November 18, 2025 • 40 mins
Jeffrey Epstein’s name is back in the headlines as Congress releases tens of thousands of pages of “Epstein files.” But what’s actually in these documents, what’s missing, and how much is being twisted for political gain? Today Todd walks through the new records from the House Oversight Committee, the DOJ, and Epstein’s estate, explains the now-viral email mentioning Donald Trump, and clarifies what Virginia Giuffre really testified under oath. We separate justice from retribution, evidence from speculation, and truth from conspiracy-as-entertainment while asking who, if anyone, is serious about the victims and accountability. If you’re tired of weaponized narratives and just want an honest look at the Epstein case, this episode is for you.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Attention. You're listening to the Todd Huff Show, America's home
for conservative not bitter talk and education. Be advised. The
content of this program has been talking about it to
prevents and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you
to lean.
Speaker 2 (00:12):
To the right.
Speaker 1 (00:27):
And now coming to you from the full suite Wealth Studios,
here is your conservative but not bitter host Todd Huff.
Speaker 3 (00:36):
All right, my friends, today we are going to walk
through what's really well in this Epstein story, the file.
We can't go through all the files. Listen, this is
a complex thing. But what I want you to know,
what I want you to know more than anything, is
that we are here to talk about this as objectively
(00:58):
and as fair minded as we can, and not to
not to my friends, use this for political purposes. That
seems to be the obsession by many, many people out there.
We're not going to do that today. We're going to
pursue truth and justice and that's what matters. So that's
where we're headed today. I welcome you to the program,
(01:19):
and friends, think about this. Your investments are like seeds
that you plant. They grow, they multiply, but are they
bearing the kind of fruit that you want? Them to
produce At four eight Financial, they believe your money should
reflect your values. They specialize in wealth management and biblically
responsible investing, screening out companies that do not align with
(01:40):
your faith. It's all part of what they call purpose
centered financial planning, helping you live a life of meeting
and purpose. If you want to see if your investments
are aligned with your values or to what degree they are,
all you have to do is head on over to
four eightfinancial dot com slash todd. That's for eight find
financial dot com slash todd to complete a very quick
(02:05):
and easy assessment, and then they're gonna show you. They're
going to show you if or to what degree your
investments align with your values. Four eight Financial. They're here
to worry about your money, so you don't have to.
All right, listen, if you've listened to this program for
any length of time, you'll know I You know this
(02:29):
program is about ideas. This program is about communicating truth.
In fact, one of the fundamental point that the mission,
I should say, the mission of this program, it's in writing,
my friends. The mission of this program is to help
others hear and receive truth. Now I got a version
(02:52):
of that I like how that's worded. In fact, you
might remember several years ago I had a comedian on
this program. His name his name is Michael. He's a
Christian comedian, and if you've not seen his stuff, I
encourage you to take a look. He's very mission minded,
very focused on helping people laugh. And that's where I
(03:14):
kind of I liked what he said. He said as
a as a comedian. You know a lot of comedians
that the mindset is you want to try to get
someone to laugh. I'm trying to get a laugh out,
which is true, is still fundamentally, but what he's the
focus then isn't just on you getting a laugh. The
focus is giving someone an opportunity to laugh. It changes
(03:37):
the focus and it changes things, I think in a
good way.
Speaker 4 (03:41):
And so that's why we welcome.
Speaker 3 (03:43):
I don't I do care, but it doesn't matter to
me for the purpose of you being here today, what
your political background is. In fact, I've had I've had
people say some very nice things about this program who
are not politically aligned with me. They're not politically aligned
with me. I'm not here to be a flamethrower. I'm
not here to engage in personal attacks and the politics
(04:06):
of personal destruction. As Hillary Clinton said all these years ago,
I'm here to help people here and receive truth. And
so I don't chase. I know there's a lot of
people out there who who constantly pontificate and speculate. And
you know, there's the whole conspiracy theory avenue that people
go go down, which that's a whole that's a topic
(04:29):
a day, that's a that's a to me, that's a
day program to talk about even the idea of what
a conspiracy theory is, what that means, How that's to
what degree things like that are possible, To what degree
those things are just well, to what degree they're believable, achievable, attainable,
(04:50):
What to what degree there maybe impossible, and just how
the the language to describe these so called conspiracy theories
are used to prevent people from actually coming up with
other explanations.
Speaker 4 (05:06):
There's a whole topic, a whole show on that.
Speaker 3 (05:10):
And I don't mean listen, the conspiracy theorists have put
points on the board. The conspiracy theorists have oftentimes explained
reality much better than the people who are pushing the
official narrative. Whatever that's about COVID or take your pick
of any number of issues.
Speaker 4 (05:32):
But I do think this is where I would.
Speaker 3 (05:34):
Say I'm not even interested in that approach talking about
conspiracy theories. See, I'm here to pursue truth. I think
a lot of people view these conversations as purely like
speculative entertainment, where they are speculating and again, as I said,
pontificating and just kind of for the sake of entertainment, like, oh,
(05:56):
that could happen, and it's almost like a murder mystery
that has no appeal to me.
Speaker 4 (06:00):
I'll be honest.
Speaker 3 (06:00):
If that's what you're looking for, you probably found the
wrong the wrong show to tune into. But I would
challenge you in this. I would say, if you're interested
in truth, and I think you should be, I think
you should be interested in truth and what really matters.
Speaker 4 (06:13):
Of course, if.
Speaker 3 (06:14):
People are doing these things, then that is the truth.
But the problem is sometimes sometimes these aren't. These conversations
aren't had in such a way so as to get
to the truth. It's just to kind of have another
idea out there. I know there's a lot of folks
out there, a lot.
Speaker 4 (06:30):
Of women like the.
Speaker 3 (06:32):
True crime stuff, which again I listen. I'm not telling
you what to listen to or not to listen to.
But at some point, if these are true stories and
we're just getting entertainment from the story, who did it,
what's the plot, what's the narra? I mean, these are
people's lives. To me, I'd rather get the bad guy.
That's just me. I'm not there just for the story.
(06:56):
This is about truth, justice, and those sorts of things.
So I resist sometimes some of these stories and narratives
out there because it's so much speculation and so forth.
And so I actually today, as I was thinking about
what's going on out there, I thought, what's I think
(07:18):
what's needed is just kind of a comprehensive, fair minded
approach to what's actually happening in this Epstein File story
so far. And that's what I want to go through today.
I want to go through this. I want to focus
on what is what's necessary to do, what the truth is,
so much as we can figure that out and how
(07:40):
we should approach this. So I know many people talk
about Epstein for political reasons. I'm interested in justice, I'm
interested in truth. Once we establish these things, let the
political chips fall where they may, my friends, let them
fall where they may. So we're going to walk through
what's really in those files, to what degree we know
(08:04):
what's missing, how the media, how politicians are spinning it,
what it means for justice, especially for victims like Virginia
Jide Frey who recently died by suicide. So here we go.
(08:24):
What is actually in the Epstein files so far?
Speaker 4 (08:30):
So here's what we know.
Speaker 3 (08:32):
We got the Republican led House of Representatives, they have
a committee called the House Oversight Committee. They've got many
committees there. Of course, one of those of the Oversight Committee,
they've released thirty three thousand, two, one hundred and ninety
five pages on Jeffrey Epstein related records that it has
gotten from the Department of Justice. We had some, you know,
(08:55):
released back to September two. The committee subpoena the Department
of Justice to release everything it had, and the files
include things like emails, memos, reports, all sorts of things, attachments.
It's a paper trail from the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein.
