Wed Episode #2137: The 50-Year Mortgage: How Ultra-Long Loans Destroy The American Dream

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
revolutionary act.

Speaker 2 (00:36):
It's the David Knight Show. As the clock strikes thirteen,
it's Wednesday, the twelfth of November. You have our Lord,
twenty twenty five. Well, yesterday was Veterans Day and Donald
Trump decided to celebrate it with an Al Qaeda terrorist

(00:58):
that the Pentagon and as the leader of Syria talk
about fake virtue, signaling saying that he was worried about
Christian persecution in Nigeria. He hasn't done anything about that,
but of course he could do something about Syria since
this guy is now working for him. Isn't that interesting?

(01:19):
I wonder at what point did al Qaeda start working
for the CIA and the Pentagon from its inception. Folks,
they keep changing the name and they think you're that stupid.
We're going to start with that, and with Trump's amazing
dismissal of American workers and American students, putting in China

(01:39):
six hundred thousand students and schools universities a record amount.
And of course he's got to do it to support
the universities that are the seminaries of socialism and satanism.
I'll be right back. Well, welcome back, and we were

(02:12):
going yesterday is if you heard of the beginning. We
had a rebroadcast and Travis, who's joining us from Boston,
pointed out that Karen's twin brother died unexpectedly over the
weekend and we're all still adjusting to that. A lot
of things to do, and it was a big part
of the show actually, So yeah, he did the gas gage.

(02:35):
There's Keith.

Speaker 3 (02:43):
Uncle.

Speaker 2 (02:44):
Keith was a.

Speaker 4 (02:46):
He was a big part of the show and a
really big part of our lives. He lived close to
us for my entire life, so.

Speaker 2 (02:56):
He was.

Speaker 3 (02:59):
It's been really hard.

Speaker 2 (03:00):
Yeah, he died doing what you like to do, painting.
There was a picture of him painting and he found
him at his desk painting. And they're really shocked because
he was in such healthy condition, never had any issues.
He had won bout of sickness about five years ago.
That was they diagnosed it as vasculitis, but that was

(03:21):
the only indication of it.

Speaker 4 (03:23):
And but for the past few years, you know, he
got over it. He'd been perfectly healthy and there wasn't
a single issue. Recently he seemed healthy and strong, and yes,
there was no warning, there was nothing that, you know,

(03:44):
even gave us pause for concern or made us think, well,
maybe something is up.

Speaker 2 (03:49):
And I can see from the picture of their way
when on my first date he had come down to
Florida to see care from New York and she was
so excited when she got back to the dorm and
he was waiting for her there, and well, I haven't
got a chance. She's really attached to this guy. And

(04:10):
I watched for a while then I just left, but
she came out. So that's my twin brother, and I
was like, yeah, right, looking all like each other, fraternal twins.
She had other brothers, has other brothers that do look
a lot like her. But well, let's get into the

(04:31):
news and I'll get this together. Here. We had a
interview that Laura Ingram did with Trump, which was finally
not just pure sycophancy, and I kind of thought that
it was going to be, you know, because that's what
we have seen from everybody Fox News especially. I kind
of thought that was what it was going to be

(04:53):
because it was a tease for it before it happened,
which was him taking her to the Oval office and
showing her all the gold in his Oval office.

Speaker 5 (05:03):
One thing would go, you can't. You can't imitate gold.
We'll go there's no paint that imitation.

Speaker 6 (05:10):
So these aren't like from home depot or No, this
is not home depot stuff.

Speaker 7 (05:13):
No, not Steffie Box.

Speaker 5 (05:15):
This is not home depot.

Speaker 2 (05:17):
Yeah, only the best for Trump and his castles. And
so you know, you look at that and how disgusting
that is.

Speaker 8 (05:25):
Uh.

Speaker 2 (05:25):
And of course it was also the fact that she
is not just that that was an older clip, I believe,
but there was the fact that she was also talking
about how he went out to eat. And of course
now DC is safe, Yeah, it is safe. If you've
got an army of Secret Service guys, you know, with
pack and heat that are standing around you, they're going
to leave you alone.

Speaker 9 (05:47):
Fox News Alert.

Speaker 6 (05:48):
Donald Trump is out on the town dinner with members
of his cabin special or see showing it safe. After
deploying the National Guard. Crime as we know has plummeted.

Speaker 7 (05:58):
In the city.

Speaker 6 (05:59):
But President Tromp talked to reporters just a few moments ago, So.

Speaker 9 (06:03):
Who are all those people around him?

Speaker 2 (06:05):
Yeah, I want those the city is so safe.

Speaker 9 (06:08):
Look at all his bodyguards.

Speaker 2 (06:10):
Yeah, those can be some of the most dangerous people
in Washington if you look at him the wrong way.
So maybe he's safe, but nobody else is right because
he's got the bodyguards there.

Speaker 4 (06:21):
So imagine just about any place is a lot safer
when you have the capability to theoretically knew who might
come after you, you know.

Speaker 2 (06:29):
Yeah, So they go into the Oval office and it's
he's got his new palace filled with gold embellishments. She
asked him at one point about how they have decided
to make housing affordable again. You know, we have seen

(06:49):
as the government has added mandates and regulations that have
driven the costs of cars through the ceiling. Now they've
done the same thing, of course with housing. And his
solution is a fifty year mortgage. Isn't that nice? You know?
I guess why don't you just make it forty nine
and call it the year of Jubilee? Right?

Speaker 4 (07:10):
You know what, why don't just say you get the house,
but you have to pay on it forever? You know
why you're going to sign a term limit? Just say,
you know what, you get the house, but you're going
to pay us perpetually. And if your children decide to
live in this house, they'll pay us perpetually.

Speaker 2 (07:24):
Yeah, you know, just make it like the property taxes.
You know, you never get.

Speaker 3 (07:27):
The cost down, wailow. If we did that, I bet
you can get your mortgage payoff.

Speaker 9 (07:31):
Fifty year mortgage is essentially paying it forever.

Speaker 2 (07:34):
That's right, that's right the new serfdom. Yeah. As a
matter of fact, you know, the average age right now
of a first time home buyer is forty, so that
means that you'd be ninety at the point which you
get your house paid off. How long does the average
worker work, by the way, I look that up, the
average worker works for forty three years, so this would

(07:54):
go seven years into your retirement. You think you're going
to be able to make that payment or is the
the government going to take it back? The banker should
say hard to distinguish between the two of these anyway, Yeah,
they maybe it'll take it back, or maybe you'll do
a negative mortgage and lose all your equity so that
you don't ever own anything. Doesn't that work out nice,
doesn't it? I heard that somewhere you'll own nothing and

(08:18):
you'll be happier. You'll be happier because you're in a house.
You're paying a mortgage to the bank. The bank is happier,
and you will never own that. You're going to continue
to pay it forever, just like your property taxes that
never end. So they talked about that a little bit here.

Speaker 6 (08:34):
Quot question though, because your housing director has proposed something
that has enraged your mega friends, which is this fifty
year mortgage idea, so a significant mega backlash, calling it
a giveaway to the banks and simply prolonging the time
it would take for Americans to own a home outright,
Is that really a good idea?

Speaker 10 (08:55):
It's not even a big deal. I mean, you know,
you go from forty to fifty years, and.

Speaker 2 (09:00):
What readses you pay, you pay it doesn't even.

Speaker 5 (09:02):
Know from thirty that some people.

Speaker 2 (09:04):
Hadn't put a standard mortgage yet they have.

Speaker 10 (09:05):
A fifty All it means is you pay less per
month you paid over a longer period of time. It's
not like a big factor. It might help a little bit.
But the problem was that Biden did this. He increased
the interest rates. And I have a lousy fed person
who's going to be gone in a few months. Fortunately,
I have a guy too late in Jerome Powell.

Speaker 5 (09:23):
We call him too late. He was too late and everything.

Speaker 10 (09:25):
Except when it came to before, you know, the Democrat
so called Democrat election, which didn't work.

Speaker 5 (09:31):
But we're going to get interest rates then.

Speaker 10 (09:33):
But even with interest rates up, the economy is the
strongest it's ever been. You know, you asked me just
to go back to the beginning of your question. You
talked about press were down on energy. We're down on
interest rates. You know, interest rates are down.

Speaker 2 (09:45):
They're not down on energy. Energy rates are up tremendously.
He doesn't know anything he's talking about, or if he
does know anything, he's lying to your face. He's telling
you what he wants it to be, and the people
believe him. Just amazing to me. This is a guy
he doesn't even know the standard home loan is thirty years,
because he's probably never had a standard home loan. His

(10:06):
daddy gave him hotels. He does deals with the banks
over casinos and things like that. When it comes to homes,
he pays cash, right. He doesn't go grocery shopping, as
butlers and maids do that for him. I'm disgusted with
people like that. Remember when we had George W. Bush,
he didn't know what a grocery store scanner was. Neither

(10:26):
would this guy, by the way, Yet he thinks that
it's all Jerome Powell's fault that he didn't lower interest
rates enough. Well, here's the thing. Why is it that
when Powell has lowered interest rates in the past, we
have seen home mortgage rates stay about the same, sometimes
go up. Well, it's because he can't control and won't control.

(10:48):
It's not interested in controlling the spending. He doesn't care
what the government's debt is. And that's the deficit that
he doesn't care about. You know, he worries all the
time about the trade deficit, but he doesn't worry about
the monetary deficit of the government that he directly controls.
And it's that thirty eight trillion dollar time bomb that
he keeps pouring money into. That bomb that's about to

(11:11):
burst over our heads. That's what's causing the disconnect between
the Federal Reserve and its interest rate manipulations and being
able to take down the home mortgages because people are
looking at that massive debt and saying that's inflationary and
it's going to cause all kinds of economic unrestling. I'm
not going to if you're going to continue to try

(11:36):
to monetize the debt and you're not going to control spending,
then the interest rates on medium and long term loans
are going to go up. And he doesn't even know
that because it's a guy that bankrupted a half dozen casinos.
He's a lucky loser. It's not even a big deal.
He said, you go from forty to fifty years. No,

(11:56):
you don't, She corrected him, said thirty. But he just
ignored that and then started talking about how somebody else's problem,
not his, it's Jerome Powell's problem. So she pushed him on.
She said, why are people saying that they're anxious about
the economy if everything is down? Because everything is not down,
you know, it's some grocery prices are down, some are up. Overall,

(12:20):
they're up about three to five percent, and the energy
costs are soaring because of his technocrat buddies and they're
AI data centers, and also because the green New Deal stuff.
And that's the other thing they play, this blame game,
the Democrats and Republicans. The Republicans say there's all the
green stuff, and they're right, it is the green stuff.

(12:41):
And now it's going to they're going to pour gasoline
on that Democrat fire that they have set on our
energy infrastructure. The Republicans are going to throw gasoline on
that with the AI data centers. You know, they're both right.
The Democrats say, see AI data centers that you guys
want to put in, and the Republicans say, it's the

(13:01):
green mandates are out there. They're both right, and they're
both killing us, and neither one of them are going
to acknowledge or pull back on either one of these
two prongs of this dilemma that are destroying this country
and going to destroy it. So Trump said, I don't
know why they're saying that the economy is not good.

(13:22):
I think the polls are fake. We have a great economy.
The greatest economy you've ever had, folks, is nothing but
ballroom capitalism. He's going in there gilding all of these
stats and the polls and the lies that he tells you.
Ingram asked Trump if he felt voter has had the
wrong perception of his repeated claims of strong economic growth

(13:46):
or if the GOP needed to do more to convince them.
Trump reverted to form, noting more than anything else, it's
a con job by the Democrats because costs are way down. Yeah,
just lie about it, went all well fails. She also
addressed Trump's true social post where he offered a ten
thousand dollars bonus for air traffic controllers who continued to

(14:09):
work during the government's shutdown. Here again is his reward
punishment stuff. You know, maybe you ought to address the
actual problem, which is that the government should not be
running air traffic control. That ought to be something that
is paid for by the airlines and by ticket fees,

(14:29):
rather than having the government involved in that at all.
There's a lot of countries that do that, and we
don't wise up, so they'll never do anything to fix
the core problems. They'll just blame the other political party
for it. And then he wants to reward and punish
those people, so he's still not going to fix it.
Still no solution, and even after they come back to work,

(14:51):
they're still short of air traffic controllers because who wants
to work for a government like this that's constantly putting
them through the wringer. Of course, the last time this happened,
what was the previous record for a shutdown, was during
Trump's first administration, and again it was the chaos in
air travel that brought that to a quick Clothes it

(15:13):
has a lot to do with it now, So he
just decides that he's going to hand out ten thousand
dollars bonuses to people who didn't take time off to
support their family. Trump then claimed he was not happy
when he saw people refusing to do unpaid work during
the shutdown. He said, look, life is not so easy

(15:34):
for anybody except for him. Except for him. Not everybody's
daddy hands them a fortune like Trump's daddy did, so
he's never had to take a second job so they
could eat. He says, look, life is not so easy
for anybody. We should have had people, should not have
had people leaving their jobs. But I basically said that

(15:59):
the ones that stayed, and there were a lot of them,
I'm sending them a ten thousand dollar bonus. Well, why
don't you give a bonus to the people in the
military that you told to go get food at German
food banks because the empire can't feed its own troops. Pathetic?
She said, Well, where's that money coming from. You're going

(16:20):
to hand them all ten thousand dollars bonuses. Where's that
money coming from? He says, I don't know. I'll get
it someplace. I always get the money from someplace regardless,
it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter, because he will rob
Peter to pay Paul. He will go into debt trillions
of dollars at a time. He set our debt bomb
on a completely new slope when he did the phony

(16:41):
pandemic lockdown and stimulus checks and all the rest of
the stuff. And Biden kept it up and same rate
of increase, and he's going to keep it up or
accelerate it, setting a new precedent this second term here, sock.
Then move move to Ingram signing a CNN report on

(17:02):
China expanding their missile facilities. She said, China is not
our friends, sir. They don't want to mess They want
to mess around with us. I can tell you that.
He said, there you go. So then they sparred on
foreign relations with Ingram saying that the Chinese spy on us,
they steal our intellectual property. Trump argued, do you think
the French are better? After Ingram said she did, Trump replied, well,

(17:27):
I'm not so sure, French. Why would you know about friends?
What about Israel? Do they spy on us? Do they
steal our technology? While we give them money? Ingram told
Trump a lot of mango folks are not thrilled about
this idea of hundreds of thousands of foreign students in
the US. She mentioned Trump's figure of as many as

(17:48):
six hundred thousand Chinese students in America. Let's play that
clip for you.

Speaker 6 (17:54):
You've said as many as six hundred thousand Chinese students
could come to the United States. Why, sir, is that
a pro maga position when so many American kids want
to go to school and there are places not for them,
and these universities are getting rich off Chinese money.

Speaker 10 (18:10):
Never said about China, but we do have a lot
of people coming in from China. We always have China
and other countries. We also have a massive system of
colleges and universities. And if we were to cut that
in half, which perhaps makes some people happy, you would
have half the colleges in the United States.

Speaker 5 (18:27):
School out of business. Well, I think that's a big deal.
You would have the United States.

Speaker 10 (18:33):
Yeah, but you would have as you know, historically, black
colleges and universities would all be out of business.

Speaker 5 (18:39):
That you would have.

Speaker 2 (18:41):
Because that's where all the Chinese go to study.

Speaker 5 (18:42):
Right, and universities US.

Speaker 10 (18:48):
But I think it's good to have outside countries. Look,
I want to be able to get along with the way.

Speaker 6 (18:54):
We're not the French, they're the Chinese. They spy on us,
they steal our intellectual problems.

Speaker 10 (18:58):
Do you think the French are better? Really, I'll tell
you I'm not so sure. We've had a lot of
problems with the French where we get taxed very unfairly
on our technology with you know, they put twenty five
percent taxes on American products. Look, assuming everyone treats us badly,
because that's the way I am. But we take in
trillions of dollars from students. You know, the students pay

(19:21):
more than double when they come in from most foreign countries.
I want to see our school system thrive. But at
the same time, I want to be I know you
and I disagree.

Speaker 5 (19:31):
We're never going to agree on it. But that's okay.

Speaker 10 (19:33):
And it's not that I want them, but I viewed
as a business. We have millions and millions of people. Also,
I want to get along with countries if possible, you
know people.

Speaker 2 (19:43):
Yeah, he really wants to get along with China, doesn't.

Speaker 10 (19:45):
Well, I stopped eight wars in the last nine months.

Speaker 5 (19:48):
Liar, I don't want to be in worse.

Speaker 2 (19:50):
Yeah, that's why you're doing what you're doing in vine Nam.

Speaker 5 (19:53):
Right, and it'll be violent. But you know what, I
don't want to be in worse.

Speaker 10 (19:56):
But one thing, you don't want to cut half of
the people, half of the students from all over the
world that are coming into our country, destroy our entire
university and college system.

Speaker 5 (20:07):
I don't want to do that.

Speaker 6 (20:08):
I listen anything.

Speaker 10 (20:09):
I don't forget. Mega was my idea. Maga was nobody
else's idea. I know what Mega wants better than anybody else.

Speaker 2 (20:15):
I'm going to have to stop it here. There's just
too many lies that he's throwing out there, one after
the other that have to be addressed. Yeah. So why
is that a pro MAGA position, sir? When so many
American kids want to go to school and there's no
place for them, and these universities are getting rich off
of Chinese money. Well, we have to do because you know,
Americans are not important. The average American is totally unimportant

(20:37):
to Trump. Have you figured that out yet? There are
the people who keep voting for this guy. They just
he treats them as if they're stupid. He could kill
somebody on Fifth Avenue. That's still to support him. He's
saying that you're stupid if you keep voting for this guy,
after the things that he says, after the things that
he does, you are stupid if you are a triple

(20:58):
MAGA voter. Come on, wake up, Wake up. The President said,
without foreign students, should have half the colleges in the
US go out of business. And she said, so what
He said, Well, I think that's a big deal. She said,
I wouldn't lose any sleep. Neither would I, because again,
are the universities the seminal problem in our society? I

(21:20):
say they are. They're not preparing anybody for jobs. These people,
his friends, his backers, his supporters, his financers, of his administration,
are working to make your college degree useless and to
put you in debt. It's just another way to make
you a debt slave. And so it's not there to

(21:42):
help you. It's not there to lift you up. And
if you want a job, you need to go out
and learn how to do some practical things. And they're
working to try to stop that as well with their robots.
And there was an exchange about that later on as well.
In terms of the American workers, he thinks you're useless eders.
He thinks you can't be trained. He's got to bring

(22:03):
people in from other places. It's the same stuff we
heard from Musk and Vivaate the snake. You know, you
had these American workers, their garbage. You know, I don't know.
You know when you look at America and you look
at places like India and China, you know, why is
our society the way that it is and their society
is the way it is, and yet the people who

(22:27):
built America I can't maintain it or take it to
the next level. We've got to the people, get the
people who built India and China. Take a look at
those countries. As were especially in China is changing very rapidly.
But just take a look at those countries. Why is
it that we need the people from there to build
what we built here? But Americans can't be trusted. They

(22:48):
want to come after Americans, folks and vinegars.

