Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
The following program contains course language and adult themes. Listener
and dispression is.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
Advised Yesterday, December.
Speaker 3 (00:25):
Nineteen forty one, a date.
Speaker 2 (00:30):
Which will live in infamy.
Speaker 3 (00:38):
Achieving the goal before this decade is out of landing
a man on.
Speaker 4 (00:43):
The moon and returning him safely to the Earth. We
choose to go to the moon and discantay and do
the other thing. Not becuse they are easy, but be
thought they are hard.
Speaker 3 (01:06):
Freedom is never more than one generation away from the
speaking We didn't pass it on to our children in
the blood streets. The only way they can inherit the
freedom we have known if we fight for it, protected, defended,
and then handed.
Speaker 5 (01:20):
To them with the well trought lessons of how they
am their lifetime. Let's do the same, Speaker, and.
Speaker 4 (01:36):
Happy Thursday evening, ladies and gentlemen. I guess Thursday night now,
damn it's late anyway, Hope everybody's having a great Thursday night.
Thank you so much for joining us. It's been a minute,
but Jen and I are back doing the thing and
she's right here with me. So good evening, Miss Jen Homestead.
Speaker 1 (01:51):
How are you. I'm good, I'm glad to be back.
We've had a few weeks of hiatus due to my
late summer family vacations. So but we're back on track.
School started this week and uh, yeah it's been. Uh,
it's been. It was a good summer. I'm sad to
see it go, but.
Speaker 4 (02:12):
Okay, Kayla Radio family, we gotta we got to fix this.
Gens feed is beating both mine and the stations. This
is not cool. We gotta fix this, y'all. We gotta
fix this.
Speaker 1 (02:24):
What can I say, No, I'm playing, but yeah. So
we've just wrapped up our summer here and we had
a good one. Spent some time in the mountains in Colorado,
then took a kind of pretty quick, uh last minute
trip to the beach. So we went all the way
down to South Padre and uh came back just in
time for meet the teacher, because we do things.
Speaker 4 (02:47):
Yeah, we went through that with Gracie day before yesterday,
and her first day was today.
Speaker 1 (02:51):
So yeah, our first day was yesterday. So uh, it's
my last the last Thursday of my kiddo went elementary school.
And I'm not like, I don't get super sentimental about
all this stuff, but there's something about that that's just like.
Speaker 4 (03:07):
No, no, the rest of it.
Speaker 1 (03:12):
I know, I know it's not fair. I don't want it.
Speaker 4 (03:14):
Stop stop stop, You're welcome.
Speaker 1 (03:16):
I'll take I'll take fifth grade all day. But the
good news, the good news is is that we had
a We had a really pretty we struggled through last year.
We didn't have the best teacher situation, we had a
principal change mid school year, all kinds of things, and
it was just and he had a he had an injury,
so he was out for several weeks for like in
(03:37):
the middle of the year when they were kind of
height of learning for you know, standardized tests and all
of that stuff, and so it was just a really
frustrating year. My kid that loved school was really like
dreading it and couldn't wait to like not have to
go to school anymore, which is so unlike him. So
we're really excited. He's got a great teacher and he
(03:57):
really really likes her so far, and we really do too,
and I think it's just gonna be a much different situation,
which is awesome.
Speaker 4 (04:03):
So yay, yay, And uh, I think people are doing
it now just to spite me, because you're completely kicking
my ass. On two feeds by yourself.
Speaker 1 (04:15):
I definitely am doing it to spite you.
Speaker 4 (04:17):
No, I don't mean you, I mean everybody else.
Speaker 1 (04:20):
Oh yeah, well they're definitely gonna do it. They're gonna
be like no drop drop the other ones go beyond gens.
Speaker 4 (04:26):
Yeah, with numbers are numbers. I really don't care anyway.
So I made an interesting discovery the other day. I
guess we're I guess we're now beta testing Rock version
two and Rock version two can do some pretty kick
ass AI images as long as you're patient with it.
Speaker 1 (04:45):
Is that? Where are is that where our COMMI image
came from?
Speaker 3 (04:49):
Today?
Speaker 4 (04:50):
Yes, there's that one. And then there's this one that
I have been sharing around. I didn't actually expect it
to be able to do this one, this one, this
one actually took a few attempts to get it right.
I'm about to put it on the screen. It's not
littered into the system yet. But this one surprised me
because I had to try really hard to get this
one to work, and I couldn't believe how well it
(05:12):
actually did it. After the like the seven.
Speaker 1 (05:14):
Three cry, Wait, that's great.
Speaker 4 (05:21):
I'm about to put this on a fucking T shirt.
I'm not even playing.
Speaker 1 (05:26):
Oh that's awesome.
Speaker 4 (05:28):
I couldn't believe it because the first few times I
was like, no, that's not quite right. And then there
was one time that it actually had them. She was
like throwing them across the road while the bus was
running towards them, and I'm like, yeah, that's not good.
That'll be too violent.
Speaker 1 (05:42):
Yeah, you just want to like shove, you just want
to like having to fall out the bus. You can
close the doors real quick.
Speaker 4 (05:48):
And then it did it with like the normal three
D imaging. I was like, nah, I didn't look quite right.
So I redid the thing and I said, and if possible,
make them more of caricature. And then it spit that
one out and I was like, this is almost perfect.
And then the more I looked at it, I was like,
you know what, I'm not even gonna try anymore because
that's fucking amazing.
Speaker 1 (06:07):
Now, that is hilarious.
Speaker 4 (06:09):
I should have told it to put Venn diagrams in
the windows.
Speaker 1 (06:14):
No, this is perfect. It's simple. It's to the point
it's everybody knows what it is. That's hilarious. I love it.
Speaker 4 (06:21):
But yeah, it was just it was just fun. And
I mean, I've been having way too much fun with
crop doing AI though, because I mean, to think about
it is to do decent AI, you have to pay
for a subscription because even like the one that I've
been playing with to do some station stuff, it's like, well,
you get this many credits and then you have to
start paying us to get more credits. I'm like, yeah,
(06:42):
I just use it. I'll just use it till the
run out of credits, and it's done some amazing things.
I mean, we have like a mock up for a
digital beacon news desk now when I need it, Yeah,
which is right there, Ordie and I can do a
show now from a circle K parking lot. Yes, I
mean there's all kinds of fun things that we can
do with it. But now because I'm already paying for premium,
(07:05):
I can do the same thing with Grog, and Grog
is actually better than I expected to be at it.
Speaker 1 (07:11):
I need to play with it. I definitely need to
play with it. I I played for a while with
because I could do the one through being and it
was like you got like however many free a day,
but then also like depending on your search points, so
like if you'd like just do like ten more searches
of something just like Google, Kamala, Google, Trump, Google whatever,
(07:34):
like ten more Google or not Google bing searches. Ten
more bing searches would afford you three more tokens for
three more AI like created images. So there are some
things like that that I was playing with for a
little while.
Speaker 4 (07:50):
Something is then you need an age of verification to
tune into the circle case show. Yes, you just saying
definitely need my.
Speaker 1 (08:01):
Husband go check on what's going on outside. There's like
lights and then hear horns beeping, and like we live
in a in a place for like at night, like
you don't accidentally come this way. Well people pass by,
but like you don't. There's not like traffic jams in
the park. There's no like area to have like a
traffic jam or like weird anyways.
Speaker 4 (08:23):
So do I need to keep our guests entertained?
Speaker 1 (08:26):
No, I think it's I think it's okay. I'm just
gonna chext my husband real quick and be like, uh,
what's happening outside? We also do we have there is
like a transformer kind of near our property, so sometimes
they come out to do stuff on that and they
will come at the most random times, like you ever know,
like it'll blow every now and then, and they'll like
come out at two o'clock in the morning, and we're like, really, like,
(08:49):
you can't get you can't get service from people that
like work for the government, like in a nine to
you can't get them to nail down within a nine
to five period when they're gonna come help you with something,
but like something like this, they'll be like, oh yeah, no,
like we're servicing your area, and they'll just come like
when it happens whenever I don't understand. I'm like, it's great,
thank you, awesome, but I don't know why, Like sometimes
(09:12):
that's the case, and other times it's like, I don't know,
we'll see you in seven to ten business days. It
doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 4 (09:19):
It's kind of like when kind of kind of like
when I used to set in installation and and freaking
service call appointments when I worked for Direct TV, when
I was doing their whole high speed internet bullshit, and
I was like, I can have somebody there by next
Tuesday between the hours of eight and twelve. They're like,
can you narrow that down anymore? Like no, not really,
I know.