(09:18):
That's the one that he was in jail for that investigation,
those charges when he died by suicide, they say in
two thousand nineteen, just about a week ago. The Oversight
Committee also released another twenty thousand pages of documents from
Jeffrey Epstein's estate. These include his own emails, schedules, contacts,
(09:45):
records of where he was traveling, stuff like that. So
we're looking at over fifty thousand pages that in one
form or another, is public and that's just from the
recent waves here of releases. So when you hear the
phrase Epstein files, what we're talking about are those tens
(10:07):
of thousands of pages that have been delivered from the
Department of Justice and from Epstein's own state.
Speaker 4 (10:16):
It's a lot of paper there.
Speaker 3 (10:18):
It reminds me of Hillary Clinton's emails, just based upon
the quantity there. And that's part part of the problem.
It's it's information overload, and so you have a bunch
of information and it can be confusing to sift through,
especially as just an average person who you know, some
(10:41):
people think they got this thing figured out, they know
what's going on, they can explain.
Speaker 4 (10:46):
All this stuff.
Speaker 3 (10:46):
Other folks are just picking and choosing. Some things can
be taken out of context, some things can It's just
a lot.
Speaker 4 (10:54):
It's a lot of information. So what's largely.
Speaker 3 (11:00):
Already been out there, which is not not new was
uncovered or I guess you could say was found when
reporters initially dug through those thirty three thousand pages thirty
three thousand pages from the Department of Justice, that was
(11:21):
a lot of that was was repetitive. It was copies
of earlier court filings, previous statements from victims, internal emails
summarizing things that we already knew.
Speaker 4 (11:33):
And so there's a lot.
Speaker 3 (11:35):
Of redundancy, a lot of not you know, a lot
of stuff that wasn't new. The Guardian and other media
outlets said the files appear to contain mostly information that's
already in the public domain, and that of course led
to frustration because people think, hey, you've dragged your feet
(11:56):
on releasing this. When you do release it, it's stuff
that we we already think that we know. It seems
to be repetitive what's going on. But there is some
new stuff and stuff that's getting some attention, of course,
and that's largely these emails that are coming from Jeffrey
Epstein's estate, in particular an email where he talked about
(12:21):
Donald Trump. In a twenty eleven email, Epstein tells Julaane
Maxwell Geelane Maxwell that a victim.
Speaker 4 (12:33):
It was listen.
Speaker 3 (12:35):
So the other thing that's going on here is there's
a lot of redactions. You've got to protect the identity
of the victims and so forth. So this was leaked
to the media, was leaked to the media, and it
was redacted. And in an email from twenty eleven, Epstein
tells Maxwell that there was a victim who had spent
(12:59):
quote hours at my house, Epstein said, with Trump, and
that Trump quote knew about the girls. Now pause, there
this this. I know Clinton's name has been mentioned in this.
I mean, of course we all know. Just some other
names that have been brought up and so forth. Prince
(13:22):
was it, Prince Andrew all, just lots of people that
you know that have been hated by one side or
the other. I think that it is that there's a
lot a lot of this can be explained. A lot
of this can be explained by the fact that there's
a desire to bring down individuals, and there's no desire
(13:46):
to bring down an individual that's greater than the desire
to bring down an individual named Donald J.
Speaker 4 (13:53):
Trump.
Speaker 3 (13:53):
I mean, how many times do I have to go
through the examples of how he has been targeted, how
he has been had the government weaponized against him. How
many examples of impeachment and hearings and allegations and criminal
charges and civil charges, and how many times does he
(14:15):
have to sue the media threatened winning lawsuits by the way,
winning lawsuits where they're defaming and lying about the president.
Speaker 4 (14:27):
I mean, there's a lot here to unpack.
Speaker 2 (14:29):
That.
Speaker 3 (14:30):
Again, is another program that's probably multiple days.
Speaker 4 (14:34):
We could go through.
Speaker 3 (14:36):
Those case by cases, probably spend a week on the
way that Trump has been targeted by people in the media,
in the Democrat Party, the globalists. There's a lot of
people targeting President Donald J. Trump, and there's a lot
of people that would love to see other big name
people Obama, Clinton, take your pick go down from this.
(15:00):
Understand people assume that, I mean, some of these folks
are nefarious people who I can understand why people think
that they have a laundry list of bad things attached
to their name. And so people people want justice, even
if it's not for something that we know they did elsewhere,
(15:22):
if they can somehow be implicated here, there's a desire
for that person to pay for what that person has
done to other people.
Speaker 4 (15:30):
I mean, the Clintons.
Speaker 3 (15:31):
You think about all the allegations and all the my goodness,
all the people that allegedly were connected with the Clintons
that died mysterious. I mean that that is again we're
talking about things here that could be episodes or multiple
episodes on this program. So if anything I say here,
some of you have been newer to politics, you might
(15:53):
not know about, say the Clinton the Clinton political machine.
If you don't, I mean that might be something you
want to look into. I just can't talk. That's again
that that would take me hours to go through all
of that. So people want justice, and that's not a
bad thing. We should want justice. But when we stop
(16:14):
wanting just justice and we want retribution, we want this
person to pay, I would say we need to have
a realignment of our thinking here. We're out of we're
out of we're out of whack. That's not the way
to I want. I want justice. I want justice for
the victims. I want justice for the victims families. I
want justice for our society. If to what degree this
(16:37):
was going on and the people who were involved in
Jeffrey Epstein's just absolutely disgusting a led system here of
what he's done victimizing young women, you know, sex workers,
all this stuff children expect, especially especially problematic when you
(17:04):
factor in children.
Speaker 4 (17:05):
You've got not just sexual.
Speaker 3 (17:08):
Assault, which is terrible, You've got just terrible things rape,
and you've got rich and powerful people that have been
alleged to be going to his island for these encounters
with young girls. It's just sickening and disgusting. It's ruined lives,
and we want justice for them. We want we want
(17:30):
justice for their family, and we want these sorts of
things to be People who engage in these sorts of
things to be held accountable, whether they have fifty cents
to their name or fifty billion dollars or trillion dollars
or getting close to Elon Musk's well, Elon Musk numbers
(17:50):
approaching a trillion dollars, So that's what we want. The
White House has said that the unnamed victim in that
email was actually Virginia Dufrey, who actually has a Jew fra.
Speaker 4 (18:08):
Excuse me.
Speaker 3 (18:09):
She has already said in other testimony that President Trump
she never saw him do anything. She basically exonerated him personally.
So if it was an email from her, of course,
the allegation is Trump knew about this. Let's get Trump.
I've seen, I've seen public school. There's a public school
(18:30):
teacher I know who on a Facebook response to me,
actually made the allegation that Trump was having well it
was doing inappropriate things with underage girls. That was an allegation.
I made a direct allegation, not just saying, hey, he's
in a shady situation. It looks like he might have
(18:52):
been involved. Okay, you can ask you, you can have
that question. That's what reasonable people do. But if you
go to the point where you take the claim without evidence.
By the way, what is the evidence. This email is
the evidence where the email said Trump spent hours at
the house and that he knew about the girls. That
(19:12):
was an email from almost fifteen years ago, and according
to the White House, not by the documents, because the
documents were redacted. The documents, so she mean the White
House says that that was written by Virginia Juffrey because
she's the one who said Trump was not implicated, she
never saw him doing anything with these underage girls and
(19:34):
so forth. So there's just a lot of stuff out there.
People want to get certain political figures. Of course, nobody
wants to get anyone more than the insane radical godless
leftists want to get Trump again. It's all part of
the Seinfeld Newman strategy. As long as it takes, They'll
do whatever it takes, as long as it takes them,
so long as it takes Trump away from sixteen hundred
(19:56):
Pennsylvania Avenue and ends this nightmare when they can and
stop screaming at the universe and all that sort of
stuff and begin to live their lives again. But people
are all over the place. You've got conspiracy theories, you
got people guessing or just throwing out names.
Speaker 4 (20:15):
Then you've got the whole thing.