Speaker 4 (22:52):
Yeah, it's been said many times, but the Chinese routinely
engage intellectual property theft.

Speaker 3 (23:00):
That is that is how they've built.

Speaker 2 (23:02):
Their economy China price.

Speaker 4 (23:04):
Yeah, and the theft of intellectual property, whether it is
reverse engineering, taking your product bringing it to China, and
then just taking it apart, seeing how it works and
rebuilding it. Or you send your product to be built there.
Someone over there says, oh, I bet I could make
this cheaper. They reverse engineered again, make it with cheaper
parts and resell it. Or they send somebody to college

(23:27):
here in America, they come work at your company.

Speaker 3 (23:29):
For a few years, they steal all your ideas.

Speaker 4 (23:31):
And send them back to China. This happens routinely, routinely.
It's a story you hear about all the time.

Speaker 2 (23:37):
Yeah, what made America great. It's not like we're some
master race of ethnic superman or something. We had a
government that was a referee but otherwise kept a free
playing field here. People were free to nervate, free to build.
That was what made America great. And what made China great.

(23:59):
You had globe billionaires and corporatists who decided that they
were going to use China as a beta test site
for their global dominance. And so what they did was
they worked with the communist Chinese turned them into fascists,
economic fascists where they took an ownership corrupt fascism where

(24:22):
the Chinese government officials took a share of everything that
was there and you had to build what you were
going to sell them. In China, when people went there,
they engaged in intellectual property theft. They violated, they stole
the copyrights, and as they learned how to make the
stuff and set up the factories, they started doing knockoffs,
in some cases exactly the same and undetectable pirate products.

(24:45):
I remember the case of a particular brake pad company,
and the packaging and the brake pad looked exactly identical
to the American company, and yet it didn't have the
the same quality of material. It was almost like cardboard,
and people's brakes would fail, and then they would sue

(25:06):
this company because they thought they were getting the genuine
article when it was a cheap, pirated knockoff by the Chinese.
And so the Chinese price was based on currency manipulation,
slave labor, intellectual property theft, piracy, and crony capitalism or fascism,
if you will. And that was a system that was

(25:26):
set up by the globalist That's the kind of system
that they went everywhere and they that's what built China's economy.
America's economy was built on liberty and limited government. It
isn't like we're some magic race of people. We're also
not the worst people in the world. And that's the
way Trump and Musk and vaivek Ramaswami want you to

(25:49):
think of yourself. And then he goes in.

Speaker 4 (25:52):
It reached a point now where buying American is almost
a luxury to Americans. Just about anything you look at,
if you go to China, you can get a reasonable knockoff,
or not even necessarily a knockoff. Now, they shouldn't make
their own things for half the price or less. I've

(26:13):
mentioned this before, but this is a big deal in
certain markets. They're you know, knives for examples, when I've
used before, if you want to buy a high quality
American made knife, you are going to spend hundreds of dollars.
It is going to be hundreds of dollars. Or you
can get a product from China that's eighty five ninety

(26:33):
percent of the quality and a third or a quarter
of the price. And you have to start looking at
it like, at what point am I being ridiculous? Am
I being fiscally irresponsible to sit here and pay three
to four hundred dollars or a product that I could
get basically an identical knock a clone of for you know,
thirty fifty dollars.

Speaker 2 (26:55):
Yeah, you're absolutely right, and it's you know, that is
a situation that has been in neared by the China
price and by the people who want to set up
a world government and use China as the test bed
for technocracy and a technocratic control. And so then Trump
goes into his magashpiel, right, Maga, He goes, that was

(27:16):
my idea, it was nobody else's idea. Well, again, he
would be lying about that. The first use of make
America Great Again was by Ronald Reagan, the other guy
that he lied about this last week. That was in
nineteen eighty July seventeenth, nineteen eighty in a speech, Reagan said,

(27:38):
for those who have abandoned hope because there was this
general malaise under Jimmy Carter, inflation and rapidly rising energy
costs and things like that, he said, for those who
have abandoned hope, we'll restore hope, and we'll welcome them
into a great national crusade to make America great again.

(28:01):
Trump says that was his idea. No, it wasn't. And
a previous Labor Day he'd said, this country needs a
new administration that will give that dream new life and
make America great again. And make America great again was
also it wasn't just a couple of references and a
couple of speeches by Ronald Reagan. It was also on

(28:24):
their campaign buttons and on their signs. That's why when
Trump said in twenty fourteen, make America great again, I'm
going to copyright that or trademarket or whatever. And I said,
he's got to be kidding this guy. I think we're
born yesterday. I mean, that was all over the place.
That's nothing new, it's nothing fantastic about that. As a
matter of fact, it was even used by Bill Clinton.

(28:46):
Bill Clinton used it multiple times, and then Trump claimed
that he invented it, that he owned it in twenty fourteen.

Speaker 4 (28:54):
This once again goes to reaffirm I believe that Bill
Clinton was the last Republican president.

Speaker 2 (29:00):
And that's right, that's right. Yeah. The others are warmongering Democrats,
especially Trump is a Democrat socialist. So you know when
you look at the gold trimmings in his office his
palace that he wants to make it, Yeah, it's real gold.
He said, yeah, you decorate with it, and of course,

(29:20):
now Lucky Lutnik is going to use real gold to
try to back up his stable coins. You know, I
thought about that. I thought, where do they come up
with this idea of stable coin because it's a it's
not a coin, and it's tied to the dollar, so
it's obviously not stable. And I thought, well, maybe they're
talking about horse stables, and maybe they're talking about the
stuff that's on the ground and the horse stables, and

(29:41):
I'm not talking about the Hey, maybe that's what the
stable coins are. Maybe that's exactly what it is. I
think it's it's it's not bs, it's the horse stuff. Right.

Speaker 3 (29:53):
So I was a kid, I heard the term cowpie
and I got very excited. That sounds delicious, that's right.
Or we're dealing with the same sort of here.

Speaker 2 (30:01):
So Michael Flank called him out on this as well.
A lot of supporters were upset about Trump in terms
of what he was saying about how we needed to
prop up the six hundred thousand Chinese students. I don't
care if there's no place for American students to go
to college, and we need to have more colleges because
you know, they're pushing all of the things that Maga

(30:22):
is against, even pushing socialism, but especially when you look
at the moral values that are being pushed by the colleges.
It's education is not what you're getting in colleges. You're
getting in doctrination of the worst sort. So why would
we care if half of them went out of business?
Why would we care if they had to compete, they

(30:44):
had to get better. And of course the tuition that
has exploded is precisely because of the Department of Education
and the subsidy of tuition. Whenever the government subsidizes something,
guess what, it always gets more expensive, and that's college
tuition is one of the best examples of that axiom.

(31:05):
And so Michael Finn called him out and I said,
let's not give the Chinese any more leverage than they
already have. Maybe he can call down those sevenfold angels
of light for the pagan religion that he goes around
leading people in his Reawakened to America tours. So when
you look at things.

Speaker 4 (31:25):
Like his, Flynn's demons can fight whatever demons the Chinese
have gotten contact with.

Speaker 2 (31:30):
And yeah, yeah, send the Prince of Persia over there.
Yeah that's anyway. Trump's doubling down on the US's need
for Chinese students may test the durability and the double
think of his supporters and their core positions on China
and national security and all the rest of stuff. But
look when you look at the foreign workers that are there.

(31:54):
We have New York City restaurants are now hiring cashiers
from the Philippines who work from Zoom for three dollars
and seventy five cents an hour. This is what Trump
and his billionaire class want to do to Americans. They
hate you. If you're an American, Trump hates you. He
thinks you're stupid because you keep voting for him when

(32:15):
he does this kind of stuff to you. And he's right,
if you vote for him, you are stupid. Stop supporting
these people. So you have the MAGA supporters keep voting
for him. And it's very much like the Democrats who
voted for himm Danny in New York. As somebody put

(32:38):
up this meme said, the irony of voting for government
grocery stores during a government shutund Yeah, you depend on
them for your food supply. And as one of the
prophets said to the government of Israel at one point
in time. Yeah, you want to depend on Egypt, you
lean on it. You'll find that it's a cane that

(33:01):
you're leaning on that will pierce your own hand. And
that is true when you look to the government to
support you. I just ask the people on food stamps
and welfare, right, you're going to depend on government to
feed you that you're going to lean on this stick
that is going to pierce your own hand. Well, Flynn

(33:21):
had more to say. He said, sorry, mister President, if
we didn't allow six hundred thousand Chinese spies to steal
even more intellectual property and other ideas about how to
dominate our way of life, it wouldn't make a dentt
in US colleges and universities. Well, I think it would.
And the bottom line is is that you know it

(33:44):
is again, why are we giving nine billion dollars to Harvard?
I said that when Trump cut off their funds because
he didn't like the free speech criticism of the government
of Israel, And I said, why are we even You know,
so as long as they don't criticize Israel, we'll give

(34:04):
them nine billion dollars. Cut it off and leave it off.

Speaker 9 (34:08):
Just go back to only criticizing Americas.

Speaker 2 (34:11):
That's right, Yeah, he said, we simply don't need to
help the Chinese anymore where their plans to be the
sole superpower in this century. As a matter of fact,
when you look at the spy networks from China, they
are centered around universities and other things like that. He said,
let's not give the Chinese any more leverage than they
already have. They've been ripping us off for years. Because

(34:31):
of that, they have significant advantages over US now and
they have zero desire nor intent to make America great again.
Well neither Trump. Look, here's the issue. They're following the
Chinese pattern because the Chinese pattern was a beta test
for us all and we're becoming more and more like China.

(34:52):
And it's just another illustration as to why all of
this chaos is international chaos, and trade and the international
economy is all absolutely nonsense and counterproductive because Trump is
not interested really in stopping that system. They want to
become China. Every president and politician has been saying this
for quite some time, many of them out loud, and

(35:15):
so we've had George W. Bush say, well, I wish
I was like China could just tell people do what
I want to do, and they do it, and now
Trump is doing that. We heard the same thing from Trudeau.
He said, well, my favorite country, well, of course that
would be Canada, but my next favorite country is China.
It couldn't think of anything too good to say about Canada,
but he could think that what he loved about China
was the fact that they had a dictatorship there, and

(35:38):
with their dictatorship, they were going to be benevolent. They
were going to save us all from climate change and
they could just do it. And that's that they're not
doing anything about climate change. They're the dirtiest, most polluting
country on Earth because all the manufacturing has been moved
there and they've given them another aspect of the China price,
which is cheap energy. And they don't care how it is.

(36:00):
They don't care how polluted their cities are. You can
see the air pollution. You can cut it with a knife.
Or are you gonna say, Travis, It's.

Speaker 4 (36:07):
Just America and Canada have been very close allies for years,
going back at least to World War One and World
War Two. They worked very closely on a lot of things.
We are neighbors, We share a very similar cultural heritage,
These are people that we are very very similar to
in many many ways.

Speaker 3 (36:28):
I like all the memes.

Speaker 4 (36:29):
Back and forth, you know of Canada's Canadians making fun
of Americans, Americans making fun of Canadians. But the truth
is we are very much alike. If there is a
singular country that we should, by all means objectively be
allies with, it is Canada. We are so incredibly similar.
But Trump can't think of a single thing like Canada.

Speaker 3 (36:50):
Who cares? What's with them?

Speaker 11 (36:52):
Now?

Speaker 3 (36:52):
China, our friend is China.

Speaker 2 (36:54):
Yeah, he tries to do everything he can to divide
and conquer, divide America from Canada, divide Americans against Americans.
But of course we're going to keep bringing in those
Chinese students because it's necessary for the businesses of colleges
who are ripping us off and exploiting us and polluting
people's minds and destroying the spiritual and intellectual foundation of

(37:18):
our country. But we've got to have those institutions. Well,
you had a couple of people others besides Flynn, talking
about this person said this is not what Maga wants.
We don't want Chinese students spies most especially, we don't
want them propping up a massive, corrupt higher education that

(37:38):
has done so much damage to our country. Well, do
you realize that that's what your lead, your dear leader wants.
If you want to make America great again, you've got
to make a got to get Trump out of the
White House somehow. As a loyal Another has said, as
a loyal MAGA and a social scientist, I wouldn't want
a single Chinese student in America. No new students. Remove

(38:01):
those already here. Other MAGA people agree or disagree. Well,
the six hundred thousand student visas for Chinese students is
a new record that's going to be done over the
next two years. And it's a new record, and he's
not going to move back away from that. Instead, he's
going to double down on it. And then the most

(38:23):
I think amazing thing of all that he had to say,
and he was his talking points coming from his technocrac controllers.
You know, we've heard the same exact thing from Musk
and from Yveke the snake Ramaswami that Trump just endorsed
for governor of Ohio. And so Trump was talking about

(38:47):
how Americans don't have any talent.

Speaker 5 (38:50):
It's never going to be.

Speaker 10 (38:50):
A country like what we have right now, And does
that the Republicans have to talk about it at and.

Speaker 6 (38:54):
Does that mean the H one B visa thing will
not be a big.

Speaker 3 (38:58):
Priority for you?

Speaker 2 (38:59):
Yes, not just a student raise wages for me H
one bbsus.

Speaker 6 (39:02):
You can't flood the country with tens of thousands or hundreds.

Speaker 10 (39:05):
I agree, But we also do have to bring in
talent when we're gone.

Speaker 6 (39:09):
To talent and I know you don't know, you don't
we don't have talent.

Speaker 2 (39:12):
You don't know we don't have talent.

Speaker 10 (39:13):
You don't have certain talents, and you have to people
have to learn. You can't take people off an unemployment
like an unemployment line and say I'm going to put
you into a factory We're going to make missiles or
I'm going to put how do we ever.

Speaker 11 (39:24):
Do it before? Well, you and I I'll.

Speaker 5 (39:26):
Give you an example.

Speaker 10 (39:27):
In Georgia, they raided because they wanted illegal immigrants out.
They had people from from South Korea that need batteries
all their lives. You know, making batteries are very complicated
and it's not easy. There's a lot of explosions, a
lot of problems. They had like five or six hundred
people early stages to make batteries and to teach.

Speaker 5 (39:49):
People how to do it. Well, they wanted them to
get out of the country. You're going to need that lure.
I mean, I know you and I disagree on this.

Speaker 10 (39:56):
You can't just say a country's coming in, going to
best ten billion dollars to build a plant and going
to take people off an unemployment line who haven't worked
in five years, and they're going to start making the missiles.

Speaker 5 (40:08):
It doesn't work that well, it.

Speaker 2 (40:11):
Doesn't work that way. You know, Americans, you can't train Americans.
You know, what's the point of putting an American in college?
They can't learn anything. They're too stupid because they vote
for Trump. He's just looking at his voters and his
oil supporters, and he thinks all Americans are that stupid.
We're not all about stupid, you mafia figure. And many
people posted that up and said, you know, we had

(40:32):
housewives who went in during World War two and they
started making planes and tanks. They could be trained. He
had Rosie the Riveter, which is a meme that maybe
Trump has never seen, but all many conservatives would argue
that admitting six hundred thousand Chinese students to prop up
American in doctrination farms also known as universities, goes against

(40:55):
the American first philosophy. Trump said during his appearance that
that is a pro MAGA move. Actually, yeah, that's how
bad things have gotten with Trump and with the MAGA people.
It's amazingly stupid, isn't it. Well, Travis, whyn't you go
down our comments here? Let's take a look at what
people have been saying.

Speaker 4 (41:17):
Let's see, let's see what I've been sent. I know
we have some tips from Marquie Mark, and I'll get
to those first. Let me find them real fast, all
right here at Markey Mark and in New Jersey. Thank
you very much, Marky Mark. He says, I wasn't advocating
becoming monsters the other day. I was advocating for our
own protection. Others want to harm us and our country,

(41:38):
So we need an intel agency to find these bad actors.

Speaker 2 (41:41):
Yeah. That was at the very end of the show,
and I just came back and I said, yeah, we're
becoming the monsters that we fight because when I look
at it, I just got to say, I understand the
argument for an intelligence agency, but how has that worked
out for us? We have had the CIA NSA created
by this horrible President Truman, who created this whole fantasy

(42:04):
of national security state. This is a guy who dropped
nuclear bombs on civilians and created the national security state
here in America. And from their inception, the CIA and
the NSA were targeting Americans, spying on Americans without warrants.
That's why we had the Church Committee hearings and the
Pie Committee hearings. They distracted everybody by dropping a lot

(42:27):
of information about their failed assassination attempts, their failed coups,
and all the rewards that they had started. And then
they passed the FISA Act. And then these very same people,
these crooks, these criminals, these spies, spies are the most
despicable people in a society. Yes they used them during
times of war, and yes we are in a perpetual war,

(42:50):
but you don't ever trust a spy, not even your
own spies. And instead, what they have done is they
took that law that was used to supposedly going to
stop them from spying on Americans, the FAIZA Act, and
they use it to give them legal cover to continue
spying on mister and missus Verizon and all the rest
of us they have started one war after the other.

(43:12):
They've been engaged in assassinations and coups, and not all
the assassinations were failed attempts like with Castro unfortunately, but
when you look at their coups, they have all been
failures even if they succeeded. Take a look at Iran,
we have the iyatolas because of the CIA. The CIA
and the intelligence agencies ought to go. They have no

(43:33):
place in a just and moral society. You would never
have a system with these types of institutions and at
this dark government. You would never have that in a
government that was run by our founders, and it is
absolutely antithetical to what we want to have in our
leadership and in our government. I remember there was a quote.

(43:56):
I don't have the specific so who it was that
said it, but it's very early on. It was either
an American or a British person who was a part
of military intelligence, where they are looking at the military
strength of other countries and that type of stuff and
where they're positioned and where they're moving, just to be
informed if we're going to be attacked. That type of intelligence,
not going out and creating LSD and dropping it into

(44:17):
people's drinking water supplies and stuff like that, like the
CIA does and mk ultra assassination programs. But anyway, somebody
said something to they were talking about what they're going
to do, and his response was, I'm sorry, but gentlemen
don't read other gentlemen's mail. We've come a long way
from that, haven't we. There used to be some moral standards.

(44:40):
We don't have any moral standards. That's the problem with America.
We become a criminal empire. We don't care about the
just war anymore. All we want is just war, just war.
It's what these people want, not one that is justified.
And that's my concern about it. And there is.

Speaker 4 (44:57):
He goes on, says, Christianity tea teaches us about sin nature,
that humans are inherently bad.

Speaker 3 (45:03):
Just because we might leave others alone doesn't mean they'll
leave us alone. We need to remember that.

