The Ochelli Effect 10-20-2023 Open Mic

News Blues Debate Clauses

The Ochelli Effect 10-20-2023 Open Mic

We require more callers each show and we want to know what form The Friday The 13th Podcast should take.

Is Friday just an opinion forum? Should it be shaped into something else?
Chuck asks Listeners what should be done with the four hours of broadcast from Friday The 13th.

Last Fridays 4 hours of strategic discussion that had seemingly no one doing anything but protecting a position on Terrorism and who has the right to call a land home while many people who are not committing crimes against humanity are and will continue to be slaughtered.

(OCHELLI Thoughts START HERE)

If you read this and already know who the terrorists in Bilad al-Sham are, perhaps ask yourself if you have truly done research on the issues and ask yourself if these conclussions are based on what you refuse to believe or if evidence of any kind would change that rather intense commitment you could be carrying on behalf of someone that engineered that opinion for your cultural adoption because Geo-Political players in Global game are so often telling the truth that trust is easily given by those haven't lied, covered-up, Murdered people with or without the excuse oif war. Right???

Did you note no side was taken during this text? No doubt an assumption was made as to what the author thought and other judgements folllow, but do you have a solution for the podcast question?

B Pete proposed a debate on any part of his position with anyone who wishes to challenge his Pro-Israel and Israels actions opinions.

Chuck was asked to critique with commentary everyone who spoke but not in a personal way.

After lengthy consideration Ochelli being the only guy currently doing production for the network feels as though there is only counter-productive results to be reached regarding dispostion of the 4 hours of audio.

It's not entertaining or informative if collected feedback on the pod from a private unintentionally assembled group of regular Ochelli listeners (No One on the email Chain will be revealed by Ochelli.com unless they first make themselves known)

Accordingly a sub-group of 6 listeners independently made clear to Chuck that B Pete debates will not be easily managed by Chuck who has not displayed the ability to moderate debates without strict control of each particpents mic. and appears to remain a weak conductor that just irritates participents with attempts to be fair. Resulting in those counter-productive results previously mentioned. Controlling your co-hosts mic is not desirable for the sake of integrity in Chuck's opinion.

(END Ochelli Thoughts)

(START The Cousel of 6)

All six listeners unanimously agree that despite their similarity to or divergence from (and there is variety there), B Pete's Thesis, Dissertation and Conclusion in any given discussion of alleged debateare escorted into the verbal arena by solid techniques that are a boxers equivilant of striking and tying up the oponent while leaning on the fighter during the clinch thus wearing down the oponent. Precisely as Hollyfeild was doing so well until Tyson Bit a chunk out of his ear. in 1997 Using more time than any listeners attention span seems to currently tollerate exhausting and preventing the adversary from throwing anything meaningful in response If this is intentional or simply a reflex on his part is unknown.

A majority of these 6 listeners state the call-in shows for the past few years are heard in this way siding with and against him without consulting eachother..
The listeners that analyzed the 4 hours have been invited to debate B Pete but as bad as Chuck is at moderating this might be messy.

Also consulted were a few "Hate Listeners" only 2 responded at all. Only one response contained ideas aside from insults. His o