Speaker 3 (20:16):
If you knew Epstein, if you had a picture with
him publicly taken somehow, you're automatically implicated as well. Listen,
it makes no difference Democrat Republican. It just because you
met the guy doesn't mean you had the slightest idea
about this. It could mean that you did, It could
mean that you are participating in it. But being a
(20:36):
person who's fair and just, you can say just by
meeting the guy, just by being a guy that got
an email from him, you may not have had any
idea what he was up to. And of course, at
the other end of that spectrum, you could have absolutely
known and been right in the middle of that Sodom
and Gomorrah.
Speaker 4 (20:56):
So there are genuinely some.
Speaker 3 (20:59):
New details out there, of course, namely what I just
said that Epstein claimed that Trump knew. But much of
what we got from this most recent document dump is
the repackaging of things again that we already knew, or
hiding key details behind black bars and those redactions. So
(21:19):
that's kind of where we stand now. As I get
to the I'm gonna have to pause here. This is
a good place to stop. I've just got a minute
or so here in the program. But truth and pursuing
truth and actual justice, more than retribution, more than political victories,
is the pursuit of truth, and I feel like that's,
(21:40):
of all things, I feel like that is missing dramatically
from this discussion, at least for a lot of people. Friends,
if you're curious about creatom, you're just trying to figure
out who you can trust, let me introduce you to
Christopher's Organic Botanical's family run company that offers natural, lab
tested creatim, not the synthetic stuff that's given cretim a
(22:02):
really bad name. They source their creatim, they test it
for purity, They support They source it responsibly, my friends.
They test it for purity. That's what they're all about.
They're working with farmers in Indonesia. They follow the same
traditions that have been used and trusted for generations. No gimmicks,
(22:23):
no shortcuts, just clean, honest alternatives. Looking for people looking
for more well a natural way, not more pharmaceuticals to
support their health. Start with the Kreatim starter pack, a
great way to begin. Coupon code toad Huff will save
you ten percent off your first order. Can find out more,
(22:45):
get information research go to Christopher's Organic Botanicals dot com.
That's Christopher's Organic Botanicals dot com. Truth, tradition, transparency time
out here for me, my friends, sit tight back here
in just a minute. Welcome back, my friends. Talking here
(23:06):
about Jeffrey Epstein, what we know, what's going on, the
political ramifications of this. I'm deliberately making sure we don't
politicize it, while at the same time explaining and articulating
how this is being positioned as a political narrative. That's
what people in politics care most about. Again, politicians. It
(23:28):
pains me to say it. There's some exceptions to this,
but politics is the art of taking credit for everything
that is good going on in a society, and of
course the art of blaming your political opponents for everything
that is bad. Of course, if there's someone who's involved
in exploiting women and young girls for sex, then of
(23:52):
course you have to somehow tie your political opponents to
that if possible. That's what politics has become for many people.
It's sick and it's disgusting. It should be about ideas
while at the same time pursuing justice. I want whoever
is involved, whatever the political consequences, or even if there's
no political consequences, I want the truth to be known,
(24:12):
for justice to be served. That's what I want, whatever
the political cost. My friends, Department of Justice and the
FBI released a memo in July, you'll remember this, saying
that they found no client list.
Speaker 4 (24:28):
So what that meant was there's no master list.
Speaker 3 (24:31):
He didn't have a little book that says, here's a
list of my clients, you know, and what the services,
what despicable, wicked services they were.
Speaker 4 (24:41):
Paying for or whatever.
Speaker 3 (24:44):
Not a list of people who were involved in solicited soliciting,
I should say, sexual favors and whatever else it's going
on there with trafficked girls. FBI also said they found
no evidence of a blackmail scheme where Epstein would systematically
(25:05):
use compromising information to control powerful people. You can see
why this matters, right, This goes back again. I'm not
implicating him in this Epstein situation, though his name is
certainly brought up. But it's the same reason why one
of the reasons why it mattered back in the nineties
that Bill Clinton was having an affair with the Intern
(25:27):
Monica Lewinsky, Because the idea is here, if foreign countries
get information like this, and they have evidence, and they
make a phone call and they say, mister Clinton, I've
got some evidence here of you doing something that would
really embarrass you, would harm you politically, would destroy your marriage,
(25:47):
would cause your friends and neighbors to question your integrity, whatever.
But I won't release those I won't share that if
you just helped me out with a couple of things,
I need you to do X, Y Z whatever. And
that of course is compromising our nation's sovereignty and our
(26:09):
nation's national security, and so these things matter. And so
if Epstein had evidence on people who were attending visiting
his island and engaging in these horrific acts, and he
had information and evidence, he could say, Okay, I'm going
to blackmail you. I'm going to blackmail you. If you're
(26:30):
a politician, I'm going to blackmail you. If you're just
someone who's elite and wealthy and who has a lot
of power on the world stage. That sort of stuff
can come in handy when you need favors called in.
Also in that memo in twenty twenty five, back here
in July, I should say, the memo reaffirmed that Epstein
(26:53):
died by suicide in his jail cell back in twenty nineteen,
which of course seems absolutely unbelievable to a lot of people,
which of course only adds to the mystery and the
questions that surround this entire circumstance and situation. That same
(27:13):
memo also said the government does not plan to make
future public disclosures for review. That upset people as well,
because they go back and they remember Pam Bondi back
in what was it February, saying she was going to
release the full Epstein list and now suddenly saying that nothing.
Speaker 4 (27:32):
There's nothing there, And I remember talking about this on
the program. This is complicated.
Speaker 3 (27:38):
What do people think when people talk about the Epstein List,
I mean, you know, the idea in the pop culture
is that there's a list that's got all these names,
and it's got the name of the person, it's got
their political affiliation, their net worth, and it's got a
list of the dates that they visited the island, the
things that they did, these just wicked things, the rules
(28:00):
that they were with, that they were raping, abusing, taking
advantage of how much they paid.
Speaker 4 (28:06):
Maybe some videos.
Speaker 3 (28:07):
It's people believe that they're sitting somewhere in some vault
in Washington, DC or somewhere just video evidence of all
this stuff, and that politicians are protecting the release of
that because it has either there on the list, people
that have donated to their campaigns are on the list,
their friends are on the list, another person in their
(28:29):
political party is on the list, and so they don't
want to release it. And listen, that's certainly possible, and
at this particular time, I don't think that that. I
think the Epstein List is really that's not really the
best way to stay It's the most efficient way to
say it, but I think the best way to say
(28:49):
it is probably the Epstein Client evidence. The Epstein, maybe
just the Epstein evidence.
Speaker 2 (28:57):
What is that?
Speaker 4 (28:58):
How do we piece it together?
Speaker 3 (29:00):
And while I don't put it beyond them to hide
information from us, to keep us from knowing the truth,
to protect the people who are politically in the end
class or you know, in the end crowd or whatever,
I don't put that past them at all. They certainly
have it's in their personal interest to do that. They
(29:21):
they kind of like the system as it's set up,
and it's certainly something that could exist. I think that
it's far more likely that there's a lot of questions
and a lot of you know, names and emails and
a lot of reading between the lines interpreting things. I
don't think that it's just sitting there a list of
(29:42):
names who people are guilty, and you can just release
that and then what right, I mean, what if if
that's the case, why aren't there Well I have I
just have a lot of questions about this, and I
think you do as as well. I think it's much
more likely that there's just a bunch of information that
(30:04):
we've gotten that has to be pieced together, and you know,
the obvious connecting that just logically thinking I've got someone
who's been charged for trafficking women and minor girls and
so forth. And now there's like, there had to be customers, right,
there had to be customers, or who was he trafficking
(30:25):
these women too? Who was Gilaine and Jeffrey Epstein trafficking
these people, these young women, these victims too, And so
there's questions, questions that remain So things that remain sealed
are very very heavily redacted include things like grand jury transcripts,
exhibits evidence from those grand jury hearings and so forth.
