All Episodes

November 14, 2025 198 mins
In this stream I discuss read an article posted on Orthodox Ethos by G.M. Davis critiquing the book Antisemitism: History and Myth by Robert Spencer. Make sure to leave a comment and let me know what you think. God Bless Read the article Here: https://www.orthodoxethos.com/post/is-god-an-antisemite 🔥 Join the Logos Academy! An educational community for men interested in theology, philosophy, and traditional masculinity. 👉 https://www.skool.com/logosacademy 🔥 Order now: Return to Babylon: From Adam to Antichrist ✍️ Signed Copies: https://davidpatrickharry.com/shop/return-to-babylon-from-adam-to-antichrist/ 📚 Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FRY1Z5L6 Superchat Here https://streamlabs.com/churchoftheeternallogos Donochat Me: https://dono.chat/dono/dph Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCH8JwgaHCkhdfERVkGbLl2g/join Buy ALP Nicotine Pouches Here!: https://alnk.to/6IHoDGl PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/eternallogos Website: http://www.davidpatrickharry.com Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dpharry/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/_dpharry

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-logos-podcast--4760780/support.
Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:16):
All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.

Speaker 2 (00:19):
This is doctor Patrick Carey with Church of the Eternal Logos,
and today we're gonna be asking is God.

Speaker 1 (00:26):
An anti Semite?

Speaker 2 (00:27):
In today's stream, we're actually gonna be reviewing an article
overall on the website Orthodox Ethos shout out to Father
Peter here is written by the author GM Davis.

Speaker 1 (00:38):
He's a PhD. Has a book on Antichrist.

Speaker 2 (00:41):
Or globalism, Globalism and Antichrist. I'm blanking on the exact
title of that book. Some of you guys have probably
already read it. It's a book that I actually cited.
It's a it's a quality book published by Uncut Mountain Press. Well,
for those of you who don't know, there's a gentleman
named Robert Spencer. And no, we're not talking about Richard Spencer.

(01:04):
If immediately your mind moved to Richard Spencer, that is
not who we're talking about. Hey, something's going on with
it today's stream, guys. I cannot set a goal for
today's stream. I'm curious it's showing for me, is it's monetized,
But other people in the chat are telling me that.

Speaker 1 (01:26):
There's no share button.

Speaker 2 (01:28):
Is there no share button for a lot of you
guys watching on YouTube. Yes, Robert Spencer's the Islam guy.
I'll explain here in just a minute.

Speaker 1 (01:37):
But are you guys having problems on YouTube?

Speaker 2 (01:41):
Like I don't know if you saw my comment in
the live chat before we went live. Usually I'm able
to set a YouTube superchat goal. Not working today I
don't It could be a YouTube glitch, could be Yeah,
it could be the title of the stream already got flagged.

Speaker 1 (01:56):
It's it's a possibility.

Speaker 2 (01:59):
But let me know if you guys start having weird glitches.
We're you know, much of our conversation, just like on
our last stream asking what is a Jew? We're gonna
we're gonna stay pretty theological to avoid some of the
problematic areas and tos and content creation. So anyways, Yes,

(02:20):
the point of today's stream is there is a book
written by a gentleman named Robert Spencer. This is not
to be confused with Richard Spencer, often described as the
the white supremacist or wing Nat Richard Spencer. No, Robert
Spencer is actually of Greek ethnicity. He has now returned

(02:42):
back to the Greek Orthodox Church, but he is the
gentleman behind Jihad Watch. He's the anti Islamic gentleman, and
some of the stuff he said about Islam and being,
you know, in regards to it being a threat, an
existential threat to the West, it's hard to find a
disagreement with that. So no, you know, no disagreement with

(03:07):
his polemics regarding Islam. However, interestingly enough, he just wrote
a book called Anti Semitism, History and Myth. It was
published this year, in twenty twenty five, and pretty interesting.
I was spending time today trying to go through and
look at what exactly his arguments are, and essentially from.

Speaker 1 (03:31):
What I found, I do not have the book.

Speaker 2 (03:33):
I will admit we're going to be reading GM Davis's response.
And this is why the stream is titled is God
an Anti Semite? Because Robert Spencer, a gentleman who claims
to now be Orthodox. He converted to like the Melkite
Church Catholic Church, and I guess recently left the Roman

(03:56):
Catholic Church for the Greek Orthodox Church. That's what we're told.
That's according to his Wikipedia online. In fact, let me
just pull that up real quick so we all know
who we're talking about here. So this is Robert Spencer.
You guys may have seen him before. Again, he's famous
for his anti Islamic polemics Jihad Watch, the stop the

(04:19):
Islamization of America, all of which quite supportive of as
you can see here. He was baptized Greek Orthodox, joined
the Melkite Greek Catholic Church in nineteen eighty four, and
then just recently in twenty sixteen, left the Roman Catholic
Church because his views on Islam, because Catholicism is soft

(04:41):
on Islam. So for that reason he'd left that church
and then joined, rejoined, returned to the Greek Orthodox Church. However,
it appears he's never been catechized properly because he's a
massive Zionist. And in his book he actually argues that
anti s Smotism, though he never defines it. He next

(05:03):
he never actually presents a sort of universal definition, an
operating definition to be used for his response or you know,
anti Semitism history and myth and this it is a
response against what he deems as rising anti Semitism. And
we're going to watch some videos here to actually open

(05:23):
up rising anti.

Speaker 1 (05:25):
Semitism is is occurring.

Speaker 2 (05:28):
And obviously we're going to watch a very recent clip
right here where he references Taylor or Tucker Carlson, nickquintask
so you know, much more recent Candice Owens the people
that have getten criticized quite frequently right now. So it

(05:49):
turns out this book is basically a massive critique of
Christianity in defensive of what he deems is the problem
of anti Semitism, and so anti semits he claims, is
this evil that has been plaguing history.

Speaker 1 (06:04):
And what are his claims.

Speaker 2 (06:06):
That are the anti Semitic origins, at least regarding the
Christian tradition, Well, the idea that the Church is Israel,
the most foundational theology of the Church, that the Church
is the continuation of the Old Testament of the First Covenant,
and we now are in the Second Covenant, and that
we are the continuation of Israel. So he deems that

(06:28):
anti semitic. He deems the idea that Jews killed God,
or Jews killed Christ, or that the Pharisees and the
Jewish Elite were the main culprits behind Pontius Pilot's crucifixion
of Christ. He deems that also one of the problems

(06:50):
with Christianity is it being anti Semitic.

Speaker 1 (06:55):
And then he also.

Speaker 2 (06:57):
Teaches at least he mentions in the book Xantium comes
up and talks about He kind of discusses the imperial
ecclesiolastical laws that restricted and we talked about this in
the last stream on what is a Jew? That restricted
synagogue construction forbade Jews from holding any public office that
wielded political power over Christians and then encourage them to convert.

(07:21):
So the things that we actually mentioned in our last
video what is a Jew? That the Byzantine Empire did
put pressure on the Jewish communities to convert to Christianity,
and there was basically an expectation amongst all Christians at
that point that, of course, why wouldn't you convert to
Christianity because the Old Covenant has already been fulfilled. It's

(07:45):
like what we do in here, shout out to MGM Studies.
He throws in twenty says Jesus the original selving Jew. Yeah,
funny enough, funny enough. So anyways, what GM Davis does
in the article that we're going to be reading today

(08:05):
is God an anti semi is basically presents Robert Spencer's
argument and demonstrates not only how it's anti Christian, but
it would insinuate that aspects of Christianity itself or or
what God actually instituted as the Church, is itself anti semitic,
asking the question is God an anti semi because the

(08:29):
definition that Robert Spencer uses is so general anybody, anybody
and anything, and so that's why his criticisms of Christianity
in particular, in particular, I mean, he talks about how
Christians basically theologize Jewish hate, and this is one of

(08:50):
the reasons why he believes in the Trump administration, with
the rise of nationalism and Christian identity, that we're also
witnessing a rise of anti Semitis.

Speaker 1 (09:00):
Now.

Speaker 2 (09:02):
He is very clear that at no point in history
are the Jews responsible for any of the criticisms, any
of the rebukings, any of the skepticism around some of
their activities in community. I mean, he mentions, he talks
about Filo Alexandra. We're gonna watch this little clip video here.

(09:24):
He mentions Filo of Alexandria a Jew by the way, right,
this is a Jewish man, a Hellenistic Jew during the
first century. Never mentions that Filo is a Jew, and
he condemns Filo of Alexandria because he mentioned that there
are some Jews that have rituals that are secret from
the public, and that some Jews are doing things that

(09:46):
are subversive to the surrounding Greek culture. Now that was
Filo of Alexandra, who himself was a Hellenistic Jew. Robert
Spencer makes it sound like this is some Christian church
father institutionalizing what he deems his anti Semitism. So we're
gonna watch this in just a second. But it's amazing
how there is a zero zero culpability. He thinks that

(10:08):
there's very little historical evidence, of course, for Christians to
blame Jews for anything. Now I bring this up as
just a quick little caveat those maybe have already seen
and Al Goldstein, you know, is it Mega was an
American pornographer, best known for publishing the sex newspaper Screw
in the United States. He has a pretty interesting little

(10:30):
comment on religion.

Speaker 1 (10:33):
Now. He identified as an atheist Jew, but.

Speaker 2 (10:38):
During an interview Luke Ford wrote about a conversation with
Goldstein in which Ford asked Goldstein why Jews are dramatically
overrepresented in the porn industry. He answered, the only reason
that Jews are in pornography, is that we think christ sucks,
Catholicism sucks, we don't believe in authoritarian pornography. Thus becomes

(11:02):
a way of defiling Christian culture, and as it penetrates
to the very heart of the American mainstream and is,
no doubt consumed by those very wasps, it's subversive character
becomes more charged. Ford than ask what does it mean
to you to be a Jew, to which Goldstein responded,
it doesn't mean anything. It means that I'm called a

(11:24):
K word I'm not going to repeat on YouTube. Ford
also asked do you believe in God? Goldstein said, I
believe in me. I'm God. Screw God, God? Is your
need to believe in some super being? I am the
super being. I am your God.

Speaker 1 (11:38):
Admit it.

Speaker 2 (11:39):
We're random, We're the flea on the butt of a dog.
Now that is just one specific case. But Spencer tries
to make the case or make the claim that any
argument about Jews related to finance or different aspects of
European history where they engaged in certain enterprises, that these

(12:02):
are just total conspiratorial confection that has no basis in reality.
So very interesting. So, with all that being said, I
want to actually show you and allow Robert Spencer to
present his own words, and then we're going to get
into and read this entire article of GM Davis. Again,

(12:23):
this is over on Orthodox Ethos dot com, so everybody's
interested in it. Here's the link right here, so if
you guys want to go grab that, grab the link there.

Speaker 1 (12:35):
It is.

Speaker 2 (12:37):
Also just want to mention to everybody before we watch
these clips if we want to support the stream. This
is the last day before I'll be doing a road
trip with my wife for getting a rental car, going
down to Nashville for debatecon and then from there driving
down to Florida for the Athens and Jerusalem conference. So
if you'd like to support our trip, please be more

(13:00):
than happy. If you would super chat through stream labs
or dono chat.

Speaker 1 (13:05):
If you prefer to.

Speaker 2 (13:06):
Use YouTube, feel free to use YouTube. YouTube is fine
as well. And if you're feeling generous gifts, some Cotal
crew memberships would really appreciate it. VP Dah been a
Codal crew member for three months. As Robert Spencer is
a Zionist, oivey very much, very much.

Speaker 1 (13:21):
Is a Zionist. Somebody as when are you coming to Ireland.
I'd love to come to Ireland. I got some little
Irish ancestry. Never been there.

Speaker 2 (13:30):
I have been at the Dublin International Airport. I wouldn't
consider that fully being in Ireland, but you know, I
would love to go. I've had a couple of friends
go and they've said it is beautiful. They love their
time over in Ireland. Someone lives in Greenwood, Indiana. Well
that's pretty close to me, the produgal. You should go

(13:52):
to Saint Mary of Egypt Orthodox Church over at Freedom's
on one thirty five. We sold our old church and
now we or in the gymnasium of a Protestant church
while we're building on our fourteen acre property. So our
church we just bought fourteen acre property, got big plans
for the future. So as we begin to try to
build a new church. We're at a Protestant church. But

(14:14):
if you're in the Era area Prodigal thirty three, go
over to Freedom's on Sunday. Saint Mary of Egypt Orthodox
Church be happy to have you.

Speaker 1 (14:24):
Okay, all right, let's watch this early clip.

Speaker 2 (14:29):
So we're just gonna watch sections of this, and they're
all captured. He's talking with some sort of dispensationalist Christian
Zionists right now. And this first section is the rise
of anti Semitism, and he talks about October seventh, and
then he starts getting into the origins of anti Semitism,
this evil that he claims has plagued history and the Jews,
this undeserving evil of skepticism towards them and their community

(14:54):
and some of their religious practices. So we're gonna skip
through here, but I want Robert Spencer to p zent
himself that way, you know, I'm not mischaracterizing him before
read GM Davis's article. So here's the first little there's
the first little bit where he's talking about the rise
of anti Semitism in America.

Speaker 1 (15:17):
Would you find out doing the research.

Speaker 3 (15:19):
Here, Well, it goes back. A lot of people think
that it started with Christianity, and there is a strain
of Christian anti Semitism that still exists. But one of
the things that I found out was that anti Semitism
actually originated earlier than Christianity, and Christianity is the only
form of it, or the only source we could say

(15:41):
of anti Semitism that has actually repudiated it. With the
mainstream understandings of the New Testament passages that historically gave
rise to anti Semitism, mostly having been actually all of
them having been rich, the anti Semitic interpretations of them
having been rejected by leaders of all the major denominations,

(16:05):
and the mainstream understandings of these passages are no longer
used except by unfortunately a still persistent fringe. They're no
longer used in an anti Semitic manner.

Speaker 2 (16:19):
So, you know, obviously, as you guys are familiar following culture,
anti Semitism is the hottest topic to discuss if you've
been following the fallout with Shapiro and of course tel
Aviv Levin. They're constant and persistent attack on Tucker Carlson,
canz Oens and all those.

Speaker 1 (16:40):
You know.

Speaker 2 (16:40):
Obviously Flint Tests, He's kind of the brunt of much
of what they hate. But it's the surrounding sort of
traditionally more moderate conservatives that are becoming more critical of Zionism.
And it's amazing how just becoming critical of Zionism now
equates you with being an anti semit You hate people, right?

(17:02):
And is it really about hate? And even if obviously
we're Orthodox Christians, do I believe that the Jews killed Christ.

Speaker 1 (17:09):
Yes. Do I believe that the Church is the true Israel? Yes?

Speaker 2 (17:14):
Do I believe that the modern day secular, semisecular state
of Israel and the expansion of it through the Greater
Israel project in the building of the Third Temple will
bring about the Antichrist? Yes, I do personally believe that.
But I don't hate individual Jews. I don't hate Jews, right,
So how can you say that's anti Semitic?

Speaker 1 (17:35):
Right?

Speaker 2 (17:35):
That's one of the problems with Robert Spencer is that
it is so general what he defines as anti Semitism,
that anybody can be grouped in as some type of
hateful you know, Jew hater. It's like, what, we don't
hate Jews, what does that have to do with anything?
And in fact, calling people these names obviously is making

(17:56):
the problem worse, and they've lost all cultural influence. We've
talked about Ben Shapiro, I mean, he comes out today
and is now advocating for h one b Visas.

Speaker 1 (18:08):
Did you guys see this, I think on his show today.

Speaker 2 (18:12):
Ben Shapiro, after everything that's going on, after everything, you know,
and Trump's now trying to bring in, you know, all
these Chinese foreign Chinese college exchange students to get educated
in America. He's defending the H one B visas system.
You know, his one hundred thousand dollars really isn't as

(18:33):
effective as some of the people in the Trump administration
speculated it would be. And during all of this, Ben
Shapiro then comes out and talks about how his economic
political paradigm necessitates more people and therefore he's in favor
of immigration and the use of H one B visas

(18:55):
because it's going to bring the highest talent around the
world to America, but hasn't really, has it really, And
so the inability to just have authentic conversations, you know,
that's where I think Tucker Carlson, it's it's just a
great measurer for the temperature in society right now, because

(19:18):
he is not overly extreme like anybody who's on the
internet has seen real Jew hate, and the majority of
it is not in the Christian community. Obviously, half the
Protestant Christians in America or dispensationalist and quite literally worshiped Jews,
and the gentleman here on the on the left of

(19:38):
Robert Spencer, he himself is one of these people. And
I've talked about I get multiple streams on dispensationalism, the Puritans,
you know, Jewish eschatology.

Speaker 1 (19:49):
We did last stream.

Speaker 2 (19:51):
But because Protestantism has no sacraments, he very much worships
the Jews, the Jewish people, the Jewish community, the state
of Israel as like something physical of God's promise that
he can touch because again, they have this ethereal abstract
church that they're a part of. And that's why the

(20:12):
abstract church does not supersede the nation of Israel and
the Temple worship. But obviously that's what we believe is Orthodox.
So this is one of the things I was concerning
to me because we haven't even got into his criticisms
of Christianity yet Robert Spencer, and yet he's part of the.

Speaker 1 (20:29):
Greek Orthodox Church.

Speaker 2 (20:31):
Bro, how if you're in the Greek Orthodox Church, can
you publish a book telling people if they believe that
the Church is Israel it's anti Semitic? What how can
you tell people that the Jews killing Christ? And you know,
if it wasn't for the Jews, would Pontius Pilot killed Christ?
That is Pontius Pilot not say I am not guilty

(20:54):
of this man's blood. Like what I mean that doesn't
mean you hate every modern Jew, but to basically castrate
Christianity anything related to Judy. I mean this, whoa what
this is like totally against the tradition itself. So here

(21:15):
here's him talking a little bit more about it.

Speaker 4 (21:18):
Did I'm kind of figured I'd asked the question, what
was it about October seventh that was so obvious to
so many people but yet create an insurgence of rise
of anti Semitism.

Speaker 2 (21:32):
Now, remember October seventh was a date in which net
and Yahoo and the IDF was warned by Egypt, Jordan,
surrounding countries in the Middle East that there was going
to be an attack. Of course, now we know that
Israel allowed the attack to happen so that it would
be a catalyst for them to destroy Gaza, ethnically cleanse

(21:55):
the West Bank and Gaza, get the Arabs and the
Palestinians out for the Great Isabel project. And we know
that they killed a lot of their own Israeli citizens.
We know that they deliberately moved the concert so well
was right next to the border region so it'd have
easier access. And so it's amazing how with all these things,
and of course Charlie Kirk one of the things he did,

(22:17):
even before he sort of changed his tune or at
least some of his thoughts regarding Israel, according to people
close to him, he.

Speaker 1 (22:25):
Was already said, I've been to Israel multiple times.

Speaker 2 (22:27):
I know how to secure that country is there's no
way the IDF and neet Yaho didn't know that an
attack was going to happen before it happened. Everything is monitored,
everything's watched and secured. It's like, well, obviously obviously, so
here we're still going. Of course this is from April
this year. This is when his book was coming out.

(22:48):
Can't say the Dove or the Dove TV dispensational Christian
channels getting tons of views.

Speaker 1 (22:55):
They didn't get over a thousand.

Speaker 2 (22:57):
But again, it's just it's amazing to see, though, how
disconnected some of these Zionists are from, like where American
culture is, just like with Ben Shapiro talking about h
one B's during again the cultural wave that where it's like,
how disconnected are you?

Speaker 1 (23:17):
Anybody who's still divided?

Speaker 2 (23:19):
You know, defending the non release of the Epstein files
being an outward Zionist. I mean, these things are basically
sure cases that you're going to lose the support of
the younger generation, millennials and gen z. I mean, it's
just a fact that it's just a fact. That's where
we're at right now. So anyways, I'm done rambling, Perry.

Speaker 3 (23:42):
It seems to me that it was planned that there
were powerful people who knew that the October seventh attacks
were going to happen, and they were ready with a
pr campaign to portray Israel as evil, as the real aggressor,
as the supposed starter of the whole conflict.

