Petro-Patriarchy And Wedding Dresses

.

Episode Transcript

(00:01):
Time to bury the tired narrative,entire narrative, and uncover these stories not
typically heard, but stories that needto be heard right or wrong, life
or death. This isn't your typicallaw show. This is Big Angry Law

(00:23):
with Charles Big Angry Adams on kPrz N. Now Charles Adams, a
lot of craziness going on in theworld. Thank you for joining me this
fine Monday, busy Monday, atone of those mornings where I walk up

(00:45):
at three thirty am worried about whenmy daughter needed to be at the airport.
Are plane boarded at five thirty,at six point thirty, and she
wanted to leave at five thirty,which is completely unacceptable to my get to
the airport at least two hours earlyrule. But it turned out that her

(01:10):
flight was delayed by three hours andshe had not bothered to tell me,
so I was up for absolutely noreason. And of course we wait to
leave until about an hour and twentyminutes before her flight takes about forty minutes
to get there at eight o'clock,and she maned through security with about twenty

(01:34):
five minutes to spare absolutely unacceptable.It does not factor in at all for
all the pitfalls of going into theabsurdist hell hole that is the international airport
here in Houston. That exemplifies whywe don't want the government running stuff now.
She just flew in early early Saturdaymorning. You know regular listeners are

(02:00):
where. She is a resident,a surgeon, an MD, a doctor
and works an incredible amount of timeand only has a limited amount of time
off, but wanted to come homefor a brief period. So I went
and picked her up. She landedaround one a m. Saturday morning and

(02:23):
I pulled in. I followed thesigns to the parking and they were all
closed. When you had to fullycommit, you couldn't turn around. All
the entrance had a cone in frontof him and a guy sitting there in
a golf cart, which you wouldthink his function there was to answer questions,

(02:45):
and the only option you had wasto go through the uber lyft line,
which is always chaos in the firstplace, but most certainly for someone
that doesn't you want to be inthere. I rolled up on went too
and asked him what to deal wasand he just pointed at my only option
with no explanation. I said,well, is there somewhere access to the

(03:06):
parking. He refused to respond because, of course it is Iah and I
have never dealt with a more poorlymanaged, surly group of people in my
life. So I went through theuberlifting and just went and sat there to

(03:27):
wait to pick her up at arrivals. I like to get there early as
well when I'm getting her to parkand wait for her like a father should.
Absolutely awful experience on my way backthis morning, when I finally did
drop her off and I had tocome back take the Sun to he had

(03:49):
to go back to Austin and stucka traffic head court had TV. So
I popped in to Waterburger for abit and saw a conclave a large group
four or five I think it wasfive Metro officers all sitting around talking about

(04:12):
the weather. I think there aremotors officers on motorcycles of year not familiar,
and it brought to mind the questionswhat on earth does Metro PD do.
I know they work accidents to findother people at fault other than the

(04:32):
bus or the trade, but itseems to me that the purpose of the
Metro Police Department should be rather exclusivelymaking it safe for people to ride mass
transit in Houston. I used toride the train all the time when I

(04:55):
had the penthouse, which was righton the train line. I would ride
it both NRG and downtown to Astro'sgames, and it always felt like a
rolling, homeless shelter of aggression,except when it was packed to the gills
with people riding it for a Texansgame. It never felt like there's I

(05:16):
would buy tickets, why because Idon't like to steal, But I felt
often that I was alone on anisland doing that, and I never saw
anyone other than the occasional ticket checker. And then what if you just refuse
to give them your information? What, of course, what would they do.
I've never seen a Metro officer ata bus stop, at a train

(05:41):
station, on a train, oron a bus. And how crazy would
it be to actually have them policethe transit system as opposed to Lord knows
what they do, which I thinkwould be to go out and take report
it's on incidents on the transit system, which I'd much rather have a suppression

(06:03):
of incidents than a report taken that'sstored into a drawer and never investigated.
And of course the occasional accident report. It's insane. It's insane how little
Houston seems to care about the qualityof life for Eustodians. Interesting article in

(06:27):
the Chronicle about, of course,in the typical Chronicle take, which is
to try to diminish the stark realityof crime in the city, because of
course, if the Chronicle pretends it'snot the way it is, well that's
supporting the progressive cause. But theyconceded that maybe sixty seven thousand of the