(30:48):
Some financial records which show who paid what, what amount,
when they paid, parts of flight manifests, travel details, some
internal law enforcement investigative notes, and in communications. So we've
got tens of thousands of pages that include a lot
(31:10):
of information, a lot of just a lot of words,
plenty plenty of those black boxes that cover up things
that are relevant or potentially relevant.
Speaker 4 (31:21):
We don't know.
Speaker 3 (31:22):
We're connecting dots, we're making assumptions. The public can see
just enough to wonder what else is being hidden. And
so you've got this these series of selective dumps, which
now have involved President Trump with this latest email where
Jeffrey Epstein said that Trump knew about the girls, and
(31:44):
now it's it's being heavily politicized. Democrats in the House
put out curated sets of emails that specifically highlight Trump
in you know, in communications here. They've made it clear
that to point out they made it obvious that Epstein
said that Trump quote knew about the girls and that
(32:07):
a victim allegedly spent hours with him at Epstein's house.
This is of course, people on the left see this
as an opportunity to basically go after Trump, but they
also want to target people who are in these elites.
Speaker 4 (32:22):
So listen, I can.
Speaker 3 (32:23):
Agree with you on that. I want justice to be
served for anybody. I don't want to target. I don't
want to say Trump's involved, Let's go find out how
he's involved. I don't want to put anybody's name in
that blank and say let's go find evidence to implicate them.
I want the justice, truth, and justice to be served here.
The White House again, as I mentioned, said that the
(32:44):
email in question here was written by Virginia Giuffrey, who
said that Trump never did anything to her, was not
implicated at all, So that email would the way that
it's being presented by the left, would conflate with actually
what's what's going on there? I listen or what she's
(33:05):
testified to you previously. So there's this, you know, finger pointing,
he said. She said, we got half information, maybe less
than that, maybe ten percent of the information. Then we
got stuff that's redacted. It's just a big mess. Everybody
has their assumptions and we have a lot of theories
and speculation beyond that. I have to take a time out,
(33:25):
my friends, really quickly though. If you're concerned about your cholesterol,
check out Salty so O l t e a Salty
dot com. It's a natural supplement that has been proven
to lower cholesterol. It's good for your heart, may do
the same for you. It's a great way to take
proactive steps to take care of your heart and your
overall health. Salty dot Com so O l t E
A promo code Todd will save you fifty percent plus
(33:48):
get free shipping on your first order. It's very affordable.
It's a great first step. Salty dot Com s O
l t E A promo code Todd. Quick time out here,
my friends back in just a minute.
Speaker 4 (34:03):
Welcome back, my friends.
Speaker 3 (34:04):
Just going through as fairly as we can, as objectively
as we can, and kind of doing a summary of
what we know and don't know about these so called
Epstein files and final segment here that will do that today. Friends,
Let's be honest. When your financial world starts getting a
little bit more complicated, you need more than one size
fits all advice. That's where full sweet Wealth shines the brightest.
(34:26):
Their team specializes in working with families and individuals at
your level, offering personalized guidance that goes far beyond the basics,
from private equity and private credit to options strategies and
coordinated legal planning. Full Sweet Wealth helps you see the
big picture and make confident decisions about your legacy. It's
(34:47):
all about having a dedicated team to guide you every
step of the way so you can focus on what
matters most my friends, your goals, your family, your future.
If you want real financial security, confidence in your life,
if you want to have a team that's helping you
push in that direction, visit full sweetwealth dot com. Full
(35:09):
sweetwealth dot com. Jason and his team are there to
help you answer your questions, my friends, build your legacy,
secure your future. Democrats are trying to spotlight the Trump emails,
which we've talked about, trying to make him look as
bad as possible, trying to implicate him, as they've done
(35:29):
with everything else. You know, they've cried wolf a lot
for President Trump at every opportunity that they've got. They
should have no credibility about this anymore. They desire, they
want him. I let me tell you this, I don't
want any particular individual to be on that list, I
truly don't. But I want the people who are involved
(35:51):
in the so called list, the people who are guilty
of these heinous crimes, to face justice. Absolutely indeed, but
the left wants Trump on these emails. They want him
to look as bad as possible. They want to take
this guy down again, whatever it takes, as long as
it takes them, so long as it takes Trump away
from being this nation's president. Republicans say, look, the victim
(36:15):
that wrote this email is one who said that she
wasn't abused by Trump, and Democrats are cherry picking evidence
to try to implicate him. And then there's you know
a lot of pages out there that don't fit any
narrative that who knows what's really in them because people
(36:36):
are just looking for political headlines and political narratives. So really,
I do want to talk a little bit about Virginia
Giuffrey in the time that we have available.
Speaker 4 (36:49):
She was.
Speaker 3 (36:53):
One of the victims born in nineteen eighty three, died
by suicide earlier this year at the.
Speaker 4 (36:59):
Young young age of forty one.
Speaker 3 (37:02):
Probably she's one of, if not the most well known
victim in the entire Epstein network.
Speaker 4 (37:09):
She was.
Speaker 3 (37:12):
Allegedly groomed as a teenager and then trafficked by Epstein
by Gulaane Maxwell to rich and powerful men. She says
that she was working at the Spa in mar A
Lago that's, of course Trump's Club in Florida, you know
about mar A Lago as a sixteen year old when
(37:36):
Glaine Maxwell approached her about a job that led her
to Epstein. She later brought high profile claims, including claims
against Prince Andrew, which resulted in a settlement, and she
became again the most one of the most well known,
if not probably the most well known person and kind
of the face of the Epstein grew of survivors from
(38:01):
Jeffrey Epstein's Horrible, Horrible Things. She has a posthumous memoir
that is out called Nobody's Girl, that came out just
the last month, telling her story as a survivor and
as an advocate. And what's critical here to the political
issues surrounding this heinous crime, this terrible situation, is what
(38:25):
did she say about Trump? What does she not say
about Trump? Well, in a twenty sixteen deposition that was
visually unsealed, she was asked directly about Donald Trump and
Epstein's crimes. She said that she didn't think Donald Trump
participated in anything. She never saw or witnessed him take
(38:49):
part in the abuse that Jeffrey Epstein participated in she'd heard.
She said that she had heard Trump had been at
Epstein's home, but she had not seen seen him there herself.
Of course, you know where that runs from the media's perspective. Again,
(39:12):
she never accused him of abusing her. Under oath, she said,
I don't think Trump participated in anything, and she never
saw him involved in any of Epstein's crimes. And according
to the White House, she's the one that was the
(39:34):
source of the email. I guess saying that Trump knew
about the girls and so forth at Epstein was referencing
in his email. Anyway, But this listen today's Todd Talk,
and I'm not going to obviously get into that you
can go to the website for that or those are
I put those out every day. Also in our newsletter
toddebshow dot com if you want to sign up for
(39:56):
that for free. But in today's INN newsletter there's the
Todd Talk, as there always is, And in the Todd
Talk I talked about something that Hunter Biden said at
on a podcast this I think this week maybe last
(40:17):
week recently, and on the podcast he said this was
they were talking about the political fallout and everything that happened,
just the political temperature in this country after the Charlie
kirk assassination, and Hunter Biden wants.
Speaker 4 (40:33):
To turn it up, wants to turn it up. Everything
is political for these folks.
Speaker 3 (40:36):
We're talking about life and death, whether it's with Charlie Kirker,
with these these victims of Jeffrey Epstein, and what we
should want is justice and truth. My friends, wherever the
political chips may fall, I gotta go SDG
Attention. You're listening to the Todd Huff Show, America's home
for conservative not bitter talk and education. Be advised. The
content of this program has been talking about it to
prevents and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you
to lean.
Speaker 2 (00:12):
To the right.
Speaker 1 (00:27):
And now coming to you from the full suite Wealth Studios,
here is your conservative but not bitter host Todd Huff.
