November 25, 2024 • 29 mins
Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky made comments over the weekend about the incoming administration under President Trump and what we should expect from him, and his team as liberals continue to break the law, putting migrants ahead of citizens.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Stay right here for our final news round up and
information overload.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
All right, News Roundup, Information overload. Our toll free is
eight hundred and nine to four one sean. If you
want to be a part of the program, I want
to bring up to speed on the Denver mayor and
an exchange also with Mike Johnson, the Speaker of the House,
because the Denver Mayor has vowed to oppose federal policy,
(00:27):
federal law, and Donald Trump's planned mass deportation of illegal
immigrants over twelve and a half million from over one
hundred and eighty countries including Iran, Syria, Egypt, Afghanistan, Venezuela.
We know the trend de Aragua. Gang is now in
sixteen states. We have cartel members here, we have known
(00:49):
terrorists in the country, we have drug dealers in the country,
gang members in the country. But also you can add
to that, you know tens and tens of thousands of
people from China and Russia. I mean, it's it is
the biggest national security threat we have. So there's two
issues going on simultaneously. Who has jurisdiction, well, that would
be the federal government in this case, to remove people
(01:10):
that did not obey our laws, respect our laws, our borders,
our sovereignty, and then the second way is the best
way to do it. And we're going to talk to
Senator Ram Paul in a second about this, but let
me play for you the Denver mayor and what he
had to say, and then walk back the comments where
he said Tanaman Square, comments where he suggested sending Denver
(01:32):
police to the county border to stop federal officers from
actually doing their lawful job.
Speaker 3 (01:38):
Let's start there.
Speaker 4 (01:39):
These comments that you made earlier this week invoking Tianaman
Square saying that Denver police officers will be at the
county line to stop their out there. So I want
to make sure that we nail down exactly what you
perceive as a potential future for how to handle this
situation in Denver. I want to just ask you very specifically,
(01:59):
are you open been to sending Denver police officers to
the county line to stop federal forces or National guardsmen
from other states from coming into Denver.
Speaker 5 (02:08):
We have no plan to do that, and we really
hope that we don't ever have.
Speaker 6 (02:11):
To do that.
Speaker 3 (02:11):
I have no plan open to it.
Speaker 5 (02:14):
What we're going to do right now is, you know,
it's hard to keep an eye on what the future
president actually plans to do and what the proposal actually is.
Some people think it's just focusing on violent criminals. If
it were just a strategy to focus on deporting violent criminals,
we would be ready partners to work on that. We
do that currently with the previous administration, we do with
a future one. If the plan really is to round
up women and children out of workplaces and school buildings
(02:36):
and public hospitals and grocery stores, I think that there
are a lot of residents in Denver and around the
state and around the country who would say that's not
my America, and I wouldn't tolerate that. So do I
expect people would civilly disobey.
Speaker 3 (02:48):
I think they probably would.
Speaker 5 (02:49):
The same people that came to provide services to folks
who were struggling, I think would also not stand by
to watch them their rights be violated.
Speaker 3 (02:56):
So we have no plan to do that, no desire
to do that.
Speaker 5 (02:59):
But I think we're trying to every possible scenario based
on what could happen.
Speaker 2 (03:03):
And then went on to say that they will do
everything to resist Donald Trump's pass deportation anyway. Senator Ram
Paul argued that the mayor of Denver could be removed
from office and face potential prosecution. Now there's one other
thing about this. I would argue that, and if I
was a Democrat and I believe the law fair and
the weaponization of justice, I would argue that Alejandro Mayorcis
(03:27):
and that Kamala Harris and Joe Biden have institutionalized law breaking,
aided and embedded and more involved in the trafficking of
illegal immigrants. I think that case can be made. I think, however,
I don't support that, but I do believe that this
is the biggest national security threat our country is facing.
Speaker 7 (03:47):
Now.
Speaker 2 (03:48):
The question of is is what is the best way
to do it? Ram Paul agrees that these criminal aliens
and illegal immigrants need to go, but he might have
a difference of opinion as it relates to using the military.
We'll talk about all of this, Senator, welcome back, How
are you?
Speaker 1 (04:04):
Thanks for having me? Sean, Yeah, I think the mayor
is quite confused on this. He doesn't really have the
prerogative of choosing which federal laws he gets to obey.
So if the FBI comes into Denver and they have
somebody who's wanted for murder. He says, maybe he'll let
that go, but if they're wanted for coming across the
border illegally, and we're now going to say, well, guess what,
(04:24):
we're instituting your hearing today, and we're taking you back
to the border to have a hearing on whether you're
staying or not, even if the person hasn't committed a crime.
It's the federal law. This is the law Biden forgave
all these people and said, well, parole them and we'll
do nothing else. I suspect when President Trump comes in
he's going to enforce the law. There'll be immediate hearings
(04:46):
on lots of people, not just ten people, not just
twenty people, but thousands, if not tens of thousands that
Biden released into the heartland. But the mayor of Denver,
if he chooses to resist, or if he sends his
police out, will be arrested. They will go to jail,
they will be removed from office, and the Supreme Court
will defend this. There's something called the supremacy Clause of
(05:08):
the Constitution, and without question, the federal law is such
that these people can be removed. And we've not had
anybody stand up to left wing people like this. But
for all the braying and noise that comes from people
like CNN about insurrections, this is closer to an insurrection
(05:28):
than any riot ever was on January sixth.
Speaker 2 (05:31):
Now you talk about the supremacy clause, the legal jurisdiction
to do this lies with the federal government, not with
states or local authorities.
Speaker 3 (05:40):
There's no ambiguity here at all, is there no?
Speaker 1 (05:43):
And there's also plenty of people to do it, And
that's the other debate is how we do it. I
do think that there are hundreds, if not thousands, of
FBI agents that are doing things they shouldn't be doing. So,
for example, every FBI agent that's sitting around reading my
posts on the internet about whether you wear a mask
or not, whether your child needs to take a COVID vaccine,
and is trying to censor my speech, those people could
(06:05):
be reassigned to actually, you know, picking up criminals and
deporting them. So there's a lot of people in the
federal government that aren't doing anything. About eighty percent of
the federal government doesn't show up in their office, So
there's a lot of people that could be actually commissioned
to do this. Work, and I think that's the better
way of doing it because it has to be done individualized.
This isn't like a war where the military can come
(06:28):
in and do it. I think it's best done actually
by the people who know how to target people individually,
have their paperwork, have the data. Who is it that
we want? Who are we going after? And I think
it will also be accepted better if we go initially
after the criminally violent and you know, I would make
it like an emergency to go after the fifteen thousand
(06:50):
murderers and the thirteen thousand suspected and or convicted rapist
and sexual assault people. I would make that an all
points bulletin. I would make that an emergence see and
I would have that at the top of the list
what the fbis was.
Speaker 7 (07:02):
To be doing.
Speaker 2 (07:03):
Now, yeah, well, you talk about the fifteen thousand murderers,
the thirteen thousand sexual assault predators, but none of these
twelve and a half million, which is around the estimate.
We have no idea about godaways. But you have so
many people from our top geopolitical foes countries would terroritize
entered this country. We have known terrorists in this country, cartels,
(07:24):
gang members, you know, we have hundreds of Lake and
Riley's and Rachel Morins and Joscelyn Nungarys. We have, but
literally hundreds of Americans, including children, that have been raped.