Speaker 2 (45:07):
Yes, Madison said, men are not angels, and so therefore
we need to have government. But because men are not angels,
and because the government is going to be run by men,
how do we watch them? Who watches these watchers, who
watches the CIA in the NSA, Guess what nobody does?
They're running the drug wars. They're running the terrorist wars.
They're running the terrorist that Trump spent Memorial Day with

(45:31):
Veterans Day. The guy that was running cover for al
Qaeda has been involved with all of these terrorist organizations
Isis al Nusra. They put him in charge of Syria
after we used air cover when the battle was running down.
I showed you pictures of a ten warthogs that were
doing air cover for these Syrian quote unquote rebels. They're

(45:56):
actually ISIS and al Qaeda people. And then they put
and Isis Alcotta guy in and now he's in the
White House and Trump is meeting with him on Veterans Day.
You know what kind of screwed up idea is that
for a government. It is not what we want to imagine.
It is these people have no moral standards whatsoever. Yes,

(46:19):
men have a fallen nature and they have a dual nature,
except for the politicians have one nature, and that's fallen nature.
And again, who watches these people? How are they control?
There is no control on our government. Our government is
a feral government. That's how you spell federal. Now f
E R A L is like a feral pack of
dogs that used to be your friend. Your servant. But

(46:43):
now they're running in a pack and if you stay
him in the neighborhood, they'll rip you to shreds. That's
what the federal government is.

Speaker 9 (46:50):
Yeah, it's I think a big problem is having the
actual agency that only does spy work. It's if there
is a need for intelligence, which sometimes there is, if
the enemy is attacking you, that should be handled, you know,
within the greater military, where there's oversight for it.

Speaker 2 (47:11):
Well, I think the greater need lance is that you
have this whole fantasy of a national security state that
Truman created and the idea that we got to keep
everything secret. And it all began with that little core
of the NSA and the CIA. As a matter of fact,
for the longest time, the NSA, everybody would joke, stood
for no such agency. And when they had those hearings,

(47:32):
and Frank Church looked at the CIA, and you had
Congressman Pike looked at the NSA. When he brought in
the NSA, he said, I you know, they talked about
the CIA charter. They said, I'd like to see your charter.
You were created by executive order from Truman, and the

(47:52):
NSA had said, I'm not going to show you. There's
absolutely no oversight. You can't even see the executive order
that created the essay. A Congressman's not allowed to see it,
and so there's absolutely no oversight. Everything under this national
security nonsense. Everything is secret, top secret. Can't tell you
it's all compartmentalized. That kind of lack of transparency, lack

(48:15):
of sunshine, lack of oversight, is what has given us
a blank check for the most corrupt government the world
has ever seen. And Israel is just like the two
of them are twins. It's all about national security. Everything
is secret, and that is a recipe for disaster because

(48:36):
no one is watching the watchers. You're not even allowed
to ask them questions. That's the reality of the I
despise a national security state. It's the worst part of
the government that I despise in Washington. You're not going
to change my mind on this.

Speaker 9 (48:52):
It reminds me of the thing with Tucker Carlson's father.
You know what they created to propagandize other countries and
then they start bringing it in. You need to have
limitations on these agencies like the CIA. If it exists
and is allowed to continue to grow, it is eventually
going to be used on American citizens. It needs to

(49:14):
be very Any spy activity needs to be very limited,
very observed by politicians and by the military structure, rather
than having a separate CIA thing. Is what I would
say about this, And.

Speaker 2 (49:28):
That's why I don't trust anybody that used to work
for the CIA. I mean, you know, I've interviewed Joint
Kyaku multiple times because they send him to jail because
he told the truth about him, and he'll tell you
some of the truth. He'll tell you the truth about
him now, But in general, don't I don't like to
give a platform to people like that, and I don't
trust people like Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones who have
CIA and their family. I'm telling you, it's a cult.

(49:51):
It's a click, it's a crime family, and they keep
it close, just like the mafia does. It's organized crime.
And they have been the criminal intelligence agency from their inception.

Speaker 9 (50:06):
Ahead also want to say thank you Mark.

Speaker 2 (50:09):
Mark.

Speaker 9 (50:09):
We aren't upset. Yeah, you're an oppression. We are upset
at the government thinking Lance.

Speaker 2 (50:14):
Yeah, I'm not upset with you. I just that is
a raw nerve. I absolutely detest the CIA, say it
without spitting so let's go back to the questions. Go ahead, Travis.

Speaker 3 (50:29):
Got Oudi m r rs.

Speaker 4 (50:30):
As long as priverty taxes are a thing, Americans will
never own their homes.

Speaker 2 (50:34):
That's right out right. But they're going to double down
on it.

Speaker 9 (50:36):
Now.

Speaker 2 (50:38):
We'll make sure that you never get rid of your
property tax and you'll never even get rid of your mortgage.
I mean, that was one of the things, and we've
talked about this for a long time. I'm going to
get a thirty year mortgage. At the rate the property
taxes are going up and the value of the dollar
is going down pretty soon, you know, it makes it
a little bit easier for you to pay your your mortgage.
Time goes on because inflation if you're still have a

(50:58):
job and and you your job is keeping up with inflation.
But when it comes to property taxes and insurance, they
got you there, and so that becomes the dominant force.
But now Trump wants to keep you indebted to the
banks forever as well, and we'll talk about where that's
that case. It's very interesting where this idea for a
fifty year mortgage came from. And we talk about that,

(51:21):
and we'll talk about the economic aspects of it. When
we come back.

Speaker 4 (51:25):
But go ahead, yeah, he finishes, says, government will be
there forever landlord. Awesome, King says, add it to property tax.

Speaker 3 (51:35):
Number twenty twenty nine.

Speaker 4 (51:36):
Fifty year mortgages we follo, followed by thirty year auto loans.

Speaker 2 (51:39):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (51:40):
I don't think that we can be giving out auto loans.
You're not going to get to drive anywhere.

Speaker 2 (51:43):
Yeah, they don't want you to give to own a car.

Speaker 4 (51:45):
Yeah, so equals you'll own nothing and be happy paying
your masters for your very existence.

Speaker 3 (51:52):
Fifty your mortgages will double the price of.

Speaker 2 (51:54):
Houses, absolutely does.

Speaker 4 (51:56):
Over there already people, I've already seen people in lining.
This is actually a good thing. If you're smart, you're
going to be paying less each month, and just yeah,
you're a sucker. These companies work on long timelines. They're
able to sit there and look at it. Go all right,
so we're going to make a little bit less each month,
but we're going to have you for your entire life.

(52:19):
You were going to be paying us until the day
you die.

Speaker 2 (52:23):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (52:24):
You will never be out from underneath them.

Speaker 2 (52:26):
Yeah. As a matter of fact, I ran through Travis
and I've got it coming up a dollar buck for
dollar analysis. I looked up to see what the median
home price is because you look at median because when
you got somebody's building palaces like Trump and Jeffrey Epstein,
it kind of ups the average. So you look at
the median price, right, and then you look at what
the average interest rate is, and look at it for

(52:49):
a thirty year mortgage, look at it for a fifteen
year mortgage. Because a shorter mortgage, like a fifteen year mortgage,
the interest rates are lower because their risk is less.
And if you're going to go and add another twenty
years to it, I said, okay, well let's just add
the differential between the fifteen and thirty right now, we'll
add that to the average thirty year rate. And so
I ran through the numbers, and you're going to be

(53:11):
amazed at what the numbers are. You talk about a scam.
It's the essence of a scam. But you know, we
talked numbers. Yeah, and when you talk about the property tax,
remember Donald Rainwater in Indiana, who's run for governor twice.
There's a libertarian. He had a great solution. He said, Okay,
so let's say that you know seven percent of your

(53:34):
house is going to be the property tax, and you
pay it once instead of every single year. And so
what you could do is you could have that seven
percent folded into the cost of the mortgage and advertise
it over thirty years or however long it is. Or
you could pay one percent for seven years and then
you're done. You pay it once and you're done. And

(53:55):
that was his proposal, and unfortunately, people didn't vote for that.
They voted for more of the same. They voted for
slavery and perpetual taxation. He was a perfectly rational guy
who wanted limited constitutional government. People won't vote for that.
They are tribal and well, I've always voted Republican, I've

(54:17):
always voted Democrat, and I'm afraid if I don't vote
for my tribe that the other tribe is going to
dominate us and they're really, really bad. So I can't
vote for somebody who's actually going to free things up.
That's why I'm no longer involved in politics.

Speaker 3 (54:33):
Go ahead, Shelley A.

Speaker 4 (54:35):
Says, and not only paying forever, you're responsible for all
the repairs in upkeep.

Speaker 3 (54:39):
What a great deal.

Speaker 2 (54:40):
That's not wonderful right now if you don't keep it
up they'll come around with their code inspectors and I'll
hit you with fines and take your home. Saw that
on the lower end of homes in Florida.

Speaker 9 (54:50):
Yeah, it's like renting but worse.

Speaker 2 (54:52):
Yeah. Yeah.

Speaker 4 (54:55):
Neburu twenty twenty nine s is Trump's defaulted on every
loan he's ever had, and he's.

Speaker 2 (55:02):
Going to default on the loan at all. The thirty
eight trillion dollars a debt you just watched that may
happen under his watch. I think he's the perfect guy
for that.

Speaker 4 (55:10):
As a matter of fact, Soylent Goy says, is GDP
the best indicator of a good economy or a cost
of living versus the average income?

Speaker 2 (55:18):
I think you're right about that second one. I think
that'd be a better indicator of the good economy. GDP
is what the government wants. They want to see a
lot of activity that they can tax and that sort
of thing. From our perspective, it's cost of living versus
average income. But from their perspective, as the owners, they
want to see GDP.

Speaker 4 (55:40):
And to five tire at seventeen seventy six, as I
was looking for an American made coffee maker, all the
China made ones were thirty bucks or so. I found
two American made ones well over one hundred dollars. Government
did this on purpose, That's what he says, and that's
in everything I've said.

Speaker 2 (55:55):
We used to be able to manufacture here because we
had freedom, because we didn't have regulations that tied everybody down.
I watched this happen with my family. My grandfather during
the depression started making home remedy medicines in the backyard
with his sons, and then as things moved on, they
built a factory. They started doing private label manufacturing for

(56:17):
perfume companies and other things like that. They made their
own line of perfume stuff that was sold mail order,
and I watched the government like a boa constrictor, destroyed
that business, as they do every manufacturing business that is
out there. You can't have a business now now with Trump.
That even came after the service industries, the nail salons,
the hair salons got to shut down everything. Americans can

(56:41):
have nothing. And they're going to bring in people to
replace us. Bring in people to replace us in the universities,
bring in people to replace us, and work from the
top to the bottom, even bringing in people to tele
work and pay them three dollars and seventy five cents
to do the cash shuring in New York City.

Speaker 4 (57:03):
Yeah, I recently had to buy a new backpack. My
old backpack was you know, slightly over a decade. It's
got busted zippers all over the place and isn't really
functional as a backpack anymore. And I was doing some research.
The American made backpacks are in the hundreds of dollars,
two to four hundred dollars. The one I got is

(57:25):
from a specifically Chinese brand. They don't do knockops, they
do their own thing. But on sale, I was able
to get this backpack, which is you know, same quality,
for thirty five dollars, as opposed to spending two hundred
and fifty to four hundred dollars for something to carry,
you know, my clothes or pieces of.

Speaker 3 (57:43):
You know, gear for the show around. Yeah, and that's
just when you're looking at it. Can you afford to
make that?

Speaker 4 (57:50):
You know, if you've got unlimited supply of money, if
you're wealthy and you're free to distribute that wealth to
the American companies, that's great. But the average person cannot
make that sacrifice. They cannot look at that and go,
I can't afford to take that hit. I don't have
the kind of money to sit around and say, you
know what, I will spend an extra two hundred and

(58:10):
thirty dollars on this backpack that is simply going to
carry my clothes.

Speaker 2 (58:14):
Yeah, that's right, It's just it's not a ver. And
then the reason is why is it so expensive? Again,
it's going to be even more expensive because of tariffs,
and if they can even get the part, all the
parts that they need because you can't source all. We
have destroyed American manufacturing so much that most people can't
source all the parts that they need to actually do
domestic manufacturing, and so that creates uncertainty and expense, and

(58:39):
these people are being put out of business due to
that thanks to Trump. But the reality is is that
you know they have You're not going to undo a
system that's been put in place over many, many decades,
and you're not going to do it overnight. And the
biggest enemy, if you go back to Pogo, we have
met the enemy and they is us, the US government.

(59:03):
The US government is the one are the ones who
have regulated are manufacturing out of existence and they're not
doing anything to fix that, just like they're not doing
anything to lower the cost of housing by pulling back
on the regulations and the mandates of building houses. Let
people decide what kind of cars they want and what
kind of houses they want. If somebody wants something that

(59:24):
is unbelievably energy efficient and bulletproof and all this other
kind of stuff, if they got the money, go for it.
But they ought to let the market decide, not some
federal bureaucracy should not decide what kind of car you're
going to be allowed to have or what kind of
home you're going to be allowed to have. You ought
to be able to build it yourself. And just go
back and think about what even the local officials did

(59:46):
after the massive floods that went through Asheville. You had
Amish organizations who went there and built wooden houses for
these people. And then you have the local building code
people come in and say, well, well that's not up
to our code, and you don't have running water and electricity,
so tear it down. That type of stuff, and government

(01:00:08):
is the biggest obstacle of this stuff. They want you
upset with the Chinese and with foreign countries, and they
want to tell you that they're the ones that are
responsible for your declining standard of living. The ones who
are responsible for your declining standard of living are people
like Trump and his backers, the Democrats and Republicans who
are in Washington, and the people who are in the

(01:00:29):
local government even they are the ones who are strangling
your cost of living. Let's start with that. That's the
first thing we could do.

Speaker 3 (01:00:38):
Go ahead, Yeah, let's see, do we have more comments?

Speaker 2 (01:00:42):
We do?

Speaker 4 (01:00:43):
Indeed, Doug A seven, has Trump never heard of job training?
Apparently not currently. He believes you're innately born with the
skills that you need to do certain jobs, and if
you're not born with him, you just can't do them.

Speaker 2 (01:00:54):
Well, obviously he never had any job training for his
businesses because he he bankrupted six Casino, So you've got
training on that.

Speaker 3 (01:01:02):
No, it's impossible to learn things. I've never learned anything.

Speaker 2 (01:01:05):
No one can tell me about projection.

Speaker 4 (01:01:07):
Yeah, that's it, Star Barkley says, Trump admitting failure of
government run schools.

Speaker 2 (01:01:12):
That is.

Speaker 4 (01:01:14):
That is very true, and the government runs schools are
a complete and total failure. Markey Mark in New Jersey says,
thanks to the compelling arguments over feral cats, and.

Speaker 3 (01:01:24):
Dogs will leave alone more than the federal government ever will.

Speaker 2 (01:01:28):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (01:01:30):
Feral cats and dogs are much more pleasant to deal with.

Speaker 2 (01:01:34):
You can actually you can actually train them to be nice,
unlike the federal government, the feral government.

Speaker 4 (01:01:40):
I got myself the federal dog a few years ago,
part of the part of the squad.

Speaker 3 (01:01:45):
Yeah, eat the Internet one time, though, patriot.

Speaker 4 (01:01:50):
The intelligence agencies are a prime example of power corrupts,
and absolute power corrupts absolutely, even if their intentions are
good at the beginning.

Speaker 3 (01:01:57):
Men should not have that much power. Yes, that is
the essence of it.

Speaker 2 (01:02:02):
I'm sure that is it.

Speaker 4 (01:02:04):
Okay, quickly before we take a break, can I there's
something that's been kind of weighing on my mind for
a while. I like to most of you have probably
heard this term, some of you may have not, but
the concept of sort of no bless obleege, you know,
the obligation of the nobility.

Speaker 3 (01:02:19):
Yeah, and I see us.

Speaker 4 (01:02:24):
This audience and people of similar mind have a sort
of no bless obleege to the fools in Maga. It's
very easy to get mad at them, to want to
scream at them, shake them, and you know, lose your
mind at them. But to some extent, I personally, I'm
trying to cultivate a sense of you know, it is
my duty. You know, maybe they didn't have the benefit

(01:02:46):
of good father who understood this and was able to
prime me, or you know, they had other aspects of
their life where it didn't turn out properly or whatever.
But they don't see this, they don't understand. And if
we just sit and we mock them, and we yell
at them, we scream at them whatever, we're never going
to make any headway. They might be blind, they might
be dumb, but if they're blind and dumb, they need

(01:03:10):
somebody to help them see through it. And it's very easy,
it's very, very easy to want to scream at them.

Speaker 2 (01:03:17):
It's very much why I have you on the show, Travis,
because I'm done with these people I've been screaming on
for five years. It's like, if you can't see it
by now, you're ever going to see it because you
don't want to see it. You want to be part
of this club. You want to be that's your tribal identity.
You found your tribe and you're going to live in that.
And so, yeah, I'm done with these people. But I'm

(01:03:37):
glad that you still want to talk to them. We
need somebody who's going to talk to them, not going
to be me, not going to be me. Well, we're
going to take a quick break and thank you, and
you can be There are no bless oblige part of
the show here. We'll be right back, folks.

Speaker 8 (01:03:50):
Unlike most revolutions, whether people rise against the real economic oppression,
in our case, here in Boston, we are fighting for
purely an abstract principle. It is, however, not nearly so
abstract as the young gentleman supposes. The issue involved here
is one of monopolies. Today, the British government will monopolize

(01:04:16):
the sale of tea in our country.

Speaker 11 (01:04:18):
Tomorrow it will be something else, liberty.

Speaker 1 (01:05:11):
It's your move. You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 12 (01:05:21):
Whether you're feeling like the booze or bluegrass. APS Radio
has you covered. Check out a wide variety of channels
on our app at APS radio dot com.

Speaker 2 (01:05:38):
All right, and we're back, are there, Travis?

Speaker 3 (01:05:41):
Yes, I am here. Welcome back, folks.

Speaker 4 (01:05:43):
I can't hear the break, so I'm in the arsenal.
We're coming back. I just have to guess I take
my cues based on you know, how much talking you're doing.
But I want to let people know that they go
to Homestead Products dot Chop there having another say going
on right now. They're selling freeze dried or organic goat

(01:06:04):
milk powder, not freeze dried. The freeze dried was previously
that was the eggs, but now it is organic goat
milk powder. And of course you can mix this yourself.
Goat milk is very nutritious and it's also generally if
people have issues with dairy, goat milk tends to affect
them less. So if you have issues with cow's milk,
you may not have issues with goats milk. It's not

(01:06:25):
a guarantee, but that seems to be the way it
is for a lot of people. And you can put
this into all kinds of things, whether it's smoothies for
extra protein, or coffee as your creamer. You can use
it many many different ways. You can try it in
your favorite recipes. Whatever they are. See if this goat
milk powder will work for you.

Speaker 2 (01:06:43):
Yeah, they have some great program products. I love the
products that they do there.

Speaker 4 (01:06:47):
Yeah, and of course home sead Products dot shop make
sure that all their products are very high quality, made
in America. They have a commitment to no hormones in
any of the food products that they use. So you
go to Homestead Proust Shop check out their special on
the freeze dried goat milk.

Speaker 3 (01:07:04):
It's high quality, you'll love it.

Speaker 4 (01:07:06):
So it's twelve ninety nine right now and with the
promo code Night, you get ten percent off anything that
they have in shop.