Speaker 3 (00:36):
All right, my friends, today we are going to walk
through what's really well in this Epstein story, the file.
We can't go through all the files. Listen, this is
a complex thing. But what I want you to know,
what I want you to know more than anything, is
that we are here to talk about this as objectively
(00:58):
and as fair minded as we can, and not to
not to my friends, use this for political purposes. That
seems to be the obsession by many, many people out there.
We're not going to do that today. We're going to
pursue truth and justice and that's what matters. So that's
where we're headed today. I welcome you to the program,
(01:19):
and friends, think about this. Your investments are like seeds
that you plant. They grow, they multiply, but are they
bearing the kind of fruit that you want? Them to
produce At four eight Financial, they believe your money should
reflect your values. They specialize in wealth management and biblically
responsible investing, screening out companies that do not align with
(01:40):
your faith. It's all part of what they call purpose
centered financial planning, helping you live a life of meeting
and purpose. If you want to see if your investments
are aligned with your values or to what degree they are,
all you have to do is head on over to
four eightfinancial dot com slash todd. That's for eight find
financial dot com slash todd to complete a very quick
(02:05):
and easy assessment, and then they're gonna show you. They're
going to show you if or to what degree your
investments align with your values. Four eight Financial. They're here
to worry about your money, so you don't have to.
All right, listen, if you've listened to this program for
any length of time, you'll know I You know this
(02:29):
program is about ideas. This program is about communicating truth.
In fact, one of the fundamental point that the mission,
I should say, the mission of this program, it's in writing,
my friends. The mission of this program is to help
others hear and receive truth. Now I got a version
(02:52):
of that I like how that's worded. In fact, you
might remember several years ago I had a comedian on
this program. His name his name is Michael. He's a
Christian comedian, and if you've not seen his stuff, I
encourage you to take a look. He's very mission minded,
very focused on helping people laugh. And that's where I
(03:14):
kind of I liked what he said. He said as
a as a comedian. You know a lot of comedians
that the mindset is you want to try to get
someone to laugh. I'm trying to get a laugh out,
which is true, is still fundamentally, but what he's the
focus then isn't just on you getting a laugh. The
focus is giving someone an opportunity to laugh. It changes
(03:37):
the focus and it changes things, I think in a
good way.
Speaker 4 (03:41):
And so that's why we welcome.
Speaker 3 (03:43):
I don't I do care, but it doesn't matter to
me for the purpose of you being here today, what
your political background is. In fact, I've had I've had
people say some very nice things about this program who
are not politically aligned with me. They're not politically aligned
with me. I'm not here to be a flamethrower. I'm
not here to engage in personal attacks and the politics
(04:06):
of personal destruction. As Hillary Clinton said all these years ago,
I'm here to help people here and receive truth. And
so I don't chase. I know there's a lot of
people out there who who constantly pontificate and speculate. And
you know, there's the whole conspiracy theory avenue that people
go go down, which that's a whole that's a topic
(04:29):
a day, that's a that's a to me, that's a
day program to talk about even the idea of what
a conspiracy theory is, what that means, How that's to
what degree things like that are possible, To what degree
those things are just well, to what degree they're believable, achievable, attainable,
(04:50):
What to what degree there maybe impossible, and just how
the the language to describe these so called conspiracy theories
are used to prevent people from actually coming up with
other explanations.
Speaker 4 (05:06):
There's a whole topic, a whole show on that.
Speaker 3 (05:10):
And I don't mean listen, the conspiracy theorists have put
points on the board. The conspiracy theorists have oftentimes explained
reality much better than the people who are pushing the
official narrative. Whatever that's about COVID or take your pick
of any number of issues.
Speaker 4 (05:32):
But I do think this is where I would.
Speaker 3 (05:34):
Say I'm not even interested in that approach talking about
conspiracy theories. See, I'm here to pursue truth. I think
a lot of people view these conversations as purely like
speculative entertainment, where they are speculating and again, as I said,
pontificating and just kind of for the sake of entertainment, like, oh,
(05:56):
that could happen, and it's almost like a murder mystery
that has no appeal to me.
Speaker 4 (06:00):
I'll be honest.
Speaker 3 (06:00):
If that's what you're looking for, you probably found the
wrong the wrong show to tune into. But I would
challenge you in this. I would say, if you're interested
in truth, and I think you should be, I think
you should be interested in truth and what really matters.
Speaker 4 (06:13):
Of course, if.
Speaker 3 (06:14):
People are doing these things, then that is the truth.
But the problem is sometimes sometimes these aren't. These conversations
aren't had in such a way so as to get
to the truth. It's just to kind of have another
idea out there. I know there's a lot of folks
out there, a lot.
Speaker 4 (06:30):
Of women like the.
Speaker 3 (06:32):
True crime stuff, which again I listen. I'm not telling
you what to listen to or not to listen to.
But at some point, if these are true stories and
we're just getting entertainment from the story, who did it,
what's the plot, what's the narra? I mean, these are
people's lives. To me, I'd rather get the bad guy.
That's just me. I'm not there just for the story.
(06:56):
This is about truth, justice, and those sorts of things.
So I resist sometimes some of these stories and narratives
out there because it's so much speculation and so forth.
And so I actually today, as I was thinking about
what's going on out there, I thought, what's I think
(07:18):
what's needed is just kind of a comprehensive, fair minded
approach to what's actually happening in this Epstein File story
so far. And that's what I want to go through today.
I want to go through this. I want to focus
on what is what's necessary to do, what the truth is,
so much as we can figure that out and how
(07:40):
we should approach this. So I know many people talk
about Epstein for political reasons. I'm interested in justice, I'm
interested in truth. Once we establish these things, let the
political chips fall where they may, my friends, let them
fall where they may. So we're going to walk through
what's really in those files, to what degree we know
(08:04):
what's missing, how the media, how politicians are spinning it,
what it means for justice, especially for victims like Virginia
Jide Frey who recently died by suicide. So here we go.
(08:24):
What is actually in the Epstein files so far?
Speaker 4 (08:30):
So here's what we know.
Speaker 3 (08:32):
We got the Republican led House of Representatives, they have
a committee called the House Oversight Committee. They've got many
committees there. Of course, one of those of the Oversight Committee,
they've released thirty three thousand, two, one hundred and ninety
five pages on Jeffrey Epstein related records that it has
gotten from the Department of Justice. We had some, you know,
(08:55):
released back to September two. The committee subpoena the Department
of Justice to release everything it had, and the files
include things like emails, memos, reports, all sorts of things, attachments.
It's a paper trail from the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein.
(09:18):
That's the one that he was in jail for that investigation,
those charges when he died by suicide, they say in
two thousand nineteen, just about a week ago. The Oversight
Committee also released another twenty thousand pages of documents from
Jeffrey Epstein's estate. These include his own emails, schedules, contacts,
(09:45):
records of where he was traveling, stuff like that. So
we're looking at over fifty thousand pages that in one
form or another, is public and that's just from the
recent waves here of releases. So when you hear the
phrase Epstein files, what we're talking about are those tens
(10:07):
of thousands of pages that have been delivered from the
Department of Justice and from Epstein's own state.
Speaker 4 (10:16):
It's a lot of paper there.
Speaker 3 (10:18):
It reminds me of Hillary Clinton's emails, just based upon
the quantity there. And that's part part of the problem.
It's it's information overload, and so you have a bunch
of information and it can be confusing to sift through,
especially as just an average person who you know, some
(10:41):
people think they got this thing figured out, they know
what's going on, they can explain.
Speaker 4 (10:46):
All this stuff.
Speaker 3 (10:46):
Other folks are just picking and choosing. Some things can
be taken out of context, some things can It's just
a lot.
Speaker 4 (10:54):
It's a lot of information. So what's largely.
