Wed Episode #2132: Michael Burry vs. the Machine: The Billion-Dollar Bet

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:27):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.

Speaker 2 (01:03):
As the clock strikes thirteen, here we are in the
fifth of November, here of our Lord twenty twenty five. Well,
we're going to talk about the elections and what is
likely to change, what did the elections tell us about
what is coming up in terms of politics. But we're
also going to take a look at what affects us individually,

(01:23):
the bubbles that are out there. We have a very
interesting move by the guy that the big short was
based on his story, the guy who sussed out what
was happening two thousand and seven and eight. He's now
calling for a big short on the big bubble.

Speaker 3 (01:40):
Stay with us, will be right back.

Speaker 4 (02:07):
I thought we could mark this November the fifth, a
day that is sadly no longer remembered, by taking some
time out of our daily lives to sit down and.

Speaker 5 (02:16):
Have a little chat.

Speaker 4 (02:17):
There are, of course, those who do not want us
to speak.

Speaker 6 (02:20):
If you think, just let me suspect.

Speaker 4 (02:21):
Even now, orders are being shouted into telephones, and men
with guns will soon be on their words. Why because
while the truncheon may be used, Liew of conversation. Words
will always retain their power. Words offer the means to meaning,
and for those who will listen, the enunciation of truth

(02:42):
and the truth is there is something terribly wrong with
this country, isn't there? If you desired it, sir, you
wanted it for a proof. You told me every television
in London cruelty and indus intolerance, its oppression. And where
once you have the freedom to object, don't think and
speak as you saw fit, you now have answers and
systems of surveillance coercing your conformity and severing your submichine cameras.

Speaker 7 (03:05):
How did this happen? Who's to blame?

Speaker 4 (03:09):
Well, certainly there are those who are more responsible than others.
They will be held accountable. But again, truth be told.
If you're looking for the guilty, you need only look
into a mirror.

Speaker 5 (03:20):
I know why you did it.

Speaker 3 (03:22):
I know you were afraid who in me?

Speaker 7 (03:25):
War, terror, disease.

Speaker 4 (03:28):
There were a miriad of problems which conspired to corrupt
your reason and rob you of your common sense. Fear
got the best of you, and in your panic, you
turned to the now High Chancellor Adam Saffler. He promised
you order He promised you peace, and all he demanded
in return was your silent, obedient consent.

Speaker 3 (03:47):
You're almost throat.

Speaker 4 (03:48):
Last night I sought to end that silence. Last night
I destroyed the old Bailey to remind this country of
what it has forgotten. More than four hundred years ago,
a great citizen wished to embed the fifth of November
forever in our memory. His hope was to remind the
world that fairness, justice, and freedom are more than words.

Speaker 5 (04:10):
They are perspectives.

Speaker 4 (04:12):
So if you've seen nothing, if the crimes of this
government remain unknown to you, then I would suggest that
you allow the fifth of November to pass unmarked. But
if you see what I see, if you feel as
I feel, and if you would seek as I seek,
then I ask you to stand the sight one year

(04:33):
from tonight outside the dates of Parliament, and together we
shall give them a fifth of November that shall never
ever be forgot.

Speaker 2 (04:45):
Yes, there scarce with war or terror, with disease especially,
and I only again not with the election, but I'm
going to begin with the disease scare. There were still
suffering under the lies, that we still suffer, under the
fact that the people who did this to us not
only were not punished, they were put back in power.
And what is Trump doing now? Just we'll take a

(05:09):
look at the election results on this stuff. But of
course it's not any solution to move to the Democrats.
That's jumping out of the frying pan and into a
different kind of fire. The fight for medical freedom continues
in Wisconsin, launching a new lawsuit as Scott and Cindy
Sarah over the murder of their daughter Grace. She celebrated

(05:32):
her nineteenth birthday lesson a month before they killed her
at the hospital, and they believe that she was targeted
to be killed because she had down syndrome that they
do not resuscitate order on her countermanding what the parents
had put on. They're now petitioning the Circuit court for
a new trial based on evidence they said has recently

(05:52):
come to light. They lost the first trial, which was
I believe a miscarriage of justice, and they mentioned in
the new motion and several issues with this particular judge.
For example, after one of my attorneys informed the judge
that I had given an interview to a particular paper
several days prior, and he mentions a Sampleton Post Crescent

(06:16):
if that means anything to you. Judge McGuinness stayed that
he found that offensive, that there would be a consequence,
and then he summarily denied all my motions. He said, well,
it wasn't until September the tenth of this year he
said that I had any knowledge or reason to believe
that Judge McGinnis might have a personal resentment toward the
Post Crescent. It was only then that I learned, on

(06:38):
January the twenty fourth, that had published an article critical
of Judge McGinnis and his rulings, a legging that they
were based on personal bias. And I've had a personal
situation like that as well. When the people we sold
our business to declared bankruptcy. I had the guy that
had as a lawyer came in and somebody later after
that said, you lost that case when you went in

(07:01):
there with that lawyer. He had a history with the judge.
The judge had it was a bankruptcy attorney. They have
people specializing that, and he said the judge that this
attorney had vouched for this guy that he was not
going to leave the country. And it appeared that this

(07:23):
guy helped to get his client out of the country
and it was that judge, and that had just happened
a couple of months before I went in there with
the same guy, So it was like he was going
to make sure that I was not going to get
out of there without getting his wrath anyway. So this
judge had an issue with a paper that Scott Shaff

(07:45):
had done the interview with. He said, had the judge
upon hearing of my interview with a local publication and
for me of the above facts, I would have asked
for his recusal or I would have sought for his
removal from the case because of his personal bias. My
trial attorneys did not inform me of this situation, so

(08:05):
my late discovery this information did not arise from a
lack of diligence on my part in seeking to discover it.
He's another recent revelation showing the court issued over fifty
thousand dollars in cost judgments against the plaintiff and violation
of the law showed that the court had a personal
bias against us throughout the trial. The court allowed defendants

(08:28):
to attack the plaintiff and his family members on the
basis of their religious beliefs and their views of medicine,
and the broader healthcare system. But the statute, and he
quotes it in the estate, especially prohibits evidence of religious
beliefs or opinions to show that the witness's credibility is

(08:48):
impaired or enhanced. So there you go. You can't use
somebody's religious beliefs as something to bolster or to attack
somebody's credibility. There's a law against that. Third issue is
a request in a previous trial for declatory judgment by
the judge regarding an illegal do not resuscitate that was

(09:12):
put on the daughter's chart. Now this is just a
statement of fact, and so this was put on in
violation of a law. There was no question of whether
they did this or not. So he said the court
should issue a declaratory judgment. But they did not do
that in that particular case. And he said, and finally,

(09:32):
another topic raised in the motion regards the judge's dismissal
of a battery claim that from a nurse that was there.
And he said, using the overarching idea that a patient
giving implied consent by being in a hospital, the court
based its dismissal on the finding that the plaintiff had
consented to this contact and so basically what the judge said, well,

(09:56):
if you go into an hospital, they can do whatever
they want to to you. You've consented to everything they're
going to do. Well, that's simply not true. I mean
when I was just in the hospital, there were several
things that I did not consent to and they did
not push further with COVID injections, are risking pilots having
inflight seizures. We're going to talk about what is going

(10:18):
on with the airline shutdown as well. And the back
and forth with Trump is just like the terriffs. He
cannot make up his mind what he's going to do
about the food, the snap issue and the food stamps.
It's on again, it's off again, it's on again, it's
off again and again. When we look at what is
happening with the TSA, the questions are as we approach Thanksgiving, Really,

(10:42):
what is going to happen with one of the busiest
traveling days of the year, if not the busiest. So,
but this is beyond that. Forget about the air traffic
controllers for a second, the shortage of them. This is
the in flight loss of the pilots because of seizures,
because of the jabs that were being pushed and mandated

(11:02):
by the airlines. Why would they do that, Well, because
the government wanted them to do that. You do whatever
you need to to curry favor with the government, or
they will basically find a way to get you out
of business. And we'll be talking more about that along
the lines of the Palace, the Epstein Palace that Trump
is building in Washington, What is going on with those

(11:24):
people there, and what have we learned about that The
FAA stopped entering the data into the Incapacitation Data Registry
very early in twenty twenty one, and then they completely
canceled the program in twenty twenty two and got rid
of the records. So we don't know who took the

(11:44):
injections and when they took it. We just know that
the airlines were forcing people to do it, and we
know that people are having issues with seizures.

Speaker 3 (11:54):
And the only reason to get rid of that data
is because it shows things you don't want people see.

Speaker 2 (12:00):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (12:00):
These people are obsessed with data, keeping their hands on
every last little bit they can get on anybody. But
the second this happens to AH, throw the entire program away,
delete everything don't let anybody see it.

Speaker 2 (12:11):
Yeah, you look at all the everything about the Internet,
everything about AI, everything that the government is doing. It's
all about big data. They built the NSA built these
data facilities, one of them in Bluffdale, Utah, out in
the middle of the desert where there's no water to
cool the place anyway. They built these centers so that
could store everything about everybody. But then they don't want

(12:32):
you to see the data.

Speaker 6 (12:33):
They realized that information has power, so why would they
give it to their enemies?

Speaker 2 (12:36):
That's right, that's right. Airline pilots are forced to be
injected with a product that causes subclinical myocarditis. In other words,
you don't see that it's there, and it has been
tied to cerebrovascular events, including seizures, several years after the injections.
So you concluded by issuing a call for pilots and
other airline crew members to voluntarily have medical tests done

(12:59):
to assess their of an inflight seizure or cardiac event
that will never happen. I mean, you might as well
just give up your career if you do something like that.
And so this is from Brownstone. It's an excellent article
from David Bell, who used to work for the who
he's seen the light now discussion on COVID vaccination should

(13:22):
be non controversial. And I got to say, just like
climate change, just like autism, just like any of these things.
Especially if you've got something that's a real problem that
you can see, like autism, you definitely should be concerned
about looking to see what is causing it. But we
see over and over again the first knee jerk response

(13:43):
of the government and the press is don't.

Speaker 3 (13:45):
Look at that.

Speaker 2 (13:46):
You're crazy if you look at that. There's nothing to
see here. And then when it comes to a climate change,
what you're supposed to see things that aren't there. So
don't pay attention to the obvious problems that you see. Instead,
we want you focused on these problems that you can't see,
that are in our mind and our propaganda. So the mRNA,

(14:08):
the modified RNA, maybe you should call it a monster RNA,
that's what they stands for.

Speaker 3 (14:14):
One of the things to think about is with how
upside down and twisted everything is, with how much insanity
the average person believes they're almost effectively living in a
virtual world. At this point, they are so disconnected from
reality that's true that you know, what's the big difference
if they slap on a pair of VR goggles in

(14:35):
the near future. They're not paying it. They're not connected
in any real way. As it is, they're checked out.
They believe everything they see on the screen, anything someone
from their authority structure tells them, whether they're Republican. If
it's Donald Trump says it, it's the you know, it's
the gospel. If you know whoever the Democrat leader is
of the moment, maybe it's gonna be Zoran mom Donnie
whatever he says. You know, Oh he said it. It's

(14:57):
gotta be true.

Speaker 2 (14:58):
That's right. So who or I have said it than
the opposite, the exact opposite. It's got to be true, yeah,
which usually is the case anyway, now that we live
in a bipolar world here where that's what they want
you to think. They want to sell you that false dichotomy.
It's either this or that. Just be careful people who

(15:18):
give you only two choices on everything. Well, the mRNA,
of course, our body normally does that. It uses mRNA
to copy a segment of our own DNA, and that's
used to manufacture proteins. However, that mRNA is very short lived.
It only lasts for hours, maybe for days, But the

(15:38):
mRNA vaccines are modified to make them persist longer than
our mRNA. Studies have shown that this works with mRNA
and spike protein, that it's detectable weeks or months after injection.
I would say, we've had cases. There was a nurse
who saw it for years afterwards. It was something that

(16:00):
fifteen hundred days, so we're talking like five years or so.
These are not shocking revelations, however, they are intended outcomes
of the design of this drug. The problem is that
the public was told in twenty twenty one that the
vaccines act like their own mRNA and that they rapidly

(16:22):
break down. This sounds much safer. The public, he says,
was deliberately misinformed. In other words, they lied to us
an unquestionable breach of ethics. Here, the modified RNA vaccines
induce an autoimmune response by design, he emphasized, convincing the

(16:45):
body to attack and kill some of its own cells.
They do this for an indeterminate amount of time, with
ndeterminate intensity in terms of spike protein production, as the
persistence of the mRNA and the amount that spreads to
cells throughout the by will vary from person to person.
This therefore carries inherent risks of killing cells that we

(17:07):
would prefer to keep, he says. It also causes a
generalized inflammatory response. The inflammatory response is probably one of
the reasons why people often feel particularly sick after getting
an mRNA vaccine injection. But of course Trump told us
it was great. It saved millions of lives. He lied

(17:29):
about every single aspect of this as he was channeling
hundreds of billions of dollars to pharmaceutical companies. How in
the world could anyone ever support someone like that? I
will never understand. Makes me so angry every time I
think about what he has done and what he's gotten
away with. One of the greatest criminals of all time.

(17:50):
It's just amazing. He did it globally as well, a
sneaky little poisoner. The point here is that whatever new
data is coming out on co in vaccines, the public
was systematically misled, misinformed, and lied to by our public
health agencies and our president. This is not controversial. They

(18:12):
simply were. We can wonder at the lack of interest
in the excess deaths and the vaccinated group of the
unvaccinated in the six month Pfizer trial that was published
in twenty twenty one. We can wonder about the lack
of any detectable benefit on mortality in the equivalent moderna trial.
We can wonder at the secrecy around the commitment of

(18:34):
hundreds of billions of dollars of public funds and pre
purchased commitments, sometimes negotiated by text messages, as we saw
in the UK from Ursula Fond of Wine, and how
the people who did this are still in power Donald

(18:55):
Trump exhibit A. We can really wonder why there's so
little solid data on overall mortality and disability of vaccinated
versus unvaccinated people when this is such an obvious thing
for governments to check. The point is that new bombshell
studies and quote never the same again publications, while important,

(19:20):
are not necessary to explain the enormity of the straight
lies that were foisted upon the public by our authorities
now for the past several years. We do not need
new inquiries. We just need to act like adults. We
all know that putting on a mask at a cafe
door so that you could then take it off when

(19:41):
you got seated at the table was never adult behavior.
And I got to say that. I argued with restaurant owners.
I would get them to get the manager or the
owner of the restaurant to come out there, and a
lot of them say, I know, you just have to
do it. It's like, no, I don't. I'm not going to
live by lie. I will never see you'll never see
see me again. I will never spend another penny in

(20:03):
this restaurant. And I said it as loudly as I
could so everybody would hear me, because the rest of
these people were playing that game. Don't live by lies.
I'm sick of living in a cowardly deceptive country that
is subordinate to these kinds of liars playing these hoaxes

(20:23):
on us. I don't play children's games, Simon says, or
Fauci says, or Trump says, not going to do it.
Don't you do it either. We know that being lied
to repeatedly then pretending that we weren't lied to is
not adult either. There comes a time when we all
need to face what is in front of us, because

(20:44):
if we live by lies, we will live in a
totalitarian society, as souls in its and warned us, and
we are making the chains that are going to bind us.
We are forging that we're the ones who are responsible
for this. That's why I played that clip today. Big

(21:05):
money really has enormous power over what we think and
what we do, far more than we could ever imagined
a few short years ago. But when this has become
really obvious, we need to stop finding excuses and stop
waiting for more revelations. We already know everything about this.
By the way, we knew this stuff five years ago.

Speaker 3 (21:23):
We knew this.

Speaker 2 (21:24):
You could put it together, didn't need a study. I mean,
just look at these people. They're obviously lying to us.
I mean you have to go back and get their
fringer prints or something. When you see them walking out
with something of the store, No, you know they're shoplifting.
So you can look at their actions. You can tell
what they're doing. I mean, you can get forensic about it.
But we don't need to get forensic about it. All

(21:46):
this stuff that is out there, and I cover it
because I want to emphasize it for people who may
be trusting the lies that are coming to them from
these medical doctors. That's the only reason I cover that.
But as far as the politicians, go and the orders
and all the rest of this stuff. Know the truth
and have known the truth for five years at a
bare minimum. We need to stop believing those who funded

(22:09):
who are funded in order to lie. That's right. We
need to stop finding excuses for them and stop waiting
for more revelations, and we need to stop believing those
who are paid to lie. That's David Bell from Brownstone.
I couldn't agree more with him. And so that brings
us to one piece of medical information I'll just get
you kind of a warning for and also another data point.

(22:33):
Gabapentin is a pain pill that is being prescribed for
pretty much everything. They said, the pill for everything. Why
off label gabapentin prescriptions are soaring not it's that term
off label. What does that mean? Well, that means when
you've got a drug like a droxy corquin HCQ or
you've got ivermictin that have been used for sixty seventy years,

(22:57):
they've been authorized by the government. They said, well, okay,
we you know, we'll it. We'll authorize it for this
particular use right for a river parasite or something like that.
But they have now got decades of information about its safety. Profile,
and other people use it for different things other than

(23:20):
the river parasite that they initially authorized it for. That's
called off label use. That has always been done, always
been done for drugs, except they wouldn't allow it during COVID.
That was one of the big, big signs that they
were lying. Can't have anything but the vac scene, and
of course that's what they'd practiced since two weeks before

(23:43):
nine to eleven with Dark Winter two months. I'm sorry,
and so we knew what was happening with that. There's
absolutely no question about it. There's no question that this
stuff was not safe and that they had a different agenda.
So gabapentin was authorized for.

Speaker 3 (24:01):
Whatever.

Speaker 2 (24:01):
But now they are prescribing it for everything back, pain, insomnia,
and it is soaring, becoming one of the most used
drugs on the list, even higher than most of the
things that you've heard a lot about. Because people are
using it olderly, people they got pain. They can't really

(24:24):
kind of figure out where it is, you know what
that's like. I've started last year, So that started to
hit me that you get sixty five or older, whatever
they start, you've got something is wrong. You get some
pain somewhere rather than trying to get to the source
of it, they give you a paint color. And so
that's what's happening with this. So especially for back pain,

(24:48):
and people are starting to get concerned about it because
it does have some issues, and so they're using it
for all types of pain. We had an experience with
this because excuse me, I gotta get something to drink. Here,
go ahead.

Speaker 3 (25:04):
Yeah, the GABA pintin is again, like you said, they
prescribe it for everything. They just throw it at whatever
problem you've got, and they don't care about the side effects.
Doctors never seem to care about the side effects at all,
no matter how bad they are, no matter how nasty
they can be. She's like, well, you know there's some
side effects.