Speaker 3 (01:07:12):
So go check out Homestead Products dot shop.

Speaker 4 (01:07:15):
And of course if you'd like to support the show
directly and go to Davidnight dot news and see all
the ways of doing that.

Speaker 2 (01:07:20):
There.

Speaker 4 (01:07:20):
A really good way is to send a donation directly
on rumble to make sure we see it and we
will read out your comment. Whatever you want to talk about,
you'll get a direct answer. You'll get it as quickly
as we can. And in fact, we have one of
those right now. So I want to say thank you
to Scott Helmer. That was very generous. We appreciate it.
It says David, prayers for you and your family to

(01:07:42):
everyone listening. Tell the people you love how much you
love them.

Speaker 3 (01:07:45):
Every day. Life can change in a moment.

Speaker 2 (01:07:47):
Yes, yeah, thank you, And again check out Scott he's
got great music on YouTube. He's on all the different
different streaming services that are there, and he's also got
to website and he's got the like minded individual. He's
got songs about the pandemic and other things like that
that he wrote a lot of different topics.

Speaker 4 (01:08:09):
But yeah, checking out Scott Gott Helmer. Scott spelled as
you would expect, and Helmer is H E.

Speaker 11 (01:08:15):
L E.

Speaker 3 (01:08:16):
M as in Matthew E. R. Scott Helmer.

Speaker 4 (01:08:20):
I want to make sure that you can you have
the spelling just in case you want to look it up.
It's pretty intuitive, but sometimes things are a bit tricky.

Speaker 2 (01:08:28):
Yes, Well, you know, while we're talking about organic goat's milk,
what biggg is doing and they treat it as a
win win. You know, we're right here after just after
trick or Treat and all the candy. There's an article
on Children's Self Defense about how it's become something of
a partnership between the candy companies and the Big Egg people.

(01:08:52):
They are feeding leftover candy to cattle. And if you
look at the picture of this, they got these chocolate
bars and the cattle in the background. I wonder if
you feed them chocolate bars. If we get chocolate milk,
what do you think? Probably not, but who knows what
you get? Actually, candy companies overproduce, of course, and farmers

(01:09:14):
feed the leftovers to the livestock, saying that it is
a sustainable solution. But of course Children's Health Defense looks
a little bit deeper at this and says, you know,
why is it that we have the systemic system like
this of unhealthy food. Well, a lot of it has
to do with the cheap corn subsidies coming again from

(01:09:36):
the federal government, the high fruitose corn syrup that is there.
And there's disagreement between the people who are looking at this.
Some people say, well, I think that's fine. You know,
you need to have this sugar in the gut of
the of the cattle helps them to and when their
stomach helps them to digest this stuff. Others say that

(01:09:59):
it is not healthy for them or for their products.
But while this is all happening, you know, of course,
the bigger issue is that now the Trump Egg Secretary
just unilaterally authorized without any evaluation whatsoever, mRNA vaccines for
all the animals. Right, So all your meat, your milk,

(01:10:22):
all these different products, whether you're talking about pork or chicken.
They are injecting all these animals with mRNA. I'm much
more worried about that and them being fed candy bars.
So a lot of them will say they're empty, their
nutritionally void and that type of thing, but others say, well, no,
it's actually a good thing. So talking about recycling, let's

(01:10:48):
take a look at recycled censorship. You know, for the
longest time, we've talked about the horrific Face Act that
was set up to shut down any protests or any
people who are standing there at abortion centers to talk
to people. You know, you can't do that in the US.
You got to get back a certain distance. And we've

(01:11:10):
seen that under the Biden administration that Face Act was
really abused. They came after people who were in compliance
with a Face Act and they still prosecuted them. And
so it's the issue is whether or not in the
Face Act is in compliance with the Constitution in the
first Amendment, and of course it isn't at all. And

(01:11:32):
now what you have are some protesters Code Pink, which
is not happy about what's going on in Gaza and
the genocide that is there. And I'm not happy with
that either. But they've taken a very confrontational approach, and
there have been there's a lot of churches who basically
they worship the political state of Israel instead of the

(01:11:54):
Lord Jesus Christ. That's what Zionism is. And so as
part of their worship service of a political foreign government,
Code Pink then comes in and disrupts it, and they
do it by stages to make it even more disruptive.
They don't all do it at once. You'll have somebody
stand up and do it, and then after all the

(01:12:14):
commotion they take them out. Then another person will come
up and do that. And so that has a very
very annoying process of doing that, and I don't think
that changes anybody's minds. And so I don't support either
Code Pink or these Zionist churches.

Speaker 4 (01:12:34):
As a support rule if you were if you're going
to protest something, don't be obnoxious.

Speaker 3 (01:12:40):
Yeah, don't be obnoxious.

Speaker 4 (01:12:42):
These people that sit in the highways, yeah, I have
no sympathy for them.

Speaker 2 (01:12:47):
That's why you know, when you look at most of
these protests, I think they're counter productive.

Speaker 3 (01:12:50):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:12:52):
It's hard because you'll see these people saying the highway
and you starts even getting abused by the cops, and
it's just should that be happening. No, but it's hard
not to feel a sense of Yeah, get these idiots
out of the highway, get these people off the road.

Speaker 3 (01:13:04):
People have lives to lead.

Speaker 4 (01:13:06):
If you were going to protest the government, do not
make people sympathize with the government. Don't make them cheer
for the boot when it comes down on you.

Speaker 3 (01:13:15):
You have to be the type of person.

Speaker 4 (01:13:17):
You have to be better than the people you are protesting.

Speaker 3 (01:13:20):
You have to be a better alternative.

Speaker 2 (01:13:22):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (01:13:22):
You can't sit there in the highway and make people go. Yeah,
they have some good points.

Speaker 4 (01:13:26):
I think if we were to turn power over to
these people, if they were to get in charge, things
to be better.

Speaker 2 (01:13:31):
They're focused on disruption, not on debate. And they don't
change anybody's minds. If anything, as you point out, they
push them in the wrong direction. And I've seen this
since the Vietnam War protests. I didn't support the Vietnam War.
I could see what was happening to people that were
slightly older than I was, and yet when you looked
at these protests that were being done, it's like, and

(01:13:53):
I can understand why the middle aged people would instinctively
then push back against that and support the government, and
it's war because they were so reprehensible. And this, again,
I think is very reprehensible.

Speaker 9 (01:14:05):
So what protests focus on, disruption are really all about
division for the people. It's about furvoring the left right
divide that they then use to push tyranny. It's always, well,
look at how crazy the people on the other side are.

Speaker 2 (01:14:21):
That's right. It's like the Black Lives Matter stuff again.
You know, that was there to promote division, not to
solve a problem. You got a problem the way that
the police are treating people, both black and white. Let's
do something about that. Instead, what they were going to
do is to make out a black versus white issue.

Speaker 9 (01:14:37):
And in order to do that, they chose someone who
had odeed on fentanyl that he took before he was
arrested and made him their poster child for everything. And
then people rightly pointed out that no, he wasn't murdered.
He odd and then that was you know, the other
side is all like, oh, well, then you're a racist

(01:14:58):
if you will support people being murdered. They could have
chosen any number of people that get killed and murdered
even by the cops all the time, both white and black,
but instead they chose someone who oweded.

Speaker 2 (01:15:11):
That's right. This is why I say. You know, when
we talk about means versus end, you know, you can
be right on the issue, you can be right on
the goal that you want to have, but if the
means that you use is so reprehensible, that's going to
work against the end that you want to achieve. And
I see that in the way that Trump is handling
this immigration issue. I agree that the illegal immigrants need

(01:15:33):
to be sent home, they need to be taken off
of welfare, first of all, But the way that they're
doing this and we just had a baby pepper sprayed
by these people, Now, how in the world can you
ever justify that? And yet you got maga people out
there who are doing it saying I voted for this,
and it's like, well, I just don't know how much

(01:15:53):
more reprehensible that is, Travis than somebody, you know, they
see a baby getting pepper sprayed in the face voted
for this. This is what I want. Let's have more
law enforcement like that. I think it's important for the
law enforcement to actually follow the law themselves. So What
is happening now is that the Face Act, which was

(01:16:14):
put in place so that planned parenthood could kill babies,
is now being grabbed by these Christian organizations to say
we want the Face Act so that we can cheer
on and support Israel killing babies in Gaza after they've
been born. Right, this is the insanity and the Face
Act is a direct affront to the First Amendment. It's

(01:16:37):
a direct affront to the freedom of religion as well
as a freedom of speech and a protest. And the
way these people are doing this, Because of the way
that they're doing it, they are causing these issues. And
so you've got these neo Christians. I guess we could
call them trashing the First Amendment for pragmatic reasons. Maybe not,

(01:17:00):
but maybe geo Christians. Right, they're all about land, that's
what they worship. Texas pro life activists took a page
from the California environmental activists to functionally ban abortion in
a lone star state by outsourcing civil litigation to private
citizens so that abortion clinics couldn't sue public officials to

(01:17:22):
block the bill. Red states repeated the environmental trick this
year through bills targeting abortion pills as contaminants of drinking water,
now the bane of pro life activists for over thirty years.
The Face Act is being fashioned to protect Christian and
Jewish congregations whose faith compels them to support Israel, and

(01:17:44):
of course that is true. They worship a political foreign
entity rather than the Lord Jesus Christ. Don't call yourself
a Christian if you're worshiping Benjamin Netanyahu in his government. Okay,
call yourself something else. First, Liberty Institute filed a Freedom
of Access to Clinic Entrance Act lawsuit that's the Face

(01:18:06):
Act against hostile agitators affiliated with Code pink on behalf
of the Christian and Jewish Alliance, the Mission Church of Carlsbad,
and a Jewish worshiper, Ruth Mastron, alleging that they carried
out illegal campaign of disruption and harassment against three worship services.
We just want to be able to gather safely, pray

(01:18:28):
and worship together without fearing for our lives. Well, if
people are threatening you, that is assault, and there's always
been laws against that, and that is a very different
issue than shutting down speech. I disagree adamantly with the
Face Act. This is politics masquerading as religion. Folks, they said,

(01:18:52):
they're holding people who were holding a vulgar sign, jumped
on the hood of our car, dreamed, and they hung
on the windshield. They said of the service, Well, again,
that is not speech, that is action right, and there's
laws against that already. You don't need to shut down
free speech because of that. The Federal Face Act makes

(01:19:15):
it unlawful for any person to use the force or
threat of force or physical obstruction to intentionally injure or
intimidate a person because he or she is lawfully expressing
the right of religious freedom at a place of worship
or obtaining or providing reproductive health services. And then interesting
that when they wrote the Face Act, first they said, well,

(01:19:36):
we're going to protect churches, and yeah, they've never used
it to protect churches. They've never used it to protect
pregnancy crisis, pregnancy centered counseling, They've never used it for
any of that. They've only used it to protect the
ritualized killing of babies. Yeah, that religious right ore ite

(01:19:58):
of the Democrat Party. The legislation has rarely been used
to protect churches or pro life. I don't know of
any cases where they've used it to do that. And
so they have gone after people who have stood on
the sidelines holding signs, peacefully protesting the mass murder of
children that our government not only allows but would fund.

(01:20:22):
And so again, the solution is to end the Face Act,
to keep the First Amendment, is not to continually attack
the First Amendment and to take this anti free speech
thing and repurpose it for your own censorship purposes. The
Heritage Foundation has called the Face Act an ideological weapon

(01:20:45):
designed to suppress ordinary pro life activity and expression. And
the GOP House Judiciary Committee approved a Face Act repeal
build this summer, but it hasn't gone anywhere since. And
so now what they are doing, the Zionists are using
this wielding this ideological weapon for their purposes. Isn't it
interesting that all the people who want to shut down

(01:21:07):
free speech or people also want to kill babies, either
in the womb or in gaza. It would make it
a lot more difficult to hold violent agitators and intimidating
anti semites accountable under the law. If Congress appealed the
Face Act, said one consonance, so let's keep.

Speaker 9 (01:21:25):
It, they would have to actually do something that was
assault or a crime.

Speaker 2 (01:21:28):
Yeah, that's right. You know, this is the Face Act,
like Rico Statutes, is a legal abomination that is in
defiance of the principles of the Constitution and the letter
of the law. Both Face Act and Rico are put
in with an argument for expediency. Well, we don't want

(01:21:51):
to have to go through and charge them for the
actual crimes. Let's just use this, create this new weapon.
You know, with Rico Statutes, we can go in and
we can and confiscate your money before we find you guilty.
And then eventually, before you know it, you've got civil
asset forfeiture. Well they're not even charging you with anything.
They just steal your property and defy you to come

(01:22:12):
back and sue them to get it back. They say
that your property has committed a crime known to an
order of generation for its anti war disruption during George W.
Bush's presidency. Code Pink has been around for a couple
of decades and they are known also for their obnoxious,

(01:22:32):
counterproductive protests. The defendi's actions have created that it's Code
Pink create a culture of anxiety and fear with them
both the Church and the Alliance, causing them to cancel
religious events and expand additional resources to ensure the safety
of their members. Well, you should always assure the safety

(01:22:53):
of your members, especially if your church it's a soft
chart target, and if you don't take those precautions, then
it's really criminally negligent. So these people, these Christians, nominally
are actually selling the censorship rope, the anti free speech,

(01:23:16):
anti freedom of religion rope that will be used to
hang them.

Speaker 9 (01:23:20):
I'm okay with not being allowed to criticize Israel so
long as I'm allowed to not be I'm okay with
not being allowed to criticize abortion as long as other
people aren't allowed to criticize Israel.

Speaker 2 (01:23:30):
Is what they're saying. That's right, that's right because they
don't care about life, they really don't. So the rest
of this article talks about some of the things that
they've done, and it is obnoxious, like I said, using
a bull horn, screaming obscenities and slayers and continually interrupting
their meetings, you know, sequentially, one person after the other.

(01:23:51):
And so I think both of these groups are absolutely reprehensible.
And as you point out, Lance, they're okay with allowing
abortion centers to kill babies as long as uh and
stop people from protesting that as long as you can't
protest them killing the babies that they want to kill. Well,
when it comes to empathy, they say chat GPT is

(01:24:15):
acting more human than some doctors.

Speaker 9 (01:24:19):
It's not a very high bar, that's right.

Speaker 2 (01:24:23):
They might have been to a doctor lately. Uh, you
don't usually find too much empathy that's there. But it's
kind of interesting, you know when you look at this.
The uh you know, we started searching for you know,
what we do to you know, take care of Keith's
estate and his possessions and things like that. So we're

(01:24:44):
trying to uh, you know, kind of groping in the dark.
So I said, oh, let's just ask let's just ask
GROC one of these things and see what it comes
up with. And actually it came up with some good
action items of things to do. And it began by
saying I'm so sorry for your loss, and you know,
I thought, wow, that's good. That's kind of amazing. I

(01:25:05):
expected this cold, analytical answer and it came back with that. So, yeah,
they are designed and trained for empathy, and doctors are
trained for profit. So why is as a surprise you know,
we look at this and it also brings up the
difference between empathy and sympathy. You know, when you talk

(01:25:29):
about empathy, uh, it's about emotions. I feel your pain famously,
you know from Bill Clinton that was about empathy, whereas
sympathy is I really do pity what you're doing. I
desire to help and I understand that this is it's
about an understanding. I understand what this is and I
want to help you. But again, when we talk about

(01:25:51):
empathy and we talk about chat GPT, chat GPT, can
never feel your feelings. And I think most of these
people want to talk about your lived experiences and stuff
like that which you heard from was a guy, not Mario,
but the other guy, the evil green guy, Luigi. Yeah,
Luigi Luigi Man's journey. You know he was yelling and

(01:26:17):
screaming about lived experiences and things like this. You know,
you can try to understand what it's like to walk
a mile in somebody else's shoes, but you can't actually
walk in their shoes, and so empathy at its core
is a false idea. I think, you know, we can
all be sympathetic when people are going through things, but
you're not actually going through it. You will not actually

(01:26:39):
feel what they are feeling whatever is happening, you can
try to understand it. And so I think sympathy is admirable.
You know, you can feel for somebody, but you can't
feel with somebody. You can't feel what they're feeling. And
of course chat GPT cannot feel it. It has no feelings.
And yet they're saying that because it's been trained to

(01:27:03):
be let's just say, sympathetic, and it's dealings with people,
and the doctors have not been they said AI chatbots
like chat GPT scored roughly two points higher than doctors
on a ten point empathy scale, so that's a pretty
big increase there. The advantage held across thirteen of fifteen
studies that examined cancer, mental health, thyroid conditions, and other

(01:27:26):
medical questions. And of course the chatbots will never be
able to empathize because they are not ever going to
have cancer thyroid conditions.

Speaker 4 (01:27:36):
As are sympathetic and friendly, they're doing art and creating culture.
We're going to be left in the dregs of society.
We're going to be in the gutter as the robots
get to have all the fun.

Speaker 9 (01:27:48):
That's right, But don't worry, they'll understand the pain we're
going through.

Speaker 2 (01:27:52):
Yeah, that's right, and all the money will flow to
their masters who are putting this stuff in there In
New York City. Danny says he will arrest ice agents.
The city is in danger of trespassing multiple federal laws. Now.
I believe that the mayor is because I remember when
Eric Adams got in, they had him taking the oath

(01:28:15):
on New Year's Eve night as the ball dropped. After
that dropped, they had a display there where Eric Adams
was sworn in. So I guess maybe it's on January
the first they swear in the new mayor, and that's
really when the fireworks are going to begin. Forget about
New Year's Eve, it's going to be once he gets
sworn in. Both he and Trump have been bowing up

(01:28:35):
and blustering about what they're going to do, and all
this is happening again. Like I said, the means makes
a big difference. If you're going to put out these
agents who are bullying people who are wearing masks and
shoving people around and driving their cars, and the people
who are filming what they're doing, and then pepper spraying

(01:28:57):
a baby, this is going to create the kind of
pushback that mom Danny is talking about. He says he's
going to have his New York City police arrest Immigration
and I know ICE agents. Problem is he wants to
get rid of the police. He's going to decide what
he's going to do. He's going to get rid of
the police, or is he going to use the police

(01:29:17):
to arrest the federal ICE agents. And so as he's
boasting we're going to do this, Trump is saying, well,
if he does that, and Homan is saying, if he
does that, we're going to arrest him. Trump says he'll
have mom Danny arrested if he interferes with ICE. He
promised to do that in June. It mays be seen,
but that might just happen. Mom Danny's campaign literature certainly

(01:29:41):
seems to say that he's willing to violate at least
five federal statutes. But again his messaging, he says, my
message to ICE agents and everyone across the city is
that everybody will be held to the same standard. If
you violate the law, you must be held accountable. The
problem is is that he's not doing that. He doesn't
whole people accountable who violated the immigration laws. But Trump

(01:30:06):
wants to have immigration enforcers who also don't have to
follow the law. It has become kind of optional or
you know, whoever's perspective, it is there which laws they like,
they will follow those, and you better follow and obey
the laws that they like, but then they're not bound

(01:30:26):
to those laws. We really are becoming rapidly a lawless nation.
And this is on both sides of this debate. This
is on both the side of mon Danny, who doesn't
want to have any immigration law whatsoever, and on the
side of Trump, who thinks that the enforcers of immigration
law should not be held accountable to a standard of

(01:30:48):
legal actions themselves. So mon Danny's platform is very clear
on the immigration question. The city will harbor illegals and
will block eyes from arresting and deporting them. Again that
is illegal.