Speaker 3 (11:00):
Already been out there, which is not not new was
uncovered or I guess you could say was found when
reporters initially dug through those thirty three thousand pages thirty
three thousand pages from the Department of Justice, that was
(11:21):
a lot of that was was repetitive. It was copies
of earlier court filings, previous statements from victims, internal emails
summarizing things that we already knew.
Speaker 4 (11:33):
And so there's a lot.
Speaker 3 (11:35):
Of redundancy, a lot of not you know, a lot
of stuff that wasn't new. The Guardian and other media
outlets said the files appear to contain mostly information that's
already in the public domain, and that of course led
to frustration because people think, hey, you've dragged your feet
(11:56):
on releasing this. When you do release it, it's stuff
that we we already think that we know. It seems
to be repetitive what's going on. But there is some
new stuff and stuff that's getting some attention, of course,
and that's largely these emails that are coming from Jeffrey
Epstein's estate, in particular an email where he talked about
(12:21):
Donald Trump. In a twenty eleven email, Epstein tells Julaane
Maxwell Geelane Maxwell that a victim.
Speaker 4 (12:33):
It was listen.
Speaker 3 (12:35):
So the other thing that's going on here is there's
a lot of redactions. You've got to protect the identity
of the victims and so forth. So this was leaked
to the media, was leaked to the media, and it
was redacted. And in an email from twenty eleven, Epstein
tells Maxwell that there was a victim who had spent
(12:59):
quote hours at my house, Epstein said, with Trump, and
that Trump quote knew about the girls. Now pause, there
this this. I know Clinton's name has been mentioned in this.
I mean, of course we all know. Just some other
names that have been brought up and so forth. Prince
(13:22):
was it, Prince Andrew all, just lots of people that
you know that have been hated by one side or
the other. I think that it is that there's a
lot a lot of this can be explained. A lot
of this can be explained by the fact that there's
a desire to bring down individuals, and there's no desire
(13:46):
to bring down an individual that's greater than the desire
to bring down an individual named Donald J.
Speaker 4 (13:53):
Trump.
Speaker 3 (13:53):
I mean, how many times do I have to go
through the examples of how he has been targeted, how
he has been had the government weaponized against him. How
many examples of impeachment and hearings and allegations and criminal
charges and civil charges, and how many times does he
(14:15):
have to sue the media threatened winning lawsuits by the way,
winning lawsuits where they're defaming and lying about the president.
Speaker 4 (14:27):
I mean, there's a lot here to unpack.
Speaker 2 (14:29):
That.
Speaker 3 (14:30):
Again, is another program that's probably multiple days.
Speaker 4 (14:34):
We could go through.
Speaker 3 (14:36):
Those case by cases, probably spend a week on the
way that Trump has been targeted by people in the media,
in the Democrat Party, the globalists. There's a lot of
people targeting President Donald J. Trump, and there's a lot
of people that would love to see other big name
people Obama, Clinton, take your pick go down from this.
(15:00):
Understand people assume that, I mean, some of these folks
are nefarious people who I can understand why people think
that they have a laundry list of bad things attached
to their name. And so people people want justice, even
if it's not for something that we know they did elsewhere,
(15:22):
if they can somehow be implicated here, there's a desire
for that person to pay for what that person has
done to other people.
Speaker 4 (15:30):
I mean, the Clintons.
Speaker 3 (15:31):
You think about all the allegations and all the my goodness,
all the people that allegedly were connected with the Clintons
that died mysterious. I mean that that is again we're
talking about things here that could be episodes or multiple
episodes on this program. So if anything I say here,
some of you have been newer to politics, you might
(15:53):
not know about, say the Clinton the Clinton political machine.
If you don't, I mean that might be something you
want to look into. I just can't talk. That's again
that that would take me hours to go through all
of that. So people want justice, and that's not a
bad thing. We should want justice. But when we stop
(16:14):
wanting just justice and we want retribution, we want this
person to pay, I would say we need to have
a realignment of our thinking here. We're out of we're
out of we're out of whack. That's not the way
to I want. I want justice. I want justice for
the victims. I want justice for the victims families. I
want justice for our society. If to what degree this
(16:37):
was going on and the people who were involved in
Jeffrey Epstein's just absolutely disgusting a led system here of
what he's done victimizing young women, you know, sex workers,
all this stuff children expect, especially especially problematic when you
(17:04):
factor in children.
Speaker 4 (17:05):
You've got not just sexual.
Speaker 3 (17:08):
Assault, which is terrible, You've got just terrible things rape,
and you've got rich and powerful people that have been
alleged to be going to his island for these encounters
with young girls. It's just sickening and disgusting. It's ruined lives,
and we want justice for them. We want we want
(17:30):
justice for their family, and we want these sorts of
things to be People who engage in these sorts of
things to be held accountable, whether they have fifty cents
to their name or fifty billion dollars or trillion dollars
or getting close to Elon Musk's well, Elon Musk numbers
(17:50):
approaching a trillion dollars, So that's what we want. The
White House has said that the unnamed victim in that
email was actually Virginia Dufrey, who actually has a Jew fra.
Speaker 4 (18:08):
Excuse me.
Speaker 3 (18:09):
She has already said in other testimony that President Trump
she never saw him do anything. She basically exonerated him personally.
So if it was an email from her, of course,
the allegation is Trump knew about this. Let's get Trump.
I've seen, I've seen public school. There's a public school
(18:30):
teacher I know who on a Facebook response to me,
actually made the allegation that Trump was having well it
was doing inappropriate things with underage girls. That was an allegation.
I made a direct allegation, not just saying, hey, he's
in a shady situation. It looks like he might have
(18:52):
been involved. Okay, you can ask you, you can have
that question. That's what reasonable people do. But if you
go to the point where you take the claim without evidence.
By the way, what is the evidence. This email is
the evidence where the email said Trump spent hours at
the house and that he knew about the girls. That
(19:12):
was an email from almost fifteen years ago, and according
to the White House, not by the documents, because the
documents were redacted. The documents, so she mean the White
House says that that was written by Virginia Juffrey because
she's the one who said Trump was not implicated, she
never saw him doing anything with these underage girls and
(19:34):
so forth. So there's just a lot of stuff out there.
People want to get certain political figures. Of course, nobody
wants to get anyone more than the insane radical godless
leftists want to get Trump again. It's all part of
the Seinfeld Newman strategy. As long as it takes, They'll
do whatever it takes, as long as it takes them,
so long as it takes Trump away from sixteen hundred
(19:56):
Pennsylvania Avenue and ends this nightmare when they can and
stop screaming at the universe and all that sort of
stuff and begin to live their lives again. But people
are all over the place. You've got conspiracy theories, you
got people guessing or just throwing out names.
Speaker 4 (20:15):
Then you've got the whole thing.
Speaker 3 (20:16):
If you knew Epstein, if you had a picture with
him publicly taken somehow, you're automatically implicated as well. Listen,
it makes no difference Democrat Republican. It just because you
met the guy doesn't mean you had the slightest idea
about this. It could mean that you did, It could
mean that you are participating in it. But being a
(20:36):
person who's fair and just, you can say just by
meeting the guy, just by being a guy that got
an email from him, you may not have had any
idea what he was up to. And of course, at
the other end of that spectrum, you could have absolutely
known and been right in the middle of that Sodom
and Gomorrah.
Speaker 4 (20:56):
So there are genuinely some.
Speaker 3 (20:59):
New details out there, of course, namely what I just
said that Epstein claimed that Trump knew. But much of
what we got from this most recent document dump is
the repackaging of things again that we already knew, or
hiding key details behind black bars and those redactions. So
(21:19):
that's kind of where we stand now. As I get
to the I'm gonna have to pause here. This is
a good place to stop. I've just got a minute
or so here in the program. But truth and pursuing
truth and actual justice, more than retribution, more than political victories,
is the pursuit of truth, and I feel like that's,
(21:40):
of all things, I feel like that is missing dramatically
from this discussion, at least for a lot of people. Friends,
if you're curious about creatom, you're just trying to figure
out who you can trust, let me introduce you to
Christopher's Organic Botanical's family run company that offers natural, lab
tested creatim, not the synthetic stuff that's given cretim a
(22:02):
really bad name. They source their creatim, they test it
for purity, They support They source it responsibly, my friends.