Speaker 1 (09:40):
Well, it's funny there are things like that that you know,
are kind of so all around, but then like here
in Austin because and there's other places that are like
this too. Our animal control actually for certain calls are
crazy awesome. Like I we've there's a lot of bats
(10:01):
here and so you can and they do carry diseases,
and they get injured, and they follow on your property
or you know, on your car, or they get in
your house sometimes because some of them are small, like
bird like small sparrows or something, they're like that little
and some of them are big. But we've had an
almost everybody has an experience with one getting in a house,
(10:21):
being found, you know, on their walkway something like that,
and they want you to call like immediately, like they
don't want they don't want, you know, anybody touching them.
They don't want animals to accidentally pick them up or
anything like that. So I had a situation where I
was still like I was running an event. I didn't
get home until like two forty five in the morning,
(10:43):
open the door, was bringing stuff in, and a bat
flew into my house and was flying all over. I
called three one one. They were like, okay, we'll send
someone out right away. Can you trap it in a
room and I was like, well, I went into this room,
They're like close the doors, don't touch it, like make
sure there's not a fan on that can hurt it.
And that I thought for sure they were just gonna
be like, Okay, leave a message, we'll send someone tomorrow.
(11:05):
And no, they're like skippy jump, like let's go. We
come out and this girl comes out with all her
gear and like gets it done that night at like
three o'clock in the morning. I've had them come at
like one pm, at like five pm, but in the
middle of the night it was crazy. Anyways, that was
a oh I just found out they're repaving. What this
(11:29):
is nuts?
Speaker 4 (11:30):
Wait in the middle of the night.
Speaker 1 (11:32):
What it's nine twenty. I mean, you can't really close
this road down during daytime because it's only one way in,
one way out and it goes back for several miles,
like ten miles and dead ends into the lake, so
like you can't you can't really shut it down at
any given time. So I guess that's why they're doing
(11:53):
it now. But that's random.
Speaker 4 (11:55):
Yeah, I mean that does seem a little weird even
to me.
Speaker 1 (11:58):
But uh, also I don't even know why, like it
needs repaving. It's it's just it's not even traveled enough.
You know what I'm saying, whatever, Okay, County, do your thing.
Speaker 4 (12:08):
You know what, this is just reaffirming to me, right
what you and your you and your husband are actually
secret agents and they're setting up a hit on your.
Speaker 1 (12:19):
No, they're redoing it to make sure that we have
the proper the proper roadway to land a small aircraft
if need be.
Speaker 4 (12:28):
I could see that.
Speaker 1 (12:31):
They're taking care of us. Anyways, Oh Kamala.
Speaker 4 (12:37):
I mean, I guess we kind of have to, since
she's you know, eating up the entire news cycle even
though she's not really doing anything to earn it. But
then again, she got the I mean, think about this
for a second. She got the nomination without having to
earn it. She got a Time magazine cover without without
having to earn it. She got her first ever job
that was of any import. I mean, I wouldn't say
(13:00):
technically she didn't earn it. I Y very good. I
just I mean, I guess, I guess on the upside is,
you know, there's there's there's something that both the the
nominee and are the presidential nominee and the vice presidential
nominee both have in common now they're both sturped seemen.
(13:28):
Did I mentioned we have a shirt for that too,
limited time only, But we do have a shirt for that,
so you guys might want to order it while you can't.
Oh boy, well wrong one. But yeah, this one too.
We all we also have free order because that never
goes out of style, but we also have just say
nay Harrison Harris Walls for four. Wow, I'm having a
(13:51):
little too much fun with the story, can you tell?
Speaker 1 (13:53):
I know you're I've hardly been able to like really
be online because of those said family time vacations. But
like almost every time I prop in pop into our
you know, our kailer in chat room or whatever, it's
like Rick's got a new shirt up. Oh, here's a
new design. Here's another one. It's awesome. Well it's good because,
(14:14):
like you're doing things that are prescient, so you know,
people want to get it for that period of time
and then it's remembered and it's funny and you know,
it's one of those things that people always say, like
making a T shirt and then you're like, no, I'm
literally making them T shirts.
Speaker 4 (14:30):
We have. This one took kind of proud of this one.
Good got it to look pretty close to the original,
But this one's actually made out of like corduroly and
is embroidered, so it's pretty damn durable too.
Speaker 1 (14:41):
That's cool.
Speaker 4 (14:43):
But anyway, hey, lots of people are scanning them. Lots
of people do that and they don't order and it
makes me sad, but at least they're scanning them.
Speaker 1 (14:51):
We're going to take a peek, you know, and then
you like save the link and you go back and
look later. I'm I'm definitely someone that does that.
Speaker 4 (14:58):
Yeah, yeah, I know, giving everybody a hard time anyway,
So yeah, I mean, we definitely, I mean, I guess
we have to talk about it because I guess tomorrow
we're gonna find out for sure if she officially is
Kami Lama Hamasnik. She's already copy Lama Hamasnik because she
just she's stealing a lot of her policies from everybody else,
one of her so not only the no tax on
(15:20):
tips things. Right like, the next day after no tax
on Tips, one of her spokespeople basically called the media
fake news but.
Speaker 1 (15:28):
Nicer, which is hilarious considering that they are just giving
her a fucking toumb bath every single day, every time
they mentioned anything.
Speaker 4 (15:38):
That was an image I didn't need.
Speaker 1 (15:39):
I'm sorry, it's just it's outrageous.
Speaker 4 (15:42):
You got me back from my potus viep comment.
Speaker 1 (15:46):
So now, I mean it's just ridiculous. I mean, everything's
about joy and hope and how inspiring and wonderful, and
it's you know, his historic goal and it's an there's
just like no questions. I mean, she's not done interviews.
She bypasses the press constantly and they still sing her praise.
(16:08):
She just giggles her way through everything. There's been no
policy sets at all, except for these couple of things
that have been said or leaked. But like, there's been
no policy set. She hasn't had to answer any question
about anything about moving forward. I mean, in fact, KGP
is having to feel most of those questions about what
her potential administration would be, and she keeps having to
(16:30):
be like, this is the Biden Harris administration, not the
Harris administration. It's like, but is it though? Id K?
And you know that it's just it's just all rainbows
and sunshine, and for them to act like they are
at all being held to some sort of standard by
the press, or that they're being persecuted or even even remotely,
(16:54):
just even the smallest amount of criticism is just laughable.
They are just rolling out the red carpet and singing
the praises, which we need.
Speaker 4 (17:06):
Well. I mean, and I talked about this a little
bit with Stacy yesterday, But the press at this point
reminds me of and I guess, I guess she put
it in an even better way. The press reminds me
of a spouse married to an alcoholic, because no matter
how badly that spouse treats you, you keep chasing the attention.
(17:27):
Like Time magazine gave her a cover and she didn't
even agree to sit down for the interview. She didn't
even show up for a picture, so they sketched her
like you kidding me, What the hell.
Speaker 1 (17:41):
It's a weird sort of idolization situation. But I mean,
which we come to expect from Democrats, but this and
from you know, the media cohorts.
Speaker 4 (17:51):
But it's just I've never seen this. This is I mean,
I could almost understand it with Obama sort of because
that's kind of where we are right now.
Speaker 1 (18:00):
Get it. With Obama, I think you know.
Speaker 4 (18:03):
You I agree that they did, but at least he
was our at least he was semi intelligent, even if
he is a communist. She can put two sentences together when.
Speaker 1 (18:11):
You no, I agree there. I just think that they
they can't help themselves, you know, I mean until towards
the end. I mean they were also just like completely
kid glove with Hillary. She wouldn't answer any questions and
they were just fawning all over her. I'm with her.
She's the first female Da da da da da da da,
(18:34):
and she's completely unlikable. You know. Kamala at least comes
off as like I mean, she's got a pretty smile.
She's seems to be able to, you know, laugh with people,
be enjoyable to be around. She may be dumb as
all get out, and she may have slept your way
to the top, but she seems pretty you know, she
seems like a pretty likable person in general if you
(18:55):
just look at how she you know, how she conducts
herself and how she relates to people. She didn't know
what to say to them. It's always just word salid
but but you know, she seems likable enough. She'll though
she'll a snapper fingers and jam a little, and she'll
laugh at your silly joke, and she'll go to SNL
and you know, all that kind of stuff that these others,
(19:17):
you know, had taken themselves too seriously to do. So
she doesn't come off as crazy and likable. And that's
the thing she has over Hillary as far as claiming
the woman mantra. You know, she gets to be the
historic woman to run. She was already historically the first
vice president woman. Also of color. You know, all of
that stuff that is justly all the time by people
(19:40):
on the right hand the left. Oh she is black,
No she's not. No, she's this, No, she's that, Well,
she's half this, well, she's part that. Blah blah blah blah,
and all that semantical shit that like, unfortunately isn't gonna
make a damn bit of difference. But everybody's obsessed with
on both sides. But she has the added element that
Hillary never had, which is she's attractive and she's actually
(20:02):
you know, even though her position was laughable, she didn't
have to accomplish months much as VP. We don't have
much that we have to like, we say she lacks
a record, which we're right. But the other side says,
there's like not a bad record to hold her accountable on,
whereas like Hillary had Secretary of State. You know, this
was a very consequential role that had very real repercussions
(20:26):
and a very real record to judge her on, and
that she was held to by a lot of people.
