

(02:48:36):
false paradigm that has been pushed on us by the
Rockefellers and so forth, and all of this, I think
it just stands to reason, and I think people have
now lived through an obvious and extreme version of what
these people have been very subtly and secretly doing for
a century or so. And now through this COVID since

(02:49:00):
the other c word, we have lived through this process
and we see all of their tricks. It's kind of
like the magician and you're seeing what's in the box
when he saw as the lady in half, and you
can't unsee that anymore. The illusion has been broken for
a lot of people.

Speaker 7 (02:49:16):
I think the Wizard of Oz so right seeing behind
the curtain, and so many people have seen that, David,
and it's like I said, that's the great news even
though you and I wake up every morning and we
look at the news and we go, oh my gosh,
what's the next horrible things happening. The good news from
COVID is that the average person, the uptake of these

(02:49:38):
COVID vaccines are less than five percent. People just aren't
getting anymore. And the studies are coming out, the studies
from South South Korea and from Italy, and the studies
about sundy infant death syndrome. It's an interesting study they
did during the COVID period when people couldn't go to

(02:49:59):
the hospital get the vaccines. They couldn't go in, they
were refused. You know, the parents were having babies and
then we're not allowed to go back for their well
baby checks. Sudden infinite syndrome plunged to an all time
low over that period of time, and people are like, wow,
what was that about it? I mean, was it because
people were staying home with their kids. No, it's because
they weren't getting these vaccines that were causing sudden infandes syndrome.

(02:50:21):
So the South Korea study showed I think it was
seven I was a huge number of people and every
single type of cancer and every single type of disease
was going up precipitously. So we now have this proof,
and they're still going to push it, David. They're still gonna,
you know, the findser presence, still going to talk about
an mRNA vaccine for cancer. But now that your audience

(02:50:43):
knows they're never going to find a vaccine for a
deficiency disease, is preposterous as saying, can we find a
vaccine for thirst? How about a vaccine for survey? How
about a vaccine for pernicious anemia that's a B twelve
deficiency cyano kabalomy. And that little known fact is that
B seventeen or a magdaland is a precursor in your

(02:51:05):
body to manufacture B twelve. So it also helps on
a higher level with anybody with pernicious anemia. As I've
stated before, David, this might be a shock to hear,
but we've got documentation from doctor Dean Burke that the
founder of the National Cancer Institute, that they did studies

(02:51:26):
at the National Cancer Institute that Amigdalan gets rid of
sickle cell anemia. And why don't we know about that? Well,
sickle cell anemia is a one hundred billion dollars a
year in pharmaceutical drugs are used to treat people primarily
Blacks and Mexicans with the disease of single cell anemia,

(02:51:49):
and it just you know, maybe takes away pain. But
these people still live ten years less than their family
members or their contemporaries, but they make a one hundred
billion dollars a year. So if a natural substance like
a mingland was shown by the National Cancer to Institute
in the nineteen seventies to be able to treat and

(02:52:09):
ameliorate simple celenemia actually from live blood scans, that's why
doctor Deanberg beyond just cycle celenemia, also because of cancer
and also because of his stance on florid, had little
known to people know that doctor Dean Burke came out
and told the world that florid had increased the Florida

(02:52:30):
was increasing cancer and showing less intelligence and kids. He
was doing the studies in the seventies, and so they
pushed him out and so nineteen seventy four, doctor Dean Burke,
who founded the National Cancer Institute was the head of cytochemistry,
resigned in nineteen seventy four in the middle of the
period that I call the leatro wars or the health

(02:52:52):
freedom wares in the middle of that period. It so
much happened in the seventies that we've talked about. But
it just goes to show you it hasn't just it's
not just been the last ten years, David. It's been
the last fifty years. They've been covering up natural answers
and even the people working for the government couldn't get
that message out because of the financial the side that

(02:53:13):
had so much money to go up against everything that
a little apricot se or the little nutrient like vitamin
C or vitamin D, any of these naturally occurring things
you can get vitam deep in the sun. Yeah, it
was cheap effective and no way big pharma wanted any
of these things to ever come out.

Speaker 2 (02:53:30):
And you know what you're talking about, the wars and
the amygdalen wars and things like that. Again, we haven't
talked about this with you on this program. They're big
pr victory. I think, you know, when I go back
and look at it, boy, they really hammered it. That's
the first place that I heard about it was with
Steve McQueen address that what happened with Steve mcgon was
he another one of these cases of where he had

(02:53:51):
tried so many things that he had severe injuries to
his body before he even got to this point.

Speaker 7 (02:53:57):
No, and I have so much doc imitation about this, David,
that might shock your audience. But Steve McQueen left the
United States where they were only wanted to do chemotherapy radiation.
All of his twenty doctors were telling me, you got
to cut burn poison. And he went to Mexico to
and was treated with metabolg therapy and leatrom and his doctor,

(02:54:19):
doctor Rodriguo Rodriguez, and Mexico said they had gotten rid
of the cancer. He had no signs of cancer. And
his doctor here in America was doctor Donnelly. But we
have a book. It's called The One Answer to Cancer.
And when we discovered it in the vault, we had
never seen it before, and we said we looked on Amazon.
They were selling it for three thousand dollars a copy.