They test it for purity. That's what they're all about.
They're working with farmers in Indonesia. They follow the same
traditions that have been used and trusted for generations. No gimmicks,
(22:23):
no shortcuts, just clean, honest alternatives. Looking for people looking
for more well a natural way, not more pharmaceuticals to
support their health. Start with the Kreatim starter pack, a
great way to begin. Coupon code toad Huff will save
you ten percent off your first order. Can find out more,
(22:45):
get information research go to Christopher's Organic Botanicals dot com.
That's Christopher's Organic Botanicals dot com. Truth, tradition, transparency time
out here for me, my friends, sit tight back here
in just a minute. Welcome back, my friends. Talking here
(23:06):
about Jeffrey Epstein, what we know, what's going on, the
political ramifications of this. I'm deliberately making sure we don't
politicize it, while at the same time explaining and articulating
how this is being positioned as a political narrative. That's
what people in politics care most about. Again, politicians. It
(23:28):
pains me to say it. There's some exceptions to this,
but politics is the art of taking credit for everything
that is good going on in a society, and of
course the art of blaming your political opponents for everything
that is bad. Of course, if there's someone who's involved
in exploiting women and young girls for sex, then of
(23:52):
course you have to somehow tie your political opponents to
that if possible. That's what politics has become for many people.
It's sick and it's disgusting. It should be about ideas
while at the same time pursuing justice. I want whoever
is involved, whatever the political consequences, or even if there's
no political consequences, I want the truth to be known,
(24:12):
for justice to be served. That's what I want, whatever
the political cost. My friends, Department of Justice and the
FBI released a memo in July, you'll remember this, saying
that they found no client list.
Speaker 4 (24:28):
So what that meant was there's no master list.
Speaker 3 (24:31):
He didn't have a little book that says, here's a
list of my clients, you know, and what the services,
what despicable, wicked services they were.
Speaker 4 (24:41):
Paying for or whatever.
Speaker 3 (24:44):
Not a list of people who were involved in solicited soliciting,
I should say, sexual favors and whatever else it's going
on there with trafficked girls. FBI also said they found
no evidence of a blackmail scheme where Epstein would systematically
(25:05):
use compromising information to control powerful people. You can see
why this matters, right, This goes back again. I'm not
implicating him in this Epstein situation, though his name is
certainly brought up. But it's the same reason why one
of the reasons why it mattered back in the nineties
that Bill Clinton was having an affair with the Intern
(25:27):
Monica Lewinsky, Because the idea is here, if foreign countries
get information like this, and they have evidence, and they
make a phone call and they say, mister Clinton, I've
got some evidence here of you doing something that would
really embarrass you, would harm you politically, would destroy your marriage,
(25:47):
would cause your friends and neighbors to question your integrity, whatever.
But I won't release those I won't share that if
you just helped me out with a couple of things,
I need you to do X, Y Z whatever. And
that of course is compromising our nation's sovereignty and our
(26:09):
nation's national security, and so these things matter. And so
if Epstein had evidence on people who were attending visiting
his island and engaging in these horrific acts, and he
had information and evidence, he could say, Okay, I'm going
to blackmail you. I'm going to blackmail you. If you're
(26:30):
a politician, I'm going to blackmail you. If you're just
someone who's elite and wealthy and who has a lot
of power on the world stage. That sort of stuff
can come in handy when you need favors called in.
Also in that memo in twenty twenty five, back here
in July, I should say, the memo reaffirmed that Epstein
(26:53):
died by suicide in his jail cell back in twenty nineteen,
which of course seems absolutely unbelievable to a lot of people,
which of course only adds to the mystery and the
questions that surround this entire circumstance and situation. That same
(27:13):
memo also said the government does not plan to make
future public disclosures for review. That upset people as well,
because they go back and they remember Pam Bondi back
in what was it February, saying she was going to
release the full Epstein list and now suddenly saying that nothing.
Speaker 4 (27:32):
There's nothing there, And I remember talking about this on
the program. This is complicated.
Speaker 3 (27:38):
What do people think when people talk about the Epstein List,
I mean, you know, the idea in the pop culture
is that there's a list that's got all these names,
and it's got the name of the person, it's got
their political affiliation, their net worth, and it's got a
list of the dates that they visited the island, the
things that they did, these just wicked things, the rules
(28:00):
that they were with, that they were raping, abusing, taking
advantage of how much they paid.
Speaker 4 (28:06):
Maybe some videos.
Speaker 3 (28:07):
It's people believe that they're sitting somewhere in some vault
in Washington, DC or somewhere just video evidence of all
this stuff, and that politicians are protecting the release of
that because it has either there on the list, people
that have donated to their campaigns are on the list,
their friends are on the list, another person in their
(28:29):
political party is on the list, and so they don't
want to release it. And listen, that's certainly possible, and
at this particular time, I don't think that that. I
think the Epstein List is really that's not really the
best way to stay It's the most efficient way to
say it, but I think the best way to say
(28:49):
it is probably the Epstein Client evidence. The Epstein, maybe
just the Epstein evidence.
Speaker 2 (28:57):
What is that?
Speaker 4 (28:58):
How do we piece it together?
Speaker 3 (29:00):
And while I don't put it beyond them to hide
information from us, to keep us from knowing the truth,
to protect the people who are politically in the end
class or you know, in the end crowd or whatever,
I don't put that past them at all. They certainly
have it's in their personal interest to do that. They
(29:21):
they kind of like the system as it's set up,
and it's certainly something that could exist. I think that
it's far more likely that there's a lot of questions
and a lot of you know, names and emails and
a lot of reading between the lines interpreting things. I
don't think that it's just sitting there a list of
(29:42):
names who people are guilty, and you can just release
that and then what right, I mean, what if if
that's the case, why aren't there Well I have I
just have a lot of questions about this, and I
think you do as as well. I think it's much
more likely that there's just a bunch of information that
(30:04):
we've gotten that has to be pieced together, and you know,
the obvious connecting that just logically thinking I've got someone
who's been charged for trafficking women and minor girls and
so forth. And now there's like, there had to be customers, right,
there had to be customers, or who was he trafficking
(30:25):
these women too? Who was Gilaine and Jeffrey Epstein trafficking
these people, these young women, these victims too, And so
there's questions, questions that remain So things that remain sealed
are very very heavily redacted include things like grand jury transcripts,
exhibits evidence from those grand jury hearings and so forth.
(30:48):
Some financial records which show who paid what, what amount,
when they paid, parts of flight manifests, travel details, some
internal law enforcement investigative notes, and in communications. So we've
got tens of thousands of pages that include a lot
(31:10):
of information, a lot of just a lot of words,
plenty plenty of those black boxes that cover up things
that are relevant or potentially relevant.
Speaker 4 (31:21):
We don't know.
Speaker 3 (31:22):
We're connecting dots, we're making assumptions. The public can see
just enough to wonder what else is being hidden. And
so you've got this these series of selective dumps, which
now have involved President Trump with this latest email where
Jeffrey Epstein said that Trump knew about the girls, and
(31:44):
now it's it's being heavily politicized. Democrats in the House
put out curated sets of emails that specifically highlight Trump
in you know, in communications here. They've made it clear
that to point out they made it obvious that Epstein
said that Trump quote knew about the girls and that
(32:07):
a victim allegedly spent hours with him at Epstein's house.
This is of course, people on the left see this
as an opportunity to basically go after Trump, but they
also want to target people who are in these elites.
Speaker 4 (32:22):
So listen, I can.