Kama gets to just kind of write the way and
anything that's bad. She can kind of be like, well,
I mean, I wasn't president. Yes, I'm yes, it's the
Biden Harris administration, but really, how much control does the
vice president have? And she'd be fucking right, so they
(20:49):
can kind of, you know, slide on in in that
way that Hillary was never going to be able to.
So she's got her looks, she's got a lack of record,
which is actually going to benefit her in this case
because she's still held the second highest office in the land.
And then she's got the attractives of the likability thing.
(21:10):
And then also of course the adoring press that wants
the historic moment of a female president and not just
that but one of color.
Speaker 4 (21:21):
Yeah. Well, I mean, and I think that's part of
it is there's I mean, so I guess part of
what I want to talk about because I've never seen
this before. I mean, I know you know this, but
we have a lot of new listeners. I've been doing
this for a very long time. I was completely blown
away by something yesterday because I saw for the first
time ever a poll on even Fox News with a
(21:41):
margin of error of plus or minus seven, which, if
you don't know how they do the margin of error is,
what they do is they take their oversample rate and
then they add a couple numbers to it to try
to compensate. The standard over sample rate is about plus four,
so are usually well, I guess they are not even
(22:01):
really doing that anymore. It's usually it used to be
the oversample rate plus one or two points for spillage,
but now I guess they just do the oversample rate.
So that's why you're always seeing poles with like plus
or minus two, plus or minus three, plus or minus four,
which is where we were with Biden, because it started
at plus or minus two and then they started oversampling
(22:21):
dims even more to try to give him a bit
of a cushion, and it didn't work well. So the
same thing happened with her, because for the first week
after he was gone, they were still sampling a plus
or minus four with most of the if you go
into the underpinnings, most of it was still standard communication
methods like phones, things like that, and so it was
(22:42):
and then that didn't work. So a couple of weeks
ago they went to plus seven. The most recent polls
that everybody's talking about that have her supposedly within striking distance,
they have recalibrated yet again. This is the third third
time in about three and a half weeks that they
have completely revamped how they're doing poles. They are now weighted,
they are now weighted almost fifty percent to however, they
(23:04):
track online responses and they are now plus they're now
d plus ten, and she's still barely hanging in. If
they would just go back to not doing the oversample
shit and just do an actual sampling with no well
we're going to try to accommodate for you know, supposed
crowd enthusiasm, et cetera, she'd be underwater right now. But
(23:27):
I kind of I think I finally figured out why
the media is doing what they're doing, because everybody's in
and under this point. For them to be oversampling that high,
they don't think she can win either, what they're trying
to do right now is get the base energized again
so they don't lose the Senate. And they're trying to
keep the fundraising fundraising from brying up because if they
left Biden at the top of the ticket, the Democratic
(23:49):
Party was going to implode.
Speaker 1 (23:50):
Yeah, well yeah, and I think that. And they want
to capitalize on writing this high of you know, the
announcement but still ongoing after you know, a couple weeks
where you're just getting that resurgence of oh, thank god,
it's not Biden. You've got a good section of Democrats,
(24:12):
especially younger ones, that are like, thank goodness, and so
they truly are like excited about it in that way,
but maybe not overall as a demographic is motivated to
actually go vote or answer a polling phone call or
whatever else, because I mean, let's get real, that's just
not how the younger generations, no matter how much we
(24:36):
get out the vote, rock the vote, try to get
the celebrities to say stuff. I mean, it's just not
the demographic that votes in heavy numbers. And you know,
they always think this will be the election that changes that,
but it hasn't changed in like seventy fucking years. It's
just the way of the world. It's like how people
think they know everything when they're twenty two, and then
(24:57):
they get to be thirty and they're like, holy should
I knew nothing at twenty And then you're forty and
you're like, I knew nothing at thirty. I mean, it's
just the progression, the natural progression of human nature. And
voting is one of those things that just there are
certain people that always do and always will, and then
there's a huge portion of society that never does and
(25:17):
never will. And then there's the ones that start to
value their their civic responsibilities a little bit more the
older that they get. And so even if they slap
all the stickers on and they raw raw round and
they like hold up the signs that they're protest by
their dorms and all that kind of stuff, and they
(25:37):
act like they're so engaged and they're so intelligent and
knowledgeable and in the know, when it comes down to it,
most of them still don't go take the time out
to go vote in a presidential election. They just don't.
So they can ride this high rise wave of her
and they and the media, and then Democrats have to
capitalize on it and all the little excitement from certain demographics.
(26:02):
You know that there is a good chunk of you know,
black democrats. Of course, they are very excited. A lot
of women, feminist women that are very excited. And then,
like I said, the youth crowd. But we'll see how
many of them have lasting power because they think the rough,
you know, the rouge is gonna wear off a little bit.
Speaker 4 (26:20):
Well, I mean, and that's just it.
Speaker 3 (26:22):
You know.
Speaker 4 (26:22):
The other thing that I find absolutely amazing is the
fact that even today the Kamala campaign account put out
that Joe Bider that Donald Trump agreed to two debates
and we're doing the second one as stipulated. And I'm like,
you haven't done a single fucking debate yet. So he
agreed with two debates to Joe Biden, you're not Joe Biden.
Why are we only why are we only getting one
(26:44):
debate with you? But let me explain to you why
we're only getting one debate with you? Word salad, That's
why we're only getting one debate. They want her on
prompter as long as possible. She they've already they've already
because just a couple of days ago, when when when
Trump kind of actor into a corner with that first pressure,
she was like, well, I want to sit down with
and get it, get something put on the schedule with
(27:05):
my team to sit down with some of you guys
before the end of the month. And now our campaign's like, uh,
we mean to even do that until sometime after Labor
Day if we do it at all.
Speaker 1 (27:17):
So I'm gonna be a little bit I guess this
opinion is a little bit unpopular amongst the right, But
I totally understand that Donald Trump agreed to debates with
Joe Biden. I understand the semantics of hitting on that
we like, we agreed to him. We didn't agree to
(27:38):
anybody else. We agreed to him, and his campaign absolutely
has every right to point that out in any of
the ways that they try to change this up, which
they dramatically changed it up by switching nominees completely. But
I also find it kind of a I don't know,
I feel like it's just kind of a bullshit sort of.
(28:01):
I think it's just something to own the libs on
and not really anything of substance to make that argument
and to keep hounding on it, because the fact of
the matter was, if she had been if Biden had
stepped down forever ago, or if he hadn't, even it
doesn't matter who was running, he was going to debate them.
He can say he wasn't going to all day, but
I promise you eventually Trump was going to debate whoever
(28:23):
was running at least once, even if you know it
had been someone else in office at this point and
then someone else entirely taking over as a Democratic nominee,
like say, say they twenty fifth them and Kamala was
in office and everything takes so bad that they wouldn't
even put her up, and it was newsomer it was
Eventually he was going to debate them. Whoever was in charge,
(28:43):
whoever is the nominee for the Democrats, He's going to
debate them. And it matters, but not all that much
when you have months to prepare. So I just think
it's kind of like it's definitely something to point out.
I think people are harping on it a whole hell
of a lot, and I just don't think it is
that much, and it makes it look I feel like
(29:03):
it makes the Trump campaign look pretty small and petty
and like they really aren't prepared to battle this woman,
which of course they are, and of course she's not
a worry I know, but they weren't for a long time,
and they were putting out all this bullshit and everybody
was lapping it up and falling in line. And I'm
just saying that I get it, totally within the right
(29:24):
to do that, but it was I just feel like
it's kind of done because of course he's capable of
debating her. He's going to barrier that was not going
to be in question, so just cut it out. And
like all the people on the right that continue to
make that excuse over and over and over, it's like
they're setting it up in case. I'm like, well, guess what,
the media is not going to call it for him.
(29:44):
Just get yourselves ready for that right now. They're not
going to They never did before. They were only had
to with the Biden thing because it was so painfully
obvious with Biden that he was in such decline and
he couldn't even manage to get through a few minutes
of a question staying on track, not because he was
trying to steer the conversation elsewhere, but because he was
(30:04):
so declined in his mental capacity. So you're not going
to get that gift again where the media for the
last twenty five thirty years, the media always gives it
to the Democrat no matter what. So just prepare yourselves.