Speaker 2 (25:23):
Well, they use it to cover up stuff, right, And
in this story, they have a guy who was having
a lot of pain that was keeping him up at
night and went to his doctor can figure out what
it was. I said, you just not have delivered it,
so let me give you some gabapentin. And he keeps
upping the ante on it all the time. And so
that's the first thing about medicine number one. They don't

(25:43):
address the root cause they just ethicize you, essentially. And
then the other thing is that this off label fraud
that was pulled against us. But the other issue, and
I want to caution people about it because when I
saw this, our own personal story is in the article here.
Some of his older patients have experienced falls or had

(26:04):
to stop driving because the gabapentin's more common side effects
like dizziness, And that was exactly what happened to Karen.
She had to have an operation. They gave her gabapentin
the operation, and then gave her a pill after that.
We only took like that for one day, and then
she had a fall, you know, and fortunately she didn't

(26:25):
get hurt, but.

Speaker 3 (26:28):
Not seriously. But gabapitin is slightly less dangerous than frozen
ground in a chicken coop, So.

Speaker 2 (26:35):
That's right. So you know, when you look at this,
just don't think that painkillers and antibiotics are harmless things.

Speaker 3 (26:44):
They're not.

Speaker 2 (26:45):
All the pharmaceuticals are very dangerous. And then when we
looked this up because she got so dizzy and she fell,
then I did the research on it because they had
given it to her as part of the operation, and
I did the research on it. They said, be careful
because if you get off of it, you're going to
have withdrawal symptoms. But then I did more, and because

(27:06):
she had been on it for such a short time,
we just stopped at Cold Turkey. Unfortunately, she didn't have
any more issues with it. So they're saying here, the
potential for a person to go through withdrawal after taking
GABA penton is why doctors recommend gractually tapering off the medication,
And so they talk about a lot of different issues,
including sometimes seizures if you get off of it very quickly.

(27:30):
So just a word of warning about pharmaceutical stuff in general.
It truly is dangerous, incredibly dangerous. We've got a couple
of a couple of comments here.

Speaker 3 (27:42):
Yes we do. And I want to say thank you
Irs machine Gun once again. What a terrifying username, he says,
preach thank you.

Speaker 2 (27:51):
I guess I got kind of excited.

Speaker 3 (27:53):
About that just a little bit.

Speaker 2 (27:57):
I feel really strongly about that. I mean, it's just
it bothered me so much to see it. I knew
what was happening, and by the time, by the time
we got to June, it seemed to me like an
eternity and it seemed to me like everybody was going
to go along with this, even though that even if
they were onto the game, they would still go on
with it. It's like the different ret Like I said,
we had to leave Austin because I'd basically burn my

(28:18):
bridges at every place that we could go to, any
public place. I had an argument with.

Speaker 3 (28:23):
Them, So no safe spaces. We have KWD sixty eight.
So it's time to install some bought speakers in the
Empire State Building for call to prayer. That's right. You
can hear the utulating cry as you roll on by, and.

Speaker 2 (28:42):
That really is it. I think it's not more than
it is is Islamic thing, and you know the pushback
against that. I think it's that more than it is socialism.
I think a long history of socialists and communists as
mayors in New York. That's why the place is in
the shape that it's in right now.

Speaker 3 (28:59):
It's only going to get work.

Speaker 2 (29:00):
So that was what Mesa said. They say, go ahead
and like them, and it'll be exhibit A for why
we don't want to have this where we live. For
everybody else and the rest of the country.

Speaker 3 (29:08):
I'm all for accelerationism, just so long as it's not anywhere.
I am accelerating New York City into the smoldering crater.
It will eventually become well, you know who knew.

Speaker 6 (29:18):
Escape from New York was a documentary.

Speaker 3 (29:23):
Replying to Pezidentovante seventeen seventy six, all thanks to a
bloated Leviathan federal government monstrosity who's left his employees live
in suburban DC Virginia. It's truly amazing how swamped Virginia
is by the DC Democrats. Oh yeah, Virginia, the rural areas,
it's full of some of the most right wing conservative

(29:43):
people you will ever meet. Their solid and then you
get to places like Virginia Beach.

Speaker 2 (29:49):
Or whatever, especially the suburbs of Washington.

Speaker 3 (29:52):
Yeah, just right outside d C. And the Virginia area.
It is loaded with just these parasites.

Speaker 2 (30:00):
You can see the results of that in the election yesterday.

Speaker 5 (30:03):
We'll talk about that.

Speaker 3 (30:05):
And if I tire in seventy seventy six, well, that's
part of it. But there's lots of swing voters in
BA and they swung left you to loathing Trump. I
would Trump keep the government shut down, to the government,
there by hurting lots of your base voters when there's
big elections going on, because it was done on purpose,
in my opinion, I think so.

Speaker 2 (30:22):
I mean, I look at this and I said, you know,
clearly they've got to understand what they're doing when they
do this law fair against Trump. The charges were absurd
and everybody saw it. James Carvill, what you're doing. You're
going to get Trump Aliketedness, I said at the time,
I said, that's the point. I see it. Carvill sees it.
We all know what the Democrats are doing. This is

(30:42):
the left right march at tyranny, and so you know
Trump is doing his march right now to make sure
that Democrats come roaring in with all the socialist policies
by the midterm. But of course the other part of
that is they're going to surely impeach him this time
because they got real reasons to impeach him this time.

Speaker 3 (30:59):
Do not says Trump sold the product on the White
House stage behind the podium, acting as a representative of
the evil Pharmakia while never offering honest and true informed consent.
And he's still doing it.

Speaker 2 (31:10):
I mean, you know, he just did this deal with
the Trump family, a corrupt deal with Trump family, and
Albert Borla to was it trump RX He called it
I believe so, Yeah, I want to have the Trump
ex as in gone. But anyway, he's still doing that
kind of stuff. And he was booed. Remember the clips
I played, He was booed when he introduced Albert Borlas,

(31:32):
this great guy, and the people who were there booed him.

Speaker 3 (31:35):
You know who that is coming.

Speaker 2 (31:37):
Yeah, they still vote for Trump. See, that's the thing.
They live by lies. Maga lives by the big lie
they live. They oppose all the stuff that Trump has done,
and even the stuff that he's doing now, much of it,
and yet they keep voting for him.

Speaker 5 (31:53):
They keep voting for him.

Speaker 1 (31:55):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (31:55):
Pausento Avante seventeen seventy six much appreciate the fiery, righteous indignation.
Nad Lander, thank you, and he says, Cleveland clinic killed
my mother with the shot, knowing she had cancer and
high blood pressure. She died three days later. I'm so sorry,
nad Lander, so sorry to hear that.

Speaker 2 (32:12):
Yes, I'm sorry. It just it really is a tragedy.
And the story of Grace is such a tragedy. How
they kicked the family out and they watched them on
zoom killed their daughter. It's just just amazing, powerless to
do anything about it.

Speaker 3 (32:28):
I cannot believe how still kind and calm the family
has been through this. Yeah, And it's just if that
was me, I would not be able to exemplify that
level of christ Like. I don't know, just ability to still,

(32:51):
like I said, remain kind and calm while still having
had this wrong, this evil done to you. Yes, is
truly it's an amazing thing to see. Our family is
very mature Christians.

Speaker 2 (33:04):
We're gonna take a quick break and we'll be right
back making sense common again. You're listening to the David

(34:45):
Knight Show.

Speaker 7 (34:52):
If you like the Eagles, that dog doesn't Hallway.

Speaker 8 (34:55):
The cars and Healey Lewis and the news, they say
the horror, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio,
download our app, or listen now at apsradio dot com.

Speaker 2 (35:10):
Yes, I have a comment regarding what I said yesterday.
I sent to me by Matt. By the way, if
you want to send comments, if you want to ask questions,
it's been a while since we've done and asked me anything. Show.
We should schedule that and let people anyway. This is
from Matt. He said. I used to work security with
a young man who is always wearing a Punisher T
shirt under his uniform. We were armed security. I always

(35:33):
wondered what kind of more would do something like that,
knowing that they may have to fire their firearm. Pretty
much indefensible behavior, if you ask me. It just makes
it clear that you're out to hurt someone. Any justification
would easily be compromised by wearing such things. To hear
the police departments are okay with that is disgusting.

Speaker 3 (35:53):
I thought it was.

Speaker 2 (35:54):
It's been a good deal of time talking about that yesterday.

Speaker 3 (35:56):
You don't want to be involved in a court case
and they pull up the fact, so you were wearing
the Punisher teacher the punish of the guy that killing
all the criminals when you shot this man, right.

Speaker 2 (36:07):
Yeah, you might actually have a justification, but that would
basically blow it, I think, except I don't.

Speaker 6 (36:11):
Think that would be applied in the case of cops.

Speaker 2 (36:14):
That's right. Well, they got all kinds of unusual immunity
that is there, but it is disgusting that they would
do that. I just want to thank people. And I
had this list for the last couple of days and
I kept forgetting to bring it with me. People on
zel who contributed at the end of the month, and
then a few people that have contributed so far this month.
I want to thank then. It won't take very long.

(36:36):
Let me just run through this. Gregory C, David S,
Kenneth C, Carl H, Ronald H, Joseph R. Susan L.
Lisa Kay, Ryan F, Charles D, Daniel C, Bobby P,
Janie W, Kimberly M and Mary M. Thank you. That's

(36:58):
the people who contributed in October. And as I said,
it doesn't take so long. We have a few people
who are very strong supporters and regular supporters and we
really do appreciate them. They're the ones who really bring
this program to you. And then in November, so far
we've had William W. Michael L, Kevin M, Maurice W,

(37:21):
Mauraldo P. And Lyndon H. And by the way, one
of these, Bobby P, was a new supporter, so I
just want to thank him for that. And on cash
app we had at the end of the month and
the beginning of this month we had Dustin W.

Speaker 3 (37:35):
And Christopher. So thank you very.

Speaker 5 (37:37):
Much to those of you who support us.

Speaker 2 (37:39):
I want to talk a little bit about the election
yesterday and the consequences of this, and of course, leading
up to it, Trump came out with his endorsement for
a fellow Democrat. Andrew Cuomo always said Trump is a
New York City Democrat, and he showed it. And again
he's not going to stand on principle. He's not going
to stand with a principal republic. He will go for Coombo.

(38:03):
So hey, Curtis Sliwa, who was there. He says that
Curtis Sliwa, it looks much better without the beret, because
it's not about policy at all, It's about how does
this guy look on TV? He said, to vote for
him is a vote for man. Danny Well. I really
hate that. I have heard that all my life in
terms of independent candidates and in terms of third parties,

(38:28):
and I can't say enough about my contempt for that
whole mentality.

Speaker 6 (38:34):
But it's not entirely inaccurate with fierce past the post
voting that always evolves into a two party system. This
is why comments like that are why we need something
like ranked choice or approval voting.

Speaker 2 (38:49):
I agree, or just to ease up their regulations and
let there be some third parties that are out there.
They're really competitive, I understand still, when you count the votes,
you got to go back to the proportional stuff. But
the rigging of the elections begins with their ballot access rules,
with their debate rules, and all the rest of this.
And there is a a collaboration between the two major

(39:11):
parties and the media. In case you haven't noticed, right,
most of the media is hook joined at the hip
with the Democrats. Of course Fox News is with the Republicans.
Neither one of them are going to do anything to
alienate that relationship that they have with the political party
that they have chosen to serve, and they are servants

(39:33):
of those political parties. But in this particular case, it
was not true because you had Mom Danny got fifty
four percent of the vote, and you had the combined
votes of both Cuomo and Sliwa. Of course going to
be less than fifty point four percent, but it was

(39:55):
actually forty eight point seven. Other words, we had almost
one percent of the vote that they don't tell you
about as to who that is. That's another grievance of mine, right,
So one percent of the people who voted, which in
this particular case was quite a few people because you
had that's like what twenty thousand people I guess who

(40:18):
voted for some because they had about two million votes,
or they broke two million votes. I don't know what
the total was, but it was the first time they'd
had more than two million votes in New York since
nineteen sixty nine. That's still only about a quarter of
the population that bothered to show up, even though it's
record for the last several decades there. So most of

(40:39):
the votes did go to Cuomo. He got forty one
point six Sliwa got seven point one percent of the vote.
But again, I'm just not into this lesser of two evils.
I never have been, never will be. So he says,
whether or not you like it, you really have no choice.
You got to vote for Cuomo, said Trump, And of

(41:02):
course it was known that he was not going to
make it because he had already been defeated in a
two way race by Mom Danny. So you want to
talk about you want to do a practical aspect. There's
no practical reason for you to choose to vote for
Cuomo anyway. So so that he became the nominee this

(41:23):
past week after Cuomo trailed in the second place. And
so they're still trying to sell this thing. You know,
vote for Cuomo and he can win. Well, it wouldn't
have helped if all the people who had voted for
the third party candidates as well as for Sliwa as
well as for Cuomo, if they had all voted for

(41:43):
one of those candidates, Cuomo, he still would have lost
to ma'am Donnie.

Speaker 3 (41:46):
He just reminds me of that continual here's how Bernie
can still win.

Speaker 2 (41:52):
Yeah, yeah, well, you know, the question is you know,
which socialist do you want to have in there? That's
the issue. I don't know who the independent candidate was,
but I don't think Curtis Leiwa was a socialist. But
when we look at Cuomo versus Mom Danny, a's which
social steam went. But that's not the real issue. The
real issue was over Zionism, really, and you had some

(42:15):
Orthodox Jews who supported ma'am Danny because they're anti Zionists.
Here's one of them speaking.

Speaker 9 (42:22):
My name is Abbi David Feldman and Whitney Tura Karta International.

Speaker 2 (42:25):
We are standing here on.

Speaker 9 (42:26):
The steps of New York City City Hall, and we
are here while we are unfortunately seeing this terrible intimidation
against candidates from mayor here in the city, mister Mam Danny,
And this is disturbing to so many Jewish people. This
harassments and these intimidations is about his brave stunce to
speaking up to what he believes is right, and he's

(42:48):
speaking up against the crimes being committed to the Palestinian people.
Now they are condemning him as antisemitic because he is
against the state of Israel.

Speaker 2 (42:58):
This is misleading, This is.

Speaker 9 (42:59):
On and this is dangerous. We need politicians to be
on the right side of history and to speak of
further oppress. We as New Yorkers, we as citizens of
the United States, we should have denied a brave politicians
and we should give them the freedom to express what
they believe is right. And we encourage people voters to

(43:20):
vote what is in the interests of our city and
not in the interest of a foreign country, the state
of Israel, and certainly not in the interest of crimes
being committed.

Speaker 2 (43:30):
To other side of the world.

Speaker 9 (43:31):
We as Jewish people, say that conflating anti Zionism with antisemitism,
conflating Judaism with Zionism, is not only doing in justice
to the Palestinian people, This is dangerous for the Jewish
people as well, because what this is doing is this
is generalizing all Jews, saying that God forbid all Jews
or in support of all these crimes, which ends up

(43:52):
making a statement that all Jews are accountable to what
is taking place. This is antisemitism and this generalization.

Speaker 5 (43:59):
Is racist them.

Speaker 9 (44:00):
This is not done by some people out here. This
is done by this movement of Zionism who claims to
represent old Jews. In no way does the State of
Israel or its actions represent world Judy and certainly doesn't
represent the Jewish religions.

Speaker 7 (44:14):
All that Israel stands for.

Speaker 9 (44:16):
Isn't total violation, not only of international or the violation
of Judaism.

Speaker 7 (44:20):
This has to be stopped.

Speaker 9 (44:21):
We urged right minded people to be brave and to
raise their voice.

Speaker 2 (44:33):
That's right. I absolutely agree with him. That's the key thing.
You know. You look at these politicians, these Zionists who
are pushing a state of Israel and then one of
the most murderous, lying criminals you've ever seen in office
of a politician, and that's saying something. But they're out
there to use whatever means they can, no matter how

(44:54):
obviously they're lying, they will use it to shut people down,
and that's what he's pushing back, and he says, if
you conflate these two things, if you say you're against
the political state of Israel, then you're anti Semitic and
you hate Jews. He said that simply isn't true. And
the danger of that is that it generalizes all Jews
as if they were supporters of net Nyahu, and a

(45:15):
lot of them are not, especially the Orthdox Jews. As
a matter of fact, the Orthonox Jews believe that if
God has they believed that God has promised them the
land and that God will deliver it, not Metnyah, who
they don't like Metna, Who's means. They prefer to wait
for God to do it for them. And it just

(45:37):
amazes me that Christians wouldn't see it that way as well.
So if you believe that God is going to restore
them to the land, I think that you should trust
God to do it so that you don't have to
violate his ten commandments in order to do it, and
the pretty much violated every single one. So anyway, New
York City will be a complete and total economic and

(45:58):
social disaster. Should ma'am, Donnie Wynn said Trump. Trump's last
minute endorsement comes after the president's ally and Tesla billionaire
Elon Musk endorsed Cuomo, along with many other billionaires like
former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg. You know, I
got this a if I wanted to vote in New York,

(46:21):
I would be really I would really be on the
horns of a dilemma. You know, do I vote for
this Marxist is opened Marxist Muslim or do I vote
for the person that Bloomberg wants, that Musk wants, that
Trump wants. I mean, it's just.

Speaker 3 (46:37):
I think the writing's on the wall. I think it's
time to evacuate. Yeah, if you're in New York. I again,
I know people can't just pick up and leave, but
if you can, if you're in New York, Oh, they're
talking about it. Yeah, if you can get out, This
is the time, mom, Donnie's not going to make anything better.

Speaker 6 (46:55):
So don't really see I mean, I get that he
was elected on a wave of anti Zionist feelings, but
I don't really see what the governor, i mean mayor
of New York has to do with that. Like, is
the City of New York sending money to Israel.

Speaker 2 (47:11):
Like yeah again, but it is very important for them
that they don't have a political figure who's going to
speak out and criticize what they do. Right as we
saw yesterday, Lance, you know, you can't have a Tucker
Cross and say anything negative about Israel or they come
after him. And not only him, they come after the
Heritage Foundation because Heritage Foundation is a sponsor of his

(47:33):
or whatever. So you know, Levin and Shapiro and the
Republican Jewish Coalition, they're going to come after anybody who
is in a position to influence opinion that doesn't agree
with their agenda. They won't come utter them by many
any means necessary. But you know, when you look at
this kind of an endorsement, when you got to me,

(47:55):
this is like to say nine out of ten billionaires
endorse That's kind of like saying nine out of ten
doctors smoke Campbell cigarettes. So you should too. I mean,
you go back and look at like I said Bloomberg
when I was using him in this example about what
bad mayors and what socialist mayors and they'd had in
the past. This is a guy who with Sadiq Khan,

(48:19):
the mayor of London, came up with the c Four
Cities organization to tell you that you can only have
three items of clothing a year, one trip every three
years of less than one thousand miles, no cars, no meat,
no dairy. How does it get worse than that? You
know people, you know Bloomberg is pushing this. He creates

(48:40):
an organization to do that, and then he supports Cuomo.
Is that not an endorsement of the other guy? When
you see something like that, Trump says, any Jewish person
who votes for Mandani is a stupid person. He said again,
it is all about the attitude towards Zionism that is there.
And I think it worked out to his advantage in

(49:02):
the sense that everybody else was seen as being afraid
to criticize Israel, and he spoke out. For whatever reason,
he was unafraid to speak out. And I think people
appreciated that authenticity, whether they agreed with it or not.
But anyway, Trump on Tuesday warned Jewish voters against supporting

(49:24):
zoron Mon Danny. He said, name Jewish person does it
is a proven and self professed jew hater. All up
the case and it's a stupid person. Well, I don't know,
but I think that orthodox rap I've been a lot
more since they think I've heard come out of Trump's mouth,
and he was standing for free speech as well, which
Trump does not stand. For a million New Yorkers and

(49:47):
a poll said that they will leave New York if
Mom Danny weds today's mural race. So brace yourself. People
who are quite comfortable with high taxes may be coming in,
moving down the street.