We have thousands of Americans that have been victims of
violent crimes by these alleged Harris Biden illegals. We saw
the case of Lake and Riley and the conviction there.
(07:46):
I don't know, I mean, twelve and a half million
unvetted Harris Biden illegals to me is the biggest national
security threat in our lifetime because I would imagine the
known terrorists that are in our country, we don't know
where they are, that if we don't find them, I
can assume that they're plotting and planning and scheming another
nine to eleven.
Speaker 3 (08:06):
Am I wrong?
Speaker 1 (08:07):
Well, you have to go after them, and I'm all
for it. The only way practically to find them, though,
is to go after them individually. It's not like you
can sort of say, hey, everybody, show up, these people
are now on the LAMB. So you're going to have
to have their names, their last known addresses, any information
you've got when you screen them the first time, and
really the law enforcement agency that's able to do this
kind of investigation to find people is essentially going to
(08:30):
be the FBI also assistance, and I think you have
to try to do it according to the law. The
law says you can't use the military domestically. If you
talk to most of our soldiers, they'll tell you they
don't want to do domestic missions. They don't want to
be policemen. They don't want to be floating about walking.
You know, ten thousand troops walking down the streets in
New York City is not an image that we've ever
(08:50):
contemplated or want to have. But there is a way
to do this, and to do this in a robust way,
but we've ever tried before. Let's start by at least trying.
Like I would say, is you got to prioritize your
list because it's a lot of people. But the fifteen
thousand murderers and thirteen thousand sexual assault perpetrators top of
(09:11):
the list, then you're right. There are people from terrorist
watch lists. There's also people from cartel lists. There's people
had known Todds. And it's like we need to also
remember they all got in because Biden didn't screen him.
He just sort of sent them paid for tickets and
the worst insult. I mean, we're watching the trial of
lacln Riley's murder. Did you realize that they flew him
(09:33):
to Atlanta?
Speaker 3 (09:33):
They flew him to from New York City? Yes, sir, yeah,
so a.
Speaker 1 (09:37):
Lot of Americans looking for jobs, nobody flying any of
us around, and yet they flew him to New York,
first put him up in a hotel, gave him three
meals a day, and then flew him down to Georgia
where he committed murder. So we've got to stop that.
In fact, I think the law my first here, do you.
Speaker 2 (09:54):
Do believe that Harris Biden, may Orcus all aided and
embedded and lawbreaking?
Speaker 3 (09:59):
Because I do.
Speaker 1 (10:00):
Yeah, they did, and I don't know how you actually punish,
and we're lucky to be rid of them. But you know,
my first hearing in Homeland Security when I chair the
committee is going to be on remain in Mexico, and
I frankly think that we should not hear asylum complaints
from anybody who comes in illegally. So ninety nine percent
of them are coming in illegally. I think it's a
not a valid complaint to complain about you wanting asylum
(10:24):
when you come in illegally. I also would turn people
back at the river at the border. If you're halfway
across the river, your boat gets turned around, you get
deposited on the other side, instead of cutting the concertina
wire that the Texans have put out. They should not
be assisted. They should be assisted only in returning to
the dry land on the other side. I don't think
(10:44):
we have to process these people. I think you process
people who come in through normal channels. People who come
in illegal, illegally, I think should be deposited immediately back
on the other side.
Speaker 3 (10:56):
Right we continue.
Speaker 2 (10:57):
Now it's Senator Rampaul, the Great State of Kentucky with us.
So I've thrown out this idea. I've heard nobody else
talk about it. What about giving people a small grace
period thirty sixty days, self report, self deport and you
know we will fly you back to the country. If
you self report and we will deport you, We'll do it.
(11:17):
Humanitarian considerations at the top of the list. Maybe put
money in their pocket, a little bit of money so
they can rebuild their lives, and give them the opportunity
because they were honest that they came here illegally, give
them the opportunity in a year or two if they
want to try or attempt to come in legally, that
they'd have the right to do so. Anybody that doesn't
(11:37):
self report to port those people would never have the
opportunity to come back.
Speaker 8 (11:43):
You know what I would do, if I'd go even
one step further, I would exchange work permits for those
who haven't committed crimes. But the exchange would be you
never vote, no pathway to citizenship. But if you want
to stay in our country and work legally, and you
want to register as a foreign worker, you can, and
then would get away from the people been housekeepers for
thirty years. And I think that's what does bother people
(12:04):
is thinking, well.
Speaker 1 (12:05):
Gosh, I don't want them here. I don't want them
to be illegal. But then again, I do know this
woman and she's you know, she's a nice woman's working
for thirty years. We really want to uproot her and
take her back across the border. And that's why you
prioritize it. Let's see about that case. After we've deported
the thirty thousand murderers, thugs and rapists. Let's see what
about after we get rid of the two million young
(12:28):
young males that came across in the last year or
two that we need to have sent back immediately. So
I think there are ways of prioritizing it. But it's
also if you want the American people to accept it.
I think doing it with the military is the wrong
way to go. But you have scept to change the
law because the law currently forbids it.
Speaker 2 (12:45):
Have you spoken to President Trump about this? And I
would prioritize not only the murderers, the rapist, the gang members,
the cartel members, the known terrorists, but the last the
people that have come in the last four four years,
because they're the ones that came in unvetted.
Speaker 3 (13:02):
Have you talked to President Trump about it?
Speaker 1 (13:05):
I've talked to the nominee for Homeland Security, Christy Nome
about it, and will continue to talk to her about
as we interview her. My goal is to have her
And by the.
Speaker 3 (13:14):
Way, what did she say? If you don't mind, well,
I don't.
Speaker 1 (13:16):
Want to characterize her speech. It's just not fair for
me to do. But I will say that I think
she's a reasonable, rational person and I think I can
work well with her. I'm going to try to get
her nomination done even before the inauguration, and then her
vote immediately after the inauguration. Sometimes we can get these
done in the first day or two after the inauguration,
some of these appointments. And I think I'm going to
(13:38):
work hard to do that. And I think it's a
it's a healthy discussion to have on military or otherwise,
and I think that we can we can do this.
And we've had a long standing tradition of not wanting
our military operating in our domestically because they do, they
operate differently. They're they're trained to kill the enemy. I'm
all for them having that kind of standard, but it's
(14:01):
just different. I mean, this is why we have to
appreciate our police so much, is that police have a
really difficult job, you know, figuring out who individually has
committed crimes, getting warrants, getting arrest warrants, going to the
door of that specific person.