It won't matter. Trump will destroy Kamala and the media
will still sa Kamala one.
Speaker 4 (30:24):
I get all that. But the point that I've been
trying to make, and the point that a lot of
other people that do this on the daily now have
been trying to make, is when we agreed to two
debates under very strict circumstances, it was because their nominee
at the time was only semi alive between the hours
of ten and four, so they were trying not overworking.
(30:45):
That's not the case anymore, So why is it that
you know at first it was well, he's never he's
never going to debate me because he keeps backing down.
So it is his first press conference. He's like, I
want a debater on this day. I want a debater
on this day, and I want a debater on this day,
and it'll be on this network, this network, and then
this network. And now she's like, well, we only agreed
to the two. I'm like, well, then you owe him one,
(31:07):
so you need to do at least one more because
you didn't do the first one. But and now they're
now they're they're just saying, no, we agreed to the
one on the tenth, and that's the one that we're
going to do. And I'm to me that just that's
disingenuous to the American people. And I get it. I
understand why they're doing it, and their campaign thinks they're
doing it smart because they've got enough of the Dems
(31:27):
to come home where if nothing else, they're saving down ballot.
I understand this, and they still may manage to pull
it off because a lot of the under a lot
of the eighteen to twenty six crowd are really really
pro communism. So because it's funny because just two days
ago I heard her say she wasn't for single payer anymore,
and then like three hours ago, her her can't her
(31:49):
campaign account actually I think it was actually her Kamala
Harris account put out a tweet that said healthcare shouldn't.
Healthcare should be a right, not just afforded to those
who are going to And I'm like, oh, so she's
going back to the medicare thing. Awesome, So we're gonna
We're just gonna get full on communism because she's already
trying to do price controls with housing. She's gonna announce
(32:10):
price she's supposed to announce price controls with food tomorrow.
Now she's going to go back to medicare for all.
So I mean, yeah, she's literally just stealing everything out
of Stalin's playbook. Good job.
Speaker 1 (32:20):
Wait didn't you see Jeff's comment he said they can
only have two because school has started back up and
all the short busses are going to be in use.
Speaker 4 (32:29):
I did not see that. Wait I didn't know see
it too.
Speaker 1 (32:35):
That's awesome anyways, Yeah, no, no, and I and I
agree with you. I agree with you. I just think
for so long, for several weeks, everybody on the right
was really harping on the like we didn't agree to
him with you, we agree to him with Biden. It's
like that's true, and that's a way to then pivot
this into a different direction. But to just be like
(32:57):
Trump shouldn't even at all because no, da da which
still lots of columns written about it and shit, and
I'm like, what are we doing? Like he was always
gonna debate whoever was coming up. Hell, he probably debate
just another Democrat that asked right now, if he could
get them to agree to certain things, he'd probably be like,
I mean, Trump loves an interview, Trump loves a time
(33:18):
to talk, Trump loves a time. He loves a townhill.
How many of those stupid town halls did he do?
When all of us were going just stop, don't do
it because it's just gonna be fun wrong, Like stop,
And when they were like, we're not gonna televise his rallies,
I was like, thank god, thank god, Like, let's not tall,
(33:38):
just show the crowds and be like we're not putting
his bs on TV. And I'm like, great, you're helping
him perfect.
Speaker 4 (33:46):
But no, I mean, so my thing right because this
brings up another thing was absolutely driving me crazy with's
the folks on my side? Because all I heard in
twenty sixteen is what you're talking about right now? Why
is he doing so many rallies? Why is he not
doing things through like and going into like influencers, podcast
spaces and things like that. The rallies aren't doing anything
but getting up the base he needs to get out
(34:07):
to other people. Fast forward to twenty twenty four. Why
is he going on x why is he doing this podcast?
Why has he only done two rallies in two weeks?
This is a month after he got shot, by the way,
And I'm like, you people are just never fucking happy
because in sixteen, when he wasn't doing the things that
he's doing, now you were bitching that he wasn't doing
him and he was doing him any rallies, And now
you're bitching because he's doing the things and not doing
(34:28):
enough rallies? Can you pick a lane?
Speaker 1 (34:30):
And I do think and I do think like the
criticism of doing like one thing a week would be
extremely that like coming up to this point, like we're
getting into fall now, would be extremely valid if if
a couple of things. One he hadn't just been shot.
Two that's a big one. I don't know, it was
kind of.
Speaker 4 (34:50):
Big, not according to the media maybe.
Speaker 1 (34:55):
But that whole thing had just happened. Two he just
finished with the Republican National Convention, which was also like
highly charged and emotional because we'd just come off of
the week before were that had happened. So you've got
a lot of way to drive after that. Then the
Biden Kamala thing comes out, and I think it's pretty
smart of the campaign to just let them have that spotlight.
(35:17):
I know there's a lot of people that said, no,
go counter it. Now it's silent, you've killed your momentum
blah blah, blah blah. I don't really think so. I
think let them have that spotlight, because they were going
to talk over you anyways. They weren't going to promote
the things anyways. You were just going to give her
fodder to comment on in the media too. So let
them ride that spotlight, let that light flicker out, and
then hit back hard. And then the other reason why
(35:40):
I'm just kind of meant about all that is because
he knew he had this thing with Elon planned that
was going to be the biggest thing of the last
two weeks that he could possibly do to put himself
out there and push his campaign forward. So you have
on the either side of that, a week behind and
a week in front of that. You can have the
luxury of not hitting the ground running too hard. And
(36:02):
now I'm not talking about ground game, I'm talking about
him being visible. You could afford that to not be
doing that, knowing that you're going to have probably thought
at least five hundred million views and now it's looking
like it's over a billion, so that you know, you've
(36:23):
got those all those things that play here. So I
think the campaign really had the ability to just kind
of let let him rest, let these things play out,
let the RNC hype kind of died down, let the
Kamala hype died down, go full force with Elon, and
then now you've really got to kind of start hitting
it hard. And I do agree though, like from the
(36:44):
previous criticisms, I agree that like the rallies aren't the
only answer should be a big part of it. That's fine,
but it's surely like people aren't venturing out to go
to rallies that are just curious unless they're like a
local journalist wants to go see what it's all about
and maybe report on it. Most average people aren't taking
(37:06):
that time, and usually you have to travel to him anyways,
so it's probably not best to do all rallies. But
he didn't do that before either. He mixes it all in,
so we'll just see what his next step is. But
I think I think the campaign did a fine job
the last several weeks after his assassination. They maybe could
have hit on it a little harder hear it there.
(37:28):
I don't know, but it's I don't think any I
don't think there were any like major errors in that
in that regard.
Speaker 4 (37:37):
Yeah, no, I oh, speaking of before I forget this,
speaking of media personalities, you know, going to allies and stuff.
Did you hear what happened to mister potato head right now?
Speaker 1 (37:50):
Oh?
Speaker 4 (37:52):
So Stetler tried to get creds for the pressure today
and was denied.
Speaker 1 (38:00):
Why is that so funny?
Speaker 4 (38:02):
Well, I'm sad he didn't see my reply because I
replied to him and I said, well, there's no wonder
you didn't get kids. Silly potatoes, aren't people.
Speaker 1 (38:12):
I mean, mister potato head.
Speaker 4 (38:15):
I was sad he didn't see it.
Speaker 1 (38:16):
But oh man, well you know he's only thirty eight,
thirty seven, thirty eight, it's thirty eight, now it's thirty eight. Well,
I've been doing this bit since he was thirty five,
so I have to remember what year it is because
I've been doing this. He's only thirty five, he's only
(38:37):
thirty seven. For it's been that long because I started
when he was thirty five.
Speaker 4 (38:43):
Wow, Just to put this in context, though, Walls and
Harris are six months apart in age.
Speaker 1 (38:50):
Oh well, I've said for a while. I made a
joke about that not long ago. It's like he's he's sixty.
What he's only sixty? What is happening here?
Speaker 4 (39:01):
Yeah? So before I started getting the weird vibe from
the guy, like when he was doing the whole White
Dudes for Harris Call, the first thing I thought I
was fucking ed Asner. And then for the longest time
I couldn't une see it. Now now anytime I see
the fucker, all I get is fucking Brian Denny playing
John Wayne Gacy. Oh no, every fucking time. Oh stop,
(39:26):
you're welcome for that image, because now let me stuck
with you do. Oh no, you're welcome.
Speaker 1 (39:34):
That's fantastic.