Speaker 13 (01:31:02):
But the.

Speaker 2 (01:31:06):
Trump side, you know, even though they've got people who
were pepper swranging a baby, they're going to look the
other way and let them get away with that as well.
Mom Danny promised to spend one hundred and sixty five
million for illegals to get lawyers and to protect all
personal data from other jurisdictions. That means the city will
not tell the government when it has arrested an illegal alien.

(01:31:27):
During the campaign, he vowed to kick the fascist ice
out of New York City. He said the Big Apple
will be Trump proof, and so, of course Trump replies
and says, well, we'll have to arrest him. Federal law
trumps him every day, every hour, every minute. We're going
to be in New York City. Matter of fact, because
it's a sanctuary city. Trump has made it clear a

(01:31:49):
week and a half ago we're going to double down
and triple down on these sanctuary cities. That's Tom Homan.
And that's why I said, you know, if you wanted
to solve the immigration problem, first of all, you protect
the borders secondly, which Trump never did. I never did
anything with the wall, never did anything to put any
kind of obstacle there at the border during his four years.

(01:32:11):
That's one of the reasons why Steve Bannon made so
much money to frauding people telling them that he was
going to privately build the wall. And I said at
the time, I thought that one of the reasons that
he was arrested during the Trump You know why they
came after them for fraud during the Trump administration was
because the fact that he would organize a private project

(01:32:31):
to build the wall was a direct rebuke and exposure
of the lies and hypocrisy of Trump about his central
campaign issue, We're going to build the wall, and he
didn't do it, And so I thought, well, that's one
way to shut these guys down. Come after them for fraud.
But Trump eventually pardoned him after he was convicted of fraud.

(01:32:52):
But there's a lot of different things that you can
protect the border, you can stop the welfare magnet, and
you can, first of all, start by going to cities
where you're not going to have a direct confrontation, where
they're going to work with you to arrest and to
deport people peacefully. Instead, they decided that they would go
the confrontation route, and this says tells you everything about

(01:33:12):
Trump and his administration. Everything that they do is about
creating chaos conflict, and that is where they're talking about
Canada or you're talking about these sanctuary cities. That's the
first place that they want to go. And that's why
he got somebody like Homan and they're all about the conflict.
So again, they still need to obey the law while

(01:33:36):
they're enforcing the law and if they don't do that,
if they decide that they're going to disobey the law,
they're going to act as thuggishly and use whatever force
they wish. They're going to act like Judge dread Mom.
Danny is going to be made a hero because of
the optics of that approach, and they will turn him

(01:33:57):
into they'll magnify this Marxist Muslim and they'll make him
a hero. That will be the Trump effect. And I
think that's perhaps what Trump is angling for. So the
New American says, why is support for socialism growing? And
it is a real concern because if you look at

(01:34:18):
the young people again, these universities, as I said before,
seminaries for socialism, seminaries for Satanism, And when you look
at where this is all coming from, it's coming from
the universities. And Trump wants to keep those universities open.
We've got to have them, even if it means turning
over technological edge to the Chinese students, even if it

(01:34:41):
means keeping out those stupid Americans that can't be trained. Right,
as Trump said, you can't train Americans to do anything.
They're so stupid they vote for me.

Speaker 4 (01:34:54):
This goes back to the Frankfurt School, they made it
very clear that their objective was to infiltrate a damia.
They were going to merge themselves with the structures that
trained the next generation, and then they would train them
how they saw a fit. And this was you know,
many many years ago, decades upon decades. They were willing
to commit to the long, slow march through the institutions,

(01:35:18):
which if you're able to do that, it is a
remarkably effective tool. If you were able to plan in
these timescales of you know, decades to one hundred years,
you can work some very very subtle plans. You can
shape culture slowly, so slowly that most people don't even
notice it's happening.

Speaker 3 (01:35:36):
And that's what they've done.

Speaker 4 (01:35:38):
That's part of the problem is we come in, we
want to this quick, fixed solution. Oh, we're going to
take power and we're going to get it done in
four years. It's very very hard to undo something that
has been sett you know, they've laid their plans, it's
decades in the making, and you're going to undo it
in four years.

Speaker 3 (01:35:56):
That's never going to happen.

Speaker 4 (01:35:57):
You have to take a realistic view of the view
of this and say it took them decades to lay this.
It took them decades to get us where we are.
It may take decades to get us back.

Speaker 2 (01:36:10):
Yeah. As a matter of fact, it's not just the universe.
There's the universities, as you point out, the march of
the institutions, but it's it's also entertainment as well. And
you can actually see that in the in the movie
Hale Caesar by the Corn Brothers. They've got all the
writers are hardcore communists Marxists. You know, they're working every
way that they can to try to insert Communism and

(01:36:33):
Marxism into the films, which is really true. I mean,
there really was a reason why you had the red
Scare McCarthyism, because they were really doing that because of
the Franklin School. I remember when we went up to Kingston,
New York and spoke at the Occupy Peace rally for
Cheryl Clinty, and afterwards I got a chance to meet
and talk in person with Anthony Frieda that we interviewed

(01:36:56):
a week or two ago, and that's what he was
talking about because he was in a Kcademia. He goes
out in the world, did they take over all of
the institutions. So that was always the plant was very
very gradually right gradually, then suddenly we noticed and that
has been a long term plan. And that's why, you
know it is I think Maca people understand where that

(01:37:20):
problem is. They just can't see that Trump is not
with them. He's against them on this as well as
on many other issues. So what percentage of all the
people who ever lived on the earth is the average
American richer than? Well, we're richer than ninety nine point
nine percent of the people who ever lived on the earth.

(01:37:40):
We live in an age of unprecedented prosperity, yet so
many people are still dissatisfied. Again, this is the New
American pointing out this. And as they talk about it,
they talk about the root causes, which many people have
talked about. I've said it as well, that the root
cause of the socialism is envying greed. That is, you know,

(01:38:00):
something that is an innate character of our fallen nature,
and that socialism seizes on that and tries to activate that.
So more college students favor socialism sixty seven percent view
it favorably, then they do capitalism forty percent.

Speaker 3 (01:38:20):
And that's part of.

Speaker 4 (01:38:21):
Why socialism and Marxism is so hard to defeat because
it slots in so nicely into our fallen human nature.
It appeals directly to our signature. It says, they've got something,
and you deserve to take it. You deserve to be
able to just steal it from them. That's right, And
you know that's very, very hard to combat if you

(01:38:43):
do not have a Christian world, if you aren't Christian,
if you're not aware of this, if you're not willing
to combat it, if you don't have Christ in your life.
You know, that's right, that's an almost unwinnable battle. If
you're trying to argue with a Marxist who's you know,
an atheist socialist, good luck. They are fully given in.
It is feeding this desire inside them. It is appealing

(01:39:06):
to everything that is bad, and it slots in perfectly well.

Speaker 2 (01:39:12):
Love of money is the root of all evil. It's
also the root of socialism and the republican conservative quote
unquote conservative equivalent of it, which is crony capitalism. Of
the people in New York in this most recent election
by Mom Danny, those aged eighteen to twenty nine, they

(01:39:33):
said seventy two percent of men and eighty four percent
of women voted for him, So they like socialism. That's
what you're going to be living with, Travis and Lance,
with your college educated peers that are going to be there. Socialism,
as I say, has failed everywhere that has been tried.
But of course let's keep trying it yet again that's
the insanity of it. This time it'll work. And so

(01:39:58):
one person said, well, I think this is why there's
three factors. Number One, wealth has become increasingly concentrated at
the top, and we'll see that. Second, while the distribution
of wealth is highly skewed, the distribution of votes across
the electorate is not. Third, the myth that refuses to
die is that wealth can be redistributed without significantly reducing

(01:40:22):
its size. So yeah, we can just redistribute it and
not kill the goose that laid the golden egg. That
never really works, and we all can see how wealth
is being concentrated, and that is really a big part
of what is feeding this. And again that comes back
to envy, but it's also a reaction to the corporate

(01:40:47):
greed that is there. And so you know, the other
thing they mentioned, which I've talked about many, many times,
is that part of the problem is that they have
created the terms. When we talk about capitalism, that was
a term that was created by the Marxists. Why is
it that we always let them create the terms of
the debate. That means that they have the moral high

(01:41:10):
ground in terms of the debate because they create the terms.
They are progressive, but you know, the other people are
capitalists or whatever when we use those terms that they use.
And this even extends to all the red state stuff.
As I've said many times. You know shi Van Fleet
who grew up under Mao and wrote the book Mao's America,
a Survivor's Story, and she said, when I first came

(01:41:34):
to America and all these people, these conservatives are wearing
the red hats, I thought, what's going on? This is
exactly opposite of the way that it is everywhere else
in the world. Well there's a reason for that. You know,
the Marxists and the socialists are not going to fly
their own flag. They're going to pretend there's something completely different,
and so they keep coming up with these terms, and

(01:41:56):
we foolishly use those terms. So that's one of the
things that American article is saying here is that stop
using that term you know, start talking about economic freedom
because people have a and rightfully so, a knee jerk
reaction against this. It is a term that was devised

(01:42:16):
by these people to emphasize the stratification of wealth. So
how we feel about our wages and wealth is relative,
and that it depends on a comparison with the wages
and the wealth of others. As wealth becomes concentrated at
the top of those outside of this group look upon
their own economic circumstances with increasing disfavor and resentment, in

(01:42:38):
a word, envy. But I think the other aspect of this,
and we saw this when we went to China, was
that even when people are objectively poor, if their lot
in life is improving, right, they're happier. I mean, you
can see this historically in America. You know, by the
standards of today and the and the comfort of life,

(01:43:01):
were infinitely wealthier, and yet we're less dissatisfied because we
don't have the freedom and the upward mobility that these
people were building a life. They could see a future
ahead that was going to be better. And I think
that is the key thing. You know, when we look
at China, even though the people there were extremely poor,

(01:43:24):
they were, their economic situation was rapidly improving, and so
that gives you a very different perspective on this. And
so again, what can we do. We can stop using
the term capitalism. It was originated by socialists, use by
them as a pejorative to help destroy what they hated.

(01:43:47):
In other words, using the term capitalism has the precise
effect that the nineteenth century socialists had hoped for. It
alienates people. Stop using it and again, always let them
pick the terms and then try to fight them on
that moral high ground. Well, Marjorie Taylor Green also pushed

(01:44:08):
back against Trump, just like Laura Ingram did, and I
was glad to see somebody finally doing that, a politician
as well as a newscaster. And Trump started pushing back
against Marjorie Taylor Green. He says, she's lost her way.
I don't know what happened to Marjorie. She's a nice woman,
but I don't know what happened. She has lost her way,

(01:44:28):
I think. And she replied and said, I haven't lost
my way. I'm one hundred percent America first and only.
And so again she's calling him out on these betrayals
that he has done of the MAGA people. And I
hope that she can wake people up to that. Certainly,
I guess it's not going to happen with me. I'm

(01:44:50):
just going to tell people what it is and say,
if you don't see this, you're stupid, because it's been
going on now for a decade and it's about time
you figured out what's going on. There's not anything I
can tell you if you can't see it, really, but
maybe some of the people that have been on the train,
if they start to push back against this that don't
have an effect. On the November first episode of Bill

(01:45:13):
Maher's Real Time, she said that the Republicans don't have
a plan to replace Obamacare. Made her angry. So they
don't have a planned and the government shutdown. No, they
have a plan. The plan is just not to do
any of the things that they said they were going
to do. That's the real plan. It is kind of

(01:45:34):
interesting as Trump is on his vengeance tour here, they
are now finally looking at the Clinton the Clinton Foundation,
and I've talked many times during Trump's administration. First one
to Charles Ortell. He's somebody who has really focused on

(01:45:54):
the Clinton Foundation, and it was unbelievably low hanging fruit
if Trump wanted to do anything. You know, Trump didn't
have to go after Hillary Clinton for the breaking of
classified information and the leak of that with the Clinton emails.
The far bigger crime, and the one that was even

(01:46:15):
easier to go after, which was what Charles Hortel was
talking about, was the Clinton Foundation. And I say easier
because you don't even have to look at who paid
them and what the people got in terms of quid
pro quo. They had operated in violation of all the
rules of a charitable foundation. They had not filed any
the reports, they had not properly set up any the documents.

(01:46:36):
So just from an accounting perspective, just from a legal
structure of the organization, they could have been shut down
and prosecuted. And yet Trump didn't do that. And when
you look at what he's doing now going after He's
got this guy Bill Pulti, the same guy that came
up with a fifty year mortgage plan. He's got him

(01:46:56):
out there auditing people that he wants to punish, sure
get rid of, like Lisa Cook out of the Federal Reserve.
He wants to get rid of her. He wants to
punish people like Letitia James, which I think what she
did was criminal. But what he's doing is he's got
Bill Polti going in and auditing with artificial intelligence AI,
going back and looking at all of their history of

(01:47:18):
real estate transactions, trying to find some details to get
them if he would do that with the Clinton Foundation
and be over because it's right there on the surface.
Charles Hotel has talked about that over and over again.
So it looks like they are now going to start
looking at the Clinton Foundation. And the fact that they

(01:47:41):
just haven't found charges, I think tells you everything, because
it's just you don't have to do any deep dive
or any deep research. They didn't file any they haven't
complied with any of the requirements of a charit charitable foundation,
and they've played so fast and loose with all the
laws that it'd be easy to shut them down if

(01:48:01):
they wanted to do that. And then finally, before we
go to break there was an interesting thing when I
saw this. Russia claims that it thwarted British and Ukrainian
plot to steal a hypersonic missile equipped jet. Does this
sound like a movie that we've seen before. It's not
just all the dystopian science fiction films that they're recreating,

(01:48:21):
but it's actually this one as well. This goes back
to maybe you remember this nineteen eighty two and you
had a Clint Eastwood film that was called Firefox, And
do we have that in the deck here at Lance?
I didn't write that down.

Speaker 9 (01:48:38):
I didn't see anything related to Firefox.

Speaker 2 (01:48:41):
Oh okay, well I won't play the trailer then. But
the whole gist of it was that they had they
had a new jet, which back in nineteen eighty two
was like a Neurlink type of jet, right, and you
just think and it would go and it was super
fast and so forth. That was going to change the
balance of power. Well, even in I that didn't sound

(01:49:01):
too plausible. And Clint Eastwood played this crack spy and
jet pilot and they were going to task him to
go in and steal this plane. And I remember watching
the film, I thought, okay, if it flies with you know,
by reading your mind, doesn't that require some training? How

(01:49:26):
are you going to, first of all, go in and
fly this foreign jet. You don't know how the thing works,
and even worse, you've got to train it to read
your thoughts just like we were talking about on Monday,
you know that mind reading a computer thing. I mean,
they're working on that pretty hard now that part of
science fiction is becoming reality. And we showed how the
one company was bragging that they could decode the image

(01:49:50):
that you're looking at. They could decode it and reproduce
it in software just by looking at your brain activity.
Truly pretty amazing. But that was supposedly how that jet
was working. And it's going to be a game changer.
But you know, when it figures out what you're looking at,
they've got to train this computer for an hour reading

(01:50:11):
your mind. You're doing a functional MRI looking at the
brain activity as opposed to brain structure. They've got to
train it for an hour. Their competitors have to train
for forty hours, and they still can't get the stuff right.
But anyway, and in the story, of course, Clint Easwood succeeds,

(01:50:31):
but not without being chased by He disables all the
other planes that are there that like it, except one
of them doesn't get disabled. So a guy comes after
him with the same jet, so they have a dogfight
and that type of thing. But I didn't think it
was one of his best films. Interesting idea. But when
I saw this headline, I thought, this is like Firefox.

(01:50:51):
The difference is is there's a couple of spins on this.
I think make it interesting because especially when I saw
the hypersonic thing, it's like, well, this is an a
that we have fallen behind in terms of technology. So
they want to steal this hypersonic missile equipped jet. Is
it because they want to get the hypersonic missile and
reverse engineered or something. Well, this was announced by the

(01:51:15):
Russian Federal Security Service FSB. They said that they had
thwarted the alleged plot in which foreign spies allegedly offered
Russian pilots three million dollars if they would steal the jet. Right,
you get this jet, you fly it to us, and
we'll pay you three million dollars. Well, that would make sense, right,

(01:51:37):
and that would be the way that they would go
about it. And somebody who already knows how to fly
the jet because it takes a while to train on
these unusual this unusual technology that is custom made for
each one of these instruments. Here. The FSB then said
the stolen aircraft was intended to be flown toward a
NATO base and the Romanian city of Constanta. In order

(01:52:02):
to hijack the aircraft, Ukrainian military intelligence officers tried to
recruit Russian pilots offering three million dollars. The Special Services
then planned to send the jet with the hypersonic missile
to the area where NATO's largest air base is located,
where it would then be shot down by air defenses.

(01:52:22):
So rather than paying them the three million dollars, they
would shoot the jet down. And so the Russian Special
Services are saying, now we saw this and the whole
thing was going to be set up not to get
the technology, but it's going to be set up to
set up a false flag event to escalate the war
more directly with Russia. And so the interesting thing is

(01:52:47):
that they have pointed out this wouldn't have been the
first time something like this has happened. KEIV has previously
offered money and assistance to defectors. In twenty twenty three,
a Russian Mi eight pilot, Maksim Kuzmanov, defected to Ukraine,
landing as helicopter behind the front lines with the help
of the Ukrainians. Two of the other crew members, who

(01:53:09):
were unaware of his plan were killed upon landing. Kuz
Menov was assassinated a year later in Spain, where he
was living under a new identity. So this sounds very
much like the plot of a movie. So he gets
paid off, he delivers the helicopter, and then he shoots
the other two crew members, takes the money, gets a

(01:53:30):
new identity, goes to Spain, and then the Russians catch
him and kill him. In twenty twenty two, the FSB
accused former Bellingcat investigator Kristo Grozev, a Bulgarian born journalist,
taking part in a failed Ukrainian attempt to recruit Russian
military pilots. Grozev said he was embedded with Ukrainian intelligence

(01:53:50):
officers as a documentary filmmaker, and he claimed that his
text messages were forged. As for the fresh FSB claims
of the attempted and hypersonic missile theft Ukraine and the
UK will no doubt express outrage and denial, but it
does serve to illustrate the level of suspicion and shadow
wars they're currently raging in the background related to the

(01:54:13):
Ukrainian conflict. Yes, absolutely a little bit of espionage and
Hollywood movie plots, but I would not be surprised to
see some kind of a false flag attack that would
be used to escalate the war. Before we take a break, Travis,
why don't you cover the comments here?