Speaker 2 (14:15):
I think, oh, I got your Your argument's persuasive as
long as we have the manpower and factor in the
urgency of the situation that they have created. Senator Rampaul,
you and your family have a great Thanksgiving. Always appreciate
you being on. Thank you, by the way, doctor Hannity
is in the house. How do you deal with your
crazy Trump hating liberal relatives? On Thursday eight hundred nine
(14:36):
four one Shawn call Us, Now, just tell us how
you're going to do it. By the way, doctor Hannity
is in the house, how do you deal with your
crazy Trump hating liberal relatives? On Thursday eight hundred nine
one Shawn call Us, Now, just tell us how you're
going to do it. Why don't play Bill Maher? I
play all these lunatic lefties. I don't know what's going
on with Bill Maher because he's making too much sense
(14:59):
and on program this weekend, and I guess it was
his last for the season, and I'm still not a
big fan of his and I think it can be
a bit of a jackass. However, he's telling people on
the left what they don't want to hear, why they lost,
and what's wrong with them, And then he even went
as far as to say, I'm not going to pre
hate Trump's nominees. You know, let's see what the disruptors
(15:19):
can do, which, by the way, is you know, after
I've lost elections that I really was invested in and
wanted to win, kind of how I approach things. He
had a debate with our old friend Donna Brazil, and
you know, pointed out that if you want to keep
losing then and you just keep denying that, well, politics
in park cost you the election. And then he sparred
(15:42):
with some other guy, this guy Neil Tyson over vaccines,
and it's like, why doesn't the rest of their party
understand this. I'm trying to understand why they are so
checked out and wrong. Anyway, let me play a few
portions of this for you.
Speaker 9 (15:57):
The country does need disrupting. I mean, the country needs
a colonic and a slot in the face.
Speaker 6 (16:02):
So bad.
Speaker 9 (16:04):
This this is not who I would choose to administer
the colonic.
Speaker 3 (16:11):
But it's not like the bureaucracy isn't bloated.
Speaker 9 (16:13):
It's not like the debt isn't thirty six trillion dollars.
It's not like there aren't thousands of regulations that do
stop people from living lives that they could live better
and don't do anything. There is woke in the military
whatever they're going after. I'm not saying there isn't a
and I'm not going to pre hate anything. Do I
(16:34):
have really good optimistic feelings about it?
Speaker 10 (16:37):
No, I don't.
Speaker 3 (16:39):
You know, I'm just not going to preh hate.
Speaker 7 (16:41):
I can't.
Speaker 9 (16:41):
I can't get into that mind gorad. Let's see what
the disruptors can do, because quite frankly, the experts have
just sort of like let something go for so long
that it's just slerotic now and constipated.
Speaker 11 (16:54):
So while I do believe that they've made significant gains,
there's no question immigration became an issue. But I'm not
going to get into this. All the people are too
damn woke. That wasn't an issue. What happened it was.
I disagree with you, I.
Speaker 6 (17:10):
Know, and that's why you're going to keep thosing I
mean just goes to vaccines. Okay, I don't want to
like poke the bear here, but what I'm saying is.
Speaker 9 (17:22):
The bear believes in vaccines. Just being skeptical of all
medical interventions as everyone should.
Speaker 6 (17:28):
Well except cever, except except ninety nine out of one
hundred medical interventions. You're not saying I need a second opinion.
If you have tuberculosis, you don't need a second opinion.
If you have it's it's not close to ninety nine percent,
break a femur, you have a second I agree.
Speaker 9 (17:46):
But that's not most things that happen to people. Lots
of things that happen to people. And I'm thrilled that
you don't have had this happen in your life. But
most and I hope you never do. But trust me,
just simple at a certain point in their life will
need a second opinion.
Speaker 6 (18:03):
Secon Yes, but that's after you've been through ninety nine others.
I'm trying to put credit back to doctors where our
life expectancy is three times what it was one hundred
and fifty years ago, and everyone before a hundred and
fifty years.
Speaker 3 (18:16):
Ago, but but but lower than.
Speaker 6 (18:18):
The rest pigantic, and half of them died before they
were thirty five.
Speaker 3 (18:22):
Yes, science matters, of course he does.
Speaker 6 (18:24):
But sometimes you don't sound that way.
Speaker 3 (18:26):
That's what worries me. Well, actually, actually.
Speaker 7 (18:29):
You're the guy.
Speaker 9 (18:31):
You're the guy who doesn't understand why the NBA team
can beat the Lakers.
Speaker 7 (18:35):
So I don't know. You know, you're supposed to be.
Speaker 9 (18:37):
You're supposed to be, You're supposed to be the scientist,
and you couldn't even admit that.
Speaker 2 (18:41):
I mean, those are all Linda, don't you think those
are all interesting exchanges?
Speaker 12 (18:45):
I think Rebell Maher saying right now. It's pretty interesting, honestly.
Speaker 2 (18:49):
And he's not acting like a big baby. He even
said before the election, well, I think that Kamalo is
gonna win. But if Donald Trump wins, I'm gonna tell
you what I'm gonna do. I'm going to stay right here,
do my show, make jokes about Donald Trump, and do
my show.
Speaker 13 (19:03):
We know what's funny about him, and this is, I
don't know. I mean, he's not a very religious or
political person.
Speaker 12 (19:10):
While being great.
Speaker 13 (19:13):
He did that movie Religulous years ago, which was like
super offensive on many levels.
Speaker 12 (19:17):
But whatever, that's a conversation for another day.
Speaker 13 (19:20):
But the thing I like about him, and what I
find interesting about him is that he hates everybody right
like nobody's off the shopping block, everybody's up for discussion.
Speaker 3 (19:27):
And I kind of really that's a great way to
put it, because that's like you.
Speaker 12 (19:30):
Exactly equal opportunity hater all day, every day.
Speaker 13 (19:33):
I think what's interesting about him is that, you know,
he had a lot to say here, and you know,
if we look back at Trump, those four years of Trump,
they were so successful and so whether you wanted to
hate Trump or not, your pocketbook loved them. You know
your safety for your family, loved him, and then you
look at the last four years of Biden Kamala and
(19:53):
your pocketbook is empty, and kids are getting killed and
borders are being brazened every day. I mean, we saw
this this morning with the two year old who walked
across by herself. Well, I mean, when do we start
fighting for them?
Speaker 12 (20:05):
I just don't get it. But Bill Mahers, He's just like, listen, man,
I'm going to keep doing me and the rest of
us can cry a good cry, but I'm here to
do a job and he's doing it.
Speaker 2 (20:12):
It's all gonna happen. Leland is in Michigan. Thanks to
our friends in Michigan. That was a big win for
President Trump. Leland, how are you glad you called sar Oh?
Speaker 10 (20:21):
I'm doing well. I'm a blue collar, illiterate, deplorable piece
of garbage, but I'm doing fine. Thank you.
Speaker 2 (20:27):
Oh so our brothers and you know from another mother,
I got it. Well, I'm right there with you. What's
going on?
Speaker 10 (20:34):
I wanted to tell you. I want to tell you
about my friend Betty. She passed away at ninety seven
years old, and she lived by herself, and I called
her a week before the election, and she was telling
me that she had all her family lined up to
vote for Trump and to talk to her you think
(20:56):
that she was on the reelection committee. And then when
I hung up and I found out just last week
as she passed away on Sunday before last and her
family said that she was just elated that Trump got
elected and that he didn't have a filter at all.
(21:20):
But anyway, she was always the last couple of years,
she was telling me, you know, I'm ready to go
and beam me up, Scottie. So anyway, I'm happy that
she was allowed.
Speaker 2 (21:31):
She got to see real hope and opportunity. I've been
saying this, it's these are not words. This is this
is an opportunity that maybe comes along every hundred years.