Speaker 4 (39:36):
You're welcome, dude. It's the vibe though, right, because he's
always so overbubbly everywhere and weird. And then I mean,
there's no way that the dude's not closeted. Have you
seen the two handed wave?
Speaker 1 (39:50):
No, I haven't focused on that.
Speaker 4 (39:53):
But you haven't. You haven't seen the two handed waves?
Like I don't have a video yet, I'll limited.
Speaker 1 (40:00):
My limited what I've seen on all of this because
of trying to actually enjoy real life for a little bit.
But ugh, well, and I do think I was gonna
say too, you know, I think that there are some
valid points to be made about the claims with his record.
(40:21):
I think there are others that like, just move on
and let go, because there's there's the one superior that
says one thing and he turns out is not directly
his superior. Then there's the other superior that says, no,
this did happen. Well then, and there's people that are going
to fight all the way up and down that are retired.
There are vets that are non that are this and
about what's appropriate to say and claim what and when.
(40:44):
And I think most of us know the right and
wrong answer, but can also understand that like some of
that is not really neither here nor there in the
way that the evidence is actually presented on it. And
the fact is he served, you know, for a long time.
And I don't think the right's gonna win a whole
(41:04):
lot of points by trying to push too much of
that that's not obviously egregious error the whole Like.
Speaker 6 (41:12):
Did he know he was deploying and he put in
his retirement and he went ahead and abandoned him and
all that shit.
Speaker 1 (41:17):
When it's like there's so many things that go into
that that is just so arguable. I think that it
just becomes a semantic fight that nobody really wins, and
it people get bogged down in it, like the Normans
or just go, Okay, that's just too much to explain
to me.
Speaker 6 (41:34):
Oh six months you had to put it in and
there was this, but he might have known, but then
it was February, then was this, and nah blah blah,
and then he could have and he should have been
maybe this and maybe that molled this one guy and
that one guy, and the majority of people that aren't
politicals like us just their eyes crossed and they tune
it out.
Speaker 1 (41:48):
So I think there's a lot of shit that like
just needs to be There are so many political things
to hit him on it's not even funny, and hit
him on the fact that he has allowed people to
believe if he retired a certain way.
Speaker 4 (42:02):
Sure well as SOO see that, that's my thing, right.
So for everybody that's like, oh my god, quit demeaning
his service. He's served for twenty four years, we're not
the ones demeaning his service. He did as soon as
he took it upon himself to embellish it, he demeaned
his service. There's no reason he should have done that.
It was very simple. The first time anytime he stood
(42:22):
the first time he stood up in Congress and they
started talking about how he was a retired command sergeants
and combat he should have said, no, I would like
to set the record straight. I was frocked as a
command sergeant major, but I retired from the military before
my unit deployed, and when I retired, they bumped me
back down the master sergeant.
Speaker 1 (42:41):
All right, I didn't complete my qualifications. That's all he
has to say. I didn't complete the qualifications because I
opted for a retirement. Boom done. There is nothing dishonorable about.
Speaker 4 (42:51):
That, absolutely nothing. And then then this still may have
come up though, because they still would have probably at
a press conference at some point once he got the
odd for VP, they probably would have said, well, why
did you why did you wind up? If if you
go if you got the rumors in advance, why did
you go ahead? And because the other issue with everybody
is he actually violated his enlistment contractor retire so he
(43:14):
broke his contract because he just signed a new one,
so he was still entitled to do that because he'd
already put in twenty three.
Speaker 1 (43:20):
Yeah you you, but you're already at retirement age because
so technically you can do that any fucking time.
Speaker 4 (43:25):
I understand that, But that's one of the reasons why
everybody said, I understand.
Speaker 1 (43:28):
But that, but that, But again that semantic, little nitty
bitty gritty stuff that is actually like, it's not wrong,
and you're trying to make it not you. People are
trying to make it appear wrong of someone. People that
have reached the retirement age, no matter what they've done
in that in that service, in that particular area of service,
can at any time en act of retirement as long
(43:49):
as they put it in properly, which he did. So
you can say, well you should have could have would
a and I guess hold him to some moral ground
on that of like, well, if you knew they were
going to and though you already spent twenty four years,
and you just should have been loyal to them and
gone with them and stayed in another two years despite
what's best for you and your family after all these
(44:10):
years of service. I mean, I just don't think that's
very fair, and it's being portrayed as wrong though it's
being portrayed as it is being portrayed as wrong.
Speaker 4 (44:21):
There were some there are seven other people in the
National Guard in his in his fellow battalions.
Speaker 1 (44:28):
No, it's a personal choice. Though that's not a moral
wrong or or it's certainly not a certainly not a
legal wrong, which is what is being portrayed by the right.
Speaker 4 (44:38):
Nobody's saying that he.
Speaker 1 (44:39):
Violated Yeah, people have said he violated his service. He
absolutely abandoned his troops and that that.
Speaker 4 (44:44):
That is so technically he did.
Speaker 1 (44:48):
Technically here martialed, and it was technically a broken contract
that you had to fulfill here martialed.
Speaker 4 (44:56):
He agreed to a two year service.
Speaker 1 (44:58):
He agreed to it, and then he decided otherwise, which
was within his right to do. So. It's not broken
in the way that could be disciplinary, and people portray
it like it's disciplinary. No, it's not.
Speaker 4 (45:11):
What I'm trying to explain to you is though you're
looking at this who and.
Speaker 1 (45:14):
Explain to me all you want to Like, I'm a
little girl. I understand these things, and I have friends
that have been in this position. I have extensive knowledge
of this within my personal life, so.
Speaker 4 (45:24):
Do I, which is why I was trying to Okay, and.
Speaker 1 (45:26):
We have a difference of opinion on how this is handled.
I just think it's disingenuous to set to portray it
as an actual wrong and that's some things that it
should have been disciplinary when it wasn't. Is this where
(45:46):
we're leaving this? Are we going to be?
Speaker 4 (45:50):
I have none knows on it. Did I lose you?
Speaker 1 (46:00):
No?
Speaker 4 (46:01):
Okay, I'm ready to move on a few or a
couple of minutes left.
Speaker 1 (46:08):
I just think, I I I just want to say
one more thing. It's not that I think, oh, he
should have just done that. I think that the way
that it's people are trying to portray it as that
it there. There have been entirely false articles written by
people on the right, and I think it's misinforming a
lot of people about it so that they're very vitriolic
(46:30):
on it. That it was actually something that he skirted
because of his political stature, because of his ranking, that
he skirted some sort of rule and that they he
allowed for his you know that he put his oh
(46:52):
what am I? What am I? The word that is
escaping me, like used his clout to avoid a punishment
that any other regul Joe would have gotten, and that
is false. You can argue about if you think that
he should have, could have, would have, and that is
fair to say. I think that that's not okay. I
(47:13):
would have stayed, I would have this, but within the rules.
He still operated within the rules. He had a lot
of people do.
Speaker 4 (47:23):
He had to have called in a favor from somewhere
because he was in a stop loss as soon as
the warning went out, and they still let him go.
That's all I'm saying.
Speaker 1 (47:32):
That's not the official documentation that I read, that was
written up, that was put even in National Review the
other day. His paperwork had put in before he already
put his He already put his paperwork in before that happened. Now,
if there's the case that they backdated his his paperwork,
(47:53):
that's a deal. That's for sure a deal.
Speaker 4 (47:56):
But the only point that I was trying to make
is in the circles of being enlisted, that man was
technically a god.
Speaker 1 (48:08):
Apparently not, because the right is coming out and saying
that all of these people hated him, His superiors didn't
like him, all of them think he sucked, and that
he was a worm. So which is it I'm talking
with It good for him to be gone? Or was
it not.
Speaker 4 (48:23):
Talking about the general rank of command sergeant major. There
were literally seven others at the time in the entire
National Guard.
Speaker 1 (48:32):
That's okay that you said they all look to him
as a god. I'm saying, is that really true though,
because they're.
Speaker 4 (48:38):
Saying that I'm en listed look at a CSM as
if they are God. Because it's almost impossible to attain
that rank. So therefore what so therefore him doing what
he therefore.
Speaker 1 (48:55):
You can't retire, So therefore you can't retire.
Speaker 4 (48:59):
No other the command sergeant major would have done it.
I know people that have gotten divorced rather.
Speaker 1 (49:05):
Than not the I mean, which I find pretty.
Speaker 4 (49:11):
I didn't say I agree that the rule.