(02:54:40):
I believe it or not, doctor Donnelly says in the book,
he says this, this is not John Richardson that Steve
McQueen had wiped out his cancer. Was he was shown
to be no signs of cancer, but he still had
this dead tumor in his in his kind of his belly,
over his liver, and so Steve McQueen, being an actor,

(02:55:01):
didn't want this to stay there. He didn't want to
wait for it to be reassimilated his body. So they
opened it up and cut it out and it fell
out on the table. Wasn't connected anything. It was just
a necrotic dead tumor that fell out of his body.
And he reported to doctor Donnelly that he felt great.
Everything was good, and he said, I am going to
go full more after the medical industrial complex. I'm going

(02:55:23):
to go after big Pharma. I'm going to go after
the cancer industry. Doubt his doctor, in his own words,
said that his phone was constantly tapped by the Three
letter agencies, and the next day Steve McQueen, he said,
doctor Donelly said that someone snuck into his room gave
him a blood thickener, something that caused his blood to thicken,

(02:55:47):
and that caused him to have a stroke and he
died even though he had no more cancer. And that
next that day, over three thousand news outlets reported that
Steve McQueen had died from choosing to do Leatrill instead
of doing Uh, you know oncology, normal oncology, chemot therapy,

(02:56:07):
raised in surgery. David, we see that.

Speaker 2 (02:56:10):
I mean that amazing story. But yeah, you know that's
the other thing too. We've seen this happen so many
times from the government and people in power that.

Speaker 8 (02:56:20):
Absolutely it's not surprising to those of us that know this,
just like Larry McDonald, Congressman Larry McDonald and Christian MD,
who used leatrill, who introduced laws into legislation about leatroll
making it available to every catch occasion.

Speaker 7 (02:56:38):
He was murdered in Flight Double seven in Korea and
it was one of my dad's best friends. That's the
only time I've ever seen my dad cry. Now, people call,
come on, they're not going to kill one doctor. Oh
they're they're not. They're not over billions of dollars. The
most powerful guy in the in the l latroll of war.
Uh if stem a Queen wasn't a powerful thing, millions

(02:57:02):
of people believed after Steve McQueen. You said, that's how
you first heard about it. Those people know Steve McQueen
because they say, oh, he died because he chose latroll.
The opposite, he died because he chose leatroll after the fact,
because he was going to go after the medical industrial complex.
My dad, doctor Dean Burke, the head, the founder of

(02:57:24):
the National Cancer Institute, doctor Harold Manner, who proved beyond
a shadow of a doubt that breast cancer should be
a thing of the past with leotroll, pancretic enzymes, and
vitamin A. All three of these amazing doctors all died
within sixty days of each other in nineteen eighty eight.
At that point, David, anybody that was practicing, and there's

(02:57:44):
thousands of doctors that were using leatroll and in the
practice just as an adjunctive therapy. They had to go underground.
They had they had to go silent, you know. They
were like, wait a minute. So some doctors continue to
do it, and some doctors picked it up and continued
throughout this. But now we're finding that now that people
see the truth, these doctors are braver than ever. They're

(02:58:05):
coming out. I'm talking to MD's every day and understand
that the history of this and so we have had
the cycle. But a lot of doctors, a lot of
brave doctors gave up their careers. Doctor Privtero went to
jail and they could never find a patient, never once
find a patient even in a letter. McDonald's case. They
sued him in Georgia, but the patients that one of

(02:58:28):
the pasts he treated ended up dying of the effects
of chemo radiation. And they originally talked his son into
suing Elery McDonald, but the son said no, I can't,
I can give up, and Larry McDonald, you know, said fine, man.
They still went forward with the case and Larry McDonald
won that case before he was before he was murdered
in that in that plane flight double O seven. So

(02:58:49):
so much of this David has is people. It's just
hard for people to believe. But we have the actual
documentation of it that the three letter agencies did not
want me to be chared with people, and so at
that point I always have people say, well, John, make
sure you're getting that out there. So we're doing everything
and our powered it to scan these documents and get

(02:59:09):
them out there and get them uploaded, because the Wayback
Machine proves that they'll lie about anything, including Steve McQueen,
baseball players that have played for the Los Angeles Dodgers,
Brett Butler, who used leant turtle to get back on
the baseball field in nineteen ninety nine. They lied about it.
If you google it, it says he just did chemo radiation,

(02:59:30):
and no he didn't. And he lives here still in Arizona.
So they, you know, they'll stoop to know they have
no problem stooping to the lowest point ever or doing
anything to stop something that will destroy a multi billion
dollar industry. And we're getting the word out there because
once people get in the brain, it can never be
taken way.

Speaker 2 (02:59:50):
Absolutely, That's why it is so important what you do.
Thank you so much for coming on John, and again
rncstore dot com. It is a wealth of information, just
as you heard from John. I mean he knows this
stuff because he's read the books that he's got there.
You can educate yourself like that as well. But not
only that, you can help yourself and your family with
the products that he's got there. You can get ten
percent off of the code night. But I'm proud to

(03:00:13):
be associated with you, John. I really do appreciate what
you're doing. Thank you so much.

Speaker 7 (03:00:18):
Right back at you, David. I always enjoy being on
your show. You're a great American.

Speaker 2 (03:00:22):
Thank you. Thank you folks for joining us have a
good day. The common man. They created common Core, dumbed
down our children. They created common past, track and control us.

(03:00:45):
Their comments project to make sure the commoners own nothing
and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,
a sophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity.
Create it in the image of God. That is what
we have in common. That is what they want to

(03:01:07):
take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us, while they hide
everything from us. It's time to turn that around and
expose what they want to hide. Please share the information
and links you'll find at the Davidknightshow dot com. Thank

(03:01:29):
you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't
support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidknightshow
dot com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Ruthie's Table 4

Dateline NBC

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Tue Episode #2140: The “Assassination” Attempt: Trump, Tucker & Deep-State Theater

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Ruthie's Table 4

Dateline NBC

All Episodes

Tue Episode #2140: The “Assassination” Attempt: Trump, Tucker & Deep-State Theater

Stuff You Should Know