Speaker 3 (49:58):
Far your doors. Don't let them in.

Speaker 2 (50:02):
Nine percent of residence would That's the thing. When we
lived in Florida, so many people would relocate from New
York and they were just fine. They would rubber stamp
every kind of tax and fee that would come down
the line. Yeah, no problem. They don't realize what ran
their city.

Speaker 6 (50:14):
I saw a lot of that with Californians in Texas.

Speaker 2 (50:16):
Yeah, that's right. Nine percent of residents would definitely leave.
That's about seven hundred and sixty five thousand people, while
another twenty five percent would consider going. Raising fears of
an economic crisis. Well again they say they will, but
they probably won't. But I think a lot of these
people who have been paying really high taxes, this might

(50:37):
be the final straw, the last nail in the coffin,
and it may make them move out of there.

Speaker 6 (50:42):
Yeah. I don't think it'll be nine percent, but it
could be a pretty big exodus.

Speaker 2 (50:47):
Yeah. The wealthiest one percent fund roughly half of New
York City's income tax revenue, so it wouldn't take a
lot of people to leave. And I said percent of
those earning more than tw hundred and fifty thousand dollars
would move away. So it wouldn't take much of that
exodus of those people who are basically I think paying

(51:08):
attention for the most part. So Polster noted that older
New Yorkers, Staten Islanders, and white residents most likely to leave.
Some real estate buyers are already backing outside a realtor
they talked to. They don't want to hear about Mom
Danny and the rent freeze that he is proposing. Cities
like Boca Ratan are preparing to attract fleeing residents and businesses.

(51:32):
Mayor Scott Singer warned New York is quote about to
repeat some of the lessons from history that many voters
have forgotten or never knew. The survey shows Mom Danny
leading the race of forty five percent actually he did
better than that, he did fifty fifty point four percent.
Only fifty nine percent of New Yorkers say they would

(51:52):
definitely stay if he wins, so really strong feelings about
it there. Forty seven percent for see more crime and violence,
forty three percent expect fewer businesses, thirty nine percent think
the terrorism risk will worsen, and forty five percent predict
anti Semitism will increase. So he promises, here's the thing

(52:14):
that he promises, And let me ask you, are these
are things that Cuomo would do? Are these things that
Bloomberg tried to do and that Rudy Giuliani tried to?
Free childcare, rent, freezes public grocery stores. That's a new one.
That's I haven't seen that before. And free buses and

(52:35):
higher taxes. Seems to me like he's kind of a
standard New York City democrats, very much like Trump as well.
Trump's got some of these same ideas. The only promise
that he can really deliver on here, folks, is going
to be higher taxes, and you better believe that he's
going to do that. He can't make the free buses
and the free childcare really work for very long, but

(52:59):
he can raise tax.

Speaker 3 (53:03):
If you think schools are bad, imagine putting your child
directly into government subsidized childcare. Yeah, imagine the horrific class
of human being that is going to be working at
these places. The type of person that is going to
sit there and go, yeah, I'll probably get paid a
small amount of money to deal with this. They're not

(53:25):
going to be good people. There's going to be a
large subset of them that are going to be just.

Speaker 2 (53:32):
Well. I would just you know how we were. I mean,
I would never trust you guys to anybody that I
didn't know, even on the Disney cruise, right we I
imagine those people are paid pretty well, but I don't
know them. I mean, the total strangers. They thought it
was really strange that, you know, we would say, we're
going to watch what you guys do. We're going to
stay where can we sit so we can watch this?

(53:53):
And their whole thing was that you would get on
the ship and you would put a risk van on
the kids so they could match them up with the
parents later. No, no, no, you're not going to do that.
It was really amazing. Again, that was not our choice.
I don't ever choose to go on a cruise except

(54:15):
to appease some family member. And this is real. They
called Kasos Karen's parents fiftieth anniversary with cruise. You lose. Yeah, Well,
Greg Abbott is worried about New Yorkers going to Texas.
He says he's he threatens a one row on New Yorkers.
Who's going to pay that? I mean, this is how

(54:37):
does that work? Are They're gonna set the Texas rangers
up at the border and look at the drivers.

Speaker 6 (54:43):
You know what Republicans really like right now is tariffs.
So I'm gonna put tariff on New Yorkers.

Speaker 2 (54:48):
I know this is That's one of the most insane
non sequiturs I've ever seen anybody come up with.

Speaker 3 (54:53):
Tariffs are so hot right now?

Speaker 2 (54:56):
That's right, that's right, one hundred percent tariff for tariff
on what I mean, I'm the person themselves. How do
you value that person? I don't. None of it makes
any sense.

Speaker 6 (55:04):
And before we move on, that's sort of that thing
about public grocery stores. I hadn't heard anything about that,
but I have seen a lot of videos of people
complaining in you know, these very leftist things where they
have Soros just das letting the criminals go free and
not enforcing shoplifting that Oh, look they're locking up all
the stuff, or look they're closing these things. This is racist.

(55:27):
They're creating a food desert. So I guess now they're
going to have a public grocery store where you can
loot all.

Speaker 2 (55:34):
You want, everybody can loose. We have universal looting, right
instead of universal basic income, of universal basic looting UBL.

Speaker 5 (55:44):
I've seen.

Speaker 6 (55:44):
I don't know if that's it, but that sounds like it.
A public grocery store.

Speaker 2 (55:50):
That's right. You just walk in there and take whatever
you want, and they just keep throwing the shelves back up,
because as we all know, the communists have figured out
that we have an infinite supply of material good. So
it's just how you're going to distribute it. So we'll
distribute it through the public gruchy stores. These people are idiots,
the But there's an interesting pushback that I've seen lance
on this eluting thing and the laws that are in California.

(56:13):
So there, you know, you can't do anything to anybody
if it's like nine hundred and sixty dollars or something.
You know, there's no shoplifting charge for up to nine
hundred and sixty dollars. So put a sign up and
they said, warning, all of our items are priced at
nine hundred and sixty five dollars. We have a discount

(56:34):
at the cash register for paying customers subtracted off of
there if you're actually going to pay for it, but
if you're going to steal it, its value is nine
hundred and sixty five dollars and you are criminally liable.
I thought that was a great approach, but I think
that a government that puts in a law like that
is not going to enforce that either. So anyway, what

(56:58):
he actually tweeted out, he said, after the polls closed
tomorrow night, I will impose a one hundred percent tariff
on anyone moving to Texas from New York City. So
today we wait to see what that's going to work.
These Republicans will just say anything now, I mean, they're
just as lunatic as the left. It's crazy.

Speaker 3 (57:21):
No one knows what it means, but it's provocative. Yeah,
it really gets the people going.

Speaker 2 (57:26):
That's right. So again, you know Trump liked Cuomo, you
must vote for him and hope that he does a
fantastic job. Again, just remember Hillary liked Trump, Trump's likes Cuomo.
There it's a club of New York City Democrats. That's
what it is. It is what it is. You also,
Trump also threatened with whole federal funds from New York

(57:49):
if Mon Danny wins. So we'll see see what happens
if communist Mom Danny wins the election for mayor of
New York City. It is highly unlikely I will be
contributing federal fund other than the very minimum as required
to my beloved first home. He said, Yeah, he really
loves New York. He really does. I'm sure not anymore.

(58:10):
Don't think I don't. But I think you can't take
the New York out of him. You know, you can
take the New York Democrat out of New York, but
you can't take the Democrat out of him. He's going
to carry that with him everywhere he goes.

Speaker 3 (58:22):
I feel like New York is one of those places
where if you grow up in Manhattan, specifically, if you
don't get out before you're about, you know, thirteen years old,
there's really no getting the New York out of you. Afterwards,
you are forever a New York no matter where you go.
No matter how much time you spend anywhere else, it
has molded you. It has shaped you, and you just

(58:43):
can't get rid of it. Well, Karen, like I said,
that is why I said Manhattan like she lived outside,
like close enough to have access, but not to have
it be direct influence. But there's just something about that,
you know, the cutthroat. You know, if you fall down
elm as people are making their way to the subway,
they'll just trample you. They're not going to put their

(59:04):
hand out to help you out.

Speaker 2 (59:05):
Well, a lot of that is just the big city
aspect of it. We see that in big cities everywhere.

Speaker 3 (59:09):
Now, It's true, but not all big cities have the
sense of ego that comes with living in New York.
You know, Chicago kind of knows it's crap. You know,
it's like, all right, we're violent. We've got a couple
things that are cool, but you know that you want
to trash all of them, all of them, every last one.

Speaker 2 (59:30):
Well, the Virginia elections have big consequences for abortion, and
it was won by the Democrat. That's there, And of course,
again when we look at it, what Trump is doing
for the Democrats for this election as well, as for
the midterm congressional elections next year. He has energized them.
And I said at the time, I said, the Republicans

(59:53):
who think that the snow King's rally is just a
AstroTurf thing paid for by Soros are fooling them and
they're going to find out well. Pro life organizations, we're
focusing on the House of Delegate races there in Virginia
because they're trying to put in a constitutional amendment to
enshrine abortion up to the point of birth, which is

(01:00:14):
truly amazing. Over the summer, college students with Susan B.
Anthony Pro Life America knocked on one hundred and fifty
thousand doors in Richmond and Virginia Beach areas to talk
to people about the pro abortion amendment. So we believe
the only way that we can stop this is to
have more Republicans in the state House. Well, I don't
know how that election turned out, but I do know

(01:00:36):
that they have a governor there who is very very
much pro abortion, and so the right now, the Democrat
Party has a very narrow lead in the Senate and
the House. I don't know what happened after that election,
but when you look at the goodnatorial race. I wonder
why we call it gubernatorial. Are we elected at goober usually?

Speaker 3 (01:00:58):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:01:00):
Anyway, the Republican goober candidate did not do very well
because she linked herself with Trump, and as people were
talking about the economy, which was the number one issue.
And even though you know, Trump and Maga is telling
us everything is wonderful, people are seeing the reality there
that they can't fool them on this. And so when

(01:01:24):
people talk to her about losing their jobs, and of
course again we were talking about it being a suburb
of d C. So that a lot of federal employees
who had been highly paid in their job and they
were very upset about it. She said, you know, job,
you can always get another job somewhere.

Speaker 3 (01:01:41):
It's terrible. You know, you got this nice job and
then because of some pedophile somewhere you can't get paid anymore.

Speaker 2 (01:01:49):
Well, she also was very weak on the abortion thing.
She said, well, I will go with the will of
the people. She wasn't going to stand on any principles
about that as well. So the the federal workers make
up the backbone of Virginia's economy really because they're so
highly paid. The shutdown has made things even worse. The
people who didn't lose their job before are now not

(01:02:13):
getting paid. And so when they asked her about it,
she said, well, how many of you here have ever
lost a job? Oh? You mean it's not unusual that
it happens to everybody.

Speaker 3 (01:02:24):
All the time.

Speaker 2 (01:02:24):
Okay, Well, the media is making out to be this huge,
huge thing. I don't understand why. So they took that
sound bite and played that over and over again, especially
if you're a federal employee. You think you got a
job for life, right, Burns said, people voting in the
election appear to think their jobs are indeed a huge thing.

(01:02:45):
So not only do Republicans not care about what's happening
to you, they don't even understand it. And so Spamberger,
who won, played that up along with abortion rights and
homosexual marriage, putting that into the Virgin Constitution. Then in Florida,
this is an article from mainstream media going out and

(01:03:09):
talking to people about Trump and their attitudes toward him,
and they found a lot of Hispanic voters there. They're
very angry about things as well as the economy, and
one person who's Trump voters that I'm angry with my
president did not like his policies. Economy was the number
one issue in New York City, but it's also a
big issue everywhere. And the bottom line is that Trump,

(01:03:32):
like Bloomberg, is a socialist central planner. He wants to
pick the winners and the losers. He wants to micro
manage the economy, along with a stupid Democrat that he
put in charge of, the terrorist of Peter Navara. And
so what you're going to get from people like Trump
and Peter Navara is you're going to get debt, you're

(01:03:55):
going to get inflation, you're going to get taxes, and
you're going to get regulation of everything, not just trade,
but everything domestically as well.

Speaker 3 (01:04:04):
It's truly amazing. For years, people have known personnel is policy,
no matter what the guy at the top says, it's
these people that are put into these positions where they
actually craft the policy that truely matter. And Trump floods
his staff with nothing but these at best neocons. At

(01:04:24):
best there neocons. Usually they're full on democrats or technocrats.

Speaker 2 (01:04:29):
Well, I mean, he's so angry at people like John
Bolton that he put in, but he put him in.
You know, he put this guy in you. I remember
when he put him in, everybody said what is he doing?
You know who is this guy? And I was saying, well,
I think that's really who he is. And I think
it is who he is because always can see him
openly embracing Lindsey Graham is his favorite senator now, and

(01:04:50):
he's openly embracing war, even though he keeps talking about
the Nobel Peace Prize. He's opening and embracing war.

Speaker 3 (01:04:57):
But these maga people will support him to no matter
what they'll say, oh, he made a mistake. Just how
many of us think that we could randomly hold trials
or go on Twitter and just pick someone out of
the blue, to scroll through one hundred different profiles and
find someone better for the job, any job in the
government that's right than what Trump, to suppose a genius

(01:05:20):
has picked out. You could do one hundred tryouts and
I guarantee you you personally could find someone better for this.

Speaker 7 (01:05:27):
Yes.

Speaker 2 (01:05:28):
Well, unfortunately, because Trump has been so unpopular in New York,
New Jersey, Virginia, places like that, you've got some really
really radical leftists that are there. And this is what
I said is going to happen with Trump. Ultimately, what
Trump is going to do is he's going to sell
a lot of precedents for a very authoritarian executive rule

(01:05:50):
by decree, and then he's going to hand the power
over to the Democrats by getting people really upset with him.
His mode of communicating, his mode of building his persona,
has always been about conflict.

Speaker 3 (01:06:05):
It's always been about professional.

Speaker 2 (01:06:07):
Wrestling and his connections and many appearances that he had
with Vince McMahon. You know, all these phony fights that
he picks and then the Apprentice You're fired. Right, It's
always about conflict, it's always about bullying, it's always about authoritarianism.
And he is setting that up as a precedent to
hand this over to the Democrats because people get sick

(01:06:27):
and tired of him personally and politically. And so now
we see in New Jersey we have the candidate who
won their Mikey Sheryl or Mickey Scheryl.

Speaker 3 (01:06:37):
I don't know, m I K I E.

Speaker 2 (01:06:40):
It's a woman who says parents cannot opt out of
LGBT brainwashing for their kids. Not in New Jersey. I'm sorry,
that's too important. We're going to do that to your kids.
You're not going to be able to opt out she
is the one who won. Thank you Trump. She demanded
taxpayers give money to plan parenthood, and she says parents

(01:07:02):
have no rights to opt out their children about offensive
LGBT lessons that violate their religious faith.

Speaker 3 (01:07:10):
The Supreme courtious weeks.

Speaker 2 (01:07:11):
Ago, in fact, confirmed that a school district in Montgomery County, Maryland,
must allow parents to opt children out of those lessons
if they want, But she said that parents should not
be allowed to take kids out of classes that teach
lessons violating their faith. She said, quote, I would push
an LGBT education into our schools. I thought they were

(01:07:32):
ready there. Parents have a right to opt out of
a lot of things, but this is not an area
where they should be opting out. This is an area
of understanding the background of people throughout our nation, she said.
And so now she has been enabled and put into
office by this blowback against Trump.

Speaker 3 (01:07:51):
I think I understand their background just fine.

Speaker 2 (01:07:54):
Yeah, that's right.

Speaker 3 (01:07:54):
I'm pretty sure I do. And I have a lot
of pity for them. I'm very so sorry for them.
We have a lot of comments. Marky Mark in New Jersey,
as it would happen. For what it's worth, American sniper
Chris Kyle Seal Unit used the Punisher's lego. I'd forgotten
about that. I had forgotten, but a yeah, I'm just

(01:08:21):
thinking of Jesse. Just even to raw Ratus Bro. Thank
you very much, Ratus Bro. We appreciate a big support.
We appreciate it. Americans are Sir Ian McKellen in the
green screen room every day. That's a very sad video.
In case I know you've seen it, I don't get
the reference. So during the filming of The Hobbit, Peter
Jackson had gone full on into CGI territory. He didn't

(01:08:44):
really care too much to do a lot of practical
effects like he did in the original Lord of the Rings.
For some reason, he was very enamored of the new technology.

Speaker 6 (01:08:51):
Well, I think it's just a big savings as opposed
to going to New Zealand everything. They were doing everything
in a small green roof.

Speaker 3 (01:08:57):
However, of course, if you've seen The Hobbit, you know
it's not nearly as good as Order Ring. He's not
even close. But Ian McKellen is sitting in this all
green room that they're going to turn into Bilbo's kitchen.
You know, they're all sitting around eating and it's just
him in there, and they're going to green screen and everyone,
and he eventually has just this breakdown where he's almost
in tears, and he says, this isn't what I became

(01:09:19):
an actor for. You know, the craft everything has changed
so dramatically. He's alone in a green room with cameras
pointed at him. He's not acting with another actor, there's
nothing to play off of. He's just there in a
green room with nothing, and he's sitting there.

Speaker 2 (01:09:34):
Just you know, I'm in a virtual reality.

Speaker 3 (01:09:37):
Hell, this is awful? What am I doing?

Speaker 6 (01:09:40):
As opposed to all the clever stuff they did with
forced perspective for the Hobbits in the original.

Speaker 2 (01:09:45):
Yeah, and in that you know, they went saw on specials.
You know, when they talked about how they would hand
make the armor, you know, the weapons, everything was crafted.

Speaker 3 (01:09:56):
They had two guys crafting chainmail non stop during the
entire higher filming of the movies.

Speaker 2 (01:10:01):
Yeah, everything was practical and real. And I think you know,
from his perspective, you know that that put him in
the moment, right, and and he kind of just feels
like he's standing out in this absurd situation, just you know, reciting.