Speaker 1 (49:12):
By the way, because it goes God spouse. But no,
and I agree I agree with Calvin. The lies are
an issue, or the allowing people to think something without
correcting them is certainly an issue, and certainly what should
be held to account. And if it comes out that
(49:33):
there was paperwork that was backdated, that there were other
things like that, But as far as like what the
extensive report in the date show, it shows that there
hadn't been caused rumors is not the same as they're
actually being orders in place yet. And I get that
y'all feel like, Okay, Well, but even if he thought
(49:55):
there was a chance, or if he knew that it
was coming down, but it wasn't coming down for a
couple of months, and he still did this anyway, So
that's wrong. Well, feel that that's wrong, but it's not.
I think it's false. Well, I don't think it is
false to claim that it was in some sort of
done carried out in some sort of illegal capacity. There's
(50:17):
so many other things to hit him on, including that
he let people lie, including that he didn't correct people,
or that he lied, that he let people lie for him,
that he didn't correct them on things. These are all
very provable, easily you know, pointed out things. There's stuff
on record, like you said in Congress, there's video of
(50:37):
him just smiling and nodding along. These are all things
to hit him on, and I just haven't. I haven't been.
I've I just think that it's gotten a little bit
carried away with I get why people, the normies are
going to see it as an attack on his service
when the attack isn't on his service. It's on these
very specific things. But when you go back to the
(51:00):
whole deployment issue, they think that's exactly what it is.
They should never claim to be a combat bed. He
should never claim to be a CSM at retirement. He's
allowed those lives to perpetuate, and that's what he should
be held to account to for sure.
Speaker 4 (51:18):
No, I agree, that's pretty much what I was trying
to say. Wait, we got like five minutes left. Where
else you want to go?
Speaker 1 (51:30):
Rex said, I've known a couple of CSMs who were garbage. Well,
no one said that they're all great, No one in
any power position of power, actually is. I mean there's
I mean there's always there's always crap ones everywhere you go,
no matter what. So the last thing I really did
(51:52):
want to say real quick that was weird today that
came out today was after everything happened with the assassination,
after all the failures of the Secret Service, right mm hm,
we still have a serious utter failure supposedly that happened yesterday.
(52:15):
Well you'll see why in a second, because oh, okay, yeah,
the woman's Secret Service agent.
Speaker 4 (52:21):
Yes, I knew where you were going as soon as
before you even said to utter, and then I was like, oh,
that's good.
Speaker 1 (52:29):
If anybody didn't know, unused utter. So anyone that doesn't know,
they this a woman's Secret Service special agent. So at uh.
When Trump visited North Carolina yesterday, she abandoned her post
a breastfeed with no permission or warning to the events
side agent, according to three sources and the sucret Service.
(52:51):
And it gets even weirder because it's not just like, okay,
well she wasn't there at her post. It was that
they then went to sweep the final route that he
was going to be taking, and she was found in
a room breastfeeding her actual child, not pumping, like breastfeeding
(53:12):
her child with family members in the room that had
not been like approved, They'd not been given had not
been given any badges or anything like. So they went
past like the security checkpoint, the Secret Service approved security checkpoint,
like what is happening here? Like just after the assassination
(53:37):
attempt on Trump in which an innocent person was killed,
this Secret Service agent decides that it's okay to have
her family members travel with her infant, who apparently she's
based out of Atlanta. So they had traveled to North
Carolina with her to bring her on site just before
(53:58):
a former president then appears, in which she is entrusted
with his security and decides it's okay to take a
break in a room and have her unauthorized family members
come in, bring her baby and physically breastfeed the baby.
What the fuck is going on?
Speaker 4 (54:19):
I don't know, but that's so that's the weirdest story
of the day regarding Secret Service, but it's not the
worst one. So you remember when everything started breaking right
and they were trying to figure out why it was
that nobody could communicate with each other and nobody had
any fucking clue what was going on. Guess what? We
just found out that Secretary Majorcis is the one that
(54:40):
determines what is considered a I don't remember the exact
word they use, but what is considered I guess a
critical posting, and rallies didn't qualify, So they didn't even
have the resources to do the central command posts that
everybody was saying that they should have been using. They
didn't have one because rallies were aren't allowed to have
them under their current designation. So this is my question
(55:04):
because I can kind of see it for most rallies
like the Little One Advance. Did you know where there
was like maybe one hundred hundred fty people the other
day that the left like, look, oh look their campaigns imploating.
I'm like, have you seen the sides of the space.
You probably couldn't have done much in there anyway. But
for rallies outdoors that can hold thousands of people, you're
(55:25):
telling me that somebody in a cabinet level position decided
that they don't need a secret service uniformed command post.
The only person that can make that decision is my orcists.
So what makes it even more interesting to me is
you're telling me that you didn't bump this up to
(55:46):
a critical position in an open air rally with an
active threat against a former president. Tell me again, the
Biden administration doesn't want Trump dead.
Speaker 1 (55:57):
I know. I'm just telling you that, Oh, this just
does not surprise me at all. After my experience. They
have been lack a day's ago af for I probably decades.
I don't know what they've been doing the last fucking
fifteen years or more, but it just seems like, I
mean again that even after some monumental situation, this woman
(56:20):
still thought it was okay to go do This tells
you that there's a very serious problem with being unseerious
in the Secret Service.
Speaker 4 (56:30):
I mean, well, I think it's I think it's kind
of everywhere right now, if I'm being honest, they're just
like an unseerious approach to pretty much everything anymore, as
or is any type of service. It kind of goes
back to what we were just talking about a second ago.
And again, it's not that we don't think twenty four
years of service was impressive. It's the fact that apparently
he didn't because he chose to not only allow other
(56:51):
people to lie about it, but then assume the lie
himself and didn't correct anybody.
Speaker 1 (56:55):
But and I don't think that it's even necessarily super impressive.
I think it's actually, for what it was, rather unimpressive
and great for someone to do, but not necessarily all
that impressive in and of itself. But when yeah, I
(57:20):
think when you kind of take the nonchalant approach to everything,
then stuffed snowballs and you end up with a presidential
candidate getting shot at.
Speaker 4 (57:30):
So they have Secret Service has decided that Trump can
start doing open air rallies again. But they're going to
start giving him the same resource they give the sitting presidents,
and his entire podium will be surrounded by bulletproof glass. Now,
probably should have been doing that from the beginning, two assholes.
Speaker 1 (57:49):
But what's weird is that it's just going to look like,
you know what it's going to look like to all
of us. If COVID had never happened, it wouldn't. But
because of COVID, it's going to look like to all
of us, like it's COVID that you Yeah, he's got
a COVID barrier.
Speaker 4 (58:03):
Oh, speaking of COVID, did you hear that the new
COVID has been selected monkey pox?
Speaker 1 (58:10):
Oh again?
Speaker 4 (58:11):
Yeah, well now they call it impos because I guess
monkey pox.
Speaker 1 (58:14):
Was say monkey, that's okay. Almost everybody that was at
the Paris Olympics was had COVID.
Speaker 4 (58:20):
So so yeah, I'm waiting for the you know, lockdown
orders to start a month from now so they can
will say.
Speaker 1 (58:28):
I will say that the Olympic committee in Paris, in general,
I do think did the right thing and they treated
it like they treated anything else and let the athletes
choose for themselves how well they feel and what they
should do. So we had a we had a lot
of our athletes, but a lot of others that competed
with COVID. I mean our guy uh Noah, like he
(58:49):
he got bronze in the two hundred meter because he
since his win in the hundred and then going to
the to the two hundred, he uh got diagnosed with
COVID it and he has severe asthma and he was
having a really hard time, but he thought that he
could power through. And I mean, wouldn't you love to
just power through a fucking illness and get a bronze medal?
(59:12):
Oh you know, just.
Speaker 4 (59:13):
Powering through, just powering through. COVID got the bronze, no being.
Speaker 1 (59:17):
No big yell, had to be carted off by medical
but still.
Speaker 4 (59:21):
Now, granted I didn't really watch any of the Olympics
because I was working on everything else. But I have
a serious question, when the hell did break dancing become
an Olympic sport? And why did they let it? Why
did they let an epileptic enter?
Speaker 1 (59:34):
That is insanity?
Speaker 5 (59:37):
What was that?
Speaker 1 (59:38):
That whole thing is insanity. So the weird thing is
is that normally when the when Olympics approve a sport,
there has to be some sort of like international body
that it regulates the sport in some way, and they
don't always have to be like super legit or long
held or whatever, but there has to be different federations
(59:58):
for the countries and then like an overall governing body.