(06:50):
two hundred and twenty four thousand suspendedfor basically no damn reason investigations were unreported.
Now the Chronicle, I mean,they're supposed to be an investigative journalists,
and I know how they hate theconstables, but they don't seem to
ever talk about the failure of thecity's crime stats to include stuff done by

(07:12):
the constables. And of course allthe unfounded calls to service that are ruled
unfounded because they show up hours andhours later and there's nothing there anymore.
Like the physical disturbance in front ofmy house a couple of months ago,
then two hours later banging on mydoor asking me where it's at doesn't really
do a whole lot of damn good. But you know what, it does

(07:33):
keeps them stats down, and thatseems to be the whole thing, because
if the stats are down, themayor can help the president make the argument
that crime is getting better, notworse, which of course is not true.
But we're being conditioned as people notto expect a police response, or

(07:56):
an investigation or absolutely any justice.We'll be back in just a moment,
Big with Charles Adams on kp rC Nine fifty. I'm walking in raised

(08:28):
just to get wet offs. I'vebeen forcing myself not too far. Get
your suppill words. I've been gettingaway with it. Kis lets you see,

(08:52):
I love you and you love me. Kis Let's you see that makes
Smith feels you know, men thatallow mirrors to make them feel worthless always

(09:15):
shocked me. We're not supposed tobe pretty. We're supposed to be confident,
funny and successful with a side orderof strength. But what are you
gonna do? This is obviously electronic, a techno, I don't know,
super group, maybe alternative dance,but the lead singer of New Order and

(09:41):
the guitarist from The Smith's two ofmy childhood favorites. I forgot about this
band. It also had a coupleof guys from Pet show Boys and somebody
from craft Work during their nine eightor nine year run. This is being
their biggest signal signal single. Butlet's get back to so, you know,
I went to Bray talking about metroped and how I really don't see

(10:03):
how they serve the function that onewould expect them to serve. And yeah,
I got a text from a policeofficer friend bitching at me for criticizing
police, and oh, they doso much more than you understand. Hey,
no they don't. Okay, theydon't what they should be doing.

(10:24):
What they're almost exclusive focused, withthe exception of working accidents involving the rail
line or a bus, or takingreports investigating crimes that should both a total
that should be maybe thirty percent crimesthat occur on the bus or the train.

(10:46):
The other seventy percent should just bepresents at bus stops, train stations,
on buses, on trains too,I don't know. Make it feel
more safe for the tax bank citizensthat actually paid a riot on these things,
not the psychotic meth addled homeless junkiescumbags that make themselves at home on

(11:11):
these As I said, rolling homelessshelters of stank. Well that's just me.
Now, let's shift gears, becauseI really was not planning on talking
about any of that. In thelast segment, I will tell you so,
I saw a libertarian. He usedto be a radio host. Now
I think he has a podcast,A very nice guy. He had posted

(11:35):
on Instagram a screensh out of atweet from a Sofia Kiana Kanni. It
quotes. Scholars like Karen Daggett havelong pointed out the intersection between climate denial
and misogyny through the concept of petromasculinity, which describes the way that fossil fuel
systems uphold patriarchy, white supremacy,and authority terrianism. And he included a

(12:01):
picture of a smug looking Greta Thurnberg. You and I hear this, and
I think, you know here inthe heart of the petrochemical industry for the
world, Houston, Texas. OhJesus, petro masculinity. Well, the
petro masculinity sounds like, you know, gay porn covered in oil. Maybe

(12:24):
I don't know it, but Ihad to look it up because you know,
people get agitated or amused by things, but they often don't dig deeply
into them. Well. Caraen Daggettis a professor at Virginia Tech, and
she wrote an article back in twentyeighteen, a thought piece entitled petrol masculinity,

(12:48):
fossil Fuels in Authoritarian Desire, andman, that's really really diving deep
into the sexualization of academ a petromasculinity, fossil fuels and authoritarian desire by

(13:11):
care of Daggett, that that soundslike something a middle aged housewife would read
before sleep with something that may ormay not buzz. I mean, it's

(13:31):
but this is the new This isthis is what we now incentivize in academia,
right, finding a new way toarticulate oppression and someone else to blame.
That's that's not going to give youa little taste of this. As

(13:52):
the planet warms, new authoritarian movementsin the Western embracing a toxic combination of
climate denial, racism, and misogyny. Now, mind you, my issue,
and I'm not saying there's not issuepollution issues that we need to address.
My issue is that the climate changeeffort is really just an attempt to