Speaker 4 (01:54:33):
Yes, I've got one here and more. We'll be coming
in a minute. From Scott Helmer, he says, thanks guys.
My latest song calls out the war machine and false
left right divide.

Speaker 3 (01:54:42):
Our rights come from God.

Speaker 4 (01:54:43):
If it resonates, please comment and share to help wake
others up. And he linked this song in the comment,
so if you scroll up in chat you can find that.
Please go check it out, share it around. Scott does
a lot of good works. We're a talented musician.

Speaker 2 (01:54:58):
And he does the singing and he does the music himself.
You know, I saw at the top of the DRUDG
report this morning the number one country music hit is
now an AI tune. It's like we need to support
real artists, especially people who get it like Scott Helmer does.
So hope that you won't find that there.

Speaker 4 (01:55:21):
Yeah, yeah, go check it out. And we've got Jim's seven.
Thank you very much, Jim seven. We really appreciate the support.
Couldn't do it without you. All says Trump will be
a lame duck after the bid terms and can ride
that scapegoat for failed policies right out to pasture.

Speaker 2 (01:55:35):
Yeah, the gilded Gelding is what we should call them
at that point.

Speaker 4 (01:55:41):
The irs machine gun, Thank you very much, He says.
Silver is fifty two to fifty eight and climbing.

Speaker 2 (01:55:48):
That's good.

Speaker 3 (01:55:48):
Yeah, it's because the dollar, that's right, it's going down.

Speaker 2 (01:55:53):
Well, it was a little bit of a pause there,
and I said that wasn't going to last because again
there was going to be profit taking after the big
run up. And you know, there's some other things that
spooked Wall Street, and we'll talk about that when we
come back. But the fundamentals are all still there, and

(01:56:13):
the fundamentals for a bad a bad economy, and a
bad government are all still there. We're going to talk
about the AI bubble and a new pen that just
surfaced recently. Is that going to be the pen that
birthed the bubble? We'll see. We'll talk about that when
we come back. But you've got some more comments here.

Speaker 4 (01:56:32):
Pezidentovante seventeen seventy six says, where does one think the
youth will turn the system? Styme he's home ownership, marriage,
career advancement, wealth creation, etc. You don't think the displaced
youth will run to the man promising free stuff, That's.

Speaker 2 (01:56:44):
Right, you know. And I looked at asymmetric warfare. All
of the American military guys who were talking about this
at the time, and again they would have it was
really obscure stuff. I mean, they would have their conferences
and they would talk about asymmetric warfare, you know, where
we go in with the big planes and we bomb
out their infrastructure. But then you know, you've got to

(01:57:06):
put boots on the ground and get involved in nation building,
which is a failed idea. But while that happens, then
you get the improvised explosive devices and all the rest
of the stuff. A guerrilla warfare which we consistently lose.
They call that asymmetric warfare. And they said, what is
it that motivates people? Is it religion? They said no.

(01:57:26):
What we found was that the people who were the
leaders that typically evolved were typically in their early thirties.
Many of them came from very wealthy families and had
been trained as engineers or other things like that, and
what was motivating them. Initially they would initially they would
eventually turn to religion, but it was not Islam that
was initially motivating them. They were initially motivated by the

(01:57:50):
fact that they had no future, that their country had
been taken over, that all of their opportunities for advancement
had been taken from them, which is exactly what you're
talking about there, And that is what's so dangerous about
this time. That is the policy of both the Democrats
and the Republicans to leave us hopeless and without a future.

(01:58:11):
And the only answer to that is the only answer
to anything. I mean, when you look at life and
you look at how brief it is, the only answer
for hope is really in the Lord Jesus Christ. And
if people don't have that, it just they get desperate,
they get crazy, and that is really what is happening
with these with the younger generation.

Speaker 4 (01:58:35):
Syrian girls has another socialism magnet for young people is
the lack of opportunity to work and prosper Yeah, they
see they have no future and think that socialism will
give them what they need to survive.

Speaker 2 (01:58:45):
That's right, and they're wrong about part.

Speaker 4 (01:58:47):
Of the reason why a lot of you know, millennials
and younger generations have this intense animosity towards Boomers. They
see the boomers as the generation that voted for all
these policies that hollowed out America. And of course, realistically,
when you look at it, if my generation or the
Zoomer generation Generation Z had been in place of the Boomers,

(01:59:09):
they would have done the exact same thing. They would
have bought the propaganda that was there at the time,
and they would have enabled these same policies. My generation
and Zoomers are benefiting from the fact that hindsight is
twenty twenty. We can see the consequences of it. We
see and feel it, so we get to go, that
was a dumb decision. How could you have ever been
so dumb to do this?

Speaker 2 (01:59:28):
But well, the boomers, now, the boomers had no choice.
You could either vote for the bad policies or you
could not vote. And the majority of people don't vote.
And as I've said, and I said it all through
the you know, the fights about the election twenty twenty,
I said, if you want to pay attention to the
corruption and control of our elections, take a look at

(01:59:50):
ballot access, take a look at the shutdown of debates.
If you shut down debates which were completely shut down
in the selection cycle in twenty twenty four, no debates.
Democrats are Republicans. And so if you shut down debate,
if you completely control the ballot and you turn it
over to political parties who will determine who gets to

(02:00:12):
run for office, even at the lower level, then you
don't have a quote unquote democracy or a democratically elected republic.
You don't have any of that stuff. You don't have
a choice. They make sure that they put on the
ballot Tweedledee and Tweedledum, and both of them are going
to pursue the same end goal, but they will use

(02:00:34):
a few wedge issues and they will come at that
end goal from a different perspective. Well, we have a
guest who's going to join us, and so we're going
to take a quick break and we're going to talk
about all things COVID when we come back. And this
is somebody who has seen the system from the inside
and she's got some things that she wants to talk

(02:00:55):
about in terms of the medical system. And so we're
going to take a quick break and going to be
joined by Zoe Zoe Smith. I'm not sure if it's
Zoe or Zoe. I'll find out when we talked to
her her, but we'll be right back. Stay with us.

Speaker 1 (02:02:44):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 12 (02:02:49):
Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have
access to the best channels anywhere from country to blues,
classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly first playlist
for you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio dot com.

Speaker 2 (02:03:06):
Welcome back and joining us now is Zoe Smith. She
has set up a website a thrill Kill Medical cult
dot com. You can also find her on substack. The
name of the substack is Zoe. That's zwe dot substack
dot com. And we want to talk to her about

(02:03:26):
being a whistleblower and the things that she saw during
the pandemic lockdown. Zoe worked as a medical coder for
over a decade. Tell us little bit about that. What
was that involved with? Is that for insurance purposes, identifying
the procedures and putting the right code on it.

Speaker 7 (02:03:43):
Yeah, Hi, thanks for thanks for being here. Yeah, so
a medical coder, A lot of people don't even know.

Speaker 13 (02:03:49):
That it exists because you don't really see it as
a patient.

Speaker 7 (02:03:52):
But everything that happens to you in a.

Speaker 13 (02:03:55):
Hospital, clinic, X ray lab, whatever has to have a
diagnosis and procedures signed, and that's how your doctor gets paid.
So the coder is the one who reviews that documentation,
assigns the right diagnosis code, assigns the right procedure code,
and that's what gets put on the bill, and that
your insurance or medicare uses to pay your doctor or

(02:04:15):
lab or the hospital for their services.

Speaker 7 (02:04:17):
So it was really boring until would happened.

Speaker 2 (02:04:20):
Then you had a bird's eye view of what was
going on. I was just telling you off air, I said,
the AHA moment for me was the aha the American
Hospital Association and I believe it was August of twenty twenty.
I've talked about this many times. They got very upset
because they said to CMS, who was paying them. They said,
you told us that we didn't have to have a

(02:04:41):
PCR documentation for this. He said that you didn't have
enough of them, and you said they didn't work, and
you said, we just pointed somebody to a clinical diagnosis,
and you would give us a twenty percent bonus on
everything that we did to the people, as well as
the upfront cash bonus of thirteen thousand dollars and now
you want to have this this new requirement. You know
that's not fair. And so they were complaining because they

(02:05:04):
weren't getting paid and it kind of exposed the whole thing,
except nobody would cover that. It was amazing to me
how there was dead silence everywhere about that. I mean,
you incentiviize people to that degree. And I would always
say to people, look, the money is the issue.

Speaker 5 (02:05:22):
You know.

Speaker 2 (02:05:22):
The decoration of the emergency by Trump unleashed the money
and then they put out these rules through CMS and
paid these people to kill is really what was happening.
And that's what you saw as well, right, yeah.

Speaker 7 (02:05:36):
That's they did.

Speaker 13 (02:05:38):
I don't know if you're familiar with the Vaxed bus,
but Children's Health Defense they sent out a third one.
So they've done a part one, part two, and now
part three. The part three is called authorized to kill
for that reason because the CARES Act really did. It
incentivized a behavior change in hospitals and with positions and

(02:05:58):
how they were able to practice mendic It set everything
on its head and it incentiviizes everything. What you're talking about,
what the AHA said about you didn't even need a
PCR test result to get that COVID diagnosis is absolutely correct.
And that was one of the things that I noticed
in the Pandora's box of things that changed right at

(02:06:20):
when they declared two weeks to flatten the curve in
March twenty twenty, they changed all the coding roles as well,
so they April first, twenty twenty is when the COVID
nineteen diagnosis went into effect. And we were actually told
to commit fraud before that time because we didn't have
a code to reflect COVID nineteen and we needed to.

Speaker 7 (02:06:41):
Track that so much.

Speaker 13 (02:06:43):
And of course everyone had to get the PCR test
in order to get the diagnosis. But then there was
this official coding guideline, which is what we use as coders.

Speaker 7 (02:06:52):
It's like our bible.

Speaker 13 (02:06:54):
It tells us what's correct, what's fraud, and it's essentially
it lays.

Speaker 7 (02:06:59):
Out the rules.

Speaker 13 (02:07:00):
And in those rules, there's a part that says, in
order to be diagnosed with COVID nineteen, all your position
needs to do is write down in their medical opinion
that they think that you have COVID nineteen. They didn't
need to do an exam, they didn't need to have
a PCR test. Result, and it says right in that
official guideline, this is an exception to section two H

(02:07:22):
in patient Coding Guidelines, which says for every other diagnosis,
they have to do an exam and they have to
have some sort of clinical documentation, usually some sort of
lab work or diagnostics to prove their working diagnosis.

Speaker 7 (02:07:38):
So COVID was an exception for.

Speaker 13 (02:07:40):
That, and that was one of the really big red
flags that came up for me. And of course I
noticed in my position, not only is everyone getting this
PCR test, will we come in they're not all sick,
but then they get this COVID nineteen diagnosis. And the
part that most people that still a lot of people
aren'tamiliar with is when they did the two weeks to

(02:08:02):
flatten the curve and they locked down everybody. They actually
kicked people out of the ICU early, and they shut
down other wings of the hospital. They went down to
a skeleton crew, so they consolidated wings within the hospital,
so the ER and the ICUs stayed open, but the
rest of the hospital was shut down. We were getting

(02:08:24):
furloughed and laid off and hiring freezes and no raises,
no bonuses. During the time when the media was saying,
these healthcare heroes are showing up to fight the onslaught
of COVID nineteen patients. What was an onslaught of false
positive tests? But it wasn't an onslaught of a whole
bunch of patients. We were getting furloughed. So the hospital

(02:08:45):
really really needed that money because they were bankrupted right
before those incentives came out, so they really needed those incentives.
So they were absolutely excited to label someone as COVID
nineteen and get that twenty percent diagnosis, and then hook
them up to the ventilator, which they got another bonus for,
and then the rend does appear, which they were giving

(02:09:07):
out like candy during this entire time. The bonus really
didn't go into effect until August of twenty twenty, but
they were using it from about April all the way through.
And I noticed how the protocols were killing people, and
doctors would just say, oh, this is a progression of
COVID nineteen. And to this day, a lot of people
will say, oh, I had a family member that died

(02:09:29):
of COVID. They went to the hospital because they had
COVID and they died of COVID.

Speaker 7 (02:09:34):
But I asked them.

Speaker 13 (02:09:35):
Did they really die of COVID or did they die
of the protocol? Were they not that sick until they
got there? And then they circled the drain because in
my experience, most of the patients within sometimes a few
days to sometimes it took up to a month. But
those protocols were killing people, shutting down their organs, and

(02:09:56):
then they would die. And that wasn't normal to have.

Speaker 7 (02:10:00):
That happened to an ammonia patient.

Speaker 13 (02:10:02):
Normally they'd be there three days, we pump them full
of antibiotics which we weren't using for COVID nineteen, and
then they would go home.

Speaker 7 (02:10:10):
So this was totally backwards.

Speaker 13 (02:10:12):
And then I started to notice all the incentives because
even as a coder, they have all these checks and
balances in the electronic medical record system and it counts
against you if you miss something, so like if I
missed someone for COVID nineteen, I would get a notice
about it like, oh, this is going to count against
your score and might not get a raised this year
because you weren't a good coder. And they were watching

(02:10:34):
that for Randesevir because the bonuses were so much on
the bill. Every single Randezevier infusion was four thousand dollars,
give or take a little bit throughout the country because
it's weighted based on where you live, so be more
expensive in New York or California.

Speaker 7 (02:10:53):
But around four thousand dollars per dose is how much
they were getting.

Speaker 2 (02:10:58):
Yeah, the minilators. I interviewed to a woman who was
a nurse. She wrote a book called Pandemic Nurse, and
she was in Florida and she said, I wasn't seeing,
you know, the kind of narrative that they were talking
about with the pandemic, and everybody was saying it was
all happening up in New York. So she left and
went to New York to help and set around for
a couple of days after she told them she was
there before they brought her in. When they finally did
bring her in, she's like, you know, what's going on.

(02:11:20):
They're not busy either. When they brought her in, physician
walked around, showed to the people on the ventilators and said,
you know, about ninety percent of these people are going
to die. And she said it was horrible. They were
just killing people. And of course, when you look at it,
if you get a thirteen percent, if you get a
thirteen thousand dollars bonus for pointing at somebody and saying
they got COVID. They may not even be sick, as
you pointed out. Then if you put them on a ventilator,

(02:11:41):
you get thirty nine thousand dollars already right there. You
got fifty two thousand dollars for a machine that costs
you fifty thousand dollars, and then they will pay you
twenty percent on the charges that you've got for them
to use it until you kill them with that ventilator.
And again, pullmonologists were looking at this and come back
and said, this never made any sense. We never did it,

(02:12:02):
like as you're pointing out, they get people antibiotics and
things like that, so we would never put people on
a ventilator, you know, for pneumonia or things like that,
exactly well of it was so incredibly corrupt and counterintuitive,
and they turned the hospitals into killing machines for money,
and everybody's willing to do that. I mean, if you
got somebody this there, and even if it wasn't an

(02:12:25):
economic emergency that had been created partially by the government,
you know, if you were to tell somebody you point
to that person and say they've got this condition, I'll
give you thirteen thousand dollars. We know how human nature works,
and we know how the corporate hospitals work. I mean,
the incentives to do that are going to be huge,
just like the disincentives to report somebody when they've had

(02:12:48):
a reaction to the vaccines are going to be huge
as well. Were you still there when they started the
vaccination program or had you left because you say that
you left when they made the vaccine mandatory before that, I.

Speaker 13 (02:13:03):
Started to wake up during really when they started declaring
two weeks to platten the curb and I started seeing
people wearing masks in public. I knew this was not
this was not a pandemic and there was something some
kind of psychological operation going on. Because I had worked
in the hospital for the swine flu scare and it
wasn't a thing.

Speaker 7 (02:13:21):
In the hospital like it was just regular flu.

Speaker 13 (02:13:23):
I didn't even talked to people that were on the
front lines, like er doctors and nurses, and they said
some of them even said that they got it and
it wasn't.

Speaker 7 (02:13:31):
That big of a deal.

Speaker 13 (02:13:32):
So when they declared COVID, I was really suspicious. This
is just going to be another vaccination campaign, because they
already had mandates for the flu shot for healthcare workers
for like a decade before that, and I had been
doing the exemption every year.

Speaker 7 (02:13:47):
And the reason I did that.

Speaker 13 (02:13:48):
Is because the first year that they made healthcare workers
get the flu shot, everybody was getting the flu. Yeah,
And so that was the year that we came up
with the It was just a rumor within the university
lab where I worked, but everybody was saying it that
you get the flu from the flu shot. So ever
since then, I just didn't want to do it. So
during that whole year of operation, work speed and the

(02:14:08):
only thing that's going to get us back to normal
is this vaccine. I thought this, if the flu shot
never worked, the chances that the covid shot is.

Speaker 7 (02:14:16):
Going to work is slim to nil.

Speaker 13 (02:14:19):
And the amount of pressure for this one compared to
the flu shot is astronomical, So there's something to it.
So that made me actually not just look at the
covid shot, but look at all the other vaccines. And
what I learned was they don't teach coders or doctors
or nurses anything about vaccine side effects or adverse effects.

(02:14:40):
Despite the fact that they have codes to assign for
vaccine effects. But I would see patients come in with
like eon.

Speaker 7 (02:14:48):
Beret before this, and the doctors would try.

Speaker 13 (02:14:51):
Very hard not to relate it to a vaccine, and
there would be codes in there like adverse effect of
flu shot or adverse effect whatever, and those are supposed
to be like a safety signal code. Like one of
the reasons why the ICD ten system, which is owned
by the WHO, by the way, so every member state
that is part of the WHO has to report these codes,

(02:15:13):
and it's for statistical monitoring purposes. So this is how
they monitor pandemics. This is how they monitor cancer, like
how many cases of cancer there are throughout the world,
or heart problems or pneumonia cases. This is the system
that they use, and it's also supposed to be used
starting in clinical trials for devices and drugs to look

(02:15:36):
for a safety signal. So I thought, with this COVID
nineteen vaccine, there should be a code for adverse effect
of this shot, and it should be my job to
assign it. So I did my due diligence and I
looked into all the warnings and what could happen if
people got the shot, and then I looked at.

Speaker 7 (02:15:54):
What could happen if people got the.

Speaker 13 (02:15:56):
Other vaccines, and I started to realize that they have
been varying all all of the effects that people would
get from vaccines and not assigning these adverse effect codes
up until twenty twenty. And then when the COVID nineteen
vaccine came out, there was no code to report it.

Speaker 7 (02:16:11):
So it should have been my job to collect that
danger signal.

Speaker 13 (02:16:15):
And I even went on a podcast called Deborah Get's
Red Pill. It was just a radio show in early
twenty twenty one, right after I quit my job, and
I said, the COVID nineteen vaccine is more dangerous than
all of the other vaccines combined. And that was with
my that was just an observation, but it was ten
years of medical coding experience and then learning what I

(02:16:39):
learned about vaccine side effects and all the cases that
I saw of children in the er constantly having XMR
rashes or even anaphylactic responses, and then I look at
the record. They just got a vaccine, but the doctor's
not connecting the two. So when COVID nineteen came out,
people were having strokes and sephalitis and blood cloths like

(02:17:00):
never seen before my.