And that is not the case with breakdancing, and it's
not the case with every single sport but a lot
of them. But that way they can kind of have
an even kill and fair thing. And so they basically
just left it up to the countries who had to
(01:00:19):
have a federation. But this woman and her husband in Australia,
she's got her PhD in whatever breakdancing history and culture
or whatnot. They formed the federation and they held the
trials and they he is like head of the committee
and she was a part of the trial, so he
(01:00:40):
selected her. It's really that simple. Wow, Oh, it's so
fucking corrupt. They basically they completely defrauded the Australian government
into getting a basically a vacation to Paris. And there
have now been videos that surfaced of some of the
(01:01:01):
other women that tried to compete to be the representative
for Australia and they are far better and so it
just so happens that her and her husband like form
the federation, form the committee, a panel of judges, and
then he's the head of that, and then she's the
one selected, even though she admits that she hardly ever
practices break dancing and that what she does is more
(01:01:23):
artistic and not actual breaking or b boying or whatever
you want to call it. So I don't know, it
was just like I think it was. Our breakdancing can
be incredibly athletic, mostly amongst the men, but I think
it's too artistic too. You would have to you would
(01:01:44):
have to really form a score pattern to be able
to then go, okay, they hit this, okay they like
they do with gymnastics, right, Like, there would have to
be an artistic score that they could do whatever on,
and then there'd have to be like a skill score
and they have to hit certain compole thtory skills, other
skills at point and I just don't think they had
vetted all that out and done well enough with all
(01:02:06):
of that. I will say that that woman was awarded
zero points for bunny hop and seizing on the floor,
awarded her zero points. But what a slap in the
face to all the people.
Speaker 5 (01:02:20):
That like.
Speaker 4 (01:02:22):
What surprised they couldn't give negatives?
Speaker 1 (01:02:24):
I know, but think about it, like what a slap
in the face that is to like all the people
that legitimate, legitimately work and have you know, cultivated their
skills for so many years. And she's like, I studied it.
I'm a PhD, and I think I should be the
one to go because I know more about it, Like what,
(01:02:45):
it's so weird and you're white, And part of her,
like PhD, is in the history of it being like
from Native Africans, like what bro what more insulting can
you get to the overall break dancing community? But I
think they I think they I think they jump the
(01:03:07):
gun on putting it in. I think they'd need a
more kind of international like and scoes, like more of
an international presence of some sort of like international competitions
for everybody to kind of go to every year, just
like they do the Worlds or the Euros or the
whatever in almost every other sport. And then they need
to set up a really definitive scoring system and so
(01:03:28):
they just they haven't done that. And it's it's still dance,
so it's still artistic. But the boys do a lot
of crazy athletic crap, so it could be really entertaining
as a sport if there were some better parameters set up.
But have no fear. It has been kicked out of LA.
It did not get picked up for LA. It is
not in for twenty twenty eight, so we will not
(01:03:50):
see that again.
Speaker 4 (01:03:51):
Well hopefully there's no weird like last supper bullshit that
happens in LA too, but it is LA, so who knows?
Speaker 1 (01:03:57):
Who knows?
Speaker 4 (01:04:00):
But yeah, so uh one more quick hit only because
I feel like we have to bring this up. Have
you seen all of the weirdness going on with Anna
Pauline a Luna?
Speaker 1 (01:04:11):
No?
Speaker 4 (01:04:12):
So apparently somebody dug up a video and a bunch
of pictures of her prants and around in a maga
bikini and now the left is like completely pissed off.
No yeah, so yeah, if you haven't yet, my good
friend Cal wrote an article about that today on Twitch.
You should go check it out, especially if you're a dude.
(01:04:33):
The videos in there you're gonna want to turn down
so your spouse doesn't know, and then just keep clicking.
Trust me, you'll take me later. But yeah, so anyway,
so the the only reason I brought it up is
because I've started seeing people and this is people from
the right, and one of them just I literally just
started chuckling because she's like, I'm a Trump supporter and
(01:04:56):
I'm a Christian and this is a bad look for us.
And her first fucking name with Karen, I'm not even
kidding wow, And I'm like, oh.
Speaker 1 (01:05:05):
She's to go look at this. I haven't caught up
on twitchy today, so I need to do that.
Speaker 4 (01:05:12):
She's like, Yeah, she's living up to her name because
her name's Karen.
Speaker 1 (01:05:18):
Karen. I love. I love how true that often is.
Speaker 4 (01:05:23):
Yeah, well, I mean that's like, you know, I know,
it's a little bit before you. But that's why for
for my generation, it was Heathers because almost every Heather
we knew was a bitch. So there's reasons. I'm just
being honest.
Speaker 1 (01:05:37):
There are reasons, all right.
Speaker 4 (01:05:42):
Anyway, I think we have just about run the game,
but on everything, unless you've got any other quick hits.
On the way out the door.
Speaker 1 (01:05:48):
Said it was a damn good look to me. I
gotta go look at it again. Oh No, I think
I think that's about it. Cammy Kamala breastfeeding secret Service
all the BS media loving it. So so glad that
(01:06:09):
so glad that Trump sat down with Elon, though I
will we didn't spend too much time on that, but
I know it's probably been talked to death the last week.
But that that was That was good. That was a
good choice, dude.
Speaker 4 (01:06:22):
I was pleasantly surprised. I'm not even gonna lie because
I expect I expected it to be a lot less
coffee table. And it kind of reminds me of the
interviews that we do because when because we're just like, dude,
just come in and talk and I don't know, I
don't know very many other people to do that. So
and it was it was nice. And the funny thing
is just watching the left have a total meltdown about
(01:06:45):
it and then you see all these news stories, the
the the Great X debut that nobody paid attention to it.
I'm like, you realized it had a billion impressions by
the next day, right, Yeah, The whole nobody was paying
attention to a thing kind of doesn't work anymore. We
can see the numbers. That is one thing. That is
one thing that I do really really like about Elon.
I may have issues with him because he tries to
(01:07:07):
portray himself as like the king of free speech, and
really his platform is almost as broken as it was
before in some respects. But the fact that anybody can
fire something up, I mean, that's like, right now, you
and I have over two hundred some people watching us
on this platform alone, and we're on like six seven others. So,
I mean, technology is an amazing thing. But it's just
(01:07:30):
interesting to me because I was looking for something and
I lost it. Sorry train of thought, but yeah, no,
it's just it's just been It's just been funny to
me watching them follow all over themselves and try to
make this thing into this not big deal. And the
funny thing is Elon put out demographics like two days later,
(01:07:51):
and like forty percent of the people that were watching
were in the eighteen to thirty four demographics. I don't know.
I don't know if it helped or hurt, but that
means that there were a lot of people within the
age bracket that they keep saying that we can't reach,
that we're paying attention to what was being said. And
one of the best comments that I heard of the
(01:08:12):
entire thing was through cynic is published and he's like,
I feel like I just went to dinner with Thomas
Edison and Teddy Rosevelt.
Speaker 1 (01:08:21):
Yeah, I saw that. Well, I was going to say,
you know, earlier, I said, like you just even when
people seem motivated that are in that demographic, they often
or not, they still don't make it over all that
kind of thing. But you know how there's that whole
thing about how it but how it takes how long
it takes to leave an abusive relationship, and usually it
takes women like seven times to leave. Yeah, so they
(01:08:44):
have to fail like five to six times before they
finally succeed in leaving on that seventh and hopefully it's
not in the body bag. But I feel like from
people that even I just knew, and then when you
look at like the actual numbers and how people vote,
when they start voting, how it becomes clear. I feel
(01:09:04):
like it's very similar, Like you keep planning the seeds
because they kind of get excited, but then they don't
really pull the trigger. And then they get excited and
then and they kind of want to be all in
the cool with their friends, like yeah, we support so
and so or whatever, and then they finally after like
the fourth or fifth cycle and I'm not just saying
like I'm not even just saying presidential, because that's every
(01:09:25):
four years. People vote before they're sixty. But you know,
it takes a few key senatorial races. It takes a
few key presidential races. It takes a few things happening
in there, like in their you know, in their town,
like in their city, some kind of big ban happening,
(01:09:45):
or you know, a proposal of some sort, and it
takes five or six things to get them really interested
over the course of a few years before they finally
start making the effort and making the time to go
actually vote on a regular basis. And that's what you're
saying with something like a trumpy lum thing, like you're
another planting of that seed. Even when Rogan does stuff
(01:10:09):
or whatever, it's just it's Bill Maher. You get a
few more people that are like, oh, okay, that kind
of appeals to me. Oh I'm listening, and you're just
you're just kind of building on that bit by bit.
Speaker 4 (01:10:25):
Yeah, no, And I get it. I mean that's like
everything that's going on with the African American community right now,
there are so many people that would have never even
considered voting for him, and now they're just like, you
know what, I don't really feel like I have any
other option because everybody that tells me, everybody that says
they're going to help me have a better life every
election cycle, doesn't do anything but look out for themselves.