Speaker 3 (32:23):
Agree with you on that. I want justice to be
served for anybody. I don't want to target. I don't
want to say Trump's involved, Let's go find out how
he's involved. I don't want to put anybody's name in
that blank and say let's go find evidence to implicate them.
I want the justice, truth, and justice to be served here.
The White House again, as I mentioned, said that the
(32:44):
email in question here was written by Virginia Giuffrey, who
said that Trump never did anything to her, was not
implicated at all, So that email would the way that
it's being presented by the left, would conflate with actually
what's what's going on there? I listen or what she's
(33:05):
testified to you previously. So there's this, you know, finger pointing,
he said. She said, we got half information, maybe less
than that, maybe ten percent of the information. Then we
got stuff that's redacted. It's just a big mess. Everybody
has their assumptions and we have a lot of theories
and speculation beyond that. I have to take a time out,
(33:25):
my friends, really quickly though. If you're concerned about your cholesterol,
check out Salty so O l t e a Salty
dot com. It's a natural supplement that has been proven
to lower cholesterol. It's good for your heart, may do
the same for you. It's a great way to take
proactive steps to take care of your heart and your
overall health. Salty dot Com so O l t E
A promo code Todd will save you fifty percent plus
(33:48):
get free shipping on your first order. It's very affordable.
It's a great first step. Salty dot Com s O
l t E A promo code Todd. Quick time out here,
my friends back in just a minute.
Speaker 4 (34:03):
Welcome back, my friends.
Speaker 3 (34:04):
Just going through as fairly as we can, as objectively
as we can, and kind of doing a summary of
what we know and don't know about these so called
Epstein files and final segment here that will do that today. Friends,
Let's be honest. When your financial world starts getting a
little bit more complicated, you need more than one size
fits all advice. That's where full sweet Wealth shines the brightest.
(34:26):
Their team specializes in working with families and individuals at
your level, offering personalized guidance that goes far beyond the basics,
from private equity and private credit to options strategies and
coordinated legal planning. Full Sweet Wealth helps you see the
big picture and make confident decisions about your legacy. It's
(34:47):
all about having a dedicated team to guide you every
step of the way so you can focus on what
matters most my friends, your goals, your family, your future.
If you want real financial security, confidence in your life,
if you want to have a team that's helping you
push in that direction, visit full sweetwealth dot com. Full
(35:09):
sweetwealth dot com. Jason and his team are there to
help you answer your questions, my friends, build your legacy,
secure your future. Democrats are trying to spotlight the Trump emails,
which we've talked about, trying to make him look as
bad as possible, trying to implicate him, as they've done
(35:29):
with everything else. You know, they've cried wolf a lot
for President Trump at every opportunity that they've got. They
should have no credibility about this anymore. They desire, they
want him. I let me tell you this, I don't
want any particular individual to be on that list, I
truly don't. But I want the people who are involved
(35:51):
in the so called list, the people who are guilty
of these heinous crimes, to face justice. Absolutely indeed, but
the left wants Trump on these emails. They want him
to look as bad as possible. They want to take
this guy down again, whatever it takes, as long as
it takes them, so long as it takes Trump away
from being this nation's president. Republicans say, look, the victim
(36:15):
that wrote this email is one who said that she
wasn't abused by Trump, and Democrats are cherry picking evidence
to try to implicate him. And then there's you know
a lot of pages out there that don't fit any
narrative that who knows what's really in them because people
(36:36):
are just looking for political headlines and political narratives. So really,
I do want to talk a little bit about Virginia
Giuffrey in the time that we have available.
Speaker 4 (36:49):
She was.
Speaker 3 (36:53):
One of the victims born in nineteen eighty three, died
by suicide earlier this year at the.
Speaker 4 (36:59):
Young young age of forty one.
Speaker 3 (37:02):
Probably she's one of, if not the most well known
victim in the entire Epstein network.
Speaker 4 (37:09):
She was.
Speaker 3 (37:12):
Allegedly groomed as a teenager and then trafficked by Epstein
by Gulaane Maxwell to rich and powerful men. She says
that she was working at the Spa in mar A
Lago that's, of course Trump's Club in Florida, you know
about mar A Lago as a sixteen year old when
(37:36):
Glaine Maxwell approached her about a job that led her
to Epstein. She later brought high profile claims, including claims
against Prince Andrew, which resulted in a settlement, and she
became again the most one of the most well known,
if not probably the most well known person and kind
of the face of the Epstein grew of survivors from
(38:01):
Jeffrey Epstein's Horrible, Horrible Things. She has a posthumous memoir
that is out called Nobody's Girl, that came out just
the last month, telling her story as a survivor and
as an advocate. And what's critical here to the political
issues surrounding this heinous crime, this terrible situation, is what
(38:25):
did she say about Trump? What does she not say
about Trump? Well, in a twenty sixteen deposition that was
visually unsealed, she was asked directly about Donald Trump and
Epstein's crimes. She said that she didn't think Donald Trump
participated in anything. She never saw or witnessed him take
(38:49):
part in the abuse that Jeffrey Epstein participated in she'd heard.
She said that she had heard Trump had been at
Epstein's home, but she had not seen seen him there herself.
Of course, you know where that runs from the media's perspective. Again,
(39:12):
she never accused him of abusing her. Under oath, she said,
I don't think Trump participated in anything, and she never
saw him involved in any of Epstein's crimes. And according
to the White House, she's the one that was the
(39:34):
source of the email. I guess saying that Trump knew
about the girls and so forth at Epstein was referencing
in his email. Anyway, But this listen today's Todd Talk,
and I'm not going to obviously get into that you
can go to the website for that or those are
I put those out every day. Also in our newsletter
toddebshow dot com if you want to sign up for
(39:56):
that for free. But in today's INN newsletter there's the
Todd Talk, as there always is, And in the Todd
Talk I talked about something that Hunter Biden said at
on a podcast this I think this week maybe last
(40:17):
week recently, and on the podcast he said this was
they were talking about the political fallout and everything that happened,
just the political temperature in this country after the Charlie
kirk assassination, and Hunter Biden wants.
Speaker 4 (40:33):
To turn it up, wants to turn it up. Everything
is political for these folks.
Speaker 3 (40:36):
We're talking about life and death, whether it's with Charlie Kirker,
with these these victims of Jeffrey Epstein, and what we
should want is justice and truth. My friends, wherever the
political chips may fall, I gotta go SDG
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Ruthie's Table 4
For more than 30 years The River Cafe in London, has been the home-from-home of artists, architects, designers, actors, collectors, writers, activists, and politicians. Michael Caine, Glenn Close, JJ Abrams, Steve McQueen, Victoria and David Beckham, and Lily Allen, are just some of the people who love to call The River Cafe home. On River Cafe Table 4, Rogers sits down with her customers—who have become friends—to talk about food memories. Table 4 explores how food impacts every aspect of our lives. “Foods is politics, food is cultural, food is how you express love, food is about your heritage, it defines who you and who you want to be,” says Rogers. Each week, Rogers invites her guest to reminisce about family suppers and first dates, what they cook, how they eat when performing, the restaurants they choose, and what food they seek when they need comfort. And to punctuate each episode of Table 4, guests such as Ralph Fiennes, Emily Blunt, and Alfonso Cuarón, read their favourite recipe from one of the best-selling River Cafe cookbooks. Table 4 itself, is situated near The River Cafe’s open kitchen, close to the bright pink wood-fired oven and next to the glossy yellow pass, where Ruthie oversees the restaurant. You are invited to take a seat at this intimate table and join the conversation. For more information, recipes, and ingredients, go to https://shoptherivercafe.co.uk/ Web: https://rivercafe.co.uk/ Instagram: www.instagram.com/therivercafelondon/ Facebook: https://en-gb.facebook.com/therivercafelondon/ For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iheartradio app, apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com