Speaker 2 (24:04):
Notice how they flipped that, Yeah, we do know that
Israel knew ahead of time the attack. Oh you mean
that somehow all these Westerners knew to come up and
become anti Semitic after October seventh. I mean, it's such
a total denial of everything and all the atrocities that
Israel has done to the Palestinian people, and let alone

(24:26):
destroying I mean major Christian artifacts, churches, communities in the
Holy Land.

Speaker 1 (24:33):
Like what, dude, who's your allegiance with? Clearly he's getting.

Speaker 3 (24:36):
Paid, And they were ready to roll out nationwide and
worldwide protests against Israel to try to turn global public
opinion against the sole Jewish state, and obviously they've been
highly successful at that. That's one of the reasons why
I wrote the book. Because of this resurgence of anti
Semitism that we've seen around the world since October seventh.

(25:00):
I think it's clearly carefully planned, in wealth financed operation.
I don't know who exactly is behind it, but it
seems to me to be clear that they are interested
in demonizing the Jews so that they can justify another
large scale victimization of the Jewish people, such as we
saw during the Holocaust.

Speaker 1 (25:20):
All right, so let's go back. So there you have it.

Speaker 2 (25:23):
October seventh has been the catalyst not for the expansion
of Israel and every all the military activity and projects
they've engaged in. No, it's so that the Jews can
experience another Holocaust. People are wanting to put jew.

Speaker 1 (25:41):
What are you talking about?

Speaker 2 (25:44):
What I mean, you just look at domestic terrorist attacks
in America and it's all directed at mostly Christians from
trans people.

Speaker 1 (25:54):
What are you talking about, Robert?

Speaker 4 (25:57):
Robert, Before we go forward, how far back to Esusco.

Speaker 5 (26:00):
Anti Semitism goes back to the pre Christian Roman Empire
and to some writers, notably Philo of Alexandria, who was
in the first century.

Speaker 1 (26:13):
Who was a Hellenistic Jew.

Speaker 2 (26:14):
Right, So the reason why Philo of Alexandria is of
historical significance, at least for us Christians. He was a
Middle Platonist, and one of the things that he discusses
in his work is he was one of the first
people to talk about a second power in heaven being
the Logos. Right, he was a Hellenistic Jew that was
highly educated, and because of that, he was very familiar

(26:37):
with Greek philosophy, very familiar with the philosophy of logos
and that concept, and he believed that when reading the
Old Testament, the Torah, mostly he could perceive that that
word of God, the Logos, was already there. Now, he
didn't have a trinity, but he did have a sort
of by power understanding of the God in heaven.

Speaker 1 (26:59):
And talked about this. I've talked about this. There's the
boy Urn's book talks.

Speaker 2 (27:04):
About borderlines is again the multiple power in heaven theory.
But he's a Hellenistic Jew who was beginning through his
studying of Greek philosophy, seeing parallels already present in the
Old Testament, and this is why Christians then find Philo
of Alexandria of interest, because when he was a Jew. Second,

(27:28):
he was already seeing things that when we read the
Gospel of John, the Gospel of John is now fully articulating,
and Philo was already seeing these things as a Jew
ahead of time. So that's why he's of interest. But
it's also of note that Robert does not refer to
him as a Jew or a highlight that he was
actually part of the Jewish community.

Speaker 1 (27:49):
He was a Hellenistic Jew, interesting.

Speaker 3 (27:52):
A BC, and he and others made all these claims
about how the the Jews had various secret rituals that
differed from the teachings of their own scriptures, that they
were secretly working to subvert the non Jewish society, and
these things actually still spread. These stories still spread to

(28:15):
this day. But it all came down to the fact
that the Jews would not pay obeissance to the Roman gods,
which is of course the same thing that the early Christians,
who were largely Jews themselves, got into trouble with the
Romans as well.

Speaker 2 (28:33):
Yes, but the Jews had a special agreement with the
Roman Empire where they did not have to burn the
incense to the emperor. They were granted a privilege. The
Christians were not.

Speaker 3 (28:44):
That the Romans had all these gods and room for
any number of gods you wanted, but you had to
worship them all. You had to agree that they were
all gods. And so the Romans were perfectly willing to
accept the Jewish God and the divinity of Christ himself.

Speaker 1 (29:02):
But it didn't work in the other direction. The Jews.

Speaker 3 (29:07):
Neither the Jews nor the Christians were willing to accept
all the Roman gods, and so the Romans, angry that
they would not assimilate, began to persecute them.

Speaker 4 (29:18):
Okay, I guess I have to ask a tough question here.
How does Christianity play into anti Semitism.

Speaker 3 (29:29):
Well, unfortunately, there has been the idea throughout the history
of the Church that the Jews are the killers of Christ,
and because Christ is God, they're the killers of God himself.
And this charge of diacide, it's about the worst thing
you can accuse somebody of doing, and it has followed
them throughout history.

Speaker 2 (29:50):
Well, again, does it mean that a Jew in the
twenty first century is guilty for the death of Christ?
But clearly the Jewish community what was happening at the
time of Christ were those that had eyes to see
and ears to hear, or following the Messiah into the
New Covenant, which breaks down the distinction between jew and Gentile.

(30:11):
And then the other Jews that wanted to maintain what
we talked about in the Last Dream, the particularization that
God the Father uses from the time of Abraham to
the time of Christ, so that we can then see
through the prophecies the fulfillment of God using the Israelites
as the priest for bringing forth the blessing of the

(30:33):
entire world. But God is always the God of all nations.
God is not just the God of the Jews or
the Israelites. You find this multiple times in the Old
Testament here, so.

Speaker 1 (30:44):
It's it's.

Speaker 2 (30:46):
Quite interesting that he's claiming to actually quote scripture and say, look,
the Jewish community that did not want to give up
their privileged identity and refuse to recognize Christ as the
Messiah had a hand in his crucifixion and sort of
helped Pontia's pilot execute Christ kill God. That can be
true and obviously not condemning every person in the twenty

(31:09):
first century who identifies as a Jew as being guilty
of that, that's pretty easy. But even if again for him,
just quoting scripture and highlighting exactly what happened as a
historical event is worthy of being an anti semi and
he's arguing that this is one of the problems of Christianity.
Now again, another one he focused on is his book

(31:32):
is that we claim that the Church is Israel. But
that's literally the theology, and he argues that Christianity begin
to theologize the secessionism. Okay, which obviously we believe we're
under a new Covenant and because of that we theologized
the way.

Speaker 1 (31:48):
To that condone. But he believed his hate towards Jews,
and we don't hate Jews. What what I mean, it's
just crazy.

Speaker 2 (32:00):
You can tell that this is he definitely got his
seven thousand sheckles.

Speaker 3 (32:04):
And of course there are a few scriptures that give
rise to this. Paul says in first Thessalonians, or I
believe it's first, it might be second, but in any case,
that the Jews killed Christ. He says that basically in
so many words, and in Matthew, of course, when Jesus
is on the cross and Poncha's pilot says, I'm innocent.

(32:26):
I mean before Jesus is on the cross, when he's
on trial. Pancha's pilot says, I'm innocent of this man's blood.
And the Jews cry out, his blood be upon us
and upon our children. Antisemites throughout history have said, you see,
this means that all the Jews are responsible for the
killing of Christ and that they all bear a special

(32:46):
fault for it. Now, it seems to me this is
in total contradiction to basic Christianity across denominations, because we're
always taught and all the churches teach that it's our
sins that put the Lord on the cross. It's because
I am a bad guy that Jesus was on the cross,
And it's not because of any one particular person or

(33:09):
one particular group. It's everybody's fault and responsibility. And this
is one of the reasons why he redeems all of
our sins on the cross, because He is God can
bear them all. So it's sin that put him there
and sin he is expiating. So to blame a particular
people for this contradicts that if it's the Jews fault,

(33:31):
how can it be every single human being's fault because
all of sin and fall in short of the glory
of God.

Speaker 4 (33:38):
So I guess where it tilts my brain is, I'll
do a show like this when I get done, I'll
get out there and I will hear from Christians defending
what you just explained that and that is that the
Jews don't belong. Jews forfeited their right speak.

Speaker 1 (34:01):
Me defending the anti Semitic idea.

Speaker 2 (34:04):
Yes, do the Jews worship the same God that Christians do?
Do they worship the Trinity? Do they worship the Second Person?
They worship the Son of God? Do they worship the Logos?
What about the Holy Spirit?

Speaker 1 (34:18):
Like? What are we talking about here? What are we
talking about.

Speaker 2 (34:23):
That he goes online and here's people that believes in
the super Session of the Church that the Jews killed Christ.
I mean, that's that's what Jews are defined by now,
is the rejection of the Christian God, of the Messiah
who came. Is that not part of I mean explicitly,
like how theologically who they are in.

Speaker 1 (34:44):
The twenty first century? I mean historically, what are we
talking about?

Speaker 5 (34:49):
Yeah?

Speaker 3 (34:50):
Yeah, Unfortunately, well there again, Perry. One of the reasons
why I wrote the book that it seemed to me
these things are resurgent nowadays. We see prominent people, not
just prominent people on the left, where leftist anti Semitism
has been strong for years, although largely unacknowledged, we also
see it among people we many of us admired and

(35:12):
thought had sense, like Candice Owens or Tucker Carlson. It's
it's it's a.

Speaker 2 (35:17):
Owens or Tucker Carlson, the people we thought they had
Since what are they saying?

Speaker 1 (35:23):
That's so crazy?

Speaker 2 (35:25):
Calling out the state of Israel?

Speaker 1 (35:28):
What? What this is? This is the modern Holocaust? What?

Speaker 2 (35:32):
Robert?

Speaker 3 (35:33):
What a shame that this is happening. But it needs
to be confronted, and I think that we need to
ask Christians, especially, we need to rebuke this within the
Christian community and show people how this contradicts the whole
idea of the redemption that Christ won for us.

Speaker 2 (35:52):
That he did, But don't you have to follow Christ
to receive the grace that comes with him being your
Lord and savior. Don't you have to accept Jesus Christ
into your life, into your heart so that you can
actually be saved? So what, how, how does any of
the things what he said nullify the salvific victory of Christ.

Speaker 3 (36:16):
What if only one group put Jesus on the cross,
then how is he redeeming the sins of everyone? It
is the sin that there and nobody is without sin.

Speaker 4 (36:32):
Wow, Because part of the stuff that we're seeing today
and experiencing is uh.

Speaker 1 (36:38):
Wow.

Speaker 4 (36:39):
As an indicator is the recent teaching that the Old
Testament is insignificant, we don't need it today.

Speaker 3 (36:48):
Well, that's the Marcian Knight heresy. You know, it was
within the lifetime of disciples of the Twelve Apostles, that is,
people who learned from Paul, from John, from Matthew, Mark
and Luke from the Twelve Apostles, and they were still
alive in the early years excuse me, in the early

(37:10):
years of the second century, in the one thirties, when
there was a teacher named Marcian excuse me, who rejected
the Old Testament and taught that it was not the
same God that was depicted in the New Testament. And
this was officially rejected by the leaders of the church,
including people who had learned.

Speaker 2 (37:32):
Okay, but I'm Orthodox, I'm not a Marcian. And you literally,
Robert in your book, brother, you are Greek Orthodox. You
literally contradict the foundational ecclesiology of the Church. You contradict
what the Second Covenant means, You contradict just literal interpretation
of scripture. Like, what's the point of trying to characterize

(37:57):
everybody who has criticism of Israelism, how being Marcianites and
rejecting the God of the Old Testament. No, the God
of the Old Testament is the Trinity. What are we
doing here?

Speaker 1 (38:08):
This is why, this is.

Speaker 2 (38:09):
Why when people develop, like dab their toes into religious
dialogue that really have no theological grounding or understanding.

Speaker 1 (38:18):
They look incredibly foolish.

Speaker 2 (38:20):
It'd be like engaging in like, you know, sophisticated conversation,
have no background in philosophy or basic categories, basic logic, Like,
you just look foolish.

Speaker 1 (38:32):
It'd be like.

Speaker 2 (38:33):
Engaging in, you know, in a political discussion and not
having watched politics in a super long time of being
aware what's going on?

Speaker 1 (38:39):
What are you talking about? Dude?

Speaker 2 (38:42):
Your book is anti Orthodox and that's what we're going
to get into in the article. Is God an anti
semi That's what we're going to get into now, So guys,
smash that, like, appreciate you all for being here. Yeah,
I see people asking me in the chat. For some reason,
YouTube is not allowing me to set a super chat
goal in this stream. I think for most people that

(39:05):
are watching, the share button has been removed, so you
and I'm sure it has to do with the title
of the stream. I was obviously being a bit provocative,
but that's quite literally the title of the article we're
going to be reading now, So we're literally reading.

Speaker 1 (39:19):
An article on is God in anti Semite?

Speaker 2 (39:21):
But yeah, I think YouTube, I think they got me
with the title for today's stream.

Speaker 1 (39:30):
Total Gravity throws in twenty bucks.

Speaker 2 (39:32):
Thank you so much, Total Gravity, God bless you man,
really appreciate the support. Brother Brovett eighteen eighty one throws
in two bucks. Says Judaism meant well too, well, you know,
one of.

Speaker 1 (39:45):
The interesting things.

Speaker 2 (39:46):
So if you read the Old Testament, I mean, it's
not like God never said he was the god of
the other nations. He says that multiple times. I mean,
this is why he wants Jonah to rescue nineva right.
He doesn't want to destroy Ninevah because the sins have
in a sense, reached the threshold of God's mercy and compassion,

(40:06):
and he needs them to repent so that He doesn't,
you know, destroy them. And it's Jonah that doesn't want
them to be saved. And it's the Israelites who are
the most rebellious to God himself.

Speaker 1 (40:19):
If you read the Old Testament, so.

Speaker 2 (40:22):
I don't know if you're biblically literate, it kind of
makes sense. Coleman b throws in five says, if Christianity
is supposedly anti Semitic within itself, what is the path
going forward in regard to relations between Christians and Jews?

Speaker 1 (40:36):
Coleman, great question.

Speaker 2 (40:38):
According to Robert Spencer, I guess we have to change
the two thousand year theology of the church. According to him,
the tradition which he's a part of. Guys, I know
some people in the chat thought that Robert Spencer was Jewish. No,
that man is a Greek Orthodox Christian. His ancestors are
from Anatolia. According to his Wikipedia page, they were persecuted

(41:00):
by the Turks. So no, he he is Christian, He's Greek.
But clearly his hatred for Islam. Okay, I'm actually not
against most of his polemics against Islam, but clearly he's
chosen a side regarding Islam and Judaism and is now
making such explicitly pro Zionist, pro Jewish sentiments.

Speaker 1 (41:24):
I mean, that's what his book is, anti Semitism, history.

Speaker 2 (41:27):
And myth that he's undermining, like historic Christianity. I mean
he literally insinuates that the Byzantine Empire was anti Semitic
because of their stance on religion and their stance that
Jews can't hold political power over Christians. What what I

(41:47):
mean if, like you said, if we can't even believe
the base, it's not even like Christians are killing a
bunch of Jews, Like that is not happening. That is
not happening at all. What is the of trying to
undermine the basic premises of our faith? That is not
going to bode well? Like, that's what I don't get.
They keep doing everything that is working against them, right,

(42:11):
Ben Shapiro is losing the pr battle, and then he
goes on and advocates for h one b Visas. You know,
like Mark Levin's upset because people are calling him tel
Aviv Levin.

Speaker 1 (42:23):
But everything he posts about.

Speaker 2 (42:25):
Israel, like, well, what are these people doing? Do they
not see that it's just making it worse?

Speaker 1 (42:32):
Like just stop leave people alone. Quit the name calling.

Speaker 2 (42:37):
Like they they're critical of people criticizing Israel for legitimate criticisms,
but then they respond by an ad hominem calling you
an anti Semite, which most of us are not at all.
We have no hatred towards any anyone, but.

Speaker 1 (42:54):
Just saying factual things.

Speaker 2 (42:57):
I mean, how do you think people are gonna respond
you call me an anti Sis when I'm not and
I have a legitimate right, Like what.

Speaker 1 (43:04):
Do you think that's gonna do? Just engage in dialogue.

Speaker 2 (43:07):
That's the only way forward here, is just like honest
engagement in dialogue. That's you know, and maybe there's hope
through that. I mean, that's that is communion, That is
true communication. That's how you build community. Brother throws in
another two says many Jews are anti Semitic today, Isn't

(43:28):
that odd?

Speaker 1 (43:30):
I actually was thinking that today.

Speaker 2 (43:31):
I listened to Max Blumenthal on judging Apolitano, and I
was like, man, that dude goes harder at Israel and
modern Jews than anybody, and he is Jewish. I'm not
saying he's anti so again, because anti Semitism itself is
such a like misused term. Hebrew language is part of
the Semitic linguistic tree.

Speaker 1 (43:52):
So is Aramaic? So is Arabic?

Speaker 2 (43:56):
How are you anti Semitic because you criticize is that
makes zero sense? Like just based on the definitions of words.
And this is what GM Davis brings up. He's like,
why don't you call it Jewish hate? Why don't you
call it something else? Why do you use such the
broad term of anti Semitism?

Speaker 1 (44:16):
You know? So, all right, we're going to get into that.

Speaker 2 (44:19):
Let me do some quick housekeeping before we dive into
the article. So, if you guys are interested, you want
to join our community, the best way to support my
work is join oh.

Speaker 1 (44:30):
What is this?

Speaker 6 (44:32):
Oh?

Speaker 1 (44:33):
Okay? Is to join the Logos Academy.

Speaker 2 (44:39):
We're we got monthly fitness meetings, private discussions, exclusive content,
all types of stuff, private q and as. If you
want to join men's only philosophy and theology community of
like minded individuals trying to become the best masculine version
of themselves. This is men's only community. Join the Logos Academy.

(45:00):
If you'd be interested in sponsoring a stream, I'm getting
ready to go on a bit of a ten day
hiatus here to Nashville and Florida. But when I get back,
I'll be diving into a handful of sponsored streams. If
you have a topic you would like for me to
dive into, sponsor a stream, I'll get back to you
and set up the details of the topic. If anybody's
interested in setting up a one on one session, you

(45:21):
can do so with this link right here. We'd happy
to chat with you about any topic your heart desires.
Interested in getting my book, check out my website right here.
If you're interested in a signed author copy, those are
only hardbacks, so I only sell hardbacks to my website,
but if you'd like the cheaper paperback version, you can.

Speaker 1 (45:42):
Get it right here on Amazon.

Speaker 2 (45:44):
And if you're interested in your overall hormonal health and
interested in getting into some peptides. As I've told you
guys before, I'm doing a two month cycle here of
BPC one five seven.

Speaker 1 (45:55):
It helps rejuvenate gut lining. It's generally referred to as
the wolverine drug. It helps you heal aches and pains.
I've noticed it a different so.

Speaker 2 (46:09):
If you'd be interested, these are pretty expensive supplements, but
these are legitimate peptides, high quality peptides. If you use
promo code ct el CODAL use promo code ct e
L codal you will get a discount. And you can
also use that same promo code over at orthodoxdepot dot com.

(46:30):
If you're interested in some Orthodox items, use promo code
codal there as well, and you'll get a discount off
prayer ropes, necklaces, icons, Orthodox study bibles, all types of stuff.
So if those are something that you'd be interested in,
use promo code codal c ot e L.

Speaker 1 (46:49):
And you will get a discount. All right, let me
pull that down.

Speaker 2 (46:53):
Okay, Now that being said, let's get into our article
for today. Is God an anti Semite. So this is
the main topic at hand for our discussion. Today's we're
actually going to read through this entire article. It's a
bit lengthy, but it's very interesting. And so this is
a GM Davis, author of Antichrist The Fulfillment of Globalization.

(47:16):
I told you it was globalism and Antichrist. I have
this book.

Speaker 1 (47:20):
It's decent. I really like it. I actually cite it.

Speaker 2 (47:23):
In my book. I just wish it had an index.
That's the only thing I wish it had was an index.
But good quality stuff published over by Uncut Mountain Press,
and so GM Davis, who himself is a PhD, writes
this article from September twelfth, so just a couple months
ago over on the Orthodox Ethos website, and I'll share

(47:47):
this link if anybody wants to have it themselves where
he then is criticizing Robert Spencer's book Anti Semitism, History
and Myth. So we're gonna go through that right now.
And if you guys have any questions or comments and
want to support the stream or me kind of going
out on a limit actually doing streams on these topics.