(01:10:47):
But that's honestly. Another thing that's been driving me absolutely
nuts about this election cycle is everybody, and I mean
everybody is treating it as if we have two unknown
quantities running for office. We don't all these people. Trump
needs to out Line's policies. We've seen Trump's policies and
they work. She needs that out line or policies. We've
seen her policies and they suck. Her policy. Her policies
(01:11:11):
are Biden's policies. She's been going around the country for months.
This is Bidenomics, and we love bid nomics. And did
I mention how much I love.
Speaker 1 (01:11:21):
I do find it hilarious though, and I think it's it's,
you know, kind of a silly thing to hit, but like,
I do find it hilarious though that she's this, you
know this many weeks then and there's still not an
actual like platform on her website, Like.
Speaker 4 (01:11:36):
What, Yeah, she's been doing this for like a month
and has nothing on our website yet. And I mean
everything everything she's come up with has been partied from
elsewhere like that she had, like, like I said earlier,
she had one of her staffers basically called the media
fake news, just more politely. She's she's no tax on tips,
(01:11:57):
and Trump's like, wait a minute, she's He's like, what next,
You're gonna steal the no tax on social Security thing too.
And now everything she's coming out with that she's talked
about today is like straight out of the fucking communist playbook. Oh,
I know, I'm gonna help people get houses by giving
them a twenty five thousand dollars credit. Thank you for
just telling everybody that can raise the price on the
house by twenty five thousand dollars.
Speaker 1 (01:12:17):
History? What is it?
Speaker 4 (01:12:19):
Yeah? What is this? What is this history thing?
Speaker 1 (01:12:22):
Sorry, I'll be.
Speaker 4 (01:12:23):
Really I'll be really curious tomorrow if she actually does
say that she wants to basically because she's gonna she's
gonna sell it as price gouging because that's what Biden's
been telling everybody that the corporations are doing well, and that's.
Speaker 1 (01:12:38):
What and also that's what like normal people here and go, yeah, no,
that's wrong and they shouldn't be allowed to do that.
And so of course that makes sense. You know, they're idiots,
but they're not that big of idiots. They know how
they're doing, they know what they're doing when they say
that stuff.
Speaker 4 (01:12:55):
No, I mean yeah, I mean, and that's the thing.
Kamala might be a moron, but the people running her team.
Speaker 1 (01:12:59):
Aer yeah, And I mean I even think that a
little bit, like she's not in certain ways just where
you're like, you know the same thing about anybody. You're like,
oh my gosh, why is Trump being such an idiot
about this? But like he's not a dumbass, you know,
Likes these words have a little bit different meaning and
which way that we are in what way we categorize
(01:13:23):
them at a certain time, Like don't be an idiot,
but you're not an idiot, but like you're being an idiot,
you know.
Speaker 4 (01:13:31):
Yeah, it's like, don't be a dumbass, dumbass, I mean,
you know, it doesn't actually mean you're a dumbass, but
you're behaving like one. But the one final thought that
I do want to push out real quick, and then
we do have to go because I just remembered I
have to take somebody to do. So here's my thing,
and this is going out to anybody that is on
this feed right now or may hear this later. If
(01:13:52):
you are still on the fence regarding Donald Trump, all
I'm going to say to you is if we, as
people that call ourselves conservatives, cannot come together to give
communists free helicopter rides, with free skydiving lessons parachute optional,
then I don't know what we can come together for.
Because these people are seriously starting to roll out communist
(01:14:14):
agenda right in front of us, and we still have
people that are supposed to be on our side of
the aisle. The same party that ended slavery, the same
party that destroyed communism in the USSR, is now like, well,
we can't vote for the orange guy because he's mean.
If we can't agree to come together long enough to
(01:14:35):
eat commies, what the fuck good is the party for anymore?
Speaker 1 (01:14:38):
I will say that I'm with I don't know who
said this recently. I'm sure there's been lots of people
that have, but I am with all of them that
I'm really ready to have a presidential election that's not
so dire and going to be the end of America
if you don't vote this way, because it feels like
(01:14:59):
every thing's been like that for like thirty years, every
single one.
Speaker 4 (01:15:04):
Yeah, the problem with that is the reason they've been
saying that for thirty years is to desensitize you to
the fact that they now have us really close and
they're hoping you're not going.
Speaker 1 (01:15:14):
I'm just saying, it's every single fucking one, so everybody
always has to buy the bullet or you know, whatever
they got to do, because every single one is the
one that's gonna end it all. And I'm just ready
to have a normal one at some point. I would
love that. That'd be great.
Speaker 4 (01:15:28):
No, I get it, But I'm just saying, there's a
reason they started doing that. It was to desensitize everybody
to that.
Speaker 1 (01:15:35):
Well, I mean, we did it too. The right did
it too. If you do this, they are always gonna
do that. And they're I mean way back before Glenn.
Speaker 4 (01:15:41):
And I said they I meant both sides.
Speaker 1 (01:15:44):
Okay, just like it's been, it's been everybody. It's like, oh,
good grief, it's such a headache just your mind.
Speaker 4 (01:15:52):
Both both parts of the establishment parties want the same things.
They just want us getting there at different times. That's
why they've been doing a lot of the things that
they've been doing, some of them for over one hundred
years to get us to this point, like the Progressive
Income text just saying all right, anyway, where where can
find you?
Speaker 1 (01:16:12):
One last thing? Real quick? I do think that the
whole no tax on tips is the first step to abolishing.
Speaker 4 (01:16:18):
The I R S exactly, which is why.
Speaker 1 (01:16:21):
Because it's be unsustainable. Uh you know x Jay Holmstead
mississ Politics, which tomorrow night, of course, is misfit mischief,
and I want to say real quick, so Rex has
been really helping take the lead on that this summer
while I've been busy. But also really funny that we
(01:16:41):
got called out last week for engagement farming and everybody
jumped on and was like, you knew here because we
were doing misfit mischief before you cook quote tea, before
you could you had to manually retweet when we first
did mischief mischief. I don't know if that's exactly, but
it was a long time. It was before quote tweets,
(01:17:02):
So it's like, yeah, no, that's not what this is about.
And if it was, we'd be we'd be trying to
monetize it, but it's not the deal. It's just for fun.
But I thought that was hilarious that I was waiting.
I've been waiting ever since the whole engagement farming thing
has come up. I've been waiting for someone to accuse
misfits of that, and uh, well it finally happened. But no,
(01:17:23):
we're not engagement farming guys. We just want to have
fun with our friends. So y'all come join, Grab a drink,
pull up a chair, eat a hot dog, I don't know,
whatever you want to do, and bring your memes and
your gifts because we're gonna have a good time.
Speaker 4 (01:17:38):
So quick question, because I haven't paid attention in a while,
does miss Fit's account have a blue check?
Speaker 1 (01:17:44):
We do not?
Speaker 4 (01:17:45):
Okay, so the next time somebody brings up engagement farming,
let them know.
Speaker 1 (01:17:49):
Yeah no, quite a quite a few did. They were like, uh,
bro like, not even a blue check, okay.
Speaker 4 (01:17:55):
Can't can't can't engagement farm if there's no check. Yeah,
can't get a check without a check, bro on.
Speaker 1 (01:18:02):
How it works exactly. Anyways, that was just hilarious.
Speaker 4 (01:18:06):
Oh I actually saw that the other night. And then
I'm meant to bring it up earlier and I forgot.
But anyway, y'all know where to find me by now,
but just in case you don't, I'll be here tomorrow
morning sort of. Now we've had to move the show,
so it's now what are we doing now? I guess
it's one to three Eastern, so I guess it's not
morning quite yet. But so that's Rick robinson Show's new time,
(01:18:28):
new one to three Eastern starting in September, may go
to twelve to three because I keep running out of time,
and then I'll be back Tomorrow night and doing he said,
She said with Aggie Reekin. So that means Tomorrow night
is a two device night if you can hack it.
So make sure you're hanging out with me and Aggie
and having fun with the Misfits, and I'll be back
Saturday night doing Juxtaposition with the Ordinance j Packard at
(01:18:48):
ten pm Eastern. You can also find me as a
contributor on Twitch dot com, occasionally on Misfits Politics dot com,
as well as loftus Party dot com, and I do
the Loftist Party podcast, which drops every Tuesday, usually before
about nine Eastern. And there's more but I'm not going
into all of it because you guys should know most
of this by now, and if you don't, just follow
(01:19:08):
me on x app already ex. Seventy three. It's where
I spend most of my time. Anyway. Bye, everybody, have
a great night, Thanks for hanging out. Say good night, Gracie.
(01:19:31):
The preceding program was recorded through KLR and Radio LLC.
All intellectual property rights are held through its parent company,
Double R Solutions LLC. All rights reserved copyright twenty twenty five.