(14:13):
force feed communism, if possibly justsocialism and much higher tax rates and greatly
restrict the liberty of the Western world. Right, they want to take away
our freedoms because we have to tosave the world. It's imminent. I
know, we've been saying it's imminentfor decades. And well, much like

(14:35):
the tent pole preacher talking about thecoming apocalypse. Well, we are always
having to move the mark because it'snot happening. But that's what it's about.
But of course, if they combineit with the climate denial, damn
denials deniers, excuse me with racismmisogyny. If you object, that just

(15:00):
affirms the fact that you're a racistand misogynist, even if your objection has
absolutely nothing to do with gender,or ethnicity or race. Yeah, it
confirms it, Caramus. Professor Daggettcontinues. Rather than consider these resentments separately,
this article interrogates the relationship through theconcept of petromasculinity angry oil man,

(15:28):
which appreciates the historic role of fossilfuel systems and buttressing the white patriarchal rule.
Now, mind you, it seemsto me that the butcher chem industry
has displaced a tremendous amount of theworld's wealth to although incredibly misogynist, incredibly
toxic Islamist regimes, not at allwhite, not even remotely white, not

(15:58):
even white adjacent. But yet thatdoesn't jot right. Petro masculinity is helpful
to understanding how the anxieties aroused.She's really full on on how to sexualize
this. Let's start the sence again. Petro masculinity is helpful to understand how

(16:18):
the anxieties aroused by the anthropos scenecan augment desires for authoritarianism. I mean,
this is just about sex with alubricant that is pumped from a derek.
I don't know, I mean it'sit's I mean, this sentence is

(16:42):
insane. Petro masculinity is helpful tounderstanding how the anxiety is aroused by the
anthropocene can augment desires or authoritarianism.That damn black gold that went down and
the earth many many years ago hasgot us all erect and angry and racist

(17:06):
and women heighten. It's all thatblack gold's fault. The concept of petromasculae
suggests that fossil fuels mean more thanprofit. Fossil fuels also contribute to making
identities, which poses risks for postcarbon energy politics. Moreover, through a
psychopolitical reading of authoritarianism might show howfossil fuel can use, how fossil view

(17:33):
us can function. Is violent compensatorypractice and reaction to gender and climate trouble.
Damn it, you filled up yourgarb. That's violence. It's not
just words that are violence anymore.Pumping gas you damn misogynists, racist pigs.
All of you get electric cars rightnow so you can stop being racist,

(17:56):
sexist begots. We'll be back.You're listening, were listening. It's
a big angry law on k pr C nineteen like Red Devil, that

(18:32):
loyal and you WA's something you gameeighties dance tracks. We're still stuck there

(19:11):
if you don't like it. Unfortunately, it's my show. We get to
play whatever I feel like it.And that is Yeah, that's just the
vibe I've been in speaking vibes.I am. I am sad sometimes I
mean I am to get off mylawn on my porch in a chair.

(19:33):
I don't have a chair on myporch yet, but grimacing angrily at the
world like an old man. Ineed to get a cane that I can
wag at people. But it is, you know, I enjoy read it.
I think in the AI age youhave to pull through the chaff to

(19:56):
get to the wheat, because thereare clearly posts that are created to farm
engagement. But there's I mean,just so, there's this wonderful subreddit,
am I. The ah starts witha ends with whole, and it's asking

(20:17):
the reddit community to make a determination. And sometimes it's boring, sometimes it's
sad, sometimes it's poignant, butreally it peels back the veneer of absurdity
that we have found ourselves in inthis incredibly modern age of fluidity. Fluids

(20:41):
just spraying everywhere, including as wementioned last time, oil onto sex in
academia. What an interesting intersection thatwas this of course, Charles Addams Bigger
Radio, Real Text, Real Top, your little hour long alternative programming to
what is on for the rest ofthe twenty three hours of the day on

(21:02):
this wonderful radio station, thanks tothe wonderful overlords of it, who give
me the freedom to talk about whateverthe hell I want, and I let
them down. I've been letting themnow for a while. I'm so busy
and it breaks my heart because Ienjoy this. I enjoy when I have
the energy to read stuff specifically forthis show and make an effort. But

(21:23):
damn it, I'm busy. Imean, I you know, going all
day to day, I feel likeand I'm old and stories like this make
me feel older. Here is amI the A word for telling my fiance
he can't wear the dress at ourwedding. Now, I initially assumed two
dudes getting married, there's an argumentover which one gets to be the bride.