Speaker 3 (01:10:19):
Lines into the ether. Yeah, I speak and they're.

Speaker 2 (01:10:25):
Gone, Yeah, I sympathize with that. I think that's a
that's a really valid point. I mean, and it's kind
of interesting too, because I guess maybe they didn't have
the technology where they could have gone virtual with that
stuff at the time. But you know, they went in
so far into getting all of that stuff ultra realistic,
even things that wouldn't necessarily show. And I remember when

(01:10:46):
we watched the clips of it, they were saying, well,
what it does is that it prepares the actors because
even though it may not show up on the camera,
you know, they can tell that it's there and that's
the reality.

Speaker 3 (01:10:59):
Yeah, And what they did for Lord of the Rings,
it kind of was the last movie of its kind
ever made, this massive, massive, massive production where everything was
you know, handmade, it was crafted for purpose, and just
you don't see that kind of thing anymore. It's just, oh,
we'll do it in post, we'll do it in the

(01:11:19):
green screen room. Now, we'll spend most of the budget
on the on the rendering for the computers, and for
the promotion of it. We're gonna spend more money shilling
this on the TV, you know, on commercials.

Speaker 2 (01:11:33):
Then of course the Hobbit Village is still in New Zealand.
It's a big tourist attraction. We saw this thing on.

Speaker 3 (01:11:38):
I imagine Lord of the Rings is the best thing
to ever happened for New Zealand Storism board.

Speaker 2 (01:11:41):
Yeah, we saw this clip that came up shortly. You know,
we have at night we'll kind of watch like a
ten minute video or something of of just kind of
unusual things that people put together. And so one of
them was this clip. Couple was getting married at the
Hobbit Village and Elijah Wood was there and he comes up.
I guess then they get their picture taken with it,

(01:12:02):
and he was actually pretty short.

Speaker 3 (01:12:04):
Fra Baggins.

Speaker 2 (01:12:06):
Yeah, but anyway, you know so, I mean the real
stuff is still there, so you.

Speaker 3 (01:12:10):
Got it again. New Zealand must be. They must have
someone out there daily taking care of it, polishing it,
making sure it stays in good condition. I imagine Lord
of the Rings nerds are a significant portion of New
Zealand's GDP. I'd go just to see it. I mean,
I'll never make it to New Zealand, but I would
if I could.

Speaker 2 (01:12:29):
It's a long trip.

Speaker 3 (01:12:30):
It's a long trip, quite expensive, beautiful beautiful country. See
why don't why don't we take over New Zealand. I
doubt that even fight back, we could do that. We
could make it. The fifty first.

Speaker 2 (01:12:39):
State billionaires are taking him over.

Speaker 3 (01:12:42):
Kick them out.

Speaker 2 (01:12:43):
They want to get down there just in case there
is a nuclear war. They feel like that's going to
be a little bit safe. Give them a little bit
more time.

Speaker 3 (01:12:49):
I guess I'm going to show up in New Zealand
with one singular gun and no one can stop me.
Give me all your Kiwi's Karen Carpenter twenty seven says
Gaba pentin is also being widely prescribed for pets as well.
I'm bad, not gonna, not gonna be giving him to
any our pets, n Max. In fact, most doctors tell
you they are rare and not to worry. Talking about
the side effects. They always down to, well, these these happen,

(01:13:12):
but they're very rare. They're not very common at all.
It's you know, it's one in a thousand.

Speaker 2 (01:13:17):
Lance was injured with that floora chlor quinn, whatever the
thing was. Anyway, the antibiotic love of floxis.

Speaker 3 (01:13:25):
In yeah love. Yeah, It's like cipro.

Speaker 2 (01:13:27):
That whole family of antibiotics, and I went back and
talked to the pharmacists because they did not tell them.
They not give him a warning about that.

Speaker 6 (01:13:37):
Yeah, I wasn't told that the side effects were rare.
I wasn't told that the side effects at all. It
was just told specifically, make sure you take the full
course of antibiotics.

Speaker 2 (01:13:45):
It has a black box warning, and the physician is
supposed to tell you. The pharmacist is supposed to tell you.
The black box warning, however, is typically not conveyed to people,
and so it just becomes a liability and if you will,
for the pharmaceutical companies and for the FDA, so they
protect themselves by putting a black box. Lave want it,

(01:14:06):
but then when the physicians and the pharmacists are there,
they don't tell you about it. And his response was, well,
you know you can. You can get too much water
and it can harm you. This is not water that
you're dispensing. It just disgusts me to see that kind
of stuff.

Speaker 7 (01:14:21):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:14:22):
Star Barkley says a lot of people have embraced Christianity
after seeing the peace, People like Grace's family have They say,
I want that.

Speaker 2 (01:14:29):
I true.

Speaker 3 (01:14:30):
I agree, that's true. Because I mean, even as someone
who is a Christian, I don't know if I be
able to exemplify that kind of peace and calm under
those circumstances. And he's handled it exactly right.

Speaker 2 (01:14:43):
You know. He hasn't just said, oh well it doesn't matter. No,
he is trying to do something, do something for her memory,
also do something to help his fellow citizens that are
out there that are also you know, exposed to the
same type of system.

Speaker 3 (01:14:57):
He's fighting it, but he's staying calm in our articulate,
and he's still being kind. Like even when he's talked
about the doctors who did it, he's never flown off
the handle or called them names or anything which I
could not do. I'll freely admit I could not.

Speaker 2 (01:15:12):
Say I can't do that either. I just illustrated.

Speaker 3 (01:15:15):
I would be ranting and raving. I'd be screaming. I'd
be outside their homes, I'd be in their walls. Big
brit is back again. It says mom Donnie got funded
by Jihan groups.

Speaker 2 (01:15:25):
Wow, and well, you know, and part of it they
were saying, look at this, look at all the money
they got from cutter and it's like okay, well, so
did Trump, and so did Jerry Kushner, and so I mean,
this is a look at the you know the plane
that they're giving was it UAE I think gave. I
believe it's the UK that plane. But yeah, they're all
in the pockets of all kinds of special interests.

Speaker 3 (01:15:46):
My friend, I fund all sides, no matter who wins,
I win. Right.

Speaker 2 (01:15:50):
They take money from the Israelis, they take money from
the Arabs, they take money from everybody, the technocrats, you
name it. They're owned by everybody. They should be wearing.
There's sponsors on their suit. Like a NASCAR driver.

Speaker 3 (01:16:04):
If you got enough money and a position, I'll hill it.
Hi Boos says, See how the lesser of evil goes.
Now we have to vote for dims because they are
better than Muslims. What a time to be alive. The
North American Caliphate coming soon, Christian constitutional conservative Trump keeps
up his crap, twenty twenty six will be a blue

(01:16:24):
tidle wave. Yesterday it was just a harbinger.

Speaker 2 (01:16:27):
Well, it's right.

Speaker 3 (01:16:28):
I hate to be a nitpicker, but most tidal waves
are blue since they're made out of water.

Speaker 2 (01:16:33):
But it is, it's going to be. I mean, they
don't realize that they're whistling in the dark and they're
fooling themselves because they want to tell everybody when you
see this massive energized demonstration against Trump, well it doesn't matter,
or just old boomers and what world? Guess what? Old
boomers very active politically. They've got money and they've got time,

(01:16:53):
and they get active, and so you know, they're just
they really don't want to admit what is coming, and
they don't want to push back on Trump. Even if
they know that what Trump is doing is wrong, they
want to pose him on it, even if it violates
their their policies. I won't say principles because I don't
think they've got any.

Speaker 3 (01:17:12):
But Big brit is back again. So a choice between
a murderer or a terrorist? Oh boy, I can't wait.
Let me vote right now, please please. I love, I
love the political system. I love being involved. Makes you
feel so good when I vote.

Speaker 2 (01:17:32):
Yeah, I think bulldog is right. You know, you may
not have a it may not. I don't know what
is tariff against New Yorkers means, but New York City
could have exit taxes absolutely.

Speaker 3 (01:17:44):
That's what. Yeah, that's a bulldog predicts And why I
see exit taxes coming. Loll Yeah, you better get out
before he takes off his get out while the getting
is good. Evacuate.

Speaker 6 (01:17:54):
Yeah, you still got a couple of months you can
before they put the wall up.

Speaker 2 (01:17:58):
Yeah, you still got a couple of months before they
swear him in.

Speaker 3 (01:18:01):
Better, better take the chance you have. Ratis bros. Is
pretty sure it was the illegal and immigrant vote. But
we don't even have real elections, so what's it matter. Yeah,
that's right now, Brian and Deb McCartney says, Damn mommy.

Speaker 6 (01:18:17):
Damn mommy is what you can call him when he
institutes the government childcare.

Speaker 3 (01:18:21):
So yeah, on the upside, you know, escape from New
York becomes more real every day. I can't wait to
meet Snake pluskin.

Speaker 2 (01:18:33):
Okay, we're gonna take a quick break, folks, and when
we come back, we're going to talk about Trump's doing
the taco dance again, now this time about the shutdown
and the snap stuff. And this is again, you put.

Speaker 3 (01:18:45):
This tariff fall, you take the tariff fall.

Speaker 2 (01:18:48):
This is just he can't make up his mind about anything,
and the way that he does all this stuff is
the worst aspect. We'll be right back.

Speaker 7 (01:20:32):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 3 (01:20:36):
Wait a minute, where am I sorry, Jefferson.

Speaker 10 (01:20:40):
The scoundrels who put America on Central Bank fiat currency
used our heads on their coins as some sort of trophy. Despicable.

Speaker 11 (01:20:48):
This is outrageous, Washington. I spent my life fighting centralized power.
Now the Federal Reserve monopoly parades us around on their
monopoly money. Tell me there's good news to all this.

Speaker 10 (01:21:02):
Well, there is a coin they can't control, one that
isn't backed by the FED, but backed by the fed
up the All New David Knight Show Commemorative Coin. Now
patriots can support a show that won't sell out with
a limited edition coin that's sure to sell out quickly.

Speaker 11 (01:21:17):
They say, money talks, and this coin has something worth
listening to. The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.

Speaker 8 (01:21:34):
Whether you're feeling like the booze where or bluegrass, APS
Radio has you covered, check out a wide variety of
channels on our app at apsradio dot com.

Speaker 2 (01:21:49):
All right, welcome back, and I want to talk a
little bit about what's going on with the shutdown because
it just keeps morphing. It's kind of like Trump's tariffs.
He keeps changing it one way after the other. Now
he is vowing to a whole snap benefits until government
is reopening, and so it's on and off, on and off,
just like the tariffs.

Speaker 3 (01:22:07):
First, he's not.

Speaker 2 (01:22:07):
Going to do it, he says, because unlike everything else
that he sees, it's not an emergency.

Speaker 3 (01:22:15):
Wait a minute.

Speaker 2 (01:22:18):
You've got a lot of people who have been put
on this for decades and allowed to be put on here,
incentivized to do this, just as they have set up
the open trade system, and he wants to rip that
out all at once, and especially considering the fact that
there are some people who really need it and really
depend on it, especially children. And so he says, now,

(01:22:40):
I'm not going to do anything about that. By the way,
have you seen my new ballroom. That's one of the
reasons we saw the kind of election results we did yesterday.

Speaker 3 (01:22:48):
He was in that because for years presidents haven't had balls.
So that's right.

Speaker 2 (01:22:54):
So now you know, they sue him, and he's had
two judges say no, it's actually in the law. This
is the kind of emergency that we have these reserve
funds for, and you need to release them. And then
he says, okay, well, I'll do it partially, you know,
until we run out of funds with that or something.
Now he's coming back. This is position number four he's had.

(01:23:16):
Now I'm going to withhold it and I'm going to
use it as leverage to get the Democrats to come
back in. And so that's what the people are looking at.
They're saying, you know, he's weaponizing this against this because
he has no concern for the people who are on this.
And again, not everybody that's on it is gaining this system.

(01:23:38):
Trump warned on Tuesday that he will not allow federal
food benefits to be paid until the government reopens, and
he's taken a hardened position that puts millions of low
income households directly in the political blast zone. To federal
courts only last week ruled the administration must pay the
SNAP program at least partially. A SNAP is something's being

(01:24:01):
used by forty two million Americans. The majority of people
on it are children and people over sixty. So Tromponese
complaining about this and says, well, these were haphazardly handed
to anyone for the asking, as opposed to just those
in need. Well, when he makes a statement like that,

(01:24:24):
he is admitting that there are some people who actually
are in need and he's going to throw them under
the bus for this. Again, I don't like the welfare
system because I don't think it serves the people on
it very well. I think it is counterproductive for them,
and I think there's other ways that they should be helped,
but I think they should be helped. And to do
this all of a sudden and just to throw these

(01:24:46):
people out the door while he is ingratiating himself with
billionaires for his own particular projects, is just the height
of bad optics. If nothing else, if it doesn't show
his callousness.

Speaker 3 (01:24:59):
I mean, as Christian, we are called to help the idiot.
It's supposed to be our duty. We're not supposed to
pawn this off under the government. It's a mechanistic force
that happens. We're called to be involved in it, and
it really is a blessing to you when you're able
to give. I'm not saying I've got a ton of
experience in it, and I'm not some big philanthropists that don't.

Speaker 2 (01:25:18):
Many people will say it has the attitude in a
sense that, oh I gave it the office type of thing.

Speaker 3 (01:25:22):
Right now, they're already taking it out of my paycheck.

Speaker 2 (01:25:25):
Yeah exactly. But I don't have any more. The government's
going to take care of the thing what I should
be doing for my fellow man. I don't have to
worry about it.

Speaker 3 (01:25:34):
It can also be extremely helpful to see how much
of a hold the money has on you, you know, when
you are actually actively the person who is dispensing it
and parting with it. It really does show you, you know,
how much value you're placing on it, And it can
be a really good and helpful thing to see, Oh,
I'm too attached to this. I'm placing too much value

(01:25:59):
on the amount of value I have. And it's just
it is a blessing to be able to give, and
the government, through taxation is kind of stealing that from you.
That's right, not just stealing the physical thing.

Speaker 2 (01:26:14):
That's right. So if this happens what he's now saying,
it'll be the first time that a government shutdown has
disrupted the flow of Snap payments. The program is one
of the few cross partisan anti poverty lifelines that until now,
has been immunized against the effects of shutdowns. Yet Trump,
while telegraphing that the legal rulings will not stand in

(01:26:36):
his way, is indicating that he intends to tie food
support to his fight with the Congressional Democrats in a
bid to force a concession amid the current standoff. The
White House has not yet addressed the contradiction because Trump's
declaration and the court orders are already in place. Again,
it is a stupid policy from a political standpoint, regardless

(01:26:59):
of what you think about these various programs. It is
tone deaf and he is absolutely blind to what it's
going on. As a matter of fact, the people who
pose him are quick to jump on this Lincoln project
that has always opposed Trump from the very beginning. Goes
back with a commercial saying Trump was right about the shutdowns.
Listen to what Trump said in the past about the

(01:27:22):
president's responsibility during a shutdown. So it's not often, but
sometimes Donald Trump is right.

Speaker 12 (01:27:30):
If there is a shutdown, I think it would be
a tremendously negative mark on the president of the United States.

Speaker 13 (01:27:36):
He's the one that has to get people together. The
president's the leader, and he's got to get everybody in
a room. But he's got to lead in twenty five
years of fifty years or one hundred years from now,
when they talk about the government shutdown, they're going to
be talking about the President of the United States with Congress.

Speaker 12 (01:27:52):
You have to get everybody in a room and you
have to get him to agree.

Speaker 13 (01:27:56):
You have to get people in, grab them, hug them,
kiss them, and get the deal done.

Speaker 2 (01:28:05):
Instead we agree, Nonald Well. Of course, the other thing
you can do is you can threaten to hurt the
poor people out there that ought to work. Right, I'm
going to believe these people are on food stamps or whatever.
So CNN anchor called out Mike Johnson because he always
gives the same answer when somebody asked him something crazy
about Donald Trump. Here's what he always says. I don't know.

Speaker 14 (01:28:28):
Anything about that. I didn't see the interview. You have
to ask the president about that. I don't know any
of the details of that yet. I just heard about that,
literally I was walking in. I don't know the details
about that. I've just read it. I didn't talk with
him about that. I don't know the latest developments, but
I've first heard of that.

Speaker 2 (01:28:42):
I know anything about it.

Speaker 3 (01:28:43):
I don't I know nothing that's right, and.

Speaker 14 (01:28:46):
I haven't seen that, So I'm not going to comment
on it.

Speaker 3 (01:28:48):
I know nothing.

Speaker 2 (01:28:52):
Absolutely.

Speaker 3 (01:28:54):
I had seen that clip.

Speaker 2 (01:28:55):
Yeah, Trump's repeated insistence that he doesn't know any thing
about the pardon of the Binance co founder they call
him CZ because his name is Chang Ping Zau. He
pardoned him. And so he's asked by this sixty minutes interview,
do you know one thing we don't have about Joe Biden,

(01:29:19):
said Democrat Muskowitz. He says, we don't have him on
camera being asked a question do you know about the pardon?
And Joe Biden going no, I know nothing about it.
He says, we got Trump. We got Trump right here
for the American people to see. He's going, no, no,
I don't know this guy Zau. I don't know anything
at all about it. And Scott Jennings, who's part of

(01:29:41):
the panel, said it's true, you don't have Joe Biden
on camera about much of anything in the last three months.
And then another one says that, well, you made a
point about Mike Johnson, because this has become a common
refrain for him. He's asked about something that Trump says,
and it's all over the news, and apparently the news
doesn't get to him. They played in that clip that
I just played for you. So legal experts are mocking

(01:30:06):
Trump's Department of Justice over his latest move and again
his vendetta against Comy and some of the other people
like Letitia James. I think Letitia James is a crook,
and I don't support these people either. However, what he's
doing is not going to stick for a number of reasons.