I think that this presidency can be so dramatically transformational
and benefit every American. You know, when if Donald Trump
(21:52):
is able to secure the borders, remove at a minimum,
these criminal elements, terrorist cartels, murderers, rapists, you know, all
of these gangs, everybody involved in this, that is going
to be a huge, huge benefit to the country. If
he restores law and order and safety and security in
every town and every city, that will be a huge
(22:13):
service to our country. If he gets the economy moving again,
lower's interest rates, lowers the cost of goods and services,
that is going to benefit everybody. If he drops the
price of gasoline at buck buck and a half, hagwon
let me tell you that's going to be great for us.
If he makes us energy dominant, we'll start paying down
the debt, we'll prevent Medicare, Social Security from heading towards insolvency,
(22:35):
and we'll be able to help out veterans more and
other Americans more. If he re establishes America's role in
the world, that's going to benefit everybody.
Speaker 3 (22:46):
He said, you were a blue collar worker in Michigan.
Did you work in the auto industry. I'm just guessing
I did.
Speaker 10 (22:52):
Yes, I worked thirty seven years for the same kind
of walk. And I my retired friends, I have a
lot of them, and uh, ninety percent of them voted
for Trump.
Speaker 3 (23:04):
Well, here's the thing. Think about this.
Speaker 2 (23:06):
You know this ev mandate cost Ford a year ago
four point five trillion dollars in losses. Now, if that
would have continued, how long do you think it would
be before those high paying career jobs with good benefits
that you had in your life. How long do you
think it would be that they'd have to start laying
(23:27):
off a lot of people. If you're gonna, if the
government's gonna with their long reach, force car companies to
produce cars that obviously forwards customers didn't want. If if
anyone wants an electric vehicle, they're probably going to go
to Tesla. They want to produce those cars. They're good
at producing those cars. Don't force every other company into
an industry, you know, the same with you know, we're
(23:48):
going to have to retrofit our homes and put in
new refrigerators, washers, and dryers and air conditioners. I mean,
this madness has to stop. No drilling, no fracking. You know,
we we can be the most energy dominant country on
earth and be the wealthiest will we will be an
energy rich country? I predict them four years. So there
(24:08):
was so much at stake here. But you know, I
care about the guys on the line. I care about
u AW workers because and if Ford makes more money,
they can pay their workers more money and have the
same with you know, GM and Chrysler and any other
car company. I mean, what they were doing is they
were they were destroying these jobs, these career, high paying jobs,
(24:33):
and I'm like, it's unbelievable. They don't understand working men
and women. They've become the party of George Clooney, Julia Roberts, Hollywood,
San Francisco and New York and DC, and they're out
of touch with the people that actually, you know, are
the great Americans like you and your friend Betty.
Speaker 10 (24:50):
Yeah, I really miss Betty. She was she was a
good person.
Speaker 3 (24:55):
And sorry about your loss. I really mean that.
Speaker 10 (25:00):
Workers like you say we're all retired. We can see
the writing on the wall, you know. I'm sure a
lot of the people who are working can too. You know.
Speaker 2 (25:09):
Well, God bless you Leland. You you deserve your vacate
your retirement. I hope you enjoy it in good health.
I'm sorry about your loss. I'm glad you called to helpe.
You'll check back in soon.
Speaker 10 (25:19):
Okay, Ollie, thanks for taking my call.
Speaker 2 (25:22):
Thank you, my friend. Eight hundred and nine to four one.
Shawn is a number if you want to be a
part of the program. Let us say hi to Brian
and Oklahoma. Brian, how are you glad you called?
Speaker 7 (25:34):
Thank you very much for taking my call.
Speaker 3 (25:37):
My pleasure.
Speaker 7 (25:37):
I appreciate. I appreciate all you do for our country
and for educating all your listeners. I'm a schoolteacher here
in al Reno, Oklahoma, and I'm also the district's historian,
and I was hoping to get to challenge your listeners
to consider doing something similar to what we do here
in al Reno and their communities that really helped to
(25:59):
highlight our veterans and support our veterans. Like I said,
there's two programs that The first is a project that
we've been doing for seventy nine years, Sarah Alverno, ever
since the end of World War Two, and even before then,
we were doing something similar to it called Gifts for
the Yanks who gave and in it we have our
(26:20):
students raise money. We raise usually thousands of dollars, and
they go out and purchase gifts, wrap them, and then
they deliver them in person to the patients at the
VA Hospital in Oklahoma City. It's a program that started
right after during World War two, actually, and the American
(26:40):
Legion does it. The Ohio and Illinois American Legions I
know are really active with it.
Speaker 10 (26:46):
But we're the.
Speaker 7 (26:47):
Only high school in the country that still does it.
And has done it ever since nineteen forty five.
Speaker 3 (26:53):
What's the website if people want to go there? What
is it?
Speaker 7 (26:57):
L renops dot org is our websit, and I can.
I'll be happy to help out giving people ideas. It's
a really emotional experience for our students to get to
deliver these gifts because they get, you know, the hand
deliver them, and the veterans tell their stories and you know,
may its awesome people people cry. Yeah, absolutely, and we
(27:18):
always get thank you letters from from the patients, you know,
saying how much they appreciated.
Speaker 2 (27:24):
Let me tell you there's something that happens every Thanksgiving
around this country, and we fully support what you're doing
and your work, and I hope people in Oklahoma will
help you out. But I'm going to tell you something.
There are people that on this Thanksgiving and I've done
it a few years myself. I haven't done it recently
and I really should. And that is that they get
(27:45):
really involved in their community and they buy a bunch
of turkeys, They feed the homeless, they help the indigen
the elderly people in nursing homes. I don't know, there's
there's so much goodness and greatness in America, the unsung heroes,
which by the way, we try to give recognition to them,
(28:06):
and that's what the Patriot Awards are all about. And
I'm going to make my triumphant appearance to New York
where it's being held this year at Long Island University.
And by the way, if people want to come, you
can go to Foxnation dot com. But instead of Hollywood,
you know, slapping themselves on the back and musical artists
slapping themselves on the back, you know, we dedicated night
(28:29):
to the unsung heroes like you and the great work
that they do day in and day out that never
get any recognition. And I'm honored to be the MC
this year, and I hope people in New York, New
Jersey or may be flying from around the country and
Long Island will get there. You just go to Foxnation
dot com. It's on December fifth, looking forward to it
(28:50):
one week from this Thanksgiving.
Speaker 3 (28:54):
All right, that's gonna wrap.
Speaker 2 (28:55):
Things up at Today Hannity tonight nine Eastern on the
Fox News Channel.
Speaker 3 (28:58):
Please set you dbr.
Speaker 2 (29:00):
Tom Holman will join us, Greg Abbott, also Laura Trump,
Mike Huckabee, Sage Steele, and Charlie Hurt.
Speaker 3 (29:06):
Nine Eastern.
Speaker 2 (29:07):
Say you DVR HANNEDY and Fox will see you tonight
back here tomorrow. Yes, we want to know how you're
going to deal with your crazy liberal trumpeting relatives this
Thursday Whosday edition Sean Hannity Show, will see you tomorrow
Stay right here for our final news round up and
information overload.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
All right, News Roundup, Information overload. Our toll free is
eight hundred and nine to four one sean. If you
want to be a part of the program, I want
to bring up to speed on the Denver mayor and
an exchange also with Mike Johnson, the Speaker of the House,
because the Denver Mayor has vowed to oppose federal policy,
(00:27):
federal law, and Donald Trump's planned mass deportation of illegal
immigrants over twelve and a half million from over one
hundred and eighty countries including Iran, Syria, Egypt, Afghanistan, Venezuela.