(21:48):
There's a couple of fabulous young menlooking to memorialize their love. But
no, I was wrong. Here, let me read you the little story.
My partner, thirty year old male, and I, twenty nine year
old female, are getting married nextyear. We were discussing wedding planning,
and out of the blue, heasked me how I would feel about subverting

(22:12):
tradition by having him wear the weddingdress while I wore a tux on our
wedding day. When he said this, I actually laughed out loud because I
was sure it was a joke.But turns out he was dead serious.
He said he finds tuxes are verysimilar to each other, and he feel
and feel a lot like wearing asuit to a job interview. But he

(22:33):
wanted to wear something special when hegot married, and he had always thought
wedding dresses were so beautiful and differentfrom each other. Okay, so this
narcissist, this young woman is marrying, wants to feel special and different as
opposed to just wearing another suit.It doesn't seem like he's giving any thought

(22:56):
to the fact that, well,she might want to feel special and different,
and she may also not want herhusband to be that special different.
But it really sounds to me likehe just wants attention, right, He
just wants the social media. Ohoh, how risque. Oh well,
that's different. We'll get clicks now. It seems like she had other plans.

(23:22):
Let's continue reading. I told him, no, it wouldn't be appropriate.
It would turn her wedding into aspectacle, would probably change the way
a lot of our friends and familyview us. Oh those bigots. Why
would you even want those bigots there? I'm kidding. It seems like a
sensible response. My family is quiteprogressive, but I think even they would

(23:45):
wonder what was going on. Hesaid, okay, but seemed down for
the rest of the night. PoorFellow was sad that his wife to be
didn't want to relinquish the dress wearingnews. We're both very progressive, they
seem. She seems hyper focused onmaking sure we're all aware of her progressive

(24:06):
bona fides. We're both very progressive, and I have several close friends who
are gender non conforming non binaries simplylike cross dressing, so that has never
been an issue. But even thoughwe have been together for five years,
he has never expressed a desire todo so before. That's kind of like
saying, yeah, I'm not aracist because I have black friends. Oh

(24:26):
oh, all my family members andfriends are progressive, and of course we
have some friends that are, youknow, different, Thus we're cool.
Let's not forget reddit that were cool. Okay continues. It would be okay
with me if he wanted to experiment, and I think it would even be
a different story if this was somethingthat was integral to his day, the

(24:48):
identity that he wanted to be reflectedin our wedding. I just don't understand
why he wants the first time tobe on our wedding day. Am I
the a word for being controlling overhis wedding entire choices out? You're absolutely
not. You're the voice of normalcy. Who wants your wedding day to be
a special day that celebrates your beauty, him his masculinity as you're a husband.

(25:12):
It sounds like, but I mean, I don't know, I don't
care. You know, women havebeen subverting the norm with a you know,
Diane Keaton in her pinchant for suitspants suits back in? What was
that? What? Y any hall? I was so disruptive back then?
But who really cares? In twentytwenty four? Who's going to be shocked?

(25:34):
Hey? Hey, when Kurt Cobainsshowed up for it was it MTV
unplugged in a dress? It wasscandalous. The gender bending androgyny of David
Bowie and Elton John scandalous. Notanymore, No one cares now. The

(26:00):
best part is the update. Thisis, after all the feedback from reddite
so I based on the so basedon these responses, I realized I may
have overreacted. I had another conversationwith my fiance. I tried to explore
the reasons he wanted to wear adress to our wedding in an open minded
way. I emphasized that he couldtell me if he was trans or non

(26:22):
binarya or wanted to experiment with crossdressing, and I would still love him
and want to marry him. Heseemed genuinely taken aback and told me it
wasn't that big of a deal.He just really liked wedding dresses. That
I had even occurred to him thatI might have a problem with him wearing
one, since it's one of thetwo most common options, and we've been
to weddings where both partners wore adress or both wore tucks. After all,

(26:45):
it's not like he's contemplating wearing sweatsto our wedding lol. But of
course if I did, he wouldbe fine wearing a tux. Now,
that is this is the modern dayright that I can't stand. So this
woman's upset. She looks Threddit foradvice, and they convince her that she's
overreacting. How dare you trying toput your husband in a box. How