(01:30:29):
First of all, because, as I point out before, the
reasons that James Comey was fired are some of the
same reasons that they are not going to be able
to succeed in this prosecution. When they go back and
look at the statements that were made when they fired him.
It's a big problem. But then they also have another issue,

(01:30:50):
and that is that Trump kind of hastily put in
his personal attorney, Lindsay Halligan, someone with no experience in
prosecututions whatsoever. You put her in at the last minute
because they were up against the clock in terms of
a statute of limitations on these charges, and he wanted
to get this stuff out and Pam Bondi was not

(01:31:13):
moving quickly enough or she couldn't find charges on people.
That's one of the things they've been saying. He wanted
to get Adam Shift, but they couldn't find any criminal
charges on him. So again it's like bring me the man,
let's find the crime, that kind of thing, and they
couldn't find charges against him. I don't agree with Adam
Schiff on anything, but they were having trouble still finding

(01:31:35):
charges against him. But they came up with a couple
of things for James Comy and for Latitia James. They
put these people's real estate records through the ringer and
order an AI to search out everything they'd ever done.
And again, she may have lied on these things that
it depends on your interpretation of whether it was for

(01:31:59):
personal use or not had a relative who was staying
in it and not paying rent. So you can't necessarily
say that she lied so she could get rent free property.
You could say that. I think about the woman who
was who he came after with the Federal Reserve, one
of the Board of Governors people, Lisa what was her name,
Lisa Cook or something. I thinks anyway, you know, you

(01:32:21):
could make the case that she lied and then said
it was for personal use when it's going to be
for income property and she got a favorable more favorable
rate with that. But I don't know about Letitia James
on that particular charge. Anyway, he wants to move quickly,
so he puts in somebody who has no experience as
a prosecutor, because the prosecutors are saying, I'm not going

(01:32:42):
to do this, it's too flimsy in evidence, and so
he put her in right away. And it turns out
that she has to be appointed by Pam Bondy, and
they realized that Pam Bondy had not done that. Pam
Bondy actually opposed her appointment, and so that creates a
legal technicality for them to push back on this. The

(01:33:04):
Apartment of Justice on Monday submitted a filing in the
cases of James Come and Letitia James defending the appointment
of interim US Attorney Lisa Halligan Lindsay Helligan. But multiple attorneys, professors,
and journalists are blasting the DOJ in what they view
as a last ditch effort to keep Halligan in her role.

(01:33:25):
Attorney General Pam Bondi claimed to have quote retroactively appointed
former Trump attorney Lindsay Helligan as a quote special attorney
unquote for DOJ and has quote ratified all of her
actions to date so she bonafide or not, including her

(01:33:45):
presentations to the Grand Juries that indicted Trump's enemies. Legal
journalist Chris Geider posted the DOJ filing in the appointment,
while equipping that Bondy has dressed up as a lawyer
on Halloween. Evidently, time travel is now one of the
Trump administration's powers, said, because the retroactive appointment, so he said,

(01:34:10):
we still have no clue how Pam Bondy can legally
go back in time and appoint Halligan to a position
as of six weeks ago. Realizing that the appointment of
Lindsay Halligan is fatally flawed, Pam Bondy engages in some
quick steps to try to salvage things. Will it work? Well,
it shouldn't. Actually. She was installed to replace former interim

(01:34:31):
US Attorney Eric Siebert, who was forced out of his
role after declining to bring charges against Komy and James.
Conservative attorney George Conway argued last month that Halligan's appointment
was not lawful according to the federal statute that governs
juis attorney's vacancies, and that therefore her indictments of Komy

(01:34:52):
and James should be thrown out and they cannot read.
If that happens, they cannot be refiled because of the times.
So that's going to be the next thing that is
going to get Trump angry.

Speaker 3 (01:35:04):
This is your four D chess master right away.

Speaker 2 (01:35:08):
That's right. This is there screw up. We really need
to talk about ratification, run another lawyer. The administration keeps
thinking that it can take garbage decisions made with no
authority and somehow retroactively cleaned them up. This is not
how anything can possibly work. At some point, the courts
really need to start holding the DOJ in contempt with

(01:35:29):
real consequences, said a neuroscientist. He says, as long as
we're making up new rules and new powers for ourselves,
I hereby retroactively unappoint Bondie and de ratify everything that
she has done in office, said the individual. So the
Trump administration is redirecting tariff revenue, they said, in order

(01:35:52):
to fund the WICK program, the Women and Infants and
Children food program as a shutdown is dragging on. So
again we keep all this stuff. Are they going to
fund it or are they're not going to fund it?
Now you have Caroline Lovett comes out and says, well,
we've transferred four hundred and fifty million dollars from the
tariff windfalls to a nutrition program for women, infants, and children.

(01:36:15):
And so the question is if this is coming out.
It's taken from a fund for agricultural commodity and disaster aid,
which is exactly what they said they would not do
for the other stuff. And so that's really where it's
coming from. And then Caroline Lovett says that it's coming
from tariffs. As a matter of fact, when she's talking

(01:36:37):
about the tariff revenue, she had this to say, in
terms of tariff revenue, this is this is her right.

Speaker 15 (01:36:46):
Here, anchre In fact, this year alone, we are going
to cut the deficit by six hundred billion dollars, namely
because of the President's effective use of terriffs. And the
President strongly believes that economic security is a matter of
national security and tariffs have a lot to do with that.
And this case is not just about President Trump. It's

(01:37:07):
about the use of this emergency authorization for tariffs for
future presidents and administrations to come. And we're confident and
hopeful that the Supreme Court will do the right thing.

Speaker 2 (01:37:17):
Yeah, so future presidents to come, including Democrats, we'll just
be able to impose tariffs. And I said, well, and
when you look at this, this is why I call
them Democrats, because they're constantly bragging it. Look at all
the new tax revenue we've got, right, how's that going
to roll out? Well, we know that eventually it is
going to be passed on to consumers. It's always been

(01:37:39):
an understanding of people and the Republican Party who are
paying any attention, that you can't tax corporations because the
corporation is either going to pass that tax on or
it's going to go to business. And so it might
be in an industry where they have huge profit margins,
but that's typically not the case because of competition. And

(01:38:00):
so if you don't have, you know, competition in your country,
you're going to wind up a competition another country is
going to put.

Speaker 3 (01:38:07):
You out of business.

Speaker 2 (01:38:08):
The bottom line is that these terriffs are taxes, and
they're going to be paid by US. So six hundred
billion dollars, they say, is that supposed to be a
feature or is.

Speaker 3 (01:38:18):
That a bug?

Speaker 2 (01:38:19):
I went back and I looked at the biggest tax
increases that we've ever had in America. The biggest one
was from a Democrat by the name of FDR. Surprise, surprise.
What he did was he had a in nineteen forty two,
the Revenue Act of nineteen forty two, which was basically
done on income tax. He raised income tax rates to

(01:38:42):
seventy five percent for workers and to eighty eight percent
for people who were investors. That brought in ten billion dollars.
That was in nineteen forty two. But of course, since
our government is spending so much money and printing so
much money, they have monetized a debt and they have

(01:39:02):
demonetized the dollar to the extent that today that ten
billion dollar record revenue that the government got in nineteen
forty two, it would now be equivalent to two hundred billion,
twenty times more because that's how much they've taken away
ninety five percent the value of the dollar since nineteen
forty two, so that would be two hundred billion. Think

(01:39:24):
about what she just said. She's bragging about the fact
that they have raised taxes by three times the amount
that FDR dead. Except with a Trump administration, they're not
doing it on the individuals. They are doing it in
a way to try to hide it from you. They're
doing it through the corporations and everybody's going to look
at this and say, why is the price of everything

(01:39:46):
going up? Well, because it will go up. There's a
delay right now. As I point out, studies have gone
through and looked at the tariffs are put on by
Trump in its previous administration, and they found out there
was several month delay when they were finally imposed, and
of course there's been several months of haggling back and
forth by the Trump administration. Finally when he puts them

(01:40:07):
on and they start to collect the revenue, the money
that you know, the charges are going to be passed on,
but there'll be a delay, and they'll also be a
delay when they take this stuff off, if they ever do.
That's what they found. And so again, is this supposed
to be a good thing to raise taxes three times
more than FDR did. That's what she's bragging about. That's

(01:40:30):
why I call them democrats. I mean, they're democrats, are socialists,
they're central planners, and they're harming the economy. They're harming
businesses with their indecision. But the magnitude of taxes that
they put on, you should pay attention to that because
this is going to have big, big consequences. And so
let me get back to the original article here. So

(01:40:52):
six hundred billion, we're proud of that, but just think
about the fact that they've got If they've got a
six hundred billion dollar windfall, they're only going to give
four hundred and fifty million for women, infants, and children.
So on the one hand, they want to tell us
that they're flush with cash because of the tariffs, and that's
a good thing. That they have pulled that money out

(01:41:14):
of the productive economy and put it in the possession
of politicians. That's never a good thing. But they've got
this big chest of six hundred billion dollars in tariffs
free money, but they're not going to use any of
that for the women, infants, and children. This is why
I say they are digging their own grave with all
this stuff. They'll use less than one thousand of less

(01:41:37):
than one tenth of one percent they will give to
feed children. The administration revealed on Monday that it would
use emergency funds in part to pay for November's snap benefits.
But then the very next day, Trump says, no, I'm
going to hold that back, even though it's in the law,
even though the judges two different judges have said it's

(01:41:58):
in the law, and you've got to pay it. He says, no,
I'm going to hold that back and I'm going to
use the kids food money, their lunch money. I'm going
to use that as a leverage against the Democrats.

Speaker 3 (01:42:11):
Those are some nice kids. You got there, be seen
or something would have happened to them, like they go
hungry at lunch time. Be real shame that that would
have happened.

Speaker 2 (01:42:20):
That's right. So two federal judges on Friday ruled that
the USDA is required to tap emergency funds to disperse
food stamps, dismissing the agency's claims that does not have
enough resources. So again she's she's bragging about the fact
they've got six hundred billion dollars in tariffs that are there,

(01:42:42):
and they're going to give zero point one percent of
that Less than that, that'd be six hundred million if
they were to give it one tenth of a percent.
So they're not even going to give one tenth of
one percent to the kids for food if they're breaking
about that, And they're also saying it's not an emergency
when everything is an emergency. For Trump, judges highlighted six

(01:43:04):
billion dollars in congressionally appointed appropriated contingency reserves, such as
a three billion dollar earmarked through fiscal twenty twenty six.
They could be used to cover benefits, negating USDA memos
that suggested the funds could not be used amid a
government shutdown. So again, this is a memo from a

(01:43:24):
bureaucracy that is under Trump. It's Brook Rawlins again, the
same one who by a memo said we're going to
inject all the chickens with mRNA and all the beef
and all the pork as well. So she also says
that she's not going to let kids have food either
with a memo, and they're saying, well, that's actually in

(01:43:45):
the law, but they're not going to do it, and
they don't realize the real political issues that they're going
to bring up with all this stuff. So it truly
is amazing when we look at the Trump administration shooting
themselves in the foot.

Speaker 3 (01:44:02):
Well, when you wear clown shoes that big, it's a
large target. We've got a comment here. Pro human says,
as a New Yorker, I'd like to say everyone has
fun crapping on us, but there are a few dgay
supporters here. Maybe it doesn't, and visiting once or twice
doesn't make you an expert. Politics isn't everything. I apologize
if I come across too harsh. I don't take anything
too seriously. I like to make fun of just about everything.

(01:44:25):
And I want you to love where you're from. If
you're from New York, I want you to think New
York is the best city on the planet. I want
you to love it like where I love. I love
the town I live in. I want the Nigerian to
love Nigeria. I want the Chinese to love China. That's
just how it is. Like I want like friendly rivalry.
Like you can make fun of where I'm from, I'll
make fun of where you're from. Just don't take it

(01:44:47):
too seriously. I hope you love New York. I hope
you love New York City, and I will. I know
you want the best for it. That's just where That's
just how I feel about things, Like I like a
little bit of bullying some you know, making fun of things.

Speaker 2 (01:45:00):
Farm living a life for me exact and spreading out
so far.

Speaker 6 (01:45:05):
And of course, loving New York kind of includes hating
the government that rules.

Speaker 2 (01:45:09):
It, especially I know a lot of people in New
York who do hate the government that rules it. That's there,
But that's one of the key things. It's just the
traffic and the congestion and the government that is making
everything ingested the rest of your life.

Speaker 3 (01:45:25):
That's there. Well, we're going to take a quick break
and we come back. We're going to take a look
at some bubbles.

Speaker 2 (01:45:29):
And we've got the guy who was the trader behind
the big short and he is now sounding the alarm
as to what he thinks is going to happen with
artificial intelligence, so maybe we should pay special attention to him.
And we've got Mark Zuckerberg, not Mark Zuckerberg's Sam Altman,
who himself was talking about how well, maybe the whole

(01:45:53):
thing is overpriced and he was called out about that
on a podcast and he absolutely lost it.

Speaker 5 (01:45:59):
We'll be right back to.

Speaker 16 (01:47:06):
Analyzing the globalists next move, and now the deevid Nut Show.

Speaker 8 (01:47:24):
Whether you're feeling like the booze, where or bluegrass? APS
Radio has you covered? Check out a wide variety of
channels on our app at apsradio dot com.

Speaker 3 (01:47:38):
Welcome back, folks, And before we get into more news
real quickly, I do want to remind you Homestead Products
dot shop has popcorn kernels now their organic, their high quality.
You pop them yourself. You get to add your own spice,
as your own seasoning, as your own real butter, not
the fake garbage they put on it at the movie
theaters or in the pastages. So if you want high

(01:48:01):
quality popcorn, if you want a tasty snack, you can
go to Homestead Products dot shop and get some of
their new popcorn there. And of course they have all
kinds of other products as well. It's not limited to
just popcorn. You can get some freeze dried eggs if
you're looking for survival food.

Speaker 2 (01:48:18):
And of course this is now the time that people
should be getting some popcorn because we live in interesting times. Again,
it's out there pop some of the stuffhile you're watching
what is really going wondering where it's going to go next,
because it is very entertaining, isn't it, you know, even
though it's very concerning.

Speaker 3 (01:48:34):
Speaking of interesting times, you can also go to Jackloss
and Books dot com to get your hands on the
Civil Defense Manuals Volume one and two. They're both very large.
They've got a lot of information and at uncertain times,
these can help you prepare. You want to have a
hard copy if the grid goes down. You don't want
to be sitting there trying to google how do I

(01:48:56):
Not Die? You prefer to have that on hand, So
go to Jacklowsonbooks dot com, check on the Civil Defense Manual,
and lastly get a Davidnight dot news and check out
all the ways you can directly support the show, whether
it's subscribe star dot com, forward slash the David Night Show,
where we have a lot of different tiers that you
can choose from if one fits your budget, or a

(01:49:17):
cash app you can send money directly zell or a
check in the mail. We have the po box listed
it is David Knight pobox nine nine four codek Tennessee
three seven seven sixty four. It is because of your
support that we're able to continue the show, and we
really do appreciate all the people who support us.

Speaker 2 (01:49:35):
And of course you can if you're a subscribe Star supporter,
you get the show without any the audio podcast of
the show without any commercials, and you can do that
now at subscribe Star. If you want to, you can substack, Yeah, substant.

Speaker 3 (01:49:49):
Substack they get it without commercials as well. Subscribe Star
they also get a full list of the articles that
we cover on the show. I try to get it
up daily. Sometimes it ends up being a day late.
With the little Guy, he takes up a lot of time,
but as a general rule, it's daily. You get the
full list and you get links to the full show

(01:50:12):
as well. Well.

Speaker 2 (01:50:13):
As everybody's talking about Mom Danny and the economic havoc
that they think he's going to unleash on New York.
Just think about the economic havoc that has been leashed
on this for the last five years, beginning with the
lockdown and the mass of trillions of dollars that put
in there with stimulus checking. As Thomas Massey pointed out,
that was going to have a cumulative effect, and we're

(01:50:35):
now seeing that in terms of the rapid acceleration of
debt because the precedent that was set by Trump was
followed up with by Biden. You can look at the
rate of the accumulation of the US debt and it
was going up at a particular slope, and then when
Trump did that in twenty twenty, put a whole new
slope on it and started going up much more rapidly,

(01:50:56):
and Biden maintained that same rate of growth throughout his regime.
And so when you're looking again, you know, talking about
the Civil Defense Manual, it's not the things that they're
talking about Mom Danny doing are not sustainable and they're
crazy policies, but it's nothing compared to the kinds of

(01:51:18):
things that have been that the land mines that have
been laid by Trump administration going back to twenty twenty,
and all the stuff of the pandemic. We leave the
commercial real estate issue for example, that Gerald Slenty has
talked about so much. That's really big in the big
cities like New York, but it's going to affect a
lot of people in a lot of different ways. And
of course the stock market crashing is going to have

(01:51:39):
a huge impact as well. We don't know when that's
going to happen, but we now know that Michael Burry
is betting that it's going to happen soon because he
has taken out now futures shortening the AI stocks, specifically
in Nvidia and pallant here, and he has his short

(01:52:00):
so really focused more on polland here than anything else.
But it all is part of the AI bubble that
has been oversold and many people even people in the
AI industry have been talking about that because and warning
people about it. But Michael Berry, if you've seen the
movie or read the book The Big Short, very interesting,

(01:52:22):
very interesting book. He was a person who was played
by what is his name, Christian Bale, Yeah, Christian Bale
played it. Very interesting to go back and look at that.
And he was one of two or three people who
saw it coming and made a lot of money betting
against it. Because Wall Street is a casino, these are

(01:52:45):
people who bet on this game. Here he wagered, and
that's the right word to use. A casino like the
stock market. He's now wagered one point one billion dollars
that shares are going to fall dramatically for and Pallanteer.
The move will intensify concerns about a possible bubble in
AI stocks following a surge and values driven by hope

(01:53:09):
of a huge future earnings from this sector. Last week,
mister Burry returned to x for the first time since
April of twenty twenty three to post warnings about a bubble.
Last Thursday, he posted a picture of Christian Bale, who
played him in the movie The Big Short, and he said,
sometimes we see bubbles, sometimes there is something to do

(01:53:32):
about it, and sometimes the only winning move is not
to play. But he's not just simply getting out of
the market like Warren Buffett did. He is playing. And
what he's doing is he's placed a massive bet a
billion dollars that it's going to happen sometime soon. Because
these contracts typically go out. I don't know how far

(01:53:55):
it goes out, but the shorts usually only last for
a few months. I think I've never done it self.
But again, it's about eighty four percent of the billion
dollars is placed against ballot here about sixteen percent against Nvidia.
He also bought call options betting on Halliburton and Pfizer,

(01:54:16):
and so again he thinks that they're going to go up.
So he is doing the puts and calls betting that
the socks are going to go up or down. He
now believes that there is an AI bubble which is
due to pop and due to pop soon. Burry rose
to prominence after protecting the collapse of America's mortgage backed

(01:54:36):
securities market, which triggered the global financial crisis. In two
thousand and seven, he made what was then a controversial
long term billion dollar bet stating in two thousand and five,
I'm sorry. Starting in two thousand and five against US
mortgage market, the wager eventually increased the value of his
fund by four hundred and eighty nine percent. It's about

(01:54:59):
five times when the system collapsed. The story was detailed
in the twenty ten book The Big Short, and then
five years later a film, The Big Short, and his
role was played by Christian Bale. Last week, and Video
became the first publicly traded company in the world to
surpass five trillion dollars in value, making it worth more

(01:55:24):
than the total GDP of Germany. Of Germany, Pallenteer, an
AI data analysis company, has also been identified as a
winner from a rapid increase in the use of technology.
Its stock has risen by four hundred percent over the
last year. So again, even though Palenteer's primary customer is

(01:55:46):
not market based and doesn't really need to see any
immediate payback of anything because they sell everything to the
government pretty much, so that kind of insulates them any
kind of market reality. Nevertheless, when their stock goes up
by four hundred percent, as Mit pointed out that the