(48:10):
Obviously it can be a bit dangerous talking about sort
of edgy topics.

Speaker 1 (48:17):
So if you'd like to support my work, please do it.
Greatly appreciate it.

Speaker 2 (48:23):
MGM studies throws intent, says the a areosophy stream and
connection to modern anti Jewish sentiment and American nationalism. We
should we should show how nationalism without Jesus is just
Judaism and new skin. That's a great point. That's a

(48:46):
great point. Yeah, No, that's a that's a I can't
really argue with that.

Speaker 1 (48:53):
When MGM studies.

Speaker 2 (48:56):
Fair enough, fair enough, I think anything any thing without
Jesus endo up a type of Antichrist spirit. For sure,
so all right, let's get into the article here. GM
Davis begins. Mister Robert Spencer has published his twenty ninth
book entitled Anti Semitism, History and Myth. Mister Spencer is

(49:16):
mainly known for his work on the study of Islam
and Jihad, though he has also published on other subjects
as well, including titles such as Empire of God, How
the Byzantine Saves Civilization, and from Uncut Mountain Press his
small but useful book The Church and the Pope. Mister Spencer,
a prolific and best selling author, also serves as director

(49:37):
of the website Jihad Watch.

Speaker 1 (49:39):
Okay, and the only.

Speaker 2 (49:41):
Notable thing last one here is he is a Senior
Fellow at the Center for Security Policy and Shilman Fellow
at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, So obviously the Zionism
would make sense there. It would be fair to classify
my treatment here of anti Semitism as more of a
lim mimitted critique rather than a true review. A proper

(50:03):
critique would no doubt require a book unto itself. Furthermore,
one imagines that the book will be reviewed elsewhere, and
due to its many claims and rather want of structure.
A straightforward review of its many moving parts while simultaneously
trying to extricate its core assertions, would at least for
this writer, be quite difficult. One might even describe mister

(50:25):
Spencer's book as an exercise in pill polism, a relevant
term to any investigation of Judaism and thus anti Semitism,
though mister Spencer never mentions it. We will have occasion, therefore,
to discuss at links several of mister Spencer's central points,
with the inclusion of relevant outside quotations in order to
facilitate our analysis. Mister Spencer gives as his reason for

(50:50):
writing Anti Semitism as follows. He states toward the end
of his introduction that quote one of these former friends
accused me of inconsistency, namely inconsistency with respect to taking
Islamic doctrine and history to task, but not Judaism and
Jewish history. If I did carry out such an investigation,
one longtime associate insisted, I would see that what I

(51:14):
was dismissing as anti Semitism was justified and reasonable suspicion,
and that to dismiss it as such was tantamount to
dismissing concern about jihad or Islamophobia. Very well, here, old friend,
is that investigation. Furthermore, in his acknowledgment, so what is
he's saying? He's saying that the book Anti Semitism that

(51:36):
Robert Spencer wrote was a review of how Judaism could
be a threat to Christianity just like Islam. Of course,
what it is is a massive defense of all things
Judaism and a critique of Islam and Christianity. Again, for
those not aware, Robert Spencer is a Greek Orthodox Christian. Okay,

(51:59):
mister Spencer's the idea for this book arose from discussions
with two people I had respected and admired, but not
in the usual way. They know who they are, and
I dedicate this book in particular to them, in what
somewhat quixotic hope that it will move them to reconsider
their position. So they must hold what he deems as

(52:19):
anti Semitic positions.

Speaker 1 (52:21):
Oh okay. Interesting.

Speaker 2 (52:23):
One wonders why mister Spencer is reluctant to tell us
about the people who prompted his writing of anti Semitism,
especially if a stated goal is to just swear.

Speaker 1 (01:00:00):
M what Oh my.

Speaker 2 (01:00:40):
Gosh, okay, uh check check check do you gotta hear me.

Speaker 1 (01:00:52):
No audio.

Speaker 7 (01:00:55):
What hmm.

Speaker 2 (01:01:12):
Check check check you guys hear me. Yeah, I haven't
done anything different. There was no setting that was off,
there was no microphone that was off stream Yard showing
that my microphone was fine the whole time. But that's crazy.

(01:01:42):
How the heck did that get turned off?

Speaker 1 (01:01:46):
That's crazy?

Speaker 7 (01:01:48):
Wow?

Speaker 2 (01:01:48):
All right, well, let's go back. Somebody said, when did
it cut out.

Speaker 1 (01:01:57):
Back here? Dude?

Speaker 2 (01:02:02):
That's crazy. That's crazy because I can see it all
on stream yard.

Speaker 1 (01:02:07):
That's crazy.

Speaker 2 (01:02:08):
The audio on streamyard is totally fine. It's the exact
same it just was. This is YouTube messing with me.
All right, let's restart here. Okay, all right.

Speaker 1 (01:02:30):
Well we'll start.

Speaker 2 (01:02:31):
Somebody said it began to cut out around this section here,
so we can start there. We got a super chat
in on dono Chat from Bill Hicks throws in five bucks.
Thank you so much, Bill, He says, excellent stream. I
decided to donate through super or through dono Chat, so
YouTube doesn't take its thirty percent kosher certification tax. By

(01:02:52):
the way, everyone downloads this stream before they shut it down.

Speaker 1 (01:02:56):
Yeah. I can't believe they muted me.

Speaker 2 (01:02:59):
It's saying that my bit rate is low and my
internet is totally fine. So funny how this stuff happens
during these streams.

Speaker 1 (01:03:11):
That is so funny.

Speaker 2 (01:03:13):
That is so funny because on stream yard nothing changed.
They fucked with my bit rate to mess up my stream.

Speaker 1 (01:03:23):
Oh my gosh.

Speaker 8 (01:03:25):
All right, all right, well, oh wow, okay, Well we're
going to restart this whole thing and move forward.

Speaker 2 (01:03:38):
So we got a lot to get through. Yeah, I'm
gonna check the chat more often now that we're doing
you know, most of the time I can just work
through a document. But good lord, I knew the title
was gonna be a little bit catchy, right, Yeah, craziest

(01:04:01):
title I've ever seen. I knew it'd be a bit catchy.
That was the goal, right, It was a big clickbaity.
I knew the goal or the title was probably gonna
catch the algo. But it is what it is. All right,
let's just restart the whole thing. Let's just restart the
whole article. Now we're going to restart the whole article,

(01:04:25):
all right? Is God an anti semi? This is GM
Davis's PhD, author of Antichrist, The Fulfillment of Globalization, a
great book. As I said, I actually cited and quoted
in my own book, Returned to Babylon From Adam to Antichrist.
This is his critique of Robert Spencer, Zionist Orthodox Christian

(01:04:47):
and his newest book in twenty twenty five, Anti Semitism,
History and Myth. So we're gonna this first section here
as we read. This is just kind of giving you know,
the credentials of Robert Spencer. He works under David Horowitz
at the Freedom Center. He has multiple books, and we'll

(01:05:11):
begin here for why. Mister Spencer claims. The reason for
why he wrote the book, and basically what I was
mentioning earlier is he is writing this book to investigate
Judaism from the claims that he's heard from fellow Christians.

Speaker 1 (01:05:29):
Okay, so very interesting. Okay.

Speaker 2 (01:05:32):
Mister Spencer gives as his reason for writing Anti Semitism
as follows. He states, toward the end of his introduction
that quote one of these former friends accused me of inconsistency,
namely inconsistency with respect to Islamic doctrine and history to task,
but not to Judaism in Jewish history. If I did

(01:05:55):
carry out such an investigation, one longtime associate insisted I
would see that what I was dismissing as anti Semitism
was justified in reasonable suspicion, and that to dismiss it
as such was tantamount to dismissing concern about jihad in
Islamophobia or jihad as Islamophobia. Very well, here, old friend,

(01:06:15):
is that investigation. So that is Robert Spencer describing why
he's writing the book. So this is an investigation into Judaism,
which really turns into an undermining of Okay, Islam, fair enough,
but Christianity as an Orthodox Christian, as we talked about
in the opening, he believes the Church being Israel is
anti semitic. The idea that the Jews were behind the

(01:06:35):
crucifixion of Christ as anti semitic, that Jews don't worship
the same God as Christians as anti semitic, That the
Byzantine Empire not allowing Jews to build synagogues, evangelize their faith,
or have political power over Christians was anti semitic. He
specifically refers to Saint John Chrysostom, Saint Augustine, Saint Jerome

(01:06:57):
as examples of anti Semitism. So this is what we're
getting from this book. Just fyi Furthermore, and his acknowledgments,
mister Spencer states the idea for this book arose from
discussions with two people I had respected admired, but not
in the usual way. They know who they are, and

(01:07:19):
I dedicate this book in particular to them in the
somewhat quixotic hope that it will move them to reconsider
their position. So they're Christians and he wants them to
reconsider their position regarding Judaism. That's what it sounds like, okay.
One wonders why Minster Spencer is reluctant to tell us

(01:07:41):
about the people who prompted his writing of anti Semitism,
especially if a stated goal is to dissuade them of
their views. Possible insight is provided by mister Spencer when
he proceeds to quote Martin Eimoler's famous statement about the
German failure to stand up to the National Socialists. You know,
this is the famous quote, and Spencer is quoting it

(01:08:03):
in his book. First they came for the socialists. I
did not speak out because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionist. I did not
speak out because I was not a trade unionist. Then
they came for the Jews, and I did not speak
out because I was not a Jew. Then they came
for me and there was no one left to speak
for me. We will have occasion to remark on the

(01:08:24):
various laws and proposed laws to curtail anti Semitism. Needless
to say, they are not coming from mister Spencer, but
for the alleged anti Semites. In this case, the tide
is running strongly with rather than against him, Meaning the
political momentum in America is certainly in step, as we've

(01:08:45):
seen with the Trump administration with tackling anti Semitism. So
Robert Spencer finds good company. In his new book, Anti
Semitism in the Dock, Mister Spencer begins with what one
takes to be an anti Semitic canard. The question at
hand is whether Judaism actually teaches and condone such a

(01:09:08):
moral and antisocial behavior. So, for example, would be reading
the Talmod and seeing maybe what it says about Goyam
non Jewish women, the age in which a Jew may
be able to attempt fornication with such entity, what it
says about Jesus Christ or the Theotokos, things like that,

(01:09:30):
So whether Jews believe those things.

Speaker 1 (01:09:32):
At least we can find those in the Talmud. Those
are in the Talmud.

Speaker 2 (01:09:35):
Right, so, he says he because of the questioning of
his friends, the point of his book is to question
whether Judaism actually teaches or condone such.

Speaker 1 (01:09:46):
Immoral and anti social behavior.

Speaker 2 (01:09:49):
Okay, fair enough, let's see if they do. But then
he says, and whether Jews have really engaged in it
on a large scale in order to further shadowy goals
of conquests and world domination that they have done their
best to conceal, but that non Jews have nevertheleft discovered. Well,
that kind of throws it all out the window, right,
because now what you're investigating conspiracy theories about them, right,

(01:10:13):
is is that what he's saying that the point of
the book is not to investigate whether they happen per se,
but to investigate.

Speaker 1 (01:10:25):
The conspiracies about world domination. Huh. That's strange.

Speaker 2 (01:10:30):
That doesn't that doesn't seem like a strong, a strong
way to present your you know, your investigation into Judaism.
All right, moving forward here, The first part of this
statement is in particular, it is in principle at least

(01:10:51):
open to debate. True, do does Judaism, teach or condone
certain moral behaviors that you can debate. That is an
objective category up for discussion, especially with regards to concealing actions.
The second part, especially in regards to concealing actions, I
operating as a conspiracy is almost by definition impossible to

(01:11:11):
prove a competent conspiracy by nature remains hidden. To discover
conspiracy is to render it no longer effectively conspiratorial. In
this essay, we will concentrate on the first part of
mister Spencer's claim and whether Jews have really engaged in
it on a large scale, notwithstanding shadowy goals of conquest
and world domination. Okay, mister Spencer. Many of mister Spencer's

(01:11:37):
claims are so obvious as to not warn a great
deal of attention. Or Islamic sources such as Orthodox Islamic
sources such as the Koran and Hadith, are inadvertently anti Jewish.
Adolf Hitler and the Nazis were very, very bad people. Okay,
we get it.

Speaker 1 (01:11:53):
We get it.

Speaker 2 (01:11:55):
So he's saying, you know, examples of animosity towards Jews. Okay,
we will take the space available to us to focus
on mister Spencer's more relevant claims for Orthodox Christians, of
which mister Spencer is one, though he does not here
say so, namely that such luminaries as Saint Augustine, Saint Jerome,

(01:12:17):
and Saint John Chrisostom convinced anti Semitism.

Speaker 1 (01:12:21):
What we will.

Speaker 2 (01:12:23):
Have occasion to quote the Lord Jesus Christ himself and
his indictment of the Jewish leadership of his day as
evidence of the objective, irreducible divide that separates the Orthodox
Christian and Judaic faiths. We will note the great Prophet
Moses and other prophets admonitions of the ancient Israelites. We

(01:12:44):
will briefly examine the disastrous Israeli Palestinian conflict, and we
will also explore in some depth the nature of the
greatest bloodbath ever to befall an Orthodox Christian people, namely
the Bolshevik Communist Revolution. With mister Spencer's polite, mical study
of anti Semitism in one's lap, two questions immediately spring
to mind. How far in the current social cultural atmosphere

(01:13:09):
can one critique the policies of the Jewish state the
State of Israel before one attracts the epithet anti Semite
and two is a critical analysis of the Judaic religion
itself possible to any serious degree without attracting a reflexive
accusation of anti Semitism. Mister Spencer's book amounts to a

(01:13:30):
great deal of anti anti anti Semitism, and it suggests
the phenomenon of how the term anti Semitism may be
used against even ingenuous critics of policies of the State
of Israel, and certainly anyone who approaches the third rail
of Judaism itself. Mister Spencer comes across as ambivalent when

(01:13:51):
it comes to actually forbidding through law what he defines
as anti Semitic speech, example given denying the Holocaust, which
is illegal in many European countries and has led to
prison time for convicted offenders. So what is anti Semitism?
A significant emission in the book Anti Semitism, History and

(01:14:13):
Myth is the absence of any working definition of what
anti Semitism actually means. What is exactly anti Semitism? Mister
Spencer seems to assume that we already know he does
mention quote hatred of Jews, But if anti semitism roughly
translate to hatred of Jews, then we need to have
a reasonably clear understanding of what it means to be

(01:14:36):
a Jew, another term that mister Spencer leaves undefined.

Speaker 1 (01:14:40):
We will come to what.

Speaker 2 (01:14:41):
It means to be a Jew in modern society and
due course a subject that I just discussed in my
last livestream, what is a Jew? We actually document Jewish
identity from Creation to Abraham, Abraham to Christ and Christ
to the present day. And I compare Orthodox eschatology with
Jewish eschatology. So if that's something you're interested to check

(01:15:01):
out my last dream we hit on a lot of
that stuff. One is compelled to ask why the broad
term anti semitism for something that specifically means hatred of Jews,
why not a more precise term such as anti Judaism
or Judeophobia, or even misso Judaism or misso jew Anti

(01:15:23):
Semitism as a term in the public mind first made
its appearance in the nineteenth century and the German press
long after antipathy towards Jews appeared as a historical phenomenon,
and after the emancipiatory policies that largely freed Jews from
the ghettos, which policies became widespread throughout Western and Central
Europe following the French Revolution in the First French Empire.

(01:15:46):
After all, many Jews are not Semites, and most Semites
are not Jews. One might also observe further that many
Jews are not Zionists, and most or many Zionists are
not Jews. Still, anti Semitism is what has come down
to us today and is the subject of mister Spencer's book,
so we will continue to make reference to it, though

(01:16:08):
with caution orthodox Christian attitudes towards the synagogue.

Speaker 1 (01:16:14):
A basic reality and.

Speaker 2 (01:16:16):
Our starting point for analysis of mister Spencer's book here
on an Orthodox Christian platform, is that there has always existed,
from the days of Our Lord's soljourn on Earth in
the early Church, a fundamental disagreement and tension between the
Orthodox Church and what became Rabbinic Judaism. Mister Spencer is
clearly aware of this tension, but all too readily seems

(01:16:38):
willing to cast it into the bin of a rational
anti Semitism. Whenever there is a question as to who
stands in the wrong, either Rabbinic Judaism or Orthodox Christianity,
he invariably seems to side with the former. The Gospels themselves,
and many of the Apostolic epistles testify to this tension,
as do many of the great Early Church. Mister Spencer

(01:17:01):
takes to task Saint John Chrysostom, who stated in a
series of homilies, So this is quoting Saint John Chrysostom
right now, But do not be surprised that I called
the Jews pitable. They really are pitable and miserable. When
so many blessings from heaven came into their hands, they
thrust them aside, and were at great pains to reject them.

(01:17:23):
The morning sun of justice arose for them, but they
thrust aside its rays and still sit in darkness. We
Orthodox Christians, who were nurtured by darkness, drew the light
to ourselves and were freed from the gloom of their air.
They were the branches of that holy root, but those
branches were broken. We had no share in the root,

(01:17:46):
but we did. We did reap the fruit of godliness.
From their childhood. They read the prophets, but they crucified
him whom they the prophets had foretold. We did not
hear the divine prophecies, but we did worship Him of
whom they prophesies. And so they are pitiful because they

(01:18:07):
rejected the blessings which were sent to them, while others
seized hold of these blessings and drew them to themselves.
Although those Jews had been called to the adoption of sons,
they fell in kinship with dogs. We who were dogs,
received the strength, through God's grace to put aside the
irrational nature which was ours, and to rise to the

(01:18:29):
honor of sons.

Speaker 1 (01:18:30):
How do I prove this?

Speaker 2 (01:18:31):
Christ said, quote, it is no fair to take the
children's bread and to cast it to dogs unquote Matthew
fifteen twenty six. Christ was speaking to the Canaanite woman
when he called the Jews' children and the Gentiles dogs.
But at any rate, the Jews say that they too

(01:18:52):
adore God. God forbid that I say that. No Jew
adores God. Who says so? The Son of God says so?
For he said, quote, if you were to know my father,
you would also know me. But you neither know me,
nor do you know my father, John eight nineteen. Could
I produce a witness more trustworthy than the Son of God?

(01:19:12):
If then the Jews failed to know the Father, If
they crucified the son. If they thrust off the help
of the spirit, who should not make bold to declare
plainly that the synagogue is a dwelling of demons. God
is not worshiped there, Heaven forbid. From now on it
remains a place of idolatry. But still some people pay
it honor as a holy place. Many things doth he

(01:19:36):
intimate by this parable of the vine dress or sat
or in Matthew twenty one, verse thirty three through forty one,
God's providence which had been exercised towards them, the Jews
from the first, their murderous disposition, from the beginning, that
nothing had been admitted of whatever pertained to a heedful

(01:19:57):
care of them, That even when prophets had been he
had not turned away from them, but had sent his
very son, That the God, both of the New and
of the Old Testament, was one and the same, He,
that his death should affect great blessings, that they were
to endure extreme punishment for the crucifixion and their crime,

(01:20:18):
the calling of the Gentiles, the casting out of the Jews.
Saint John Crisostom, Homily sixty eight on Matthew twenty one,
It is important to bear in mind that in the
time of Saint John Crisostom, to be a Jew meant
that one practiced the Rabbinic Judaic religion, not simply that
one was ethnically Jewish. And the two are not one

(01:20:40):
and the same in our time, And the two are
not one and the same in our time sixteen centuries later,
more anon Saint John had in mind Judaic beliefs and
practices in his homilies. So we asked, was Saint John
Crisostom calling out a legitimate difference between Jews and Christians,
or was he indeed proving himself antisemitic as mister Spencer implies.