(27:10):
dare you impose your selfish desires towear the wedding dress you've probably dreamed of
your whole damn life, you know, because the patriarchy and racism? How
dare you not be more understanding?It really just sounds like he's kind of

(27:30):
a selfish jerk. Maybe she shouldhave someone should have been real with her
and said, hey, hey,he sounds like a narcissist who doesn't care
about your feelings, it continues.Of course, he has no problem with
me wearing a dress. The reverseroles thing was just one of the many
ways he thought he thought that couldgo. He also reassured me that he

(27:52):
would feel safe sharing any changes inhis gender or sexual identity status with me.
I told him we could look atwedding dresses to get other and coordinate
whatever made us both feel special,whether that's dress, dress, dress,
tucks, tux tucks, or somethingelse. Exclamation point. Now, honestly,
I don't care. They be happy, do whatever you want. But

(28:15):
this straight guy who doesn't cross dress, wanting to wear a dress for attention
despite the fact that it's robbing youof that special moment, suggested, Hey,
you know, maybe he's not theone. Update number two Lol.
Can we cut it out with myfiance's gay comments. I'm pretty sure if

(28:37):
he was gay, then he wouldjust be gay rather than go through an
elaborate scheme of being in a fiveyear relationship with the marrying a woman for
cover and doing the least stealth thingpossible in our wedding. I mean,
that's true. It goes on aboutnonconformity, but really he's just an attention
whore and she's a gullible put upondolty back in just sorry, big angry

(29:03):
law with Charles Adams continues, Idon't know why. I don't know you,

(29:51):
but I'm not sure enough seeing constrangeyocks too many times. I love
you, all right, so Iwant to take you to the banks of

(30:21):
lank Ontario, Rochester, New York. An interesting occurrence. Nothing interesting.
So you have a lifelong public servant. Sandra Dorley. She is the first
woman District Attorney of Monroe County,New York. She began her career as

(30:41):
a prosecutor, then ran as aDemocrat in twenty and eleven, sworn in
in January of twenty twelve. Switchedparties to Republican in twenty fifteen, but
announced it well that people should votefor her irrespective of party, clearly switching

(31:04):
parties for political expediency. Me Ihate both political parties for very different reasons,
and will find myself, at leastin the near future, just voting
for whomever I believe promotes the mostpublic safety, law and order focused,
especially in Houston that is spiraling precipitouslyout of control with violent crime, talking

(31:30):
about busting up. And last weekI had one perspective on the University of
Texas students. Today it's very verydifferent. Handcuff them all, throw them
all in jail, the ones thatare creating barricades and fighting the police.
And it's not protest, that's atakeover. And the way they're treating Jewish
students because of course they're blaming peoplebecause of their ethnic heritage for something that

(31:52):
is being done by a foreign nation, foreign leaders that doesn't have anything to
do with them, and they reallydon't really would assume they don't grasp the
issues either, especially those that arewearing hezbealad hamas supporting gear. What a
bunch of idiots. But I supportfree speech. I supported the freedom of

(32:13):
assembly and protest. I don't supportterror or terror adjacent behavior. Now,
gene Wu the local legislature, legislature, of course, what did he.
I've got to indulge me, y'all. I've got to find it. The
I want to get back to whoplaying this clip of this this disc attorney,

(32:37):
the elected DiscT attorney who obviously believesshe is above the law and rules
don't apply to her, which isthe last person that we should want at
any capacity in law enforcement, butespecially not the the elected DA is basically
the top cop of a county.But I've got to digress just a moment

(33:00):
to read Congressman Woo's take on thewhat he's calling the peaceful protest at the
University of Texas, which the onefrom last week was peaceful protesters are only
a direct threat to fascists and dictatorsnow well, but protesters that take over

(33:22):
spaces and are antagonistic to Jewish studentsmerely for their existence, well, that's
not protest. And guess what whenyou do that and you form a human
chain and you refuse the directors oflaw enforcement, well you should go to
jail. That's the way it works. You can't when you kick police officers.