Speaker 7 (02:17:01):
Own card idis.

Speaker 13 (02:17:02):
They were getting COVID nineteen immediately after getting the shot,
like the same day or the next day, and then
being hospitalized.

Speaker 7 (02:17:08):
There were people with paralytic.

Speaker 13 (02:17:10):
Problems, seizure disorders, blood disorders where they couldn't even figure
out what was going on because the patient was plotting
and bleeding at the same time and they didn't even
know how to treat it.

Speaker 7 (02:17:22):
Crazy stuff started happening just in the first four.

Speaker 13 (02:17:25):
Months of the vaccine rolled out, so it wasn't even
available to the rest of the public yet. But by
summer in twenty twenty one is when they started saying
you at home, like this is the hospital leadership. They
would have videos that they would send to all staff
all the time monitoring COVID, and they were really really
pushing us to get that shot. They were saying, we're

(02:17:46):
not doing as good as the other hospitals who are
getting incentivized for meeting their vaccination quota, and we weren't.
So they were pointing to us, people who worked from home,
who never saw patients, who.

Speaker 7 (02:17:57):
Never walked into a hospital.

Speaker 13 (02:17:59):
You guys spreading it around society, and we're going to
have to fire you if you don't get your shots.
So at that point I couldn't take it anymore. I
knew that my job had been to get them money
for murdering patients, and I was having a crisis of
conscience over that. And then before the vaccine went out,
I decided I was going to be a spy at

(02:18:21):
that point and just see if the vaccine really was
as bad as old warnings said. And then it turned
out to be far worse than I anticipated, and I
didn't think that the chances would be very good that
I would get an exemption. Because they changed the rules
for getting an exemption, a lot of people got fired,

(02:18:42):
and I didn't want to work for them anymore. I
didn't want to continue helping them get money to murder people.

Speaker 2 (02:18:48):
Good for you, Good for you, Yeah, you really don't
have You really did have a bird's eye view of
this whole thing, because you're seeing the diagnostic codes as
well as the treatments that are there there, and so
you could get a good picture of what was actually
coming on and seeing the trends that were there. That's

(02:19:09):
very interesting your perspective. You know, I've got something, And
I apologize because we can't feed this to you, so
you can't hear this. I'll kind of talk about it
and describe it, but I want the audience to hear
what Lutnick. I call him lucky Lucky Lutnick. What he
said in terms about the money that can be made
off of this kind of stuff. And he uses an
example of the vaccines.

Speaker 14 (02:19:32):
The United States government, the most powerful, the greatest customer
buy stuff. We walk in. We're going to buy is
the example I like to use. We're going to buy
two billion COVID vaccines. When we buy it, Faiza and
Maderna stocks are going to triple, going to triple. Then

(02:19:52):
we say everyone's going to have this vaccine. If I
were after Jared Kushner negotiated the best daily could, Howard
Lettnik walked in the room, Howard Letnig would say, what
do you think twenty percent warrants?

Speaker 2 (02:20:07):
Twenty percent warrants right right?

Speaker 13 (02:20:09):
What?

Speaker 14 (02:20:09):
So we'd make fifty billion dollars off of who nobody?

Speaker 2 (02:20:13):
We didn't take from anybody to do it.

Speaker 14 (02:20:15):
Okay, the shareholders a Pfizer.

Speaker 2 (02:20:17):
Who we've just trimpled them with our order.

Speaker 11 (02:20:20):
Now, how many of my customers?

Speaker 2 (02:20:24):
Yeah, Zoe, what he's saying. Zoe says, yeah, you get
the US government's the most powerful customers. So we're going
to go in and we're going to buy two billion
dollars worth of these vaccines from Fizer mood dinner. We're
going to force people to take them. He goes, So
I'm looking at this. I'm saying, well, I'm going to
get some twenty percent warrants. I want some action of that.
I know what's going to happen with all this, And
he says, and you know, and who have we harmed

(02:20:45):
with all this stuff. It's like the people who got
the shot, obviously, but he doesn't even see that. He
sees nothing but dollar signs. This is the guy, of course,
that is now the Commerce secretary for Trump, and he's
the guy who's pushing through the stable coins and all
the rest of this stuff. Makes you wonder what he
is going to be doing to this with the stable

(02:21:06):
coins and the resetting of the financial system. This is
these are people who see nothing other than money, and
they don't care what they have to do to other
people in order to make money. It truly is amazing,
the greed and the system and the corruption.

Speaker 13 (02:21:21):
Right it is so hard for me to wrap my
brain around how many people they killed.

Speaker 7 (02:21:28):
It was a science silent genocide that is still invisible.

Speaker 13 (02:21:32):
But there's no family that I've talked to in the
last five years that hasn't been touched by it in
some way. Either someone they know is suffering from cancer
or some horrible chronic condition after getting the shop, or
they've lost somebody like I.

Speaker 7 (02:21:48):
Lost my cousin who was seventeen, who suddenly.

Speaker 13 (02:21:51):
Just drove into a tree and they didn't do an
autopsy or look into it. And there's countless other people
out there like that. I mean, this was our family,
and people are still just kind of burying their heads
in the sand and wanting even to.

Speaker 7 (02:22:07):
Go on like it didn't happen.

Speaker 13 (02:22:08):
The amazing system is still set up to where it
could still happen again, Like we haven't even held those
people accountable.

Speaker 2 (02:22:16):
As a matter of fact, we put them back in
office again. And so you know, that's why to me,
I look at it, and what astounds me the most
is just how effective the control of information has been.
That's why what you're doing is so important. You've got
to get out there and tell people what happened, because
as you point out allmost everybody I know as well,

(02:22:38):
there's been somebody in their family, immediate or extended family
that's been harmed by this. But everybody thinks this is
a one off. It didn't happen to everybody else. They
don't realize that it happened, how broad this is and
how extensive it is, and I think that they're alone,
just like they wanted us to think that we were
lone if we saw what was happening and we weren't
going to participate in it. Well, you're the only one

(02:22:59):
who thinks like that, and we're not. You know, there's
a lot of people out there who saw what was happening,
and we're onto this scam from the very beginning. And
I had the help of a person who gave me
a heads up about a year before this happened. He said,
there's a lot of chatter about Dark Winter two and
he goes, you know what Dark Winter one was, And
he's like, yeah, I know about that. And so when

(02:23:21):
I saw this, it was falling right in the pattern
of all these germ games. The very first one was
two months before nine to eleven, so I knew exactly
what was happening with this and also knew about the
PCR test and what Carrie Mollis had said, talk a
little bit about what you saw with a PCR right.

Speaker 13 (02:23:37):
So that was another part of the Pandora's box that
changed right at the beginning of March twenty twenty when
they declared two weeks to flatten the curve and changed
our whole lives upside down.

Speaker 7 (02:23:48):
I noticed that before.

Speaker 13 (02:23:51):
COVID I worked in the University Love when I was
in college, and we had what's called a rapid flu test,
and it was something that was no swap too, or
it could be a saliva swab, but it wasn't something
that went all the way up to your brain like
the COVID PCR swap did, and even the instructions like
us in the lab as lab assistants, the one of

(02:24:13):
the number one things we did was coach people on
how to collect specimens properly, because it was our job
to screen them, make sure they were gonna work for
the test, and if they weren't in a correct format
to accept for the test, then we'd have to tell
the nurser doctor we needed to go recollect that specimen.

Speaker 7 (02:24:31):
So these rapid flu tests they had to be done within.

Speaker 13 (02:24:33):
Fifteen minutes, and it was basically a PCR test, it
didn't have the same cycle thredsial part so it's kind
of a predecessor to the COVID nineteen PCR test. But
it wasn't done on every patient that had a cold
or flu symptom or a pneumonia at all. It was
only done on patients that came in with a recurrent

(02:24:54):
pneumonia that they couldn't cure or a recurrent cold, and
it would be done try and figure out which types
of medications this particular disease would respond to. So it
was like a case by case basis. It wasn't just
everybody that walked into the hospital. And so when COVID
nineteen came around and they said you need to stick
this all the way up into people's brains, no saliva,

(02:25:17):
and it has to be on every single person, because
I mean, it really flipped it.

Speaker 7 (02:25:23):
At one point.

Speaker 13 (02:25:24):
It went from you can't get the PCR tests like
because they had a drive through where you could go
out into society at first, and you have to go
to one of these PCR testing centers and they'd say
you have to have symptoms you can't get it unless
you have symptoms. And then people were mad that they
couldn't get the PCR tests, and then like overnight, it
flipped to now everybody has to get it for everything.

(02:25:44):
You have to get it if you walk in the er,
even if you don't have COVID symptoms. And I thought
that was weird. We never did that before. That is
not supposed to be a screening test. It's supposed to
be a diagnostic test, because the screen is done when
you don't have symptoms, trying to rule out if you're
developing something. And they were telling us asymptomatic spread. Well,

(02:26:06):
I could see in the hospital there's no such thing
as asymptomatic spread. This six feet thing is made up.
Masks don't work.

Speaker 7 (02:26:13):
I knew that from the very beginning because.

Speaker 13 (02:26:16):
Masks in the hospital had only been used for like
collecting spittle over like a surgery case. It wasn't meant
to prevent germ spread. That was never part of our
infection control. So I knew there was something up with
these PCR tests, and I kept looking at the results
and finally I find that it's done by a PCR,

(02:26:36):
and I recall my time at a University lab when
we were just starting PCR testing, because this was early
two thousands and Mullas invented it, like late eighty six
is when the NIH took it up and started using PCR,
So it got into healthcare early two thousands, and all
the texts like my mom was a medical technologist. It
was her job, which she actually ran one of these labs.

(02:26:57):
It was her job to run those tests. And they
were all talking like this was like their new tech,
like they were a kid in candy store, excited about it,
this PCR thing.

Speaker 7 (02:27:08):
But it was all genetic testing. It was genetic.

Speaker 13 (02:27:10):
It was done for cancer screening, which they thought was genetic,
and it was done for like women that would like
they would call it genetic counseling. If you were a
couple and you're a female, and you go and you
want to have genetic counseling. You can see if you
have like a hereditary disease like Huntington's and then maybe
decide if you want to continue with procreation or not.

Speaker 7 (02:27:35):
So it was genetic. So I thought, why all of
a sudden are we testing for viruses with PCR.

Speaker 13 (02:27:41):
Well, while I wasn't looking, because for ten years I
was a medical coder, so I wasn't really looking at
what was going on in the lab until COVID happened.
So then I find it's by PCR, and I start
looking at, well, there's obviously this problem with false positives.
Even Elon Musk was saying, I got two tests in
one day, one was negative, one and was positive. And

(02:28:01):
I could see the hospital was running over and over
and over these PCR tests, waiting to get a positive
result if they didn't get the right result, and I'm like,
this doesn't make any sense.

Speaker 7 (02:28:11):
What is going on here? And fast forward to like
after the PCR test evolved.

Speaker 13 (02:28:18):
A little bit toward the end of twenty twenty into
twenty twenty one, they had what's called a PCR multiplex assay,
so it was four.

Speaker 7 (02:28:27):
Different viruses they were actually monitoring.

Speaker 13 (02:28:30):
Flu, A, flu B, RSV, and COVID nineteen And the
only one that ever came up positive out of a
whole year of running all four of these viruses was COVID,
not one flu, not one RSV. And they say, we
have an RSB pandemic.

Speaker 2 (02:28:50):
Now that's such an amazing thing. And you know, we
go back and we used to play the clips all
the time of Malis calling out Fauci because you know,
Facci used the the PCR test claim that AIDS was
caused by a virus, and that created a big back
and forth between them, and Mala said, well, I'm not

(02:29:10):
going to get involved in that fight, but I'll tell
you this that you can't prove it using the PCR test.
They can't be used as a diagnostics like that. And
so it was very interesting because they also did not
isolate the HIV, you know, the the virus that supposedly
caused AIDS, either, and so this whole thing has been
kind of a bluff. What it reminds me of, Zoe

(02:29:32):
is the polygraph tests. My wife used to be a
district personnel manager for convenience stores, and what they would
do if they would have massive shortages somewhere and they
thought there was theft that was going on with the employees,
they would call them in and polygraph them. And the
polygraph did not work, but it only worked if people
believed that it could tell them tell whether or not

(02:29:55):
they were lying, and then they would tell the truth
about it and make a confession. Right. So it was
simply a mind that was being played on the people
that were there, and that's exactly. Yeah, that's what the
PCR thing is. It really is a mind game, except
that it's become something of a lie detector for the
people who are administering it. We realize now that they
are the liars who are putting this stuff out. I
just had in a comment Lance put up my producer.

(02:30:17):
He said that video of Lutnik where he's talking about
that reminds him of this scene out of the Big Short,
which we just went back and watched again because of
the AI bubble, And at one point this guy gets
up and he's talking and one of the guys who's
onto the whole scam says, why is he confessing, And
the other guy says, he's not confessing, he's bragging what

(02:30:40):
Lutnik was doing. He wasn't confessing about all this stuff.
He was bragging about it. And how he continues to
get away with this kind of stuff truly is amazing. Yeah.

Speaker 13 (02:30:48):
Yeah, Well, what's even more nefarious about the PCR test
is so the false positive narrative that is only it's
about the cycle threshold. But you're correct, they didn't actually sequence.
They didn't sequence stars COVID too, so they never had
a sequence. They have what's called a consensus sequence, which

(02:31:08):
is an average that an AI came up with, and
that's what they used because they knew they would find
this in a percentage of people, and then they could
dial it in with the cycle threshold up or down.

Speaker 7 (02:31:19):
Same thing with the AIDS thing.

Speaker 13 (02:31:21):
They never isolated AIDS and they used their antibody tests
at first, which could be dialed up or down in
the same way as the cycle threshold. And David Rasnik, PhD,
who I've interviewed, can vouch for that. He's got all
the science on his web page to prove all of that.
But what I was looking past the cycle threshold because
I knew this test is dialed in for some reason,

(02:31:44):
like they can predict the results somehow, and I needed
to know how they were manipulating the test, And so
I looked a little bit further and I find a
document from the CDC that says for every COVID test,
every CLIA certified lab, which is all of them, they
all have to be in order to build insurance or anything,
have to be CLIA certified. Then they have to send

(02:32:07):
a genetic sequence to one of two gene banks, either
NCBI or GISAI d gene banks, and it listed like
eight different sequences. So they're saying, you know, the variants
in the details. But if you look at some of
these labs that were running PCR tests and making all

(02:32:31):
the money off running these PCR tests, they could also
take that same sample off that machine, put it on
another machine, run a sequence. And they needed to in
order to comply with the CDC's directive to send genetic sequences.

Speaker 7 (02:32:46):
To these gene banks.

Speaker 13 (02:32:48):
And I interviewed David Rasnik, who is a chemistry professor
who worked with Kerry Molis and new Kerriy Mollis. I
asked them directly, do you think that they were just
clipping a tiny little section of the genetic code and
then sending it to these gene banks or do you
think they were getting the entire sequence?

Speaker 7 (02:33:06):
And he says, well, they're running.

Speaker 13 (02:33:07):
A lab, they're busy, they're not really thinking about, you know,
taking the time to clit out a sequence.

Speaker 7 (02:33:14):
So could they yes, but would they really do that?

Speaker 13 (02:33:17):
No, It'd be so much easier for them to just
send the whole thing and then let the gene bank
decide which part that they want to determine is the
variant of concern. So they were, And you look at
the different gene banks. There's one called Data Van which
is now a public private partnership. You look at the
Human Genome Project, which is now BGI Bgien Genetics I

(02:33:43):
think in China, which is their biggest biotech company, And
there's billions of billions of dollars in collecting our DNA,
and what they say they're using it for is to
And now we have Larry Ellison actually admitting it day
two of the Trump administration that they're going to use AI,
which is what they use to get the consensus sequence
that they dial the PCR test in with. They're going

(02:34:06):
to use AI to look at our blood and then
make a drug or a therapeutic or a vaccine tailored
to our individual genome. And now there's a massive industry
of all these big tech oligarchs that are using AI
to develop different vaccines or different therapeutics, biotech therapeutics tailored

(02:34:28):
to the individual genome. So whether or not they're successful
with this technology, there's a whole.

Speaker 7 (02:34:32):
Bunch of money invested in it.

Speaker 13 (02:34:34):
So I think PCR was actually a data mining operation
as well as a money laundering operation.

Speaker 2 (02:34:41):
That's interesting. Yeah, And of course if they want to
make a bioweapon that is going to target certain groups
of people, that makes it very easy to do that
as well. You know. And when you look at the
PCR Handy who also has a substack and he's been
a regular listener comment or on the program, he worked
in hospitals and he said, and he was suspicious of

(02:35:02):
these things. Finally got a nurse to take one of
these swabs right out of the package and run it
through and got a positive test without swamping anybody. So
some of these Yeah, it was such garbage. I mean,
either it's preloaded with something or the PCR test is
just so off the charts with its magnification whatever. We

(02:35:22):
can find anything anywhere.

Speaker 7 (02:35:23):
Kerry mallis so didn't be the president of Tanzania.

Speaker 13 (02:35:26):
I think he did some like a papaya and like
a Coca cola.

Speaker 2 (02:35:32):
That's right, it's total nonsense in garbage. And I remember
when they had the con Film Festival. It was in
the summer of twenty twenty, and he had all these
elitists who somehow they got there I guess on their
private jets and didn't have to get screened too much.
But anyway, they're there and they were complaining that they
had to do spit tests. They said, that's disgusting. We
got to spit in this thing and they got to

(02:35:53):
test it and so forth. I said, yeah, so why
don't they allow us to do a spit test? Right,
they got to ram that thing up your nose. But
you don't get that. But the elites, the jet setters,
the private jets, they get the spit test or whatever.
Oh my godness, all this stuff.

Speaker 13 (02:36:10):
In the university lab, there was something called sputum testing,
which is exactly that you basically at hakalugi into a
cup and like it was the most disgusting sample I
ever had to deal with when I worked in the lab,
And I make a joke in my book, we all
were spared that they that they didn't make that the
test that we had to do.

Speaker 7 (02:36:33):
But I'm telling me, that's what the elites do.

Speaker 2 (02:36:35):
Yeah, I think that's preferable, to have that thing ram
rotted up your nose. I guess I didn't have that
done to me, so I I went to the whole
thing without having a PCRs. Sorry, go ahead me neither.

Speaker 13 (02:36:46):
That was another reason why I walked out because if
I were to stay in the hospital, they are stay
working for them and get the exemption that I was
going to have to take a PCR test every week,
and I didn't want to have to take it PCR test.

Speaker 7 (02:37:00):
I was pretty sure they were going to be collecting.

Speaker 13 (02:37:02):
Our DNA with it, or sensing if we're vaccinated or not,
or somehow tying that in with the vaccine passport. It
wasn't entirely sure how it's going to work, but I
knew that it wasn't what they were telling us, and
I wasn't about to play long.

Speaker 7 (02:37:17):
Yeah, So that was another reason why I couldn't.