(01:21:05):
Could it have been that Saint John Chrysosen was concerned
for the spiritual welfare of his flock much as Saint
Paul had been, and regretted the Judaizing tendencies of some
of his parishioners. Let us recall the words of Saint Paul,
for you also suffered the same things from your own countrymen,
just as they did from the Judaeans, who killed both

(01:21:27):
Lord Jesus and their own prophets, and have persecuted us.
And they do not please God in our contrary to
all men forbidding us to speak to the gentiles, that
they may be saved, so as always to fill up
the measure of their sins. But wrath has come upon
them through the utter most first Thessalonians two fourteen through sixteen,

(01:21:49):
and the scathing words of the Lord himself. Woe to you,
scribes and pharisees, hypocrites, because you build the tombs of
the prophets and adorn the maniments of the righteous, and
say quote, if we had lived in the days of
our fathers, we would not have been partakers in them,
in the blood of the prophets. Therefore you are witnesses

(01:22:10):
against yourselves, that you are sons of those who murdered
the prophets. Fill up then the measure of your father's guilt, serpents,
broods of vipers, how can you escape the condemnation of hell. Therefore,
indeed I send you prophets, wise men and scribes. Some
of them you will kill and crucify. Some of them

(01:22:31):
you will scourge in your synagogues and persecute from city
to city, that you may come all the righteous bloodshed
on the earth, from the blood of righteous able to
the blood of Zachariah son of Berekayah, whom you murdered
between the temple and the altar. Assuredly, I say to you,

(01:22:51):
all things will come upon this generation Matthew twenty three,
Verses twenty nine through thirty six, where Saint John Chrysostom
and Saint Paul and the Lord himself are invincing anti Semitism.
But what one might ask, does all this have to
do with Judaism today? Is it important to remember that

(01:23:13):
the Pharisees of the Lord's time were the intellectual and
spiritual forebears of what became Rabbinic Judaism in the early
centuries AD, and which continues to this day as Quote
classical or Orthodox Judaism. Yet in the modern age, many
Jews are not religiously observant, just as many Christians and
others are not either, and one hesitates to apply these

(01:23:34):
condemnations to people who neither believe nor practice the Judaic faith,
even if they continue to identify as secular Jews. Thus
a brief summation of the Orthodox Christian attitude towards Judaism
and its adherents Quote, do not be deceived. Though Jews
learn the saying of the prophets and understand truly Christ
is the almighty Redeemer of the world unquote, Judaic attitudes

(01:23:57):
towards the Church. As if to inculcate his more sensitive
readers to what follows, mister Spencer introduces Princeton Professor Peter
Schaeffer's Jesus in the Talmud with the words. In his
fascinating and groundbreaking book The Contemporary Scholar, Peter Schaeffer discusses

(01:24:18):
passages from the Talmud that have been taken as referring
to Jesus. And we must remember that in Judaism, it
is the Talmud, especially the Babylonian Talmud, rather than the
Old Testament, that is the ultimate authority.

Speaker 1 (01:24:30):
Quote.

Speaker 2 (01:24:31):
Not only does the Talmud contain the entirety of Jewish law,
from ritual law to family laws to torts, it is
also a work of ethics, philosophy, biography, literature, history, and
folk tales. That is Rabbi Noson. Wise, the Talmud is
the prism receiving and refracting all light. This is Rabbi

(01:24:53):
Jacob Nausner. Into that writing, all prior canonical writings emerged
to it. All appeal is directed upon it, all conclusions
ultimately rest in the language of Torah itself. Study of
the Torah begins as a matter of simple ubiquitous fact,
and the Talmud and all decisions of law that expresses

(01:25:14):
theology and everyday action. The Talmud forms the final statement
of the Torah, medigating scripture's rules. Jewish tradition holds that
the Talmud is the oral Torah, or a verbal explanation
of the laws that God gave to Moses on Mount Sinai,
and that Moses taught to others. What is lesser known

(01:25:35):
is that Moses and God had a good chat on
the mountain that ranged far beyond what could be inscribed
on the tablets that he brought with him when he
climbed back down. It is in this information transmitted orally
from God to Moses, and then from Moses to the
generation that followed him, that is the basis for the Talmud.

Speaker 1 (01:25:54):
Rabbi Aaron Perry.

Speaker 2 (01:25:57):
Of course, the good chat between God and Moses was
recorded at length in the Book of Exodus, with its
extensive instructions and commands to the Israelites, rather than existing
off the record in oral form, as Judaic scholars would
have us believe the Old Testament tells us quote. So
Moses came and told the people all the words of

(01:26:18):
the Lord and all the judgments. And all the people
answered with one voice and said, quote all the words
which the Lord has said, we will do unquote. And
Moses wrote all the words of the Lord. And he
rose early in the morning and built an altar at
the foot of the mountain and twelve pillars according to
the twelve tribes of Israel. Then he sent young men

(01:26:38):
of the children of Israel, who offered burnt offerings and
sacrifice peace offerings of oxen to the Lord. And Moses
took half the blood and put it in basins, and
half the blood sprinkled on the altar. Then he took
the Book of the Covenant and read it in the

(01:27:01):
hearing of the people. And they said, all the Lord
has said.

Speaker 1 (01:27:04):
We will do and be obedient.

Speaker 2 (01:27:06):
And Moses took the blood, sprinkled it on the people,
and said, this is the blood of the Covenant, which
the Lord has made with you according to these words
Exodus twenty four three through eight. In short, it was
the Book of the Covenant, not any additional oral Torah
that God sanctified with the people of Israel in Mount Sinai,

(01:27:27):
yet to read the Book of Exodus seriously as well
as the rest of the Old Testament and acknowledged the
invalidity of the oral Torah would rob the rabbis of
their interpretive authority.

Speaker 1 (01:27:38):
Quote.

Speaker 2 (01:27:39):
This supposed transmission of the oral Torah the tradition of
the elders from Moses to Joshua to the prophets, was
challenged by Jesus Christ, who termed it not Torah, but
the commandments of men, which nullify irrevocably the word and
doctrine of God, making the tale of the transmission itself
a fraud. That is Hoffman Judaism discovered page one eight seven.

(01:28:01):
Jesus answered and said to them, well, did Isaiah.

Speaker 1 (01:28:05):
Prophesy of you hypocrites? As it is.

Speaker 2 (01:28:07):
Written this people honors me with their lips, but their
heart is far from me, and in vain do they
worship me, teaching as doctrines and commandments of men. For
laying aside the commandments of God, you hold the tradition
of men, the washing of pictures and cups, and many
other things.

Speaker 1 (01:28:26):
Such things you do.

Speaker 2 (01:28:27):
Mark seven six through twelve as the to as the Talmud.
These commandments of men, which Christ censured for suffocating ordinary
Jews and twisting the word of God, eventually came to
be nothing short of divinized in Orthodox Rabbinic Judaism, whereas
an Orthodox Christianity, God became flesh in Jesus Christ and

(01:28:47):
Orthodox Judaism, the Babylonian Talmud represents God in the flesh,
not unlike the Quran and Islam, which Orthodox Muslims regard
as uncreated and pre eternal. And that is is Rabbi
Jacob Nelsner and Bruce Chilton, God in the world, and
it was quoted in Davis's book Antichrist, The Fulfillment of Globalization.

(01:29:14):
To return to doctor Peter Shaffer's Jesus in the Talmud,
the question arises as to what the Talmud actually teaches
Visavi Jesus Christ, his most pure mother, the Theotokos, never
Virgin Mary, and the Church in general. Mister Spencer asked
rhetorically whether the Talmud is an absurd, ugly and immoral book.
Mister Spencer's answer is no, but Professor Shaffer's research belies

(01:29:34):
the truth of the matter. The Talmud indeed maligns Christ,
his mother, and his followers, and in truly ugly ways.
Doctor Shaffer, who is clearly not a Christian partisan, interprets
the Babylonian Talmudic treatment of the church claims as a
quote powerful counter narrative that was meant to shake the
foundations of the Christian message. For, according to them the

(01:29:58):
Amorium or Benneck compilers of the Babylonian Talmud, Jesus was
not born from a virgin, as his followers claim, but
of out of wedlock, the son of a whore and
her Roman lover. Therefore, he could not be the Messiah
of divinic descent, let alone the son of God. Schaeffer,
page ten, and I referenced this book recently guys I

(01:30:21):
mentioned that if you guys are interested in some of
these topics.

Speaker 1 (01:30:24):
Check out this book right here, Jesus and the Talmud.
This is the book that they're referring to. It's not
that big.

Speaker 2 (01:30:30):
It's a good read. It's a good one. It's a
good one for you to have.

Speaker 1 (01:30:35):
In your library.

Speaker 2 (01:30:36):
It's called Jesus in the Talmud by doctor Peter Shaeffer.
And as I said, as GM highlights, this is not coming.
This is not some orthodox Christian, this is a secular scholar.

Speaker 1 (01:30:46):
Okay, all right? Moving forward.

Speaker 2 (01:30:51):
Jesus Christ, the Messiah of the Church and the second
person in the Holy Trinity, was, Furthermore, according to the
Talmud quote, a bad student who rebelled against his rabbinic teach,
and accordingly, the rabbis passed upon him their harshest judgment.
Not only did they enter entertain lewde sexual thoughts, but
when rebuked by his rabbi, he became apostate and established

(01:31:14):
a new cult. The message, therefore is that the new
Christian sex last religion stem from a failed and insubordinate
rabbinical student.

Speaker 1 (01:31:22):
Chapter three. Schaeffer again this book Jesus in the Talmud.

Speaker 2 (01:31:26):
Accordingly, and one has to say, shockingly, Jesus's fate consists
of sitting forever in hell, in boiling excrement that's the
thirteenth page of Schaeffer's book quote, and that those who
follow his example up until today will not, as he
has promised, gain eternal life.

Speaker 1 (01:31:46):
But will share his horrible fate.

Speaker 2 (01:31:48):
So you and I will also burn in excrement. Strangely,
the Talmud does not strictly deny all powers to Christ
and his followers. It acknowledges what might be described as
quote crist Christian magic, but it obviously condemns Christianity as
possessed of any divine mandate.

Speaker 1 (01:32:06):
Quote.

Speaker 2 (01:32:07):
Hence, our story ultimately conveys the message this Jesus and
his followers claim to have the keys to Heaven to
use their magical power with divine authorization, but they are
dead wrong. The fact that Heaven accepts what they do
does not mean that it approves of it. On the contrary,
they are tricksters and impostors who abuse their power. The

(01:32:29):
real power and authorities still rest with their opponents, the
rabbis Schaefer, page sixty two. The rabbis, the heroes of
Herabinic Judaism, who hold an interpretive monopoly over the Talmud,
convey an inverted interpretation of the Orthodox Christian understanding of
Christ's sacrificial death that both confirms the Church's teachings as

(01:32:50):
well as stands the meaning of christ sacrifice on its head.
The Babylonian Talmud affirms that quote, yes, the Roman governor
pont A Pilot wanted to set him Jesus free, but
we the Jewish rabbinate did not give in. He was
a blasphemer and idolater, and although the Romans could probably

(01:33:11):
not care less, we insisted that he get what he deserves.
We even convinced the Roman governor, or more precisely, forced
him to accept that this heretic and imposer postor needed
to be executed, and we are proud of it. That
is a quote again page seventy four from Jesus in
the Talmud from Peter Schaeffer, Rabbinic pride in the role

(01:33:36):
of the execution of the Lord Jesus echoes the gospel
message that the Jewish leadership of their day were indeed
guilty and decide of deicide, and that their spiritual errors
those who maintain the pride and killing of Christ are
as well. Quote and all the people answered and said,
his blood be on us and our children unquote Matthew

(01:33:57):
twenty seven to twenty five. That is the verse after
Pontius Pilot says basically, I'm clean of this man's blood.

Speaker 1 (01:34:04):
I am not taking the guilt for.

Speaker 2 (01:34:05):
The execution of Jesus of Nazareth. This is on you, Pharisees,
This is on you guys and that's the quote that
he's referring to. Presumably, not all Jews or even Judaic
believers today persist in taking quote pride in the killing
of Jesus of Nazareth, yet they do persist in rejecting
him as the Christ. Spencer treats the charge of diocide

(01:34:26):
and the cry of the Jerusalem mob that quote his
blood be on us and our children unquote in a
novel in peculiar way. He argues that quote the ancient
charges of diocide, as mainstream as they were, were incompatible
with the fundamental tenets of Christian theology. That it is
that it was the sin of all human beings that
put Christ on the cross, not one particular group. That's

(01:34:49):
Robert Spencer's false, heretical claim here. He has a point, though,
as a matter of logic, the theological conviction and the
universality of human sinfulness that scores the crucifixion of Christ
does not negate the historical reality as accounted in the
Gospels and confirmed in the Babylonian Talmud, that it was
the Judaic leadership of the day that was the approximate

(01:35:12):
cause of the death of God on the cross. Yet,
according to Spencer, the mob's apparent self impercussion represents quote
not an everlasting indictment of the Jews, but a statement
of the mechanism of redemption. Indeed, the blood of Christ

(01:35:33):
is central to the saga.

Speaker 1 (01:35:34):
Of redemption for all people.

Speaker 2 (01:35:38):
All people, that is, who accept Jesus as the Christ,
rather than a malefactor who is wrongly condemned, executed, and
who properly spins eternity and hell and circumstances.

Speaker 1 (01:35:49):
One would rather not repeat.

Speaker 2 (01:35:52):
The tension between the Church and Rabbinic Judaism simply cannot
be resolved. It is and has been a permanent reality
of Orthodox Christian and Judaic relation throughout history. Neologisms such
as Judeo Christian a phrase that happily mister Spencer does
not employ the one his adulence bat yailor I don't
know who that is does, whether in reference to actual

(01:36:15):
religious belief or to a vaguer ethnic simply fail to
wash or a vaguer ethic. They are really oxymorons that
try to paper over the very real and irreducible differences
between the two faiths for social, political, and other reasons.
From an Orthodox Christian perspective, while always being guided by

(01:36:36):
the Lord's command to love one another, indeed, to love
our enemies. There is simply no ground for compromising with
the Judaic rejection of Jesus at the.

Speaker 1 (01:36:44):
Christ as the Christ.

Speaker 2 (01:36:46):
Indeed, to love people, including Jews, requires the unwavering affirmation
that Jesus is the Christ and the Orthodox Church is
His body on earth, and that means by which all
people can achieve salvation through the Great of God. Anything
less is a cop out and a disservice to those
outside the Church who are perishing for want of true,

(01:37:08):
loving Orthodox Christian witness. Next section Anti Semitism in the
Old Testament. But the tension between the Church and the
Synagogue predated the advent of Christ and can be observed
throughout the course of the Old Testament. Between those of
the Hebrew people who kept the Lord's commands and laws,
and who loved Him in their hearts, and those who

(01:37:29):
quote played the harlot with other gods and bowed down
to them, those who turned quickly from the way in
which their fathers walked and obeying the commandments of the Lord.
They did not do so unquote Judges two seventeen.

Speaker 1 (01:37:43):
Quote.

Speaker 2 (01:37:43):
In the old days, the Jews acted impiously towards the prophets.
Now they outrage the master of the prophets unquote. That
was Saint John Crisostom.

Speaker 1 (01:37:54):
The Great.

Speaker 2 (01:37:55):
Moses himself testified against the early Israelites and foretold their future.
Rejected of God and his laws. He is worth quoting
at some length. Quote this is Moses. Do not think
in your heart after the Lord your God has cast
them out before you, saying, quote, because of my righteousness,
the Lord has brought me in to possess this land.

(01:38:17):
But it is because of the wickedness of these nations
that the Lord is driving them out before you. Therefore,
understand that the Lord your God is not giving you
this good land to possess because of your righteousness, for
you are a stiff necked people.

Speaker 1 (01:38:31):
Remember, do not.

Speaker 2 (01:38:33):
Forget how you provoked the Lord your God to wrath
in the wilderness. From the day that you departed from
the land of Egypt until you came to this place,
you have been rebellious against the Lord. Also in Horeb,
you provoke the Lord to wrath, so that the Lord
was angry enough with you to have destroyed you. When
I went up into the mountain to receive the tablets

(01:38:54):
of stone, the tablets of the Covenant, which the Lord
made with you. Then I stayed on the mountain forty
days and forty nights. Then the Lord said to me, Arise,
go down quickly from here, for your people, whom you
brought out of Egypt, have acted corruptly. They have quickly
turned aside from the way which I commanded them. They

(01:39:15):
have made themselves a molded image unquote.

Speaker 1 (01:39:20):
Furthermore, the Lord spoke.

Speaker 2 (01:39:21):
To me, saying, I have seen this people, and indeed
they are a stiff necked people. Let me alone that
I may destroy them and blot out their name from
under heaven, and I will make you a nation mightier
and greater than they.

Speaker 1 (01:39:36):
Next section Moses.

Speaker 2 (01:39:37):
So I turned and came down from the mountain, and
the mountain burned with fire, and the two tablets of
the Covenant were in my two hands. And I looked
and behold, and you had sinned against the Lord, your God.
You had made for yourselves a molded calf. You have
turned aside quickly from the way in which the Lord
had commanded you. Then I took the two tablets and
threw them out of my two hands, and broke them

(01:39:59):
before your eyes, and I fell down before the Lord.
As at the first forty days and forty nights, I
neither ate bread nor drank water, because all of your sin,
which you committed in doing wickedly, and the sight of
the Lord to provoke him to anger. For I was
afraid of the anger and hot displeasure which the Lord
was angry with you to destroy you. But the Lord

(01:40:20):
listened to me at that time, and the Lord was
very angry with Eron and would have destroyed him. So
I prayed for Erin also at the same time. Then
I took your sin the calf which you have made,
and burned it with fire, and crushed it and ground
it very small until it was fine as dust, and
I threw it into the brook that descended from the mountain.

(01:40:43):
Also at Taberah and Masa, and Kibrath and Hatvah, you
provoked the Lord to wrath. Likewise, when the Lord sent
you from Kadesh Barnea, saying, quote, go up and possess
the land which I've given to you. And then you
rebelled against the commandment of the Lord, your God. You

(01:41:04):
did not believe him or obey his voice. You have
been rebellious against the Lord from the day that I
knew you Deuteronomy nine four through twenty four Deuteronomy thirty one.
And the Lord said to Moses, behold, you will rest
with your fathers, and this people will rise and play
the harlot with the gods of the foreigners of this land,

(01:41:25):
where they go to be among them, and they will
forsake me and break my covenant which I have made
with them. Then my anger shall be aroused against them
in that day, and I will forsake them, and I
will hide my face from them, and they shall be devoured,
and many evils and trouble shall befall them, so that
they will say, in that day, have not these evils
come upon us, because our God is not among us.

(01:41:48):
And I will surely hide my face in that day
because of all the evil which they have done, and
that they have turned to other gods. Deuteronomy thirty one,
sixteen through eighteen. So it was when Moses had completed
writing the words of this law in a book, again
contravening the idea of the oral Torah. When they were finished,

(01:42:10):
that Moses commanded the Levites who bore the ark of
the covenant of the Lord, saying quote take this book
of the Law and put it beside the ark of
the Covenant of the Lord, your God, that it may
be there as a witness against you. For I know
your rebellion and your stiff neck. If today, while I
am yet alive with you, you have been rebellious against

(01:42:31):
the Lord, then how much more after my death. Gather
to me all the elders of your tribes and your officers,
that I may speak these words in their hearing, and
call heaven and earth to witness against them. For I
know that after my death you will become utterly corrupt
and turn aside from the way which I have commanded you.
And evil will befall you in the latter days, because

(01:42:53):
you will do evil in the side of the Lord,
to provoke him to anger throughout the works of your hands.
Deuteronomy thirty one one, verse twenty four through twenty nine.
The prophet Isaiah continued in vain of Moses, Here's the
prophet Isaiah. Here, oh heavens, and giver o earth, for

(01:43:13):
the Lord has spoken. I have nourished and brought up children,
and they have rebelled against me. The ox knows its owner,
the donkey its master's crib. But Israel does not know
My people. Do not consider a last sinful nation, a
people laden with iniquity, a brood of evildoers, children who
are corruptors. They have forsaken the Lord. They have provoked

(01:43:33):
to anger the Holy One of Israel. They have turned
away backward. Why should you be stricting again? You will
revolt more and more. The whole head is sick, and
the whole heart faints. From the soul of the foot,
even to the head, there is no soundness in it,
but wounds and bruises, putrefying sores. They have not been closed,

(01:43:56):
or bound up, or soothed with ointment. Isaiah one one
through seven continues, I have stretched out my hands all
day long to a rebellious people who walk in the
way that is not good according to their own thoughts,
of people who provoke me to anger continually to my face.
They are smoking my nostrils, a fire that.

Speaker 1 (01:44:14):
Burns all day. Behold, it is written before me.