We know the trend de Aragua. Gang is now in
sixteen states. We have cartel members here, we have known
(00:49):
terrorists in the country, we have drug dealers in the country,
gang members in the country. But also you can add
to that, you know tens and tens of thousands of
people from China and Russia. I mean, it's it is
the biggest national security threat we have. So there's two
issues going on simultaneously. Who has jurisdiction, well, that would
be the federal government in this case, to remove people
(01:10):
that did not obey our laws, respect our laws, our borders,
our sovereignty, and then the second way is the best
way to do it. And we're going to talk to
Senator Ram Paul in a second about this, but let
me play for you the Denver mayor and what he
had to say, and then walk back the comments where
he said Tanaman Square, comments where he suggested sending Denver
(01:32):
police to the county border to stop federal officers from
actually doing their lawful job.
Speaker 3 (01:38):
Let's start there.
Speaker 4 (01:39):
These comments that you made earlier this week invoking Tianaman
Square saying that Denver police officers will be at the
county line to stop their out there. So I want
to make sure that we nail down exactly what you
perceive as a potential future for how to handle this
situation in Denver. I want to just ask you very specifically,
(01:59):
are you open been to sending Denver police officers to
the county line to stop federal forces or National guardsmen
from other states from coming into Denver.
Speaker 5 (02:08):
We have no plan to do that, and we really
hope that we don't ever have.
Speaker 6 (02:11):
To do that.
Speaker 3 (02:11):
I have no plan open to it.
Speaker 5 (02:14):
What we're going to do right now is, you know,
it's hard to keep an eye on what the future
president actually plans to do and what the proposal actually is.
Some people think it's just focusing on violent criminals. If
it were just a strategy to focus on deporting violent criminals,
we would be ready partners to work on that. We
do that currently with the previous administration, we do with
a future one. If the plan really is to round
up women and children out of workplaces and school buildings
(02:36):
and public hospitals and grocery stores, I think that there
are a lot of residents in Denver and around the
state and around the country who would say that's not
my America, and I wouldn't tolerate that. So do I
expect people would civilly disobey.
Speaker 3 (02:48):
I think they probably would.
Speaker 5 (02:49):
The same people that came to provide services to folks
who were struggling, I think would also not stand by
to watch them their rights be violated.
Speaker 3 (02:56):
So we have no plan to do that, no desire
to do that.
Speaker 5 (02:59):
But I think we're trying to every possible scenario based
on what could happen.
Speaker 2 (03:03):
And then went on to say that they will do
everything to resist Donald Trump's pass deportation anyway. Senator Ram
Paul argued that the mayor of Denver could be removed
from office and face potential prosecution. Now there's one other
thing about this. I would argue that, and if I
was a Democrat and I believe the law fair and
the weaponization of justice, I would argue that Alejandro Mayorcis
(03:27):
and that Kamala Harris and Joe Biden have institutionalized law breaking,
aided and embedded and more involved in the trafficking of
illegal immigrants. I think that case can be made. I think, however,
I don't support that, but I do believe that this
is the biggest national security threat our country is facing.
Speaker 7 (03:47):
Now.
Speaker 2 (03:48):
The question of is is what is the best way
to do it? Ram Paul agrees that these criminal aliens
and illegal immigrants need to go, but he might have
a difference of opinion as it relates to using the military.
We'll talk about all of this, Senator, welcome back, How
are you?
Speaker 1 (04:04):
Thanks for having me? Sean, Yeah, I think the mayor
is quite confused on this. He doesn't really have the
prerogative of choosing which federal laws he gets to obey.
So if the FBI comes into Denver and they have
somebody who's wanted for murder. He says, maybe he'll let
that go, but if they're wanted for coming across the
border illegally, and we're now going to say, well, guess what,
(04:24):
we're instituting your hearing today, and we're taking you back
to the border to have a hearing on whether you're
staying or not, even if the person hasn't committed a crime.
It's the federal law. This is the law Biden forgave
all these people and said, well, parole them and we'll
do nothing else. I suspect when President Trump comes in
he's going to enforce the law. There'll be immediate hearings
(04:46):
on lots of people, not just ten people, not just
twenty people, but thousands, if not tens of thousands that
Biden released into the heartland. But the mayor of Denver,
if he chooses to resist, or if he sends his
police out, will be arrested. They will go to jail,
they will be removed from office, and the Supreme Court
will defend this. There's something called the supremacy Clause of
(05:08):
the Constitution, and without question, the federal law is such
that these people can be removed. And we've not had
anybody stand up to left wing people like this. But
for all the braying and noise that comes from people
like CNN about insurrections, this is closer to an insurrection
(05:28):
than any riot ever was on January sixth.
Speaker 2 (05:31):
Now you talk about the supremacy clause, the legal jurisdiction
to do this lies with the federal government, not with
states or local authorities.
Speaker 3 (05:40):
There's no ambiguity here at all, is there no?
Speaker 1 (05:43):
And there's also plenty of people to do it, And
that's the other debate is how we do it. I
do think that there are hundreds, if not thousands, of
FBI agents that are doing things they shouldn't be doing. So,
for example, every FBI agent that's sitting around reading my
posts on the internet about whether you wear a mask
or not, whether your child needs to take a COVID vaccine,
and is trying to censor my speech, those people could
(06:05):
be reassigned to actually, you know, picking up criminals and
deporting them. So there's a lot of people in the
federal government that aren't doing anything. About eighty percent of
the federal government doesn't show up in their office, So
there's a lot of people that could be actually commissioned
to do this. Work, and I think that's the better
way of doing it because it has to be done individualized.
This isn't like a war where the military can come
(06:28):
in and do it. I think it's best done actually
by the people who know how to target people individually,
have their paperwork, have the data. Who is it that
we want? Who are we going after? And I think
it will also be accepted better if we go initially
after the criminally violent and you know, I would make
it like an emergency to go after the fifteen thousand
(06:50):
murderers and the thirteen thousand suspected and or convicted rapist
and sexual assault people. I would make that an all
points bulletin. I would make that an emergence see and
I would have that at the top of the list
what the fbis was.
Speaker 7 (07:02):
To be doing.
Speaker 2 (07:03):
Now, yeah, well, you talk about the fifteen thousand murderers,
the thirteen thousand sexual assault predators, but none of these
twelve and a half million, which is around the estimate.
We have no idea about godaways. But you have so
many people from our top geopolitical foes countries would terroritize
entered this country. We have known terrorists in this country, cartels,
(07:24):
gang members, you know, we have hundreds of Lake and
Riley's and Rachel Morins and Joscelyn Nungarys. We have, but
literally hundreds of Americans, including children, that have been raped.
We have thousands of Americans that have been victims of
violent crimes by these alleged Harris Biden illegals. We saw
the case of Lake and Riley and the conviction there.