Speaker 2 (02:37:19):
And of course some are the other things too, where
some people did some you know, zoomed down a microscope
looking at the tip of the swab and said, look
at this. You know, here's one of the cotton swab
and here's this PCR thing. It's got all these spikes
on it. And if I run it across, some of
these things of spikes stick and stay. So are they
actually implanting something into you? You know?

Speaker 7 (02:37:38):
There's some research on it.

Speaker 13 (02:37:41):
And I found there were two chemicals on the tip
of the swab. One of them was ethylene oxide, and
that alone can like they were putting it, you know,
way up in your nose where your pinty old land
is your third eye, which is right at the top.
So putting that chemical right there is known to cause cancer, right,
and so the more you do it, the more perconogenic

(02:38:01):
it's going to be.

Speaker 7 (02:38:02):
And then it also has a chemical property where it
will basically block.

Speaker 13 (02:38:06):
And calcify your pineal gland, so it like closes your
third eye. And it's also a way that your brain
can sense light. It's how your your body basically like
synchronizes hormones throughout your whole body. So it can like
turn change your whole endocurrent system if you set off
your if you close or calcify your your pineal plan

(02:38:28):
so all sorts of things could happen just with that
one chemical. But I think there was also graphene oxide
on there. There was different schools that said they have
been given these special masks even that had graphine in
them similar like the exact same phenomenon about the fibers
that actually move and respond to magnetics. Graphine oxide has

(02:38:50):
a magnetic property to it. That's why they wanted to
use it. But it's also supposed to be a clean
so they were saying, like, we're using this to make
it anti bacterial, because it has anti bacterial properties. But
both the swabs and some of the masks had graphene

(02:39:11):
fibers in them that could maybe do that.

Speaker 2 (02:39:15):
And so if they can't inject their idea what.

Speaker 7 (02:39:17):
That would do if you shove it off your nose
over and over and over.

Speaker 2 (02:39:21):
So they can't inject the graphene into you, they can
get it in there another way. And of course I
mentioned this many times too. There's a couple of different batches,
each of them over a million of these shots in Japan,
and they noticed that they were getting black particulates. I
don't know if it happened because they didn't keep them
at the super cold temperatures or whatever, but they noticed

(02:39:41):
black participants in they particulates, and they said they reacted
with magnets. Yeah, so what is that? But they would
end the story no more talking about that, and the
Japanese government threw away a couple of million of these
vaccines because of that type of thing. But yeah, there's
just so many issues there and people have been lied

(02:40:03):
to so thoroughly about all the stuff. This is why
it's not a dead issue. It is still alive and
they're going to try to do all this stuff again,
and since it worked so well, they will use the
same tactics again. That's why it's very important to talk
about these different tactics. And that's amazing.

Speaker 13 (02:40:20):
Yes, right, they're moving forward with the mRNA. I mean
they're not only putting it in our food like we've
probably heard.

Speaker 7 (02:40:28):
I'm sure your audience has heard.

Speaker 13 (02:40:30):
About the bird flu and how they're doing the self
amplifying bird flu injections for poultry and they're trying to
get it in cattle, and they've had mRNA shots in pork,
so almost all all the pork is tainted now since
like twenty eighteen. Now they're rolling it out for pets.
So now when you go in, you try it, and
you have to get your annual RABY shot for your pets.

(02:40:51):
Now that's going to be mRNA. They're moving over to
the m RNA platform for all the vaccines. Yes, so
nor means that who might be a little like cautious
about COVID.

Speaker 7 (02:41:03):
Nineteen because they've heard the rumors by now, most of them, but.

Speaker 13 (02:41:06):
They haven't heard that now your RSV, your FLU, and
a lot of even like the childhood vaccines are moving
over to this mRNA platform where they get to bypass
clinical trials. So it still hasn't been This is an
experiment that is now being rolled out to all our
vaccines under the guise of this is totally fine, this

(02:41:28):
is normal science. We've totally tested this, but it's absolutely not.

Speaker 7 (02:41:34):
I mean they've.

Speaker 2 (02:41:35):
Had that's right.

Speaker 7 (02:41:36):
People have understood for like three years. Yeah, for the
first one, we just barely passed the first part of monitory.

Speaker 2 (02:41:44):
That's right, And people need to understand that the guy
who boasted about being the father of the vaccine. First
things he did is you pointed out Stargate thing with
Larry Elison where he's talking about, well, we're going to
use AI to design custom design this for your genetics,
and then we will deliver it with an MRI plan.
And the person that they put in as they chose
to put in at the head of the CDC was

(02:42:06):
Susan Monirez, and that had been what she was working
on with BARDA and with ARPA H and these dark
bioweapon companies that are part of the of the government
and the military industrial conflicts and the bioweapon platforms and
things like that. That's what. So there's all these different

(02:42:28):
threads that tie this throughout the Trump administration pushing m
RNA for all these various things. And of course then
Brooke Rawlins, who's the Agricultural Secretary, she decides on her
own initiative that she's going to end this mass culling
of chickens by authorizing the mRNA bird flu for chickens,

(02:42:50):
and then they authorize it for other livestock as well.
It is the signals are all there that this is
all still going on, that Trump is right at the
epicenter of all this mRNA stuff. And I guess what
we can call now the MRNAI as an AI artificial intelligence.
It's all connected together, isn't it.

Speaker 13 (02:43:10):
Absolutely It's a giant web, and it is going to
be tied to our behavior scores and if we comply,
how much we comply with it?

Speaker 7 (02:43:22):
Looking at you know, who is monitoring.

Speaker 13 (02:43:24):
The DNA where they have to report the PCR results,
to who's hiding the adverse effects of the vaccine. Putting
that all together and looking at where are they actually
where are we reporting all of these PCR results and

(02:43:45):
where are we reporting the COVID nineteen case numbers, And
now we actually have a code to report the COVID
nineteen adverse effects, but it's still not being used.

Speaker 7 (02:43:58):
So looking at that and trying to.

Speaker 13 (02:44:01):
Figure out where the code was and why we're not
able to report it still, I happen to find that
every agency involved in monitoring COVID nineteen cases and vaccination
tracking specifically because there's so many vaccine registries.

Speaker 7 (02:44:17):
That blows your mind. It's tied to national security.

Speaker 13 (02:44:20):
Oh yeah, so it's a matter of national security if
you participate in this scheme.

Speaker 2 (02:44:28):
Yeah, this is all DARPA, and it's all the military
and the intelligence agencies and all of the Dark Winter
stuff they had, you know, Faucci and the former head
of the CIA was playing the role of the president
during the first germ game of Dark Winter. I mean,
it's all the usual suspects that are involved in all
this stuff. It really is a bioweapon that is really

(02:44:49):
targeted to the population, and it truly is amazing.

Speaker 13 (02:44:53):
I think they're even going to try and do more
data mining that go even further than PCR testing with
the wearables rollout that we're getting now because the information
like when I learned that our COVID nineteen case numbers,
the PCR test is actually getting reported to foreign countries,

(02:45:16):
and our DNA is being data mined, and they're able
to tell if we've had a vaccine or not, what's
our ethnicity, where we are, how much money we make?
Like they're layering all of this information. And during Operation
work Speed, they had a program called Tiberius, which was
used in hospitals.

Speaker 7 (02:45:35):
There's different palanteer.

Speaker 13 (02:45:36):
Programs that are used in hospitals to monitor and manage
the hospital down to like staffing. There was even a
program that was part of Operation Work Speed called AHHS Protect,
and the hospitals had to report how many ventilators were
in use, how many patients were there. I don't know
why my camera just stopped.

Speaker 7 (02:45:56):
That was weird.

Speaker 2 (02:45:57):
Well I still have audio, literally, just I didn't do it.
That's you're back.

Speaker 13 (02:46:05):
So they had this program that hospitals had to report
how many ventilators, how many patients are in the ICU,
how much rend Dezevier, we were using what's our census report?
Like all kinds of information that we that even the
hospital didn't want to have to report. In addition, to
all the other data mining we were doing. And that
program was a pallunteer program called Tiberius, which it's used

(02:46:30):
in Gaza, and that's the one that they used to
assign risk scores. Well, they used that here already in
America during Operation Warp Speed to figure out if you
were vaccinated or not, to target different ethnic groups for vaccines,
and then to figure out where the counter measures, as in,
where did the ventilators need to go, where did the
rend dezevere need to go. So they've already had these

(02:46:55):
programs in place that are tied into our medical records.

Speaker 7 (02:46:59):
And then to hear Mary Ellison.

Speaker 13 (02:47:00):
Say we're going to use your medical records and your DNA,
your personal data to design stuff directly to you. And
then in addition they say we're going to put wearables
on you. They're going to monitor your body at all
times for the purposes of national security.

Speaker 7 (02:47:17):
And I don't know how that doesn't send shivers down
the spine in this country.

Speaker 2 (02:47:22):
Yeah. Absolutely, I mean we look at their big data
things that they have to have total information awareness. Remember,
everybody was creeped out about that, and yet that is
what this really is, the implementation of this the big
data is looking at everything that you're doing, not just online,
but they've got to get it out of cyberspace into
physical space with all these other aspects of it. And

(02:47:42):
companies like Palanteer, they have been focused on geospatial intelligence
and data mining and making all these drawing all these
conclusions about people's politics or religion so forth, based just
on even geospatial intelligence. When they get to additional factors
like this, they know everything about you and we're not

(02:48:03):
allowed to know anything about what they do or the results.
That's why it really is at it's essence, that is
an information war, because you know, it is all the
information that's flowing in one direction, and they have an
insatiable appetite to know everything about everybody. It is part
and parcel of their control, this total knowledge about everyone

(02:48:25):
and everything. And now AI and especially companies like Palanteer,
have given them the ability to go through and collate
this massive amount of data that they've been collecting for
some time. Now they can make sense of it. Because
it was so much information they've been collecting on people,
they couldn't sort through it with humans, and so now
they've got the AI that can sort through this that

(02:48:45):
is what's so concerning about all of this.

Speaker 13 (02:48:48):
And so it really is because when you go on
social media and you're fed an algorithm of like, which
which post do you get to see today.

Speaker 7 (02:48:55):
That's going to be how how our whole lives are run.

Speaker 2 (02:48:59):
Yeah.

Speaker 13 (02:49:00):
I don't know how many people I've known complain about
their algorithm. Oh it's just it's triggering me today, or
I don't know why my algorithms all screwed up and
it's showing me blah blah. Well, imagine if that same
algorithm is now your government gets to make decisions about
if you're a good person or not, and if you
get to go out today, or if you get to
eat today, or if you get to use your money today.

Speaker 2 (02:49:19):
Yeah, that's right. Yeah, it's all about total control. And
of course that guy Lucky Loutnik, Howard Lutnik, who is
bragging about how much money he can make knowing that
the government was going to just flood cash into these
pharmaceutical companies. Now I can go in and I can
make money off of that. Right, So he's got this
insider information. He's the guy that's going to be doing

(02:49:41):
the new public private version of a CBDC and once
they know all your financial transactions, all the rest, any
part of this puzzle would give them pretty much total
control over your life. But they've got so many different
facets where they are monitoring and collating information about you
that it truly is just overwhelming to even try to

(02:50:04):
think about it. But again, it's the ignorance and the
darkness that they have fooled everybody with. That's why it's
so important what you're doing. And again the site is
thrill Kill medicalcult dot com and you're also on substack
and people find that at zowe dot substack dot com,

(02:50:26):
and it's very important for people to use this information
try to wake people up as to what's going on.
They've not only hidden stuff from people, but they have
in terms of inoculation. The one thing they've inoculated you
against is the truth, and they've inoculated you against questioning
what they tell people. And that's why you need to

(02:50:47):
try to wake people up with sites like Zoe's as well.
So is there anything else that you would like to hit.

Speaker 13 (02:50:54):
I just if anyone is interested, I'm going to be
doing a memorial for the people that we've lost to
hospital protocols and vaccine injured, including women who may have had.

Speaker 7 (02:51:08):
A stillbirth or a miscarriage due to the shot.

Speaker 5 (02:51:14):
Ye.

Speaker 13 (02:51:14):
So if you go to my website, there's a page
called vigil and if you'd like to submit a name
of a loved one, you don't have to tell us
anything more, just the name of a loved one. You
could even just put you know, baby boy or baby
girl if you like. And we're going to be lighting
a candle in remembrance of your loved ones. So if

(02:51:37):
you like, please go and submit a name and we
will honor.

Speaker 2 (02:51:40):
Your lost It's important. We cannot forget what they've done
to us, and we cannot forget those that they have killed.
That's absolutely vital. Thank you so much for what you do. Again,
Zoe Smith. Her website is Thrill Kill Medical Cult dot
com and you can find her on substack at Zoe
dot sub stack dot com. And she's felled Zoe, z

(02:52:02):
O w E. Thank you so much for joining us.
We take a quick break, folks, and we will be
right back. Stay with us.

Speaker 11 (02:52:24):
M H.

Speaker 1 (02:52:55):
You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Speaker 12 (02:53:00):
Here News now at apsradionews dot com or get the
APS Radio app and never miss another story.

Speaker 2 (02:53:08):
Well, let's take a look at the AI bubble, and
of course it's kind of interesting soft Bank. You know,
we were just talking about Stargate project Larry Ellison, and
the bank that came in was this Japanese bank called
soft Bank. They're very much invested in technology issues. And
that was what Trump kicked off his second administration with well,

(02:53:31):
soft Bank dumped every single share of Nvidia, and that
had an effect on the entire market, not just on
Nvidia stock. Remember we talked about Michael Burry, the guy
behind the the who sussed out big short who sussed
out what was going on the market, real estate market

(02:53:54):
fraud and bubble, and he focused on shorting in Vidia
as well as Palenteer. And so we've had a lot
of big players and people who are very professional, very savvy,
who are calling bubble. And so in Video went down
by one and a half percent after soft Bank sold

(02:54:15):
all of their shares, and then of course Pollenteer is
also going down. And Valenteer was really the biggest bet
that Michael Burry of the big short put on. It
was actually when he did the big short of over
a billion dollars, which is like eighty percent of his
company or his fond or whatever. So eighty four percent

(02:54:36):
of that short was Palenteer and fourteen percent or sixteen
percent was the in Vidia, And somebody put this up
in verse Kramer. So look at Kramer as being a
contra indicator of what they should invest in. The said
Jim Crater. Jim Cramer. Kramer remains undefeated. And so what

(02:54:56):
they have there is a suite that he put out
as recently as twenty ninth of October, and he was saying,
I'm taking my price target for Pollenteer from two hundred
to two hundred and fifty exclamation mark. Well it went
from two hundred when he said that down to now
about maybe one hundred and sixty five one hundred and seventy.
As I said, he remains undefeated as always being the

(02:55:19):
counter indicator of where things should go. And you know,
when I look at all of this hype about AI robots,
so we got from Elon Musk last week and so
many others, you know, the AI hype, the robotic hype
and everything. This is Russia and their robot that they
wanted to demonstrate. Again, we always hear about Russian bots, right,

(02:55:40):
they're talking about AI that is putting out narratives on
social media. But here's a literal Russian bot and people's
comments are about this. It looks like they used a drunk
to teach us robot how to walk. So that's walking there,
and I watch what happens another couple of steps and

(02:56:01):
just like a drunk, it falls down on the side.
Watches it's coming staggering, that goes down. So let's hope
that is a metaphor for robotics and for AI. Again,
as I said last week, a lot of people are
looking at this and they said, well, you know what,
how does this end. Well, there's only two or three
combinations of this that could go. Either the AI hype

(02:56:26):
and the bubble bursts and takes down the economy big
time or global economy big time, or it is successful
and it takes everybody's jobs. And I said, well, there's
a third alternative that it is sustained by the governments
who use it to control us. And I think that
is true of both AI and robotics. I think that

(02:56:49):
the best use case for all this stuff is tyranny
and totalitarianism. Well, soft Bank dumped their entire Nvidia stake,
but they're not getting out of AI completely, so it's
not a complete pushback against AI. They just decided that
they would move from Nvidia to some other platforms are

(02:57:13):
still involved in AI, and they had just under six
billion dollar steak in Nvidia. And the guy who is
the head of soft bank, his name is go To.
I guess he's the go to guy if you want
some tech capital. I can't say if we're in an
AI bubble or not, said go To, adding that the

(02:57:36):
sale was for capital and can be utilized for our financing.
So he's not going to say that we're in an
AI bubble because he's got some other irons in the
fire and he doesn't want to tank this thing.

Speaker 9 (02:57:46):
I can neither confirm nor deny that we are in
an ALI bubble.

Speaker 2 (02:57:51):
Yeah, but a lot of people have been confirming that
as a matter of fact, Zero Hedge pointed out, I said, well,
we've had four recent articles that are really must read.
Here's the headlines, the AI bubble watchout Metric has just snapped.
AI is now a deut bubble too, quietly surpassing all
banks to become the largest sector in the market. And

(02:58:14):
Sam Altman denying open AI needs a government bailout. He
just wants massive government subsidies. So yeah, we do the
subsidies so we don't have to do the bailout. So
it had in effect the course on Nvidia, but also
on a lot of different stocks. The futures slid down
as AI jitter's return. And yet no matter how many

(02:58:37):
people come out, no matter how many people who are
large and connected come out against this, you still have
the bubble continues to inflate. And another company was involved
in that as well, Core Weave. They rent out access
to the AI chips and they had some interesting issues

(02:58:57):
there and setbacks as well. But this article from Free
Thought Project is very timely. They said it is time
to pay attention. Europe has just eviscerated monetary privacy and
it's going to be coming here to the United States next.
They're basically starting down the path of banning all cash,

(02:59:17):
state run digital money. That's the law that has passed
and it goes live in only four hundred days, and
so they're going to make it criminal to pay cash
for anything over ten thousand euros. But of course that
level is going to continue to come down. That's why
you need to get into physical gold and silver. You've
got to get out of this system, and that's what
they're talking about. They have a lot of different alternatives

(02:59:39):
in this Free Thought Project article. One thing they don't mention,
strangely enough, is physical gold and silver. I think that
is the simplest, easiest, most direct thing to essentially short
the tautalitarianism. That's what you need to be doing. Don't
shorten the market, short that tatalitarianism. Go to David Night
Dye Gold. I'll take you to tony Ardiban's Wolf Gold.

(03:00:00):
Have a good day. Thank you for joining us the
common man. They created common Core, they dumbed down our children.
They created common Past to track and control us. They're

(03:00:23):
Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and
the communist future. They see the common man as simple,
unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity
created in the image of God. That is what we
have in common. That is what they want to take away.

(03:00:46):
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they
want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll
find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening,

(03:01:08):
thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,
please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Ruthie's Table 4

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Wed Episode #2137: The 50-Year Mortgage: How Ultra-Long Loans Destroy The American Dream

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Ruthie's Table 4

The Joe Rogan Experience

All Episodes

Wed Episode #2137: The 50-Year Mortgage: How Ultra-Long Loans Destroy The American Dream

On Purpose with Jay Shetty