Speaker 2 (01:44:17):
I will not keep silence, but will repay, even repay
into their bosom, your iniquities and the iniquities of your fathers, together,
says the Lord.

Speaker 1 (01:44:27):
Who have burned.

Speaker 2 (01:44:28):
Incense on the mountains and blasphem me on the hills.
Therefore I will measure their former work into their bosom,
thus says the Lord.

Speaker 1 (01:44:39):
But you are those who forsake the Lord.

Speaker 2 (01:44:41):
Who forget my holy mountain, who prepare a table for God,
and who finish a who furnish a drink offering for many.

Speaker 1 (01:44:50):
Therefore I will number.

Speaker 2 (01:44:52):
You for the sword, and you shall all bow down
to the slaughter, because when I called, you did not answer.
When I spoke, you did not hear, but did evil
before my eyes and chose that in which I do
not delight. Therefore says the Lord God. Behold, my servants
shall eat, but you shall be hungry. Behold, my servants

(01:45:15):
shall drink, but you shall be thirsty. Behold, my servants
shall rejoice, but you shall be ashamed. Behold, my servants
shall sing for joy of heart, but you shall cry
of sorrow of heart and wail for grief of spirit.
You shall leave your name as a curse to my chosen,
for the Lord God will slay you and call his
servants by another name, so that he who blesses himself

(01:45:38):
in the earth shall bless himself in the God of Truth,
and he who swears in the earth shall swear by
God of Truth, because the former troubles are forgotten, and
because they are hidden from My eyes Isaiah sixty five,
Verses two through sixteen. Thus do the Great Old Testament

(01:45:59):
prophets of the Hebrew Nation at large, not as God's chosen,
but as a curse to My chosen. Mister Spencer objects
to Saint John Crosostom referring to the Jews as fit
for slaughter. He refers that as anti Semitism in his
book on page forty three. But what about? But what

(01:46:19):
about does he object? When it is God himself through
the prophet Isaiah, who prophesies that quote, I will number
you for the sword, and you shall all bow down
to the slaughter? Is God an anti semi The core
faithful of the Old Testament Hebrew Nation, the remnant that
remained obedient to the commands of God despite the waywardness

(01:46:41):
of their compatriots. This the true Israel received their Messiah
in Jesus Christ during his earthly advent and became the
Early Church. Those who rejected God in the Old Testament
continued to cling to the tradition of men according to
the basic principles of the world, and not according to
Christ Colossians two eight, and became rabbinic Judaism with its

(01:47:05):
traditions based in the Talmud, which was put to writing
roughly between the second and fifth century AD. The Chosen God.
Surely one of the most deleterious notions in the false
Judaeo Christian cultural universe is that the Jews, as the
contemporary quote chosen people of God. The Hebrew nation the

(01:47:26):
descendants of Abraham, was indeed chosen by God as the
stewards of the divine law, and most importantly, the people
from whom the Messiah Jesus Christ was to come, As
the Lord himself affirmed, salvation is of the Jews John
four twenty two. But with the rejection of Jesus as Christ,
adherence to Judaism today throw away all doctrinal and soteriological

(01:47:48):
connection to the One True God, for the contemporary fiction
of tribal chosenness. As the Lord himself affirms, I am
the Way, the Truth, and the Life.

Speaker 1 (01:47:59):
No one comes through the Father except through Me John
fourteen six.

Speaker 2 (01:48:03):
As we have tried to clarify, it is the Orthodox
Church that is the chosen of God, the true Israel. Indeed,
the idea that adherence to Judaism to be differentiated from
Jews more generally, are the chosen of God is exponentially,
I'm sorry, exceptionally harmful to the welfare, certainly the spiritual

(01:48:26):
welfare of Judaic believers. In the general context of chosenness,
salvation is implied, rendering Judaic believers prone to the Protestant
idea that they are quote saved and not in need
of the salvafic power of Christ and his Church. The
Orthodox Christian understanding of chosenness, if anything, would reject the

(01:48:48):
idea of an earthly state of salvation beyond the susceptibility
of being lost or changed. Those whom we know to
be saved are the saints of the Church, who, having
run their earthly race with faith in Christ and the
cultivation of virtue through the grace of God, have received
their reward in paradise. Indeed, the whole Protestant heresy regarding

(01:49:09):
being quote saved and this life probably derived from the
Judaic notion of chosenness. We have so far referred to
the Judaic believers as adherents of the Jewish faith and
its different forms, Reformed, Conservative, Orthodox, though our emphasis has
been on the latter, but it is apparent that under

(01:49:29):
various historical circumstances, including today, the term Jew connotes more
than explicit religious affiliation. Saint Paul observes what it means
to truly be a Jew. I've talked about this in
my last stream of what is a Jew? That in
the twenty first century, really since the Enlightenment. It's a
polyphonic term, which is just the fancy way of saying

(01:49:51):
it's a word with multiple meanings. And so we're historically,
as we talked about in that stream, the term Jew
did not arise until the Second Exile, until the Second Temple.
It's after the Babylonian exile, the first one that because
the Persians saw that the tribe of Judah, which controlled

(01:50:11):
the Temple in Jerusalem, maintained its political, cultural, traditional and
religious values the most and differentiated them from the other
Persians or the other people during the exile. The other
tribes assimilated much more. And so because the tribe of
Judea that they did not assimilate in Persian they referred

(01:50:34):
to people practicing or the Israelites. Because we talked about
the first term is Hebrew, Abraham's referred to as a Hebrew,
not a Jew or an Israelite. With his grandson Jacob
would get the term Israel, and then Israelite is used
to refer to the people that are part of the
Israelite nation and the Twelve Tribes. But Jew, the term

(01:50:54):
Jew is not used until after the Babylonian exile, and
that has to do with the Persian influence of how
they just generally characterize all the people practicing this sort
of Judaic religion. Okay, So in the twenty first century,
jew now is a polyphonic term that can mean someone
who observes Tora.

Speaker 1 (01:51:14):
It could mean someone.

Speaker 2 (01:51:15):
Who has a Jewish mother. It could mean a reformed
intellectual Jew. It could mean someone who's adopted the cultural
practices a la Avanka Trump.

Speaker 1 (01:51:24):
She is a.

Speaker 2 (01:51:24):
Gentile who is converted through her marriage to Jared Kushner.
So she is she matrilineally Jewish. No, I don't even
know if she upholds the Torah full Eyah, but she
is Jewish.

Speaker 1 (01:51:37):
So to be a Jew in.

Speaker 2 (01:51:39):
The twenty first century, it's a polyphonic term that can
mean a lot of different things. And so here is
Saint Paul stating what it means to truly be a Jew,
he says, for he is not a Jew who is
one outwardly, nor is circumcision that which is outward in
the flesh. But he is a Jew who is won inwardly,

(01:51:59):
the circumcision that is of the heart, in the spirit,
not in the letter, whose praise is not from men
but from God Romans two twenty eight through twenty nine.
Though it may seem confusing in modern circumstances, for Saint Paul,
a true Jew is a devoted follower in his heart
of God and his Christ I e. A faithful Orthodox Christian.

(01:52:20):
The historical and social reality of the Christian era as
it developed, however, has been to designate followers of Christ
the True Messiah as quote Christians rather than Jews, while
the latter connotes adherents of the Torah and the Talmod,
which does not accept Jesus as the Christ. While bearing
in mind the words of Saint Paul, for our purposes,

(01:52:42):
we will accept the prevalent usage of quote Jew to
indicate followers of the Judaic religion. But instead the contemporary
meaning of Jew means more than that, and again is
a term that mister Spencer fails to define.

Speaker 1 (01:52:55):
What is a Jew?

Speaker 2 (01:52:57):
And so the ethnic component of Jewish identity is something
that has actually developed later. We talked about that in
the previous stream on what is a Jew, and that
the ethnic emphasis was not the same as it was
during really the time before Christ. They definitely had in
group preference and they definitely mat it with each other.

(01:53:19):
So obviously most Jews had Jewish mothers, but they didn't
have this genetic DNA understanding of what it meant to
be a Jew by genetic lineage that did not exist yet.

Speaker 1 (01:53:32):
So who is a Jew?

Speaker 2 (01:53:34):
The most salent example today of a definition of what
it means to be a Jew is that given by
the Jewish state itself, the State of Israel. The immigration
law of the Right to Return provides that for the
purposes of this application, a Jew means a person who
was born of a Jewish mother or who has become
converted to Judaism, and who is not a member of

(01:53:54):
another religion, which provides for the historic principle the matrilineal
descent mother is a Jew, then one is too, notwithstanding
whether one practices one's religion or not, as long as
one does not practice another. Thus, religion and spirituality blend
into ethnicity and genetics in the understanding of what it
means to be a Jew. Indeed, the authority of Chabad

(01:54:17):
Lubovich is the largest and fastest growing Jewish organization, affirms
that even after formal conversion to another religion, one still
remains a Jew. In short, one cannot stop being a Jew.
One cannot reject one's Jewishness. You cannot quit. No one
can throw you out, not even God. Jewishness then amounts

(01:54:37):
to an irrevocable heredity hereditary stamp, a concept strangely harmonious
with much anti Semitic thought that treats Jews in much
the same manner as a quote race rather than a
religious body, and one totally at odds with the Orthodox
Christian understanding of the effect the efficacy of baptism, which

(01:54:58):
implies a rebirth in crist in which one's former religious
identity has literally washed the way. The Israeli scholar Professor
Shlomo sand, wrestling with the question of what it means
to be a Jew on both personal and collective levels,
wrote an autobiographical book entitled How I Stopped Being a Jew?
Even while he rejects his status as a Jew. According

(01:55:20):
to Chabad in the State of Israel, Professor sand remains
a secular Jew. Secular Jews today, defined either by matrilinal
descent or by possessing a Jewish self consciousness abound. Anti Semitism,
as understood by mister Spencer, seems to apply just as
much to secular Jews, who may be otherwise unrecognizable, as

(01:55:43):
it does to Orthodox Jews, known for their religious practices
and instinctive dress and public appearance. Ironically, like many race
minded anti Semites, mister Spencer seems to argue with the
identification of Jewishness as racial slash hereditary when he observes quote.
This is a quote from Robert Spencer's book. Many of
the Jews who were forced to leave Israel I e.

(01:56:06):
The Holy Land over the centuries did of course settle
in various parts of Europe, but the claim that is
made is that they are native Europeans with no background
in the Middle East. The anti Semitic objective here is obvious.
If the Jews of today have no ethnic connection to
the ancient Jews of the Land of Israel, then they

(01:56:26):
have no right to return and claim to be the indigenous.

Speaker 1 (01:56:29):
People of the land. That's page three point fifty six.

Speaker 2 (01:56:36):
Now, Obviously, as I talked about in the last stream,
if you follow Arthur Kessler's thirteenth tribe theory, the Kazarian theory,
many people do not believe that the Ashkar Nazis are
explicitly European. Many people believe they're actually of a Turkish
mix with European Eastern European identity. But that's specifically regarding
Ashkana's identity.

Speaker 1 (01:56:56):
Okay.

Speaker 2 (01:56:57):
Next, if we put aside the notion that God is
a real estate broker, we proceed to observe that mister
Spencer sites on December twenty thirteen study by Bihar in
Human Biology that sought to refute the Kazar thesis, namely
that Ashconazi Jews of today are descendants of converts from

(01:57:17):
the ancient Kazar Kingdom and have little hereditary connection to
the ancient Israelites. According to mister Spencer, Osconazi Jews share
the greatest genetic ancestry with other Jewish populations and among
non Jewish populations with groups from Europe and the Middle East.
No particular similarity of Ashcanazi Jews to populations from the

(01:57:38):
Caucus is evident, particularly populations that most closely represent the
Kazar region, which is just an outright lie I've seen.

Speaker 1 (01:57:47):
Again, That's why I'm open.

Speaker 2 (01:57:49):
I lean a little bit more towards that the Kazarian
theory could be mixed with other theories about Jewish migration
into Europe. But I've also seen genetic Again, I don't
even who knows what the Internet everything can be so fabricated,
but I've seen genetic studies that argues there is a
considerable Turkish genetic component to Ashkenazi identity.

Speaker 1 (01:58:14):
So I don't know. That's where, you know, it's really
hard to prove the Kazar theory.

Speaker 2 (01:58:19):
It's interesting, it makes a lot of sense, it fits
historical timelines. But yeah, okay, the Jewish State, so the
logic runs. Today's Jews, defined under the Jewish State Law
of Return as those of matrilineal Jewish ancestry, are indeed Jews,
not because they practice Judaism or follow the laws of

(01:58:40):
God is given on Mount Sinai to Moses, but because
of their genetics. They have the undisputed right to live
in the State of Israel, whether they were born in
Tel Aviv, Moscow, or New York, Israel. In the early
twenty first century defines itself as a state of the
Jews and as the property of the Jewish people, in
other words, Jews living anywhere in the world, and not

(01:59:01):
a possession of the ensemble of Israeli citizens residing on
its soil, which is why it is appropriate to define
it as an ethnocracy rather than a democracy.

Speaker 1 (01:59:13):
Shlomo sands Indeed, in the.

Speaker 2 (01:59:18):
Jewish State, while there Israeli citizenship, there is no Israeli nationality,
only jew Arab and Druze, which the former naturally taking
pride of place in the world's only official Jewish state.
While Israeli non Jews are normally afforded the rights of
the Jewish counterparts, in practice they suffer various types of

(01:59:41):
discrimination quote. Most of the discrimination is, however, rather covert. Furthermore,
while it is legal but not legitimate in Israel to
reject publicly or act against Zionism, according to the nineteen
eighty five amendment of the election law, one may not
run for the Kanesset or an election slate which denies Israel.

Speaker 1 (02:00:02):
As the state of the Jewish people.

Speaker 2 (02:00:04):
To analogize the situation of the State of Israel for
the benefit of non Israelis and non Jews. Ilon Pappi
wrote in twenty seventeen, Imagine if in the UK or
the United States, Jewish citizens or Catholics for that matter,
were barred by law from living in certain villages, neighborhoods,
or maybe whole towns. How can such a situation be

(02:00:26):
reconciled with the notion of democracy. Thus, given the attitude
towards the two Palestinian groups, the refugees in the community
in Israel, the Jewish state cannot, by any stretch of
the imagination, be assumed to be a democracy. But the
most obvious challenge to that assumption is the ruthless Israeli
attitude towards the third Palestinian group, those who lived under

(02:00:48):
its direct and indirect rules since nineteen sixty seven in
East Jerusalem, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. For
the legal infrastructure put in place at the outset of
the nineteen sixty war, through the unquestioned absolute power of
the military inside the West Bank and outside the Gaza Strip,
to the humiliation of millions of Palestinians as a daily routine.

(02:01:10):
The quote only democracy unquote in the Middle East behaves
as a dictatorship of the worst kind that is from
his Pappy's book Ten Myths About Israel, page ninety one.

Speaker 1 (02:01:22):
House demolation, blocking.

Speaker 2 (02:01:24):
Up houses all in which all windows, doors, and access
ways are sealed with bricks and mortar, and other forms
of collective punishment are all too common in the territories
under Israeli occupation, in which the Palestinians are treated as
neither citizens of the Israeli state nor citizens under the
protection of the rules of war. Israeli settler vigilante groups

(02:01:47):
have been allowed by the government to harass vandalized properties
such as homes and farms, and even to shoot randomly
at Palestinians under occupation. Here's a quote from Pappy. Let's
take this in stages. Firstly, assassinations what Amnesti's report calls
unlawful killings. About fifteen thousand Palestinians had been killed unlawfully

(02:02:08):
by Israel since nineteen sixty seven. It's way more than
hat that was as of twenty fifteen.

Speaker 1 (02:02:14):
It's way more than that.

Speaker 2 (02:02:16):
Among them were two thousand children. Another feature of the
enlightened occupation is the imprisonment without trial. Every fifth Palestinian
in the West Bank and God's a Strip has undergone
such an experience. As for torture, the reliable website Middle
East Monitor published a harrowing article describing the two hundred
methods used by the Israelis to torture Palestinians. The list

(02:02:37):
is based on a UN report and a report from
the Israeli human rights organization be Teslam, among other methods,
and includes beatings, chaining prisoners to doors for hours, pouring
hot and cold water on them, pulling fingers apart, and
twisting testicles.

Speaker 1 (02:02:56):
Quote.

Speaker 2 (02:02:57):
For most Israelis, these counter arguments are relevant at best
and malicious at worst. Both Pappy and Spencer do seem
to agree that the Israeli Palestinian peace processes, which has
proceeded along hits torturous and halting wasts for decades, has
been disastrous, though, needless to say, for different reasons. And
I don't know if you guys saw some of the recent.

Speaker 1 (02:03:20):
Some of the recent.

Speaker 2 (02:03:20):
Controversy out of Israel, but there was a woman that
was working for the Israeli government and for one reason
or another, she actually released the video of the sodomizing
of a Palestinian man by multiple Israeli soldiers, and and

(02:03:41):
that she then like went like fled, She tried to
kill herself. Apparently that was what I was reading today.
She tried to kill herself, she fled. Israel then created
a manhunt for her that lasted for about a week,
and then they found her and she's now in prison.

Speaker 1 (02:03:58):
So imagine that in.

Speaker 2 (02:03:59):
Israel if you expose the fact that all the Israeli
you know will not all, but many instances, the IDF
has sodomized and tortured Palestinians. And this was an innocent
Palestinian man. This was not Hamas. Those soldiers will actually
be celebrated in Israeli culture. Meanwhile, the woman who actually

(02:04:21):
exposed what they were doing, she had to flee and
now she's arrested.

Speaker 1 (02:04:26):
So go figure, Go figure.

Speaker 2 (02:04:30):
Okay, So next section a struggle for the soul of
the Jewish people, turning to an especially relevant time in
the history of Russian and world Jewry, the Bolshevik Revolution
in Russia. Mister Spencer makes reference to the great Zionist
Winston Churchill's nineteen twenty essay and the London Illustrated Sunday
Herald Zionism versus Bolshevism may struggle for the soul of

(02:04:52):
the Jewish people After treating Bolshevik communism as somehow anti Semitic.
The Bolsheviks criminalized anti semitism on July twenty sixth, nineteen eighteen,
a week after they murdered the Russian Imperial family. Churchill's
essay remains a helpful document to understanding the social and
political dynamics surrounding the early years of Russian Communism. Mister

(02:05:16):
Spencer dismisses Churchill's main point, namely that Bolshevism was essentially
a Jewish phenomenon, as quote, simply expressing common assumptions of
the time, the idea that communism was a Jewish movement
and that those who engineered the Russian Revolution were all Jews.
That is a quote from Spencer on page three h six.
Now obviously quote all of the bolship revolutionaries were not Jews.

(02:05:41):
But whether Churchill was catering to the biases of his
readers remains a question that needs a serious answer. And
if he was doing so, from, where did those common
assumptions arise and why could there have been truth to them?

Speaker 1 (02:05:55):
How much truth?

Speaker 2 (02:05:56):
Mister Spencer seems willing to touch on these important questions,
but not to delve into them satisfactorily. Well, obviously we
know that the Bolshevik Revolution was majority jew I mean,
Putin went on record and said, what did he say? Like?
Eighty five percent of Bolshevism was a Jewish movement? Was

(02:06:17):
early Communism a substantially Jewish phenomenon? We will proceed with
Churchill's analysis, though a committed judaeo file. Had he been
writing today, Churchill would likely have been attracted the epithet
of anti semi by virtue of pointing out had what
was then the ongoing intra Jewish struggle at the time

(02:06:38):
between Zionism and Bolshevism, in which both political movements Jews
were heavily involved. Churchill's essay remains a document of great
historical interests written by one of the twentieth centuries leading statesmen.
Churchill very straightforwardly gives the lie to the claim that Jews,
excuse me, had little connection with the chaos and savagery

(02:07:01):
of early Communism that followed the toppling of the Russian
monarch in the October November nineteen seventeen Bolshevik Revolution. Again,
writing in nineteen twenty, Churchill sums up the situation in Russia. Quote,
and it may be well that this astounding race of

(02:07:24):
Jews may at the present time be in the actual
process of producing another system of morals and philosophy, i e.
Bolshevik communism, as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent, which is
not arrested, would shatter irritically all that Christianity had rendered possible.