(07:46):
I don't know, I mean, twelve and a half million
unvetted Harris Biden illegals to me is the biggest national
security threat in our lifetime because I would imagine the
known terrorists that are in our country, we don't know
where they are, that if we don't find them, I
can assume that they're plotting and planning and scheming another
nine to eleven.
Speaker 3 (08:06):
Am I wrong?
Speaker 1 (08:07):
Well, you have to go after them, and I'm all
for it. The only way practically to find them, though,
is to go after them individually. It's not like you
can sort of say, hey, everybody, show up, these people
are now on the LAMB. So you're going to have
to have their names, their last known addresses, any information
you've got when you screen them the first time, and
really the law enforcement agency that's able to do this
kind of investigation to find people is essentially going to
(08:30):
be the FBI also assistance, and I think you have
to try to do it according to the law. The
law says you can't use the military domestically. If you
talk to most of our soldiers, they'll tell you they
don't want to do domestic missions. They don't want to
be policemen. They don't want to be floating about walking.
You know, ten thousand troops walking down the streets in
New York City is not an image that we've ever
(08:50):
contemplated or want to have. But there is a way
to do this, and to do this in a robust way,
but we've ever tried before. Let's start by at least trying.
Like I would say, is you got to prioritize your
list because it's a lot of people. But the fifteen
thousand murderers and thirteen thousand sexual assault perpetrators top of
(09:11):
the list, then you're right. There are people from terrorist
watch lists. There's also people from cartel lists. There's people
had known Todds. And it's like we need to also
remember they all got in because Biden didn't screen him.
He just sort of sent them paid for tickets and
the worst insult. I mean, we're watching the trial of
lacln Riley's murder. Did you realize that they flew him
(09:33):
to Atlanta?
Speaker 3 (09:33):
They flew him to from New York City? Yes, sir, yeah,
so a.
Speaker 1 (09:37):
Lot of Americans looking for jobs, nobody flying any of
us around, and yet they flew him to New York,
first put him up in a hotel, gave him three
meals a day, and then flew him down to Georgia
where he committed murder. So we've got to stop that.
In fact, I think the law my first here, do you.
Speaker 2 (09:54):
Do believe that Harris Biden, may Orcus all aided and
embedded and lawbreaking?
Speaker 3 (09:59):
Because I do.
Speaker 1 (10:00):
Yeah, they did, and I don't know how you actually punish,
and we're lucky to be rid of them. But you know,
my first hearing in Homeland Security when I chair the
committee is going to be on remain in Mexico, and
I frankly think that we should not hear asylum complaints
from anybody who comes in illegally. So ninety nine percent
of them are coming in illegally. I think it's a
not a valid complaint to complain about you wanting asylum
(10:24):
when you come in illegally. I also would turn people
back at the river at the border. If you're halfway
across the river, your boat gets turned around, you get
deposited on the other side, instead of cutting the concertina
wire that the Texans have put out. They should not
be assisted. They should be assisted only in returning to
the dry land on the other side. I don't think
(10:44):
we have to process these people. I think you process
people who come in through normal channels. People who come
in illegal, illegally, I think should be deposited immediately back
on the other side.
Speaker 3 (10:56):
Right we continue.
Speaker 2 (10:57):
Now it's Senator Rampaul, the Great State of Kentucky with us.
So I've thrown out this idea. I've heard nobody else
talk about it. What about giving people a small grace
period thirty sixty days, self report, self deport and you
know we will fly you back to the country. If
you self report and we will deport you, We'll do it.
(11:17):
Humanitarian considerations at the top of the list. Maybe put
money in their pocket, a little bit of money so
they can rebuild their lives, and give them the opportunity
because they were honest that they came here illegally, give
them the opportunity in a year or two if they
want to try or attempt to come in legally, that
they'd have the right to do so. Anybody that doesn't
(11:37):
self report to port those people would never have the
opportunity to come back.
Speaker 8 (11:43):
You know what I would do, if I'd go even
one step further, I would exchange work permits for those
who haven't committed crimes. But the exchange would be you
never vote, no pathway to citizenship. But if you want
to stay in our country and work legally, and you
want to register as a foreign worker, you can, and
then would get away from the people been housekeepers for
thirty years. And I think that's what does bother people
(12:04):
is thinking, well.
Speaker 1 (12:05):
Gosh, I don't want them here. I don't want them
to be illegal. But then again, I do know this
woman and she's you know, she's a nice woman's working
for thirty years. We really want to uproot her and
take her back across the border. And that's why you
prioritize it. Let's see about that case. After we've deported
the thirty thousand murderers, thugs and rapists. Let's see what
about after we get rid of the two million young
(12:28):
young males that came across in the last year or
two that we need to have sent back immediately. So
I think there are ways of prioritizing it. But it's
also if you want the American people to accept it.
I think doing it with the military is the wrong
way to go. But you have scept to change the
law because the law currently forbids it.
Speaker 2 (12:45):
Have you spoken to President Trump about this? And I
would prioritize not only the murderers, the rapist, the gang members,
the cartel members, the known terrorists, but the last the
people that have come in the last four four years,
because they're the ones that came in unvetted.
Speaker 3 (13:02):
Have you talked to President Trump about it?
Speaker 1 (13:05):
I've talked to the nominee for Homeland Security, Christy Nome
about it, and will continue to talk to her about
as we interview her. My goal is to have her
And by the.
Speaker 3 (13:14):
Way, what did she say? If you don't mind, well,
I don't.
Speaker 1 (13:16):
Want to characterize her speech. It's just not fair for
me to do. But I will say that I think
she's a reasonable, rational person and I think I can
work well with her. I'm going to try to get
her nomination done even before the inauguration, and then her
vote immediately after the inauguration. Sometimes we can get these
done in the first day or two after the inauguration,
some of these appointments. And I think I'm going to
(13:38):
work hard to do that. And I think it's a
it's a healthy discussion to have on military or otherwise,
and I think that we can we can do this.
And we've had a long standing tradition of not wanting
our military operating in our domestically because they do, they
operate differently. They're they're trained to kill the enemy. I'm
all for them having that kind of standard, but it's
(14:01):
just different. I mean, this is why we have to
appreciate our police so much, is that police have a
really difficult job, you know, figuring out who individually has
committed crimes, getting warrants, getting arrest warrants, going to the
door of that specific person.
Speaker 2 (14:15):
I think, oh, I got your Your argument's persuasive as
long as we have the manpower and factor in the
urgency of the situation that they have created. Senator Rampaul,
you and your family have a great Thanksgiving. Always appreciate
you being on. Thank you, by the way, doctor Hannity
is in the house. How do you deal with your
crazy Trump hating liberal relatives? On Thursday eight hundred nine
(14:36):
four one Shawn call Us, Now, just tell us how
you're going to do it. By the way, doctor Hannity
is in the house, how do you deal with your
crazy Trump hating liberal relatives? On Thursday eight hundred nine
one Shawn call Us, Now, just tell us how you're
going to do it. Why don't play Bill Maher? I
play all these lunatic lefties. I don't know what's going
on with Bill Maher because he's making too much sense
(14:59):
and on program this weekend, and I guess it was
his last for the season, and I'm still not a
big fan of his and I think it can be
a bit of a jackass. However, he's telling people on
the left what they don't want to hear, why they lost,
and what's wrong with them, And then he even went
as far as to say, I'm not going to pre
hate Trump's nominees. You know, let's see what the disruptors
(15:19):
can do, which, by the way, is you know, after
I've lost elections that I really was invested in and
wanted to win, kind of how I approach things. He
had a debate with our old friend Donna Brazil, and
you know, pointed out that if you want to keep
losing then and you just keep denying that, well, politics
in park cost you the election. And then he sparred
(15:42):
with some other guy, this guy Neil Tyson over vaccines,
and it's like, why doesn't the rest of their party
understand this. I'm trying to understand why they are so
checked out and wrong. Anyway, let me play a few
portions of this for you.