(01:56:08):
vast majority of AI investments were yielding zero return for businesses.
But again the government doesn't care about that. And the
real killer app for AI is to kill people and
to surveil them and to control them, and that's what
the government wants from this stuff. Even Steve Altman of
Open Ai said, our investors over excited in my opinion, Yes,

(01:56:31):
he said, and he thinks that they've overbought as well.
So again, Michael Burr's a billion dollar bet is eighty
percent of his fund that he's put in there. So
he's going really big on all this stuff, and it
is a bet that the AI industry bubble is about

(01:56:55):
to burst. This article from The Verge says the AI
industry is running on fear of missing out on earnings calls.
Last week, Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and Meta reported more than
three hundred and fifty billion dollars this year on capital expenditures.
All four of them told investors to expect the numbers

(01:57:15):
to skyrocket even further next year. Microsoft said higher, Amazon
said an increase, Google said a significant increase, and Meta
said notably larger. And so people are starting to look
at it and say, but even you guys are not
making that much money to justify this. Some investors are
asking the same questions, and brad Gersner, an open ai

(01:57:39):
investor and a CEO of Altimeter Capital, asked open AI's
CEO Sam Altman in his podcast on Friday, how a
company with thirteen billion in revenue can make a one
point four trillion dollar spending commitment, so one hundred times
more than they're making right on an annual basis. So

(01:58:03):
you've got to believe that their revenue is going to explode,
because otherwise it would take them one hundred years to
pay for this stuff. I don't know what the carrying
charges will be on credit card anyway. Now. Though agents
from open Ai, Google and others are in users' hands.
Though the companies promise that they will steadily improve at
automating kedious tasks, they're not taking the world by storm

(01:58:27):
in their current state. Some investors seemed wary about whether
there is a coherent plan at all. Meta made headlines
in twenty twenty five for spending billions to lure AI
engineers and researchers away from competitors for its brand new
super intelligence team, then announced internal restructuring and layoffs soon after.
And I've seen this type of thing as well too

(01:58:48):
when I worked at TI. They would go through hiring binges,
and then they'd go through periods of time whe their
fire everybody, and then repeat that over and over again.
It's like, what is going on this thing? I mean,
when I first went there, I remember they flewest in
as recent college graduates, and you could tell everybody was
about the same age. And you know, we'd all just

(01:59:11):
graduated from college, and we're all staying in the same
hotel and we've all got the same rental car. It
was really kind of humorous. So we all get in
the car at the same time and we're all looking
under line almost going to Texas Instruments Interview. And then
it wasn't but just a couple of years later, they
were firing everybody and it was crazy, But that's what
these companies do anyway. Meta's AI initiative comes on the

(01:59:33):
heels of a quixotic quest for the virtual reality Metaverse,
in which it is so far spent and lost tens
of billions of dollars to its Reality Labs division. And
so people are looking at this and saying, well, maybe
they don't know, maybe they're not as smart as they
want everybody to think that they are. But as I
pointed out before Sam Altman was in this podcast, and

(01:59:54):
he lost his school when he was asked about the
small revenue compared to what they are planning to spend.
And so this guy, Brad Gersner, when he asked him,
Altman lost to school when he was asked outright, how
does this all add up? You got revenues of thirteen
billion and you've got spending commitments of one point for trillion.

(02:00:20):
You've heard the criticism, Sam, and so then Sam gets
pretty upset and he says, well, if you want to
sell your shares, I'll find you a buyer enough talk
about this. Surprised by the confrontation, Gersner let out a
laugh in response, he says, I think there's a lot
of people who talk with a lot of breathless concern
about our compute stuff or whatever that would be, that

(02:00:42):
would be thrilled to buy your shares. We could sell
your shares or anybody else's to some of the people
who are making the most noise on Twitter about this.
Very quickly, he said, so, yeah, these guys get very upset.
I remember when you know Bill Gates kept shorting Tesla stock.
I guess he lost a lot of money on it
because tescl stocks continue to go up and really got

(02:01:04):
the ire of Elon Musk and.

Speaker 3 (02:01:05):
Oh, I guess Tesla's good for something then.

Speaker 2 (02:01:09):
But yeah, not too clear what's going to happen right now.
There's been a big pushback because Musk wants them to
sign up for a trillion dollar compensation package for him
and some of the investors. They're pushing back on that.
So he goes on to he wouldn't talk about actual numbers.
He would only say quote revenue is growing steeply and

(02:01:31):
saying that open ai is taking an open bet that
it's going to continue to grow. Well, that's what it is.
Bets on both sides of this. You know, open ai
is laying the groundwork for an initial public offering that
could value the company add up to a trillion dollars,
he said, So there we go. That's always the fallback.
If you can't make money, what you do is you

(02:01:52):
sell stories on Wall Street. The Wall Street is built
of multiple stories. Bitcoin has fallen below one hundred and
one thousand and dropped to five month lows on Tuesday.
The price of bitcoin decreased six percent over the last day,
about one hundred thousand, nine hundred and eighty dollars, a

(02:02:16):
level not seen since June, when the cryptocurrency last was
priced under one hundred thousand dollars. I don't know where
it is today, but so far Bitcoin has been down
twelve and a half percent over last week. Ethereum has
dropped eighteen percent, Ripple has gone down seventeen percent, Solana
has gone down twenty three percent. Remember, Ripple and Solana

(02:02:36):
were some of these companies that were singled out by
Trump when he's talking about a bitcoin reserve. Everybody was
very optimistic about a bitcoin reserve. They thought some of
the money would go to Ethereum. But then Trump started
throwing in some of these companies that people really weren't
investing much in them in terms of cryptocurrency, and got
everybody kind of spooped at one point or the other.

Speaker 3 (02:02:59):
Also, the current price bitcoin appears to be one hundred
and three thousand.

Speaker 2 (02:03:02):
Dollars, so it's gone up a little bit, dropped down
below the hundred. Well, I'm very concerned about all of
these different things. And again, bitcoin doesn't seem to be
moving as a kind of a safe haven thing. In
other words, it doesn't move an opposition to the markets
that moves with the markets, which I think is kind

(02:03:22):
of a strange thing. And we had a Russian expert
talked about bitcoin and was very skeptical of it.

Speaker 10 (02:03:32):
I made it.

Speaker 2 (02:03:34):
The US is now trying to rewrite the rules of
the gold and cryptocurrency markets. Remember the size of their
debt thirty five trillion. Oh, this is going to be
a couple of months old, because now thirty eight these
two sectors krypton gold are essentially alternatives to traditional global
currency system. Washington's actions in this area clearly highlight one

(02:03:58):
of their main goals to urgently address the declining trust
and the dollar. As in the nineteen thirties and the
nineteen seventies, the US plans to solve its financial problems
at the world's expense, he says, this time by pushing
everyone into the crypto cloud. Over time, once part of

(02:04:24):
the US national debt is placed into stable coins, Washington
will devalue that debt. But simply they have a thirty
five trillion dollar currency debt, They'll move it into the
crypto cloud, devalue it, and start from scratch. That's the
reality for those who are so enthusiastic about crypto I

(02:04:48):
think that really is the plan. I think that's why
the Secretary of Commerce is the main stable coin guy
that Trump has brought in. And of course the real
concern as well is also the tokenization, which is very
much like the securitization fraud that Michael Burry was talking
about saw and talked about going back to two thousand

(02:05:09):
and five, two thousand and seven.

Speaker 17 (02:05:11):
I would say the biggest question from central banks is
what is the right.

Speaker 2 (02:05:14):
Now here's the guy who made so much money you
talking about, Michael Burry. Will that really helped us set
up digitizing their own Larry Fink?

Speaker 17 (02:05:20):
What does that mean for the role of the dollar
if every currency digitizes and we have it, you know,
what does that mean for bank payments? What does that
mean for the for the payment companies like MasterCard and Visa?
All these are being questioned right now. I will make
you know, I think we spend so much time talking
about a AI. We're not spending enough time talking about

(02:05:43):
how quickly we're going to tokenize every financial asset and
the opportunity we're going to have to have a digital
wallet and moving you know, etf and other things through
a digital wallet. And I think that's going to happen
worldwide very rapidly, and I think most countries are ill
prepared for that. And I underappreciate how technology is changing that,

(02:06:06):
not unlike how technology is changing.

Speaker 3 (02:06:08):
AI and other things.

Speaker 17 (02:06:10):
It will be changing the technology around the plumbing of finance.

Speaker 2 (02:06:17):
Yeah, the plumbing is a good analogy for it. I
think the seerage.

Speaker 6 (02:06:24):
That's what I was going to say. Yeah, that's a
good point that you made. That he was the one
who really made out, like abandoned quite literally in two
thousand and eight collapse, because he was a big part
of it and got a lot of bailout money that
was then used to start Black Rock, which has been
influencing the US ever since.

Speaker 3 (02:06:43):
That's right, and.

Speaker 6 (02:06:44):
They're going to do the same thing with whatever next
crisis he creates.

Speaker 2 (02:06:49):
I believe it is a pump and dump, especially the
stable coin stuff. And he does want to securitize and
to tokenize every financial asset, and that is such a
warning because that's what real estate is real, right, what
they do. They wrecked it by tokenizing it, and that's
what the securitization was.

Speaker 3 (02:07:09):
Really.

Speaker 2 (02:07:09):
They made it not real, and they're going to do
the same type of thing with this, and so that's
why I say, you know, they all even tokenize gold. However,
physical gold will still be in your control. But I
do think all this crypto stuff is a pump and
dump by the usual suspects. Speaking of usual suspects, getting

(02:07:30):
back to this pardon for the Finance founder cz Or
Changping Zau convicted of money laundering, and so Trump was
asked in the sixty Minutes interview about why he pardoned Cz.

Speaker 18 (02:07:46):
This is here The president has pardoned or shortened the
sentences of more than sixteen hundred people. The latest pardon
was for a cryptocurrency tycoon, as CZ. The company CZ founded, Finance,
helped boost the profile of the Trump family's crypto firm,
World Liberty Financial. He pled guilty in twenty twenty three

(02:08:08):
to violating anti money laundering laws. The government at the
time said that Cz had caused significant harm to US
national security, essentially by allowing terrorist groups like Hamas to
move millions of dollars around.

Speaker 19 (02:08:22):
Why did you pardon him?

Speaker 12 (02:08:23):
Okay, are you ready?

Speaker 7 (02:08:24):
I don't know who he is.

Speaker 12 (02:08:25):
I know he got a four month sentence or something
like that, and I heard it was a Biden witch hunt.

Speaker 19 (02:08:31):
In twenty twenty five, his crypto Exchange Finance helped facilitate
a two billion dollar purchase of World Liberty Financial's stable coin.
And then you pardoned CZ. How do you address the
appearance of pay for play?

Speaker 12 (02:08:48):
Well, here's the thing. I know nothing about it because
I'm too busy.

Speaker 19 (02:08:50):
Doing the other But he can only tell you that
got about.

Speaker 12 (02:08:53):
I can only tell you this.

Speaker 7 (02:08:56):
My sons are into it.

Speaker 12 (02:08:57):
I'm glad they are because it's probably a great end
street crypto.

Speaker 17 (02:09:00):
I think it's good.

Speaker 9 (02:09:01):
You know, they're running a business and not in government
because you were.

Speaker 2 (02:09:05):
Yeah, my son's are going, you know, like Hunter. So
they're doing this and a you know, they've all got
their scams that they're working, don't they.

Speaker 6 (02:09:15):
So I think the left down the right has the
opinion of, well, if the president's son does it, it's
not illegal.

Speaker 2 (02:09:20):
That's right. If the president's son does it, it's not illegal.
And again, I don't know anything about it, anything about that.

Speaker 14 (02:09:26):
I didn't see the interview. I don't know any of
the details.

Speaker 2 (02:09:29):
I didn't see the I don't know who this guy is.

Speaker 14 (02:09:33):
I don't know the details about that. I've just read it.
I didn't talk with him about that. I don't know
the latest developments, but it's first I've heard of that.
I know anything about it. I don't know what you're
talking about with the children. I haven't seen that, so
I'm not going to comment on it.

Speaker 7 (02:09:45):
I know nothink.

Speaker 2 (02:09:47):
Yeah, that's right. And of course he said that about
Dallainne Maxwell Trump did as well. I haven't heard that
name for a very long time. There was something about
that somewhere, you know, somebody that he hung out with
for years, fifteen years when he was around Jeffrey Epstein.
But he doesn't really know who that is. And of
course he doesn't know anything about this guy, even though

(02:10:09):
this guy's the one who got them.

Speaker 3 (02:10:11):
Started in their world liberty.

Speaker 2 (02:10:13):
Financial thing, right, which is the big business now for
the Trumps, that's their primary business, and he's the one
who got them started in it. But they don't know
anything about that. Just hours later, after he had pardoned him,
he told a reporter that he didn't know why the
White House had decided to pardon him, highlighting what MSNBC
is calling a brazenly corrupt pardon. Well, I don't know,

(02:10:37):
he said. At the time, he was recommended by a
lot of people. I don't know who he is. I
know he got a four month sentence or something like that.
I heard it was a Biden witch hunt.

Speaker 3 (02:10:46):
He said.

Speaker 2 (02:10:47):
Well, ZAO stepped down in twenty twenty three after the
firm pled guilty to failing to effectively maintain an anti
money laundering program. And again I don't like these anti
money lawns wondering things. And it was an attack on
the crypto industry from the Biden administration, people like Elizabeth
Warren all this know your customer stuff. It is, you know,

(02:11:10):
since they're moving the banking industry over to this, which
is what Eric Trump has said. He said there's not
going to be any banks in another decade for the
most part, it's all going to be stable coin and
things like that. So this is know your customers, how
they get the information on you, so they can report
on financial crimes to the government. So again I don't

(02:11:30):
look at that as being a real crime. Nevertheless, this
isn't his only rodeo with this type of thing. You
remember the guy who was a multi billionaire in crypto
and he paid millions of dollars for that quote unquote
artwork that was a banana that was duct taped to
a wall, remember that, and he paid millions of dollars

(02:11:54):
for that, And then as a sign of ostentatious wealth
and power, after paying millions of dollars for that, he
takes it off the wall and eats the banana, which, again,
why let it set up there and rot? I mean,
if you're going to pay his dollars to Mussel, at
least get a banana out of it. All I got
is lousy banana.

Speaker 3 (02:12:15):
But that must have I hope it was the best
banana anyone's ever had.

Speaker 2 (02:12:19):
Anyway, that guy who was also found guilty not of
something that I think is basically a non crime, he
was found guilty of another crime and got out of
jail after he gave I think it's like twenty five
million dollar contribution to the Trump campaign. Then he got
his pardon. So there's a lot of that stuff that

(02:12:41):
is going around. And so again I know nothing at
all about that. I didn't see that coming. The only
forty seconds of Fox News covering Trump not knowing who
he pardoned. In other words, this is an article from Mediaite,
which is the left wing organization that looks at the

(02:13:02):
media for the most part, and they said, even though
he made this ridiculous statement and was called out on
it on sixty minutes, said that for the entire week,
I think it was, there was only forty seconds talking
about this on Fox News. The extraordinary admission ricocheted across

(02:13:23):
social and political media in recent days. Fox however, remains
an exception and has given it barely a shrug. The
only mention came on Guthel late Monday night, when the
comedian Tom Shalou riffed on the answer and laughed it off.
He told the panel, he said, there's so many good
clips in the interview, and you selected some of them,

(02:13:45):
but there was other gems in there as well. My
favorite one is when she asked him about his latest pardon,
and it was this crypto guy. I didn't know about
this crypto guy, but apparently she read all the things
he was accused of and said, why did you pardon him?
And he said, ready for this. I have no idea
who it is. He said, his sons are into crypto.
He said, my sons are really into crypto, but I'm

(02:14:07):
too busy. I have no idea who he is. But
you know, people said that he was railroaded, so he
pardoned him. Yeah, he just kept it. That's my favorite
answer ever. Well, the only other moment that the instance
came up was during a rollback of the Views mockery
on Hannity. Trump's comments were unaddressed by guest Lawrence Jones,

(02:14:27):
who slammed the ABC host's commentary as slanderous. By contrast,
Fox has continued to hammer Joe Biden's reportedly extensive use
of autopen and his own pardons when closing out his
term in office. They talked about that one hundred and
sixty four times in four weeks. They're still talking about

(02:14:48):
Biden's autopen. But when it comes to Trump, I know nothing.
I'm not responsible for anything this stuff.

Speaker 3 (02:14:55):
People will hear no evil speak, no evil fromout our
dear leader.

Speaker 6 (02:15:00):
As long as it was his hand signing whatever it
was that he shouldn't know that he was signing, that's okay,
that's right.

Speaker 2 (02:15:06):
As long as his hand doesn't know what his head
is thinking or what his other hand is story, that's fine.
You just don't want to have it mechanized with it
not open. Well, gold and silver have been down a
little bit as a dollar exchange rate has hit a
six month high. And so the question, though, is that
going to remain? And I think the real issue is

(02:15:29):
when you look at the debt, we've added another trillion
dollars faster than we've ever added. It's accelerating, and that
truly is the issue. As that guy was talking about
with in Russia in terms of how they're trying to
reposition things into stable coins. Well, AI is taking its
toll on jobs. Which jobs, that's the question. Amazon announced

(02:15:50):
on October twenty eighth that it will eliminate about fourteen
thousand corporate positions in order to stay nimble, they said.
UPS meanwhile, has revealed that it has cut thirty four
thousand operational jobs in the first nine months of this year.
Nestley said on October sixteenth that it will reduce sixteen
thousand jobs worldwide. Unlike past automation waves that mimic the

(02:16:14):
functions of the human body, replacing manual or routine tasks,
AI targets the human brains cognitive abilities, and so they said,
the people who are going to be hurt the most
are going to be people who are involved in white
collar tasks. And this is what I've been reporting for
a very long time. About ten years ago, there was

(02:16:36):
a study that was done by South Korea about AI
and they were saying that they thought that by twenty
thirty they'd be massive unemployment. The least they went to
industry by industry, and the least replacement was in manual
things or in transportation, and that was about fifty percent.