(02:07:46):
It would almost seem as if the Gospel of Christ
and the Gospel of Antichrist were destined to originate among
the same people, and that this mystic and mysterious race
had been chosen for the supreme manifestations both of the
divine and the diabolical. Churchill proceeds to applaud the lives

(02:08:06):
and social contributions of what he calls national Jews, Jews
who express loyalty and patriotism to the various nations in
which they find residents. This at a time preceding the
birth of the modern state of Israel nineteen forty eight.
Then under the subheading International Jews, Churchill writes, quote, in
violent opposition to all this spear of Jewish effort rise

(02:08:29):
the schemes of the international Jews. This movement among the
Jews is not new from the days of Spartacus Vaishop,
you know Johann Adam Vaishop to those of Karl Marx
and down to Trotsky belacoun, Rosa Luxembourg and Emma Goldman.
This worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for

(02:08:51):
the recon reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development,
of envious malevolence and impossible quality has been steadily growing.
It played as a modern writer, Miss Nesta Webster, has
so aptly shown into a definitely recognizable part in the
tragedy of the French Revolution. Oh and it has been

(02:09:17):
the mainspring of every sub versus movement during the nineteenth century.
And now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from
the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America
have gripped the Russian people by their hair of their heads,
and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.

(02:09:39):
Churchill then proceeds under the subheading terrorist Jews. He says,
there is no need to exaggerate the part played in
the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about
the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most
part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great. It

(02:10:00):
probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin,
the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the
principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders.

Speaker 1 (02:10:12):
Excuse me.

Speaker 2 (02:10:13):
Thus Titcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal
subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Book, Karen
and Lunacharsky cannot be compared to the power of Trotsky
and Zenoviev, the director of the Red Citadel, or of

(02:10:34):
Crassen or Radick. All Jews in the Soviet institution, the
predominance of Jews is even more astonishing and all the prominent,
if not indeed the principle part of the system of
terrorism applied the extraordinary commissions of combating counter revolution has
been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses.
The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the

(02:10:57):
brief period of terror during the Belakun which Belakun ruled
in Hungary in nineteen nineteen. The same phenomenon has been
presented in Germany in nineteen eighteen and nineteen.

Speaker 1 (02:11:07):
Especially in Bavaria.

Speaker 2 (02:11:09):
So far as this madness has been allowed to prey
upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in
all these countries there are many non Jews, every whit
as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries. The
part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers
and the population is astonishing. Thus, the rt Hoan Winston,

(02:11:32):
Leonard Spencer Churchill and February nineteen twenty statesmen and future
Prime Minister of Great Britain It's empire on the struggle
for the soul of the Jewish people Jews in Bolshevism.
While there has been a great tendency in contemporary circles
to whitewash the outstanding role Jews played in early communism
and its enormous crimes, references to earlier works and primary

(02:11:55):
source materials.

Speaker 1 (02:11:56):
Belie the reality.

Speaker 2 (02:11:57):
Indeed, even in America, the nineteen twenty may be thought
of as Jewish Communism's golden age. One might also reflect
on the twentieth century itself as the Jewish Century, a
time during which emancipated Jews came both to participate in,
as well as to dominate, many aspects of social, cultural,
and political life. But it was in the higher reaches

(02:12:18):
of the Russian Communist Party in government that Jewish dominance
was so striking. Douglas Reed, Times of London correspondent writes, quote,
the Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party, which wielded the
supreme power, contained three Russians and nine Jews. The body
the next body in importance, the Central Committee of the
Executive Commission or Secret Police, comprised of forty two Jews

(02:12:41):
and nineteen Russians, Let's Georgians and others. The Council of
People's Commissars consisted of seventeen Jews and five others. The
Moscow Cheka, the secret Police, was formed of twenty three
Jews and thirteen others. Among the names of the five
hundred and fifty six high officials of the Bolshevik State
officially publicis.

Speaker 1 (02:13:00):
In nineteen eighteen and nineteen nineteen.

Speaker 2 (02:13:03):
Were four hundred and fifty eight Jews and one hundred
and eight others. Among the central committees of small supposedly
socialist or non communist parties were fifty five Jews and
six others. Russian and Soviet historian Richard Pipes says, quote,
Jews undeniably played in the Bolshviik Party in the early

(02:13:23):
Soviet apparatus, a role disportionate to their share of the population.
The number of Jews active in communism in Russia and
abroad was striking and Hungary, for example, they furnished ninety
five percent of the leading figures in Belacoon's dictatorship. They
also were disproportionately represented among the communists in Germany and
Austria during the revolutionary upheavals in the nineteen eighteen through

(02:13:45):
nineteen twenty three and in the apparatus of the Communists International.
In a white paper to the British Foreign Secretary Arthur
belfour stated September seventeenth, nineteen eighteen, Sir Mansvelt wrote, quote,
the question who governs Russia receives a categorical reply in

(02:14:06):
the simple enumeration of the responsible officials and their irresponsible
Soviet government. That data contained in this pamphlet has been
carefully taken from the Bolshevist official organs. The fundamental fact
is incontestable. The Soviet bureaucracy is almost entirely in the
hands of Jews and Jewishes, while the number of Russians

(02:14:27):
who participate in the government of the Soviets is ridiculously small,
it is impossible to evade this fact, which stands as
a solemn warning to countries and states which claim to
be Christian and which believe in national modes of existence
and contradiction with the unlimited internationalism one might today's say globalization,
in which the Jewish nation is in the dominant power.

(02:14:51):
Is important to note that during those chaotic, bloody years
of early Communism and Civil War, many Jews suffered the
fate of so many Russian Christians and exile. The Russian
Revolution liberated the largest Jewish community in the world, it
also opened the floodgates for the greatest massacre of Jews
before the Second World War. Amid the Civil War and
its aftermath in nineteen eighteen through twenty one, once the

(02:15:14):
Bolshevik rule was then consolidated, Jews entered into nearly every
sphere of Russian life, while in time much of the
singular richness of Jewish cultural life in Russia was flattened
eventually obliterated. Indeed, Communism, like so many revolutions, would devour
its own children in time, but this in no way
minimizes the central role Jews played in the crimes of

(02:15:36):
early Communism, and indeed there was a serious reaction to
Jewish domination of the Communist Party and secret security apparatus
in due course, the most extreme example of which was
the rise of Adolph Hitler's National Socialist Workers Party in Germany,
which leveraged politically the scepter of Jewish Bolshevism to attain
supreme political power, with horrifyingly destructive results for both the

(02:15:58):
enemies and the constituents of the Third Reich. As an aside,
when people today speak of Russian anti Semitism in the past,
they often failed to realize that most such episodes, such
as the programs that followed the assassination of Tsar Alexander
the Second in March of eighteen eighty one that killed

(02:16:18):
forty Jews, the infamous Kishinev program in April nineteen oh
three that killed forty nine and damaged one thousand and
five hundred Jewish homes, and the nineteen oh five program
in Odessa, Ukraine that killed between four hundred and eight
hundred Jews, as well as the programs committed during the
Civil War, occurred outside the boundaries with temporary Russia and

(02:16:39):
were committed prepondently by non Russian nationalities Alexander Soljahnitsen and Bolshevism.
I gotta take a drink of water. Guys smashed that
like I have been.

Speaker 1 (02:16:54):
Reading for a minute.

Speaker 2 (02:16:55):
Here, you guys appreciate me making content like this, taking
the risk with the tosh show some appreciation with the
superchat over on Dono chat stream labs or YouTube. I'm
going to finish this article and then I'll get I'll
come back and address all the super chats one by one.

(02:17:16):
All right, A significant let me see real quick, all right,
A significant emission from anti Semitism is that of Alexander
Soljiannistsan's tremendous work on the history of Jews and Russia
since the nineteen or since the seventeen ninety five partition
of Poland, and a book called two Hundred Years Together.

(02:17:37):
Mister Spencer is willing to make use of Soljiernissan's famous quote.
That quote, gradually it was disclosed to me that the
line separating good and evil passes not through states, not
between classes, not between political parties either, but right through
every human heart and through all human hearts. Yet he
fails to mention even the existence of the great Man's

(02:17:58):
actual major contribution to the whole question of the history
of Jewish life in Russia and the Soviet Union, soljion
Nisen's scholarship strongly militates against the thrust of anti Semitism,
which is that anti Semitism is exclusively the result of
irrational hatred of the past of non Jews, both individually

(02:18:19):
and collectively, and has absolutely nothing to do with the
religious or social fiction contributed by Judaic beliefs and actions themselves.
As a testament to the persistent difficulty in examining Judaism
and Jewish history, frankly and openly, the Nobel Prize winner
soljion Nisen was unable to get Two Hundred Years Together,

(02:18:39):
originally printed in Russian in two thousand and two, published
in English during his lifetime. An English translation appeared online
in twenty eighteen, which has been this critic's source. When
Alexander Soljiannisen began to work on a book called two
Hundred Years Together, he was criticized for what touching this
taboo issue. His own comments to the press didn't help

(02:19:03):
the matter, claiming two thirds of the Cheka the secret
police in Ukraine were Jewish. I will always differentiate between
layers of Jews. One layer rushed headfirst to the revolution, another,
to the contrary, was trying to stand back. The Jewish
subject for a long time was considered prohibited. Lest one
consider Alexander Soljannitsen, the modern prophet and Nobel laureate, to

(02:19:24):
have been guilty of anti Semitic impulses, it is worth
recalling that he was married to a Jewish wife, with
whom he raised their sons as Jews. While many ordinary
Jews did not participate directly in the destruction and murders
of the early Bolshevik regime, a significantly disproportionate number of

(02:19:45):
the Jewish intellectual class did, and, as Soljion Knitsen powerfully
describes in a book of nearly eight hundred pages and
more than three hundred footnote three hundred thousand, I'm sorry,
more than three thousand footnotes, the early Communist regime in
Russia could ever have achieved its brutal scope and zenith
without the active participation of Russian.

Speaker 1 (02:20:05):
And international Jewry.

Speaker 2 (02:20:07):
The Jewish population in its mass showed a suspicious and
even hostile attitude towards the Bolsheviks, but when as a
result of the revolution it had acquired complete freedom, which
fostered a real expansion of Jewish activity in the political,
social and cultural spheres, a well organized activity. To boot,
it did nothing to prevent the Bolshevik Jews from occupying

(02:20:29):
the key positions, and these made an exceedingly cruel use
of this new power fallen into their hands. From the
forties of the twentieth century onwards, the Communists rule broke
broke with international Judaism. Jews and Communists became embarrassed and afraid,
and they preferred to stay quiet and conceal their strong
participation of Jews in the Communist revolution. However, the inclinations

(02:20:52):
to remember and name the phenomenon were described by the
Jews themselves as purely anti Semitic intentions. Tween seventies and
the nineteen eighties, under the pressure of new revelations, the
vision of the revolutionary years was adjusted. A considerable number
of voices were heard publicly. Thus, the poet now whom

(02:21:13):
Kurazvin wrote quote, if we make the participation of the
Jews and the revolution at taboo subject, we can no
longer talk about the revolution at all. There was a
time when the pride of this participation was even prized.
The Jews took part in the revolution and in abnormally
high proportions. M Agirski wrote on his part, quote the

(02:21:33):
participation of the Jews and the Revolution in the Civil
War has not been limited to a very active engagement
in the state apparatus. It has been infinitely wider. Similarly,
the Israeli socialists Zykina nikov I don't know at the
beginning of the revolution the Jews served as the foundation

(02:21:55):
of the new regime, but there were also many Jewish
writers who up to the day either deny the Jews
contribution of Bolshevism or even reject the idea rashly or
this is the most frequent, consider it only reluctantly. However,
the fact is proven Jewish renegades have long been leaders
in the Bolshevik Party, heading the Red Army.

Speaker 1 (02:22:19):
In the Two Capitals.

Speaker 2 (02:22:22):
And later Lazar Shatskin, who also headed the International Communist
Youth all right, or next section the Bolsheviks willing executioners.
The fact that the Bolsheviks went to great links to
fight any anti Semitic reaction to their increasingly brutal rule,
which they regarded as a grave threat, again going so

(02:22:46):
far as to make anti Semitism actually illegal. Sojial Nitsen
estimates that some sixty six million Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians and
other nationalities within the Soviet Union perish during the Russian
Civil War of nineteen six seventeen to nineteen twenty three
and the first decades of communism during both its Lenen
Trotskyists and Stalinist years. Twenty seven million Soviet citizens, mostly Russians,

(02:23:11):
would perish during the German invasion and World War II.
Professor Kevin McDonald gives a lower total figure of death,
but notes quote the Soviet government killed over twenty million
of its own citizens, the vast majority in the first
twenty five years of existence. During the height of Jewish power,
it was a quote state against its people, mounting murderous

(02:23:34):
campaigns of collective punishment, usually involving deportation or for starvation
against a great many ethnic groups. Although individual Jews were
caught up in the Bolshevik violence, Jews were not targeted
as a.

Speaker 1 (02:23:45):
Group after while.

Speaker 2 (02:23:49):
After Stalin's purges in nineteen thirty seven to thirty eight,
Jewish representation in the Communist Party in its iniquities iniquitous
security services declined until that time. For roughly the first
twenty years of its history, it may be said that
Soviet Communism possessed a strongly Jewish hue. Still, Jews were
highly overrepresented in positions of economic and political power, as

(02:24:12):
well as cultural influence, at least into the nineteen forties.
Particularly bloody were the Bolshevik crimes against the Russian Orthodox Church,
from hierarchs and clergy to ordinary Orthodox believers, millions of
whom were tortured to death, shot outright, or sent to
their deaths in the gulags sold abroad. Cathedrals were dynamited.

(02:24:35):
When one reflects on the staggering death toll under Jewish
communism in the virtual silence on the subject in modern
mass media versus the countless books, documentaries, and feature films
made about the Holocaust, one becomes cognizant of an enormous
contemporary cultural and intellectual disconnect. Political and cultural crimes committed

(02:24:56):
by Jewish Bolsheviks against the Russian population have been idly documented,
not least by the journalist Robert Wilton, Russian correspondent to
the Times of London during the Bolshevik takeover and the
years of the First World War leading up to it,
in his book Russia's Agony the Last Days of the Ramanovs,
Wilton and his outstanding reporting have today been thrown on

(02:25:19):
the ash heap of anti Semitism, thus discarding some of
the most powerful eyewitness testimony to the events that shaped
the earliest communist Soviet union. He describes Jewish involvement in
the November nineteen seventeen Bolshevik takeover of the provincial government,
the subsequent systematic persecution and killing of counter revolutionaries, namely

(02:25:40):
anyone suspected of Monarchia's sympathies or Christian faith during the
years of the Red Terror, the savage murder of the
Imperial family in nineteen eighteen. In the early years of
Civil War quote taken according to numbers of the Russian population,
the Jews represented one in ten. Among the commissars that
rule Bolshevik Russia, they are nine in ten. If anything,

(02:26:03):
the proportion of Jews is still greater. Wilton goes out
of his way to identify Jews involved in Bolshvilism as
pseudo Jews, i e. Jews who publicly had, for the
most part shed their religious sympathies and accepted the official
atheism of the new regime, while culturally and in private
retaining their Jewish self consciousness, and would continue to be

(02:26:23):
identified as Jews according to the principle of familial descent,
as still promulgated by the State of Israel and again,
ironically by many anti Semites. To borrow a phrase, one
might say that many Jews in Russia and from all
over the world who flocked to the nascent Bolshevik regime,
who lent themselves to the gruesome machinery of early Communism,

(02:26:44):
composed the Bolsheviks willing executioners, and the words of author
Daniel Jonah Goldhagen describing what he believed as the complicit
attitude of the German population through the crimes of the
Third Reich and willingly participated in what are probably the
greatest crimes in history committed against the Orthodox Christian population.

(02:27:04):
On June ninth, nineteen nineteen, Captain Montgomery, schuler of the
American Expeditionary Forces to Russia, telegram from Vladislak Vladistok on
the makeup of the presiding Soviet government. There were three
hundred and eighty four commissars, including two Negros, thirteen Russians,
fifteen Chinamen twenty two Armdians and more than three hundred Jews.

(02:27:29):
Of the latter number, two hundred and sixty four had
come to Russia from the United United States since the
downfall of the Imperial Government. How to summarize Jewish involvement
in the early and early communism, we have here concentrated
on the Bolsheviks, the party that emerged victorious in the
political struggle, even while the more socialist revivals the Mensheviks

(02:27:53):
were overwhelming overwhelmingly Jewish as well. Seth Franceman, writing in
the Jerusalem Post a century after the Bolshevik coup, observed
that many Jews quote ended up being murdered by the
system they helped create. Unquote, he continued, this is a
quote with one hundred years of hindsight, it is still

(02:28:14):
difficult to understand what attracted so many Jews to communism
in the Russian Empire. Were their actions infused with Jewishness,
a sense of Jewish mission like that of tikan Olam
meaning roughly to repair the world and light unto the
nations values we hear about today, or where their action
is strictly pragmatic. As a minority group struggling to be

(02:28:35):
part of a larger society. The answer lies somewhere in
the middle. Mister Frantzman is onto something. Their actions were
infused with Jewishness, a sense of Jewish mission like that
of tikan Olam. The reason that so many culturally adrift
Jews gravitated to utopian communism was due to the cultural
hangover of worldly Messianism that imbues their erstwhile faith. Rabbinic

(02:29:00):
Judaism has for centuries envisioned a conquering Messiah, the vein
of King David or Simon bar Kokba, the leader of
the disasters of volt against Rome in one th two
through one thirty six AD, who would emerge to crush
the enemies of Jewry and usher in a new realm
of peace, prosperity, and global harmony with the Jews and

(02:29:21):
pride of place. Communism was a secularized version of Judaic
Messianism conceived by the covert Jew Karl Marx, which, like
all such efforts since the time of Bar Kokba, would
end in catastrophe, both for its immediate Christian victims as
well as for its Jewish perpetrators. The current efforts to
bring about a one world order through globalization are yet

(02:29:44):
other variations on a theme. Mister Spencer's own answer regarding
Jewish involvement in Russia and international Communism comes across as
remarkably facile. It must be granted that many Jews, particularly
in Russia, did join the ranks of the Communists, hoping
that they would create a society in which they would
be relieved of the second class status and periodic programs

(02:30:07):
they had suffered under the rule.

Speaker 1 (02:30:09):
Of the Csars.

Speaker 2 (02:30:10):
This was far, however, from establishing that Bolshevism was a
Jewish movement devised in order to advance Jewish aims, any
more than that the preponderance of Black Americans in the
National Basketball Association means that professional basketball is an inherently
black enterprise. A culture that values learning and scholarship will
fill the ranks of movements that are intellectual in scope

(02:30:31):
or that require intellectual labor. And that is true not
just in politics, but in numerous other fields as well.
That is a quote from Robert Spencer trying to explain
why there is Jewish overrepresentation murderous communism versus professional basketball.
According to mister Spencer, because Jewish cultural values are culture

(02:30:54):
values learning and scholarship, it was natural for so many
Jews become party official commissars, agents and secret police informers
and general executioners of so many innocent Russian Christians and
the hopes of creating a better society.

Speaker 1 (02:31:09):
Is that really what he would have us to believe.

Speaker 2 (02:31:11):
Jewish culture logically produces.

Speaker 1 (02:31:16):
Jews in contemporary life.

Speaker 2 (02:31:18):
Mister Spencer provides a similar apologia for Jewish domination in
other areas of contemporary life. Just as Jews became bankers
and financers when the Roman Catholic Church's prohibition on usury
closed those fields to Catholics, so also the wider societies
disdained for pornography tended to make it a field to

(02:31:40):
which those who were marginalized and often treated as outcasts gravitated,
and some Jews got involved in it. The Jews culturally
cultivated creativity and dynamism led to their being despised and
relegated as the margins of society. So that's Robert Spencer
now regarding pornography. As I mentioned earlier, don't forget Al Goldstein,

(02:32:00):
the for publisher of Screw, the pornographic sex newspaper, and
he has the famous quote. As I told you guys
earlier and which asked why Jews are so overly represented
in the porn industry. He answered, the only reason that
Jews are in the porn or in pornography is that

(02:32:21):
we think that christ sucks, Catholicism sucks. We don't believe
in authoritarianism. Interestingly enough, they believe in Bolshevism. Pornography thus
becomes a way of defiling Christian culture, and as it
penetrates into the very heart of the American mainstream and
is no doubt consumed by those same very wasp, its
subversive character becomes more charged.