(33:46):
As I'm watching this video, infact, the video that Gene retweeted,
and I'm not a big fan ofGene because he just seems like a
pandering nons I don't I don't evenknow what nonce means, but it seems
appropriate. It's think a derogation thatBrits use. I should look that up,
I guess, but it's it's literallya video of people forming a human

(34:08):
chain, kicking at the police refusingto move. Well, that's that's not
peaceful protesters. But I don't wantto get into it. There's so many
clips, there's so much to talkabout, but I'm just I'm just so
disgusted by all of it, andall the not just tacit, but express

(34:30):
support for terrorist organizations that have beenkilling both Muslims and Jews for so long.
And then of course you have allthe idiots, idiots like, well,
let's let's play this one more.You we don't like, and they

(34:52):
don't like the whities. But letme, let me get back to the
Brodchester, New York. The MonroeCounty, New York District Attorney. And
while she has no place in didyou not hear my lights or sirens or
anybody? Actually, I'm on thephone. Okay, Well you're not supposed
to be on the phone while you'redriving either. Yes, I am with
a hands free absolutely. Okay.Why are yourself upset at me? I'm

(35:15):
doing my job. You you justadmitted to me that you were going fifty
five and a thirty five on Philiptrow leave me alone. It's sir Christal
fully can you stay over here,ma'am you're this is a traffic this is
a this is a legal traffic stop. Do you have your ID? No,
it's in my purse here. Youhave your press right there? No,
this is my lunch. Would youtalk to your talk to Dennis.

(35:36):
I'm the one who prosecutes it.Okay, just go ahead and do it.
Go ahead. Yeah. You knowwhat I've been dealing with all day.
Three murders in the city. Anddo you think I really care if
I was going twenty miles over thespeed limit. I'm just doing my job.
If you hold if you pulled overwhen you saw my lights, which
obviously you did, I thought youwere going somewhere else because I've got no
one would ever pull a black ISSUVif you ran my place. I didn't

(35:59):
run your plate. I just calledyour plate out and then I'm following you
because you're not stopping. All right, All right, by HI time,
I'll talk to Jeff Jumper. Sorry. I didn't want to pull over unfiltered.
It was just I just didn't figureit. I just pulled to my
driveway and I called in and Isaid Okay, that's me that they're trying

(36:21):
to stop. Okay, so that'sin the story. Okay, but you
should know better, right I wasspeaking, I always I don't I know
that. Okay, So why didn'tyou just stop like you're supposed because I
didn't feel like stopping and filters.That's not your choice, you know that.
Well I made it my choice.Okay. Now now you made it

(36:42):
a bigger deal than it needed tobe. It's a really bigger deal.
And when people started calling me it'sa much bigger deal, Well, you
caught. You caused that, Andrew, what do you want us to do?
Not do our job? Because it'syou know, you broke another law
because of that, right, andyou should know better. That's not tri
just an arrestable offense. Sandra,you know this. I was poring dentistry.

(37:07):
I figured I would just stopped inmy driveway. That's what I figured.
I thought. I thought it wouldbe easier. Now that was a
bit insane. So that was theDA. She wasn't stopped the driveway.
She was in her garage. Parkedin her garage. I as soon as
a county car. She called thechief of police while she evaded in a

(37:32):
vehicle or refused to stop. Itcould be a misdemeanor a felony, but
either way it's arrestable. Do youthink she was arrested. No, In
fact, she was given a speedingticket, which she quickly pled guilty to.
Now why did she plead guilty tothe speeding ticket, because then jeopardy
attaches and they can't go back andfile a more serious charge, which would

(37:52):
have been appropriate in this circumstance.After the public outcry, she has slammed
the door on that and she paysher speeding. Teating goes. So this
is why I were in a democracy, And hopefully this will cost her her
her job electorally. But this isthe kind of person that has knowing.
I don't care if she was dealingwith murders in Rochester. You have to

(38:15):
follow the rules. You don't getto break the law simply because of who
you are. And while speeding's nota big deal, my rule on speeding
tickets when I was a police officer, if they're applied and they have to
driver's license insurance, I didn't carewho they were. I let them go,
period, because enough people ride aroundwithout insurance or license that I could
write a ticket to or a handfulof them, and I most certainly wouldn't

(38:37):
have written the elected DA. Ijust said, hey, slow down.
I don't have had to chase them. See back in the all day.
You lose your job over it,because she then tells a loe. Nowadays
with body cameras, body cameras protectgood people from bad cops, and good
cops from bad people, she isclearly a bad person. Hopefully she resigns

(38:58):
soon. Thank y'all for list,and we'll go back tomorrow.