(02:16:57):
They thought that for jobs like medical for doctors and lawyers,
that's going to be in the seventy plus percent range
in terms of jobs taken by AI. But that is
yet to surface. And according to the MIT thing that
people have really overhyped AI, it may eventually happen, but

(02:17:18):
it is a ways off. The federalis Are Bank of
New York of Saint Louis, I'm sorry, said, Our results
suggests that we may be witnessing the early stages of
AI driven job displacement. Unlike previous technological revolutions that altered
manufacturing or routine clerical work, generative AI can target cognitive
tasks performed by knowledge workers, which were traditionally the most

(02:17:42):
secure employment categories. The Goldman, Sachs and Now analysts projected
widespread AI adoption could displace sixty seven percent of the
US workforce equipalment to millions of jobs. The founder and CEO, however,
of Epic That's with two Eyes for some reason, a

(02:18:04):
digital agency specializing in generitive engine optimization, said the fear
of mass AI driven job losses, however, is overstated. He said.
Among the companies that we work with and a digital
marketing including major tech firms, layoffs haven't really been the story. Instead,
the jobs are morphing. A junior copywriter becomes the AI

(02:18:26):
content editor, responsible for prompt engineering and fact checking and
editing AI generated copy. In other words, there's going to
be a lot of people who are going to be
checking AI for accuracy to make sure that it's not hallucinating.
He also estimated that about two and a half percent
of jobs are genuinely at risk under a full scale

(02:18:47):
AI rollout, noting that the true end to end automation
is much harder than the headlines suggest. So what they're
saying is is that white collar jobs analytical jobs are
the ones at risk from AI, while manual labor jobs
are facing risk from robotics. So they said, the sowing economy,

(02:19:08):
of course, and the business cycle are also contributing factors
to the recent job reduction. I think the biggest impact
on the economy is going to be the stock market
bubble that bursts. Well, while this is happening, what kind
of impact is it going to have on us? Well,
a lot of this is going to be. Part of
this is going to be weapons and the way the
weapons are used. This is Palmer Lucky who has you know,

(02:19:32):
he's one of the technocracy guys. He's part of the
PayPal mafia. That Peter Teel is the PayPal godfather. Will
He's got a company and Drwill and like Palanteer named
after Lord of the Ring items and Drewyll was a
sword volunteer. Was their crystal ball. They could see what

(02:19:54):
we're doing. And so he's getting into the defense industry.
And this is a clip of him talking about his
Eagle AI helmet, showing it to Joe Rogan and he says, yeah,
this shows us where the bad guy is. And it
this person commented on it. This is Jason Bassler. So

(02:20:15):
it just shows you how detached you can become treating
war like a video game. But isn't that what we're
sitting down in Venezuela all the time? I mean, this
is just more technology to do the same thing.

Speaker 20 (02:20:27):
Notice a drone picks up a guy behind that container
over there, and what's going to happen is when he
walks behind that container, I'm able to continue to see
where he is and what he's doing. So here's ghost
X is the drone that's watching. He's just watch for
a moment. So the blue force is my friendlies. So
see that little right hand corner where it sees behind

(02:20:47):
the containers. Uh huh, they're tracking where the bad guy is.
They're tracking where my guys are. And then watch when
they go behind the container, so I can actually see
through it and watch now they're engaging the guy over there.

Speaker 7 (02:21:00):
He's down.

Speaker 20 (02:21:01):
So this is a system that allows everybody to basically
be operating as one, one combined hive mind where you
can all share a view of the world.

Speaker 7 (02:21:12):
And by the way, this view that.

Speaker 20 (02:21:13):
I have, it's shared now with all of the robots
as well. So anything I see, like let's see I
see someone inside of a building, every drone and every
person now sees that person where he is. It's so
crazy that I was born at the right time to
actually get to build all this stuff.

Speaker 3 (02:21:33):
Aren't we lucky?

Speaker 2 (02:21:35):
Maybe he's lucky. Maybe we're not lucky. Yeah, how fortunate
that we say.

Speaker 3 (02:21:42):
He seems more human than Zuckerberg or any of these
other guys. I think he's actually a tech guy. I
think he actually is just geeked out on the idea
of like, Wow, this is such cool tech. It's going
to help the good guys. Maybe I'm wrong, maybe I'm naive. Well, yeah,
it doesn't make it better. That's what I've always.

Speaker 6 (02:22:01):
Seen Oculus in his parents' garage. He is very technically savvy.

Speaker 3 (02:22:06):
Yeah, he just seems like the type of guy that
is just super super into like what can I build?
What can I design? How can I advance technology? He
doesn't seem like this weird, creepy, malevolent, calculating psychopath like
these other guys.

Speaker 2 (02:22:20):
Except he is now focused on weapons to kill people,
and which is exactly you know what Michael Crichton would
always had the character in Jurassic Park played by Goldbloom
Right always say, well, just because you can build it
doesn't mean that you should build it. You should think
as an engineer, as a scientist, you want to think
about how this is going to be used and who

(02:22:41):
is going to be using it, And that is a
whole nother story.

Speaker 6 (02:22:46):
It seems to be.

Speaker 3 (02:22:46):
That's a that is a continual issue that we run across,
whether it's you know, it's been the same. It was
an issue in Michael Crichton's time when he wrote Jurassic Park.
It's an issue now. These people just get excited by
the fact, like I'm getting paid big bucks to design
cool things. I'm getting to solve problems, and that's all

(02:23:07):
they care about. It's not well, what other applications does
this tech that you're building have. Is it just going
to be used by good guys to stop bad guys
or is it going to have other more sinister applications.
What's the trade off?

Speaker 2 (02:23:20):
And of course, you know it is not just you
know everything that he's focusing on with androl, which is
a sore right. So all of these technologies, unlike his
virtual reality helmet, this is all about the military industrial
complex and he can get very rich selling this kind
of stuff to the government. So besides his hive mind
where they can communicate to everybody and give everyone a

(02:23:43):
map of where all the bad guys are, he's also
working on fighter drones. These are drones that are going
and they now made their maiden flight the Fighter drone prototype.
It's one of two designs currently being developed under the
first phase or Increment one of the Air Force's Collaborative
Combat Aircraft program. And so these are going to be

(02:24:06):
the wingmen, if you will, of a jet that's going
to be out there. So you have a very expensive
human jet that'll be flying out there, and then it'll
have flying along with it other jets that are going
to be autonomous. And this is going to be kind
of the transitional situation to a fully autonomous fighter jets

(02:24:28):
that are out there. The uncrewed fighter jets have gone
from concept to flight in less than two years, said
the Air Force. This flight testing expands the program's knowledge
based on flight performance, autonomous behaviors, and mission system integration.
So again this is augmenting what the fighter jet pilots

(02:24:52):
would actually be doing the top guns that are out there.
So Marky Mark comment about that.

Speaker 3 (02:24:58):
Yeah, Marky Mark, thank you very much, he says. And
Duha and Durill is also designing AI unmanned fighter aircraft.
They'll fly alongside man fighters as loyal wingmen.

Speaker 2 (02:25:08):
Yeah, that's that's right here. They'll be loyal as long
as somebody doesn't crack the code, reprogram it, or take
it over. Then it'd be a disloyal wingman friendly fire.
What a time to be alive.

Speaker 3 (02:25:21):
Sorry, it looks like the Indian bot farm has cracked
your code and has slaved your drone fighters to their agenda.
N Max says, I'd bet it's all going to the
black budget that has always kept a secret from us
in Congress.

Speaker 2 (02:25:36):
Yeah, I'm sure, n Max.

Speaker 3 (02:25:38):
Also, Trump gave the military Industrial Complex and their two
or fifty billions so now one trillion budget so they
can trail more, create more bioweapons, spy on you better,
and god knows what else. Audi Mrr says, I don't
love any territory. I understand where you're coming from, Audi,
but I also personally I feel that a little bit

(02:26:00):
of love where where you're from is a good thing.
I like where I grew up, I like where I
am now, I like where I've lived. I wanted to
see the best for it, and I think different regions
create different types of people. You know where you are
from does have an impact on that, and I think
it's important to love where you're from. Someone that doesn't
love something will settle for changing it, not necessarily changing

(02:26:22):
it for the better. They'll simply be willing to try anything. Sure,
why not, let's go for it. This could be something.
Someone who loves the place they're from is going to
be more cautious, more circumspect, more delicate with the way
they go about things. That's my opinion, But you know
that's just an opinion. I appreciate yours.

Speaker 6 (02:26:42):
Don't always like to mention GK. Chesterton and Orthodoxy. I'm
reminded of that one part in it where is talking
about some small British town with a funny name Pimlico. Yes,
and said the whole line of Rome wasn't great or

(02:27:03):
people didn't love Rome because she was great. Rome was
great because her people loved her. And if the people
love Pemblican could love Pemblican in the same way, then
it too would rise to the heights of the world.
It's loving the place you're in, wanting what's best for
the place you're in. That's what true patriotism means.

Speaker 3 (02:27:24):
Mmmm.

Speaker 2 (02:27:26):
And you know I do see that a lot with
people in New York and Chicago. Yeah, they really do
love the place.

Speaker 3 (02:27:31):
That's also true of Texas as well. Texans love Texas,
and I think that's one of their most endearing qualities
is just this now Texas. I'm from Texas. Texas is
the best. It's just like, you know what, I'm so
glad you love Texas. If you're from New York and
you love New York, that's great. I want you to
love New York. I want you to love New Jersey.
I want you to love the middle of nowhere Arkansas,

(02:27:54):
because you're from there, and gosh darn it, it's the
best middle of nowhere there is. I'm obsessed with a
small town in Arkansas called cow Buyo. I passed through
it once and just because the name cow Buy You,
I love it. My goal is to one day have
enough money to buy the entire town. I will own Cowbyo.
I'm not going to I'll never own cow buy You,
but it's my dream. It's my dream to own cow

(02:28:16):
buy You. Because I love cow BYO. I encountered a
very very large snapping turtle on the road, a cow byo.

Speaker 2 (02:28:23):
Oh. That makes it memorable. Well don't go to Lizard Lake,
North Carolina. Then okay, Well we're gonna take a quick
break and we come back. We're going to take a
look at the car pockalypse because private transportation is so
important and there are many important things that are being
done against it. So we'll be right back.

Speaker 7 (02:29:36):
You're listening to the David Knight.

Speaker 8 (02:29:38):
Show, whether you're feeling like the Booze or Bluegrass APS
Radio as you covered check out a wide variety of
channels on our app at APS radio dot Com.

Speaker 2 (02:29:56):
All right, welcome back, and as we look at what
is happening with cars, we're talk abou car apocalypse. Let's
talk about the cyber truck. Because the cyber truck was
supposed to be apocalypse proof and it's now been recalled.
This is the tenth recall that they've had this time
because it's light bars are falling off. So they said

(02:30:16):
the light bar is attached with glue, leading to over
six hundred warranty claims, and they make a big deal
with the fact that it's designed with glue. Well, there
have been some real obvious design flaws on the cyber truck,
but that's not necessarily one of them. I mean, if
you've got a glue that is done properly, it can
be stronger than the materials involved. But the problem with

(02:30:40):
this was that it was not done properly. They didn't
use the right combination of glues and materials in the
right way, evidently, and that's what's caused the issue here.

Speaker 6 (02:30:50):
Maybe by apocalypse proof they mean it's already been through
an apocalypse, Like it's already post apocalyptic. You're not going
to notice any difference. The stuff is already pulling apart.

Speaker 2 (02:31:02):
It's kind of like the world according to Garp when
he gets out of the car and he sees the
plane crashes in the house that the realtor was showing him,
and he goes, that's great, I'll take it. It's predisastered.
So anyway, the issue is really more than the individual

(02:31:23):
flaws on a particular car or anything. It really is
more of what Musk has done by pushing self drive.
I think that is the key thing. Of course, he
put that out there to sell the idea that it
was cutting edge, that it was futuristic, and all the
rest of this stuff. But self driving cars are an
idea from hell. They are an idea from DARPA. More specifically,

(02:31:48):
that was the very first competition that they had, was
self driving cars. They do not want us to own cars,
and they do not want us to be able to
drive cars, because then they have immobilized us. And of course,
if you're fighting a war, one are the things that
you do. You after supply lines, You also go after communication,
and you go after mobilization, and if you cut off

(02:32:09):
all those different things, you pretty much have got the enemy.
And you have to understand that the governments see us
as the enemy. Well, Musk says, futurism duped his fans
into thinking that they were getting an apocalypse apocalypse proof
tank with a cyber truck. The reality is that they
were getting soon to be rust buckets held together by

(02:32:30):
a combination of glue and the driver's powerful siege mentality
against the world gone woke. Nearly two years on since
its first release, the pickups woes still have not ended.
On Thursday, Tesla admitted that it was recalling nearly sixty
two hundred cyber trucks because of their off road light
bar attachment can fly off and hit other motorists. That's

(02:32:51):
about ten percent of all the cyber trucks ever sold.

Speaker 3 (02:32:54):
How long have they had light bars solved on other trucks?
This isn't so cutting edge piece of new technology that
we made. This entirely new thing. We haven't got it
quite work out. Sometimes it comes up it's a light bar.
How many times have you seen a light bar on
just a Ford or a Chevy or any any brand
of truck. Have you ever seen them come flying off?
Or have you seen these guys you know out you know,

(02:33:16):
you can watch YouTube videos. Guys love light bars on
the truck and they're taking through the most extreme conditions
and they're holding on. Fine, these you bolt these things on,
I'm assuming and that's how it goes.

Speaker 2 (02:33:25):
Well. No, it wasn't bolted on it. It was glued on.

Speaker 3 (02:33:27):
Ah, of course.

Speaker 2 (02:33:29):
But the thing is they said that, you know the
issue where they told the service technicians they said they'd
use the wrong combination of adhesives installing it, because.

Speaker 3 (02:33:37):
I imagine you did.

Speaker 2 (02:33:38):
Yeah, if you do glue something on, like I said earlier,
it's it can be stronger than the material that's there
and all. Tesla has racked up over six hundred warranty claims.
One field report related to the issue, though says that
it isn't aware of any related crashes on these injuries. Again,
you know, contrastice.

Speaker 6 (02:33:57):
If parts are falling off your car, I don't think
it's a problem for you. It's a problem for the
people behind you.

Speaker 2 (02:34:03):
Well, it could be a problem if you run over
it and it punctures the battery, because that's a that's
a fire hazard then. But you know, just compared to this,
you know, they said they've had ten recall issues with
the cyber trucks. When do we get a recall on
the pharmaceutical products out there out there? Right? You know,
we just you know, whatever happens with the pharmaceutical stuff,

(02:34:26):
there's never a recall with it. And then when we
look at California, there ought to be some recalls on
their driver's licenses. I think it's not just the the
tens of thousands of foreign domiciled commercial drivers that they
have given licenses to who can't speak English and can't
read signs. They also are just have a revolving door

(02:34:48):
on people who have DUI's. Here's one guy fit the headline,
one guy with fifteen DUI's still driving. California's failure to
take repeat drunk drivers off the road, Well, that's not
really an unusual thing because you know, you can be
a repeat rapist, you can be a repeat you name it.

(02:35:10):
And they keep, you know, putting people back out on
the street. Ontario, meanwhile, has banned all speed cameras after
Ford called them a cash grab. This guy is dug Ford.
It's going to really endear himself to the people up there.
First of all telling the truth about Trump's tariff stuff,
and now he's telling the truth about speed cameras job Ontario. Yeah, well, forward,

(02:35:34):
he's I don't know's I wouldn't say. I don't know
much about his policies except he's done some really questionable
things in the past.

Speaker 6 (02:35:42):
I don't know anything about him. I can't picture Ontario
electing a truly good person, but everything I've heard about.

Speaker 3 (02:35:47):
Him has been good.

Speaker 2 (02:35:49):
No, Yeah, well, I don't know. I certainly that is
the purpose of these speed cameras is to raise revenue,
and they're not concerned about safety. And this is not
just Ontario's everywhere. I mean just look at the fact
and I mentioned this the other day. You know, in
traffic court when I've been there, I've seen people they're
drunk drivers, repeat offenders, have a long list of these things,

(02:36:12):
and judge just let them go. But if you drive
without a license, now you're challenging their authority. And that's
really what matters to them.

Speaker 3 (02:36:19):
North American house, hippo. If you're in the audience today,
let us know what you know about Doug Ford.

Speaker 2 (02:36:24):
Yeah, he may not be from that area, from Ontario.

Speaker 3 (02:36:27):
I just assume being Canadian, he might have or info,
though I guess he hasn't lived there in a long time.

Speaker 2 (02:36:32):
That's right. Well, and Nvidia is forging a partnership with
Uber to deploy one hundred thousand AI powered robotaxis by
twenty twenty seven. We may look nostalgically back on the
day when we had foreigners who couldn't speak English to
read signs, because those are the good old days. Now

(02:36:53):
we've got robo trucks out there that are driving eighty
thousand pounds rigs.

Speaker 3 (02:36:57):
We've got ED two nine at the hell of the
big rig.

Speaker 2 (02:37:01):
Yeah. Yeah, it's no matter how bad things are, they
can always get worse, can't they. And this may be
the next step that is coming with all of this.

Speaker 6 (02:37:11):
Well, it is at real humans driving and cooking, but driving.

Speaker 2 (02:37:15):
Yeah, that's right. Well. Universal basic income is again the
way that we're going to make slavery great again. And
this is something being pushed by every one of the
technocrats that are out there. That was the very first
thing that Elon Musk pushed. It was Andrew Yang's main
issue when he first ran for a president and he

(02:37:39):
got a million dollars from Elon Musk. Universal basic income
is something that is being pushed across the spectrum, even
by formally conservative economists who pointed out the danger of
the welfare state and yet looking the other way. When
it is being done universally for everybody, it will be

(02:37:59):
life as a slave. That is what they're trying to get.
And that's the end game for you will own nothing,
and you'll be happy about it because you'll just be
all of you will be happy slaves out there. Porsche
meanwhile reveals the secret boxer that has been shooting its
fastest cars. See if you can get the picture of

(02:38:20):
that lance. That's really interesting. The rig that they've set up,
and when we look at the rigs that are set
up for filming, this is one of the more interesting ones.
They put it to good use since it's got a
rear engine, So put the person in the front and
have them shoot the other car. And that's what they're doing.
They've reinforced that, of course with a lot of other
things in case there's a crash with that. But still

(02:38:42):
there's another picture a little bit further down.

Speaker 3 (02:38:44):
That's got to be an incredibly fun job. I'm just saying,
you know, yeah, I'm Porsche's fronk cameraman, you know.

Speaker 2 (02:38:54):
The fronk man. Yeah, that's an interesting position. They got
him in there. But yeah, we're going to take a
quick break, or you want to get some of the
comments here before taking breaks.

Speaker 3 (02:39:05):
Yeah, don't frag me. Bro says a greater depression leading
to the greater taking rationing and austerity war offers the
solution to implement the next great reset.

Speaker 5 (02:39:15):
Yes, that's right.

Speaker 3 (02:39:16):
Jerry al Azallo one point one billion short bet, Holy
Moley talking about the guy from the Big Short I
can I'm terrible with names. Michael Burry, Michael Burray. We
literally talked about him ten minutes ago and his name
has fled from my mind.

Speaker 6 (02:39:33):
And we mentioned that that was eighty percent of his Yeah. Fun,
but let's not forget that this is a short bet,
so you are on the hook for more than just
what you bet. If it goes wrong, he could have
a margin call that completely wipes him out if his
bet is wrong.