Speaker 1 (02:32:44):
Interesting. Interesting.

Speaker 2 (02:32:47):
It's not the Jews fault that they slaughtered millions of
Russian Christians, or revolutionary Bolsheviks became so adapt that usury
became media barons, rose to the heights behind the scenes
of political control and went into pornography. Rather, it was
the fault of Christian society and the result of the
jews own superior ethic. With respect to being quote well

(02:33:11):
represented in the financial sphere, Jews were just quote making
lemonade out of lemons. According to Robert Spencer. This is
a quote from Robert Spencer's book. If there are Jews
at high levels of the pornography industry. This is not
because they are Jews executing some subversive Jewish agenda quote
again opposite of what al Goldstein said, but because in

(02:33:33):
that field, as in so many others, people who are intelligent, capable, motivated,
and driven, all qualities that Jewish culture generally encourages.

Speaker 1 (02:33:41):
Tend to rise to the top.

Speaker 2 (02:33:48):
It is clearly not acceptable by mister Spencer's standards to
criticize Jewish culture.

Speaker 1 (02:33:52):
That would amount to anti Semitism. But if it's just.

Speaker 2 (02:33:56):
Fine to praise it, but it is just fine to
praise it to the heavens, even in the context of
one of our greatest moral social blights, namely industrial scare
industrial scale pornography. Jewish pornographic entrepreneurs are not scarce on
the ground from the god hating al Goldstein, whom mister
Spencer describes as seeing himself as a victim of anti

(02:34:20):
Jewish prejudice and sees working in pornography as a way
to strike back to the Rabbi Attorney Solomon Friedman, the
head of Alo, the parent company of Pornhub. Of course,
Rabbi Friedman does not appear to see his efforts.

Speaker 1 (02:34:35):
As destructive at all.

Speaker 2 (02:34:36):
Jews are well represented in contemporary pornography. Nathan Abrams has
written an interesting article, Jews in the American porn industry
a disproportionate role in adult entertainment, the title of which
pretty much sums it up. With regard to possible Talmudic
sanction of child abuse, mister Spencer asked about pedophilia in
child trafficking, which, of course he denies. Whether elements of

(02:34:59):
the Talmud prem child abuse is open to question, but
certain contemporary problems in the Jewish state are not exactly
reassuring of this source. For example, how Jewish American pedophiles
hide from justice in Israel apparently a widespread problem. Tens
of thousands of pedophiles operate.

Speaker 1 (02:35:16):
In Israel every year.

Speaker 2 (02:35:18):
And another article, Israel Becoming a Refuge for pedophiles warns
advocates for child sex abuse victims apparently quote there are
there may be a significantly higher proportion of cases in
the ultra Orthodox community. Mister Spencer affirms the obvious when
he writes, quote there are criminals and perverts in all

(02:35:39):
cultures and groups obvious, but he denies that there is
anything peculiar to Jewish culture that manifests quote a worldwide
Jewish imperative to subvert and destroy non Jewish society. That,
of course, would be a difficult thing to establish beyond
a reasonable doubt. Though we have certainly seen that Judaism's
holiest book, the Babylonian Talmud, is scurious anti Christian, that

(02:36:01):
Rabbinic Judaism takes pride in the judicial murder of Christianity's
holiest person, That Jews were overwhelming represented and murderous anti
Christian Bolshevism, the crimes of which, in absolute numbers dwarf
even those of the criminal German national socialists. The Jews
have quoted a disproportionate role in the contemporary pornography industry.

(02:36:22):
One is even tempted to reference the significant roles Jews
played in organized crime, Jewish American mobsters referenced to Jewish
American mobsters and organized crime figures Jews in Christian society.

Speaker 1 (02:36:34):
Doctor E.

Speaker 2 (02:36:35):
Michael Jones, PhD, who may be found at culturewars dot
com as well as among the Anti Defamation League's greatest hits,
proffers an interesting theory in his immense book, The Jewish
Revolutionary Spirit and its Impact on World History.

Speaker 1 (02:36:50):
I do have that book is right over there. No,
I have it right here.

Speaker 2 (02:37:01):
This is the book that he's referencing, if anybody is interested.

Speaker 6 (02:37:12):
Okay, which much more accords with the bloody historical record
of Jewish communism and the culturally subversive nature of Jewish
involvement in pornography and other anti Christian undertaking.

Speaker 2 (02:37:31):
Mister Spencer gives doctor Jones a modest hearing in his book.
For example, this is Robert Spencer writing about E. Michael
Jones rooted in nothing. Radical Jews frequently seek to make
others equally rootless by tearing down the religious, national, communal,
and traditional allegiances. Such Jews carry on the traditional Jewish

(02:37:51):
hatred of false gods, including one supposes Christian idolators, but
without offering anything. Oh, this is him quoting E. Michael
Jones in his book, without offering anything to replace the
scorned allegiances. Rather, the most important result of the domination
of non Jewish Jews in these fields is their war

(02:38:13):
on traditional values. Porn is just one expression of this
rebellion against standards, against the disciplined life of obedience to
Torah that makes a Jew living Judaism. That was Jones,
as quoted in Spencer's book Anti Semitism. When Jews became
and slash, or become emancipated from the straight jacket of

(02:38:34):
rabbinic Judaism without converting to another faith such as Christianity,
they take with them into the larger Christian society, a
rootlessness that many of them seek to translate to the
larger culture. Should this be so surprising? Mister Spencer sees
it as a fiction, I'm sorry, as a function of
Jewish cultural superiority. Some traditional Christians, such as Jones, see

(02:38:58):
it as a cultural subversion. To a great extent, they
are in agreement. It is merely a question of perspective.
If the rabbis were indeed proud of killing Jesus Christ,
as doctor Schaeffers told us, why should not their cultural
errors be inclined towards destroying a culture based in his name.
Such a lingering antipathy toward Christian culture may not constitute

(02:39:21):
a massive, insidious Jewish plot, but a nonetheless real social
and cultural antagonism for what remains in Christian society. Mister
Spencer himself remarks on the glee demonstrated by multiple contemporary
rabbis who rejoice in the ongoing destruction and Islamization of
Christian Europe. Jews should rejoice in the fact that Christian

(02:39:43):
Europe is losing its identity as a punishment for what
it did to us. For hundreds of years were while
we were in exile. Now Europe is losing its identity
in favor of another people and another religion, and there
will be no remnants in survivors from the purity of Christianity,
which shed a lot of blood. It won't be able

(02:40:04):
to atone. For Rabbi Buruch Frati of why net News
on November eleventh, twenty twelve, as quoted and Robert Spencer's
anti Semitism, the Messiah will only come when eat them Europe.
Christianity has totally fallen. So I ask you, is it

(02:40:25):
good news that Muslims are invading Europe. It's excellent news.

Speaker 1 (02:40:29):
It means the coming of the Messiah.

Speaker 2 (02:40:31):
Excellent news. That's Rabbi David.

Speaker 1 (02:40:34):
Toy Toitu on YouTube.

Speaker 2 (02:40:38):
Mister Spencer hastens to point out that the statement of
a handful of individuals, however, does not make for a
Jewish conspiracy, which is logically undeniable, but the cultural antipathy
to what remains of Christian Europe is palpable. Mister Spencer
points to one other rabbi, David Rosen, who does not

(02:40:58):
support his colleague sentiments, proving evidently that rabbis can disagree.
It is evident, however, that as Europe grows more Islamic
due to immigration and higher birth rates among Muslim families,
the situation for both Jews and Christians in Europe will
continue to deteriorate. As mister Spencer has argued on various occasions,
but one beneficiary is surely the Zionist movement and his

(02:41:21):
notion that Jews in general should immigrate to the State
of Israel. As Europe grows more dangerous for Jews, fleeing
to the Jewish state grows relatively attractive, a significant point
that mister Spencer fails to bring up when it comes
to analyzing possible Jewish motivations for anti Christian social and
political behavior. A major lacuna in mister Spencer's book is

(02:41:42):
the absence of evolutionary psychologists Professor Kevin MacDonald, who approaches
Jewish collective behavior clinically from a group evolutionary perspective, and
whom we have had occasion to mention his well researched
work such as A People That Shall Dwell Alone, Judaism
as a group, evolutionary strategy, separation its discontents, toward an

(02:42:03):
evolutionary theory of anti Semitism, the culture of critique, and
evolutionary analysis of Jewish involvement in the twentieth century, intellectual
and political movements, understanding Jewish influence, and others all mister
Spencer sees fit to ignore. Professor MacDonald points out that
the broad Jewish support for multiculturalism, with important exceptions such

(02:42:24):
as the relatively new phenomenon of Jewish neo conservatism, functionally
undermines the hitherto dominant Christian culture, while providing the Jewish
minority with its greater cultural cohesion, social and political advantages.
To take a crucial example that of raising children. Moreover,
traditional Western supports for high investment parenting were embedded in

(02:42:48):
Christian religious ideology, and I suppose are difficult to achieve
in a post religious environment. Nevertheless, of Pert Horitz notes
it is in fact the case that Jewish intellectuals, Jewish
organizations like the AJA Congress, and Jewish dominated organizations such
as the ACLU have ridiculed Christian religious beliefs attempted to

(02:43:10):
undermine the strength of Christianity or have led the fight
for lifting restrictions on pornography. Further, we have seen that
psychoanalysis of a as a Jewish dominated intellectual movement has
been a central component of this war on Gentile cultural
supports for high investment parenting. Whereas Jews, because of their

(02:43:32):
powerful genetically influenced propensities for intelligence and high investment parenting,
have been able to thrive within this cultural maleu, other
sectors of the society have not. The result has been
a widening gulf between the cultural successes of Jews and Gentiles,
and a disaster for the society as a whole. That
is doctor MacDonald in his book The Culture of Critique,

(02:43:55):
page three, twenty eight. There is little gainsaying Professor mc
donald's broad observations other significant works of contemporary This is
also Doctor MacDonald. Other significant works of contemporary scholarship on
Judaism are similarly absent from anti Semitism or no, I'm
sorry this is next paragraph, for example, references to the

(02:44:19):
works of Michael Hoffman, including Judaism, Strange Gods, his massive
and exhaustively documented Judaism discovered and Adolf Hitler, enemy of
the German people, nowhere appear in its pages. While mister
Spencer mentions various translations of the Talmud into languages accessible
to Christian Europeans over the centuries and the ensuing controversies,

(02:44:40):
he emits the most striking example, namely that Johann Andreas
Eisenmenger Judaism unmasked, published and suppressed in the early eighteenth
century in Frankfurt. Perhaps because Eisenminger had mastered Hebrew Aramaic
in Yiddish and thus was able to provide a highly
scholarly critique of the Talmud as a vehicle for the

(02:45:02):
conversion of Jews to Christianity, mister Spencer chose not to
engage him. There is also no mention in anti Semitism
of the Judaic Kabbalah see Michael Hoffman and Judaism discovered,
anti Semitism in contemporary Jewish State turning to Zionism in
the Jewish State. Mister Spencer is especially worried about the

(02:45:26):
rise of anti Semitic sentiments since the Hamas attack on
the State of Israel October seventh, twenty twenty three. Mister
Spencer takes to task. For example, quote conservative journalist Elijah
Schaeffer for condemning the attack on the following day, but
adding context one, what Hamas did was evil. What Israel

(02:45:47):
is doing to the Palestinians is evil. Both thank each
other other terrorists. One is in an open air prison.
Of course, most of the examples of anti Semitism provided
by mister Spencer are from Islamic active who, as mister
Spencer would hasten to point out, are are in are

(02:46:08):
inevitably anti Semitic by virtue of being Muslims. He proceeds
to observe, one would say accurately that Jews and Israel
occupy an outsized proportion of the world's attention, and a
great deal of attention is negative. And in an apparently
related vein, Christians warned me that ancient prophecies held that

(02:46:31):
the Antichrist would arise from modern day Israel Antichrist or conversely,
the Judaic Messiah will most likely arise from within the
region of the old Roman Empire, namely the euro Mediterranean basin,
and then move his capital j Jerusalem. Indeed, Churchill got
to the heart of the matter when he opened his
article Zionism versus Bolshevism, with the words some people like

(02:46:55):
Jews and some people did not, but no thoughtful man
can doubt that they are, beyond all question, the most
formidable and the most remarkable race which has ever appeared
in the world. In other words, Jews do and have
for centuries, though especially now that there exists an explicit
Jewish state, played an outsized role in world affairs, far

(02:47:16):
exceeding their relatively small numbers. Churchill can see. In fact,
Spencer can two. Though he laments that quote, a very
great deal of that attention is negative. There are two
logical possibilities for that negative attention. First, that the rest
of the world labors under the disease of a rational
Jew hatred or what Spencer refers to as anti Semitism.

(02:47:39):
Or two, that Jews in the State of Israel are
doing things that warrant negative attention. And the two, of
course are not mutually exclusive. Surely there are inverterate anti
Semites out there, especially in the Islamic world. But could
possibly the State of Israel be acting badly itself?

Speaker 1 (02:47:58):
Is it anti semitic to entertain the idea?

Speaker 2 (02:48:02):
As of the publication of his book, mister Spencer regards
Israeli military activity posts October seventh, twenty twenty three as
quote defensive. The State of Israel was attacked, it responded,
and will continue to respond. One might analogize the situation
to the surprise Japanese attack of December seventh, nineteen forty

(02:48:23):
one against the US, or to the lunatic declaration of
war by Germany a few days later in the ensuing
American allied response. Surely the United States was acting defensively. Surely, yes,
though one can wonder about the subsequent targeting of civilians
and civilian infrastructure that claimed the lives of millions of

(02:48:44):
non combatant Japanese and Germans. At the time, it seemed
all in a good cause. But with hindsight one hesitates
to affirm that destroying German culture in the center of
Dresden with incendiaries in nineteen forty five, or vaporizing the
Japanese Christian center of Nagasaki in the same year, we're
categorically good. Similarly, one can raise questions at least about

(02:49:08):
the behavior of the State of Israel before and after
October seventh, twenty twenty three. Mister Spencer refers to the
State of Israel as the most hated state. In his
title to chapter twelve, we ask why is it so hated?
Is the entire world implacably anti Semitic? Or are actions

(02:49:28):
of the State of Israel in some way driving negative
perceptions of it? Could not the latter be at least
somewhat true. Mister Spencer does not seem to think so.
He marches out of a small parade of left wing
politicians perennial critics of the Jewish state to bolster his case.
He does not engage more serious criticism, like that of

(02:49:50):
the American Jewish journalist Max Blumenthal, for example, who questioned
the accepted narrative of October seventh and impressive documentary Atrocity inc.
Mister Spencer also faults the previous Biden administration for inefficient
support for Israeli policies in Gaza, even while Biden consistently

(02:50:11):
gave the State of Israel just about everything it wanted
in terms of munitions, money, and material as well as
vetoing you in Security Council resolutions against it one hundred
times Biden supported Israel. What more was American poly supposed
to do give the State of Israel? Nuclear weapons, no,
it already has them. Mister Spencer is also unhappy about

(02:50:36):
the reported Palestinian death toll in the Israeli Gaza campaign,
not because of the high number of fatalities, but because
he regards the figures originating with the Hamas Ministry of
Health as inherently unreliable.

Speaker 1 (02:50:49):
Would Hamas have an.

Speaker 2 (02:50:50):
Incentive to inflate the numbers, Presumably it's just that Israeli
intelligence has accepted them as generally accurate. Since the Vice article.
Hamas numbers have, needless to say, change, generally increasing but
sometimes declining. But mister Spencer takes it to be an
indication of their unreliability, whereas by actually downgrading their numbers

(02:51:14):
from time to time, Hamas may be trying to retain
some standard of accuracy and is willing to recognize when
it has made a mistake still quote. Israel's military has
also accepted in briefings that overall Gaza casualty numbers are
broadly reliable unquote, as reported on March twenty four to
twenty twenty five by Reuters. Additionally, the Lancet reported that

(02:51:36):
as of June thirty, of twenty twenty four, total mortality
in the Gaza strip had been underreported by the Hamas
Ministry of Health by forty one percent. Even the arch
Zionist President Donald Trump acknowledged that Gaza looked like a
demolition site following the Israeli campaign in twenty twenty three
and twenty four.

Speaker 1 (02:51:56):
The very real problem of the fog of war.

Speaker 2 (02:51:59):
When we which is almost impossible determine with accuracy total
casualties fatalities, and who particularly has been killed while combat
operations are underway or just recently halted, seems lost on
mister Spencer.

Speaker 1 (02:52:13):
Another relevant fact is that of.

Speaker 2 (02:52:14):
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Net Yahoo, chief proponent of the
Gaza war, currently on trial for corruption again, has been
indicted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court along
with his former Defense Minister Joav Galant. Mister Spencer, who
regards the United Nations as anti Semitic, no doubt would
classify the ICC along the same lines, though he makes

(02:52:38):
no mention. Part of the indictment against the two Israeli
prime the Israeli ministers pertain to a speech given by
mister Net and Yahoo on October twenty eighth, twenty twenty three,
in which the Prime Minister invoked the memory of Amelek,
mentioned in various places in the Tanakh, but especially in Deuteronomy,
in which God instructs the Israelie to blot out the

(02:53:01):
remembrance of Amelek from under heaven Deuteronomy twenty five nineteen
for crimes against the Hebrews and the Ameleks he committed
Ameleks had committed. Mister Spencer is able to produce numerous
accounts of Muslim preachers and activists calling for in some
way to blot out the remembrance of the Jewish state

(02:53:22):
and Jews generally, but he overlooks a comparable case prominent
on the international scene. What involves the Israeli Prime Minister
was mister Netnahoo calling for ethnic cleansing of the Gaza Palestinians. Certainly,
evidence has surfaced that ethnic cleansing has occurred in Gaza,
as reported by Human Rights Watch and Doctors Without Borders.

(02:53:43):
Mister Netnaho's imprecation sounds not far removed from the passages
of the Hagadah recited by observant Jews. Every passover it reads,
pour out your wrath upon the nations that do not
acknowledge you, and upon the kingdoms that do not call
upon your name, for they have devoured Jacob and laid

(02:54:04):
waste his habitation. Pour out your indignation upon them, and
let the wrath of your anger overtake them. Pursue them
with anger, and destroy them from beneath the heavens of
the Lord. Mister Spencer acknowledges the Talmudic injunction kill the
best of the gentiles in time of war. Perhaps that
is what the state of Israel is doing. But if

(02:54:27):
indeed God has given ERT's Israel the land of Israel
to modern day Zionist Jews, then one can wonder what
the God given boundaries of the Jewish state are really
supposed to be, those outlined in the UN in nineteen
forty seven, those created by facts on the groundquote since
nineteen sixty seven, or something else. The biblical boundaries of

(02:54:48):
Art's Israel are clearly open to interpretation, but at least
some Zionist groups both went in within and without the
Jewish state see those ostensibly God given boundaries as very
exc Fans of indeed, stretching from the Nile River to Egypt,
through the Euphrates River to Iraq, including much of Syria, Lebanon, Jordan,
and even Saudi Arabia. If indeed the Greater Israel project

(02:55:10):
is a serious one, the future implications for the Jewish
State its greatest ally, the United States, as well as
the Middle East in general are profound and disturbing. One
can easily foresee a continued string of Middle Eastern wars
waged on various pretenses to expand the Jewish state to
its quote rightful frontiers, all done in the name of God,

(02:55:33):
the most hazardous of political motivations, lawfare and anti Semitism.
As we approach the end of this exercise, let us
pull back and make a general observation. One of the
characteristics of totalitarian regimes, as observed by the great German
American political scientist Eric Voglan, who narrowly escaped the Gestapo

(02:55:54):
in Vienna in nineteen thirty eight, is the prohibition of questions.
That there are certain questions that simply cannot be asked
because they strike at the heart of the regime's unspoken assumptions.
For a start on the prolific vogue Land, one recommends
his small volumes The New Science of Politics, an introduction
and a second Science Politics and Gnosticism, While we can

(02:56:17):
remain grateful that freedom of thought and speech continue to
endure in the West, one hesitates to say thrive, and
especially in the United States thanks to its explicit constitutional protections.
It also is evident that our culture is slighting perceptibly
towards repression. For the case of contemporary Britain see Jonathan

(02:56:37):
Trulli dot org. Even mister Spencer has been the victim
of restrictions of freedom of speech on multiple occasions. In
twenty thirteen, he was denied entry into the United Kingdom
on the grounds of his outspoken anti Islamic views regarding
the violent nature of Islam and the social political threat
that Islamic immigration poses to the West. Mister Spencer is

(02:56:57):
spot on, and that so many should dismiss him and
others who hold comparable views, including this author as islamophobes
is both unfair and harmful to the exchange of ideas.