Speaker 9 (15:57):
The country does need disrupting. I mean, the country needs
a colonic and a slot in the face.
Speaker 6 (16:02):
So bad.
Speaker 9 (16:04):
This this is not who I would choose to administer
the colonic.
Speaker 3 (16:11):
But it's not like the bureaucracy isn't bloated.
Speaker 9 (16:13):
It's not like the debt isn't thirty six trillion dollars.
It's not like there aren't thousands of regulations that do
stop people from living lives that they could live better
and don't do anything. There is woke in the military
whatever they're going after. I'm not saying there isn't a
and I'm not going to pre hate anything. Do I
(16:34):
have really good optimistic feelings about it?
Speaker 10 (16:37):
No, I don't.
Speaker 3 (16:39):
You know, I'm just not going to preh hate.
Speaker 7 (16:41):
I can't.
Speaker 9 (16:41):
I can't get into that mind gorad. Let's see what
the disruptors can do, because quite frankly, the experts have
just sort of like let something go for so long
that it's just slerotic now and constipated.
Speaker 11 (16:54):
So while I do believe that they've made significant gains,
there's no question immigration became an issue. But I'm not
going to get into this. All the people are too
damn woke. That wasn't an issue. What happened it was.
I disagree with you, I.
Speaker 6 (17:10):
Know, and that's why you're going to keep thosing I
mean just goes to vaccines. Okay, I don't want to
like poke the bear here, but what I'm saying is.
Speaker 9 (17:22):
The bear believes in vaccines. Just being skeptical of all
medical interventions as everyone should.
Speaker 6 (17:28):
Well except cever, except except ninety nine out of one
hundred medical interventions. You're not saying I need a second opinion.
If you have tuberculosis, you don't need a second opinion.
If you have it's it's not close to ninety nine percent,
break a femur, you have a second I agree.
Speaker 9 (17:46):
But that's not most things that happen to people. Lots
of things that happen to people. And I'm thrilled that
you don't have had this happen in your life. But
most and I hope you never do. But trust me,
just simple at a certain point in their life will
need a second opinion.
Speaker 6 (18:03):
Secon Yes, but that's after you've been through ninety nine others.
I'm trying to put credit back to doctors where our
life expectancy is three times what it was one hundred
and fifty years ago, and everyone before a hundred and
fifty years.
Speaker 3 (18:16):
Ago, but but but lower than.
Speaker 6 (18:18):
The rest pigantic, and half of them died before they
were thirty five.
Speaker 3 (18:22):
Yes, science matters, of course he does.
Speaker 6 (18:24):
But sometimes you don't sound that way.
Speaker 3 (18:26):
That's what worries me. Well, actually, actually.
Speaker 7 (18:29):
You're the guy.
Speaker 9 (18:31):
You're the guy who doesn't understand why the NBA team
can beat the Lakers.
Speaker 7 (18:35):
So I don't know. You know, you're supposed to be.
Speaker 9 (18:37):
You're supposed to be, You're supposed to be the scientist,
and you couldn't even admit that.
Speaker 2 (18:41):
I mean, those are all Linda, don't you think those
are all interesting exchanges?
Speaker 12 (18:45):
I think Rebell Maher saying right now. It's pretty interesting, honestly.
Speaker 2 (18:49):
And he's not acting like a big baby. He even
said before the election, well, I think that Kamalo is
gonna win. But if Donald Trump wins, I'm gonna tell
you what I'm gonna do. I'm going to stay right here,
do my show, make jokes about Donald Trump, and do
my show.
Speaker 13 (19:03):
We know what's funny about him, and this is, I
don't know. I mean, he's not a very religious or
political person.
Speaker 12 (19:10):
While being great.
Speaker 13 (19:13):
He did that movie Religulous years ago, which was like
super offensive on many levels.
Speaker 12 (19:17):
But whatever, that's a conversation for another day.
Speaker 13 (19:20):
But the thing I like about him, and what I
find interesting about him is that he hates everybody right
like nobody's off the shopping block, everybody's up for discussion.
Speaker 3 (19:27):
And I kind of really that's a great way to
put it, because that's like you.
Speaker 12 (19:30):
Exactly equal opportunity hater all day, every day.
Speaker 13 (19:33):
I think what's interesting about him is that, you know,
he had a lot to say here, and you know,
if we look back at Trump, those four years of Trump,
they were so successful and so whether you wanted to
hate Trump or not, your pocketbook loved them. You know
your safety for your family, loved him, and then you
look at the last four years of Biden Kamala and
(19:53):
your pocketbook is empty, and kids are getting killed and
borders are being brazened every day. I mean, we saw
this this morning with the two year old who walked
across by herself. Well, I mean, when do we start
fighting for them?
Speaker 12 (20:05):
I just don't get it. But Bill Mahers, He's just like, listen, man,
I'm going to keep doing me and the rest of
us can cry a good cry, but I'm here to
do a job and he's doing it.
Speaker 2 (20:12):
It's all gonna happen. Leland is in Michigan. Thanks to
our friends in Michigan. That was a big win for
President Trump. Leland, how are you glad you called sar Oh?
Speaker 10 (20:21):
I'm doing well. I'm a blue collar, illiterate, deplorable piece
of garbage, but I'm doing fine. Thank you.
Speaker 2 (20:27):
Oh so our brothers and you know from another mother,
I got it. Well, I'm right there with you. What's
going on?
Speaker 10 (20:34):
I wanted to tell you. I want to tell you
about my friend Betty. She passed away at ninety seven
years old, and she lived by herself, and I called
her a week before the election, and she was telling
me that she had all her family lined up to
vote for Trump and to talk to her you think
(20:56):
that she was on the reelection committee. And then when
I hung up and I found out just last week
as she passed away on Sunday before last and her
family said that she was just elated that Trump got
elected and that he didn't have a filter at all.
(21:20):
But anyway, she was always the last couple of years,
she was telling me, you know, I'm ready to go
and beam me up, Scottie. So anyway, I'm happy that
she was allowed.
Speaker 2 (21:31):
She got to see real hope and opportunity. I've been
saying this, it's these are not words. This is this
is an opportunity that maybe comes along every hundred years.
I think that this presidency can be so dramatically transformational
and benefit every American. You know, when if Donald Trump
(21:52):
is able to secure the borders, remove at a minimum,
these criminal elements, terrorist cartels, murderers, rapists, you know, all
of these gangs, everybody involved in this, that is going
to be a huge, huge benefit to the country. If
he restores law and order and safety and security in
every town and every city, that will be a huge
(22:13):
service to our country. If he gets the economy moving again,
lower's interest rates, lowers the cost of goods and services,
that is going to benefit everybody. If he drops the
price of gasoline at buck buck and a half, hagwon
let me tell you that's going to be great for us.