Speaker 2 (02:39:50):
Yeah, so he's pretty confident of it. He's bet eighty
percent of the company and these two things.

Speaker 3 (02:39:56):
To be fair, I'm assuming, you know, twenty percent of
his company. He's still massively wealthy, so you know, Big
brit is back again, says major update. Plane crash, nine dead,
sixteen missing. Bodies found in Louisville. So sorry to hear that.
I'm so sorry for their families. I'm assuming those sixteen
missing are probably going to join the numbers of the dead.

(02:40:18):
Not many people survive plane crashes. Trump Berger. Trump knows
if he just keeps playing dumb that he can't be touched.

Speaker 7 (02:40:27):
I didn't know.

Speaker 3 (02:40:27):
I didn't Oh wow, that's crazy. I didn't know. I
didn't know that. Didn't know. I couldn't do that. Don't
frag me. Bro Politics is the art of not answering
the questions until the answers become irrelevant. It has always
driven me insane. Anytime you watch a reporter ask a
politician a direct question, you just get five minutes of
them dancing around, and the same.

Speaker 2 (02:40:49):
Thing is, I'm so glad you asked that question.

Speaker 3 (02:40:51):
I'm so glad you asked that. Allow me to not
answer it. Don't speak to me.

Speaker 21 (02:40:55):
Ever again, people have such short memories for politicians. That's right,
that's right, don't frag me bro read that one. Real
Jason Barker, good to see you, Jason. Of course, Jason
is part of Nights of the Storm with Angry Tiger
Karen Carpenter. And there's one more I want to say,
Ashley again, I'm terrible with names. I apologize, but Knights

(02:41:16):
of the Storm Nights of the Storm dot com. They
have the schedule there for our program, their program, Guards program,
Tony's program, lots of other programs. Go check out Nights
of the Storm dot com. Real Jason Barker says, I
don't know. AI could create more jobs for people to
clean up the generated slop.

Speaker 2 (02:41:32):
That's right, Well, we'll be AI janitors.

Speaker 3 (02:41:36):
Yeah.

Speaker 6 (02:41:37):
That was what a lot of these not profitable companies
see is that they wind up having more time spent
on fixing the AI's outputs than is spent on what
would have been spent on just creating it from scratch.
And the funny thing is that article where the guy
is saying, oh, well, that's not what we're seeing. We
aren't seeing massive layoffs. We're seeing people being put in

(02:41:58):
positions where they're overseeing the AI. It's like, yeah, that's
kind of the problem. Either it's going to work and
there will be massive layoffs, or they're going to be
stuck in this thing and the AI is still just
going to collapse.

Speaker 2 (02:42:11):
That's kind of like, you know, we're talking about image
creation and modification things like that. It can be so
frustrating to give it a prompt and it doesn't quite
understand what you're trying to say. And you know, I
look at that and I think, you know, if I'm
proficient in the tools to do the editing, to do
the image creation, to do the modeling and everything, it
might actually be a lot faster to do it myself

(02:42:33):
than to try to entice the AI into doing the
kind of prompt that I wanted to do. You go
through so many different cycles of this stuff, and it's
so time consuming. That's way for it to do its thing.

Speaker 3 (02:42:43):
That's honestly where a lot of our time comes from.
Here is me trying to come up with a good
thumbnail for the video before it goes up, and realistically
it would be quicker for me to grab elements from
the internet and put them together. But it's just with
copyright law and ownership being such a convoluted mess, it's very,

(02:43:03):
very difficult to sit there and understands like is this
a thumbnail that you know someone could come in later
and say, Hey, that's my intellectual property you've got there.
I know that you've changed it, I know that you've
done stuff to it, but that's mine and you're either
going to take that down or I'm going to sue you,
and I don't. That's big heartburn inducing.

Speaker 2 (02:43:24):
That's another big aspect of this AI bubble, you know,
because there's a lot of companies out there, movie companies,
Getty Images and audio and all this. When they come
back and they prevail on some of these things, that's
going to be a big chunk taken out of the
hide of some of these AI companies like Opening Ai.

Speaker 3 (02:43:45):
Yeah, the only way I could see them not winning
is if the government decides that these AI tools are
more important and more valuable than you know, the copyright
law that they have in place. So we'll just have
to wait and see how that plays out. Carpenter twenty
seven says, good luck with your AI healthcare practitioner. Yeah,
And of course.

Speaker 2 (02:44:05):
Caren Carpenter, actually you know. That's why I think that
it's such a good use case for replacing doctors, because
what doctors that basically become is you tell them your
symptoms and they the chart from Pfizer and tell you
which Pfiser drug that you should take. You know, so
it's going to be basically doing the same thing.

Speaker 3 (02:44:22):
Yeah. I mentioned this before, but with the RA I
could not get a diagnosis until they drew blood. They
sent it off to a lab and the computer told
them what was up? You know, oh hey, look these
are elevated. This is elevated, And it's just what did
I need the doctor for. If I could have gotten
a lab order, I could have gone in, taking the results,
put them into Google and it probably would have been

(02:44:43):
able to say, okay, based on these results, it's most
likely this that's true. It's just they are They read
nothing but printouts. The guy came in, he was there
for all of about three minutes before he said, you know,
just like, hey, you got this so long, and it's
just what's the point of this. He gets paid a
massive amount of money to read off a computer print

(02:45:05):
out and prescribe a drug advisor A what a job?

Speaker 10 (02:45:10):
What a like?

Speaker 2 (02:45:11):
Well, we've already got a lot of different professions like that.
I mean, look at paralegals who put together are you
know a lawyer who is doing real estate closing for example, right,
and he's got a paralegal who's doing all the work
and she's putting together the documents. But most of the
stuff it's kind of boilerplate anyway, So it's repetitive and
there's not a whole lot that has to really be
thought about in each one of these things, just filling

(02:45:32):
in the details correctly. And so we see that type
of thing going on everywhere, really, and so that's one
of the reasons why we become so redundos because we're
such an idiocracy in terms of everything that we do everywhere.

Speaker 3 (02:45:46):
And I mentioned this before, but when it comes to
the AI bloat of work, people just submitting bad works
that they've done. I mentioned this before, but about twenty percent.
You know, once a company reaches scale, about twenty percent
of your workers do eighty percent. The other eighty percent
are just kind of there. They fill space and they
do a little bit of work that keeps the company running.

(02:46:07):
They do just the bare minimum. AI allows them to
do a lot more, but they're still lazy. They're not
fact checking anything. So allows them to sit there and go, oh, look,
I've increased my productivity by tenfold. I'm generating so much more.
But now you have to have someone who's actually competent
go in there and review the work of these doufises
that generally didn't do enough to be a problem. Now

(02:46:31):
they're able to generate a massive amount of nonsense that
you have to deal with real Jason Barker says, none
of this tech will operate as advertised. I see where
this is heading. The tech will be too complicated for
a person to use or comprehend. So the next step
is to let the computers take it over entirely.

Speaker 2 (02:46:48):
Yeah. Well a lot of it too is like I said,
with the closing relator or something. Or you take a
look at the realtor. For example, right when we bought
our first couple of houses, realtor would get a print
out which was something that was being the MLS people
would have the different houses listed and she would go
through and do a pre screening and kind of you know,

(02:47:11):
knew what we were looking for, and so she was
actually acting as an agent. Well, now they're doing that
type of thing with AI AI agents, not just for
real estate, but you know, you can go in and
give the agent your qualifications. I got a priority for schools,
I got a priority for this type of thing, and
I'm looking for these different aspects in the house. You
know this many bedrooms or whatever, and this price range

(02:47:33):
and this general neighborhood, and it'll give you a list
of candidates, which is what the realtors used to do.
Right now, you go to the realtor website and you
can kind of do it yourself if you got access
to it, and you know there is you got to
ask yourself exactly what is it that they're adding to
this if they're not going around checking out the houses
on their own, and it's all just a database and

(02:47:55):
I can look at it virtually. Of course, the other
side of that, it's the fraud that can be But
people have started finding that some of these places that
are being advertised for rent, the people have gone in
and used AI to clean up the pictures of this
place that's a pig sty or a wreck, and when

(02:48:16):
people get there, they thought they were going to see
this as pictured.

Speaker 3 (02:48:20):
They'd got this that was a concept of what it
could look like it could.

Speaker 2 (02:48:24):
Look like that if you did a lot of work.
But you know that's I mean, there's a whole different
aspect of AI, and that's the fraud aspect that we live.

Speaker 3 (02:48:34):
In strange times. Guard Goldsmith, good to see you, Guard,
and of course Guard hosts Liberty Conspiracy at six pm weeknights.
Go check him out on Rumble and he's at guard
Goldsmith on Twitter says, the more centralized the system that
ties to the tentacles, the easier to knock out the
whole system.

Speaker 2 (02:48:53):
That's right. First time I talked to Jack Lawson, That's
what we're talking about, was how complicated our infrastructure is,
and you know how vulnerable we are two different things,
and that vulnerability is only increasing.

Speaker 6 (02:49:06):
Well, the all fix once we make everything reliant on
these central ais from these major data centers that are
extremely vulnerable and require tons of water and electricity.

Speaker 2 (02:49:19):
Yeah, that's right.

Speaker 3 (02:49:20):
Audi, Mr r Sis Travis to say this because Nashville
is nothing like it was when I first got here
in nineteen seventy seven. I definitely can understand how you feel, Audi,
not to the same extent, but the little town I
grew up in has completely changed over the years. It
was always full of liberals, but they've gone completely insane.
There used to be a silent Sam Confederate statue outside

(02:49:43):
of the courthouse in Pittsburgh, North Carolina, and that is gone.
It's becoming more commercialized day by day, and it's sad
to see. It's sad to see.

Speaker 2 (02:49:53):
I well, I went back to you know, I grew
up in Tampa and my family had been there for
several generations, and yeah, it's you know, about fifteen years ago,
I went back with Karen. Couldn't even find where my
grandparents used to have a place on the beach. They
rented it and loved in part of it. But that's
all gone.

Speaker 3 (02:50:10):
It's all high rises.

Speaker 2 (02:50:11):
I mean, it's crazy.

Speaker 3 (02:50:12):
How everything is changing. Yeah, if you are ever passing
through Pittsburgh, though, there's a cool little place called S
and T's Soda Shop. It's an old style, you know,
fountain soda shop. They do ice cream. They do food too,
but I've never had that, just gone for the ice cream.
The banana split is insanely large. So if you and three,

(02:50:33):
four or five of your friends are craving a banana split,
s and T's Soda Shop in Pittsburgh they've got one
that will feed you. Go check that out if you're
in the area. Ratisbro gonna love it when AI goes
off mission because it doesn't like your orders. Or I'm sorry, Dave,
I'm afraid I can't do.

Speaker 6 (02:50:49):
That, hallucinates we're starting World War three.

Speaker 3 (02:50:53):
Right, Wait a minute, you didn't want me to start
World War three. You're right, I did start World War three.

Speaker 6 (02:51:00):
Yes, this is terrible. Yeah, I bombed this country even
though you told me not to. I'm sorry.

Speaker 3 (02:51:07):
Big brit Is back again, says Tesla's are quite badly
built in general, and those cyber craps will kill you
in a crash. You can't open the doors, Yeah, we
covered that story.

Speaker 21 (02:51:16):
It was.

Speaker 2 (02:51:17):
Yeah, they got everything under software control, including the doors,
which is really difficult. I mean, you know, everybody's pretty
much got power windows now. They used to be a luxury,
and so it's become a really big deal in Germany.
They're aware of that, so they sell these cheap little
things and.

Speaker 3 (02:51:33):
Cutters that are windshield window breakers.

Speaker 2 (02:51:35):
Yeah, but you can't get through the door, you know,
that's the issue.

Speaker 3 (02:51:39):
I guess, you know, maybe they'll start just including the
Jaws of life with your cyber truck purchase.

Speaker 2 (02:51:44):
Yeah, try to make those windows unbreakable. But that didn't
work either. But it might be you know, even though
they were able to smash them with that metal ball
that they threw, you might still be able to get
out if you got the right kind of tool. I
don't know. They may have made that just tough enough
to trap you in when the door's do not work.

Speaker 3 (02:52:02):
All I know is those things are specifically set up
to break glass. So maybe you know when they're specifically
set up for that, they can't stop it. Big brit
Is back again. Or maybe you just need to keep
a very high caliber anti material rifle in your truck
at all times. The twenty millimeter on Zio cannon my recommendation.
Big brit Is back again. I've seen some dangerous and

(02:52:24):
hilarious videos involving self driving cars. Chinese ones are the
most dangerous. Well, the roads in China are incredibly dangerous.
It is when we were there, Every second you're on
the road feels like you're about to witness a horrific
pile up.

Speaker 2 (02:52:40):
Yeah, it was kind of a free for all.

Speaker 3 (02:52:42):
Yeah, it was a definite sort of If they have
a larger vehicle, than you do. They have the right
of way. You just get out of the eighteen wheelers
way because he's getting over and it is on you
to be aware of that.

Speaker 6 (02:52:55):
Actually, ironically, I think the AI cars would do better
in that scenario because everyone is going to get out
of their way, so it can just drive however it
wants and then the human people will avoid it.

Speaker 3 (02:53:08):
We've said it to death race mode, so take do
with that as you will.

Speaker 2 (02:53:14):
Yeah, there's a lot of anarchy and a lot of
European driving as well.

Speaker 3 (02:53:17):
Yeah, I've seen.

Speaker 2 (02:53:19):
Thing is I've looked at some old clips of like
cars in la like in the nineteen thirties or whatever.
They have well defined lanes and everybody was just kind
of a free for all, and people are paying more
attention with that, right. The thing that can really get
you is when you let your at tension down and
you think that just because there's a you got a
green light, that you're good to go, and you don't

(02:53:40):
take a look at to see the other guy on
your left is going to be going through the red light.

Speaker 3 (02:53:46):
You don't want to just blindly trust that everyone else
is alert and following the rules.

Speaker 2 (02:53:50):
That's right, We're going to take a quick break, folks,
and we'll be right back. I want to talk about
these people who are paying for the big ballroom that
Trump is building here. M h.

Speaker 7 (02:54:45):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 3 (02:54:52):
If you like the Eagles, it doesn't highway the cars,
and Huey lewis in the.

Speaker 8 (02:54:59):
News, You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio,
download our app or listen now at apsradio dot com.

Speaker 12 (02:55:10):
Looking for Washington, DC's most glamorous entertainment venue, look no
further than Donald Trump's Jeffrey Epstein Memorial Ballroom. At the
Jeffrey Epstein Memorial Ballroom, we specialize in middle school dances,
sweet sixteen parties, keen sanires, beauty pageants, foam parties, and
so much more. The Epstein Ballroom is Washington's beautiful secret,

(02:55:33):
ninety thousand square feet of bold, glitter and class. Make
your event magical with the Epstein Ballrooms. Diddy, Baby Oil, Flume,
join djdjtj as Hedj's All Ages shows, and this Christmas season,
you can sit on Santa Donni's lap, say goodbye to
one hundred and twenty three years of history, and say

(02:55:54):
hello to the Donald Trump Epstein Memorial Ballroom at the
Donald Trump Jeffrey Epstein Memorial Ballroom every day is a
wonderful secret.

Speaker 2 (02:56:05):
Well, it's no secret anymore as to the involvement of
the people who are paying for this thing. As a
matter of fact, you know, it went very rapidly from
two hundred million to three hundred million, didn't it. I
mean that that was just a couple of weeks and
increased by fifty percent. Now we find that there's about
three dozen corporate and individual donors that have been publicly identified,

(02:56:31):
and research has found that the group has received two
hundred and seventy nine billion with A B and government
contracts over the past five years. And so that kind
of falls in line with all the different things that
I've seen over and over again. I see people who
contribute to a politician in Washington, they especially to the presidency.

(02:56:55):
They will give thousands and they get millions, or they
give millions and they get billions. It's almost like it's
a regular rule of thumb that they're going to get
paid back a thousand times what they have contributed.

Speaker 3 (02:57:08):
And so here we have.

Speaker 2 (02:57:09):
These people who are going to pony up for this
three hundred million dollar ballroom, and they have already gotten
in the past five years two hundred and seventy nine billion,
again about one thousand to one. And not only that,
but they have also spent one point six billion dollars
in political contributions and lobbying fees during that time. So

(02:57:31):
there you go, that's only about one half of one percent.
In that case, private donation is about a one thousand dollars.
They get back for each dollar that is there. And
you know, we go back and we look at the
inauguration that was there, the you had all these people.
Look at the picture here there's Eric smitht Bezos, Glayne Maxwell. Yeah,

(02:57:57):
just the same club, the same group of people. Of
course Trump doesn't know who Gallaine Maxwell is, but he's
probably going to pardon her pretty soon.

Speaker 3 (02:58:06):
Have completely forgotten about her.

Speaker 2 (02:58:08):
Yeah, they have massive interests before the federal government and
they hope to undoubtedly curry favor with and receive favorable
treatment from the Trump administration, said Public Citizen Co President.
That's the group that did the research. Fourteen of the
two dozen publicly named corporate donors face federal enforcement actions

(02:58:29):
or have had such actions suspended by the Trump administration
since the start of the second term. Apple benefited in
September when the National Labor Relations Board withdrew its claims
that the company violated workers' rights. Said the report, and
so if you've got some kind of a regulatory issue
or something, it really does help to make it go
away if you give money to the Trump administrations, like

(02:58:50):
that guy who bought the duct Tate banana artwork. Pole
finds that forty seven percent of Americans view the large
US trade deficit as an economic emergency. So they would
agree with Trump that it is an emergency. And this
is being put out by a conservative outlet there they're wrong. However,

(02:59:11):
the real emergency is not the trade deficit. The real
emergency is the budget deficit. That's the real emergency. It
is a problem that our own government, just like the
UK or the EU, is hostile to manufacturing. We want
to have manufacturing in this country, and it's our government
that is the big issue on it. But when you

(02:59:34):
look at the national debt, that deficit, not the trade deficit,
but the debt that is there. We had thirty eight
trillion dollars. It grew one trillion dollars in just the
last seventy two days. Yeah, that's the real issue is
Thomas Massey pointed out, I played equip the other day.
This is all baked in with the COVID lockdown that

(02:59:54):
put us on a whole new slope of debt. What's
it for today? Thank you for joining us the common man.
They created common Core and dumb down our children. They

(03:00:17):
created common past track and control us. They're Commons project
to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But
each of us has worth and dignity created in the
image of God. That is what we have in common.

(03:00:42):
That is what they want to take away. Their most
powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's
time to turn that around and expose what they want
to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find

(03:01:02):
at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank
you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please
keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Ruthie's Table 4

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Wed Episode #2132: Michael Burry vs. the Machine: The Billion-Dollar Bet

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Ruthie's Table 4

The Joe Rogan Experience

All Episodes

Wed Episode #2132: Michael Burry vs. the Machine: The Billion-Dollar Bet

On Purpose with Jay Shetty