Speaker 1 (02:57:09):
Yet, as the saying.

Speaker 2 (02:57:11):
Goes, what is good for the goose is good for
the gander. It is evident that serious critical analysis of
Judaism and Jewish history are in the contemporary anglosphere largely forbidden,
areas that the prevailing cultural and intellectual atmosphere. Simply reject
out of hand, one may not do it in polite society.
Else one reflexively attracts the epithet anti Semite and forfeits

(02:57:35):
whatever social and professional standing one might have. And indeed,
the Overton windows seems to be closing further. Moving from
the realm of social peccadillys peccadillos to the political repression,
we must now observe that in the United States a
campaign is afoot to codify offenses of quote anti Semitism

(02:57:58):
by way of federal legend and or presidential executive order.
Already Green Card holders are in jeopardy of deportation for
the expression of views hostile to the State of Israel.
Now the quote US administration argues it can deport a
prominent anti Israeli activist over his beliefs. The pending Anti

(02:58:20):
Semitism Awareness Act makes it torturous. Way through the US
Congress would render the International Holocaust Remembrance Agencies of working.
Definition of anti Semitism currently an unofficial guideline into law
for US citizens, and that definition is anti Semitism is

(02:58:40):
a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as
hatred towards Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifests of anti Semitism
are directed towards Jewish or non Jewish individuals and or
their property, towards Jewish community institutions and religious facilities. Thus,
a certain person which may be expressed, a certain perception

(02:59:04):
which may be expressed i e. A state of mind,
an Orreelian accusation against which one would have no practical
defense could result in federal government action on the basis
of anti discrimination. The Anti Semitism Awareness Act, which targets
colleges and universities under Title nine of the Civil Rights

(02:59:25):
Act of nineteen sixty four, though who knows how broadly
it might be applied, is expected to pass the US
Congress by virtue of its Republican majorities and be signed
into law by President Trump some time in twenty twenty five.
That such an egregious violation of the principles of freedom
of thought and speech, as well as those of the
First Amendment itself is seriously being considered in contemporary America

(02:59:49):
is a testament to how far down the cir slippery
slope of Bogland's totalitarian prohibition of questions we have fallen
and to their great credit, numerous Jewish scholars have taken
a stand against the imposition of IHR definition of anti Semitism. Still,

(03:00:11):
with the way things are going, one wonders if in
ten years time anti Semitism will be as much a
criminal offense in the United States as it was once
in communist Russia. One does not hear from mister Spencer
regarding the Anti Semitism Awareness Act in his book. Perhaps
he has chimed in elsewhere. We can hope that, having

(03:00:32):
suffered from campaigns to silence him on Islam, he will
lend his voice to those committed to freedom of thought
and speech on the matter of anti Semitism out of
principle at least. Yet, when one reflects on the sheer
demonstrated power of America's enormous Judeo Zionist lobby, including the
American Israeli Public Affairs Committee, the United Democracy Project, and

(03:00:55):
the American Israeli Education Foundation, let alone the string of
influential private Jewish political donors such as the Adelson family,
the Schwartzman family, Donald Sussman, the Simon's family, Michael Bloomberg, etc.
All of which collectively pour hundreds of millions of dollars
or more into an election cycle, one can feel the

(03:01:17):
news tightening. The general message of Goldberg's nineteen ninety six books,
Jewish Power inside the American Jewish Establishment is that American
Judaism is well organized and lavishly funded. It has achieved
a great deal of power, and it has been successful
in achieving its interest. Fighting that kind of crowd is
as the saying goes bad for business. Jews contribute between

(03:01:41):
one third and one half of all campaign money in
federal elections, the donations motivated by Israel and the broader
Jewish agenda Goldberg, nineteen ninety six. Jews are thus overrepresented
in campaign contributions by a factor of at least thirteen
based on their percentage of the population, and are overrepresented

(03:02:01):
by a factor of approximately six and a half if
adjustment is made for their higher average income. One has
to ponder the direction in which matters have evolved since
Professor MacDonald, writing over twenty years ago and relying on
research from prior decades, affirmed his conclusions before Google, Facebook,
and Amazon came into their own Having come to the

(03:02:24):
end of anti Semitism, one hopes that one will still
be able to make such observations going forward without being punished,
One remains optimistic. After all, this isn't Spain, this is England.
Concluding observations, jew hatred is as old as Judaism itself.
It has persisted for centuries. It will not end laments

(03:02:46):
mister Spencer. It is a social contagion, says mister Spencer. Apparently,
even he doubts the convincing power of his book, he
proceeds to observe quote against social contagions, rational argumentation is
only of limited value.

Speaker 1 (03:03:02):
Indeed, by the end of his book Anti.

Speaker 2 (03:03:04):
Semitism, one has the impression that mister Spencer has just
about given up on rational argument Would he, in turn
support coercive measures such as the Federal Task Force to
Combat Anti Semitism and the Anti Semitism Awareness Act to
meet the quote contagion of anti Semitism? One wonders for
contemporary critics of the policies of the State of Israel

(03:03:26):
and for analysis of Judaism itself. There may be precious
little breathing room left in the coming years. Still, we
will here reaffirm that anti Semitism, or for that matter,
hatred of anybody, violates the Orthodox Christian directive to love
all people, regardless of who they are, even while as
Orthodox Christian we must persistently affirm the truth of our

(03:03:49):
faith and stand up for what we believe, in particular
the sanctity of Jesus Christ and the most holy Theotokos,
whenever they are attacked by followers of the Talmud or
by anyone el else. Yet, despite the weaknesses of anti
Semitism the book, the fact remains that so much of
mister Spencer's other work has been bold, thoughtful, and important,

(03:04:11):
especially regarding Islam. Jihadwatch dot organ is an outstanding resource
for learning about Islam and Jihad in our time, especially
in regions such as Asian and Africa, which receives scant
attention in the Western press. But by the end of
mister Spencer's book, we are still in the dark about
why of anti Semitism. Why has virtually every culture that

(03:04:36):
has come into contact with Jews and Judaism at some
point reacted with hostility? What is the overarching common denominator
across cultures, times, and civilizations? What would Akham's razor tell us?
Is it possible to point out that the common factor
is Jews and Judaism themselves.

Speaker 1 (03:04:56):
Could that have something to do with it?

Speaker 2 (03:04:58):
Or would that just be another anti Semitic remark to
be dropped down the memory hole along with the observing
the anti Christian contents of the Talmud, the Jewish role
in the massive crimes of early Communism, God's rebukes of
the ancient Israelites through Moses and the prophets, the Lord's
Jesus Christ excoriation of the rabbinic leadership, the warnings of

(03:05:20):
Orthodox Christian luminary luminaries such as Saint Paul and Saint
John chrysosm etc. By the end of Robert Spencer's book
Anti Semitism, History and Myth, we still did not know.
So that right there, guys. That is the article is
God an Anti Semite?

Speaker 1 (03:05:41):
By G. M. Davis. As I said, it was a
great article. I know it was a long reading.

Speaker 2 (03:05:47):
Today, but I thought it was worth sharing with you guys.
So what are your guys' thoughts on all that? Someone says,
good deductive reasoning, fair enough based article.

Speaker 1 (03:06:01):
Yeah, great article. Ack at this says wow, I feel enlightened,
absolutely absolutely.

Speaker 2 (03:06:11):
Okay, let me let me check into some of the
super chats here and see what we got. It looks
like I got a handful of you guys trying to
let me know that I was muted. MGM study says
no audio average Redhead said, it's always the best segments
that get muted. Well, I'll tell you what. Whatever got

(03:06:32):
muted me that was not on me, That was not
boomer tech issues, guys, that was YouTube YouTube. They are
preventing me from setting a superchat goal for today's stream.

Speaker 1 (03:06:45):
The last one I did on what is a Jew?

Speaker 2 (03:06:47):
Facebook immediately deleted and wouldn't let me stream on Facebook.
Not that I care, or there's many people that watch
me on on Facebook, but they they took that down
as soon as I posted it on face Book. And
I just had a feeling that something fishy was going
to happen with today's stream just because the title, and
I noticed right as soon as I clicked live on

(03:07:09):
the stream, everything looked normal, but as soon as I
clicked live, it just was weird how the live stream
was reacting like here in YouTube studio. And as soon
as I clicked on goal, like it never has happened
before in my life using it, but it's just blank.
You click goal and it's just blank and it doesn't

(03:07:29):
allow you to set any super Chat goal or description,
so I'm sure it has something to do with with
the title of today's stream has got an anti semi
so it is what it is, capal, you have no sound.
Thank you very much for the five dollars. Thank you
guys for trying to bring it to my attention. You've
muted for a few minutes now thinking Austin really appreciate it.

(03:07:53):
Nathan Slippery shout out Coty crew member a bagel attack. Yeah,
something happened there. And then when it was muted, I'm
looking here on stream yard. Everything is fine, everything is
as normal, and I just set here not reading my article.
And also all of a sudden the audio comes back,
very very strange.

Speaker 1 (03:08:18):
Mongol mongable mongoloid.

Speaker 2 (03:08:22):
Throws in five, says laugh aloud the Larry Wheels Andre
Sema video and recommended tab.

Speaker 1 (03:08:28):
That's that. Dude's a monster w stream tonight.

Speaker 2 (03:08:30):
Thanks man, appreciate it. Thanks for the support. Oh, he
throws in another ten. Thank you so much, bro. He
so Star of David never heard of it, mate, I've
heard of something about the Star of Rim fan though,
or was it the Black Cube of Saturn? Bail Moluk
and Kronos I forget might have been in. So yeah,

(03:08:51):
I was actually thinking about maybe once I get back
from Nashville and Florida, doing a stream on on uh
like Saturney in spirituality, looking at the worship of Saturn
and ancient paganism, you know, theories about the Kabbastone and
what that was dedicated to before you know, the rise

(03:09:11):
of Islam and Mohammed.

Speaker 1 (03:09:14):
I think that might be an interesting stream to actually do.

Speaker 2 (03:09:18):
First Person Q gifted a Codal crew membership. Thank you
so much. First Person God bless you, bro. Thank you
very much. Average Redhead as well for gifting a Codal
crew membership. Bill Hicks, thank you very much, brother. I
really appreciate you guys. DC throws in two dollars, Thank
you very much, DC, and Lockstep throws in five says
very interesting stuff.

Speaker 1 (03:09:37):
Doc.

Speaker 2 (03:09:38):
I've never really thought of this question before, but I
feel like it was somewhere in the back of my mind.

Speaker 1 (03:09:43):
I'll share well, thank you well.

Speaker 2 (03:09:44):
As you know, for some reason, look at this video.
If you are still live with me, see if you
have the share button multiple people again. Then I said,
as soon as I went live, weird things were happening
on the stream. Multiple people said that the share button
is totally gone from YouTube. Do you guys have the
share button? I'm curious in the chat let me know

(03:10:07):
is the share button gone or is it still there?

Speaker 1 (03:10:15):
Oh? First person Q has the share button?

Speaker 2 (03:10:17):
Okay, good, maybe things are back to normal. Octavian throws
in twenty bucks over on Dono chat, says twenty shekels
for a great stream. Thank you dph Well, thank you
Octavian to the port for the support.

Speaker 7 (03:10:29):
Man.

Speaker 1 (03:10:30):
I appreciate it.

Speaker 2 (03:10:32):
Yeah, Pat Fussy says, I don't, Crispy doesn't.

Speaker 1 (03:10:37):
Some people got it? Huh cool?

Speaker 2 (03:10:44):
Interesting Maybe once it muted me maybe the a'go restarted
or something.

Speaker 1 (03:10:48):
I don't know.

Speaker 2 (03:10:50):
That's weird anyways, Octavian, thank you so much for the
twenty dollars, bro, I really appreciate it.

Speaker 1 (03:10:56):
Let me check stream labs all right.

Speaker 2 (03:11:04):
Over on stream labs, Taylor throws in three bucks. Says,
because of Rabbinic Judaism and Protestantism, I sincerely believe that
Jews and Evangelical Christians will be prime to call God
an anti Semite at the time of judgment and the
Escaton when the truth about all things are revealed. Well,

(03:11:24):
I mean, you just think about, as we talked about
in the last stream, the correlation between Jewish eschatology and
Orthodox eschatology, and we highlighted that they are essentially total
inversions of each other. And you know, the Messiah they're
waiting for is our Antichrist. So in a sense, yeah,

(03:11:45):
we worship God's son, and those who worship the opposite
of God's Son certainly can't be deemed of grace and
the eyes of God.

Speaker 1 (03:11:54):
I mean, that seems to not make any sense.

Speaker 2 (03:11:58):
So they be prime to call God an anti Semite
at the time of judgment in the escton when the
truth about all things is revealed true. Brian throws in
five over on stream Labs and says there's a particularly
interfering treatise. I think he meant interesting interesting treaties from
nineteen thirty nine, written by Russian turned American Jew rabbi

(03:12:23):
Rabbi Harry Wotton. It's called a program for the Jews.
In it, he just he dismisses German Nazism as an
inferior imitation of Judaism, defiantly or definitely a curious read.
I have not heard of that, but I'm going to
save it right now. Rabbi Harry Wanton, Let's let's look

(03:12:46):
it up. Everybody's with me real quick. This is what
he's saying. Rabbi Harry wat a program.

Speaker 9 (03:12:53):
For the Jews. Oh, here we go, let's go to archive. Interesting. Interesting,

(03:13:19):
I'll have to.

Speaker 1 (03:13:20):
Check this out.

Speaker 2 (03:13:21):
I am not familiar with this work, but thank you
Brian for bringing it to my attention. I do appreciate that,
my man. Interesting. Okay, Brendan throws in three over on
stream Labs and says, Alexander McCall has an excellent case
study and critique of Judaism in his landmark book The

(03:13:42):
Talmud Tested, where he exhaustively compares and contrasts Talmudic teachings
against the Law of Moses and the Torah. I've never
heard of that book either, The Talmud Tested.

Speaker 1 (03:14:00):
Oh interesting. Interesting? All right, Well, thank you very much
Brendan for that.

Speaker 2 (03:14:09):
I was an another little read I was not aware of. Okay, interesting,
All right, guys, Well, I need to get off here
because I got I gotta get ready. I gotta get
my clothes ready, I gotta pack, we gotta get all
our stuff together for tomorrow and be driving down Nashville

(03:14:32):
to see everybody at debatecon Are any of you guys
here in the live chat?

Speaker 1 (03:14:36):
Any guys going to debatecon am?

Speaker 2 (03:14:37):
I going to be able to meet any of you
guys in Florida or Nashville? Uh Moji will not be there. Okay,
later acted this God bless brother. No Florida wedding stuff. Oh,

(03:15:00):
Austin Detulio is going. Austin, dude, we'll be able to
meet each other. Are you going to Nashville or you're
going to Florida? DC says no, but he'll watch the
debates when they're posted. Okay, well it sounds like Austin

(03:15:20):
Austin be in Nashville. Nice bro, nice be fun to
meet up in person. Outstanding work, glad I found your channel. Well,
thank you very much, Kevin, really appreciate it. What's the
event in Florida? It's the Athens and Jerusalem Conference.

Speaker 1 (03:15:40):
Fact. I need to finalize my speech.

Speaker 2 (03:15:43):
I have an idea of everything that I was going
to talk about, but I haven't sat down and actually
structured out my speech yet.

Speaker 1 (03:15:48):
I still got to do that. Tell you what, For
some reason I do speeches.

Speaker 2 (03:15:53):
I'm a procrastinator, like I'll have my whole thing in
my head, but I procrastinate to the last minute actually
writing down and organizing my speech for some reason. So, okay,
average Redhead is gonna be at Florida. Awesome, dude, I'll
be able to meet you. I don't know if you're
a woman or man, Average Redhead, but great to have

(03:16:17):
you here in the Codal Crew. Kevin Bacon. It sounds
like Bill Hicks. No, Kevin Bacon and Bill Hicks know
each other.

Speaker 1 (03:16:22):
I'm not surprised.

Speaker 2 (03:16:24):
Two famous celebrities. All right, guys, well, I'm gonna get
out of here. Thank you all so much for the support.

Speaker 1 (03:16:31):
God bless you all.

Speaker 2 (03:16:32):
Smashed that like, and I'll probably end up cutting out
that whole argument or the whole article of today's video
and just upload that as a clip and un into itself.

Speaker 1 (03:16:45):
Exactly.

Speaker 2 (03:16:45):
Kevin Bacon and Bill Hicks are both in our chat.

Speaker 1 (03:16:48):
Guys.

Speaker 2 (03:16:50):
We finally made it. Codyl has finally made it. I
finally finally made it. Austin teldph I said to make
you a mod. Oh yeah, dude, Austin, you should be
a mod. Austin, I'll make you a mod.

Speaker 7 (03:17:11):
Dude.

Speaker 2 (03:17:12):
I just had somebody in the mods was like banning
orthodox people that had problems with I gotta figure out
I have too many mods.

Speaker 1 (03:17:20):
Someone who's a mod.

Speaker 2 (03:17:21):
Went sabotaged like scorched Earth on a handful of like
regular supporters. I had people that regularly super Chat be like, yeah,
I'm banned from your chat, like what, and they were
so somebody, I don't know if it's crispy.

Speaker 1 (03:17:36):
I doubt it's.

Speaker 2 (03:17:36):
Crispy, but somebody who's a mod has like banned a
bunch of freaking people. All right, Mod civil Warrior pretty much.

Speaker 1 (03:17:51):
All right, guys.

Speaker 2 (03:17:54):
Like I said, I will be posting clips for the
next week. I'm gonna be gone Nashville floor. I might
be able to do a live stream talking about debate
Coon or stuff like that once I get down to Florida,
but no live streams for at least eleven days. No
live stream for eleven days. So I will see you

(03:18:14):
guys when I get back, and I promise you I
got so much good content to put together and put out,
So I'm really excited to just get back and get
to work. But thank you all for being here. Please
smash that like and a major thank you to everybody
who supported today financially.

Speaker 1 (03:18:30):
God bless you all. I really really appreciate it.

Speaker 2 (03:18:33):
I wouldn't be able to do this, you know, without
your guys' support, So thank you very very much from
the bottom of my heart.

Speaker 1 (03:18:40):
God bless you guys. I love you.

Speaker 2 (03:18:42):
And so with that being said, I'll see you guys
in the next one as always, until then, God bless
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!

Ruthie's Table 4

Ruthie's Table 4

For more than 30 years The River Cafe in London, has been the home-from-home of artists, architects, designers, actors, collectors, writers, activists, and politicians. Michael Caine, Glenn Close, JJ Abrams, Steve McQueen, Victoria and David Beckham, and Lily Allen, are just some of the people who love to call The River Cafe home. On River Cafe Table 4, Rogers sits down with her customers—who have become friends—to talk about food memories. Table 4 explores how food impacts every aspect of our lives. “Foods is politics, food is cultural, food is how you express love, food is about your heritage, it defines who you and who you want to be,” says Rogers. Each week, Rogers invites her guest to reminisce about family suppers and first dates, what they cook, how they eat when performing, the restaurants they choose, and what food they seek when they need comfort. And to punctuate each episode of Table 4, guests such as Ralph Fiennes, Emily Blunt, and Alfonso Cuarón, read their favourite recipe from one of the best-selling River Cafe cookbooks. Table 4 itself, is situated near The River Cafe’s open kitchen, close to the bright pink wood-fired oven and next to the glossy yellow pass, where Ruthie oversees the restaurant. You are invited to take a seat at this intimate table and join the conversation. For more information, recipes, and ingredients, go to https://shoptherivercafe.co.uk/ Web: https://rivercafe.co.uk/ Instagram: www.instagram.com/therivercafelondon/ Facebook: https://en-gb.facebook.com/therivercafelondon/ For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iheartradio app, apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

The Joe Rogan Experience

The Joe Rogan Experience

The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.