If he makes us energy dominant, we'll start paying down
the debt, we'll prevent Medicare, Social Security from heading towards insolvency,
(22:35):
and we'll be able to help out veterans more and
other Americans more. If he re establishes America's role in
the world, that's going to benefit everybody.
Speaker 3 (22:46):
He said, you were a blue collar worker in Michigan.
Did you work in the auto industry. I'm just guessing
I did.
Speaker 10 (22:52):
Yes, I worked thirty seven years for the same kind
of walk. And I my retired friends, I have a
lot of them, and uh, ninety percent of them voted
for Trump.
Speaker 3 (23:04):
Well, here's the thing. Think about this.
Speaker 2 (23:06):
You know this ev mandate cost Ford a year ago
four point five trillion dollars in losses. Now, if that
would have continued, how long do you think it would
be before those high paying career jobs with good benefits
that you had in your life. How long do you
think it would be that they'd have to start laying
(23:27):
off a lot of people. If you're gonna, if the
government's gonna with their long reach, force car companies to
produce cars that obviously forwards customers didn't want. If if
anyone wants an electric vehicle, they're probably going to go
to Tesla. They want to produce those cars. They're good
at producing those cars. Don't force every other company into
an industry, you know, the same with you know, we're
(23:48):
going to have to retrofit our homes and put in
new refrigerators, washers, and dryers and air conditioners. I mean,
this madness has to stop. No drilling, no fracking. You know,
we we can be the most energy dominant country on
earth and be the wealthiest will we will be an
energy rich country? I predict them four years. So there
(24:08):
was so much at stake here. But you know, I
care about the guys on the line. I care about
u AW workers because and if Ford makes more money,
they can pay their workers more money and have the
same with you know, GM and Chrysler and any other
car company. I mean, what they were doing is they
were they were destroying these jobs, these career, high paying jobs,
(24:33):
and I'm like, it's unbelievable. They don't understand working men
and women. They've become the party of George Clooney, Julia Roberts, Hollywood,
San Francisco and New York and DC, and they're out
of touch with the people that actually, you know, are
the great Americans like you and your friend Betty.
Speaker 10 (24:50):
Yeah, I really miss Betty. She was she was a
good person.
Speaker 3 (24:55):
And sorry about your loss. I really mean that.
Speaker 10 (25:00):
Workers like you say we're all retired. We can see
the writing on the wall, you know. I'm sure a
lot of the people who are working can too. You know.
Speaker 2 (25:09):
Well, God bless you Leland. You you deserve your vacate
your retirement. I hope you enjoy it in good health.
I'm sorry about your loss. I'm glad you called to helpe.
You'll check back in soon.
Speaker 10 (25:19):
Okay, Ollie, thanks for taking my call.
Speaker 2 (25:22):
Thank you, my friend. Eight hundred and nine to four one.
Shawn is a number if you want to be a
part of the program. Let us say hi to Brian
and Oklahoma. Brian, how are you glad you called?
Speaker 7 (25:34):
Thank you very much for taking my call.
Speaker 3 (25:37):
My pleasure.
Speaker 7 (25:37):
I appreciate. I appreciate all you do for our country
and for educating all your listeners. I'm a schoolteacher here
in al Reno, Oklahoma, and I'm also the district's historian,
and I was hoping to get to challenge your listeners
to consider doing something similar to what we do here
in al Reno and their communities that really helped to
(25:59):
highlight our veterans and support our veterans. Like I said,
there's two programs that The first is a project that
we've been doing for seventy nine years, Sarah Alverno, ever
since the end of World War Two, and even before then,
we were doing something similar to it called Gifts for
the Yanks who gave and in it we have our
(26:20):
students raise money. We raise usually thousands of dollars, and
they go out and purchase gifts, wrap them, and then
they deliver them in person to the patients at the
VA Hospital in Oklahoma City. It's a program that started
right after during World War two, actually, and the American
(26:40):
Legion does it. The Ohio and Illinois American Legions I
know are really active with it.
Speaker 10 (26:46):
But we're the.
Speaker 7 (26:47):
Only high school in the country that still does it.
And has done it ever since nineteen forty five.
Speaker 3 (26:53):
What's the website if people want to go there? What
is it?
Speaker 7 (26:57):
L renops dot org is our websit, and I can.
I'll be happy to help out giving people ideas. It's
a really emotional experience for our students to get to
deliver these gifts because they get, you know, the hand
deliver them, and the veterans tell their stories and you know,
may its awesome people people cry. Yeah, absolutely, and we
(27:18):
always get thank you letters from from the patients, you know,
saying how much they appreciated.
Speaker 2 (27:24):
Let me tell you there's something that happens every Thanksgiving
around this country, and we fully support what you're doing
and your work, and I hope people in Oklahoma will
help you out. But I'm going to tell you something.
There are people that on this Thanksgiving and I've done
it a few years myself. I haven't done it recently
and I really should. And that is that they get
(27:45):
really involved in their community and they buy a bunch
of turkeys, They feed the homeless, they help the indigen
the elderly people in nursing homes. I don't know, there's
there's so much goodness and greatness in America, the unsung heroes,
which by the way, we try to give recognition to them,
(28:06):
and that's what the Patriot Awards are all about. And
I'm going to make my triumphant appearance to New York
where it's being held this year at Long Island University.
And by the way, if people want to come, you
can go to Foxnation dot com. But instead of Hollywood,
you know, slapping themselves on the back and musical artists
slapping themselves on the back, you know, we dedicated night
(28:29):
to the unsung heroes like you and the great work
that they do day in and day out that never
get any recognition. And I'm honored to be the MC
this year, and I hope people in New York, New
Jersey or may be flying from around the country and
Long Island will get there. You just go to Foxnation
dot com. It's on December fifth, looking forward to it
(28:50):
one week from this Thanksgiving.
Speaker 3 (28:54):
All right, that's gonna wrap.
Speaker 2 (28:55):
Things up at Today Hannity tonight nine Eastern on the
Fox News Channel.
Speaker 3 (28:58):
Please set you dbr.
Speaker 2 (29:00):
Tom Holman will join us, Greg Abbott, also Laura Trump,
Mike Huckabee, Sage Steele, and Charlie Hurt.
Speaker 3 (29:06):
Nine Eastern.
Speaker 2 (29:07):
Say you DVR HANNEDY and Fox will see you tonight
back here tomorrow. Yes, we want to know how you're
going to deal with your crazy liberal trumpeting relatives this
Thursday Whosday edition Sean Hannity Show, will see you tomorrow
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Good Game with Sarah Spain
Good Game is your one-stop shop for the biggest stories in women’s sports. Every day, host Sarah Spain gives you the stories, stakes, stars and stats to keep up with your favorite women’s teams, leagues and athletes. Through thoughtful insight, witty banter, and an all around good time, Sarah and friends break down the latest news, talk about the games you can’t miss, and debate the issues of the day. Don’t miss interviews with the people of the moment, whether they be athletes, coaches, reporters, or celebrity fans.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations.
Crime Junkie
If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people.